Ochiltree County is located in the Texas Panhandle in the state’s far northern region, bordering Oklahoma to the north. Established in 1889 and later organized in 1909, it developed as part of the broader settlement and agricultural expansion of the High Plains. The county is sparsely populated and small in scale; it had about 10,000 residents in the 2020 U.S. census. Perryton is the county seat and the principal population center.
The landscape is predominantly flat to gently rolling prairie typical of the Llano Estacado, with a semi-arid climate and wide open rangeland and cropland. The local economy is largely rural and resource-based, centered on agriculture—especially wheat, grain sorghum, and cattle—along with energy activity in the Panhandle region. Community life reflects small-town institutions and regional Panhandle culture, with services, schools, and local government concentrated in Perryton.
Ochiltree County Local Demographic Profile
Ochiltree County is located in the northeastern Texas Panhandle, bordering Oklahoma, with Perryton as the county seat. The county is part of the Panhandle Plains region as defined by state and federal geographic groupings.
Population Size
According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Ochiltree County, Texas, the county’s population was 10,015 (2020) and 9,836 (2023 estimate).
Age & Gender
Age and sex figures are reported by the U.S. Census Bureau through county profiles. The most direct county-level summary tables are available via data.census.gov (search “Ochiltree County, Texas” and use subject filters such as Age and Sex).
A single, standardized countywide age-distribution table is not published on QuickFacts for every geography at the same level of detail; for Ochiltree County, the authoritative breakdowns are provided through data.census.gov table products (e.g., ACS 5-year detailed tables).
Racial & Ethnic Composition
According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Ochiltree County, Texas (latest available QuickFacts profile metrics), the county’s racial and ethnic composition is reported using standard Census categories, including:
- White alone
- Black or African American alone
- American Indian and Alaska Native alone
- Asian alone
- Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone
- Two or more races
- Hispanic or Latino (of any race)
QuickFacts provides county-level percentages for these categories for the most recent profile year shown on that page; for fully detailed race-by-ethnicity cross-tabulations, use data.census.gov (ACS detailed tables).
Household & Housing Data
According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Ochiltree County, Texas, county household and housing indicators are published at the county level, including commonly used measures such as:
- Number of households
- Average household size
- Owner-occupied housing rate
- Median value of owner-occupied housing units
- Median gross rent
- Total housing units
For additional local government and planning resources, visit the Ochiltree County official website.
Email Usage
Ochiltree County, in the Texas Panhandle, combines small-town development (Perryton) with large rural areas, where longer service runs and lower population density can constrain last‑mile connectivity and shape how consistently residents can rely on email.
Direct county-level email usage statistics are not generally published; email adoption is therefore inferred from proxy indicators such as broadband and device access reported by the U.S. Census Bureau (data.census.gov). Key digital access indicators for Ochiltree County include household broadband subscription and computer ownership (desktop/laptop/tablet), which are closely associated with routine email access.
Age structure can influence email use because older residents often maintain email for essential communications (healthcare, government, finance), while younger cohorts may substitute messaging platforms; county age distributions from the American Community Survey provide context but do not measure email directly. Gender composition is available from the ACS and is typically not a primary driver of email access compared with connectivity and device availability.
Infrastructure limitations in rural areas—provider availability, speed variability, and mobile-only reliance—are commonly reflected in county broadband subscription patterns and in statewide infrastructure reporting by the NTIA BroadbandUSA.
Mobile Phone Usage
Ochiltree County is located in the Texas Panhandle along the Oklahoma border, with Perryton as the county seat. The county is predominantly rural and characterized by open plains, agricultural land use, and low population density. These features typically affect mobile connectivity by increasing the distance between cell sites, making coverage more dependent on tower spacing, backhaul availability, and line-of-sight conditions than in dense urban areas.
Key data limitations at the county level
County-specific statistics for “mobile phone penetration” (ownership), device mix (smartphone vs. basic phone), and mobile-only internet reliance are not consistently published at the county level in standard federal datasets. In practice, county-level analysis relies on:
- Network availability maps and broadband deployment datasets (supply-side).
