Harrison County is located in northeastern Texas, part of the Ark-La-Tex region, and borders Louisiana along the Sabine River basin. Established in 1839 and named for Jonas Harrison, it developed as an early East Texas settlement area and later became associated with cotton agriculture and, in the 20th century, oil and natural gas production. The county is mid-sized, with a population of roughly 67,000 (2020). Its landscape is characterized by piney woods, wetlands, and lakes typical of the East Texas Piney Woods, with a mix of rural communities and the urban center of Marshall. The local economy reflects government and education employment, energy and related services, health care, and regional trade, alongside smaller-scale agriculture and forestry. Cultural life is influenced by East Texas and bordering Louisiana traditions. The county seat is Marshall.

Harrison County Local Demographic Profile

Harrison County is in East Texas along the Louisiana border, with Marshall as the county seat. The county is part of the Ark-La-Tex region and lies within the Piney Woods area of the state; for local government information, visit the Harrison County official website.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Harrison County, Texas, the county’s population was 66,725 (2020).

Age & Gender

Detailed county age distribution and gender breakdowns are published by the U.S. Census Bureau (American Community Survey) on the county profile. See the “Age and Sex” and related tables in data.census.gov’s Harrison County, Texas profile for the official percentages by age cohort and sex.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

County-level racial and ethnic composition (including race categories and Hispanic/Latino origin) is reported in the U.S. Census Bureau’s county profiles. The official figures are available under “Race and Hispanic Origin” on data.census.gov’s Harrison County, Texas profile and summarized on Census QuickFacts for Harrison County.

Household & Housing Data

Household characteristics (households, average household size, family composition, and related measures) and housing indicators (housing units, occupancy/vacancy, homeownership, and selected housing characteristics) are published by the U.S. Census Bureau. Official county values are provided in the “Housing” and “Families & Living Arrangements” sections of data.census.gov’s Harrison County, Texas profile and in summary form on Census QuickFacts.

Email Usage

Harrison County, in East Texas, combines the small city of Marshall with extensive rural areas; lower population density outside the city tends to increase last‑mile costs and can constrain reliable home internet, affecting routine digital communication such as email.

Direct county-level email usage rates are not routinely published, so email adoption is inferred from proxy indicators of digital access and likely user base. The most commonly used proxies are household broadband subscription and computer availability from the U.S. Census Bureau data portal (American Community Survey), which report how many households have an internet subscription and a computer. These measures track the practical ability to create accounts, authenticate logins, and use webmail.

Age structure also influences adoption: older age cohorts generally show lower rates of broadband and online account use than working-age adults in national surveys, so a county with a larger older share tends to have weaker email uptake on average. County age and sex distributions are available through U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts (Harrison County). Gender balance is typically near even and is not a primary driver compared with access and age.

Connectivity constraints are commonly linked to rural coverage gaps and service availability documented in the FCC National Broadband Map.

Mobile Phone Usage

Harrison County is located in Northeast Texas along the Louisiana border, anchored by the city of Marshall and surrounded by largely rural areas of the Piney Woods region (forested, gently rolling terrain). The county’s lower population density outside Marshall and the presence of extensive tree cover can affect mobile propagation and the economics of dense cell-site deployment, making coverage and performance more variable in outlying communities than in the county seat. Core geographic and population context is available through the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Harrison County.

Key distinction: network availability vs. adoption

  • Network availability refers to where mobile operators report service (coverage footprints for LTE/4G and 5G).
  • Adoption refers to whether households and individuals actually subscribe to mobile service and use mobile devices and mobile internet, including whether mobile is the primary way they access the internet at home.

County-level statistics for “mobile phone ownership” are limited; most authoritative adoption measures are published at the state or national level, or as broadband subscription measures (including mobile) rather than handset ownership.

Mobile access and penetration indicators (adoption)

Household internet subscriptions (including mobile broadband)

County-level adoption is most consistently measured via Census “internet subscription” tables that include categories for cellular data plans (mobile broadband). These data are not equivalent to handset penetration, but they indicate how commonly households rely on mobile broadband for internet access.

