Comanche County is located in north-central Texas on the western edge of the Cross Timbers region, roughly between the Dallas–Fort Worth area and the Hill Country. Established in 1856 and named for the Comanche people, it developed as a frontier ranching and farming area and later benefited from regional transportation links and nearby oil and gas activity. The county is small in population, with roughly 14,000 residents in recent estimates. It is predominantly rural, anchored by the city of Comanche and smaller communities such as De Leon and Gustine. Land use reflects mixed agriculture, including cattle operations, hay, and row crops, alongside light manufacturing and local services. The landscape consists of rolling prairie, wooded creek valleys, and reservoirs, including parts of Proctor Lake. Cultural life is shaped by Central Texas small-town institutions and longstanding agricultural traditions. The county seat is Comanche.

Comanche County Local Demographic Profile

Comanche County is located in west-central Texas, within the Cross Timbers region between the Dallas–Fort Worth area and the Hill Country. The county seat is Comanche, and the county is part of the broader Central Texas planning and service area.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Comanche County, Texas, Comanche County had an estimated population of 13,038 (2023). The county’s 2020 Census population was 13,305 (QuickFacts).

Age & Gender

The U.S. Census Bureau data portal (data.census.gov) provides county-level age and sex detail through ACS 5-year tables (commonly including S0101: Age and Sex). A single consolidated age-distribution breakdown and a countywide male/female ratio are not consistently displayed in the QuickFacts summary for all counties and should be taken directly from the relevant ACS table for the selected 5-year period in data.census.gov.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

According to U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts (2020 Census / ACS, as shown on QuickFacts), Comanche County’s racial and ethnic composition is summarized as:

  • White alone: 93.0%
  • Black or African American alone: 0.8%
  • American Indian and Alaska Native alone: 0.7%
  • Asian alone: 0.7%
  • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone: 0.0%
  • Two or more races: 4.8%
  • Hispanic or Latino (of any race): 13.5%

Household & Housing Data

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, key household and housing indicators for Comanche County include:

  • Households: 5,355 (2018–2022)
  • Persons per household: 2.37 (2018–2022)
  • Owner-occupied housing unit rate: 77.1% (2018–2022)
  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units: $133,800 (2018–2022)
  • Median selected monthly owner costs (with a mortgage): $1,254 (2018–2022)
  • Median selected monthly owner costs (without a mortgage): $476 (2018–2022)
  • Median gross rent: $759 (2018–2022)

For local government and planning resources, visit the Comanche County official website.

Email Usage

Comanche County, Texas is a largely rural county with a small population base, where longer distances between homes and service nodes can constrain wired buildouts and make digital communication more dependent on available broadband and mobile coverage.

Direct county-level email-usage rates are not routinely published; email adoption is typically inferred from household internet and device access. County proxies for digital readiness are available from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (data.census.gov), including household broadband subscription and computer ownership. These indicators track the practical ability to use web-based email and authentication services.

Age composition also affects likely email uptake: older populations tend to have lower overall adoption of some online services, while maintaining email for healthcare, government, and family communication. Age distribution for Comanche County is available through ACS age tables. Gender distribution is generally less predictive of email access than age and connectivity, but can be referenced via ACS sex-by-age profiles.

Connectivity limitations are commonly shaped by last-mile availability and provider coverage in rural areas; county-level broadband availability can be reviewed via the FCC National Broadband Map.

Mobile Phone Usage

Comanche County is in Central Texas, west-southwest of the Dallas–Fort Worth metro area, with a predominantly rural settlement pattern anchored by the City of Comanche and smaller communities. The county’s low population density, large service area per cell site, and mixed terrain (rolling hills, river/creek bottoms, and agricultural land typical of the Cross Timbers/Edwards Plateau transition zone) are structural factors that commonly shape mobile network coverage quality, especially away from highways and towns.

