Clay County is located in north-central Texas, along the Red River near the Oklahoma border, within the Texoma region. Established in 1852 and organized in 1861, the county was named for Henry Clay and developed around agriculture, ranching, and small trade centers tied to regional rail and highway corridors. Clay County is small in population (about 10,000 residents) and is predominantly rural, with most communities centered on Wichita Falls’ broader economic sphere to the southwest. The landscape consists of rolling plains, ranchlands, and river- and creek-drained terrain typical of the Cross Timbers and adjacent prairie regions. Economic activity remains oriented toward agriculture and related services, with local government, education, and small businesses providing additional employment. The county seat is Henrietta, which serves as the administrative hub for county courts and public services.

Clay County Local Demographic Profile

Clay County is located in north-central Texas, bordering the Red River region and anchored by the county seat of Henrietta. The county is part of the Wichita Falls metropolitan area influence zone and sits between the Dallas–Fort Worth region and the Texas Panhandle.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Clay County, Texas, Clay County had an estimated population of 10,105 (2023). The decennial census counted 10,218 (2020).

Age & Gender

Per the U.S. Census Bureau’s data.census.gov (American Community Survey 5-year profiles for Clay County, Texas), the population is distributed across standard age cohorts (under 18, 18–64, and 65+), and the county’s sex composition is reported as shares of male and female residents. Exact age and sex percentages vary by ACS release year; the most current county profile tables on data.census.gov provide the official values for the selected vintage.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Clay County, Texas, Clay County’s population is reported by race categories (including White, Black or African American, American Indian and Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, and Two or More Races) and by ethnicity (Hispanic or Latino, of any race). QuickFacts provides county-level percentage shares for each category for the most recent available year.

Household & Housing Data

The U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Clay County, Texas provides county-level measures commonly used in local profiles, including:

  • Households (count and average persons per household)
  • Owner-occupied housing rate
  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units
  • Median gross rent
  • Housing unit counts and related indicators

For local government and planning resources, visit the Clay County, Texas official website.

Email Usage

Clay County, Texas is a largely rural county with low population density, which generally increases the cost per household of fixed broadband buildout and can constrain always-on connectivity needed for frequent email use.

Direct county-level email usage statistics are not typically published; email adoption is commonly inferred from digital access proxies such as broadband subscriptions, device availability, and age structure. Clay County’s indicators should be summarized using the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey tables for computer ownership and internet subscriptions and age/sex distributions (see the U.S. Census Bureau data portal and American Community Survey documentation).

Age distribution matters because older populations tend to show lower rates of adoption of newer digital communication tools, while working-age populations typically sustain higher routine email use for employment, school, and services. Gender distribution is usually less predictive of email use than age, education, and connectivity, but it is available in ACS demographic profiles.

Connectivity limitations are best captured through broadband availability/technology mix and provider coverage (see the FCC National Broadband Map) and local infrastructure context from Clay County government.

Mobile Phone Usage

Clay County is a rural county in north Texas along the Red River, part of the Wichita Falls metropolitan area but dominated by low-density settlement outside its small towns (including Henrietta, the county seat). The terrain is generally flat to gently rolling prairie and river-bottom areas, which supports wide-area radio propagation but does not eliminate coverage gaps driven by distance from towers, backhaul availability, and sparse population. These rural characteristics tend to produce sharper differences between network availability (where service can be delivered) and household adoption (who subscribes and uses it) than in urban counties.

Network availability vs. household adoption (important distinction)

Network availability refers to where mobile providers report coverage (voice/LTE/5G) and where fixed broadband is available. Household adoption refers to whether households actually subscribe to mobile and/or home internet service and use mobile internet.

County-specific household mobile adoption metrics are limited in commonly published federal datasets; most public indicators are statewide, regional, or are modeled estimates. County-level network availability is more commonly published via coverage maps and broadband availability datasets.

Mobile penetration or access indicators (where available)

Household internet subscription and “cellular data only” (best public proxy, not a direct mobile-penetration rate)

The most standardized public measure related to mobile-only reliance is the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) indicator for households with an internet subscription, including those with “cellular data plan” and “cellular data plan only.” Clay County-specific figures can be retrieved via the ACS 5‑year tables (coverage and margins of error can be substantial in small counties).

