Concho County is a rural county in west-central Texas, situated in the Edwards Plateau region south of San Angelo and northeast of the Colorado River valley. Established in 1858 and later organized in 1879, it developed during the period of frontier settlement and ranching expansion across the Concho River basin, from which it takes its name. The county is small in population, with fewer than 3,000 residents in recent estimates, and has a low population density typical of the surrounding Hill Country–Plateau transition zone. Its economy has historically centered on livestock ranching, with additional activity in oil and gas and related services. The landscape is characterized by rolling grasslands, mesquite and juniper cover, and intermittent waterways that reflect a semi-arid climate. Community life is anchored by small towns and agricultural traditions, with Eden serving as the county seat.
Concho County Local Demographic Profile
Concho County is a rural county in west-central Texas, situated in the Concho Valley region with Eden as the county seat. It lies roughly between San Angelo and the Hill Country fringe, reflecting demographic patterns common to sparsely populated Texas counties.
Population Size
According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts profile for Concho County, Texas, Concho County had:
- Population (2020 Census): 2,722
- Population (2023 estimate): 2,736
Age & Gender
According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts profile for Concho County, Texas (latest available county profile tables):
- Persons under 18 years: ~15.5%
- Persons 65 years and over: ~29.7%
- Female persons: ~50% (QuickFacts provides the female share; the corresponding male share is the remainder)
Racial & Ethnic Composition
As reported in the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts profile for Concho County, Texas (race categories and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity reported separately by the Census Bureau):
- White alone: ~88%
- Black or African American alone: ~0.3%
- American Indian and Alaska Native alone: ~0.5%
- Asian alone: ~0.3%
- Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone: 0.0%
- Two or more races: ~10%
- Hispanic or Latino (of any race): ~19%
Household & Housing Data
From the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts profile for Concho County, Texas:
- Households: ~1,250
- Average household size: ~2.1
- Owner-occupied housing unit rate: ~76%
- Housing units: ~1,850
- Median value of owner-occupied housing units: ~$115,000
- Median gross rent: ~$700
For local government and planning resources, visit the Concho County official website.
Email Usage
Concho County is sparsely populated rural West Texas, where long distances between households and service nodes can constrain fixed-line buildout and make digital communication more dependent on available broadband and devices.
Direct, county-level email usage statistics are not routinely published, so email access is summarized using proxy indicators from the U.S. Census Bureau (American Community Survey), including household broadband subscription and computer ownership. These measures track the practical ability to create and regularly use email accounts for work, school, government services, and commerce.
Age structure is relevant because older populations tend to have lower adoption of online services; Concho County’s age distribution (ACS) provides context for expected lower routine email use relative to younger counties, even when connectivity exists. Gender distribution is generally less predictive of email adoption than age and connectivity; ACS sex composition can be used mainly for population context rather than as a primary driver.
Connectivity limitations are typically tied to fewer provider options, higher per-household deployment costs, and gaps in last‑mile coverage; broadband availability and performance constraints are commonly documented in FCC National Broadband Map data.
Mobile Phone Usage
Concho County is a sparsely populated, predominantly rural county in west-central Texas (the Edwards Plateau/Concho River area) with small population centers (notably Eden, the county seat) and large distances between homes, ranchland, and services. Low population density and long backhaul distances are structural factors that often constrain mobile network buildout economics and can produce coverage gaps outside towns and along less-traveled roads.
Key data limitations at the county level
County-specific statistics are not consistently published for (1) mobile phone ownership/penetration, (2) smartphone share, and (3) 4G/5G usage behavior. The most reliable county-relevant information typically comes from:
- Modeled network availability (coverage) datasets (not direct measurements of service quality or adoption) from the FCC National Broadband Map.
- Survey-based household adoption measures that are usually reported at national/state levels or for larger geographies via the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS).
- State planning and program context from the Texas Broadband Development Office.
The sections below clearly separate network availability from household adoption and usage.
Network availability (coverage) in Concho County (availability, not adoption)
Primary source: The FCC National Broadband Map provides location-based availability for mobile broadband, including 4G LTE and 5G (by provider technology). This dataset represents reported or modeled coverage and does not guarantee reliable indoor service, consistent speeds, or service affordability.
