Zapata County is a rural county in far South Texas along the U.S.–Mexico border, situated on the Rio Grande and roughly midway between Laredo and McAllen. Created in 1858 and named for Antonio Zapata, a leader in the 1810–1813 Republican Army of the North, the county is part of the Lower Rio Grande Valley region and reflects longstanding cross-border ties. Zapata is the county seat and principal population center. With a population of about 14,000, Zapata County is small in scale and characterized by low-density settlement and large tracts of rangeland. The landscape includes the Rio Grande corridor and Falcon Reservoir (Lake Falcon), which influences local recreation and water management. The economy centers on government and local services, ranching and agriculture, and oil and gas activity, with additional employment tied to trade and transportation linked to the international border. The county’s culture is predominantly Hispanic and bilingual, shaped by regional Tejano traditions and borderland history.
Zapata County Local Demographic Profile
Zapata County is a sparsely populated county in South Texas along the U.S.–Mexico border, centered on the community of Zapata and the shoreline of Falcon Lake (Falcon Reservoir). It lies roughly between Laredo (Webb County) and the lower Rio Grande Valley, within the broader Rio Grande Plains region.
Population Size
- Total population (2020): 13,889. According to the U.S. Census Bureau profile for Zapata County, Texas, the county’s population at the 2020 Census was 13,889.
Age & Gender
Using the U.S. Census Bureau’s county profile tables on data.census.gov (Decennial Census and ACS profile content):
- Age distribution: The county’s age structure is reported in standard Census age bands (under 5, 5–9, …, 85+), summarized in the Age and Sex section of the county profile.
- Gender ratio: Sex counts (male/female) and associated percentages are published in the Age and Sex section of the same profile.
Note: This profile consolidates multiple Census program tables; specific year-vintages for detailed age bands and sex breakdowns are shown directly within the table headers on data.census.gov.
Racial & Ethnic Composition
According to the U.S. Census Bureau profile for Zapata County, the county’s racial categories (as defined by the Census) and Hispanic/Latino origin statistics are reported in the Race and Hispanic Origin sections, including:
- Hispanic or Latino (of any race) versus Not Hispanic or Latino
- Race categories such as White, Black or African American, American Indian and Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, Some Other Race, and Two or More Races (availability varies by table/program and is displayed in the profile)
Household & Housing Data
Household composition and housing characteristics are reported in the U.S. Census Bureau’s Zapata County profile on data.census.gov, including:
- Households: total number of households; average household size; family vs. nonfamily households (as shown in the profile’s households/families sections)
- Housing units: total housing units; occupancy status (occupied vs. vacant); selected housing characteristics included in the profile tables
- Homeownership and tenure: owner-occupied vs. renter-occupied distributions (reported in the housing/tenure sections)
For local government context and community planning information, the Zapata County official website provides county administration and departmental resources.
Email Usage
Zapata County is a sparsely populated South Texas border county where long distances between communities and limited last‑mile infrastructure can constrain always‑on digital communication such as email. Direct county‑level email usage statistics are generally not published; broadband and device indicators are used as proxies for likely email access.
Digital access measures for Zapata County (households with a broadband internet subscription, computer/smartphone availability, and related connectivity metrics) are available through the U.S. Census Bureau’s data.census.gov (American Community Survey). These indicators reflect the practical ability to create accounts, maintain inbox access, and use webmail securely.
Age structure also shapes email adoption: older populations tend to use email more for formal communication, while younger groups often rely more on messaging platforms. County age distribution can be referenced via ACS demographic tables.
Gender composition is typically close to balanced and is not a primary driver of email access relative to connectivity and devices; baseline sex distribution is reported in Census QuickFacts.
Infrastructure limitations affecting access (provider availability, speeds, and coverage) are documented in the FCC National Broadband Map and locally through Zapata County government resources.
Mobile Phone Usage
Zapata County is a sparsely populated, predominantly rural county in South Texas along the U.S.–Mexico border, with the county seat in Zapata. The county’s large geographic area, low population density, and settlement patterns concentrated around the Falcon Lake corridor and along major roadways tend to make mobile coverage more variable than in Texas metropolitan counties, with greater sensitivity to tower spacing, backhaul availability, and terrain/vegetation near the Rio Grande and lake shoreline. County background and geography are summarized through the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts profile for Zapata County.