Key data limitations and source boundaries (county-level)

County-specific, device-type-specific mobile usage (smartphone vs. feature phone vs. tablet) and generation-specific usage (4G vs. 5G share of traffic) are not consistently published at the county level in public datasets. The most reliable public, county-level indicators generally come from:

  • Household connectivity/adoption surveys (not carrier network performance)
  • Broadband availability maps (coverage claims, not subscriptions)
  • Modeled broadband fabric and availability used by federal/state broadband programs

Where county-level measures are unavailable, the overview relies on county-appropriate public sources and clearly separates network availability from adoption.

County context affecting mobile connectivity

  • Rural land use and distance from towers: Rural counties typically require greater tower spacing, which reduces signal strength and throughput farther from sites and can increase the likelihood of coverage gaps in sparsely populated areas.
  • Transportation corridors vs. off-road areas: Mobile coverage is commonly strongest along state highways and within/near incorporated places, with weaker service in ranchland and remote areas.
  • Topography and vegetation: Rolling terrain and tree cover can attenuate signal, affecting indoor coverage and creating localized “shadowing,” especially for higher-frequency 5G layers.

Network availability (coverage) vs. adoption (use)

Network availability describes where service is advertised as available (by technology and provider), while adoption describes whether households actually subscribe/use mobile or fixed internet services. These differ materially in rural counties where coverage may exist but affordability, device suitability, indoor signal quality, and data caps influence practical use.

Network availability in Comanche County (4G/5G)

Availability mapping sources (public)

  • The most widely used public reference for carrier-reported mobile broadband coverage is the FCC’s Broadband Data Collection (BDC) map, which includes mobile availability layers. See the FCC’s mapping platform via the descriptive FCC resource pages and map entry points at FCC National Broadband Map.
  • Texas broadband planning and federally funded deployment efforts often reference BDC-based availability and the Broadband Serviceable Location Fabric; context and links are available through the Texas Broadband Development Office.

4G LTE

  • General pattern in rural Central Texas: 4G LTE is typically the baseline wide-area mobile broadband layer and is generally more geographically extensive than 5G. In Comanche County, LTE availability is expected to be most continuous near population centers and major roads, with reduced signal quality or gaps in low-density areas.
  • Public verification: The FCC map provides the most direct, county-specific visualization for LTE availability by provider and location, but it reflects carrier-reported coverage and should be treated as “availability claims” rather than guaranteed on-the-ground performance. Reference: FCC National Broadband Map.

5G (availability, not performance)

  • General pattern: In rural counties, 5G often appears first as broader “low-band” 5G coverage (larger footprints, more modest speed gains), with “mid-band” and “high-band/mmWave” concentrated in denser urban areas. County-level public reporting rarely distinguishes these layers in a way that supports definitive statements about speed or typical user experience.
  • Public verification: The FCC map provides location-specific views of mobile broadband availability, including 5G where reported. Reference: FCC National Broadband Map.

Performance vs. availability

  • The FCC availability data does not directly measure realized speeds, indoor signal strength, congestion, or reliability. County-level performance benchmarking is often derived from third-party crowdsourced tests, but those datasets are not uniform and may be sparse in low-density areas, limiting representativeness.

Adoption and access indicators (household use)

Household internet subscription (fixed vs. mobile)

  • The most standard public measure of household internet adoption comes from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS), which includes tables on types of internet subscriptions (e.g., cellular data plan, broadband such as cable/fiber/DSL, satellite). County-level ACS estimates can be retrieved through Census.gov data tools.
  • Interpretation: ACS “cellular data plan” indicates that a household reports a mobile data plan as an internet subscription type, but it does not specify whether mobile is primary, the generation (4G/5G), data cap size, or typical usage volume.

Mobile-only reliance (mobile as primary home internet)

  • County-level measurement of “mobile-only” internet reliance is limited in standard federal tables; ACS can show whether a household has a cellular data plan and whether it has other subscription types, enabling analysis of households that report cellular without other broadband categories. This is an adoption indicator (reported subscription), not a guarantee of adequate service for all applications.

