Matagorda County Local Demographic Profile
Matagorda County, Texas — key demographics
Population size
- 36,255 (2020 Census)
- 2023 estimate: ~36,100 (U.S. Census estimate)
Age
- Median age: ~37–38 years
- Under 18: ~25%
- 65 and over: ~17%
Gender
- Female: ~48.5–49%
- Male: ~51–51.5%
Racial/ethnic composition
- Hispanic or Latino (any race): ~49–50%
- White alone, not Hispanic: ~34%
- Black or African American alone: ~12%
- Asian alone: ~2%
- American Indian and Alaska Native alone: ~1%
- Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone: ~0.1%
- Two or more races: ~3–4%
- White alone (including Hispanic): ~67–68%
Households
- Households: ~13,000 (ACS 5-year)
- Average household size: ~2.7–2.8 persons
- Family households: ~70% of households
- Households with children under 18: ~34–35%
- Owner-occupied housing unit rate: ~74–75%
Insights
- Roughly half of residents are Hispanic/Latino; about one-third are non-Hispanic White.
- Age profile is balanced, with a modest senior share (~17%) and a median age in the upper 30s.
- Household size is slightly above the U.S. average, and homeownership is relatively high.
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau (2020 Decennial Census; 2019–2023 American Community Survey 5-year estimates; Census QuickFacts for Matagorda County, TX)
Email Usage in Matagorda County
Matagorda County, TX shows widespread email adoption. Estimated email users: 27,000 residents (≈92% of adults), derived from ACS demographics and Pew email-adoption rates. Age mix of users (approximate counts): 18–29 ≈22% (6,000); 30–49 ≈33% (9,000); 50–64 ≈27% (7,000); 65+ ≈18% (~5,000). Gender split is essentially even among users, mirroring the county’s population (≈50% female, 50% male).
Digital access trends:
- About 80% of households subscribe to home broadband; roughly 15% have no home internet and rely on mobile data or public access.
- Email is frequently accessed via smartphones in rural tracts; subscription and fiber availability are higher in and around Bay City and Palacios than in outlying areas.
Local density/connectivity context:
- Land area ~1,114 sq mi; population density ≈32 residents per sq mi, indicating a largely rural county where last‑mile fixed broadband is costlier, reinforcing mobile and shared-access email use.
Notes: Estimates combine U.S. Census Bureau ACS age structure for Matagorda County with national email-usage rates by age from Pew Research to produce county-level counts and shares.
Mobile Phone Usage in Matagorda County
Mobile phone usage in Matagorda County, TX — 2025 snapshot
Baseline population (U.S. Census 2020)
- Total population: 36,255
- Character: Gulf Coast, largely rural/micropolitan (Bay City, Palacios), with sizable industrial/energy, agriculture, and fishing employment
User estimates (derived from Census age structure for similar rural Texas counties; Pew Research smartphone adoption 2023; CDC/NCHS wireless-only household trends)
- Adults (18+): approximately 27,500–28,000
- Smartphone users: 22,000–24,000 adults (county adoption estimated at 80–86%, slightly below Texas’ big-metro rates)
- “Smartphone-only” internet users (no home broadband, rely on mobile for internet): roughly 5,000–6,000 adults (about 18–22% of adults; higher than the Texas urban average)
- Adults living in wireless-only households (no landline): on the order of 70–74% of adults, modestly below Texas’ high statewide rate but above historical U.S. rural averages
Demographic breakdown and usage patterns
- Ethnicity/race (ACS pattern for the county): roughly half Hispanic/Latino, about one-third non-Hispanic White, ~1 in 8 Black, small but notable Asian (Vietnamese) community centered around Palacios
- Age: older than the Texas median, with a larger share of 50+ residents than major metros
- Implications for mobile:
- Device mix skews more Android and prepaid than the Texas metro average, influenced by income and age structure
- Higher dependence on messaging/social apps with strong bilingual use (WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger), and on mobile hotspots for homework and job tasks where home broadband is absent or slow
- Slightly slower turnover to 5G-capable handsets versus urban Texas
Digital infrastructure highlights
- Carrier presence: AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon provide countywide LTE with 5G primarily on low-band layers; mid-band 5G (capacity layers) is most reliable in Bay City, along TX-35 and TX-60 corridors, and around Palacios
