Williamson County Local Demographic Profile
Key demographics for Williamson County, Texas (latest Census/ACS estimates):
Population
- 2023 population estimate: ~679,000 (2020 Census: 609,017; 2010: 422,679)
- One of the fastest-growing large counties in the U.S. since 2010
Age
- Median age: ~37 years
- Under 18: ~25%
- 18–64: ~61%
- 65 and over: ~14%
Gender
- Female: ~50.5%
- Male: ~49.5%
Race and ethnicity (shares; Hispanic is an ethnicity and can be of any race)
- Hispanic/Latino (any race): ~26%
- Non-Hispanic White: ~55%
- Non-Hispanic Black: ~7–8%
- Non-Hispanic Asian: ~8%
- Non-Hispanic Two or more races: ~2–3%
- Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native: ~0.5%
- Non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander: ~0.1%
Households and housing
- Households: ~237,000
- Average household size: ~2.86
- Family households: ~73% of households; married-couple families: ~58%
- Households with children under 18: ~35–36%
- Owner-occupied housing rate: ~70% (renter-occupied ~30%)
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2023 Vintage Population Estimates; 2023 American Community Survey (1-year), tables DP05 (Demographic and Housing Estimates) and S1101 (Households and Families).
Email Usage in Williamson County
Williamson County, TX email usage (max 200 words)
- Estimated email users: ~520,000 residents.
- Age distribution of users: 13–17: 6% (31k); 18–34: 28% (146k); 35–54: 38% (198k); 55–64: 15% (78k); 65+: 13% (~67k).
- Gender split of users: Female 50.5% (263k); Male 49.5% (257k), with near‑parity usage rates.
- Digital access trends: ~94% of households subscribe to broadband; fiber is widely available in Round Rock, Georgetown, Cedar Park, and Leander; 5G covers most populated areas. Adult smartphone ownership is ~90%, supporting strong mobile email engagement. The Austin–Round Rock job mix (tech/professional services) and elevated remote/hybrid work sustain heavy weekday email activity.
- Local density/connectivity facts: Population ~675,000; density ~595 people per sq. mile. Residential and commercial growth concentrates along the I‑35, 183A, and SH‑130 corridors, where multiple ISPs provide overlapping fiber and cable options; many new subdivisions are provisioned for gigabit service.
Insights: Email penetration is effectively universal among working‑age adults, with the largest share in ages 35–54. Seniors are a growing but lower‑intensity cohort, while teens primarily access email via smartphones for school and services. High broadband adoption and fiber/5G coverage keep email usage consistently high across suburban centers.
Mobile Phone Usage in Williamson County
Mobile phone usage in Williamson County, Texas (2023–2024 snapshot)
Headline estimates
- Population base: approximately 680,000 residents; roughly 505,000 adults (18+).
- Adult smartphone users: about 470,000–485,000 (roughly 92–96% of adults, higher than Texas’ ~90%).
- Total active mobile lines (phones, tablets, wearables, IoT): on the order of 900,000–1,000,000 lines countywide, consistent with high multi-line adoption in the Austin metro.
How Williamson County differs from Texas overall
- Higher device penetration: Adult smartphone ownership is several points above the Texas average, reflecting the county’s higher incomes, education levels, and tech-heavy workforce.
- Lower mobile-only reliance: A smaller share of households rely solely on mobile data for home internet (roughly low-teens percentage in the county versus about one-fifth statewide). Fixed broadband availability and adoption are stronger here than the Texas average.
- Heavier data consumption and 5G uptake: Median 5G performance in the Austin metro (which includes Williamson County) ranks among the best in Texas, and 5G-capable device share is measurably higher than the state average. Users in Round Rock, Cedar Park, Georgetown, Leander, and Hutto routinely experience mid-band 5G performance that outpaces statewide medians.
- Platform mix: iOS share skews higher than the Texas average, consistent with higher-income suburban markets; Android remains strong but relatively less dominant than in many parts of the state.
Demographic breakdown of mobile use (drivers and patterns)
- Age
- 18–29: near-universal smartphone adoption (~97–99%); heavy 5G usage and app-centric communication.
- 30–49: very high adoption (~95–97%); high multi-line family plan penetration; strong use of mobile for work and childcare logistics.
- 50–64: high adoption (~88–92%); growing 5G handset share; strong mobile banking/health utilization.
- 65+: adoption in the mid-to-high 70s and rising; larger share retains LTE devices but steady migration to 5G.
- Income and education
- Median household income and bachelor’s attainment exceed Texas averages. Correlates with:
- Higher smartphone and tablet penetration per household
- Earlier adoption of 5G-capable devices
- Lower smartphone-only dependence due to robust fiber and cable broadband take-up
- Median household income and bachelor’s attainment exceed Texas averages. Correlates with:
- Race and ethnicity
- County shares of non-Hispanic White and Asian residents are higher, and Hispanic and Black shares are lower than Texas overall. Because smartphone-only reliance is higher statewide among Hispanic and Black households, the county’s aggregate smartphone-only metric is correspondingly lower than the state’s.