Limitation: ACS internet subscription tables measure household subscription types, not individual mobile phone ownership, and do not distinguish among mobile network generations (4G vs. 5G). Small-area estimates also carry wider uncertainty.

Broadband availability context (county-level, but not adoption)

Federal broadband availability datasets provide context for why some households may rely more heavily on mobile data (or have constrained connectivity options).

Limitation: Availability does not equate to service quality indoors, affordability, or willingness/ability to subscribe.

Mobile internet usage patterns (4G, 5G availability)

4G LTE availability

In rural north Texas counties such as Clay County, 4G LTE is typically the baseline mobile broadband layer used for smartphone internet access across most populated corridors and towns. Provider-reported LTE coverage can be reviewed on federal and carrier maps, with the FCC map offering a standardized interface.

Limitation: FCC mobile availability is based on provider submissions and standardized modeling; it does not directly measure real-world speeds at a specific address and can differ from on-the-ground performance, especially at cell edges and indoors.

5G availability (and common rural pattern)

5G availability in rural counties is commonly uneven:

  • Low-band 5G may extend beyond towns along major roads due to longer range.
  • Mid-band and high-capacity 5G (where deployed) tends to be concentrated in denser population centers because it requires more sites and stronger backhaul.

Clay County’s specific 5G footprint varies by provider and is best validated on the FCC map and carrier coverage maps rather than generalized statements.

Limitation: Public sources generally report 5G “availability” rather than consistent 5G “usage.” County-level statistics on the share of traffic carried on 5G vs. LTE are not typically published by providers.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

Smartphones as the primary access device (general pattern; county-level device mix not directly published)

In the United States, smartphones are the dominant mobile endpoint for consumer mobile internet use, while secondary devices include tablets, hotspots, and laptops connected via tethering. Clay County-specific device-type shares (smartphone vs. basic phone vs. hotspot) are not routinely published in a county-resolved, official federal series.

The most comparable public data tends to be:

  • National/state survey research (often not county-resolved), and

  • ACS household internet subscription types (which can indicate cellular-data-plan reliance but not the exact device category).

  • ACS access point (for “cellular data plan” subscription types): data.census.gov

Limitation: No widely used public dataset provides a definitive county-level breakdown of smartphones vs. non-smartphones.

Demographic or geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity

Rural settlement patterns and tower economics

  • Low population density increases the cost per served user for cell sites and backhaul, which can reduce the number of towers and the redundancy of coverage.
  • Distance to population centers affects how quickly newer radio technologies and fiber backhaul are deployed.
  • Road-centric coverage emphasis is common in rural areas, where coverage is strongest near highways and towns and weaker in remote farm and ranch areas.

County geography and jurisdictional context:

Indoor coverage and terrain/vegetation

Clay County’s generally open terrain can support wide-area coverage, but indoor signal strength can still be limited by building materials and distance to the serving site. River-bottom areas and tree cover can introduce localized attenuation, though topographic shielding is typically less pronounced than in mountainous regions.

Age, income, and education (adoption factors; best measured via ACS)

Household adoption of mobile and home internet correlates strongly with:

  • Income and poverty status (affordability of plans/devices),
  • Age structure (older populations often show lower rates of broadband adoption),
  • Educational attainment (correlates with digital adoption and work/education needs).

Clay County-specific demographic context is available through the ACS and decennial census profiles:

Limitation: These demographic relationships are well-established nationally, but county-level causal attribution is not provided in official statistics; the ACS supports correlation analysis rather than direct causation.

What can be stated definitively with public county-level sources (and what cannot)

  • Definitively available at county/geography level: provider-reported mobile network availability (LTE/5G) via the FCC National Broadband Map.
  • Definitively available as a household adoption proxy: ACS household internet subscription types, including cellular data plan and cellular data plan only, via data.census.gov.
  • Not definitively available in standard public county tables: a true mobile phone penetration rate (share of individuals with a mobile phone), device-type mix (smartphone vs. feature phone), and county-level 4G vs. 5G traffic/usage shares. These metrics typically exist in proprietary carrier analytics or commercial measurement products rather than official county-resolved publications.

