Lynn County is a county in northwestern Texas, situated on the South Plains of the Llano Estacado and bordering the New Mexico–oriented High Plains region to the west of the state’s interior. Created in the late 19th century and organized in the early 1900s as settlement expanded across the plains, it developed around ranching and dryland agriculture, later adding irrigated farming supported by the region’s groundwater resources. Lynn County is small in population, with a dispersed settlement pattern typical of the rural Panhandle–South Plains transition zone. The landscape is predominantly flat to gently rolling prairie with cultivated fields, sparse tree cover, and open horizons shaped by a semi-arid climate. The local economy centers on agriculture and related services, with oil and gas activity also present in the broader area. The county seat is Tahoka, which serves as the primary administrative and civic center.

Lynn County Local Demographic Profile

Lynn County is a county in northwest Texas on the South Plains, with Tahoka as the county seat. For local government and planning resources, visit the Lynn County official website.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau’s data.census.gov portal, Lynn County had a total population of 5,596 in the 2020 Census (Decennial Census, 2020).

Age & Gender

County-level age distribution and sex composition are published by the U.S. Census Bureau in the Decennial Census and the American Community Survey (ACS). Exact figures can be retrieved from the county profile tables via data.census.gov (Lynn County, TX).

Racial & Ethnic Composition

County-level race and Hispanic/Latino origin counts for Lynn County are published in the Decennial Census (2020). Exact figures can be retrieved from the county profile tables via data.census.gov (Lynn County, TX).

Household & Housing Data

Household counts, average household size, housing unit totals, and occupancy (owner-occupied vs. renter-occupied) are published for Lynn County in the Decennial Census and ACS. Exact figures can be retrieved from the county profile tables via data.census.gov (Lynn County, TX).

Email Usage

Lynn County is a sparsely populated rural county on the South Plains, where longer distances between communities and fewer last‑mile providers can constrain household internet quality and redundancy, shaping reliance on email for formal communication.

Direct county-level email usage statistics are not routinely published; email adoption is commonly inferred from digital-access proxies such as broadband subscriptions and household computing access. The most consistent local benchmarks come from the U.S. Census Bureau (American Community Survey), which reports county profiles for broadband subscription and computer ownership, and from the FCC National Broadband Map, which documents advertised fixed and mobile broadband availability by location.

Age structure influences email adoption because older adults often maintain email for healthcare, government, and financial accounts, while younger residents may substitute messaging and social platforms for personal communication. Lynn County’s age distribution can be reviewed via Census county demographic profiles. Gender distribution is not a primary predictor of email use at the county scale; it is best treated as contextual demographic composition rather than a driver.

Connectivity limitations in rural West Texas commonly include fewer provider choices, variable fixed-wireline reach outside towns, and capacity constraints during peak use, affecting reliable email access and attachment-heavy workflows.

Mobile Phone Usage

Lynn County is a sparsely populated county on the South Plains of West Texas, with Tahoka as the county seat. The county’s largely flat terrain and agricultural land use generally support wide-area radio propagation, while low population density and long distances between settlements tend to reduce the economic incentive for dense cell-site deployment. These rural characteristics commonly shape both network availability (where signals exist) and adoption (whether households subscribe to mobile and mobile broadband services).

Network availability (coverage) in Lynn County

FCC-reported mobile voice and broadband coverage

The most consistent public, county-relevant view of where mobile networks are reported to be available comes from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) broadband availability datasets and mapping tools. These sources describe provider-reported coverage by technology (including 4G LTE and 5G variants) rather than household take-up.

  • The FCC’s National Broadband Map provides location-level views of reported mobile broadband availability by provider and technology (4G LTE, 5G), which can be examined for Lynn County specifically using the map interface and downloads. Source: FCC National Broadband Map.
  • The FCC’s broadband data collection (BDC) methodology and supporting documentation describe how availability is reported and the limitations of provider-reported coverage polygons. Source: FCC Broadband Data Collection (BDC).

Limitations: FCC availability reflects reported service areas and modeled coverage; it does not measure signal quality indoors, performance at specific times, or whether residents subscribe.