4G LTE availability
- In rural Texas counties such as Concho, 4G LTE coverage is typically the baseline mobile broadband layer and is generally more extensive than 5G.
- Coverage tends to be strongest in and around incorporated areas (Eden) and along major road corridors; it can be weaker in remote ranchland and lower-traffic areas where tower spacing is wider.
County-specific LTE availability must be taken directly from the FCC map’s Concho County view (provider-by-provider and technology-by-technology), since summarized county tables are not uniformly published elsewhere.
5G availability (and why it varies)
- 5G availability in rural counties frequently appears in two forms on the FCC map:
- Low-band 5G: broader geographic reach but often similar real-world performance to strong LTE because it shares spectrum and site density constraints.
- Mid-band or higher-capacity 5G: usually concentrated near population centers and higher-demand areas; it is less common in very low-density terrain due to required site density and backhaul.
The FCC map distinguishes provider coverage footprints; the county will typically show patchier 5G than LTE, with the most continuous 5G more likely near towns and along main routes.
Terrain, distance, and infrastructure factors affecting availability
- Low population density increases the distance between cell sites, affecting outdoor coverage continuity and indoor signal strength.
- Topography and vegetation on the Edwards Plateau and river breaks can create localized signal shadowing, affecting coverage in valleys and behind ridgelines.
- Backhaul constraints (limited fiber routes in very rural areas) can reduce the ability to add capacity and support high-performance 5G beyond small hubs.
Household adoption and mobile “penetration” (use/ownership) in Concho County (adoption, not availability)
County-level mobile ownership metrics are limited. The most widely used public indicators for household device and internet subscription come from the American Community Survey (ACS) “Computer and Internet Use” tables, but interpretation at small-county scale can be constrained by sampling variability and by the way the ACS categorizes access.
What can be measured from public data (with caveats)
- The ACS reports household internet subscription types (including “cellular data plan” as a form of internet subscription) and device access categories.
- For very small counties, single-year ACS estimates can be unreliable; multi-year (typically 5-year) estimates are more commonly used for stability.
- These measures indicate household adoption (subscription/device presence), not network coverage or performance.
A practical way to reference Concho County’s adoption indicators is through the county profiles and downloadable ACS tables available via data.census.gov, which can show:
- Share of households with an internet subscription that includes a cellular data plan.
- Share of households with smartphone/computer/tablet access (where the ACS device categories apply).
Distinguishing “access” from “adoption”
- Network availability: Whether mobile broadband is reported as available at a location (FCC map).
- Household adoption: Whether households subscribe to cellular data plans and possess internet-capable devices (ACS). A location can be covered by LTE/5G but still show lower adoption due to affordability, digital skills, credit requirements for postpaid plans, or preference for fixed connections where available.
Mobile internet usage patterns (4G vs 5G) (usage behavior vs coverage)
County-level statistics on actual usage by generation (LTE vs 5G) are generally not published in public datasets. Public sources primarily show:
- Availability layers (FCC map).
- Broadband subscription types at the household level (ACS), which do not separate LTE from 5G usage.
Given these constraints, the most defensible county-level statements are:
- The FCC map provides the best public view of where 4G LTE and 5G are available in Concho County, by provider and technology.
- Public survey sources do not provide a county-level breakdown of actual LTE vs 5G usage, typical speeds, or on-device behavior.
Common device types (smartphones vs other devices)
Direct county-level device-type shares are limited. The ACS includes measures related to device availability and internet access, but does not function as a mobile-device market share survey.
What can be stated with public data constraints:
- The ACS “Computer and Internet Use” topic can indicate households with smartphone access and broadband subscriptions that may be cellular-only or combined with other services, accessible via data.census.gov.
- Market-share details such as iOS vs Android, feature phone prevalence, and hotspot/router use are generally proprietary (carrier or analytics firms) and not published at Concho County resolution.
Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity
Rural settlement pattern and distance to services
- Dispersed housing and ranchland increase reliance on mobile coverage for travel and field work but also increase the likelihood of coverage variability between towers.
- Small-town clustering means network performance and 5G presence are often strongest in and near Eden relative to outlying areas.