Smartphone access and device ownership

  • Public, county-level “smartphone ownership” estimates are not consistently published in ACS in a way that cleanly isolates smartphone vs. non-smartphone mobile phone ownership for every county. Many device ownership statistics (smartphone share, feature phone share) are available at national or multi-state market levels, but not reliably at the county level for public reference use.
  • As a result, definitive county-specific smartphone-vs-feature-phone shares are typically unavailable from authoritative public sources.

Mobile internet usage patterns (what is known vs. not published at county level)

4G vs. 5G usage

  • Network availability: 4G LTE and some level of 5G availability can be assessed through the FCC map (availability).
  • Actual usage share: County-level breakdowns of how much traffic or how many users are on 4G vs. 5G are not generally published in authoritative public datasets. Carrier and analytics reports tend to be state, regional, or market-level rather than county-level, and methodologies are not uniform.

Typical rural usage considerations (documented generally, not county-specific)

  • Mobile broadband in rural counties is commonly used for on-the-go connectivity, and in some households may serve as a substitute or supplement to fixed broadband where fixed options are limited. Quantifying the share of households using mobile as their primary connection requires ACS table analysis and still does not indicate service quality.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

  • Smartphones: Nationally, smartphones are the dominant mobile device for internet access. However, Comanche County-specific smartphone penetration is not consistently available in public datasets with defensible precision.
  • Other connected devices: Tablets, hotspots, and fixed wireless receivers may be used, but county-level device-type prevalence is typically not available from public, authoritative sources.
  • Actionable county-level proxy: ACS internet subscription categories (cellular plan present vs. other broadband types) provide an adoption proxy for mobile internet reliance, without identifying device type.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage in Comanche County

Rural settlement pattern and distance

  • Lower density increases per-user infrastructure cost and can reduce the economic incentive for dense small-cell deployments, which affects high-capacity 5G layers most strongly. This influences network availability and performance, not just adoption.

Age structure and income

  • Household adoption of mobile-only plans vs. fixed broadband is commonly associated (in ACS-style analyses) with income, housing stability, and age, but specific relationships must be derived from county-level ACS tabulations rather than assumed. County demographics can be sourced from Census.gov for population, age distribution, household income, and housing characteristics.

Landforms and coverage variability

  • Rolling topography and vegetation can reduce line-of-sight and indoor penetration, producing variable user experience across short distances—an effect more pronounced on higher-frequency bands.

Practical distinction summary (Comanche County)

  • Network availability (coverage): Best assessed using the FCC’s location-level availability layers for LTE/5G; this is carrier-reported and does not guarantee consistent performance. Source: FCC National Broadband Map.
  • Household adoption (subscriptions/use): Best assessed using ACS household subscription tables via Census.gov, which can indicate the presence of cellular data plans and other broadband types but does not provide 4G/5G usage shares or precise device-type ownership at the county level.
  • State planning context: Texas broadband planning resources and mapping context are available through the Texas Broadband Development Office, which is relevant for understanding how availability data is used for deployment programs, distinct from household adoption.

External references (primary public portals)

Social Media Trends

Comanche County is a rural county in Central Texas, with Comanche as the county seat and a local economy shaped by agriculture, ranching, and small-town services. Its relatively low population density and older age profile compared with large Texas metros tends to align social media use more closely with national rural patterns (greater reliance on Facebook, comparatively lower use of some youth‑skewing platforms), alongside practical uses such as community news, local commerce, and event coordination.

User statistics (penetration/active use)

  • Local (county-specific) penetration: No reputable, regularly updated public dataset reports social media penetration specifically for Comanche County, Texas. County-level social platform “active user” counts are typically proprietary (platform ad tools) and are not considered stable for public statistical reporting.
  • Best-available benchmarks (U.S. adults):
    • 69% of U.S. adults report using at least one social media site, according to the Pew Research Center summary of U.S. social media use (2023).
    • Social media use varies by community type; Pew reports differences by urban/suburban/rural classification in its detailed tables for that same report (rural adults generally report lower use than urban adults).

