Red River County is located in Northeast Texas along the Oklahoma border, within the Ark-La-Tex region. The county is part of the historic Red River valley, an area shaped by early settlement patterns tied to river transportation and agriculture. Red River County is small in population, with roughly 12,000 residents, and is characterized by predominantly rural communities and low-density development. Its landscape includes rolling terrain, river bottoms, pastureland, and mixed forests typical of the western edge of the Piney Woods. The local economy has long centered on agriculture and related services, with ranching and timber resources also contributing to land use. Culturally, the county reflects regional East Texas and southern influences, with a strong emphasis on small-town civic institutions. The county seat is Clarksville, the largest community and primary center for government and local services.
Red River County Local Demographic Profile
Red River County is a rural county in Northeast Texas, part of the Ark-La-Tex region along the Oklahoma border. The county seat is Clarksville, and local government information is maintained through the Red River County official website.
Population Size
According to the U.S. Census Bureau’s data.census.gov (Decennial Census, 2020), Red River County, Texas had a total population of 11,587.
Age & Gender
County-level age distribution and sex composition are published by the U.S. Census Bureau in the Decennial Census (P.L. 94-171 Redistricting Data) and/or ACS 5-year profile tables. The most direct access point for these county tables is data.census.gov; select Red River County, Texas and use Age and Sex tables (e.g., “Sex by Age”).
A consolidated numeric breakdown is not provided here because the specific table selection (Decennial vs. ACS) and release year materially affects the results, and exact values must be pulled from the chosen Census table directly.
Racial & Ethnic Composition
County-level race and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity counts and shares are published by the U.S. Census Bureau in the 2020 Decennial Census. The authoritative county tables (e.g., “Race” and “Hispanic or Latino, and Not Hispanic or Latino by Race”) are available via data.census.gov by filtering geography to Red River County, Texas.
A single numeric breakdown is not listed here because multiple official race/ethnicity table variants exist (race alone, race in combination, Hispanic origin cross-tabs), and exact values depend on the selected table.
Household & Housing Data
Household counts, household type, occupancy, and housing characteristics for Red River County are published by the U.S. Census Bureau through the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates and are accessible through data.census.gov. Commonly used ACS tables include topics such as:
- Households and families (household type, family composition)
- Housing occupancy (occupied vs. vacant housing units)
- Owner/renter characteristics (tenure)
- Housing units and structure type (unit counts and building types)
Exact household and housing figures are not reproduced here because ACS table year and topic selection determine the official values; the authoritative county values are those shown in the selected ACS table on data.census.gov.
Email Usage
Red River County is a sparsely populated rural county in Northeast Texas, where longer last‑mile distances and fewer providers can constrain residential internet quality and reliability, shaping how often residents can use email for work, school, and services.
Direct county-level email usage statistics are not routinely published, so email adoption is inferred from proxy indicators reported by the U.S. Census Bureau (data.census.gov), especially household broadband subscriptions and computer access. These measures track the prerequisites for regular email use, particularly for attachments, account verification, and online forms.
Age composition also influences adoption: older populations tend to have lower rates of digital account use than prime working‑age adults, and Red River County’s age profile from the American Community Survey provides context for likely variation in email reliance across households.
Gender distribution is generally less predictive of email access than age and connectivity; county sex composition can be referenced through the ACS population tables.
Connectivity constraints in rural areas often include limited wired broadband availability and greater dependence on mobile or fixed wireless options; county context is available through the FCC National Broadband Map.
Mobile Phone Usage
Red River County is in far Northeast Texas along the Texas–Arkansas border, with a largely rural settlement pattern anchored by Clarksville (the county seat) and extensive agricultural and forested land. Low population density, long distances between cell sites, and tree cover can reduce signal reach and increase the likelihood of coverage gaps compared with urban Texas counties. These characteristics primarily affect network availability (where service can be delivered); they do not, by themselves, measure household adoption (whether residents subscribe and use mobile service at home).
Network availability (coverage) vs. adoption (subscriptions/usage)
Network availability refers to the presence and quality of mobile broadband coverage (e.g., 4G LTE or 5G) as reported by carriers and mapped by regulators.
Adoption refers to whether households or individuals actually subscribe to mobile service, have a smartphone, and use mobile internet for connectivity.