Income, age structure, and subscription choices (data constraints)
- Demographic variables associated with mobile-only internet reliance (income constraints, age distribution, and educational attainment) are typically measurable through ACS county profiles, but isolating mobile-specific behaviors requires careful use of ACS internet-subscription tables rather than general demographic tables.
- In rural counties, mobile-only households can be present even when fixed broadband exists, but county-specific attribution requires ACS internet subscription detail from data.census.gov rather than generalized assumptions.
Transportation corridors and emergency communications
- Rural counties often see better continuous coverage along major highways relative to farm-to-market roads, reflecting tower placement and demand density. Verification for Concho County requires location-by-location inspection using the FCC National Broadband Map.
- Public safety and emergency communications planning is typically coordinated through county and regional entities; basic county context can be referenced through the Concho County official website (administration and local services), though it does not provide detailed consumer mobile metrics.
Summary: what is known vs not publicly measured for Concho County
Known with public, county-relevant sources
- Reported/modelled 4G LTE and 5G availability by provider and technology via the FCC National Broadband Map.
- Household internet subscription categories including cellular data plan adoption indicators via data.census.gov (ACS), with small-area reliability caveats.
Not reliably available at Concho County resolution in public sources
- True “mobile penetration” as individual-level phone ownership (as opposed to household subscription indicators).
- Smartphone vs feature phone prevalence, handset platform shares, or detailed device mix.
- Observed LTE vs 5G traffic shares, typical on-device speeds, latency, or time-of-day congestion patterns.
Social Media Trends
Concho County is a sparsely populated rural county in west‑central Texas (county seat: Paint Rock) within the San Angelo region. Its small population, long travel distances, and reliance on agriculture/ranching and regional service centers tend to increase the practical value of mobile connectivity for communication, local news, and community coordination, while also reflecting broader Texas and U.S. patterns in platform choice.
User statistics (penetration / active use)
- Direct county-level social media penetration figures are not published consistently by major U.S. survey programs. Most reliable measurement is available at U.S. (and sometimes state) level rather than for very small counties.
- Benchmark (U.S. adults): About 69% of U.S. adults report using at least one social media site, according to the Pew Research Center social media fact sheet. This provides the most-cited baseline for local comparisons where county-specific surveys are unavailable.
- Rural context: Rural residents are generally somewhat less likely than urban/suburban residents to use major social platforms, but the gap has narrowed over time; Pew’s ongoing internet and technology research summarizes these patterns across geographies in its Internet & Technology publications.
Age group trends (highest-use groups)
Based on U.S. adult patterns reported by Pew:
- Highest overall social media use: Adults ages 18–29 (typically the highest penetration across most platforms).
- Next highest: 30–49, followed by 50–64.
- Lowest: 65+, though usage remains substantial on some platforms (notably Facebook).
Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
Gender breakdown
Across the U.S., gender differences vary by platform rather than by “social media overall.” Key, widely cited patterns include:
- Women are more likely than men to use some platforms (notably Pinterest and, to a lesser extent, Facebook in many survey waves).
- Men are more likely than women to use some discussion- or broadcast-oriented platforms (for example, Reddit historically skews male).
Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
Most-used platforms (with benchmark percentages)
County-specific platform shares are rarely published for very small counties; the most reliable available percentages are national benchmarks from Pew (U.S. adults):
- YouTube: ~83%
- Facebook: ~68%
- Instagram: ~47%
- Pinterest: ~35%
- TikTok: ~33%
- LinkedIn: ~30%
- X (Twitter): ~22%
- Snapchat: ~27%
- WhatsApp: ~29%
- Reddit: ~22%
Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)
- Video-heavy consumption: YouTube’s high reach nationally aligns with broad use cases in rural areas (how-to content, news clips, entertainment, local interest videos). National usage levels are documented by Pew: platform-by-platform adoption data.
- Community information utility: Facebook remains a central channel in many small communities for event announcements, informal local news sharing, and group-based coordination. Pew consistently reports Facebook as the most widely used platform among U.S. adults after YouTube: Pew social media fact sheet.
- Age-driven platform clustering: Younger adults concentrate more activity on Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat, while older adults cluster more on Facebook and YouTube. This pattern is reflected in Pew’s age-by-platform breakdowns: age trends by platform.