Social Media Trends

Clay County is a rural county in North Texas along the Red River, with Henrietta as the county seat and smaller communities such as Bellevue and Byers. The local economy is shaped by agriculture, oil and gas activity, and regional commuting to larger job centers in Wichita Falls and the Dallas–Fort Worth sphere, a profile that typically aligns with high reliance on mobile connectivity, Facebook-centric community information sharing, and comparatively lower use of some emerging platforms than in large metropolitan counties.

User statistics (penetration / active use)

  • County-specific social media penetration rates are not published in standard federal statistical series. Most credible estimates for a county this size are derived by applying state/national benchmarks to local demographics.
  • Nationally, about 7 in 10 U.S. adults use at least one social media site according to the Pew Research Center social media fact sheet. This serves as the most-cited baseline for “any social media” penetration.
  • Texas generally tracks close to national patterns on broad internet and social platform adoption; in rural counties, adoption is often shaped more by age structure and broadband/mobile constraints than by state differences.

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

Pew’s U.S. adult patterns provide the most reliable age gradient for interpreting Clay County:

  • 18–29: highest overall social media usage; also the highest concentration on Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and X use relative to older groups. Source: Pew Research Center.
  • 30–49: high usage overall, with strong Facebook adoption and meaningful Instagram use.
  • 50–64: majority usage, dominated by Facebook; lower adoption of Snapchat/TikTok.
  • 65+: lowest usage overall, but Facebook remains comparatively strong among users in this age band.

Given Clay County’s rural profile and typical rural age mix (often older than major metros), Facebook use commonly over-indexes as a local information channel (community updates, schools, churches, local events).

Gender breakdown

National survey results indicate modest but consistent gender differences by platform:

  • Overall social media use: men and women are relatively close, with platform-specific differences more pronounced than “any social media” differences. Source: Pew Research Center.
  • More female-skewed platforms: Pinterest and (to a lesser extent) Instagram.
  • More male-skewed platforms: YouTube and Reddit tend to skew male in many surveys; X has also been reported as more male than female in Pew breakdowns.

Most-used platforms (percent using, U.S. adults)

County-level platform shares are not released in major public datasets; the most reputable reference percentages are national:

  • YouTube: ~83% of U.S. adults
  • Facebook: ~68%
  • Instagram: ~47%
  • Pinterest: ~35%
  • TikTok: ~33%
  • LinkedIn: ~30%
  • X (Twitter): ~22%
  • Snapchat: ~27%
  • WhatsApp: ~23%
    Source: Pew Research Center, Social Media Fact Sheet (latest estimates shown on the fact sheet).

Interpretation commonly applied to rural North Texas counties:

  • Facebook + YouTube typically function as the most pervasive platforms across age groups.
  • Instagram/TikTok/Snapchat skew younger and are less dominant in older, rural populations than in large urban counties.
  • LinkedIn usage is present but generally more tied to professional/commuter segments and higher educational attainment concentrations.

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)

  • Community information behavior: Rural counties frequently use Facebook groups/pages for local news, school and sports updates, church/community events, and buy/sell activity; this aligns with Facebook’s broad reach among adults and strong utility for local networks (Pew platform reach: Pew).
  • Video-first consumption: YouTube’s very high national penetration (~83%) supports heavy reliance on video for how-to content, entertainment, and news explainers, especially where long-form viewing complements limited local media ecosystems.
  • Age-driven platform segmentation: Younger adults concentrate time in TikTok/Instagram/Snapchat, while older adults concentrate usage in Facebook; this increases cross-platform fragmentation in households and community organizations.
  • Messaging and coordination: SMS remains foundational in many rural areas, while social DMs/Messenger are commonly used for group coordination; WhatsApp penetration is meaningful nationally but is often less central than Messenger in many U.S. rural communities (platform reach reference: Pew).
  • Engagement cadence: Local organizations and small businesses in rural markets often see higher relative engagement on fewer platforms (especially Facebook) rather than diffuse engagement across many platforms, reflecting the concentration of reachable audiences.