County-level availability can be assessed through coverage maps; county-level adoption is often not published in a single definitive metric and is commonly available only through survey-based estimates at broader geographies or via modeled datasets.
Mobile penetration / access indicators (where available)
- Smartphone and mobile subscription measures (county limitations): Public, county-specific estimates of smartphone ownership or mobile subscription rates are not consistently published as a single indicator for all U.S. counties. Standard federal surveys that measure internet subscriptions and device ownership (such as the American Community Survey) are typically more reliable at state or larger-area levels for device-specific measures, and small-area estimates can have higher uncertainty.
- Household internet subscription context: The U.S. Census Bureau provides internet subscription tables (including cellular data plans as a type of internet subscription) through the American Community Survey, but interpretation at small geographies requires attention to sampling and margins of error. Reference tables and methodology are available via the American Community Survey (Census.gov).
- Programmatic indicators (access vs. adoption): Eligibility and enrollment in affordability programs (historically including ACP) are sometimes used as indirect indicators of constrained affordability, but these are not direct measures of mobile penetration and may not be available in a consistent county series.
Data limitation: A single, authoritative “mobile penetration rate” (subscriptions per 100 people) is generally reported at national or state levels by industry sources, not as an official county statistic, and is not consistently available for Red River County from public, county-level datasets.
Mobile internet usage patterns and network types (4G/5G)
4G LTE availability (network availability)
- 4G LTE is broadly the baseline mobile broadband layer across rural Texas, including Northeast Texas counties. In rural counties such as Red River, LTE coverage often varies between communities and along highways versus more remote areas, with performance affected by tower spacing and terrain/vegetation.
- The most direct public source for carrier-reported mobile broadband coverage is the FCC’s map:
- The FCC National Broadband Map provides location-based views of mobile broadband availability by provider and technology, including 4G LTE and 5G, with multiple performance layers and a challenge process.
5G availability (network availability)
- 5G availability in rural counties is commonly more uneven than LTE, with coverage concentrated near population centers and along major corridors. Countywide 5G presence can coexist with significant non-5G areas due to the economics of rural deployment and the shorter propagation of some 5G spectrum bands.
- The FCC National Broadband Map is the primary public reference for checking whether 5G is reported at specific locations within Red River County and for distinguishing between “coverage shown” and “coverage experienced.”
Actual usage patterns (adoption/behavior)
- County-specific breakdowns of “mobile internet usage” (share of residents primarily using cellular data, mobile-only households, average data consumption) are not consistently published as official statistics at the county level.
- Survey-based measures that distinguish between “cellular data plan” subscriptions and other home internet types are available via Census tabulations, but interpretation at small geographies requires careful handling of uncertainty. See Census.gov computer and internet use for concepts and table access points.
Clear distinction: The FCC map indicates where mobile broadband is reported available (availability). It does not indicate how many households subscribe or how heavily they use mobile data (adoption/usage).
Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)
- Smartphones dominate mobile access nationally, with mobile broadband service generally consumed via smartphones rather than basic/feature phones, and tablets/hotspots used as secondary devices. However, county-specific device-type shares (smartphone vs. feature phone) are not typically available as an official statistic for Red River County.
- For device ownership and internet access concepts used in federal statistics (computer types, smartphone access in some survey contexts, and internet subscription categories), the definitional baseline is documented through the American Community Survey (Census.gov) and related “computer and internet use” materials on Census.gov.
Data limitation: Without a county-representative device survey explicitly publishing Red River County results, device-type statements are best limited to general patterns documented at larger geographies.
Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity
Geographic factors (availability and performance)
- Rural land use and low density: Larger distances between potential tower sites and fewer high-traffic commercial areas reduce incentives for dense site deployment, affecting signal strength consistency and 5G buildout intensity.
- Vegetation and terrain: Forested areas and rolling terrain typical of Northeast Texas can attenuate radio signals, especially at higher frequencies, contributing to localized coverage variability.
- Transportation corridors vs. interior areas: Coverage is often stronger near highways and towns than in sparsely populated interior areas, reflecting network design priorities.
