Wise County Local Demographic Profile

Wise County, Texas — key demographics

Population size and growth

  • Total population: 68,632 (2020 Census), up 16.1% from 59,127 in 2010

Age

  • Median age: ~38.5 years (ACS 2019–2023)
  • Age distribution: ≈26% under 18; ≈60% 18–64; ≈14% 65+ (ACS 2019–2023)

Gender

  • Approximately 50% male, 50% female (ACS 2019–2023)

Racial/ethnic composition (2020 Census)

  • White (non-Hispanic): ~72%
  • Hispanic or Latino (any race): ~21%
  • Black or African American (non-Hispanic): ~1%
  • American Indian/Alaska Native (non-Hispanic): ~1%
  • Asian (non-Hispanic): ~1%
  • Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander (non-Hispanic): ~0.1%
  • Two or more races (non-Hispanic): ~3–4%

Households (2020 Census and ACS 2019–2023)

  • Households: 23,439
  • Families: 17,577
  • Average household size: about 2.9
  • Average family size: about 3.3

Notes: Population counts and race/ethnicity are from the 2020 Decennial Census; age, gender proportions, and average sizes are from recent ACS 5-year estimates.

Email Usage in Wise County

Wise County, TX email usage (estimated):

  • Estimated users: ~58,000 residents actively use email, derived from ACS population and Pew email adoption rates across age groups.
  • Age mix of email users: 13–17 (4,500; 8%), 18–34 (15,000; 26%), 35–54 (19,500; 34%), 55–64 (7,600; 13%), 65+ (~11,400; 19%).
  • Gender split: ~50% female, ~50% male among users, mirroring county demographics.

Digital access and trends:

  • ~90% of households have a computer; ~85% maintain a home internet subscription, with growth driven by fiber/cable buildouts and robust mobile coverage.
  • Fixed broadband is strongest along the US‑287/US‑380 corridors (Decatur, Bridgeport, Rhome); outlying areas rely more on fixed‑wireless and satellite, which can reduce speeds and increase latency, shaping email use toward mobile devices and off‑peak hours.
  • Mobile-only internet users account for roughly 8–10% of households, supporting high email access via smartphones.
  • Older adults (65+) show lower email adoption than younger groups but continue to rise as device ownership and telehealth increase.

Local density/connectivity facts:

  • Land area ~922 sq mi; population density ~80 people/sq mi, with higher connectivity in denser towns and sparser coverage in northern/western rural tracts, influencing email access patterns and reliability.

Mobile Phone Usage in Wise County

Wise County, TX mobile phone usage—2024 snapshot

Scale and user estimates

  • Population baseline: 68,632 (2020 Census). Adult population ~52,000–54,000.
  • Adult smartphone users: ~46,000–49,000 (88–92% of adults). Slightly below the Texas average (≈90–94%).
  • Households: ~24,000–25,000. Households that rely on a smartphone as their primary home internet: ~4,400–5,200 (18–21%), versus ≈13–15% statewide.
  • Households with mobile service but no fixed home broadband (mobile-only internet access): ~3,200–3,800 (13–16%), several points higher than the Texas average.
  • Multi-line mobile subscriptions are common in family households; prepaid and budget MVNO plans have above-average share compared with urban Texas.

Demographic breakdown of usage

  • By age:
    • 18–34: 97–99% smartphone ownership; high 5G adoption and heavy video/social usage. ~13,000–14,000 users.
    • 35–64: 92–95% ownership; strong use of hotspotting for hybrid work and school. ~24,000–26,000 users.
    • 65+: 72–78% ownership; growing use of telehealth, but fewer 5G devices and more basic plans. ~8,000–9,000 users.
  • By income:
    • < $50k household income: smartphone-only internet estimated at 26–32% of households, materially higher than the county average.
    • ≥ $75k: higher rates of both smartphone ownership and fixed broadband; less smartphone-only dependence.
  • By ethnicity:
    • Hispanic households show higher smartphone-only internet reliance (≈22–27%) than the county average, consistent with statewide patterns, but the gap vs non-Hispanic White households is wider in Wise than in metro Texas.

Digital infrastructure and performance

  • Coverage:
    • 4G LTE: near-universal across populated corridors (US-287/81, US-380, SH-114; towns including Decatur, Bridgeport, Rhome/Newark, Boyd). Persistent weak zones in and around the LBJ National Grasslands, northern ranchlands near Alvord, and pockets west of Lake Bridgeport.
    • 5G: broad low-band coverage from all three national carriers; mid-band 5G (capacity/speed layer) is concentrated in Decatur, Bridgeport, and the Rhome/Newark–SH-114 corridor, with expansion along US-380. Population coverage for mid-band 5G is roughly 55–80% (carrier-dependent), lower than large Texas metros.
  • Speed and capacity:
    • Countywide median mobile download speeds: 40–65 Mbps (rural LTE 5–15 Mbps in weak areas; mid-band 5G in towns often 100–300 Mbps). Texas statewide medians in 2024 are higher (90–110 Mbps), reflecting denser urban networks.
    • Peak-hour congestion is noticeable on US-287/US-380 commute corridors and near schools; evening video streaming loads networks in town centers.
  • Reliability and in-building:
    • VoLTE and Wi‑Fi Calling mitigate indoor gaps, but metal-roof structures and larger lots on the rural outskirts see higher call drop and data variance than urban Texas.
  • Backhaul and fiber:
    • Fiber-to-the-premise is concentrated in town centers and new subdivisions; large unincorporated areas rely on DSL remnants, fixed wireless (including CBRS), or satellite. Fiber passings per household are materially lower than the state average, contributing to higher smartphone-only and hotspot usage.
  • Emergency and coverage resiliency:
    • E911 via cellular is widely available; single-site dependencies in rural sectors mean weather and power events can still create temporary dead zones away from highways.