- Survey-based adoption measures that are usually available at state level (demand-side), with county detail often limited or unavailable.
The sections below clearly separate network availability from household adoption and note where county-level detail is not available.
Network availability (coverage and service footprint) vs. adoption (actual use)
Network availability refers to whether mobile networks (4G LTE, 5G variants) are reported to be present in Ochiltree County. Adoption refers to whether residents subscribe to mobile service, own smartphones, and use mobile internet in day-to-day life. Availability can be high while adoption lags due to affordability, device costs, digital skills, or preference for fixed connections.
Mobile penetration and access indicators (adoption proxies)
What is available at county level
- Direct county-level mobile subscription/ownership rates are not typically published in a standardized way from federal sources. The most widely cited adoption figures for phone ownership and smartphone ownership come from national surveys that are robust at national/state scales but not consistently released for each county.
Closest standardized indicators (state/national context; county limitations)
- American Community Survey (ACS) “computer and internet use” tables include measures such as households with an internet subscription and subscription types, but published detail is commonly used at national/state/metro levels; county-level reliability varies by table and year. County-level extraction can be performed via tools on Census.gov data tools, but the availability of specific “cellular data plan” breakdowns and the statistical reliability at small geographies can be limited.
- Small-area estimation products sometimes provide modeled broadband adoption measures at local scales, but these are not the same as directly measured mobile phone penetration and are not always released for each county in a comparable format.
Summary: Standard, directly comparable county-level “mobile penetration” (phone/smartphone ownership) measures are limited; adoption is better characterized using state-level survey indicators and local socioeconomic context, while treating county-level inference cautiously.
Mobile internet usage patterns and generations (4G / 5G)
4G LTE and 5G availability (network-side)
- FCC mobile broadband coverage filings are the main standardized public source for reported coverage by technology generation. The FCC’s broadband data resources and maps provide reported availability for mobile broadband and can be used to evaluate coverage patterns in and around Ochiltree County. Reference: FCC National Broadband Map and FCC broadband data documentation at FCC Broadband Data collection pages.
- The FCC map distinguishes mobile broadband availability from fixed broadband, and it supports technology filtering (e.g., LTE/5G). County boundaries can be used to visually assess reported availability within Ochiltree County, but the data remain provider-reported and are not the same as measured performance everywhere.
Observed usage vs. reported availability (adoption-side)
- Usage patterns (how many residents primarily use mobile internet, how often 5G is used, or reliance on mobile hotspots) are generally not published at county resolution in a standardized public dataset.
- Mobile internet usage in rural counties is often influenced by the relative availability of fixed broadband options, but county-specific substitution between mobile and fixed services is not consistently quantified in public county-level statistics.
Summary: 4G/5G availability can be assessed using FCC mapping and provider reporting; county-level usage patterns (share of users on 5G vs LTE, mobile-only household reliance) are not reliably available as standardized county metrics.
Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)
County-level device mix availability
- Publicly accessible, standardized county-level statistics on smartphone ownership vs. basic phones are generally not published.
- The most-cited device ownership figures (smartphone adoption, types of devices used to access the internet) typically come from national surveys and research programs that report national or state estimates rather than Ochiltree County–specific results.
Practical interpretation for Ochiltree County (with limitations stated)
- Device type distribution in Ochiltree County cannot be stated definitively from a single authoritative county dataset. Any precise share of smartphones vs. other devices would require either proprietary market research, a local survey, or a model-based estimate not universally accepted as a standard reference.
Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity
Rural geography and tower economics (availability constraint)
- Low population density increases per-user infrastructure costs, affecting tower spacing and the economics of deploying additional capacity or new-generation radios.
- Flat terrain and open plains can be favorable for propagation compared with heavily forested or mountainous regions, but coverage still depends on tower placement, spectrum bands used, and backhaul to the site.
- Agricultural land use and long travel distances raise the importance of continuous roadway coverage and can shift demand toward mobile connectivity for work and travel.
