Lampasas County Local Demographic Profile
Lampasas County, Texas — key demographics
Population size
- Total population: 23,700 (2024 Census Bureau estimate)
- Growth: Up roughly 9–10% since the 2020 Census count of 21,627
Age
- Median age: ~40 years
- Under 18: ~24%
- 65 and over: ~19–20%
Gender
- Female: ~49%
- Male: ~51%
Race and ethnicity
- Non-Hispanic White: ~69%
- Hispanic or Latino (of any race): ~22%
- Non-Hispanic Black: ~3%
- Non-Hispanic Asian: ~1%
- Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native: ~1%
- Non-Hispanic Two or more races: ~4%
- Other non-Hispanic: <1%
Households and housing
- Households: ~8,800
- Average household size: ~2.6–2.7 persons
- Family households: ~70% (married-couple households ~52%)
- Households with children under 18: ~30%
- One-person households: ~23%
- Owner-occupied: ~75%; renter-occupied: ~25%
- Total housing units: ~9,900
Insights
- The county is growing steadily post-2020, skews slightly older than the Texas median, has high owner-occupancy, and a majority non-Hispanic White population with a sizeable Hispanic community.
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau (Vintage 2024 county population estimates; 2019–2023 American Community Survey 5-year estimates)
Email Usage in Lampasas County
Lampasas County, TX — email usage snapshot
- Population and density: 21,627 residents (2020 Census) over ~714 sq mi ≈ 30 people/sq mi; most residents cluster in the City of Lampasas and the Copperas Cove fringe, with large rural tracts elsewhere.
- Estimated email users: ≈15,000 residents age 13+ use email regularly (about 70% of the total population), derived from local broadband availability and U.S. email adoption norms.
- Age distribution of email users:
- 13–17: 6%
- 18–34: 25%
- 35–54: 32%
- 55–64: 15%
- 65+: 22%
- Gender split among users: ~50% female, ~50% male, tracking the county’s near-even sex ratio.
- Digital access and trends:
- ≈85% of households have a broadband subscription; ≈92–94% have a computer device (ACS S2801, multi‑year).
- Smartphone use is pervasive (≈85–90% of adults), supporting mobile email; some rural households are mobile‑only for internet.
- Connectivity is strongest in Lampasas/Copperas Cove areas with cable/fiber options; unincorporated areas often rely on fixed wireless or satellite. 5G/4G covers primary corridors (US‑190/US‑183), with spotty coverage in low‑density hill country. Insights: High device and broadband access underpin robust email adoption; older-adult participation is substantial due to rising smartphone use, while sparsely populated zones see more mobile and fixed‑wireless reliance.
Mobile Phone Usage in Lampasas County
Lampasas County, TX — mobile phone usage summary (2024)
User estimates
- Resident base: 21,627 (2020 Census). Adults (18+) ≈ 16,600.
- Adults with a mobile phone (of any kind): ≈ 15,800 (applying ~95% adult mobile-phone ownership observed in recent national/state surveys).
- Adult smartphone users: ≈ 13,600 (applying an 82% rural-adult smartphone adoption rate; Texas statewide is closer to ~88–90%).
- Mobile-only home internet reliance: estimated 24–30% of households use a cellular data plan as their primary or only home internet connection, above the Texas average (~17–20%). This is consistent with rural infrastructure profiles and observed ACS patterns for similar counties.
Demographic breakdown and usage patterns
- Age: The county skews older than Texas overall, which pulls smartphone adoption below the state rate.
- 18–34: very high smartphone adoption (mid-90%s); heavy app, social, and video use.
- 35–64: high adoption (upper-80s to low-90%s); strong use of productivity, navigation, and commerce apps.
- 65+: lower adoption (mid-60s to mid-70%s), but growing; larger share on basic Android/iPhone models and voice/text-first plans.
- Income and plan type: Median incomes trail the Texas median, and wired alternatives are thinner outside town centers. This drives:
- Higher prepaid/MVNO penetration than the Texas average.
- Above-average mobile-only internet use for the home, especially among lower-income and renter households.
- Veterans and military-adjacent users: A notably higher share of veterans than Texas overall (reflecting proximity to Fort Cavazos/Killeen). This translates to:
- Greater uptake of carriers with strong military discounts/support.
- Higher device churn among working-age adults tied to duty cycles and employer device programs.
- Race/ethnicity: The county’s Hispanic share is markedly lower than Texas statewide (~40% statewide). Because Hispanic adults in Texas report high smartphone reliance, Lampasas’ lower Hispanic share partly explains its slightly lower smartphone penetration and app-based communications intensity compared with the state.
Digital infrastructure points
- Macro coverage
- All three national carriers (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile) operate across the county. 5G low-band coverage reaches population centers and major corridors (US-190, US-281, TX-183); mid-band 5G is strongest in/near Lampasas and along the US-190 corridor and thins in ranchland and river-valley areas.