  • Primary source (county-level): the U.S. Census Bureau’s data portal (data.census.gov), which provides American Community Survey (ACS) tables for:
    • Household internet subscriptions (including “cellular data plan”).
    • Broadband types (cable, fiber, DSL, satellite, cellular).
  • Interpretation limitation: ACS measures household subscriptions, not the number of devices or individual ownership. A household may have multiple smartphones but no “cellular data plan” subscription reported as a home internet subscription, and many households with smartphones also maintain fixed broadband.

Mobile-only reliance and affordability context

County-level “mobile-only” internet reliance is not always published in a single indicator, but ACS subscription detail can be used to identify households reporting cellular data plans with or without other broadband types. For broader affordability and adoption context, Texas-focused aggregation and mapping resources are often used alongside ACS:

Mobile internet usage patterns and technology (availability)

4G LTE availability

4G LTE service is broadly available across most populated areas of Texas counties, including county seats and along major road corridors, but county-specific coverage extent and quality vary by carrier and location (especially in forested, lower-density areas).

  • Authoritative availability source: the FCC National Broadband Map, which provides location-based availability for mobile broadband by provider and technology.
  • How it is represented: the FCC map distinguishes mobile availability using standardized mobile broadband reporting and allows inspection at specific locations rather than summarizing a single countywide “coverage percentage” in a way that reflects real-world signal quality.

5G availability (sub-6 GHz and mmWave considerations)

The FCC map and carrier-reported coverage layers indicate where 5G is reported as available. In practice:

  • Sub-6 GHz 5G (mid-band/low-band) is the form most likely to appear in smaller cities and along transportation corridors due to wider propagation.
  • mmWave 5G (very high frequency, short range) is typically concentrated in dense urban environments and specific venues; it is less common in rural county geographies.

Because 5G availability is carrier- and location-specific, countywide statements require map-based verification rather than assumptions.

  • Availability source: FCC National Broadband Map (technology and provider by location).
  • Reporting limitation: FCC availability reflects provider-reported coverage and modeled service; it does not directly measure consistent on-the-ground performance.

Performance and congestion considerations (usage experience)

County-level, provider-neutral performance reporting is not published as a single official metric for each county in the same way availability is. Performance varies with:

  • Distance to cell sites, terrain/tree cover, and building penetration.
  • Backhaul capacity (fiber/microwave) to towers.
  • Local congestion patterns around Marshall and at events, schools, and employment centers.

Where referenced, performance should be treated as separate from availability and sourced from measured datasets rather than coverage maps; the FCC broadband map is an availability tool, not a speed test repository.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

County-specific device-type breakdowns (smartphone vs. basic phone vs. hotspot/tablet) are generally not published in a standard official dataset at the county level.

The most reliable local proxy is ACS device and subscription categorization, which addresses how households connect (cellular data plan, fixed broadband types) rather than enumerating smartphones. National surveys (not county-specific) consistently show smartphones as the dominant mobile device category, but that does not yield a Harrison County-specific share without a county-level survey.

  • Household technology/subscription categories: available through data.census.gov (ACS).
  • Limitation: ACS does not directly report “smartphone ownership rate” at the county level as a single standardized indicator; it reports subscription types and household computing devices in selected tables, depending on year and release.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage in Harrison County

Rural–urban structure and population density

  • Marshall as a connectivity hub: County seats typically have denser tower placement and more consistent LTE/5G availability than unincorporated areas.
  • Lower-density areas: Rural parts of Harrison County generally face fewer sites per square mile and more variable indoor coverage.

Population and housing patterns are documented in the Census QuickFacts profile and deeper ACS tables on data.census.gov.

Terrain, land cover, and right-of-way

  • The Piney Woods land cover (forests) can attenuate higher-frequency signals and increase variability in rural coverage.
  • Deployment is also shaped by access to tower sites, power, and backhaul routes; these factors influence both mobile coverage quality and the economics of upgrades.

Income, age, and household composition (adoption-side influences)

Demographic factors most associated with differences in broadband adoption and device dependence include income, age distribution, educational attainment, and disability status. For Harrison County, these are available as ACS estimates and can be viewed through:

Cross-border travel and commuting patterns

Harrison County’s position near Louisiana and along regional highways can concentrate demand along corridors and in town centers (where commuting, retail, and services cluster). This can affect network loading patterns locally without changing the underlying availability footprint.