Population distribution and service concentration
- Mobile performance and availability often vary between the principal town (Perryton) and the more sparsely populated unincorporated areas. This is an availability and capacity pattern observed broadly in rural counties; however, specific intra-county performance differences require measurement data not provided as an official county statistic.
Socioeconomic factors (adoption constraint)
- Adoption is influenced by income, age distribution, education, and affordability of both service plans and devices. County-level demographic profiles are available through the U.S. Census Bureau’s county pages and data tools, which support describing factors correlated with adoption without asserting precise mobile-ownership rates. Reference: U.S. Census Bureau and county extracts via Census.gov tables and profiles.
Distinguishing availability from adoption in Ochiltree County (summary)
- Availability (network-side): Best supported by FCC-reported mobile broadband coverage datasets and maps, which can show where LTE and 5G are reported as available within the county. Source: FCC National Broadband Map.
- Adoption (household-side): County-level mobile phone/smartphone ownership and mobile-only internet reliance are not consistently available as standardized public metrics. The most defensible public approach is to use ACS internet subscription indicators (where table reliability permits) and state/national survey benchmarks, while clearly noting the absence of definitive county-level mobile penetration statistics.
Relevant public reference points
- FCC broadband availability and mapping: FCC National Broadband Map
- FCC broadband data program background: FCC Broadband Data
- U.S. Census data access for county demographic context and internet subscription tables: Census.gov data platform
- Texas statewide broadband planning context (state-level): Texas Broadband Development Office (Texas Comptroller)
Social Media Trends
Ochiltree County is in the Texas Panhandle on the Oklahoma border, with Perryton as the county seat and principal population center. The local economy is shaped by agriculture, energy, and regional services typical of the High Plains, alongside widely dispersed rural settlement patterns that tend to increase the importance of mobile connectivity and community information channels.
User statistics (penetration / active use)
- Direct county-level “social media penetration” estimates are not published in major U.S. survey series; the most reliable figures are reported at national (and sometimes state/metro) levels rather than for specific rural counties.
- National benchmarks frequently used to contextualize rural counties:
- Overall social media use among U.S. adults: ~7 in 10 report using social media (Pew Research Center: Social Media Fact Sheet).
- Platform-specific reach and demographic patterns are also summarized by Pew in the same source and in its detailed survey reports (Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology).
Age group trends (highest-using cohorts)
Based on national survey patterns (often applied as a reference point for counties without direct measurement):
- 18–29: highest social media usage rates across platforms; strongest presence on visually oriented and short-form video apps.
- 30–49: high overall usage; broad multi-platform adoption (commonly Facebook, YouTube, Instagram).
- 50–64: moderate-to-high usage; stronger tilt toward Facebook and YouTube than newer trend-driven apps.
- 65+: lowest overall usage but still substantial on Facebook and YouTube. Source baseline: Pew Research Center social media demographics.
Gender breakdown
County-specific gender splits by platform are not typically reported; national results provide the standard reference:
- Women tend to be more represented on Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest.
- Men tend to be more represented on YouTube, Reddit, and some discussion-oriented platforms.
- TikTok and Instagram usage is widely distributed but often shows modest gender skews by age cohort. Source baseline: Pew Research Center: platform use by demographic group.
Most-used platforms (with percentages where available)
The most defensible percentages available are national adult-use shares (county-level percentages are generally not published):
- YouTube: ~83% of U.S. adults
- Facebook: ~68%
- Instagram: ~47%
- Pinterest: ~35%
- TikTok: ~33%
- LinkedIn: ~30%
- X (Twitter): ~22%
- Snapchat: ~27%
- WhatsApp: ~29% Source: Pew Research Center: Social Media Fact Sheet (platform adoption estimates).
Behavioral trends (engagement patterns / preferences)
- Multi-platform behavior is common, with Facebook and YouTube functioning as broad-reach “utility” platforms for community information and entertainment, while Instagram/TikTok skew more toward younger audiences (national pattern; Pew).
- Rural information ecosystems tend to emphasize:
- Community updates and local news sharing (often concentrated on Facebook pages/groups).
- Video consumption (YouTube) as a high-penetration format across age groups.