Key distinction: network availability vs. adoption
- Network availability refers to whether mobile carriers report service coverage (e.g., 4G LTE or 5G) at a location.
- Adoption refers to whether households and individuals actually subscribe to and use mobile service (voice and/or mobile broadband) and what devices they use.
County-level reporting is stronger for availability (FCC coverage data) than for adoption (household subscription and device-type metrics are often published at tract/county level only for certain indicators, and some mobile-specific adoption measures are better captured at state or national levels).
Mobile penetration / access indicators (adoption)
Household internet subscription and mobile-only connectivity (proxy indicators)
County-level “mobile penetration” is not consistently published as a single metric, but several indicators provide proxies for mobile access and reliance:
- Household internet subscription (any type) and related measures for Zapata County are available via data.census.gov (American Community Survey tables covering internet subscription and computing devices). These tables are commonly used to estimate:
- The share of households with an internet subscription (which can include cellular data plans).
- The share of households with a computer versus those relying on handheld devices (depending on table selection and year).
- Limitations: ACS tables can identify internet subscriptions and device presence, but translating that into a precise “mobile-only household” rate at the county level may be constrained by table availability, margins of error (especially in small counties), and changes in question wording across years.
Program participation as a demand-side indicator
- The FCC’s affordability program dashboards (historically including the Affordable Connectivity Program) have been used as demand-side indicators of broadband affordability and adoption pressures, but county-level visibility varies over time and by program status. Current FCC broadband program and data portals are centralized at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
- Limitations: Participation metrics are not equivalent to overall mobile subscription rates and are not a complete measure of mobile adoption.
Mobile internet usage patterns and network technology availability (4G / 5G)
Reported coverage (availability)
- The FCC maintains the national broadband availability dataset and mapping interface that includes mobile broadband coverage by technology generation and carrier-reported polygons. The primary public interface is the FCC National Broadband Map.
- This source supports location-based checks in Zapata County for 4G LTE and 5G availability and can be summarized at multiple geographies.
- Limitations: Mobile coverage is carrier-reported and model-based; real-world performance can differ due to terrain, tower loading, device band support, indoor attenuation, and backhaul constraints. The FCC map is an availability indicator, not a performance guarantee.
Technology mix (typical rural pattern)
- In rural South Texas counties, 4G LTE generally remains the baseline wide-area layer, with 5G availability more variable and often concentrated around population centers and major transport corridors.
- Limitations: Countywide generalizations about the share of area covered by 5G versus LTE require map-derived summaries from the FCC dataset; without extracting those data for Zapata County specifically, only qualitative statements about rural patterns can be made.
Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)
Smartphones as the primary access device
- Nationally and statewide, smartphones are the dominant mobile access device for consumers, and in rural counties with fewer fixed broadband options, reliance on smartphones (and phone-based hotspots) can be elevated relative to urban areas.
- County-level device-type breakdowns (smartphone vs. basic phone vs. tablet/hotspot) are not consistently published in a standardized way for Zapata County alone.
- The best county-level proxy for device ecosystem and household computing resources is the ACS “computers and internet use” content accessed via data.census.gov, which distinguishes categories such as desktop/laptop/tablet presence and household internet subscription types in certain tables.
- Limitations: The ACS measures household device presence and subscription categories, not the exact distribution of smartphone models, operating systems, or carrier-specific device mixes.
Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity
Rurality and low population density
- Low density increases the per-customer cost of building and maintaining tower infrastructure and fiber backhaul, which can reduce network redundancy and coverage uniformity. This often yields:
- Larger gaps between cell sites and more edge-of-coverage areas.
- Greater sensitivity to line-of-sight and terrain/vegetation near water and brushland.
- Baseline demographic and housing characteristics relevant to adoption (income, age distribution, educational attainment, housing occupancy) are available via the Census QuickFacts page and underlying ACS tables on data.census.gov.
Border geography and travel corridors
- Zapata County’s border location and long-distance travel along key routes can influence where carriers prioritize coverage (population centers, highways, and commercial nodes).