Local and state planning context relevant to mobile connectivity

While mobile networks are primarily privately deployed, public broadband planning resources can help interpret local availability/adoption patterns and identify infrastructure priorities:

Data limitations and what can be stated definitively

  • Definitive at county level: location-based mobile availability by provider/technology via the FCC National Broadband Map; county demographic and household internet subscription patterns via data.census.gov.
  • Not definitively available as a single countywide official statistic: smartphone penetration rate, basic-phone share, or a comprehensive “mobile-only household” rate presented as a single headline metric for Harrison County (though ACS subscription categories can be analyzed to approximate cellular-plan reliance).
  • Availability is not adoption: reported 4G/5G coverage does not establish that households subscribe, that devices are 5G-capable, or that consistent indoor performance is achieved across rural parts of the county.

Social Media Trends

Harrison County is in East Texas along the Louisiana border, anchored by Marshall (the county seat) and part of the Ark-La-Tex region. The county’s mix of small-city and rural communities, commuting ties to the broader East Texas economy, and local civic/church networks tends to align social media use with statewide and national patterns: high smartphone-based use, heavy reliance on a small set of major platforms, and locally oriented sharing around events, schools, and community organizations.

User statistics (penetration / active use)

  • County-level social media penetration: No major public dataset reports statistically reliable, platform-specific penetration estimates at the county level for Harrison County. County measurement is commonly inferred from broader geographies.
  • Benchmark rates used for contextualization (U.S./Texas patterns):
  • Local implication: Given typical adoption patterns in non-metro East Texas counties, social media usage is generally high among connected adults, with access shaped by broadband availability and smartphone reliance rather than fixed home connections.

Age group trends (highest usage groups)

National survey data consistently shows age as the strongest predictor of platform use:

  • Highest overall social media use: Adults 18–29 and 30–49 (highest “any social media” usage), according to the Pew Research Center.
  • Platform-specific age patterns (U.S. benchmarks):
    • Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok: Skew younger (especially under 30), per Pew’s platform breakdowns in the social media fact sheet.
    • Facebook: More evenly distributed across adult ages and remains comparatively stronger among older adults than youth-heavy platforms (Pew).
    • YouTube: High reach across age groups, including older adults, per Pew.

Gender breakdown

  • Overall: Gender differences are generally smaller than age differences across most platforms, but there are consistent skews:
    • Women are more likely than men to report using Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest.
    • Men are more likely than women to report using YouTube and some discussion/news-oriented platforms.
  • These patterns are documented in Pew’s platform-by-demographic tables within the Pew Research Center social media fact sheet (U.S. benchmarks; county-level gender splits are not published in major public sources).

Most-used platforms (percentages where available)

County-specific platform shares are not published in standard public datasets; the most reliable publicly available percentages are national benchmarks:

Harrison County takeaway (platform mix): In counties like Harrison with strong community networks and broad age dispersion, Facebook and YouTube typically function as the broadest-reach platforms, while Instagram/TikTok/Snapchat concentrate more among younger residents, and LinkedIn is more occupation-dependent.

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns / preferences)

  • Community-information use cases: In smaller and mid-sized communities, social platforms are commonly used for local event discovery, school and sports updates, civic alerts, and marketplace activity, with Facebook-centric sharing and group engagement patterns aligning with Facebook’s role as a general-purpose network (consistent with its broad age reach in Pew data).
  • Short-form video growth: Nationally, short-form video consumption (notably on TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts) is a major engagement driver, with the strongest intensity among younger adults (Pew platform-by-age patterns).
  • Messaging + social overlap: Social usage increasingly blends with direct messaging and group chats; Pew’s reported adoption of WhatsApp and the general dominance of mobile access (Pew mobile fact sheet) support smartphone-first engagement patterns.
  • Engagement concentration: As in most U.S. areas, posting and high-volume commenting tend to be concentrated among a smaller share of users, while a larger share primarily consumes content (a widely observed distribution in social research; Pew’s surveys emphasize usage prevalence rather than posting frequency by county).

Family & Associates Records

Harrison County family-related public records are primarily handled through the county clerk and state vital records systems. The Harrison County Clerk maintains and issues many vital records for events filed in the county, including birth and death records (as part of Texas vital records) and marriage records; older records and some indexes may be available through clerk-held archives. Adoption records in Texas are generally sealed by law and are typically accessible only through authorized legal processes rather than general public inspection.

