Angelina County is located in eastern Texas in the Piney Woods region, near the Louisiana border. Established in 1846 and named for the Spanish mission Nuestra Señora de los Dolores de los Ais, the county has historical ties to early settlement and trade routes in East Texas. It is a mid-sized county by population, with roughly 85,000 residents, and is anchored by the city of Lufkin, the county seat and principal population center. Outside Lufkin, the county is largely rural, with extensive forests, rolling terrain, and numerous creeks and reservoirs associated with the Neches River watershed. The local economy has long been shaped by timber and wood-products industries, along with manufacturing, healthcare, and regional services. Cultural identity reflects broader East Texas traditions, with community life influenced by outdoor recreation, forestry, and small-town institutions.

Angelina County Local Demographic Profile

Angelina County is located in Deep East Texas, with Lufkin as the county seat, and lies within the Piney Woods region of the state. For local government context and planning resources, visit the Angelina County official website.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Angelina County, Texas, the county’s population was 86,395 (2020 Census) and 85,623 (July 1, 2023 estimate).

Age & Gender

According to the U.S. Census Bureau data.census.gov platform (American Community Survey county profile metrics as summarized in QuickFacts), Angelina County’s demographic structure includes:

  • Age distribution (selected)

    • Under 18 years: ~22%
    • 65 years and over: ~17%

  • Gender ratio

    • Female: ~51%
    • Male: ~49%

(These figures are reported as shares of the population in the Census Bureau’s county-level profile tables; exact values vary by ACS release year and table.)

Racial & Ethnic Composition

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Angelina County, Texas (ACS profile shares as presented for the county), the county’s racial and ethnic composition includes:

  • White alone: ~63%
  • Black or African American alone: ~14%
  • American Indian and Alaska Native alone: ~1%
  • Asian alone: ~2%
  • Two or more races: ~3–4%
  • Hispanic or Latino (any race): ~21%

(QuickFacts presents “Hispanic or Latino” separately as an ethnicity; categories are not mutually exclusive with race.)

Household & Housing Data

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Angelina County, Texas, key household and housing indicators for Angelina County include:

  • Households: ~33,000
  • Average household size: ~2.6 persons
  • Owner-occupied housing unit rate: ~63%
  • Median value of owner-occupied housing unit: ~$150,000
  • Median gross rent: ~$950
  • Housing units: ~38,000

(These are county-level measures drawn from the American Community Survey as reported through the Census Bureau’s QuickFacts profile for the county.)

Email Usage

Angelina County’s mix of the city of Lufkin and surrounding rural areas creates uneven digital connectivity; lower population density outside urban centers generally corresponds with fewer wired broadband options and greater reliance on mobile or fixed wireless service for online communication such as email.

Direct county-level email-usage statistics are not typically published, so email adoption is inferred from proxy indicators—primarily household broadband subscription, computer access, and demographics—from the U.S. Census Bureau’s data portal (American Community Survey).

Digital access indicators

ACS tables on household computer ownership and internet subscriptions are standard proxies for email access and regular use, since email commonly requires a consistent internet connection and a usable device (computer or smartphone).

Age distribution and email adoption

Age composition influences email uptake: older populations tend to have lower rates of broadband adoption and device use, while working-age residents often use email for employment, education, and services. County age distribution is available via the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Angelina County.

Gender distribution

Gender shares are generally near parity and are less predictive of email access than age and connectivity; QuickFacts provides county sex distribution.

Connectivity and infrastructure limitations

Infrastructure constraints are more pronounced in rural parts of the county; service availability patterns can be referenced via the FCC National Broadband Map.

Mobile Phone Usage

Angelina County is in Deep East Texas, anchored by the city of Lufkin and surrounded by largely rural land use that includes pine forests, river bottoms, and dispersed settlements. This physical geography and a lower overall population density outside the Lufkin area tend to produce more variable mobile signal quality than in Texas’s major metro counties, particularly along less-traveled corridors and heavily wooded areas where cell-site spacing and terrain/vegetation attenuation can matter.

Network availability (coverage) vs. adoption (use)

Network availability describes whether mobile networks (voice/LTE/5G) are present in a location. Adoption describes whether residents and households actually subscribe to mobile service and use mobile internet. These measures are not interchangeable: an area can be covered but have lower subscription rates due to affordability, device availability, or preferences for fixed broadband.