- Messaging and private sharing: Use of messaging-forward platforms (for example, WhatsApp) is significant nationally; sharing in smaller geographies often occurs via private messages and closed groups rather than public posting, consistent with broader U.S. trends documented by Pew: Pew adoption and usage summaries.
Family & Associates Records
Concho County family and associate-related public records include vital records and court records maintained by county and state offices. Birth and death records are registered through the Texas vital statistics system; certified copies are issued by the Texas Department of State Health Services Vital Statistics Section (Texas Vital Statistics) and, for eligible local issuance, by the Concho County Clerk. Marriage records (marriage licenses) are typically filed with the County Clerk, along with related instruments such as assumed names and some family-related filings.
Adoption records are handled through the courts and are generally sealed under Texas law; access is restricted to authorized parties through court order or authorized processes. Divorce records are part of district court case files; filings and dispositions are maintained locally and may be accessible through the district clerk.
Public database access in Concho County is commonly provided for property and tax-related association records. Deed and lien records are recorded by the County Clerk, and searchable access may be available through the clerk’s office or its posted resources (County Clerk records information). Property ownership and appraisal information is maintained by the local appraisal district (Concho County Appraisal District).
In-person access is provided at the Concho County courthouse offices listed on the county website (Concho County, Texas). Privacy restrictions commonly apply to birth records, adoption files, and certain sensitive information redactions in public records.
Marriage & Divorce Records
Types of records available
Marriage records (licenses/returns)
- Marriage license application and license: Issued by the Concho County Clerk.
- Marriage return: The officiant’s completed certificate/return is recorded with the County Clerk after the ceremony, creating the county’s recorded marriage record.
- Informal (common-law) marriage declaration: Declarations of informal marriage may be filed/recorded with the County Clerk in Texas counties, including Concho County, when executed by both parties.
Divorce records
- Divorce case file: Includes pleadings, orders, and the final judgment; maintained by the District Clerk for the court that heard the case.
- Final decree of divorce: The signed final judgment in the case file; copies are obtained through the District Clerk.
Annulment records
- Annulment case file and decree: Annulments are handled as civil court matters; records are maintained by the District Clerk for the court with jurisdiction.
- In Texas practice, annulment outcomes are reflected in a final judgment/decree in the court file (not as a “marriage record” maintained by the County Clerk, other than any separate recordings that may exist).
Where records are filed and how they can be accessed
Concho County Clerk (marriage records and recorded instruments)
- Filed/recorded with: Concho County Clerk (county-level vital/recording functions).
- Access:
- Requests are commonly handled in person or by written request to the County Clerk’s office.
- The clerk typically provides certified copies of marriage records upon request and payment of statutory fees.
Concho County District Clerk (divorce and annulment court records)
- Filed with: Concho County District Clerk (custodian of district court case records).
- Access:
- Copies of divorce decrees and annulment judgments are obtained through the District Clerk’s records department.
- Case files are public court records in Texas, subject to statutory and court-ordered confidentiality limits and redactions.
Texas statewide index and verification (vital events)
- The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), Vital Statistics maintains statewide vital-event data used for verification/abstract services (including marriage and divorce verification for certain years). County clerks and district clerks remain the primary sources for certified copies of county-recorded marriage records and court judgments. Reference: Texas DSHS Vital Statistics.
Typical information included in these records
Marriage license/record (County Clerk)
- Full legal names of both parties
- Date the license was issued
- County and file/recording information (book/page or instrument number)
- Date and place of marriage ceremony (as shown on the return)
- Name and title/authority of officiant
- Signatures and attestations required by Texas law
- In some records: ages/dates of birth, residences, and other application details (content varies by form and era)
Divorce decree and case file (District Clerk)
- Style and cause number of the case; court and county
- Names of the parties and date of divorce
- Findings and orders regarding:
- Property division
- Allocation of debts
- Name change (when granted)
- Child-related orders (conservatorship/custody, possession/access, child support)
- Spousal maintenance (when ordered)
- Some supporting documents in the case file may include sworn inventories, financial information, and details about minor children.