- Engagement style by age (general pattern):
- Younger adults: higher likelihood of frequent posting, short-form video interaction, and creator-following.
- Older adults: higher likelihood of passive consumption, sharing community updates, and event-related engagement (notably on Facebook and YouTube).
- Platform preference alignment with local context: In counties with dispersed populations and strong local institutions (schools, churches, civic groups), group-based and page-based communication on established platforms typically plays an outsized role relative to niche networks.
Note on data availability: For Ochiltree County specifically, the most reliable approach is to use national survey benchmarks (Pew) and pair them with local population and age structure from official demographics such as the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts profile for Ochiltree County to contextualize likely audience composition, since reputable sources generally do not publish platform penetration percentages at the county level.
Family & Associates Records
Ochiltree County family and associate-related public records include vital records and court documents that establish relationships. Texas birth and death records are created at the state level and locally recorded; certified copies are generally issued through the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) Vital Statistics. Local registration and some record requests may be handled through the Ochiltree County Clerk (vital record filings, marriage records, and archival functions).
Adoptions in Texas are handled through district court proceedings; adoption files are typically sealed and not available for public inspection. Related family-case filings and other relationship-relevant civil records are maintained by the district clerk. Ochiltree County court records access is coordinated through the Ochiltree County District Clerk.
Public online databases at the county level are limited; locally maintained indexes, recorded instruments, and some case information may require in-person access or direct request to the appropriate clerk. State-level searchable resources include DSHS informational services and, for some court matters, statewide systems referenced through local clerk offices.
Privacy restrictions commonly apply to recent birth/death records (issued as certified copies under eligibility rules), sealed adoption records, and certain protected court or family-violence-related filings.
Marriage & Divorce Records
Types of records available
- Marriage license and marriage record (certificate/return): Issued by the Ochiltree County Clerk and recorded in the county’s official records after the officiant returns the completed license. These records document the legal authorization to marry and the fact/date of the marriage as recorded.
- Divorce records (final decrees and case files): Created and maintained by the district court that has jurisdiction in Ochiltree County. The principal record of a divorce is the Final Decree of Divorce, along with related pleadings and orders in the case file.
- Annulment records (decrees and case files): Annulments are handled through the courts in the same manner as divorce proceedings, resulting in a signed decree/order and an associated civil case file.
Where records are filed and how they can be accessed
Marriage records
- Filed/recorded by: Ochiltree County Clerk (county-level recording and vital-record functions for the county).
- Access methods: In-person request at the County Clerk’s office; written/mail requests are commonly used; some counties also provide online index search or third-party access to recorded instruments. Certified copies are issued by the County Clerk for marriage records maintained by the county.
Divorce and annulment records
- Filed/maintained by: District Clerk for the district court serving Ochiltree County (court case records, including divorce and annulment).
- Access methods: In-person review of public court files and requests for copies through the District Clerk; some Texas courts also provide online case search portals or indexes, while full documents may require clerk processing and payment of copy fees.
State-level vital statistics (verification/abstract services)
- Maintained by: Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), Vital Statistics maintains statewide vital-event records and provides certain statewide services (such as marriage or divorce verifications/letters and certified copies where authorized by law and record type).
- Reference: Texas DSHS Vital Statistics
Typical information included in these records
Marriage license / marriage record
- Full names of spouses (including prior names as reported)
- Date and place of marriage (county)
- Date license issued; date marriage occurred; date returned/recorded
- Officiant name/title and signature; spouse signatures (as applicable)
- Ages/dates of birth and addresses are commonly collected during application; the exact fields present vary by form version and time period
Divorce decree / divorce case file
- Names of parties; cause number; court and county
- Date the divorce was granted; judge’s signature
- Findings and orders addressing property division, debt allocation, name change (when granted), and other relief
- When children are involved, orders may include conservatorship/custody terms, possession/visitation schedules, child support, medical support, and related provisions
- Case file commonly includes petition, service/waiver documents, orders, and sometimes financial information filed with the court
Annulment decree / annulment case file
- Names of parties; cause number; court and county
- Date of decree; judge’s signature
- Declaration that the marriage is annulled (treated as invalid as of legal determination) and related orders (property, children-related orders when applicable)
- Supporting pleadings and orders within the case file
Privacy or legal restrictions
Public-record status
- Marriage records recorded by the County Clerk are generally public records under Texas law, and certified copies are available through the clerk.