Public-facing databases are limited at the county level. The county provides online access points for certain records and services through the Harrison County Clerk resources and portals, while statewide indexes and certified vital record ordering are managed by the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS).

Access methods include:

Privacy restrictions commonly apply to recent vital records (limited access periods under Texas law) and to adoption and certain court-related family matters, which are not open public records.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

Marriage-related records

  • Marriage license / marriage application: Issued by the Harrison County Clerk and recorded after the marriage is returned to the clerk.
  • Marriage certificate (county record copy): A certified copy of the recorded marriage license/return maintained by the Harrison County Clerk.
  • Marriage verification (state record): A marriage verification letter may be available through the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), Vital Statistics for eligible years.

Divorce-related records

  • Divorce decree (final judgment): Part of the case file maintained by the Harrison County District Clerk (divorces are handled through district courts in Texas).
  • Divorce record verification (state record): DSHS Vital Statistics maintains divorce indexes/verification for eligible years; this is not a substitute for a certified decree.

Annulments

  • Annulment decree / order: Annulments are court cases; the final order is maintained by the Harrison County District Clerk as part of the civil case record, similar to a divorce file.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

Harrison County Clerk (marriage records)

  • Filed/recorded with: Harrison County Clerk’s office (official public records of marriages recorded in the county).
  • Access methods:
    • In-person requests at the County Clerk for certified and non-certified copies (as permitted).
    • Mail requests are commonly accepted for certified copies.
    • Online access may exist through county-supported or third-party public record portals for indexes and unofficial images; certified copies generally require an order through the clerk.

Harrison County District Clerk (divorce and annulment court records)

  • Filed with: Harrison County District Clerk (court case files, including petitions, orders, and final decrees).
  • Access methods:
    • In-person review of non-confidential portions of case files and purchase of copies through the District Clerk.
    • Online case information may be available through county/district clerk or statewide court search tools for docket-level information; access to documents varies by system and confidentiality rules.
    • Certified copies of decrees are issued by the District Clerk.

Texas DSHS Vital Statistics (state-level verifications)

  • Maintains: Statewide vital records services including marriage and divorce verifications for certain year ranges established by DSHS.
  • Access: Requests are made through DSHS Vital Statistics according to agency rules on eligibility, identification, and fees.
    Reference: Texas DSHS Vital Statistics

Typical information included in these records

Marriage license / recorded marriage return (county record)

Common fields include:

  • Full names of both parties (including maiden name where provided)
  • Date the license was issued and county of issuance
  • Ages or dates of birth (varies by form/era)
  • Residences/addresses at time of application (often included)
  • Place of marriage and date of ceremony
  • Officiant name and title, and officiant’s signature
  • Witness information (varies)
  • Clerk’s file number/book-page or instrument number, and recording date

Divorce decree / annulment order (court record)

Common elements include:

  • Court, cause number, and parties’ names
  • Date of filing and date the decree/order is signed
  • Findings and orders regarding:
    • Dissolution/annulment terms
    • Division of property and debts
    • Child-related orders (conservatorship/custody, visitation, child support) when applicable
    • Spousal maintenance (when applicable)
    • Name change provisions (when requested and granted)
  • Judge’s signature and court seal on certified copies

State verifications (DSHS)

Typically provide limited indexed information, commonly:

  • Names of parties
  • Event type (marriage/divorce)
  • Date and place (county) of event
  • State file/reference identifiers
    Verifications generally do not contain the full terms found in court decrees.

Privacy and legal restrictions

Public record status and confidentiality

  • Marriage records recorded by the County Clerk are generally treated as public records, with access subject to Texas public information laws and redaction requirements for protected personal data.
  • Divorce and annulment case files are generally public court records, but specific documents or data elements may be confidential by law or court order.

Common restrictions and redactions

  • Sealed records: Courts may seal parts of a case file or entire records in limited circumstances; sealed materials are not available to the public.
  • Protected personal information: Courts and clerks may redact information such as Social Security numbers, certain financial account numbers, and sensitive identifying information.
  • Child-related and sensitive matters: Some filings involving minors, custody evaluations, or sensitive medical/mental health information may be restricted, sealed, or accessible only in limited form.
  • Certified copies and identity requirements: Agencies may require identification or proof of entitlement for certain certified or restricted vital records services, especially at the state level through DSHS.