4G and 5G presence

At the county level, publicly standardized, adoption-like metrics by generation (4G vs 5G usage) are generally not published. Availability must be inferred from coverage layers rather than observed usage:

  • 4G LTE is typically the baseline mobile broadband technology in rural West Texas and is the most widely mapped category in FCC mobile broadband availability.
  • 5G availability in rural counties is often uneven and can include differing categories (e.g., low-band “5G” with broader coverage versus higher-frequency deployments with more limited range). The FCC map differentiates technologies, but does not directly quantify how many residents actually use 5G-capable devices or plans.

Household adoption vs availability (clearly distinguished)

Household adoption indicators (county-level)

Direct county-level measures of “mobile penetration” (for example, the share of residents with a mobile subscription) are not commonly published in a single, official series. The most widely used proxy in official statistics is the American Community Survey (ACS) measure of whether households have any cellular data plan (a household internet subscription type), which reflects adoption, not availability.

Interpretation:

  • ACS “cellular data plan” indicates a household reports a mobile data subscription used to access the internet.
  • This measure does not indicate whether the plan is primary or supplemental to fixed broadband, nor does it indicate 4G/5G generation.

Adoption vs availability

  • Availability (coverage): Best represented by FCC broadband availability mapping and provider-reported coverage footprints.
  • Adoption (subscription): Best represented by ACS household subscription reporting (e.g., cellular data plan), and by other subscription statistics that may exist at broader geographies (statewide or multi-county regions) rather than Lynn County alone.

Mobile internet usage patterns (county-level evidence and constraints)

What can be stated with public data

  • Technology availability (4G LTE / 5G) is assessable via the FCC map at fine geographic scales for Lynn County, but it remains an availability measure rather than observed use. FCC National Broadband Map.
  • Household-reported mobile-internet subscription (cellular data plan) is available through ACS tables for Lynn County. data.census.gov.

What is generally not available at county level

  • County-specific breakdowns of actual usage such as “share of mobile traffic on 5G,” “average mobile speeds by technology,” or “smartphone-only internet dependence” are typically not published as official county statistics. Third-party analytics may exist, but they are not standardized as public administrative datasets.

Common device types (smartphones vs other devices)

Public, county-level statistics separating smartphone ownership from other device types (feature phones, tablets, hotspots) are limited.

  • The ACS does not directly report smartphone ownership; it reports subscription categories (including cellular data plans) and device availability in a limited way through “computer” presence in the household, which does not map cleanly to smartphone vs non-smartphone mobile devices. Source: data.census.gov.
  • National surveys from federal statistical agencies tend to publish smartphone measures at national or broad regional levels rather than small counties.

What can be stated without speculation:

  • In Lynn County, official public datasets more reliably describe internet subscription types (including cellular data plans) than specific mobile device types.
  • Device-type composition (smartphone vs other mobile devices) for Lynn County is therefore best treated as not directly measured in commonly used public county datasets.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity

Rural settlement pattern and population density

  • Lynn County’s rural character and dispersed population increase the importance of wide-area coverage and reduce the density of infrastructure typical in urban areas. This affects network availability (fewer towers, larger coverage areas per site) and can influence adoption (households may rely more on mobile where fixed options are limited, or may have lower take-up where service quality is constrained).
  • County demographic and housing characteristics (population size, density, income, age distribution) are available via the Census Bureau. Source: Census Bureau data (data.census.gov).

Transportation corridors and community centers

  • In rural counties, coverage quality commonly varies between towns (such as the county seat) and more remote areas. FCC availability layers provide a way to compare reported coverage in and outside town footprints, but this remains provider-reported availability rather than measured performance. Source: FCC National Broadband Map.

State and regional broadband planning context

Texas broadband programs and planning documents often discuss rural connectivity constraints (including mobile and fixed), though they may not provide Lynn County-specific mobile adoption metrics.

Data limitations specific to Lynn County

  • Mobile penetration in the sense of per-person mobile subscriptions is not typically published as an official county statistic.
  • 4G vs 5G usage is not generally measured publicly at the county level; available public sources primarily capture availability, not actual use.
  • Device type mix (smartphones vs feature phones vs hotspots) is not directly reported for Lynn County in the standard federal county tabulations most commonly used for broadband analysis.
  • The most defensible county-level approach is to combine (1) FCC availability mapping for reported 4G/5G coverage with (2) ACS household subscription indicators for adoption, while explicitly keeping these concepts separate.