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

Based on national survey results reported by Pew:

  • Highest use: Adults ages 18–29 report the highest overall social media adoption across platforms (consistently above older age groups in Pew’s platform-by-platform reporting). Source: Pew Research Center, “Social Media Use in 2023”.
  • Middle use: Ages 30–49 generally show high adoption but lower than 18–29, with stronger representation on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn than older groups.
  • Lower use: Ages 50–64 and 65+ show lower overall adoption, with usage concentrated more heavily on Facebook (and to a lesser extent YouTube).
  • Local implication for Comanche County: Counties with comparatively older populations often exhibit a higher share of social activity on Facebook/community groups and a lower share on platforms that skew younger (e.g., Snapchat).

Gender breakdown

  • No county-specific gender split is publicly standardized for Comanche County social media activity.
  • National pattern (platform-dependent): Pew reports that gender differences vary by platform (for example, women more likely than men to use some platforms such as Pinterest; men sometimes higher on others). Source: Pew Research Center platform-by-platform demographic tables.
  • Practical interpretation locally: In rural counties, “community information” usage (local announcements, schools, churches, buy/sell groups) often correlates with higher Facebook participation among adult women, while usage gaps elsewhere are typically smaller and platform-specific rather than universal.

Most-used platforms (percent using each platform)

The following are U.S. adult usage rates (not county-specific) from Pew’s 2023 social media survey:

Local expectation for Comanche County (rural Central Texas context):

  • Facebook and YouTube typically function as the broadest-reach platforms across age groups.
  • Instagram and TikTok skew younger, with concentration among teens and young adults; adult reach is meaningful but narrower than Facebook/YouTube.
  • LinkedIn usage tends to track with professional/college-educated job structures and is often less central in rural counties than in major metros.

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)

  • Community-group orientation: Rural counties commonly show higher reliance on Facebook Groups for community updates (schools, local events, volunteer fire departments, church activities, neighborhood watch, lost/found pets) and informal commerce (local buy/sell/trade).
  • Video-first consumption: With YouTube at the highest national penetration, short how-to, news clips, sports highlights, and local-interest video typically represent a major share of passive consumption. Source: Pew platform usage estimates.
  • Age-driven platform split:
    • Older adults: Heavier concentration on Facebook for social connection and local information; comparatively lower uptake of Snapchat/TikTok.
    • Younger users: More time on TikTok/Instagram/Snapchat, with faster-paced content discovery and messaging.
  • Engagement style: Rural users frequently engage through comments and shares on community posts and local news items, rather than high-volume original posting, aligning with national findings that many users consume and interact without posting frequently (a pattern often described in platform research as “lurking” or low original-content production relative to consumption).

Family & Associates Records

Comanche County family-related public records include vital records and court records. Texas vital records are managed at the state level: births and deaths are registered with the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) Vital Statistics Section, while the county typically holds local copies or indexes. Certified birth and death certificates are obtained through DSHS or authorized partners via Texas.gov and VitalChek (Texas DSHS Vital Statistics; Texas.gov: Vital Records). Adoption records are generally handled through Texas courts and vital records; adoption files and original birth records are restricted and not publicly released except under limited, law-governed circumstances.

Marriage licenses are issued and recorded by the County Clerk, and divorce and other family-law case filings are maintained by the District Clerk (or County Clerk where applicable). The Comanche County Clerk and Comanche County District Clerk provide in-person access to recorded instruments and case records during business hours at their offices in the county courthouse (Comanche County Clerk; Comanche County District Clerk).