Demographic and socioeconomic factors (adoption)
- Income and affordability: Lower household incomes are associated in many surveys with lower broadband adoption and greater reliance on mobile-only connectivity. County-level income and related demographic context are available through data.census.gov, though connecting these directly to mobile adoption requires caution because subscription choice is not determined by income alone.
- Age distribution: Older populations tend to have lower smartphone adoption and lower mobile-data reliance in many national surveys, which can affect county adoption patterns where the age profile skews older. County age distributions are available from data.census.gov.
- Housing dispersion: Dispersed housing increases the relative importance of mobile networks for some households where fixed wired broadband options are limited, but the presence of mobile coverage does not guarantee reliable indoor service or sufficient capacity.
Primary sources for Red River County–specific checks
- Mobile broadband availability by location and technology: FCC National Broadband Map
- County demographic and household characteristics relevant to adoption context (population density, age, income): data.census.gov and the American Community Survey (Census.gov)
- State broadband planning context and mapping initiatives: Texas Broadband Development Office (Texas Comptroller)
- Local government context: Red River County official website
Summary (availability vs. adoption)
- Availability: 4G LTE is generally the foundational mobile broadband layer in rural Northeast Texas, while 5G availability is typically more patchy outside towns and major routes. The definitive public, location-based reference for reported coverage is the FCC National Broadband Map.
- Adoption: County-level, definitive statistics for smartphone ownership and mobile-only internet reliance are not consistently published as a single measure for Red River County in public sources. Census tabulations provide household internet subscription categories and demographic context, but device-type and mobile usage intensity are not uniformly available at county resolution and can carry higher uncertainty in small-area estimates.
Social Media Trends
Red River County is a rural county in Northeast Texas along the Oklahoma border, with Clarksville as the county seat. The local economy is shaped by small-town services, agriculture, and regional commuting, and its lower population density and older age profile relative to major Texas metros tend to align with heavier reliance on Facebook, local-community Groups, and messaging for news, events, and person-to-person communication.
User statistics (penetration / active use)
- Local (county-specific) social media penetration: No routinely published, methodologically comparable dataset provides county-level social media penetration for Red River County; most authoritative tracking is reported at the national or state level.
- National benchmarks (adults):
- Social media use overall: About 7 in 10 U.S. adults (≈69%) report using at least one social media site (Pew Research Center, 2023). See Pew Research Center’s Social Media Use in 2023.
- Internet access as a constraint on social use: Adult social media participation closely tracks internet and smartphone access; for rural areas, access and coverage can be a limiting factor. See Pew Research Center internet/broadband fact sheet for national patterns that affect rural counties.
Age group trends (who uses social media most)
Using Pew’s national age patterning (commonly applied as a benchmark for rural counties in the absence of county-level measurement):
- Highest usage: 18–29 and 30–49 are the most likely to use social media (Pew, 2023).
- Moderate usage: 50–64 remains a majority on social platforms but below younger adults (Pew, 2023).
- Lowest usage: 65+ is the least likely group to use social media, though still a substantial minority (Pew, 2023).
- Platform-by-age tendency: Younger adults over-index on visually oriented and short-video platforms, while older adults over-index on Facebook for local news, family updates, and community groups (Pew, 2023).
Gender breakdown
- Overall social media adoption: Pew finds broad use across genders; differences are more pronounced by platform than by overall adoption (Pew, 2023).
- Typical platform skew (national):
- Women are more likely than men to use Pinterest and somewhat more likely to use Facebook and Instagram (platform differences documented by Pew).
- Men are more likely than women to use some discussion- and news-adjacent platforms (patterns vary by platform and year). Source: Pew Research Center’s Social Media Use in 2023 (platform-by-demographic tables).
Most-used platforms (benchmark percentages)
County-specific “most-used platform” shares are not published in a consistent public series; the most reliable available reference is Pew’s national platform usage among U.S. adults (2023):
- YouTube: ≈83%
- Facebook: ≈68%
- Instagram: ≈47%
- Pinterest: ≈35%
- TikTok: ≈33%
- LinkedIn: ≈30%
- WhatsApp: ≈29%
- Snapchat: ≈27%
- X (formerly Twitter): ≈22%
Source: Pew Research Center’s Social Media Use in 2023.