Social Media Trends

Lynn County is a sparsely populated county on the South Plains of West Texas, with Tahoka as the county seat and an economy closely tied to agriculture (notably cotton) and related services. The county’s rural geography, older age profile, and long travel distances to larger regional hubs such as Lubbock tend to align with social media use patterns seen in rural parts of Texas: heavier reliance on mobile access, strong usage of a few mainstream platforms, and community/news sharing through network-based apps.

User statistics (penetration and active use)

  • Local (county-level) social media penetration: Public, methodologically consistent county-level estimates for “% of residents active on social platforms” are generally not published by major survey programs; most reputable sources report at the national level or, at most, state/metro aggregates.
  • Best available benchmark (U.S. adults): Approximately 69% of U.S. adults use at least one social media site, according to the Pew Research Center social media fact sheet. Lynn County usage is typically assessed by applying such national benchmarks alongside local demographics (rurality and age distribution).
  • Texas/rural context: National survey results consistently show lower usage in rural areas than urban/suburban areas, while still representing a majority of adults. Pew routinely breaks out social media use by community type in its underlying survey reporting (see the same Pew Research Center dataset summaries and detailed tables referenced there).

Age group trends

Reputable U.S. survey data show age as the strongest predictor of social media use frequency and platform mix:

  • Highest overall usage: Ages 18–29 have the highest social media adoption and tend to use multiple platforms daily.
  • Broad mainstream usage: Ages 30–49 remain high-adoption, with heavy use of Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.
  • Lower adoption, different emphasis: Ages 50–64 and 65+ use social media at lower rates on average, with greater concentration on Facebook and YouTube and less use of Snapchat/TikTok.
  • Source: Pew Research Center, Social Media Use in 2024 (fact sheet).

Gender breakdown

Across major platforms, U.S. survey data show modest but consistent gender skews:

  • Women are more likely than men to report using Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest.
  • Men are more likely than women to report using YouTube and some discussion- or gaming-adjacent platforms in other Pew reporting.
  • These patterns are most reliably cited at the national level; county-specific gender splits are not typically available from public surveys.
  • Source: Pew Research Center platform-by-demographic tables (via the fact sheet).

Most-used platforms (share of U.S. adults)

Publicly comparable platform penetration figures are most defensible using national survey estimates:

  • YouTube: ~83% of U.S. adults
  • Facebook: ~68%
  • Instagram: ~47%
  • Pinterest: ~35%
  • TikTok: ~33%
  • LinkedIn: ~30%
  • WhatsApp: ~29%
  • Snapchat: ~27%
  • X (formerly Twitter): ~22%
  • Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)

Patterns most relevant to rural West Texas counties like Lynn County, supported by national research on rural users and platform behavior:

  • Video as a default format: High YouTube reach reflects video’s role in news, weather, sports highlights, how-to content, and entertainment; short-form video growth (TikTok, Instagram Reels, YouTube Shorts) is strongest among younger adults. Source: Pew Research Center platform adoption and age distributions.
  • Facebook as a community information layer: In rural areas, Facebook commonly functions as a hub for local announcements, school and sports updates, community groups, and buy/sell activity, concentrating engagement into fewer platforms than in large metros. Source: Pew Research Center social media demographic patterns.
  • Messaging and small-network sharing: Usage often shifts from public posting toward private or small-group sharing (Messenger/WhatsApp/SMS), especially for family coordination and local word-of-mouth. This aligns with broader findings that personal networks and direct sharing are central to how many adults distribute and receive information online. Source: Pew Research Center Internet & Technology research.
  • Time-of-day engagement cadence: Rural users often show strong engagement in early morning, lunch, and evening windows (commute is less relevant; workday breaks and after-work hours dominate), with heavy mobile use; these are common engagement rhythms observed in platform analytics reporting broadly, though not typically published at county resolution by neutral survey organizations.
  • Platform preference by purpose:
    • Local/community updates: Facebook (groups/pages)
    • Entertainment and learning: YouTube
    • Younger social and short-form video: TikTok/Instagram/Snapchat
    • Professional networking: LinkedIn (highest among college-educated adults)
      Source: Pew Research Center platform-by-demographic summaries.