- Court records (divorce/annulment) are generally public, but access can be limited by statute, court rule, or specific court orders.
Restricted or confidential information
- Courts may seal parts of a file or restrict access to sensitive filings by order.
- Certain information is commonly protected or redacted in public copies, such as Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, and some sensitive personal identifiers, under Texas privacy protections and court rules.
- Records involving minors, protective orders, or family-violence-related confidentiality may have additional access limits or redactions depending on the filings and applicable law.
Certified copies and identity requirements
- Clerks typically require requester identification and payment of statutory fees for certified copies.
- State-level vital-statistics services may provide verifications or certified copies depending on record type, eligibility rules, and the date range of the record held by the state.
Education, Employment and Housing
Ochiltree County is in the Texas Panhandle along the Oklahoma border; its county seat and primary population center is Perryton. The county is a sparsely populated, rural community with an economy tied to agriculture, energy, and local services, and with housing dominated by single-family homes and rural property.
Education Indicators
Public schools (count and names)
Public K–12 education is primarily provided by Perryton Independent School District (ISD), the main district serving the county. Campus names commonly listed for Perryton ISD include:
- Perryton High School
- Perryton Junior High School
- Perryton Elementary School
- Ochiltree County Elementary School (county-area elementary campus)
Campus lists and grade configurations can change over time; the most authoritative directory is the Texas Education Agency “Texas School Directory” (Texas School Directory).
Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates
- Student–teacher ratio (proxy): County-level ratios are not consistently published as a single metric across sources. A practical proxy is district-level staffing and enrollment reported by TEA for Perryton ISD in annual district profiles (see TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports (TAPR) and Snapshot).
- Graduation rates (proxy): The most comparable measure in Texas is TEA’s four-year longitudinal graduation rate at the district and campus level (available in TAPR and the Texas School Report Cards). These are the standard references for graduation outcomes rather than county aggregates (see Texas School Report Cards).
Adult educational attainment
County adult attainment is most consistently reported via the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS). Ochiltree County typically shows:
- A majority with a high school diploma or higher
- A smaller share with a bachelor’s degree or higher than Texas statewide (a common pattern in rural Panhandle counties)
For the most recent county estimates, reference the Census Bureau county profile tables (educational attainment) via data.census.gov (search “Ochiltree County, Texas educational attainment”).
Notable programs (STEM, vocational, AP)
- Career and Technical Education (CTE): Texas districts commonly operate CTE pathways aligned to regional labor markets (agriculture, mechanics, health sciences, business). District-specific program offerings are best confirmed in Perryton ISD curriculum/CTE documentation and TEA CTE reporting.
- Advanced coursework: Texas high schools frequently offer Advanced Placement (AP) and/or dual credit options; the definitive record of course participation and outcomes is reported in TAPR/Report Cards (district/campus advanced course enrollment and performance indicators).
- Workforce training (regional proxy): Panhandle-area workforce development and training programs are often coordinated through regional workforce boards and nearby community colleges; these serve as proxies for local postsecondary/workforce pipeline options where county-only program inventories are limited.
School safety measures and counseling resources
Texas public schools are governed by statewide safety and preparedness requirements (including emergency operations planning and training). District-level implementation details (campus procedures, safety staffing, anonymous reporting, counseling and mental health supports) are typically documented in local student handbooks, district safety plans, and annual notices. Statewide standards and frameworks are summarized through the TEA school safety resources (TEA School Safety).
Employment and Economic Conditions
Unemployment rate (most recent year available)
The most consistently cited official unemployment series at the county level is produced by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (LAUS) and distributed by state workforce agencies. For the latest annual average and recent monthly values for Ochiltree County, use:
- Texas Workforce Commission labor market data
- BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)
(County values are updated regularly; the most recent year available depends on the extraction date.)