Behavioral trends (engagement patterns / preferences)
- Community-information orientation: In rural counties, engagement commonly concentrates around local events, school and sports updates, church/community announcements, and buy/sell activity, which are typically strongest on Facebook Pages and Groups.
- Video-first consumption: Nationally high YouTube penetration indicates broad video consumption across age groups; how-to content, entertainment, and local-interest videos are common engagement drivers (Pew, 2023).
- Messaging as a complement to feeds: Use of integrated messaging (e.g., Facebook Messenger and SMS-like apps) often functions as day-to-day communication alongside public posting; national benchmarks show substantial adoption of messaging-linked platforms such as WhatsApp (Pew, 2023).
- Age-differentiated engagement: Younger adults tend to show higher engagement on short-form video (notably TikTok) and visual platforms (Instagram/Snapchat), while older adults tend to show steadier engagement on Facebook for maintaining social ties and following local organizations (Pew, 2023).
Family & Associates Records
Red River County family and associate-related records are maintained through county and state offices. Texas vital events (birth and death certificates) are state records administered by the Texas Department of State Health Services Vital Statistics Section; local registration and some services are typically handled through the county clerk’s office for record filing and certified copies. Adoption records in Texas are generally confidential and handled through courts and state agencies; access is restricted under state law and court order processes.
Publicly searchable databases in Red River County primarily relate to property and court activity that can document family or associate connections (deeds, liens, probate, civil and criminal cases). The Red River County Clerk provides access to recorded instruments and other clerk-held records in person and may provide request procedures and fees on the county site: Red River County Clerk. County-level court information is managed by the District Clerk for district court case records: Red River County District Clerk.
Online access varies by record type and vendor; some records are viewable through linked portals, while certified vital records are ordered through the state: Texas Vital Statistics. Privacy restrictions commonly apply to recent birth records, adoption records, and certain court filings; certified copies require identity and eligibility verification under state rules.
Marriage & Divorce Records
Types of records available
Marriage licenses and marriage records
- Marriage licenses are issued at the county level and form part of the county’s marriage record once returned/recorded after the ceremony.
- Red River County maintains an index and recorded instruments for marriages filed in the county.
Divorce records
- Divorce decrees and related case documents are created in the district court case file and maintained as court records.
- Texas also maintains statewide divorce indexing and verification data through the state vital records office for many years (availability depends on reporting period).
Annulments
- Annulments are handled as civil cases in the district court. Records typically include an order or decree of annulment and associated pleadings, maintained in the court case file.
Where records are filed and how they can be accessed
Marriage records (county level)
- Filed and recorded with the Red River County Clerk (the official county recorder for marriage licenses/records).
- Access methods generally include:
- In-person searches and requests through the County Clerk’s office.
- Mail requests for certified or non-certified copies (requirements commonly include identifying details and fees).
- Some counties provide online indexes or third-party hosted search portals; availability varies by county and time period.
Divorce and annulment records (court level)
- Filed in the Red River County District Court and maintained by the District Clerk as part of the civil case file.
- Access methods generally include:
- In-person access to case files and docket information through the District Clerk’s office, subject to redaction and access rules.
- Copies (certified or non-certified) requested from the District Clerk.
- Some Texas courts provide online case search access through local systems; coverage and document availability vary.
State-level vital records (verification and indexes)
- The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), Vital Statistics maintains statewide vital event services, including marriage and divorce verification for eligible periods and record types.
- Official information: Texas DSHS Vital Statistics
Typical information included in these records
Marriage license / marriage record
- Full names of the parties
- Date the license was issued and county of issuance
- Place of marriage and date of ceremony (as recorded/returned)
- Officiant name and authority, and return/recording information
- Ages or dates of birth may appear depending on the form and era
- License number/book-page or instrument reference
Divorce decree (final judgment)
- Names of the parties and case number
- Court and county, judge’s name, and date signed
- Findings and orders dissolving the marriage
- Orders concerning children (conservatorship/custody, support) when applicable
- Division of property and allocation of debts
- Name changes, when ordered
- Ancillary orders may be included in associated filings (e.g., protective orders are typically separate proceedings but may be referenced)
Annulment order/decree
- Names of the parties and case number
- Court and county, judge’s signature date
- Legal basis for annulment (as reflected in pleadings/findings)
- Orders regarding children, support, and property issues where applicable
Privacy or legal restrictions
Public access framework
- Many marriage records and court records are public under Texas law, but access is subject to statutory confidentiality provisions, court rules, and redaction requirements.