Mobile penetration / access indicators (county-level where available)

County-specific “mobile phone subscription” rates are not consistently published as a single metric for every U.S. county. The most commonly used county-level proxies come from federal survey tables that measure:

  • Household telephone service, including the share of households that are cell-phone-only (no landline), and
  • Internet subscriptions, including households with cellular data plans (mobile broadband) as a home internet subscription type.

For Angelina County, the best authoritative sources for these access indicators are:

  • The U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) for telephone service and internet subscription types via data.census.gov (tables vary by year; common series include ACS “Selected Housing Characteristics” and detailed internet subscription tables).
  • The Census Bureau’s overview of computer and internet use measurement concepts via the American Community Survey (ACS) and related technical documentation.

Limitation: ACS-based indicators reflect household adoption and self-reported subscription types, not signal quality or on-the-ground availability. They also have margins of error that can be sizable at county scale, particularly for more granular breakouts.

Mobile internet usage patterns (LTE/4G and 5G availability)

4G LTE availability

In most U.S. counties, LTE is the baseline mobile broadband layer. Coverage mapping for Angelina County is most authoritatively represented in federal availability datasets and maps:

  • The Federal Communications Commission’s broadband map and location-based availability data at FCC National Broadband Map, which includes mobile broadband coverage layers and allows inspection of coverage by provider and technology.

How to interpret for Angelina County: FCC mobile availability is fundamentally a coverage claim dataset (with ongoing improvements through the Broadband Data Collection program). It indicates where providers report service as available, not how many residents subscribe or the speeds actually achieved indoors, in vehicles, or under congestion.

5G availability (and typical rural–urban pattern)

5G availability in East Texas tends to be more concentrated around population centers and major highways than in sparsely populated and heavily forested areas, reflecting how 5G deployments often layer onto existing macro sites and prioritize higher-demand zones first. In Angelina County, the FCC map is the primary public source to distinguish areas with reported 5G availability from LTE-only areas:

Limitation: Public datasets generally do not provide countywide, standardized statistics for “share of residents using 5G” at the county level. Availability does not equal adoption; many users remain on LTE-capable devices/plans even where 5G is present.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

At county level, device-type breakdowns (smartphone vs. basic phone vs. hotspot vs. tablet) are rarely published as official statistics. The most defensible, consistently available local proxy is ACS measurement of:

  • Household computing devices (desktop/laptop/tablet/smartphone) and
  • Internet subscription types (including cellular data plans)

These are accessible through data.census.gov for Angelina County.

General pattern supported by national survey design (applied cautiously at county scale):

  • Smartphones are typically the dominant personal mobile device used for internet access in the U.S.
  • Tablets and laptops often appear as secondary devices, with connectivity sometimes provided through home Wi‑Fi or mobile hotspotting.
  • Basic/feature phones persist in smaller shares and are not always cleanly separated in public county tables.

Limitation: Without a county-specific device inventory survey, definitive shares of “smartphones vs. other mobile devices” for Angelina County cannot be stated beyond what ACS tables report for household device availability categories.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage in Angelina County

Urban–rural settlement pattern

  • Lufkin (and nearby developed areas) typically supports denser cell-site placement and better indoor coverage consistency than more remote parts of the county.
  • Rural and forested areas can experience larger gaps between towers and more variable signal strength due to vegetation and distance, affecting both voice reliability and mobile broadband performance.

Authoritative geographic context and community profiles can be drawn from:

Income, age, and affordability correlates (adoption-side drivers)

County-level adoption differences within the U.S. are commonly associated with:

  • Income and poverty rates (affecting ability to maintain postpaid plans and device replacement cycles)
  • Age structure (older populations often show different adoption and usage patterns)
  • Educational attainment (correlated with internet adoption measures)

These correlates are measurable for Angelina County in ACS demographic and socioeconomic tables at data.census.gov. They describe adoption-side conditions rather than physical network availability.