Major industries and employment sectors
Ochiltree County’s industry mix is characteristic of the Texas Panhandle:
- Agriculture and agribusiness (including crop production, livestock, support activities)
- Oil and gas/energy and related field services (regional influence varies with commodity cycles)
- Manufacturing and construction (local and regional project-driven employment)
- Retail trade, health care, education, and public administration (core local-service employers centered in Perryton)
The most comparable industry composition shares for residents (where they work) are available from ACS “Industry by occupation” tables on data.census.gov for Ochiltree County.
Common occupations and workforce breakdown
Occupational distribution in rural Panhandle counties typically concentrates in:
- Management, business, and administrative support
- Service occupations (food service, protective services, personal care)
- Sales and office
- Construction and extraction
- Installation, maintenance, and repair
- Production and transportation/material moving
- Farming, fishing, and forestry (often higher than statewide shares)
The most recent county occupational shares are available via ACS occupation tables on data.census.gov.
Commuting patterns and mean commute time
Commuting in Ochiltree County typically reflects a rural pattern:
- A high share commuting by driving alone
- Limited public transit usage
- Commute times generally influenced by rural distances and employment concentration in Perryton and nearby counties
For the latest mean travel time to work and commuting mode shares, use ACS “Commuting (Journey to Work)” tables on data.census.gov.
Local employment versus out-of-county work
County residents often split between:
- Working within the county (Perryton-based employers, schools, health care, retail, county government, agriculture/energy)
- Out-of-county commuting to nearby Panhandle employment centers, reflecting the limited number of large employers typical of rural counties
The most standardized “in-county vs out-of-county” commuting and job flow measures are available from the Census Bureau’s LEHD/OnTheMap tools (OnTheMap), which report where residents work and where workers live.
Housing and Real Estate
Homeownership rate and rental share
Ochiltree County’s housing tenure is generally owner-dominated, consistent with rural Texas counties, with rentals concentrated in Perryton. The definitive homeownership and renter shares are reported in ACS “Tenure” tables on data.census.gov.
Median property values and recent trends
- Median home value: Best reported through ACS “Value (owner-occupied housing units)” estimates. Rural Panhandle counties often have median values below the Texas statewide median, with year-to-year changes influenced by local employment conditions and rebuilding cycles.
- Recent trends (proxy): Regional real estate trends in the Panhandle often show lower volatility than large metros, but can be affected by local events, construction costs, and energy-sector cycles. For a county-level time series, ACS 5-year estimates provide the most stable trend proxy (available on data.census.gov).
Typical rent prices
Typical rents are best represented by:
- Median gross rent (ACS), which includes contract rent plus estimated utilities. Rents in rural counties are typically lower than state metro averages, with limited inventory and a smaller apartment market. The latest median gross rent is available in ACS rent tables on data.census.gov.
Types of housing
Housing stock is predominantly:
- Single-family detached homes (especially in and around Perryton)
- Manufactured homes and rural properties/lots outside the city
- A smaller share of apartments and multi-unit rentals, generally concentrated near the city’s services and employment nodes
ACS “Units in structure” tables provide the most comparable breakdown by housing type (see data.census.gov).
Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools or amenities)
- Perryton concentrates the county’s schools, medical services, retail, and civic amenities, so neighborhoods within city limits generally provide shorter access to campuses and services.
- Unincorporated/rural areas tend to have larger lots and agricultural land uses with longer travel distances to schools and essential services.
Property tax overview (average rate and typical homeowner cost)
Property taxes in Texas are primarily levied by overlapping jurisdictions (county, school district, city, hospital and special districts where applicable). In Ochiltree County, the school district rate typically represents the largest share of the total tax rate.
- Tax rate (best source): Local consolidated tax rates are published by the county appraisal district and local taxing units; official rate histories and current-year rates are available through the Ochiltree County Appraisal District and county tax office postings (local sources vary in how they publish archival rates).
- Typical homeowner tax bill (proxy): A practical estimate combines the median home value (ACS) with the effective property tax rate reported for the county in ACS “Selected Housing Characteristics”/tax tables. The most comparable “median real estate taxes paid” metric is also available in ACS (owner-occupied units).