Protected/confidential information
- Court records and recorded instruments may be redacted to remove sensitive data (commonly Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, financial account numbers, and certain information about minors).
- Some family-law-related materials can be sealed by court order or restricted by law, limiting public inspection of particular filings even when a case exists on the docket.
Certified copies and identification
- Certified copies are issued by the custodian office (County Clerk for marriage records; District Clerk for divorce/annulment court documents) under that office’s certification procedures and fee schedules.
- State vital records offices often provide verification letters or certified copies under eligibility rules established by statute and agency policy.
Vital records vs. court file
- State-level “verification” products generally confirm the fact of a marriage or divorce for a given period and may not reproduce the complete court file or recorded instrument.
Education, Employment and Housing
Red River County is a rural county in far Northeast Texas along the Texas–Arkansas line, anchored by Clarksville (the county seat) and a network of small towns and unincorporated communities. The county has an older-than-state-average age profile and a relatively low population density, with community life centered on public schools, local government services, agriculture/forestry activity, and small retail and health services in town hubs.
Education Indicators
Public schools (number and names)
Public K–12 education is provided through multiple independent school districts (ISDs). A consolidated, countywide count of “public schools” is not consistently published as a single figure in one official county document; the most reliable proxy is the campus listings on district and state accountability pages.
Commonly referenced public districts/campuses serving Red River County include:
- Clarksville ISD (Clarksville)
- Rivercrest ISD (serving areas around Bogata/Talco)
- Detroit ISD (Detroit)
- Avery ISD (Avery)
- Redwater ISD (serving parts of the county; district footprint also extends beyond the county)
Official district/campus rosters and accountability information are maintained by the state; see the Texas Education Agency (TEA) school accountability reports and the TXSchools.gov district and campus profiles for the most current campus names and totals.
Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates
- Student–teacher ratios (countywide): Not reported as a single countywide metric by TEA; ratios are typically reported at the district/campus level and vary with small-district enrollment. Rural Northeast Texas districts commonly operate with lower student–teacher ratios than the Texas statewide average due to smaller campus sizes; the most accurate figures are found in district profiles on TXSchools.gov.
- Graduation rates: TEA reports four-year graduation rates by district and campus (and by student group). In rural counties with small cohorts, year-to-year rates can fluctuate. District-specific graduation rates are available through TEA’s accountability reports.
Adult education levels
County adult educational attainment is best measured through the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS). The most recent ACS 5-year county tables provide:
- Share age 25+ with a high school diploma (or equivalent): available for Red River County in ACS “Educational Attainment” tables
- Share age 25+ with a bachelor’s degree or higher: available in the same ACS tables
Authoritative county percentages and counts are provided in the U.S. Census Bureau’s data.census.gov (ACS 5-year) for Red River County, TX. (A single-year ACS is not available for many small counties; the 5-year ACS is the standard most-recent source.)
Notable programs (STEM, CTE, AP/dual credit)
- Career and Technical Education (CTE): Texas public high schools commonly provide CTE pathways aligned to state endorsements (e.g., agriculture, health science, welding/manufacturing, business). District-specific program offerings are best documented in local course catalogs and TEA profiles.
- Advanced academics: Many rural districts offer dual credit through regional community colleges and may offer Advanced Placement (AP) on a smaller scale; offerings depend on staffing and student demand.
Program participation and course offerings are most reliably confirmed via district course guides and state profile pages on TXSchools.gov. A single countywide inventory is not published.
School safety measures and counseling resources
Texas districts operate under state safety requirements that generally include:
- Emergency operations plans, drills, controlled access procedures, and coordination with local law enforcement.
- Student support services, including school counseling; staffing levels vary by district size. District-level safety and counseling information is typically published in board policies, student handbooks, and campus improvement plans; TEA’s statewide framework and guidance are reflected through TEA Safe and Healthy Schools resources. A countywide consolidation of specific measures by campus is not issued as a single report.