- Coverage texture:
- Stronger service in population centers, along major highways, and near industrial sites
- Noticeable weak spots across marshlands, barrier-island/coastline areas, and wildlife/refuge zones east/southeast of Bay City where tower siting is constrained
- Resiliency: Coastal hurricane exposure has driven carrier hardening and the use of portable cell assets for recovery; short-term outages still occur during severe Gulf weather
- Enterprise/industrial: Energy, port, and agricultural operations use rugged devices, push-to-talk over LTE, and increasingly CBRS/private-LTE for on-site coverage; this is more prominent than in typical Texas inland counties
How Matagorda differs from Texas overall
- Adoption level: High smartphone use, but a few points below large Texas metros due to older age distribution and lower median income
- Internet dependence: Greater share of residents rely on phones as their primary internet connection than the state average, reflecting lower fixed-broadband availability and affordability in rural/coastal tracts
- Network experience: 5G availability exists, but mid-band 5G capacity is patchier and more corridor-centric than in major metros; fringe/coastal zones see more LTE fallback and variable signal quality
- Plan mix: Higher prepaid penetration and budget plans compared with the Texas urban profile; slower upgrade cycles to the newest 5G devices
- Language and apps: More bilingual communication and heavier reliance on WhatsApp/Facebook for community coordination than the state’s average urban counties
Bottom line
- Expect roughly 22–24 thousand adult smartphone users in Matagorda County today, with a materially higher-than-metro share depending on mobile as their primary internet. Service is solid in towns and along TX-35/TX-60, but coastal and marsh areas still create coverage gaps. Compared with Texas statewide, Matagorda shows slightly lower 5G device penetration, more prepaid usage, and more mobile-only internet reliance, driven by its rural/coastal geography, industry mix, and demographics.
Social Media Trends in Matagorda County
Matagorda County, TX social media snapshot (2025)
Scope and baseline
- Population: ~36,300; residents aged 13+: ~30,900
- Monthly social media penetration (any platform, 13+): ≈81% (≈25,000 users)
Most‑used platforms among residents 13+ (monthly; est.)
- YouTube: 78% (~24.1k)
- Facebook: 64% (~19.8k)
- Instagram: 38% (~11.7k)
- TikTok: 32% (~9.9k)
- Pinterest: 30% (~9.3k)
- WhatsApp: 25% (~7.7k)
- Snapchat: 24% (~7.4k)
- X (Twitter): 18% (~5.6k)
- Nextdoor: 9% (~2.8k)
Age profile of local social media users (share of users)
- 13–17: 9% (heavy on TikTok, Snapchat; Instagram strong)
- 18–29: 21% (TikTok, Instagram, YouTube; Snapchat active)
- 30–49: 35% (Facebook and YouTube dominant; Instagram/Reels growing)
- 50–64: 22% (Facebook, YouTube; some Pinterest and WhatsApp)
- 65+: 13% (Facebook first, YouTube second; limited TikTok/Instagram)
Gender breakdown (share of users by platform; est.)
- Overall social media users: Women 51%, Men 49%
- Facebook: Women 56%, Men 44%
- Instagram: Women 54%, Men 46%
- TikTok: Women 58%, Men 42%
- YouTube: Men 56%, Women 44%
- Snapchat: Women 64%, Men 36%
- Pinterest: Women 75%, Men 25%
- X (Twitter): Men 62%, Women 38%
- WhatsApp: ~50% Women, 50% Men
Behavioral trends
- Community-first usage: Facebook Groups and Pages are central for local news, school sports, church activities, buy/sell/Marketplace, fishing/boating reports, and severe weather/emergency updates. Engagement spikes around storms, beach conditions, plant/industrial updates, and school calendars.
- Video preference: High YouTube watch time (how‑to, local events, outdoor/recreation, church streams). Short‑form video (Reels/TikTok) drives discovery; cross‑posting from Instagram to Facebook improves reach.
- Mobile‑led habits: >90% of local usage is mobile; Stories/Reels/shorts and vertical video outperform static posts.
- Messaging layers: Facebook Messenger is near‑universal alongside Facebook; WhatsApp usage is notable in bilingual/Spanish‑speaking households for family, work crews, and group coordination.
- Shopping and local commerce: Heavy reliance on Facebook Marketplace and local buy/sell groups; service providers (contractors, fishing charters, lawn/handyman, beauty) convert via DMs and comments more than website forms.
- Timing: Peak activity occurs early morning (7–9 a.m.), lunch (12–1 p.m.), and evenings (7–10 p.m.); weekends show stronger comment threads and shares.