- Limitations: Public datasets generally do not quantify carrier investment decisions at county scale; coverage must be assessed through FCC availability layers and on-the-ground testing.
Fixed-broadband availability and substitution effects
- Where fixed broadband options are limited or expensive, households can substitute mobile broadband for home connectivity (smartphone-only use or hotspot/tethering). Fixed availability and speeds are tracked via the FCC broadband map alongside mobile layers at the FCC National Broadband Map.
- Limitations: Substitution is an adoption behavior and is not directly observable from availability data alone.
Data sources and county-level limitations (summary)
- Best source for mobile network availability (4G/5G): FCC National Broadband Map (carrier-reported coverage and technology layers).
- Best sources for adoption proxies (household access, devices, subscriptions): data.census.gov and the county profile at Census QuickFacts.
- Primary limitation: A single, definitive county-level “mobile penetration” metric (e.g., percentage of residents with a mobile subscription or smartphone) is not uniformly published in public federal datasets for every county. As a result, Zapata County analysis typically combines FCC availability with Census/ACS household adoption proxies, while clearly treating them as separate dimensions.
Social Media Trends
Zapata County is a small, predominantly Hispanic county in South Texas along the Rio Grande, anchored by the community of Zapata and influenced by cross-border culture, outdoor tourism (notably Falcon Lake recreation), and a regional economy tied to public services, trade, and energy activity. Its rural geography and long driving distances typical of South Texas elevate the importance of mobile connectivity and social platforms for news, local coordination, and community ties.
User statistics (penetration and active use)
- Local, county-specific social media penetration figures are not published in major federal datasets at the county level. Publicly available benchmarks most often require applying statewide or national survey rates to local demographics.
- Statewide and national benchmarks commonly used for context:
- Overall adult social media use in the U.S.: About 7 in 10 U.S. adults use at least one social media site (Pew Research Center, 2023). Source: Pew Research Center: Social Media Use in 2023.
- Internet and device access (relevant to social use): The U.S. Census Bureau tracks local patterns of broadband and device access via the American Community Survey and related products, which are often used as proxies for potential social media reach. Source portal: U.S. Census Bureau data portal (ACS).
Age group trends (who uses social media most)
Nationally, age is the strongest predictor of social platform use:
- 18–29: Highest usage across major platforms; broad multi-platform adoption.
- 30–49: High usage, especially for Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and WhatsApp in many communities.
- 50–64: Moderate-to-high usage, with heavier concentration on Facebook and YouTube.
- 65+: Lowest overall usage, but Facebook and YouTube remain common. These patterns are summarized in: Pew Research Center: Social Media Use in 2023.
Gender breakdown
National survey results show platform-specific gender differences rather than a uniform overall split:
- Women tend to be more likely than men to use Pinterest and often show slightly higher use on some social apps.
- Men tend to be more likely than women to use platforms such as Reddit (and some other discussion- or forum-oriented spaces). Reference: Pew Research Center: Americans’ Social Media Use (latest platform detail).
Most-used platforms (with benchmark percentages)
County-level platform market shares are typically not available from public sources; the following U.S. adult usage rates are commonly used as benchmarks for local context (Pew Research Center):
- YouTube: ~83% of U.S. adults
- Facebook: ~68%
- Instagram: ~47%
- Pinterest: ~35%
- TikTok: ~33%
- LinkedIn: ~30%
- WhatsApp: ~29%
- Snapchat: ~27%
- X (formerly Twitter): ~22%
- Reddit: ~22%
Source: Pew Research Center: Americans’ Social Media Use.
Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)
Patterns below reflect widely observed U.S. usage behaviors, with relevance to rural South Texas counties such as Zapata due to mobile-first access and community-driven information sharing:
- Mobile-first social activity: U.S. smartphone adoption is near-universal among younger adults and high overall, reinforcing short-form video and messaging usage. Benchmark context: Pew Research Center: Mobile fact sheet.
- Video-led engagement: YouTube’s high penetration supports heavy consumption of how-to content, local/regional news clips, and entertainment; TikTok and Instagram Reels drive short-form discovery and sharing.