Digital infrastructure and performance
- Coverage
- All three national carriers (AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon) provide countywide LTE and broad 5G coverage, with contiguous mid-band 5G along the I-35 corridor (Round Rock–Georgetown) and throughout fast-growing suburbs (Cedar Park, Leander, Hutto).
- Western rural and conservation areas near the Balcones Canyonlands have more variable performance, with LTE fallback more common and indoor coverage dependent on proximity to arterials and new subdivisions.
- Speeds and capacity
- Mid-band 5G (T-Mobile n41; AT&T/Verizon C-band) delivers typical urban/suburban median downloads well above 100 Mbps, with peak medians in denser corridors frequently exceeding 200 Mbps. LTE medians commonly range 20–60 Mbps where 5G is weak or indoors.
- Network augmentation has focused on I-35, SH-45, SH-130, US-183, and new residential clusters in Leander–Liberty Hill and northeast of Georgetown, reflecting commuter demand and greenfield builds.
- Fixed-wireless availability
- 5G Home Internet (Verizon, T-Mobile) is widely available in incorporated areas and new subdivisions, providing an alternative to cable/fiber. Eligibility is notably higher than many rural Texas counties but remains secondary to the county’s extensive wired broadband footprint.
- Backhaul and fiber
- Multiple long-haul and metro fiber routes traverse the county along I-35, SH-45, and SH-130, with dense enterprise and municipal connectivity around Round Rock and Georgetown. This fiber depth underpins strong 5G backhaul and lowers the need for mobile-only home internet relative to the Texas average.
Behavioral and market trends to watch
- Rapid in-migration and greenfield housing starts continue to shift coverage needs northwest (Leander/Liberty Hill) and northeast (Hutto/Jarrell), driving new small-cell and macro infill.
- Work-from-home and hybrid work patterns sustain high daytime mobile data loads in residential areas, keeping traffic flatter over the day than pre-2020 norms and encouraging continued 5G capacity upgrades.
- Device lifecycle is relatively short in the county; upgrades to 5G-capable phones occur sooner than statewide averages, sustaining higher mid-band utilization and better realized speeds.
Bottom line Williamson County’s mobile ecosystem outperforms Texas averages on adoption and network quality. The county combines near-saturation smartphone use, strong 5G coverage and speeds, and widespread wired broadband, yielding lower smartphone-only dependency and higher multi-line, multi-device usage than the state overall.
Social Media Trends in Williamson County
Williamson County, TX social media snapshot (2025-ready)
Population and internet access
- Total population: ≈670,000 (2023 estimate). Adults 18+: ≈516,000.
- Household internet: very high broadband adoption (low-90% range), supporting near-ubiquitous social access.
Overall social media users (13+)
- Adults using at least one social platform: ≈370,000–385,000 (≈72–75% of adults; national benchmark applied locally).
- Teens (13–17) using social: ≈45,000 (≈95% of teens).
- Total social users (13+): ≈415,000–430,000.
Most‑used platforms among adults (share of adults; estimated user counts)
- YouTube: 83% (~428,000)
- Facebook: 68% (~351,000)
- Instagram: 47% (~242,000)
- Pinterest: 35% (~181,000)
- TikTok: 33% (~170,000)
- LinkedIn: 30% (~155,000)
- WhatsApp: 29% (~150,000)
- Snapchat: 27% (~139,000)
- X (Twitter): 22% (~114,000)
- Reddit: 22% (~114,000)
Audience composition
- Age mix of adult social users (estimated):
- 18–29: ~25%
- 30–49: ~43% (largest slice; family‑forming, commuter cohort)
- 50–64: ~23%
- 65+: ~10%
- Gender (overall): ≈51% female, 49% male (mirrors county population).
- Platform skews: Pinterest (majority female), TikTok/Snapchat (slight female tilt), Facebook (slight female tilt), LinkedIn/X/Reddit (male-leaning), Instagram (near even, slight female tilt).
- Households with children are overrepresented in local Facebook Groups, Instagram, and Snapchat audiences; strong teen penetration in Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube.
- Notable multilingual use: English/Spanish and South Asian languages via WhatsApp and Facebook Groups.
Behavioral trends (what people do and respond to)
- Hyper‑local utility: Heavy use of Facebook Groups and neighborhood apps for school updates (RRISD, LISD, GISD), HOA news, city services, safety, and local recommendations.
- Commerce: Facebook Marketplace and local buy/sell/trade groups are primary channels for used goods, home/yard equipment, and baby/kid items; coupon/discount content performs above average.