Family & Associates Records

Clay County, Texas maintains family and associate-related public records primarily through the County Clerk, District Clerk, and local vital records registrars. Birth and death records are vital records; certified copies are generally issued by the local registrar or the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS). Clay County also records marriage licenses and files certain probate records (including guardianship and estate matters) that can document family relationships. Divorce case files are handled through the district courts and maintained by the District Clerk. Adoption records are typically sealed by law and are not available as public records.

Public databases for Clay County commonly include online property and deed indexes, assumed-name filings, and some court record search tools, depending on the office and vendor. County-level access points include the Clay County Clerk and Clay County District Clerk pages. Statewide vital record ordering and eligibility rules are provided by Texas DSHS Vital Statistics.

Residents access many records in person at the relevant clerk’s office; copies are provided for applicable fees. Some records are accessible online through linked portals from county office pages, while older volumes and certified vital records often require in-person or mail processing.

Privacy restrictions commonly apply to vital records (limited-access periods), juvenile matters, sealed adoptions, and certain sensitive court filings.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

  • Marriage licenses (and marriage applications/returns)
    Clay County records marriages through a marriage license issued by the Clay County Clerk. After the ceremony, the officiant’s completed return is filed with the clerk, creating the recorded marriage record.

  • Divorce records (district court case files and divorce decrees)
    Divorces are handled as civil cases in the district court serving Clay County. The court’s final order is a divorce decree, which is part of the court case file.

  • Annulments
    Annulments are court proceedings filed in the district court. The final order (annulment decree/judgment) is recorded within the case file similarly to a divorce.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

  • Marriage records

    • Filed/maintained by: Clay County Clerk (county-level vital records for marriages).
    • Access methods:
      • In-person request at the county clerk’s office for certified copies or plain copies (availability varies by record type and office policy).
      • Written/mail requests are commonly accepted by Texas county clerks; local procedures and fees are set by the clerk’s office.
      • Some older indexes/images may be available through third-party public record platforms or archival microfilm, depending on the time period.

  • Divorce and annulment court records

    • Filed/maintained by: District Clerk (official custodian of district court case records).
    • Access methods:
      • In-person review of non-confidential case files at the district clerk’s office and purchase of copies; certified copies of decrees are issued by the district clerk.
      • Statewide court record availability and online access vary by county and case; some docket information may be accessible electronically, while full documents may require clerk access due to privacy rules and redactions.

  • State-level vital statistics (verification and some copies)

    • Texas maintains statewide vital statistics systems through the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) Vital Statistics. DSHS provides marriage/divorce verification services and, for certain years and eligibility categories, certified copies.
    • Reference: Texas DSHS Vital Statistics

Typical information included in these records

  • Marriage license/record (county clerk)

    • Full names of the parties
    • Date the license was issued and county of issuance
    • Age/date of birth (varies by era and form), residence, and identification/verification details (may be summarized rather than fully reproduced on certified copies)
    • Officiant name/title and date/place of ceremony (as returned/recorded)
    • License number, clerk certification, and recording information

  • Divorce decree (district court)

    • Names of the parties and cause/case number
    • Court and judicial district, dates of filing and final judgment
    • Findings and orders dissolving the marriage
    • Orders on property division, debts, and name change (when applicable)
    • Orders regarding children (conservatorship/custody, visitation/possession, child support) when applicable
    • Signatures, court seal, and certification language on certified copies

  • Annulment judgment/decree (district court)

    • Parties’ names, case number, and court identifiers
    • Findings establishing grounds for annulment and order declaring the marriage void or voidable as determined by the court
    • Any related orders (property, name change, and matters involving children where applicable)
    • Judge’s signature and certification elements on certified copies

Privacy or legal restrictions

  • Public access baseline

    • Texas treats many county and court records as public records, but access is limited by statutes, court rules, and confidentiality orders.

  • Confidential information and redaction

    • Court records commonly contain information subject to restriction or redaction (for example, certain personal identifiers). Clerks may restrict inspection of specific documents or provide redacted copies consistent with Texas law and court rules.