Public online databases vary by record type and date. Many official records require on-site search or paid third-party portals linked from county pages. Privacy restrictions commonly apply to birth records, many death records for a statutory period, adoption records, and sensitive information in court filings.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

Marriage records

  • Marriage license and marriage application: Created and maintained by the Comanche County Clerk as part of the county’s official records. After the ceremony, the officiant returns the completed license for recording.
  • Marriage certificate (state record): A statewide record of marriage maintained by the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), Vital Statistics Section. DSHS can issue certified copies for marriages recorded in Texas.
  • Informal (common-law) marriage declaration: Texas allows a Declaration of Informal Marriage, typically filed with a county clerk and recorded as an official public record.

Divorce and annulment records

  • Divorce decree (final judgment): Part of the court case file, maintained by the district clerk in the county where the divorce was filed (for Comanche County filings, the Comanche County District Clerk). A “divorce verification” can also be obtained from Texas DSHS for qualifying years, separate from the full decree.
  • Annulment orders: Annulments are court proceedings; final orders and associated case documents are maintained by the district clerk as part of the civil case file.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

Local county offices (Comanche County)

  • Comanche County Clerk

    • Maintains marriage licenses and related recorded instruments (including returned licenses and recorded declarations of informal marriage).
    • Access is commonly provided through:
      • In-person records search at the clerk’s office
      • Copy requests (plain or certified copies, depending on eligibility and the record type)
      • Some counties also provide online index searching; availability varies by county system.

  • Comanche County District Clerk

    • Maintains divorce and annulment case files (petitions, orders, final decree/judgment, and related filings).
    • Access is commonly provided through:
      • In-person case file review (subject to confidentiality rules and redactions)
      • Copy requests (plain or certified copies of final decrees or other filings, when permissible)

State-level access (Texas)

  • Texas DSHS Vital Statistics Section
    • Maintains statewide vital records and issues:
      • Certified copies of some marriage records
      • Divorce verification letters for certain years (verification is not the same as a full decree)

References:

Typical information included in these records

Marriage license / marriage record

Common fields include:

  • Full legal names of both parties
  • Date the license was issued and county of issuance
  • Marriage date and location (as recorded on the returned license)
  • Name/title of officiant and date officiant signed/returned the license
  • Ages and/or dates of birth (varies by form and era)
  • Places of residence and/or birth (varies)
  • License number and recording details

Divorce decree (final)

Common fields include:

  • Court and cause/case number
  • Names of the parties
  • Date of divorce (date signed/entered)
  • Findings and orders on:
    • Dissolution of the marriage
    • Property division
    • Debt allocation
    • Name change (when ordered)
    • Child-related orders (when applicable), such as conservatorship, possession/access, and child support
    • Spousal maintenance (when applicable)

Annulment order

Common fields include:

  • Court and case number
  • Names of the parties
  • Legal basis for annulment (as found by the court)
  • Date of the order and terms addressing property, children, and related relief (as applicable)

Privacy or legal restrictions

  • Marriage records filed with the county clerk are generally treated as public records under Texas law, subject to limits on the release of certain sensitive information (for example, redaction of identifiers in copies provided to the public may occur under applicable laws or office policy).
  • Divorce and annulment case files are generally public court records, but parts of a file can be restricted by:
    • Court orders sealing specific documents
    • Statutory confidentiality for certain categories (commonly including sensitive information involving minors, certain family-violence-related information, or protected personal identifiers)
    • Required redactions of sensitive data (commonly Social Security numbers and certain financial account information) in records released to the public
  • Certified copies are typically issued by the custodial office (county clerk for marriage records; district clerk for court decrees) under established identification, fee, and certification procedures. State-issued vital record copies and verifications follow DSHS eligibility rules and identity requirements.