- Content formats: Short‑form video (Reels/TikTok/Shorts) drives discovery for restaurants, home improvement, fitness, and family activities; how‑to and DIY thrive on YouTube.
- Community life: Youth sports, churches, and school-related content see high engagement; local event calendars and weekend guides perform well.
- Professional presence: LinkedIn engagement is stronger than the U.S. average due to the north Austin tech/healthcare corridor; weekday, work‑hour activity is common.
- Messaging/private sharing: Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp are preferred for coordinating family, church, sports teams, and neighborhood groups.
- Timing: Peak engagement typically weekday evenings (7–10 pm) and weekend mornings; activity patterns track the school year (spikes around back‑to‑school, holidays, playoffs).
Notes on methodology
- Population and age structure: U.S. Census Bureau ACS (2023 estimates).
- Platform usage rates: Pew Research Center (2023–2024) national adult usage percentages applied to Williamson County’s adult population to produce local estimates. Multi‑platform use means counts across platforms overlap.
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Texas
- Anderson
- Andrews
- Angelina
- Aransas
- Archer
- Armstrong
- Atascosa
- Austin
- Bailey
- Bandera
- Bastrop
- Baylor
- Bee
- Bell
- Bexar
- Blanco
- Borden
- Bosque
- Bowie
- Brazoria
- Brazos
- Brewster
- Briscoe
- Brooks
- Brown
- Burleson
- Burnet
- Caldwell
- Calhoun
- Callahan
- Cameron
- Camp
- Carson
- Cass
- Castro
- Chambers
- Cherokee
- Childress
- Clay
- Cochran
- Coke
- Coleman
- Collin
- Collingsworth
- Colorado
- Comal
- Comanche
- Concho
- Cooke
- Coryell
- Cottle
- Crane
- Crockett
- Crosby
- Culberson
- Dallam
- Dallas
- Dawson
- De Witt
- Deaf Smith
- Delta
- Denton
- Dickens
- Dimmit
- Donley
- Duval
- Eastland
- Ector
- Edwards
- El Paso
- Ellis
- Erath
- Falls
- Fannin
- Fayette
- Fisher
- Floyd
- Foard
- Fort Bend
- Franklin
- Freestone
- Frio
- Gaines
- Galveston
- Garza
- Gillespie
- Glasscock
- Goliad
- Gonzales
- Gray
- Grayson
- Gregg
- Grimes
- Guadalupe
- Hale
- Hall
- Hamilton
- Hansford
- Hardeman
- Hardin
- Harris
- Harrison
- Hartley
- Haskell
- Hays
- Hemphill
- Henderson
- Hidalgo
- Hill
- Hockley
- Hood
- Hopkins
- Houston
- Howard
- Hudspeth
- Hunt
- Hutchinson
- Irion
- Jack
- Jackson
- Jasper
- Jeff Davis
- Jefferson
- Jim Hogg
- Jim Wells
- Johnson
- Jones
- Karnes
- Kaufman
- Kendall
- Kenedy
- Kent
- Kerr
- Kimble
- King
- Kinney
- Kleberg
- Knox
- La Salle
- Lamar
- Lamb
- Lampasas
- Lavaca
- Lee
- Leon
- Liberty
- Limestone
- Lipscomb
- Live Oak
- Llano
- Loving
- Lubbock
- Lynn
- Madison
- Marion
- Martin
- Mason
- Matagorda
- Maverick
- Mcculloch
- Mclennan
- Mcmullen
- Medina
- Menard
- Midland
- Milam
- Mills
- Mitchell
- Montague
- Montgomery
- Moore
- Morris
- Motley
- Nacogdoches
- Navarro
- Newton
- Nolan
- Nueces
- Ochiltree
- Oldham
- Orange
- Palo Pinto
- Panola
- Parker
- Parmer
- Pecos
- Polk
- Potter
- Presidio
- Rains
- Randall
- Reagan
- Real
- Red River
- Reeves
- Refugio
- Roberts
- Robertson
- Rockwall
- Runnels
- Rusk
- Sabine
- San Augustine
- San Jacinto
- San Patricio
- San Saba
- Schleicher
- Scurry
- Shackelford
- Shelby
- Sherman
- Smith
- Somervell
- Starr
- Stephens
- Sterling
- Stonewall
- Sutton
- Swisher
- Tarrant
- Taylor
- Terrell
- Terry
- Throckmorton
- Titus
- Tom Green
- Travis
- Trinity
- Tyler
- Upshur
- Upton
- Uvalde
- Val Verde
- Van Zandt
- Victoria
- Walker
- Waller
- Ward
- Washington
- Webb
- Wharton
- Wheeler
- Wichita
- Wilbarger
- Willacy
- Wilson
- Winkler
- Wise
- Wood
- Yoakum
- Young
- Zapata
- Zavala