- Coverage gaps persist on lightly populated FM roads and in hilly/limestone terrain, producing occasional dead zones and indoor signal variability outside town centers.
- Performance
- 5G performance is adequate for typical consumer use but trails Texas metro norms. Expect lower median 5G speeds and greater variability than urban Texas (especially off-corridor), with LTE fallback common in fringe areas.
- Backhaul and tower density
- Sites cluster around Lampasas, Kempner, Lometa, and along US-190/US-281. Rural spacing between sites is wider than in Texas metros, which contributes to capacity constraints at peak times and slower mid-band 5G expansion.
- Home and community access alternatives
- Cable internet (DOCSIS) is available in the city of Lampasas (e.g., Vyve Broadband) with gigabit-class tiers.
- Fiber is present in limited pockets via regional providers and co-ops; availability falls off outside towns.
- Fixed wireless (e.g., WISPs) and 5G home internet (notably from T-Mobile; Verizon in select areas) cover many areas beyond cable/fiber reach.
- Satellite internet (including Starlink) is widely accessible and used as a backstop in sparse zones.
- Public-safety and resiliency
- FirstNet (AT&T) coverage extends across primary corridors and population centers, improving emergency communications reliability relative to commercial-only service in rural stretches.
How Lampasas County differs from Texas overall
- Smartphone penetration: 5–8 percentage points lower than the Texas average, driven by older age structure and rural coverage/performance constraints.
- Mobile-only internet: Meaningfully higher share of households rely on cellular as primary home internet compared with statewide, reflecting limited wired options beyond town centers.
- Plan mix: Higher prepaid/MVNO share and smaller share on premium unlimited plans than in metro Texas.
- Network quality: More frequent LTE fallback and slower median 5G speeds than state urban benchmarks; coverage gaps remain in low-density areas despite broad low-band 5G footprints.
- Demographics: Lower Hispanic share and higher veteran share than Texas overall, shaping device/plan choices (military discounts, BYOD) and slightly different app usage patterns.
Method notes
- Counts are derived by applying recent rural and statewide adoption rates (Pew/NTIA/industry benchmarks) to the 2020 Census adult population for Lampasas County. The mobile-only home-internet estimate reflects ACS patterns for similar rural Texas counties and observed provider footprints in Lampasas County.
Social Media Trends in Lampasas County
Lampasas County, TX — Social Media Snapshot (2025)
Population baseline and access
- Population: ~23,000 residents (ACS 2023 estimate). Adults (18+): ~76% of residents.
- Internet access: ~80–85% of households have home internet; smartphone ownership among adults ~85–90% (rural-Texas benchmarks).
Overall social media usage (13+)
- Users: ~70–75% of residents 13+ use social media, equal to roughly 15,500–17,000 people.
- Daily users: ~62–66% of residents 13+.
- Time spent: Typical daily use 1.5–2.5 hours; heavier among under-30.
Age-group adoption (share of each age group using social media)
- Teens 13–17: 92–95%
- 18–29: 85–90%
- 30–44: 80–85%
- 45–64: 68–74%
- 65+: 45–52%
Gender breakdown (share of county social media users)
- Female: 51–53%
- Male: 47–49%
Most-used platforms in Lampasas County (share of social media users, monthly; daily in parentheses)
- YouTube: 78–84% (55–60% daily)
- Facebook: 76–82% (55–60% daily)
- Instagram: 36–42% (22–26% daily)
- TikTok: 30–36% (20–24% daily)
- Pinterest: 26–32% (12–16% daily; majority female)
- Snapchat: 22–28% (15–20% daily; concentrated under 30)
- WhatsApp: 12–18% (8–12% daily; family/church groups)
- X (Twitter): 12–16% (6–9% daily)
- LinkedIn: 10–14% (3–6% daily)
- Nextdoor: 6–10% (2–4% daily; most active around city limits)
Behavioral trends and content patterns
- Community-first usage: Extremely high engagement in Facebook Groups for local news, school updates (Lampasas Badgers), public safety, and buy/sell/trade. County and city agency pages see strong reach during weather, wildfire, and road-closure events.
- Marketplace and small business: Facebook Marketplace is a primary commerce channel for ranch/farm equipment, vehicles, household goods; local boutiques, trades, and home services use Facebook and Instagram for promotions and lead-gen.
- Video-driven discovery: Short-form video (Reels/TikTok) is the fastest-growing format for events, food spots, outdoor recreation, and youth activities; YouTube dominates for how-to/DIY, hunting/fishing, and equipment reviews.
- Event-centric spikes: Fairs, rodeos, youth sports, and church events drive predictable peaks in mentions, shares, and live streams on Facebook.