Education, Employment and Housing

Comanche County is a rural county in Central Texas on the western edge of the Hill Country, anchored by the city of Comanche and smaller communities such as De Leon and Gustine. The county has a relatively low population density, an older-than-state-average age profile, and a community context shaped by agriculture, small manufacturing/services, and school-centered civic life. Recent demographic and housing figures are commonly reported through the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey; county-level labor force indicators are commonly reported through the Texas Workforce Commission and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Education Indicators

Public school systems and campuses (public)

Comanche County’s public K–12 education is primarily served by three independent school districts:

  • Comanche Independent School District (Comanche ISD)
  • De Leon Independent School District (De Leon ISD)
  • Gustine Independent School District (Gustine ISD)

Campus-level school counts and names change over time with consolidations and grade reconfigurations; the most reliable public directory is the Texas Education Agency’s district/campus listings (searchable by district/county) via the Texas Education Agency (TEA) school directory. As a countywide proxy, these three small districts typically operate one elementary campus per community, plus a secondary campus (middle/junior high and high school, sometimes combined).

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratios (proxy): District-level ratios in rural Texas districts commonly fall in the low-to-mid teens (students per teacher). Specific Comanche County district ratios are published in TEA’s annual district profiles and snapshot reports; see TEA’s Texas Academic Performance Reports (TAPR).
  • Graduation rates: Texas reports graduation using the 4-year longitudinal graduation rate. District and campus graduation rates for Comanche ISD, De Leon ISD, and Gustine ISD are reported in TAPR. County-aggregated graduation rates are not always presented as a single figure; district rates serve as the standard proxy.

Adult educational attainment (countywide)

County adult education levels are typically sourced from the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates. The most consistently available county measures include:

  • High school diploma (or higher), age 25+
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher, age 25+

For the most recent consolidated county estimates, use the U.S. Census Bureau’s data.census.gov (tables commonly used include ACS educational attainment tables such as DP02/S1501). In rural Central Texas counties similar to Comanche, attainment is usually characterized by high rates of high-school completion and below-state-average bachelor’s attainment, reflecting the county’s occupational mix and out-commuting to larger labor markets for professional roles.

Notable programs (STEM, CTE, AP/dual credit)

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE): Rural Texas districts commonly emphasize CTE pathways aligned with regional demand (ag mechanics/ag science, health science, business, welding, automotive, and trades). TEA CTE participation and program offerings are typically documented in district improvement plans and TAPR.
  • Advanced coursework: Advanced Placement (AP) participation varies by campus size; dual credit/college-credit options are commonly used in smaller districts via regional community college partnerships. District-level advanced course indicators are included in TAPR and, in some years, College/Career/Military Readiness (CCMR) metrics.

School safety measures and counseling resources

Texas public schools follow statewide safety and mental-health frameworks that include:

  • Required emergency operations plans, drills, and threat assessment processes; see TEA’s overview of school safety and preparedness on the TEA Health, Safety, and Discipline pages.
  • School counseling and mental-health supports are generally provided through campus counselors and referral networks; state requirements and recommended practices are summarized by TEA and related Texas school safety guidance. District-specific staffing levels (including counselors) are typically found in TAPR staffing sections.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent available)

County unemployment is reported monthly/annually by the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) and BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) series. The most recent official figure should be taken from:

In rural Central Texas counties, unemployment is typically low-to-moderate and seasonal, with fluctuations tied to construction, agriculture-related activity, and regional service demand. (A single numeric rate is not provided here because the prompt requires the most recent year available and that value is time-sensitive; TWC/BLS publishes the definitive current rate.)

Major industries and employment sectors

Based on typical county employment structures for Comanche County’s peer counties and the county’s rural context, leading sectors generally include:

  • Educational services and public administration (school districts and county/city services as major stable employers)
  • Health care and social assistance (clinics, long-term care, and related services)
  • Retail trade and accommodation/food services (small-town commercial activity)
  • Construction (residential, oil-and-gas-related activity in the broader region, and local infrastructure)
  • Agriculture and related services (ranching, hay/crop activity, ag services)
  • Small manufacturing/repair services (light industrial and equipment-related services)

For sector shares based on residence and workplace characteristics, ACS “industry by occupation” and “class of worker” tables on data.census.gov provide county estimates.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

County occupational patterns in similar rural Texas counties typically show higher shares in:

  • Management/business/office support (small business, school administration, clerical)
  • Service occupations (food service, building/grounds maintenance, protective services)
  • Sales and office
  • Construction, extraction, and maintenance (skilled trades, mechanics)
  • Transportation and material moving
  • Education and health-related occupations

ACS occupation tables on data.census.gov provide the county’s distribution by major occupational group.