Family & Associates Records

Lynn County, Texas maintains family and associate-related public records through the County Clerk, District Clerk, and the local registrar for vital events. Birth and death certificates are Texas vital records created at the state level and filed locally; certified copies are generally issued by the local registrar/County Clerk office or the state. Adoption records are handled through the courts and are generally not public; related filings are maintained with the District Clerk.

Public-facing databases commonly include real property records (deeds, liens) and some civil/probate indexes through county or third-party platforms. Lynn County offices and contacts are listed on the official county site: Lynn County, Texas (official website). Vital records statewide information and ordering are provided by the Texas Department of State Health Services: Texas Vital Statistics (DSHS).

Access occurs in person at the relevant clerk’s office for certified copies and for viewing many case/land records. Some records may be available online through linked portals from the county website or through Texas statewide systems such as the Texas.gov Vital Records (V.S. Rapid/VitalChek) service.

Privacy restrictions apply to vital records (including identity verification for certified copies), and to court-sealed matters such as adoptions and certain family-law filings. Fees, ID requirements, and availability vary by record type and office.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

Marriage-related records

  • Marriage licenses and marriage applications: Issued at the county level and used to authorize a marriage ceremony. After the ceremony, the license is typically returned to the issuing county clerk for recording, creating the recorded marriage instrument.
  • Marriage records (recorded licenses/returns): The recorded version of the license that shows the marriage was performed and registered.
  • Annulments (decrees of annulment): Annulments are handled as civil court matters and result in a court order/decree rather than a “license” record.

Divorce-related records

  • Divorce case files: Court-maintained files that can include petitions, citations/returns, orders, and the final judgment.
  • Divorce decrees (final judgments): The dispositive court order ending the marriage, sometimes referred to as the “Final Decree of Divorce.”

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

Lynn County (local custody)

  • Marriage licenses/recorded marriage instruments: Maintained by the Lynn County Clerk (County Clerk’s office), which serves as the local registrar for recorded instruments and vital events recorded at the county level.
  • Divorces and annulments: Filed in the Lynn County district court and/or county-level court with family law jurisdiction (as assigned). The District Clerk typically maintains district court case records, including divorce and annulment case files and decrees.

State of Texas (index/verification copies)

  • Texas maintains statewide vital statistics functions through the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), Vital Statistics. DSHS generally provides state-level verification letters and indexes for certain vital events and time periods, while certified copies of many marriage records are commonly issued by the county where recorded.

Access methods (common for Texas counties)

  • In-person access: County Clerk and District Clerk offices provide public counters for requesting copies and, where available, viewing non-confidential records.
  • Mail and remote requests: Many Texas clerk offices accept written requests with identification and fees for certified or non-certified copies.
  • Online access: Some counties provide online search portals or third-party indexing for recorded instruments and court dockets; availability and scope vary by office and record type.

Typical information included in these records

Marriage licenses / recorded marriage records

Common data elements include:

  • Full names of the parties (and sometimes prior names)
  • Date the license was issued and the county of issuance
  • Ages or dates of birth (varies by form/version and era)
  • Residences at time of application (often city/county/state)
  • Ceremony date and location (often county/state)
  • Officiant name and title/authority
  • Witnesses (when required by the form used)
  • Clerk’s file number, recording information, and certification/seal on certified copies

Divorce decrees and divorce case files

Common data elements include:

  • Names of petitioner and respondent and case number
  • Court name, county, and judicial district
  • Date of filing and date signed/entered
  • Grounds or statutory basis as pleaded (varies by case and era)
  • Orders concerning property division and debt allocation
  • Orders concerning name change (when granted)
  • Orders concerning children (when applicable), such as conservatorship/custody, support, visitation/access, and medical support
  • Judge’s signature and court seal/certification on certified copies

Annulment decrees

Common data elements include:

  • Parties’ names, case number, and court identification
  • Findings and legal basis for annulment under Texas law
  • Orders addressing property, children (when applicable), and name changes (when granted)
  • Judge’s signature and date of entry