Fixed broadband availability and substitution

In areas with less robust fixed broadband availability, households sometimes rely more on cellular data plans as their primary home connection. The adoption of “cellular data plan” internet subscriptions versus cable/fiber/DSL can be evaluated in ACS internet subscription tables for Angelina County via data.census.gov. Network availability for fixed broadband can be cross-referenced with the FCC National Broadband Map to clearly separate:

  • Fixed availability (infrastructure/service claims) from
  • Household subscription choices (adoption)

Summary of what can and cannot be stated at county level

  • Can be stated with public authoritative sources: reported mobile network availability by technology and provider footprint (FCC mapping); household-level adoption indicators for telephone status, device availability categories, and internet subscription types (ACS).
  • Cannot be stated definitively without additional county-specific measurement: precise smartphone share vs. basic phone share; “percentage of residents using 5G”; performance metrics such as typical indoor speeds by neighborhood (beyond provider/third-party testing datasets, which are not standardized as official county statistics).

Primary reference sources for Angelina County mobile connectivity and adoption indicators include the FCC National Broadband Map (availability) and the U.S. Census Bureau’s data.census.gov (adoption and household access characteristics).

Social Media Trends

Angelina County is in Deep East Texas, anchored by Lufkin as its principal city and regional service hub. The county’s economy includes healthcare, education, retail, and nearby forestry/manufacturing activity, alongside a mix of small-town and exurban communities. This blend of a mid-sized city center with dispersed rural areas tends to produce “mainstream” U.S. social media adoption patterns, with platform choice and intensity varying notably by age and, to a lesser extent, gender.

User statistics (penetration/active use)

  • Overall adult social media use (baseline for county context): About 7 in 10 U.S. adults report using at least one social media site, according to Pew Research Center’s Social Media Fact Sheet. Angelina County does not have an official county-level social media penetration estimate published by major survey organizations; the most defensible benchmark is national usage paired with local connectivity constraints.
  • Internet access as a practical limiter: Social platform participation tracks broadband/smartphone access. County-level connectivity conditions in Texas can be reviewed via the FCC National Broadband Map, which helps contextualize adoption in rural parts of Angelina County relative to the Lufkin area.

Age group trends (highest-use groups)

National survey data consistently shows age as the strongest differentiator:

  • 18–29: Highest overall usage across most platforms; heavy daily and multi-platform use.
  • 30–49: Very high usage; strong presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube; time spent remains high.
  • 50–64: Majority use; comparatively more Facebook and YouTube than newer social apps.
  • 65+: Lowest overall usage but continuing growth; Facebook and YouTube dominate.
    These patterns are documented in the Pew Research Center platform-by-age breakdowns.

Gender breakdown

  • Overall: Women in the U.S. are modestly more likely than men to report using several social platforms (notably Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest), while men are more likely to use some discussion- and creator-centric spaces in certain studies.
  • Platform-specific differences: Pew reports gender splits by platform in its Social Media Fact Sheet, which is the most commonly cited source for U.S. gender-by-platform comparisons.

Most-used platforms (share of U.S. adults; used as the best available proxy)

County-specific platform shares are not typically published; the most reliable comparable percentages come from national probability surveys:

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)

  • Video-first consumption is dominant: YouTube’s near-ubiquity nationally indicates broad cross-age appeal; short-form video growth (TikTok, Instagram Reels) concentrates engagement among younger adults, with spillover into 30–49 groups. (Platform reach levels: Pew platform usage.)
  • Facebook remains the “community utility” layer: In mixed urban–rural counties, Facebook tends to be a primary channel for local news sharing, community groups, event promotion, church/community announcements, and peer-to-peer commerce (Marketplace). This aligns with Facebook’s stronger penetration among 30+ adults in Pew’s age splits.
  • Messaging and private sharing complement public feeds: National usage indicates substantial adoption of WhatsApp and other messaging behaviors; in practice, local coordination (family, schools, sports leagues, community groups) often shifts toward private/group messaging, while public posting frequency is lower than passive consumption.
  • Age drives platform stacking: Younger adults more often maintain multiple active identities (Instagram + TikTok + YouTube; sometimes X), while older adults concentrate time on fewer platforms (Facebook + YouTube), consistent with Pew’s platform-by-age distributions.
  • Local economic structure influences content mix: A service/healthcare/education base (as in the Lufkin trade area) typically supports steady engagement with practical information content (local updates, service recommendations, school/community information), while rural outskirts often show higher reliance on broad-reach platforms (Facebook/YouTube) rather than niche networks.