Legal framework (Texas)

  • Maintenance and access are governed by Texas statutes and rules including public information provisions, vital records laws, and Texas court rules regarding confidentiality and sealed records.

Education, Employment and Housing

Harrison County is in Northeast Texas along the Louisiana border, anchored by Marshall (the county seat) and several smaller towns and rural communities. The county’s population is mid-sized for the region and includes a mix of city neighborhoods, small-town residential areas, and agricultural/wooded rural tracts. Community institutions are centered on K–12 school districts, East Texas service and manufacturing employers, and a housing stock dominated by single-family homes.

Education Indicators

Public schools (count and names)

A single countywide count of “public schools” varies by source and year because campuses open/close or change grade configurations. The most consistently accessible campus lists are maintained by each independent school district (ISD) serving the county. Major ISDs with campuses in Harrison County include:

  • Marshall ISD (Marshall)
  • Hallsville ISD (Hallsville)
  • Waskom ISD (Waskom)
  • Elysian Fields ISD (Elysian Fields)
  • Harleton ISD (Harleton)

Campus (school) names and current rosters are maintained on district sites and in state accountability directories; see the Texas Education Agency district and campus profiles via the Texas Academic Performance Reports (TAPR) for official listings.

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratios: Texas public-school student–teacher ratios typically fall in the mid-teens to high-teens (students per teacher), with variation by district size and grade level. District-specific ratios are reported in TAPR and district profiles; use the TAPR district pages for Marshall ISD, Hallsville ISD, Waskom ISD, Elysian Fields ISD, and Harleton ISD for the most recent ratios.
  • Graduation rates: TEA reports four‑year cohort graduation rates by district and student group. Harrison County districts’ rates are available through district TAPR profiles (latest year posted by TEA). Countywide graduation is not published as a single figure by TEA; district rates serve as the primary proxy. Source: Texas Academic Performance Reports.

Adult educational attainment

County adult educational attainment is most commonly cited from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) 5‑year estimates.

  • High school diploma (or equivalent), age 25+: Harrison County is below the U.S. average and typically near or slightly below the Texas average for high-school completion in recent ACS 5‑year releases.
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher, age 25+: Harrison County is below the U.S. and Texas averages for bachelor’s attainment in recent ACS 5‑year releases.

Official county percentages by year are available in the ACS “Educational Attainment” tables via data.census.gov (Geography: Harrison County, Texas; Table S1501).

Notable programs (STEM, CTE, Advanced Placement)

Across Harrison County districts, notable offerings commonly documented in district course catalogs and TEA reports include:

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE): Pathways aligned to regional labor demand (e.g., health science, welding/manufacturing, automotive, business/IT, agriculture). CTE participation and performance indicators are reported in TAPR.
  • Advanced Placement (AP) / dual credit: High schools commonly offer AP coursework and/or dual credit partnerships (often through regional community colleges). TEA reports advanced course/dual-credit indicators in TAPR.
  • STEM programs: STEM course sequences are typically embedded through math/science pathways, robotics/engineering electives, and CTE clusters (district-specific).

Sources: district TAPR profiles (TEA TAPR) and district course catalogs (district websites).

School safety measures and counseling resources

Texas public schools operate under statewide school safety and security requirements, including emergency operations planning, campus threat assessment processes, and required safety trainings, with implementation details varying by district. Counseling resources generally include:

  • School counseling services (academic advising, crisis response, college/career planning), reported in staffing profiles and district student support services pages
  • Mental health and behavioral supports integrated with multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS) and referrals to community providers where applicable

State framework references include the Texas Education Agency school safety resources. District-specific safety plans and counseling staffing are typically documented on district sites and in district-level reports.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year available)

The most recent official unemployment estimates are published monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS). Harrison County’s rate fluctuates with seasonality and broader economic conditions and has generally tracked near state and regional East Texas levels in recent years. The current and historical series are available through:

Because the question requests the most recent year, the best practice is to use the latest annual average from LAUS for Harrison County.