- Community information flows: Facebook remains a primary venue nationally for local updates and community-oriented posts; this aligns with rural areas where events, safety notices, and informal marketplaces often consolidate on a small number of widely used platforms. Benchmark platform prevalence: Pew’s platform usage summary.
- Messaging and group coordination: WhatsApp usage is substantial nationally and is commonly associated with tight social networks and group chats; this is frequently relevant in predominantly Hispanic communities and border regions where cross-network communication is common. Benchmark: Pew Research Center platform breakdown (includes WhatsApp).
- Age-driven platform segmentation: Younger users concentrate engagement on Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube, while older users concentrate on Facebook and YouTube, shaping where community announcements versus entertainment discovery tends to occur. Source: Pew Research Center: Americans’ Social Media Use.
Family & Associates Records
Zapata County maintains family and associate-related public records primarily through the County Clerk and District Clerk. Vital records include birth and death records filed at the county level, with certified copies generally issued through the Zapata County Clerk, while statewide issuance and vital statistics rules are administered by the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) Vital Statistics. Marriage licenses and marriage records are typically maintained by the County Clerk. Divorce records and other family-court filings are generally maintained by the Zapata County District Clerk. Adoption records are generally not public and are handled through court processes, with access commonly restricted.
Public online databases for family records are limited at the county level. Zapata County participates in statewide judicial e-filing for many case types via eFileTexas, while official copies of court records are typically obtained from the District Clerk’s office.
Residents access records in person at the County Clerk or District Clerk offices at the Zapata County official website address listings; some requests may be handled by mail or phone per office procedures.
Privacy restrictions commonly apply to birth and death certificates, adoption files, and certain family court records involving minors, sealed cases, or confidential information. Identification and eligibility requirements are set by Texas law and office policy.
Marriage & Divorce Records
Types of records available
- Marriage license and marriage record (certificate/return): Issued by the county clerk and completed after the ceremony when the officiant returns the executed license for recording. Zapata County maintains the local record of marriages licensed in the county.
- Divorce records (case file, final decree of divorce): Divorce is handled as a civil case in district court. The court record commonly includes the petition, orders, and the final decree of divorce.
- Annulment records (case file, decree of annulment/order): Annulments are court proceedings and are maintained in the district court’s civil case records, typically culminating in an order or decree.
Where records are filed and how they can be accessed
Marriage records (county level)
- Filed/recorded with: Zapata County Clerk (as the county’s recorder for vital and official records).
- Access methods: In-person requests at the County Clerk’s office; written requests by mail are commonly accepted. Certified copies are issued by the County Clerk for marriages recorded in Zapata County.
- State-level index/verification: The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), Vital Statistics Section maintains statewide marriage and divorce indexes for certain years and provides verification letters in some cases.
Divorce and annulment records (court level)
- Filed with: The district clerk in the county where the case is filed (Zapata County district court civil case records).
- Access methods: Case records are generally available through the District Clerk’s office via in-person public access terminals or record requests. Certified copies of final judgments/decrees are typically obtained from the District Clerk.
Electronic access
- Texas counties vary in online availability. When online portals exist, they typically provide docket information and non-confidential filings; certified copies generally require a clerk-issued certification. Zapata County access practices are administered locally through the relevant clerk offices.
Typical information included in these records
Marriage license/record
- Full legal names of both parties (and commonly prior names)
- Date and place of marriage license issuance
- County of issuance and license number
- Ages/birthdates (varies by form/era), residences, and sometimes places of birth
- Officiant name/title and date/place of ceremony
- Date the executed license was returned and recorded
- Clerk certification and recording details
Divorce case records and final decree
- Case caption (names of parties), cause number, and court
- Date of filing and date of judgment
- Findings and orders dissolving the marriage
- Terms on property division and debt allocation
- Orders regarding children (conservatorship/custody, possession/access, child support) when applicable
- Spousal maintenance provisions when applicable
- Name changes granted by the court when included
- Judge signature and clerk filing/recording stamps
Annulment case records and decree/order
- Case caption, cause number, and court
- Legal grounds asserted and findings
- Order declaring the marriage void or voidable (as applicable)
- Orders addressing children, support, and property matters when applicable
- Judge signature and clerk filing/recording stamps
Privacy and legal restrictions
Public access framework
- Marriage records recorded by the County Clerk and court records maintained by the District Clerk are generally subject to public access under Texas law, with statutory and court-rule exceptions.