For county-level “median real estate taxes paid” and related housing-cost burdens, use ACS housing-cost tables on data.census.gov.
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Texas
- Anderson
- Andrews
- Angelina
- Aransas
- Archer
- Armstrong
- Atascosa
- Austin
- Bailey
- Bandera
- Bastrop
- Baylor
- Bee
- Bell
- Bexar
- Blanco
- Borden
- Bosque
- Bowie
- Brazoria
- Brazos
- Brewster
- Briscoe
- Brooks
- Brown
- Burleson
- Burnet
- Caldwell
- Calhoun
- Callahan
- Cameron
- Camp
- Carson
- Cass
- Castro
- Chambers
- Cherokee
- Childress
- Clay
- Cochran
- Coke
- Coleman
- Collin
- Collingsworth
- Colorado
- Comal
- Comanche
- Concho
- Cooke
- Coryell
- Cottle
- Crane
- Crockett
- Crosby
- Culberson
- Dallam
- Dallas
- Dawson
- De Witt
- Deaf Smith
- Delta
- Denton
- Dickens
- Dimmit
- Donley
- Duval
- Eastland
- Ector
- Edwards
- El Paso
- Ellis
- Erath
- Falls
- Fannin
- Fayette
- Fisher
- Floyd
- Foard
- Fort Bend
- Franklin
- Freestone
- Frio
- Gaines
- Galveston
- Garza
- Gillespie
- Glasscock
- Goliad
- Gonzales
- Gray
- Grayson
- Gregg
- Grimes
- Guadalupe
- Hale
- Hall
- Hamilton
- Hansford
- Hardeman
- Hardin
- Harris
- Harrison
- Hartley
- Haskell
- Hays
- Hemphill
- Henderson
- Hidalgo
- Hill
- Hockley
- Hood
- Hopkins
- Houston
- Howard
- Hudspeth
- Hunt
- Hutchinson
- Irion
- Jack
- Jackson
- Jasper
- Jeff Davis
- Jefferson
- Jim Hogg
- Jim Wells
- Johnson
- Jones
- Karnes
- Kaufman
- Kendall
- Kenedy
- Kent
- Kerr
- Kimble
- King
- Kinney
- Kleberg
- Knox
- La Salle
- Lamar
- Lamb
- Lampasas
- Lavaca
- Lee
- Leon
- Liberty
- Limestone
- Lipscomb
- Live Oak
- Llano
- Loving
- Lubbock
- Lynn
- Madison
- Marion
- Martin
- Mason
- Matagorda
- Maverick
- Mcculloch
- Mclennan
- Mcmullen
- Medina
- Menard
- Midland
- Milam
- Mills
- Mitchell
- Montague
- Montgomery
- Moore
- Morris
- Motley
- Nacogdoches
- Navarro
- Newton
- Nolan
- Nueces
- Oldham
- Orange
- Palo Pinto
- Panola
- Parker
- Parmer
- Pecos
- Polk
- Potter
- Presidio
- Rains
- Randall
- Reagan
- Real
- Red River
- Reeves
- Refugio
- Roberts
- Robertson
- Rockwall
- Runnels
- Rusk
- Sabine
- San Augustine
- San Jacinto
- San Patricio
- San Saba
- Schleicher
- Scurry
- Shackelford
- Shelby
- Sherman
- Smith
- Somervell
- Starr
- Stephens
- Sterling
- Stonewall
- Sutton
- Swisher
- Tarrant
- Taylor
- Terrell
- Terry
- Throckmorton
- Titus
- Tom Green
- Travis
- Trinity
- Tyler
- Upshur
- Upton
- Uvalde
- Val Verde
- Van Zandt
- Victoria
- Walker
- Waller
- Ward
- Washington
- Webb
- Wharton
- Wheeler
- Wichita
- Wilbarger
- Willacy
- Williamson
- Wilson
- Winkler
- Wise
- Wood
- Yoakum
- Young
- Zapata
- Zavala