- Seasonality: Summer tourism and coastal recreation increase search and social chatter around rentals, RV parks, beach access, fishing conditions, and events; hurricane season drives sharp surges in information‑seeking and official‑page follows.
- Content that travels: Weather alerts, local hero stories, school achievements, fishing/hunting results, beach and wildlife photos, and safety/road updates consistently outperform generic promotions.
Notes on figures
- Numbers are rounded, county‑level estimates for 2025 derived by applying current U.S./Texas rural adoption rates and platform user mix to the local 13+ population; platform percentages reflect monthly usage.
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Texas
- Anderson
- Andrews
- Angelina
- Aransas
- Archer
- Armstrong
- Atascosa
- Austin
- Bailey
- Bandera
- Bastrop
- Baylor
- Bee
- Bell
- Bexar
- Blanco
- Borden
- Bosque
- Bowie
- Brazoria
- Brazos
- Brewster
- Briscoe
- Brooks
- Brown
- Burleson
- Burnet
- Caldwell
- Calhoun
- Callahan
- Cameron
- Camp
- Carson
- Cass
- Castro
- Chambers
- Cherokee
- Childress
- Clay
- Cochran
- Coke
- Coleman
- Collin
- Collingsworth
- Colorado
- Comal
- Comanche
- Concho
- Cooke
- Coryell
- Cottle
- Crane
- Crockett
- Crosby
- Culberson
- Dallam
- Dallas
- Dawson
- De Witt
- Deaf Smith
- Delta
- Denton
- Dickens
- Dimmit
- Donley
- Duval
- Eastland
- Ector
- Edwards
- El Paso
- Ellis
- Erath
- Falls
- Fannin
- Fayette
- Fisher
- Floyd
- Foard
- Fort Bend
- Franklin
- Freestone
- Frio
- Gaines
- Galveston
- Garza
- Gillespie
- Glasscock
- Goliad
- Gonzales
- Gray
- Grayson
- Gregg
- Grimes
- Guadalupe
- Hale
- Hall
- Hamilton
- Hansford
- Hardeman
- Hardin
- Harris
- Harrison
- Hartley
- Haskell
- Hays
- Hemphill
- Henderson
- Hidalgo
- Hill
- Hockley
- Hood
- Hopkins
- Houston
- Howard
- Hudspeth
- Hunt
- Hutchinson
- Irion
- Jack
- Jackson
- Jasper
- Jeff Davis
- Jefferson
- Jim Hogg
- Jim Wells
- Johnson
- Jones
- Karnes
- Kaufman
- Kendall
- Kenedy
- Kent
- Kerr
- Kimble
- King
- Kinney
- Kleberg
- Knox
- La Salle
- Lamar
- Lamb
- Lampasas
- Lavaca
- Lee
- Leon
- Liberty
- Limestone
- Lipscomb
- Live Oak
- Llano
- Loving
- Lubbock
- Lynn
- Madison
- Marion
- Martin
- Mason
- Maverick
- Mcculloch
- Mclennan
- Mcmullen
- Medina
- Menard
- Midland
- Milam
- Mills
- Mitchell
- Montague
- Montgomery
- Moore
- Morris
- Motley
- Nacogdoches
- Navarro
- Newton
- Nolan
- Nueces
- Ochiltree
- Oldham
- Orange
- Palo Pinto
- Panola
- Parker
- Parmer
- Pecos
- Polk
- Potter
- Presidio
- Rains
- Randall
- Reagan
- Real
- Red River
- Reeves
- Refugio
- Roberts
- Robertson
- Rockwall
- Runnels
- Rusk
- Sabine
- San Augustine
- San Jacinto
- San Patricio
- San Saba
- Schleicher
- Scurry
- Shackelford
- Shelby
- Sherman
- Smith
- Somervell
- Starr
- Stephens
- Sterling
- Stonewall
- Sutton
- Swisher
- Tarrant
- Taylor
- Terrell
- Terry
- Throckmorton
- Titus
- Tom Green
- Travis
- Trinity
- Tyler
- Upshur
- Upton
- Uvalde
- Val Verde
- Van Zandt
- Victoria
- Walker
- Waller
- Ward
- Washington
- Webb
- Wharton
- Wheeler
- Wichita
- Wilbarger
- Willacy
- Williamson
- Wilson
- Winkler
- Wise
- Wood
- Yoakum
- Young
- Zapata
- Zavala