Confidential or restricted information
- Court records can contain information restricted by law or court order, including certain information involving minors, family violence, protective orders, Social Security numbers, financial account numbers, and other sensitive identifiers subject to redaction rules.
- Some family-law filings and specific documents may be sealed by court order or otherwise restricted under applicable statutes and Texas court rules.
Certified copies and identity requirements
- Clerks issue certified copies as official evidence. For marriage records, the County Clerk commonly issues certified copies of the recorded marriage. For divorces/annulments, the District Clerk commonly issues certified copies of final judgments/decrees. Offices may require sufficient identifying information to locate records and may apply fee schedules set by law.
Statewide vital statistics limitations
- Texas DSHS maintains indexes and may provide verification rather than a full certified court decree or county marriage record. Official certified copies of local marriage records and certified court decrees are typically obtained from the county of record.
Education, Employment and Housing
Zapata County is a sparsely populated South Texas border county along the Rio Grande, anchored by the community of Zapata and the Falcon Lake recreational area. The population is predominantly Hispanic/Latino, with a rural-small town settlement pattern and a local economy shaped by public services, trade/logistics tied to the border region, and resource and outdoor-recreation activity associated with the lake.
Education Indicators
Public schools (count and names)
Public K–12 education in Zapata County is primarily served by Zapata County Independent School District (ZCISD). School campuses commonly listed for the district include:
- Zapata High School
- Zapata Middle School
- Zapata South Elementary
- Zapata North Elementary
(For current campus listings and programs, see the district’s official site: Zapata County ISD.)
Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates
- Student–teacher ratio (county-level proxy): The most consistently available ratio is for the county’s public school system as reported in national school/district profiles; Zapata County schools are typically reported in the mid–teens-to-1 range (a common rural Texas range). A single official countywide ratio published in one standardized series is not consistently available in a way that is comparable across years for all campuses.
- Graduation rate: Texas reports graduation outcomes through the state accountability system. Zapata County’s graduation rate is best referenced via the district’s state accountability and completion reports, which are published by the Texas Education Agency: TEA accountability reports. A single countywide graduation rate value is not uniformly published as a standalone statistic separate from the district’s annual accountability release.
Adult educational attainment
Adult education levels are most consistently measured through the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS). For Zapata County, the pattern reported in ACS profiles is:
- A majority of adults have at least a high school diploma (including GED), but the share is below the Texas statewide average.
- The share with a bachelor’s degree or higher is substantially below the Texas statewide average. County-level attainment is available in ACS “Educational Attainment” tables and county profiles: U.S. Census Bureau data (data.census.gov).
Notable programs (STEM, CTE/vocational, AP/dual credit)
- Career and Technical Education (CTE): Like most Texas districts, ZCISD participates in TEA-aligned CTE pathways (career clusters), which function as the main vocational training structure in rural districts.
- Advanced academics: Texas districts commonly offer Advanced Placement (AP) and/or dual credit options through regional postsecondary partners; program availability varies by year and staffing. District program documentation is typically posted through ZCISD curriculum/counseling pages and campus course catalogs: ZCISD academics and counseling resources.
- STEM: STEM offerings in rural districts are often integrated into core science/math coursework, career pathways, and extracurriculars rather than stand-alone magnet programs; the most reliable confirmation is district program listings.
School safety measures and counseling resources
- Safety: Texas public schools operate under state school safety and emergency operations planning requirements, including drills, threat assessment practices, and campus safety procedures aligned with TEA guidance: TEA school safety resources.
- Counseling/mental health: Texas districts provide counseling staff and student support services consistent with state requirements and district staffing. ZCISD typically publishes counseling contacts and resources through campus pages and student services sections: ZCISD student services.
Employment and Economic Conditions
Unemployment rate (most recent year available)
The most standardized local unemployment statistics come from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS). Zapata County’s recent annual unemployment rate has generally been higher than the Texas statewide rate, reflecting rural labor-market size and seasonality. The most recent annual and monthly figures are published here: BLS LAUS (local unemployment).