Employment and Economic Conditions
Unemployment rate (most recent)
The most current local unemployment estimates are published monthly by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (LAUS) and distributed through Texas labor market reporting.
- The definitive “most recent year” annual average unemployment rate for Red River County is available through the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) Labor Market Information (county time series) and BLS local area data tables.
(For small counties, month-to-month changes can be volatile; annual averages are commonly used for year-over-year comparison.)
Major industries and employment sectors
In rural Northeast Texas counties, employment commonly concentrates in:
- Public administration and education (school districts, county/city government)
- Health care and social assistance (clinics, nursing and long-term care)
- Retail trade and accommodation/food services (small-town commercial corridors)
- Manufacturing (select niches) and construction
- Agriculture/forestry-related activity (often underrepresented in standard wage-and-salary counts due to self-employment and small operations)
Sector shares for Red River County are available through ACS “Industry by Occupation” and “Industry by Class of Worker” tables on data.census.gov. Employer concentration and covered employment trends can be cross-referenced in TWC regional labor market profiles.
Common occupations and workforce breakdown
Occupational patterns typical of the county’s labor market include:
- Office/administrative support, sales, and service occupations
- Transportation/material moving (regional freight and commuting corridors)
- Construction and extraction and installation/maintenance/repair
- Education, training, and library and health care support/practitioners The most consistent county occupational percentages are published in ACS occupation tables on data.census.gov.
Commuting patterns and mean commute time
- Mean commute time: Reported by the ACS for each county (mean travel time to work for workers age 16+ not working from home). The county figure is available in ACS commuting tables on data.census.gov.
- Commuting patterns: Rural counties commonly show a mix of in-county work (schools, government, local services) and out-of-county commuting to larger employment centers in the broader Northeast Texas region.
Local employment vs out-of-county work
- Residence vs workplace: ACS provides “Place of Work” characteristics (worked in county of residence vs outside) and commuting flows at summary levels.
- Best available proxy: The ACS “County-to-County Commuting” and “Place of Work” tables on data.census.gov provide the most current county estimates of the share working outside the county.
A single definitive, annually-updated county commuting-flow narrative is not published by the county itself; the ACS remains the standard source.
Housing and Real Estate
Homeownership rate and rental share
- Homeownership vs renting: The most recent county homeownership rate and renter share are published in ACS housing tenure tables on data.census.gov. Rural counties in this region typically exhibit higher homeownership rates than large metro counties, with a correspondingly smaller rental market.
Median property values and recent trends
- Median value of owner-occupied housing units: Reported in ACS tables for Red River County.
- Recent trends: County-level appreciation can be inferred by comparing ACS multi-year estimates across periods, but the ACS is not a transaction-price index and can lag market shifts. For a consistent “median value” time series, ACS remains the most comparable public dataset for small counties.
Typical rent prices
- Median gross rent: Reported in ACS tables (includes contract rent plus utilities).
Given the county’s rural profile, rental inventory is typically smaller and more dispersed, and “median rent” can be influenced by limited multi-unit stock; ACS remains the standard reference.
Types of housing (structure mix)
The county housing stock is characteristically:
- Predominantly single-family detached homes and manufactured housing
- Limited apartment supply (small multifamily properties concentrated near town centers)
- Significant presence of rural lots, farm-adjacent residences, and lower-density subdivisions
Structure-type percentages by unit count are reported in ACS “Units in Structure” tables on data.census.gov.
Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools/amenities)
- Town-centered amenities: Clarksville and other small communities tend to concentrate schools, grocery/pharmacy services, clinics, and civic facilities within short driving distances, while outlying areas involve longer trips to schools and services.
- Rural access patterns: Housing outside town limits commonly involves larger parcels, septic systems, and reliance on state highways/FM roads for access to schools and employment.
No single countywide “neighborhood amenity index” is published; characterization is based on the county’s settlement pattern and typical rural service geography.
Property tax overview (rates and typical homeowner cost)
- Taxing entities: Property taxes typically include the county, school districts, and applicable city and special districts (e.g., hospital, utility, or community college where applicable).
- Rates and bills: The most authoritative current rates and levy details are posted by local appraisal and tax offices and summarized in county/district tax rate notices. A consistent public reference point for taxable values and local rates is available via the appraisal district and local taxing units; statewide property tax reporting context is maintained by the Texas Comptroller’s property tax resources.