Privacy or legal restrictions

  • Public record baseline: In Texas, many recorded instruments and court records are presumed open to the public, but access can be limited by statute, court order, or redaction rules.
  • Vital record and identity safeguards: Clerk offices commonly require requestor identification for certain certified copies and apply redaction practices to protect sensitive identifiers.
  • Sensitive/confidential case information: Divorce and annulment case files can contain information that may be restricted from public disclosure, including:
    • Information involving minors (certain reports or identifying details)
    • Documents sealed by court order
    • Certain family violence, protective-order-related materials, or other statutorily protected records
  • Redaction: Public-facing copies may be redacted to remove sensitive personal data (for example, Social Security numbers and certain financial account information) consistent with Texas rules and local clerk practices.
  • Certified vs. informational copies: Certified copies issued by clerks bear official certification and are used for legal purposes; informational or plain copies may be available but may not be accepted for legal identity or status proof.

Education, Employment and Housing

Lynn County is a sparsely populated county on the South Plains of West Texas, with Tahoka as the county seat and the main population center. The county’s community context is predominantly rural and agriculture-oriented, with small-town public services and a large share of residents living outside dense urban neighborhoods. Recent population estimates place Lynn County at roughly the mid‑5,000s to mid‑6,000s range, with an older-than-state-average age profile typical of rural West Texas counties (best available, county-level estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts (Lynn County, Texas)).

Education Indicators

Public schools (counts and names)

Public K–12 education in Lynn County is primarily provided by Tahoka Independent School District (Tahoka ISD), and the county also includes students served by nearby-area districts depending on address (common in rural counties). School names commonly listed for Tahoka ISD include:

  • Tahoka Elementary School
  • Tahoka Middle School
  • Tahoka High School

A consolidated directory view is available through the Texas Education Agency (TEA) “Find a School” tools and district profiles.

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratio: County-specific ratios are typically reported at the district/campus level rather than as a county aggregate. For the most current ratios, the most reliable proxy is the district’s TEA campus and district profile reporting. TEA’s public reporting provides staffing counts and enrollment used to derive student–teacher ratios (best available source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports (TAPR)).
  • Graduation rate: Lynn County’s graduation outcomes are best represented through Tahoka ISD’s annual TAPR and statewide accountability summaries, which report 4‑year and 5‑year graduation rates for the district and high school (best available source: TEA TAPR). A single countywide graduation rate is not consistently published as a standalone metric.

Adult education levels

Adult attainment for Lynn County (age 25+) is published by the U.S. Census Bureau and is typically summarized as:

  • High school diploma or higher
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher

The most recent standardized county profile is available from QuickFacts (Lynn County, Texas), which provides the latest ACS-based percentages for these indicators.

Notable programs (STEM, CTE/vocational, Advanced Placement)

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE): Texas public districts generally offer CTE pathways aligned with state endorsements (e.g., Agriculture, Business/Industry, Health Science, STEM). In rural South Plains districts, agriculture mechanics and related vocational coursework are commonly prominent due to the local economy. District-specific program offerings are most accurately verified via TEA district/campus profiles and district course catalogs (proxy source: TEA CTE overview).
  • Advanced Placement (AP)/dual credit: Small rural high schools frequently provide AP and/or dual-credit options, sometimes in partnership with regional colleges, though availability varies by year and staffing. Participation and performance indicators are reflected in TAPR and accountability reports (best available source: TEA TAPR).

School safety measures and counseling resources

Texas public schools operate under state requirements covering:

  • Emergency operations plans, safety drills, threat assessment processes, and school marshal/guardian options (where adopted)
  • Student mental health supports and counseling frameworks, including required training and coordination with local resources

These requirements and guidance are summarized by the TEA School Safety program area and the Texas School Safety Center. Campus-level counseling staffing and services are generally reported in district documents rather than as a countywide statistic.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent available)

The most recent official unemployment estimates for Lynn County are published through the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) series (monthly and annual). The current rate varies month-to-month; the authoritative source for the latest Lynn County value is the BLS county series via the BLS LAUS program and associated county tables.