Annulment judgment and case file (District Clerk)
- Case caption/style, cause number, court
- Date of judgment and legal basis for annulment
- Orders addressing property and children (when applicable)
- Ancillary orders (name change, protective orders, support-related orders when authorized)
Privacy and legal restrictions
- Public access baseline: Texas marriage records recorded by a county clerk and Texas court records are generally public records, with access administered by the custodian office (County Clerk for recorded marriage instruments; District Clerk for divorce/annulment case records).
- Certified copies: Certified copies are issued by the custodian office and are used for legal purposes; fees and identification/administrative requirements are set by law and local office procedures.
- Protected/confidential information:
- Certain data in court files may be sealed by court order or made confidential by statute (commonly involving minors, sensitive personal identifiers, or protected parties).
- Texas law and court rules require redaction of specific personal information in many court filings and copies (for example, Social Security numbers and certain financial account numbers).
- Some family-law matters associated with divorce proceedings (such as certain child-related proceedings) can include confidential reports or records not available for public inspection, depending on the document type and court order.
- Vital statistics limitations: State-level DSHS verification services provide confirmation information and do not substitute for a certified copy of the county-recorded marriage record or the court’s certified divorce/annulment judgment.
Education, Employment and Housing
Concho County is a rural county in west‑central Texas on the Edwards Plateau, anchored by the unincorporated community of Paint Rock and smaller ranching communities. The county has a very small population (about 3,300 residents per the most recent American Community Survey estimates) with a relatively older age profile and long travel distances to jobs, services, and regional trade centers such as San Angelo.
Education Indicators
Public schools (campuses and districts)
- Paint Rock Independent School District (ISD) is the county’s local public school system and operates a small, consolidated campus structure serving multiple grade levels (commonly organized as Paint Rock Elementary and Paint Rock High School, though naming and grade configurations can vary by year in very small districts).
- Countywide school-count totals and official campus names are best verified via the Texas Education Agency (TEA) district/campus directory: Texas Education Agency district information.
- Proxy note: Because Concho County’s public education footprint is essentially a single small district with very few campuses, “number of public schools” is typically reported as 1–2 campuses rather than a multi‑campus system.
Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates
- Student–teacher ratio: The U.S. Census Bureau’s ACS often reports countywide “students per teacher” for school enrollment geographies, but this can be unstable in very small counties. District-level staffing ratios are more reliably reported in TEA performance and staffing files.
- Graduation rate: Texas graduation rates are reported at the district and campus level through TEA’s annual accountability and graduation reports. For Concho County, the relevant reporting entity is Paint Rock ISD (and its high school campus).
- Data availability note: County‑specific ratios and graduation rates are frequently suppressed or highly volatile due to small cohort sizes; district-level TEA reporting is the standard reference source.
Adult educational attainment (countywide)
- High school diploma (or higher): Concho County is typically below the Texas average for postsecondary attainment, with most adults having a high school credential as the modal level.
- Bachelor’s degree or higher: The share with a bachelor’s degree is generally lower than statewide levels, reflecting a rural labor market centered on land-based industries and small local services.
- The most recent county educational attainment percentages are available from the U.S. Census Bureau ACS “Educational Attainment” profile tables, commonly accessed through data.census.gov (search “Concho County, Texas educational attainment”).
Notable programs (STEM, CTE, AP/dual credit)
- Very small rural districts in Texas commonly emphasize Career and Technical Education (CTE) pathways aligned with regional demand (agriculture, mechanics, health/first responder basics, business and office skills) and may participate in shared services or regional co‑ops for specialized instruction.
- Advanced Placement (AP) and dual credit: Small districts often use dual credit partnerships with regional colleges more than a wide AP catalog, though AP may be offered selectively depending on staffing.
- Proxy note: Program availability fluctuates year to year in small districts; TEA district profiles and campus report cards provide the most authoritative annual snapshots.
School safety measures and counseling resources
- Texas public schools operate under statewide school safety requirements (including safety planning, visitor management, drills, and required coordination with law enforcement). District-specific safety planning is typically documented in board policies and district safety plans rather than countywide statistics.
- Counseling resources in very small districts are commonly delivered through one counselor serving multiple grade bands and/or shared-service arrangements; staffing levels are best captured in TEA staffing data.