Because tax rates differ by school district and by whether property lies inside city limits or special districts, a single county “average rate” is not published as an official uniform value; homeowner tax cost is typically best approximated as: (taxable value) × (total local rate), using the property’s specific jurisdictional rates and exemptions (notably the homestead exemption).
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Texas
- Anderson
- Andrews
- Angelina
- Aransas
- Archer
- Armstrong
- Atascosa
- Austin
- Bailey
- Bandera
- Bastrop
- Baylor
- Bee
- Bell
- Bexar
- Blanco
- Borden
- Bosque
- Bowie
- Brazoria
- Brazos
- Brewster
- Briscoe
- Brooks
- Brown
- Burleson
- Burnet
- Caldwell
- Calhoun
- Callahan
- Cameron
- Camp
- Carson
- Cass
- Castro
- Chambers
- Cherokee
- Childress
- Clay
- Cochran
- Coke
- Coleman
- Collin
- Collingsworth
- Colorado
- Comal
- Comanche
- Concho
- Cooke
- Coryell
- Cottle
- Crane
- Crockett
- Crosby
- Culberson
- Dallam
- Dallas
- Dawson
- De Witt
- Deaf Smith
- Delta
- Denton
- Dickens
- Dimmit
- Donley
- Duval
- Eastland
- Ector
- Edwards
- El Paso
- Ellis
- Erath
- Falls
- Fannin
- Fayette
- Fisher
- Floyd
- Foard
- Fort Bend
- Franklin
- Freestone
- Frio
- Gaines
- Galveston
- Garza
- Gillespie
- Glasscock
- Goliad
- Gonzales
- Gray
- Grayson
- Gregg
- Grimes
- Guadalupe
- Hale
- Hall
- Hamilton
- Hansford
- Hardeman
- Hardin
- Harris
- Harrison
- Hartley
- Haskell
- Hays
- Hemphill
- Henderson
- Hidalgo
- Hill
- Hockley
- Hood
- Hopkins
- Houston
- Howard
- Hudspeth
- Hunt
- Hutchinson
- Irion
- Jack
- Jackson
- Jasper
- Jeff Davis
- Jefferson
- Jim Hogg
- Jim Wells
- Johnson
- Jones
- Karnes
- Kaufman
- Kendall
- Kenedy
- Kent
- Kerr
- Kimble
- King
- Kinney
- Kleberg
- Knox
- La Salle
- Lamar
- Lamb
- Lampasas
- Lavaca
- Lee
- Leon
- Liberty
- Limestone
- Lipscomb
- Live Oak
- Llano
- Loving
- Lubbock
- Lynn
- Madison
- Marion
- Martin
- Mason
- Matagorda
- Maverick
- Mcculloch
- Mclennan
- Mcmullen
- Medina
- Menard
- Midland
- Milam
- Mills
- Mitchell
- Montague
- Montgomery
- Moore
- Morris
- Motley
- Nacogdoches
- Navarro
- Newton
- Nolan
- Nueces
- Ochiltree
- Oldham
- Orange
- Palo Pinto
- Panola
- Parker
- Parmer
- Pecos
- Polk
- Potter
- Presidio
- Rains
- Randall
- Reagan
- Real
- Reeves
- Refugio
- Roberts
- Robertson
- Rockwall
- Runnels
- Rusk
- Sabine
- San Augustine
- San Jacinto
- San Patricio
- San Saba
- Schleicher
- Scurry
- Shackelford
- Shelby
- Sherman
- Smith
- Somervell
- Starr
- Stephens
- Sterling
- Stonewall
- Sutton
- Swisher
- Tarrant
- Taylor
- Terrell
- Terry
- Throckmorton
- Titus
- Tom Green
- Travis
- Trinity
- Tyler
- Upshur
- Upton
- Uvalde
- Val Verde
- Van Zandt
- Victoria
- Walker
- Waller
- Ward
- Washington
- Webb
- Wharton
- Wheeler
- Wichita
- Wilbarger
- Willacy
- Williamson
- Wilson
- Winkler
- Wise
- Wood
- Yoakum
- Young
- Zapata
- Zavala