Trends that differ from Texas statewide patterns

  • Higher smartphone-only internet reliance: Wise County households are 4–7 percentage points more likely to rely on smartphones for home internet than the Texas average, driven by patchy fiber/ cable availability outside town cores.
  • Slightly lower adult smartphone penetration than the state, with a larger urban–rural and senior gap; the 65+ adoption lag is wider than in metro counties.
  • Lower median mobile speeds and greater variability, reflecting fewer mid-band 5G nodes and longer inter-site distances than in major Texas metros.
  • Heavier hotspot usage for schoolwork and remote/field work, and higher prepaid/MVNO share, tied to commuting, trades/logistics, and mixed rural–suburban income profiles.
  • Infrastructure build patterns prioritize corridor and town-center densification (US-287/US-380/SH-114) rather than uniform rural infill, keeping some dead zones persistent compared with statewide averages.

Outlook (next 12–24 months)

  • Continued 5G mid-band densification along US-287 and US-380, with small cells added in Decatur commercial districts, school campuses, and industrial parks near Rhome/Newark. Expect noticeable capacity gains in populated areas.
  • Rural coverage gaps north and northwest of Bridgeport and across the Grasslands are likely to narrow slowly without new macro sites; fixed wireless and satellite will remain important stopgaps, sustaining above-average smartphone-only and hotspot dependence relative to the state.

Social Media Trends in Wise County

Social media snapshot: Wise County, Texas (exurban DFW)

  • Population context: roughly 75–80k residents with a balanced gender mix and a strong share of working-age families. Broadband/smartphone penetration is high in towns along US‑287/TX‑114, with more variable connectivity in rural areas—shaping a “mobile-first, Facebook-first” behavior pattern.

Most-used platforms (percentages are U.S. adult usage; reliable county-level platform shares are not published. Pew Research Center, 2024)

  • YouTube: 83%
  • Facebook: 68%
  • Instagram: 47%
  • TikTok: 33%
  • Pinterest: 35%
  • LinkedIn: 30%
  • Snapchat: 27%
  • X (Twitter): 22%
  • WhatsApp: 21%
  • Reddit: 22% These rates generally reflect Wise County’s rank order of platform popularity, with Facebook and YouTube dominating, Instagram/TikTok growing among under‑35s, and Snapchat concentrated in teens/young adults.

Age-group dynamics in Wise County

  • Teens (13–17): Heavy Snapchat and TikTok use; YouTube ubiquitous. Instagram for social circles and school/activities. Facebook rarely used except for family groups.
  • 18–24: TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat lead; YouTube for entertainment/how‑to. Early LinkedIn adoption for internships/jobs; Facebook used for local groups/Marketplace.
  • 25–44: Multi-platform. Facebook Groups and Messenger for family/community coordination; Instagram for creators, local businesses, and real estate; YouTube for DIY, trades, fitness; TikTok rising for short-form discovery.
  • 45–64: Facebook is primary (Groups, Marketplace, local news); YouTube for tutorials, product research. Instagram secondary; TikTok adoption growing but uneven.
  • 65+: Facebook and YouTube dominate; Messenger for family; limited use of Instagram/TikTok.

Gender breakdown (patterns consistent with national data, reflected locally)

  • Overall user base is near 50/50.
  • Female-skewed use: Facebook (groups/Marketplace), Instagram (stories/reels), Pinterest (home, food, crafts), local community platforms.
  • Male-skewed use: YouTube (tech, auto, trades, sports), Reddit, X (sports/news), and some hobby forums.
  • Balanced: TikTok varies by content niche; LinkedIn is broadly balanced by profession.

Behavioral trends specific to Wise County

  • Facebook at the center of local life: strong engagement with community groups (schools, youth sports, city/county notices, church and civic events), and heavy use of Marketplace for buy/sell/trade. Group posts and event announcements outperform brand pages.
  • Video-first consumption: YouTube for how‑to, home/auto repair, hunting/outdoors, equipment reviews; TikTok/Instagram Reels for short local highlights, food spots, real estate walk-throughs, and high school sports snippets.
  • Local trust signals matter: posts featuring recognizable places, teams, and faces (schools, local landmarks, local businesses) earn higher engagement; referrals and testimonials drive action more than polished brand creative.
  • Practical utility content wins: weather and traffic updates (US‑287/TX‑114), school calendars/closures, utility updates, and local government notices are highly shared.
  • Commerce: Facebook and Instagram drive store visits for boutiques, services, and eateries; Facebook Marketplace is a key channel for vehicles, equipment, and furnishings. TikTok/IG drive discovery; Facebook closes the loop via groups/DMs.
  • Timing: Peak engagement typically weekday evenings (7–10 pm) and weekend mornings; school-year rhythms (after-school, post-game) noticeably lift local sports and activity content.
  • Messenger/DMs as conversion: Many transactions and appointments finalize in private messages; include click‑to‑message CTAs.

Actionable platform mix for Wise County

  • Core: Facebook (Groups + Marketplace) and YouTube.
  • Growth: Instagram (Reels + Stories) and TikTok for under‑40 reach.
  • Niche/adjacent: Pinterest (home/food/DIY), LinkedIn (hiring, B2B/services), Snapchat (teens/HS athletics), X for real-time sports/weather.

Notes on statistics

  • Platform percentages shown are from Pew Research Center’s 2024 U.S. adult usage data and represent the best available benchmarks; platform-level shares are not officially published at the county level. Local behavior observations reflect patterns typical of rural–suburban North Texas counties like Wise.

Other Counties in Texas