Employment and Economic Conditions
Unemployment rate (most recent year available)
- County unemployment is published by the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (LAUS). The most recent annual average rate varies by year and can move sharply with small labor force counts.
- For the latest annual unemployment rate for Concho County, use Texas Workforce Commission labor market data (county employment/unemployment time series).
Major industries and employment sectors
- The county’s economy is primarily rural, with employment anchored in:
- Agriculture and ranching (cattle, sheep/goats, hay and related support services)
- Local government and public services (school district, county operations)
- Retail and basic services (small trade, repair, food services)
- Construction and transportation tied to rural property and regional connectivity
- Proxy note: In small counties, measured industry shares can be dominated by a few employers (school district, county, small health and service providers), and sector distributions are sensitive to single business openings/closures.
- The county’s economy is primarily rural, with employment anchored in:
Common occupations and workforce breakdown
- Occupational structure typically includes:
- Management and operations (ranch operations, small business management)
- Service occupations (food service, cleaning, protective services)
- Construction, extraction, and maintenance (building trades, mechanics)
- Transportation and material moving (regional hauling, delivery)
- Education and administrative support (public sector and school-related roles)
- The most recent occupation shares for county residents are reported in ACS and accessible via data.census.gov (search “Concho County, Texas occupations”).
- Occupational structure typically includes:
Commuting patterns and mean commute times
- Commuting is frequently regional in rural West Texas, with a meaningful share traveling to larger job centers (notably the San Angelo area) for healthcare, education, retail management, and skilled trades.
- Mean commute time: ACS “Travel time to work” provides a county mean; in rural counties it is often around the mid‑20s to mid‑30s minutes and can be higher for out‑of‑county commuters. The county-specific mean is available via ACS commuting tables on data.census.gov (search “Concho County, Texas mean travel time to work”).
- Local employment vs. out‑of‑county work: In small rural counties, it is common for a substantial minority of employed residents to work outside the county due to limited local job diversity. ACS “County-to-county commuting flows” (where available) and LEHD origin-destination data provide the clearest breakdown:
- LEHD/LODES commuting (U.S. Census) (for origin-destination patterns; coverage varies by dataset year and geography).
Housing and Real Estate
Homeownership and rental share
- Concho County is predominantly owner‑occupied, consistent with rural Texas patterns (higher homeownership than state metro areas). County tenure shares (owner vs renter) are reported in ACS housing tables on data.census.gov (search “Concho County, Texas tenure”).
Median property values and recent trends
- Median owner-occupied home value in Concho County is typically below the Texas median, reflecting rural land-and-home markets, older housing stock, and limited subdivision development.
- Recent trends in rural West Texas often show gradual appreciation with periods of volatility tied to interest rates and regional demand for rural property.
- The most recent median value and year-over-year comparisons are available through ACS “Median value (dollars)” and can be cross-checked with multi-listing/rural land market reports; ACS remains the consistent countywide benchmark: ACS housing value tables.
Typical rent prices
- The rental market is small; “gross rent” medians from ACS are the main consistent estimate. Rents are generally lower than Texas urban medians, with limited multifamily inventory.
- County median gross rent is available via ACS on data.census.gov (search “Concho County, Texas median gross rent”).
Types of housing
- Housing stock is dominated by:
- Single-family detached homes in small communities and along rural roads
- Manufactured homes and scattered rural residences
- Ranch properties and rural acreage tracts, which are a significant component of the real estate market
- Apartments and larger multifamily buildings are limited and concentrated in small pockets, with many renters in single-family or manufactured units rather than large complexes.
- Housing stock is dominated by:
Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools or amenities)
- Residential clustering is most evident around Paint Rock, where proximity to the ISD campus(es), county services, and basic amenities is greatest.
- Outside town, housing is dispersed, and daily access to groceries, healthcare, and specialized services typically requires travel to larger nearby cities.
Property tax overview (average rate and typical homeowner cost)
- Texas property taxes are levied by overlapping local taxing units (county, school district, special districts). In Concho County, the school district tax rate typically represents a large share of the total effective rate for owner-occupied homes.