Major industries and employment sectors

Lynn County’s economy is shaped by:

  • Agriculture (notably cotton and other row crops typical of the South Plains), plus associated support services
  • Government and public services (county government, schools, public safety)
  • Retail trade and basic services concentrated in Tahoka
  • Construction and transportation tied to regional development and agricultural logistics
  • Health care and social assistance at a small-town scale, often supplemented by regional providers

Industry composition and county workforce sector shares are most consistently documented through the U.S. Census Bureau’s county labor-force and industry tabulations in the American Community Survey (best available source: data.census.gov and QuickFacts summaries).

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

In rural South Plains counties, the occupational mix commonly shows higher shares in:

  • Management, business, and administrative roles (often concentrated in public services, small business, and farm operations)
  • Service occupations (education support, food service, health support)
  • Sales and office
  • Construction, extraction, and maintenance
  • Transportation and material moving
  • Production and farming-related work

County-specific occupation percentages are available via ACS occupation tables (best available source: data.census.gov).

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

  • Mean commute time: Rural counties in this region commonly show moderate commute times driven by travel to larger job centers (notably the Lubbock area) for higher-wage employment and specialized services. The most recent Lynn County mean travel time to work is available via ACS commuting tables (best available source: data.census.gov).
  • Mode of commute: The dominant mode is typically driving alone, with limited public transit availability.

Local employment versus out-of-county work

A sizable share of employed residents in Lynn County typically commute out of county, reflecting limited local job density and the pull of regional employment hubs. The most direct measures of in-county versus out-of-county commuting are published in LEHD/OnTheMap origin-destination and “where workers live vs. work” datasets (best available source: U.S. Census OnTheMap).

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership rate and rental share

Lynn County’s tenure profile is reported by the U.S. Census Bureau as:

  • Owner-occupied housing unit share (homeownership rate)
  • Renter-occupied share

Rural West Texas counties typically exhibit higher homeownership and lower rental shares than urban counties, with rentals concentrated near the small city center and around workforce needs. The most recent Lynn County tenure percentages are available via QuickFacts (ACS).

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units: Available for Lynn County through ACS (QuickFacts/data.census.gov).
  • Trend context (proxy): Rural counties in the South Plains experienced value increases during 2020–2023 in line with statewide housing appreciation, often from a lower baseline than metro areas; county medians may show more volatility year-to-year due to small sample sizes in ACS estimates. The most defensible county value is the most recent ACS 5‑year estimate shown on QuickFacts.

Typical rent prices

  • Median gross rent: Published by ACS for Lynn County (best available: QuickFacts).
  • Market context (proxy): Rents tend to be below metro-area medians, with limited inventory and fewer large multifamily properties, producing price dispersion based on unit condition and availability.

Types of housing

Housing stock in Lynn County is predominantly:

  • Single-family detached homes (including older homes in Tahoka and newer infill where available)
  • Manufactured housing/mobile homes (common in rural counties)
  • Rural homesteads and farm/ranch-adjacent lots
  • Limited small-scale multifamily (duplexes/small apartment properties) primarily in or near Tahoka

ACS housing-unit structure type tables provide the county’s percentage breakdown by unit type (best available source: data.census.gov).

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools or amenities)

  • Tahoka functions as the primary node for amenities (schools, city services, local retail, civic facilities). Residential areas closer to the Tahoka ISD campuses typically offer shorter school commutes and closer access to public services.
  • Outside Tahoka, residential patterns are low-density rural, with longer driving distances for schooling, groceries, and health services.

Property tax overview (rate and typical homeowner cost)

  • Property tax rates: Texas property taxation is levied by overlapping jurisdictions (county, school district, and any applicable city/special districts). Rates are set locally and vary by appraisal year and jurisdiction. The most current Lynn County and Tahoka ISD-related rates are published by local appraisal and taxing entities; statewide methodology and transparency portals are provided by the Texas Comptroller property tax overview.
  • Typical homeowner cost (proxy): A practical proxy is annual property taxes = taxable value × combined local rate, adjusted for exemptions (homestead, over‑65/disabled, etc.). County-specific median tax payments and housing-cost measures are also available through ACS housing cost tables on data.census.gov, though small-county sampling can increase estimate uncertainty.

Other Counties in Texas