Family & Associates Records

Angelina County maintains family- and associate-related public records through local and state offices. Birth and death records (vital records) are filed with the county and the State of Texas; certified copies are generally issued by the county clerk for events occurring in the county and by the state registrar. Marriage licenses and divorce-related filings are recorded in county and district court records maintained locally. Adoption records are handled through the courts but are generally sealed from public inspection, with access limited under Texas law.

Public database access is available for several record types. The Angelina County Clerk provides information on vital records services and recorded documents. Court case information and dockets are typically accessed through the Angelina County District Clerk for district court matters, and through the county’s online portal where available. Property and real property filings may be searchable through the county clerk’s records systems described on the clerk’s site. For statewide vital record ordering and eligibility rules, Texas provides official guidance through Texas DSHS Vital Statistics.

Access occurs online via linked record search/ordering systems and in person at the relevant clerk’s office for certified copies and older bound records. Privacy restrictions commonly apply to recent birth records, certain death records, sealed adoption files, juvenile matters, and records containing protected personal identifiers.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

Marriage records (marriage license/return)

  • Marriage license application and issued license: Created and maintained at the county level when a couple applies for a license.
  • Marriage license return (certificate of marriage): The officiant’s completed return filed with the county after the ceremony, documenting that the marriage was performed.

Divorce records

  • Divorce case file: Filed in the district court and typically includes the petition, service/waivers, orders, and other pleadings.
  • Final decree of divorce: The signed final judgment ending the marriage, maintained as part of the court’s record and often separately retrievable as a certified copy of the decree.

Annulment records

  • Annulment case file and decree: Filed and maintained as a civil case in district court. The final judgment is commonly titled a decree of annulment or judgment declaring the marriage void/voidable, depending on the legal basis.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

County clerk (marriage)

  • Filing location: Marriage license records are maintained by the Angelina County Clerk (the county’s official recorder for vital and local records).
  • Access: Copies are requested from the County Clerk’s office; certified copies are issued for legal purposes. Some index information may also be available through county or third-party public record search systems, depending on local availability and date ranges.

District clerk / district courts (divorce and annulment)

  • Filing location: Divorce and annulment actions are filed with the Angelina County District Clerk as civil/family cases in the district courts.
  • Access: Case records and certified copies of final decrees are requested from the District Clerk. Public access is governed by Texas court rules and statutory confidentiality provisions; online access to documents varies by county and by case type.

Texas statewide indexes (supplemental)

  • Divorce verification letters: The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) can issue divorce verification letters for certain years based on statewide vital statistics indexes; this is not a substitute for a certified court decree.
  • Marriage verification letters: DSHS also provides marriage verification letters for certain years based on statewide indexes; this is not a substitute for a certified county marriage record.

Typical information included in these records

Marriage license/return

  • Full legal names of the parties (often including prior names)
  • Dates: application/issuance date and date of marriage ceremony (as returned by officiant)
  • Place of marriage (often city/county; may include venue)
  • Ages or dates of birth (varies by form/era) and residence information (commonly city/county/state)
  • Officiant name/title and signature; sometimes the officiant’s authority information
  • License number, county of issuance, and filing/recording details

Divorce decree and case file

  • Style and cause number of the case; court and county
  • Names of the parties and date of divorce
  • Findings and orders: property division, confirmation of separate property, debt allocation
  • Children-related orders where applicable: conservatorship (custody), possession/access, child support, medical support
  • Spousal maintenance orders where applicable
  • Name change orders where requested and granted
  • Judge’s signature and entry date; sometimes approval signatures of attorneys

Annulment decree and case file

  • Style and cause number; court and county
  • Names of the parties and date of judgment
  • Legal basis for annulment/void marriage determination stated in pleadings and/or findings (level of detail varies)
  • Orders addressing property, debts, and children-related matters when applicable
  • Judge’s signature and entry date

Privacy or legal restrictions

  • Marriage licenses: Generally treated as public records at the county level, subject to limits on access to certain sensitive data elements where applicable under Texas law (for example, some personal identifiers). Certified copies are issued by the County Clerk under established records procedures.
  • Divorce and annulment court records: Court case information is generally public, but access to specific documents can be restricted by statute, court order, or court rules.
    • Sealed records: A judge may seal documents or portions of a file; sealed material is not publicly accessible.
    • Sensitive information: Texas court rules and confidentiality laws restrict public disclosure of certain information (such as minor children’s identifying information in certain contexts, Social Security numbers, and certain protected personal data). Redaction requirements may apply to filed documents.
    • Family violence and protective information: Materials related to family violence, protective orders, and confidential contact information may be protected or limited in access under applicable Texas statutes and court orders.
  • Certified vs. informational copies: Agencies and courts distinguish between informational copies and certified copies. Certified copies are the standard for legal identity, benefits, and court-related purposes and are issued only through the custodian office (County Clerk for marriage records; District Clerk for court decrees).