(A single numeric value is not embedded here because the BLS series updates monthly; the linked LAUS tables provide the current county rate.)
Major industries and employment sectors
Based on ACS “Industry by Occupation” and county economic profiles, the largest employment sectors in Zapata County typically include:
- Educational services, health care, and social assistance (often the largest combined sector in rural counties due to schools, clinics, and related services)
- Public administration
- Retail trade
- Construction
- Transportation and warehousing (regional trade/logistics influence)
- Accommodation and food services (including lake/recreation-related demand)
Industry composition and workforce counts are available via ACS and Census profiles: ACS industry and occupation tables.
Common occupations and workforce breakdown
Occupational groupings commonly showing higher shares locally include:
- Service occupations (food service, building/grounds, personal care)
- Office and administrative support
- Transportation and material moving
- Construction and extraction
- Education, training, and library (driven by the school system) Professional/technical occupations tend to represent a smaller share than statewide averages, consistent with rural county labor-market structure. Detailed occupational percentages are available in ACS occupation tables: ACS occupation profiles.
Commuting patterns and mean commute time
- Typical pattern: A substantial share of workers commute by driving alone, with limited fixed-route transit options typical of rural counties.
- Mean travel time to work: Zapata County’s mean commute time is generally reported in the mid‑20s minutes range in recent ACS profiles, varying by year and sampling. Commuting mode share and mean travel time are published in ACS “Commuting (Journey to Work)” tables: ACS Journey to Work data.
Local employment vs. out‑of‑county work
ACS “Place of Work” measures show that rural counties such as Zapata commonly have a meaningful portion of residents working outside the county, reflecting limited local job diversity and the draw of larger employment centers in the surrounding South Texas region. The in-county vs. out-of-county split is available through ACS commuting/place-of-work tables: ACS place-of-work tables.
Housing and Real Estate
Homeownership rate and rental share
ACS tenure estimates indicate Zapata County is primarily owner-occupied, with a smaller but notable renter segment. The homeownership share is typically higher than large urban counties but can vary with seasonal/secondary housing near Falcon Lake. Current tenure percentages are available in ACS housing tenure tables: ACS housing tenure.
Median property values and recent trends
- Median owner-occupied home value: ACS provides the median value for owner-occupied housing units; Zapata County’s median value is generally below the Texas statewide median, consistent with rural housing markets.
- Trend: Recent multi-year trends in South Texas rural counties have generally shown upward pressure on values since 2020, though Zapata’s small market can produce year-to-year volatility in estimates. Median value and trend can be tracked in ACS time series and county profiles: ACS median home value.
Typical rent prices
ACS “Gross Rent” provides the county median gross rent, which in Zapata County is generally lower than the Texas statewide median, reflecting local income levels and housing stock. Median gross rent is published here: ACS gross rent.
Types of housing
Zapata County housing stock is characterized by:
- Predominantly single-family detached homes and manufactured housing (a common rural South Texas pattern)
- Limited multifamily/apartment inventory concentrated around the main community of Zapata
- Rural lots and ranchettes, with some properties oriented to lake access/recreation near Falcon Lake
These distributions are summarized in ACS “Units in Structure” and related housing tables: ACS housing structure type.
Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools or amenities)
- The most concentrated access to schools, groceries, clinics, and county services is in and near the community of Zapata, where the main school campuses and public facilities are located.
- Outlying housing areas tend to be more rural and low-density, with longer driving distances to schools and daily services; lake-adjacent areas show more recreation-oriented land use. A definitive countywide “neighborhood” typology is not published as a standard statistical series; these characteristics reflect the county’s settlement pattern (county seat area vs. dispersed rural housing).
Property tax overview (average rate and typical homeowner cost)
- Property tax rate: Texas property taxes are levied by overlapping local jurisdictions (county, school district, and special districts). Zapata County’s effective property tax burden is typically shaped heavily by the school district rate, as is common statewide.
- Typical homeowner cost: The most comparable statistic is the ACS estimate of median real estate taxes paid for owner-occupied homes, available in ACS housing cost tables: ACS property taxes paid.