Major industries and employment sectors

Based on common East Texas county sector composition and ACS “Industry” distributions, major sectors typically include:

  • Educational services (public school districts are major employers)
  • Health care and social assistance
  • Retail trade
  • Manufacturing (including light manufacturing and wood-related/industrial production in the broader region)
  • Public administration
  • Construction and transportation/warehousing (regionally important along major corridors)

Sector shares and counts are available from ACS on data.census.gov (Industry tables) and can be cross-referenced with state labor-market summaries.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

Occupational patterns in Harrison County generally reflect a service-and-trades mix common to mid-sized East Texas counties:

  • Office and administrative support
  • Sales and related
  • Production
  • Transportation and material moving
  • Healthcare support and practitioner roles
  • Education and training occupations
  • Construction and extraction

Official occupation distributions for employed residents are available via ACS occupation tables on data.census.gov.

Commuting patterns and mean commute times

Commuting in Harrison County includes intra-county travel to Marshall and nearby towns, plus out-commuting to larger job centers in the region. Typical characteristics:

  • Primary mode: Driving alone is the dominant commute mode (consistent with Texas and non-metro commuting patterns).
  • Mean commute time: County mean commute time is generally in the mid‑20‑minute range in recent ACS releases (a common level for mixed rural/small-city counties).

Official commute time and mode shares are available via ACS “Commuting (Journey to Work)” tables on data.census.gov (Table S0801/S0802).

Local employment versus out-of-county work

Out-of-county commuting is significant in many Northeast Texas counties due to regional labor markets. The most direct public indicator is ACS “place of work” and “county-to-county commuting” style measures (where available) and workforce residency vs. jobs counts from labor-market datasets. ACS commuting tables on data.census.gov provide the clearest standardized proxy for the share of workers commuting outside the county.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership rate and rental share

Harrison County’s housing tenure is typically owner-majority, reflecting a single-family housing stock and rural land availability.

  • Homeownership and renter shares are reported in ACS tenure tables (DP04/S2501) via data.census.gov.

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median owner-occupied home value: Harrison County median values are generally below the Texas median in recent ACS 5‑year estimates, consistent with East Texas pricing.
  • Trend: Over the last several years, values have generally increased, following statewide appreciation patterns, with slower growth than major Texas metros.

Official median value estimates are available from ACS (DP04) at data.census.gov. For market-trend context, MLS-based sources provide more current but less standardized measures; ACS remains the most comparable countywide benchmark.

Typical rent prices

  • Median gross rent: Harrison County median gross rent is generally below the Texas median in ACS 5‑year estimates, reflecting lower housing costs than major metro areas.

Median gross rent is available in ACS DP04 on data.census.gov.

Types of housing

Harrison County housing is characterized by:

  • Single-family detached homes as the dominant structure type (especially outside central Marshall)
  • Manufactured housing present in rural areas and smaller communities
  • Apartments and small multifamily properties concentrated in and around Marshall and near major roads/commercial areas
  • Rural lots and acreage tracts supporting dispersed residential development

Structure type distributions are reported in ACS (DP04) on data.census.gov.

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools or amenities)

  • Marshall-area neighborhoods tend to provide closer access to consolidated amenities (hospital/clinics, retail, public services) and multiple school campuses.
  • Small-town and rural areas provide larger lots and lower density, with longer travel times to shopping and specialty services and a heavier dependence on personal vehicles.
  • School proximity tends to be strongest in Marshall and the smaller incorporated communities where campuses are centrally located relative to housing.

This characterization reflects typical built-environment patterns; detailed proximity metrics are not published as a single county statistic and are commonly assessed using GIS or local planning documents.

Property tax overview (average rate and typical homeowner cost)

Texas property taxes are levied by overlapping local jurisdictions (county, school districts, cities, special districts). Key points for Harrison County:

  • Rate levels: Effective property tax rates in Texas commonly fall around ~1.5%–2.5% of market value, varying widely by school district and location. Harrison County properties typically fall within that broad Texas range.
  • Typical homeowner tax cost: A practical proxy is median annual property taxes reported by ACS for owner-occupied homes (DP04), which captures actual taxes paid across households.

For appraisal and local tax information, see the Harrison County Appraisal District and Texas property tax administration overview from the Texas Comptroller’s property tax resources. Countywide median taxes and tenure/value context are available from ACS at data.census.gov.

Data note (availability and recency): For county-level education attainment, commute metrics, home values, rents, and property taxes, the most recent standardized “all-in-one” source is the ACS 5‑year release on data.census.gov. For K–12 district indicators (graduation rates, staffing ratios, program participation), the most recent official district-level source is TEA TAPR. For unemployment, the most recent official series is BLS LAUS.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Texas