Education, Employment and Housing

Angelina County is in deep East Texas, anchored by the city of Lufkin and situated along the U.S. 59/I‑69 corridor between Houston and Shreveport. The county is predominantly small‑metro/rural in settlement pattern, with most population and services concentrated in and around Lufkin and smaller communities such as Diboll and Huntington; outlying areas are characterized by timberland, pasture, and low‑density housing. (Core geographic and community context is consistent with standard federal county profiles such as the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Angelina County.)

Education Indicators

Public school systems and campuses (countywide)

Public K–12 education in Angelina County is primarily delivered through multiple independent school districts (ISDs). Commonly referenced districts serving county residents include:

  • Lufkin ISD
  • Diboll ISD
  • Huntington ISD
  • Central ISD (Angelina County)
  • Hudson ISD
  • Zavalla ISD

A single definitive “number of public schools” for the county is not published as a standard county statistic in one place; campus counts vary by year due to consolidations and grade‑reconfigurations. The most reliable way to enumerate current campuses and official school names is through the Texas Education Agency (TEA) Texas Schools directory (filter by county or district).

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratios: District and campus student–teacher ratios are reported annually by TEA and vary across ISDs and grade levels. Countywide aggregation is not typically published as a single official ratio; TEA district profiles provide the most current values at the district level via the TEA Texas Schools lookup.
  • Graduation rates: Texas publishes four‑year graduation rates through the TEA accountability and completion reporting system; graduation rates are available by district and campus rather than as a single county figure. District completion outcomes can be accessed through TEA’s public performance reporting (entry point: Texas Assessments/TEA reporting portals and linked accountability resources).

Data note: Because TEA reporting is organized by district/campus, “Angelina County graduation rate” and “Angelina County student–teacher ratio” are best represented using district‑level values for the ISDs listed above rather than a single county estimate.

Adult educational attainment (countywide)

Adult education levels are available from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey and summarized in county profiles such as QuickFacts:

These are the most widely used county benchmarks for adult attainment and are updated on the Census Bureau’s release schedule.

Notable programs (STEM, CTE, AP/dual credit)

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE): Texas public high schools typically offer state‑standard CTE pathways aligned to regional labor markets (health sciences, manufacturing, transportation/logistics, construction, agriculture/forestry). District‑specific endorsements and program sequences are documented in local course catalogs and TEA CTE reporting.
  • Advanced academics (AP/dual credit): Many East Texas districts offer Advanced Placement and/or dual‑credit opportunities through partnerships with nearby colleges. Angelina County’s community college presence supports dual‑credit and workforce programs through Angelina College (technical certificates, allied health, industrial training, and transfer pathways).

School safety measures and counseling resources

Texas districts operate under statewide school safety requirements and guidance, including emergency operations planning standards and safety program oversight. County districts commonly report:

  • Controlled access and visitor management at campuses
  • School resource officer (SRO) or law‑enforcement coordination
  • Student support services (school counselors; crisis response protocols)

Statewide school safety planning structures and requirements are maintained by TEA (overview entry point: TEA School Safety). Campus‑level counseling staffing and safety details are typically published in district student handbooks and annual reports rather than in a single county dataset.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment (most recent available)

The most current official unemployment rates are published monthly by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (LAUS) and disseminated in Texas through the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC). The county’s latest annual average and recent monthly values are accessible via:

Data note: Because unemployment is updated monthly, the “most recent year” changes frequently; TWC provides the most current county series used for official reporting.