  • Restricted case types and sealed records

    • Some family law matters and related filings may be confidential by law or sealed by court order (for example, cases involving protective orders, certain information about minors, or sensitive reports). In such instances, only authorized parties or their representatives may obtain non-public documents.

  • Certified copies and identity/eligibility requirements

    • County clerks and district clerks generally require payment of statutory fees and may require requester identification for certified copies.
    • State-issued vital record products (through DSHS) are governed by state eligibility rules for certain certified records and verifications.

  • Use limitations

    • Certified copies are the standard format used for legal purposes (such as proving marriage status or documenting a divorce). Non-certified copies may be provided for informational use when permitted by the custodian’s policies and applicable law.

Education, Employment and Housing

Clay County is in North Texas along the Red River, with Wichita Falls (in adjacent Wichita County) serving as the nearest regional employment, medical, and retail hub. The county is predominantly rural with small towns (including Henrietta, the county seat) and a dispersed population pattern typical of the Texoma region; community context is shaped by agriculture/ranching, energy services, and commuting ties to the Wichita Falls metro area.

Education Indicators

Public schools and districts (names)

Clay County’s public K–12 education is primarily provided by independent school districts (ISDs) serving small communities and rural areas. School counts and campus lists can change with consolidations and grade-span adjustments; the most reliable current campus rosters are maintained by district and state directories. Districts serving Clay County include:

  • Henrietta ISD (Henrietta)
  • Byers ISD (Byers)
  • Bellevue ISD (Bellevue)
  • Midway ISD (Clay County) (rural area near Henrietta; not to be confused with other Texas “Midway ISD” entities)

For the most current school/campus names and grade configurations, use the Texas Education Agency’s district and campus directory (filter by county and district): Texas Education Agency school district locator.

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratios (countywide): A single countywide ratio is not consistently published as an “official” statistic because staffing and enrollment are reported at the district/campus level. Rural North Texas districts commonly operate with lower student–teacher ratios than large urban districts due to smaller enrollments; the most recent district-level ratios and staffing are available in TEA’s district/campus profile reports.
  • Graduation rates: Graduation rates are reported by TEA at the district and campus level (and can vary meaningfully between small districts year to year due to cohort size). The most recent accountability and graduation data are provided through TEA’s public reporting tools: Texas school report cards (TXSchools.gov).

Proxy note: Where a single countywide figure is required for planning, regional comparisons typically use TEA district-level reports aggregated across local ISDs; no universally adopted county roll-up is published in the same way as district accountability metrics.

Adult educational attainment (population 25+)

Adult attainment for Clay County is published through the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS). The standard indicators referenced are:

  • High school graduate or higher
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher

The most recent ACS 5-year estimates for Clay County can be accessed via:

Availability note: Because Clay County is sparsely populated, the ACS 5-year series is generally the most stable “most recent” estimate for education levels.

Notable programs (STEM, CTE/vocational, AP/dual credit)

Texas public high schools commonly offer:

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE) pathways aligned to state endorsements (e.g., agriculture/animal science, business/industry trades, health science, information technology), often delivered through a combination of on-campus labs and regional shared services.
  • Dual credit through nearby community colleges and Advanced Placement (AP) offerings where staffing and enrollment support it.

Program availability varies by district size. The most current catalog of CTE pathways, dual-credit partnerships, and AP course participation is typically documented in each district’s course guide and in TEA public profiles on TXSchools.gov.

School safety measures and counseling resources

Texas districts are required to follow state school safety planning standards and typically implement:

  • Controlled access/secured entry, visitor check-in procedures, and surveillance in common areas
  • Emergency operations plans, drills (fire, lockdown, severe weather), and coordination with local law enforcement
  • Student support services, commonly including school counseling; in small rural districts, specialized services (e.g., school psychologists, licensed clinical providers) are often shared regionally or contracted.

State-level requirements and guidance are summarized by TEA’s school safety resources: TEA school safety information. District-specific counseling and mental-health resource availability is typically listed on district websites and in student handbooks.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent)

County unemployment is tracked monthly by the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (LAUS). The most recent annual average and recent monthly values for Clay County are available through:

Availability note: A single “most recent year” rate depends on the latest completed calendar year of annual averages; TWC provides the clearest county series for Texas.