For official local rate schedules by taxing unit (county, school district, etc.), see the Zapata County Appraisal District: Zapata CAD.
Data notes: County-level education, commuting, and housing statistics are most consistently sourced from the American Community Survey (ACS) 5‑year estimates due to small population size. Unemployment is most consistently sourced from BLS LAUS, which updates regularly and should be used for the most recent point-in-time values.
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Texas
- Anderson
- Andrews
- Angelina
- Aransas
- Archer
- Armstrong
- Atascosa
- Austin
- Bailey
- Bandera
- Bastrop
- Baylor
- Bee
- Bell
- Bexar
- Blanco
- Borden
- Bosque
- Bowie
- Brazoria
- Brazos
- Brewster
- Briscoe
- Brooks
- Brown
- Burleson
- Burnet
- Caldwell
- Calhoun
- Callahan
- Cameron
- Camp
- Carson
- Cass
- Castro
- Chambers
- Cherokee
- Childress
- Clay
- Cochran
- Coke
- Coleman
- Collin
- Collingsworth
- Colorado
- Comal
- Comanche
- Concho
- Cooke
- Coryell
- Cottle
- Crane
- Crockett
- Crosby
- Culberson
- Dallam
- Dallas
- Dawson
- De Witt
- Deaf Smith
- Delta
- Denton
- Dickens
- Dimmit
- Donley
- Duval
- Eastland
- Ector
- Edwards
- El Paso
- Ellis
- Erath
- Falls
- Fannin
- Fayette
- Fisher
- Floyd
- Foard
- Fort Bend
- Franklin
- Freestone
- Frio
- Gaines
- Galveston
- Garza
- Gillespie
- Glasscock
- Goliad
- Gonzales
- Gray
- Grayson
- Gregg
- Grimes
- Guadalupe
- Hale
- Hall
- Hamilton
- Hansford
- Hardeman
- Hardin
- Harris
- Harrison
- Hartley
- Haskell
- Hays
- Hemphill
- Henderson
- Hidalgo
- Hill
- Hockley
- Hood
- Hopkins
- Houston
- Howard
- Hudspeth
- Hunt
- Hutchinson
- Irion
- Jack
- Jackson
- Jasper
- Jeff Davis
- Jefferson
- Jim Hogg
- Jim Wells
- Johnson
- Jones
- Karnes
- Kaufman
- Kendall
- Kenedy
- Kent
- Kerr
- Kimble
- King
- Kinney
- Kleberg
- Knox
- La Salle
- Lamar
- Lamb
- Lampasas
- Lavaca
- Lee
- Leon
- Liberty
- Limestone
- Lipscomb
- Live Oak
- Llano
- Loving
- Lubbock
- Lynn
- Madison
- Marion
- Martin
- Mason
- Matagorda
- Maverick
- Mcculloch
- Mclennan
- Mcmullen
- Medina
- Menard
- Midland
- Milam
- Mills
- Mitchell
- Montague
- Montgomery
- Moore
- Morris
- Motley
- Nacogdoches
- Navarro
- Newton
- Nolan
- Nueces
- Ochiltree
- Oldham
- Orange
- Palo Pinto
- Panola
- Parker
- Parmer
- Pecos
- Polk
- Potter
- Presidio
- Rains
- Randall
- Reagan
- Real
- Red River
- Reeves
- Refugio
- Roberts
- Robertson
- Rockwall
- Runnels
- Rusk
- Sabine
- San Augustine
- San Jacinto
- San Patricio
- San Saba
- Schleicher
- Scurry
- Shackelford
- Shelby
- Sherman
- Smith
- Somervell
- Starr
- Stephens
- Sterling
- Stonewall
- Sutton
- Swisher
- Tarrant
- Taylor
- Terrell
- Terry
- Throckmorton
- Titus
- Tom Green
- Travis
- Trinity
- Tyler
- Upshur
- Upton
- Uvalde
- Val Verde
- Van Zandt
- Victoria
- Walker
- Waller
- Ward
- Washington
- Webb
- Wharton
- Wheeler
- Wichita
- Wilbarger
- Willacy
- Williamson
- Wilson
- Winkler
- Wise
- Wood
- Yoakum
- Young
- Zavala