- Countywide effective tax rates and typical tax bills are most consistently summarized in appraisal and tax office materials and statewide comparators; Texas Comptroller resources provide rate and levy context:
- Proxy note: In rural Texas, effective property tax rates commonly fall in the ~1.3% to ~2.1% range of taxable value depending on exemptions and local rates, with homeowner tax bills strongly influenced by homestead and over‑65/disabled exemptions where applicable. County-specific bills are best inferred from the local appraisal district’s published rates and typical taxable values rather than statewide averages.
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Texas
- Anderson
- Andrews
- Angelina
- Aransas
- Archer
- Armstrong
- Atascosa
- Austin
- Bailey
- Bandera
- Bastrop
- Baylor
- Bee
- Bell
- Bexar
- Blanco
- Borden
- Bosque
- Bowie
- Brazoria
- Brazos
- Brewster
- Briscoe
- Brooks
- Brown
- Burleson
- Burnet
- Caldwell
- Calhoun
- Callahan
- Cameron
- Camp
- Carson
- Cass
- Castro
- Chambers
- Cherokee
- Childress
- Clay
- Cochran
- Coke
- Coleman
- Collin
- Collingsworth
- Colorado
- Comal
- Comanche
- Cooke
- Coryell
- Cottle
- Crane
- Crockett
- Crosby
- Culberson
- Dallam
- Dallas
- Dawson
- De Witt
- Deaf Smith
- Delta
- Denton
- Dickens
- Dimmit
- Donley
- Duval
- Eastland
- Ector
- Edwards
- El Paso
- Ellis
- Erath
- Falls
- Fannin
- Fayette
- Fisher
- Floyd
- Foard
- Fort Bend
- Franklin
- Freestone
- Frio
- Gaines
- Galveston
- Garza
- Gillespie
- Glasscock
- Goliad
- Gonzales
- Gray
- Grayson
- Gregg
- Grimes
- Guadalupe
- Hale
- Hall
- Hamilton
- Hansford
- Hardeman
- Hardin
- Harris
- Harrison
- Hartley
- Haskell
- Hays
- Hemphill
- Henderson
- Hidalgo
- Hill
- Hockley
- Hood
- Hopkins
- Houston
- Howard
- Hudspeth
- Hunt
- Hutchinson
- Irion
- Jack
- Jackson
- Jasper
- Jeff Davis
- Jefferson
- Jim Hogg
- Jim Wells
- Johnson
- Jones
- Karnes
- Kaufman
- Kendall
- Kenedy
- Kent
- Kerr
- Kimble
- King
- Kinney
- Kleberg
- Knox
- La Salle
- Lamar
- Lamb
- Lampasas
- Lavaca
- Lee
- Leon
- Liberty
- Limestone
- Lipscomb
- Live Oak
- Llano
- Loving
- Lubbock
- Lynn
- Madison
- Marion
- Martin
- Mason
- Matagorda
- Maverick
- Mcculloch
- Mclennan
- Mcmullen
- Medina
- Menard
- Midland
- Milam
- Mills
- Mitchell
- Montague
- Montgomery
- Moore
- Morris
- Motley
- Nacogdoches
- Navarro
- Newton
- Nolan
- Nueces
- Ochiltree
- Oldham
- Orange
- Palo Pinto
- Panola
- Parker
- Parmer
- Pecos
- Polk
- Potter
- Presidio
- Rains
- Randall
- Reagan
- Real
- Red River
- Reeves
- Refugio
- Roberts
- Robertson
- Rockwall
- Runnels
- Rusk
- Sabine
- San Augustine
- San Jacinto
- San Patricio
- San Saba
- Schleicher
- Scurry
- Shackelford
- Shelby
- Sherman
- Smith
- Somervell
- Starr
- Stephens
- Sterling
- Stonewall
- Sutton
- Swisher
- Tarrant
- Taylor
- Terrell
- Terry
- Throckmorton
- Titus
- Tom Green
- Travis
- Trinity
- Tyler
- Upshur
- Upton
- Uvalde
- Val Verde
- Van Zandt
- Victoria
- Walker
- Waller
- Ward
- Washington
- Webb
- Wharton
- Wheeler
- Wichita
- Wilbarger
- Willacy
- Williamson
- Wilson
- Winkler
- Wise
- Wood
- Yoakum
- Young
- Zapata
- Zavala