Major industries and employment sectors

Angelina County’s employment base reflects a mix typical of East Texas small metros:

  • Health care and social assistance (major regional employer cluster anchored in Lufkin)
  • Retail trade and accommodation/food services (serving the Lufkin trade area)
  • Manufacturing (including wood products and related manufacturing tied to timber resources)
  • Education services and public administration
  • Construction and transportation/warehousing (regional distribution and local growth/maintenance activity)

Sector composition is documented in federal county profiles and workforce datasets such as the Census Bureau’s County Business Patterns and ACS; consolidated snapshots are often summarized through data.census.gov and county profiles like QuickFacts.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

Occupational mix in similar East Texas counties typically shows higher shares in:

  • Office/administrative support
  • Sales and related occupations
  • Transportation/material moving
  • Production (manufacturing)
  • Health care support and practitioner roles

County‑level occupation distributions (by Standard Occupational Classification groups) are available via ACS tables on data.census.gov. A single county “workforce breakdown” figure varies by year and is best cited directly from the current ACS 1‑year/5‑year release used.

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

  • Commute mode: Personal vehicles dominate commuting in Angelina County, consistent with low‑density development and limited fixed‑route transit outside the Lufkin core.
  • Mean travel time to work: The county’s mean commute time is published in ACS commuting tables and summarized in QuickFacts.

Local employment vs. out‑of‑county work

Angelina County functions as an employment center for surrounding rural areas due to the concentration of employers and services in Lufkin. At the same time, some residents commute to adjacent counties for specialized industrial, energy, or regional service jobs. The best public measure of in‑county vs. out‑of‑county commuting is the Census Bureau’s residence‑to‑workplace flow data (LEHD/OnTheMap), available through:

This source provides counts of workers who live in the county and work inside versus outside the county, and identifies the largest destination counties for out‑commuters.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership and rental share

Angelina County’s owner‑occupied vs. renter‑occupied housing shares are reported in ACS housing tables and summarized in QuickFacts. The county generally reflects a higher homeownership profile than large Texas metros, with renter concentration higher in Lufkin near employment, education, and services.

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median value of owner‑occupied housing units: Published by the Census Bureau (ACS) and summarized in QuickFacts.
  • Recent trends: Like much of Texas, values rose notably during 2020–2022 and then moderated as interest rates increased; county‑specific trend lines are best measured using local appraisal roll data and MLS/market reports. A standardized public proxy is the ACS median value series over time (via data.census.gov).

Data note: For “recent trends” at sub‑annual resolution, MLS data are commonly used but are not a single public county dataset; ACS provides consistent annual/5‑year estimates.

Typical rent prices

  • Median gross rent: Published by ACS and summarized in QuickFacts.
    Rents tend to be lowest in rural parts of the county and higher in Lufkin near job centers, medical facilities, and retail corridors.

Housing stock and development pattern

  • Single‑family homes: Predominant countywide, including established subdivisions in and around Lufkin and small‑town neighborhoods in Diboll/Huntington/Hudson areas.
  • Apartments and multifamily: Concentrated in Lufkin, typically along major arterials and near commercial services.
  • Rural lots and manufactured housing: Common outside the Lufkin urbanized area, reflecting timber/agricultural land patterns and lower‑density residential development.

These characteristics are consistent with the county’s urban‑rural mix and are reflected in ACS structure type distributions (available via data.census.gov).

Neighborhood characteristics (schools and amenities)

  • Lufkin area: Highest proximity to hospitals/clinics, major retail, county services, and the largest concentration of schools and extracurricular facilities.
  • Outlying communities and rural areas: Longer travel times to major amenities; schools often serve as community hubs; housing is more likely to be on larger parcels with septic/well services in some areas.

No single official dataset ranks “neighborhood characteristics” countywide; these are best represented by the county’s settlement pattern and the location of major institutions (school campuses, medical centers, and retail nodes).

Property taxes (rates and typical costs)

Texas property taxes are levied by overlapping jurisdictions (county, school districts, cities, and special districts). Countywide, homeowners’ effective tax burdens are commonly summarized as:

  • Median real estate taxes paid (dollars): Reported in ACS and available in QuickFacts.
  • Effective property tax rate (proxy): Texas‑wide and county‑level effective rates are often estimated by combining taxes paid and home values in ACS; appraisal district and taxing unit rates provide the official adopted rates.

The local administering entity for valuation and many tax roll functions is the Angelina County Appraisal District, which publishes appraisal and taxing information used for billing by tax assessor‑collector offices and other taxing entities.

Data note: “Average rate” varies substantially by school district and whether a property is within city limits or special districts; the most defensible countywide “typical homeowner cost” metric is the ACS median property taxes paid reported in QuickFacts/ACS.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Texas