Major industries and employment sectors

Clay County’s employment base reflects a rural North Texas mix, with common sector concentrations in:

  • Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting (ranching, hay/forage, related services)
  • Construction and repair/maintenance trades
  • Retail trade and accommodation/food services concentrated in towns and highway-serving businesses
  • Public administration, education, and health care/social assistance as core local-service employers
  • Oil and gas–related services and regional energy supply-chain activity (more cyclical and often tied to broader basin conditions)

Industry composition and employment estimates are available via:

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

Occupational patterns in rural North Texas counties typically show higher shares of:

  • Transportation and material moving, construction/extraction, and installation/maintenance/repair
  • Office/administrative support, sales, and service occupations
  • A smaller but steady base of management, education, and health care practitioners/support

The most recent county estimates are published in ACS occupational tables (commonly S2401 and related detailed tables) on data.census.gov.

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

Clay County has a meaningful commuter relationship to the Wichita Falls area and other nearby employment centers. Typical rural commuting characteristics include:

  • Predominantly driving alone as the main mode of transportation
  • Limited fixed-route transit
  • Mean commute times that often fall in the 20–30 minute range in comparable rural North Texas counties (county-specific mean commute time is reported by ACS)

The most recent Clay County commuting indicators (mode share, mean travel time to work, and work location) are available in ACS commuting tables on data.census.gov.

Local employment vs out-of-county work

Rural counties frequently have:

  • A sizable share of residents who work outside the county (especially to nearby urban centers)
  • Local employment concentrated in public services, schools, health care, retail, and trades

The ACS “Place of Work” indicators (live/work in same county vs different county) are the standard source for Clay County’s resident workforce geography; access via data.census.gov.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership vs rental

Clay County’s housing tenure is reported by the ACS and typically shows higher homeownership than large Texas metros due to rural housing stock and lower density. The most recent homeownership and rental shares are available via:

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median home value: Reported by ACS as median value of owner-occupied housing units. In rural North Texas counties, median values are generally below major Texas metro medians, with slower price appreciation and higher sensitivity to interest rates and local inventory.
  • Recent trends: Transaction-based trend measures (year-over-year sales prices) are not consistently available as an official county statistic from ACS; they are often tracked by private real estate datasets. The most defensible public “most recent” median value is the ACS 5-year estimate.

County median home value data is available via data.census.gov (search “Clay County, Texas median home value”).

Typical rent prices

ACS reports:

  • Median gross rent (including utilities in many cases, depending on reporting) Rents in rural counties are often driven by limited multifamily supply and a larger share of single-family rentals and manufactured housing.

Clay County median gross rent is available via ACS median gross rent tables.

Types of housing

Clay County’s housing stock is characteristically:

  • Single-family detached homes in small towns (Henrietta and other communities)
  • Manufactured housing and rural homesteads on acreage
  • Rural lots and ranch properties with agricultural use components
  • Limited apartment inventory, typically small-scale rather than large complexes

This composition is reflected in ACS structure-type tables on data.census.gov.

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools/amenities)

  • Town-centered neighborhoods generally have shorter trips to schools, parks, city services, and local retail, while rural areas involve longer driving distances and greater reliance on highways and county roads.
  • School campuses and community facilities in small towns often serve as primary activity centers (sports facilities, auditoriums, community events), making proximity to the ISD campuses a common locational preference in town.

Data limitation note: Quantified walkability/transit accessibility metrics are not consistently published as official countywide indicators for rural Texas counties.

Property tax overview (rate and typical homeowner cost)

Property taxes in Texas are levied by overlapping local jurisdictions (county, school districts, cities, and special districts). Clay County homeowners commonly face:

  • A combined effective tax rate shaped heavily by the school district M&O/I&S rates
  • Annual tax bills that vary widely with property value and exemptions (homestead, over-65/disabled)

Public, authoritative sources for local rates and levy details include:

Proxy note: A single “average rate” for the entire county is not a fixed figure because rates differ by ISD and taxing unit; the most accurate approach is reporting by the specific property’s taxing jurisdictions using appraisal district records and the Texas Comptroller’s rate information.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Texas