- Timing: Engagement clusters before work (6–8 a.m.), lunch (11:30 a.m.–1 p.m.), and evenings (7–9 p.m.); Sunday late afternoon is strong for community and church content.
- Demographic skews:
- Under-30: Heaviest on TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram; high daily frequency and DM-based sharing.
- 30–49: Facebook + Instagram for parenting, school, and local commerce; strong Reels adoption.
- 50–64: Facebook Groups and Marketplace; YouTube for tutorials and local-interest content.
- 65+: Primarily Facebook for news, community, and family updates; moderate YouTube.
- Topic hotspots: Local governance (school board, property taxes), severe weather, high school athletics, hunting/land management, and regional jobs.
Notes on methodology
- Figures are county-level estimates derived from ACS population structure and 2024–2025 U.S. and rural-Texas social media adoption benchmarks (Pew and industry panels). They reflect likely usage in Lampasas County and are suitable for planning, targeting, and content strategy.
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Texas
- Anderson
- Andrews
- Angelina
- Aransas
- Archer
- Armstrong
- Atascosa
- Austin
- Bailey
- Bandera
- Bastrop
- Baylor
- Bee
- Bell
- Bexar
- Blanco
- Borden
- Bosque
- Bowie
- Brazoria
- Brazos
- Brewster
- Briscoe
- Brooks
- Brown
- Burleson
- Burnet
- Caldwell
- Calhoun
- Callahan
- Cameron
- Camp
- Carson
- Cass
- Castro
- Chambers
- Cherokee
- Childress
- Clay
- Cochran
- Coke
- Coleman
- Collin
- Collingsworth
- Colorado
- Comal
- Comanche
- Concho
- Cooke
- Coryell
- Cottle
- Crane
- Crockett
- Crosby
- Culberson
- Dallam
- Dallas
- Dawson
- De Witt
- Deaf Smith
- Delta
- Denton
- Dickens
- Dimmit
- Donley
- Duval
- Eastland
- Ector
- Edwards
- El Paso
- Ellis
- Erath
- Falls
- Fannin
- Fayette
- Fisher
- Floyd
- Foard
- Fort Bend
- Franklin
- Freestone
- Frio
- Gaines
- Galveston
- Garza
- Gillespie
- Glasscock
- Goliad
- Gonzales
- Gray
- Grayson
- Gregg
- Grimes
- Guadalupe
- Hale
- Hall
- Hamilton
- Hansford
- Hardeman
- Hardin
- Harris
- Harrison
- Hartley
- Haskell
- Hays
- Hemphill
- Henderson
- Hidalgo
- Hill
- Hockley
- Hood
- Hopkins
- Houston
- Howard
- Hudspeth
- Hunt
- Hutchinson
- Irion
- Jack
- Jackson
- Jasper
- Jeff Davis
- Jefferson
- Jim Hogg
- Jim Wells
- Johnson
- Jones
- Karnes
- Kaufman
- Kendall
- Kenedy
- Kent
- Kerr
- Kimble
- King
- Kinney
- Kleberg
- Knox
- La Salle
- Lamar
- Lamb
- Lavaca
- Lee
- Leon
- Liberty
- Limestone
- Lipscomb
- Live Oak
- Llano
- Loving
- Lubbock
- Lynn
- Madison
- Marion
- Martin
- Mason
- Matagorda
- Maverick
- Mcculloch
- Mclennan
- Mcmullen
- Medina
- Menard
- Midland
- Milam
- Mills
- Mitchell
- Montague
- Montgomery
- Moore
- Morris
- Motley
- Nacogdoches
- Navarro
- Newton
- Nolan
- Nueces
- Ochiltree
- Oldham
- Orange
- Palo Pinto
- Panola
- Parker
- Parmer
- Pecos
- Polk
- Potter
- Presidio
- Rains
- Randall
- Reagan
- Real
- Red River
- Reeves
- Refugio
- Roberts
- Robertson
- Rockwall
- Runnels
- Rusk
- Sabine
- San Augustine
- San Jacinto
- San Patricio
- San Saba
- Schleicher
- Scurry
- Shackelford
- Shelby
- Sherman
- Smith
- Somervell
- Starr
- Stephens
- Sterling
- Stonewall
- Sutton
- Swisher
- Tarrant
- Taylor
- Terrell
- Terry
- Throckmorton
- Titus
- Tom Green
- Travis
- Trinity
- Tyler
- Upshur
- Upton
- Uvalde
- Val Verde
- Van Zandt
- Victoria
- Walker
- Waller
- Ward
- Washington
- Webb
- Wharton
- Wheeler
- Wichita
- Wilbarger
- Willacy
- Williamson
- Wilson
- Winkler
- Wise
- Wood
- Yoakum
- Young
- Zapata
- Zavala