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

  • Typical pattern: A significant share of workers in rural counties commute within the county for education/health/public-sector roles and out of county for higher-wage opportunities in larger nearby employment centers.
  • Mean travel time to work: ACS reports a county mean commute time; rural counties often have mean commutes in the mid-20-minute range, with a long tail of longer commutes for out-of-county workers. The authoritative county value is available through ACS commuting tables (e.g., DP03) on data.census.gov.
  • Mode of transportation: Commuting is predominantly driving alone, with limited fixed-route transit and modest carpool shares typical of rural areas.

Local employment versus out-of-county work

ACS includes “place of work” indicators showing the share who work:

  • in the county of residence versus
  • outside the county

Rural counties often show a sizable out-of-county commuting share due to dispersed job locations and limited local specialization. The definitive Comanche County proportions are available via ACS place-of-work tables on data.census.gov.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership rate and rental share

Home tenure is reported by ACS (owner-occupied vs renter-occupied). Rural Texas counties typically have high homeownership rates relative to metro areas. The most recent county homeownership and rental shares are available through ACS housing profile tables on data.census.gov (often DP04).

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units: Reported by ACS (DP04). Comanche County generally reflects below-metro median values but has followed the broader Texas pattern of notable appreciation since 2020, with moderation in some markets afterward.
  • For market-based sales trends (distinct from ACS survey medians), county-level home value indices may be available through third-party aggregators; the ACS remains the standard public reference for consistent county comparisons.

Typical rent prices

  • Median gross rent: Reported by ACS (DP04). Rural counties typically show lower median rents than Texas metros, with limited multifamily inventory influencing volatility in measured medians.

Types of housing

Comanche County’s housing stock is commonly characterized by:

  • Single-family detached homes as the dominant type (in town and on rural parcels)
  • Manufactured housing present at higher shares than urban counties (common in rural Texas)
  • Limited apartment stock, concentrated near town centers (Comanche and De Leon)
  • Rural lots and ranch properties outside incorporated areas, with larger parcel sizes and agricultural use

These patterns align with ACS “units in structure” distributions (DP04) and county appraisal data for parcel-level land use.

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools or amenities)

  • Comanche (county seat): Greatest proximity to county services, primary retail, and district campuses; the most walkable access to civic amenities is typically near the town center.
  • De Leon and Gustine: Smaller-town contexts where schools function as key community anchors; amenities are more limited and dispersed.
  • Unincorporated/rural areas: Longer driving distances to schools, groceries, and health services; housing is more likely to be on larger lots with on-site water/septic in some areas.

Because neighborhood-level walkability and amenity proximity is not consistently published as county statistics, these characteristics function as a qualitative proxy consistent with rural town settlement patterns.

Property tax overview (average rate and typical homeowner cost)

Texas property taxes are primarily local (county, school district, city, and special districts). A countywide “average rate” can vary substantially by taxing jurisdiction, but typical components include:

  • School district M&O and I&S rates (often the largest share of a homeowner’s bill)
  • County rate
  • City rate (for incorporated areas)
  • Special districts (where applicable)

Authoritative rate and levy information is available through:

“Typical homeowner cost” depends on taxable value after exemptions (especially the homestead exemption) and the combined local rates. Countywide median tax payments are commonly reported by ACS (owner costs/taxes) and can be retrieved from ACS housing cost tables on data.census.gov.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Texas