Kiowa County is located in southwestern Oklahoma along the Texas border, part of the Southern Plains region. Established in 1901 and organized after the opening of former Kiowa-Comanche-Apache reservation lands to non-Indigenous settlement, it reflects the broader history of late territorial-era development in western Oklahoma. The county is small in population, with roughly 8,000 residents, and is characterized by low-density rural communities and an agricultural economy centered on cattle ranching and field crops. The landscape consists largely of open prairie and gently rolling plains shaped by tributaries of the Red River, with hot summers and variable rainfall typical of the region. Cultural and community life is rooted in small towns, local schools, and county-level institutions that serve a wide surrounding area. The county seat is Hobart, which functions as the primary administrative and service center.

Kiowa County Local Demographic Profile

Kiowa County is located in southwestern Oklahoma along the Texas border region, within the broader Great Plains. The county seat is Hobart, and the county is part of a primarily rural agricultural area of the state.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Kiowa County, Oklahoma, the county had a population of 8,335 (2020). The same source reports a population estimate of 8,074 (2023).

Age & Gender

Based on the U.S. Census Bureau’s data.census.gov profile tables for Kiowa County (ACS 5-year demographic profile), the population’s age structure is summarized across standard Census age bands (under 18, 18–64, and 65+), and sex is reported as counts and shares for male and female residents. County-level age distribution and sex breakdown are available from Census profile tables, but specific percentages vary by ACS release and table selection and should be taken directly from the selected Kiowa County profile table for the relevant year.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

The U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Kiowa County provides county-level shares for major race categories and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, including:

  • White
  • Black or African American
  • American Indian and Alaska Native
  • Asian
  • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
  • Two or more races
  • Hispanic or Latino (of any race)

Household Data

The U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts provides core household indicators for Kiowa County, including:

  • Number of households
  • Average household size
  • Persons per household
  • Owner-occupied housing unit rate
  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units (where available for the selected year range)
  • Median selected monthly owner costs (with mortgage / without mortgage) and gross rent (where reported)

Housing Data

County-level housing stock and occupancy characteristics are reported by the Census in both QuickFacts and detailed tables on data.census.gov, including:

  • Total housing units
  • Vacancy rate
  • Homeownership rate (owner-occupied vs. renter-occupied)
  • Structure type distribution (e.g., single-unit vs. multi-unit) in detailed ACS tables

Local Government Reference

For local government and planning resources, visit the Kiowa County official website (State of Oklahoma county portal).

Email Usage

Kiowa County, Oklahoma is a sparsely populated, rural county where longer distances between households and fewer competing providers can constrain last‑mile infrastructure and reduce everyday reliance on always‑on digital communication such as email.

Direct county-level email usage statistics are not generally published, so likely email adoption is summarized using proxies from the U.S. Census Bureau (data.census.gov), particularly American Community Survey indicators for internet subscription and device availability. Those indicators typically track with email access because most email use requires reliable home broadband or mobile data plus a computer or smartphone.

Age structure also influences email uptake: older median age and a larger share of seniors commonly correlate with lower adoption of new digital services and greater dependence on assistance for account setup and security practices, based on demographic profiles available through the American Community Survey.

Gender distribution is generally less predictive of email access than age and connectivity, but county sex ratios can be reviewed via Census QuickFacts.

Connectivity limitations in rural western Oklahoma—coverage gaps, limited fixed-line competition, and higher per-location buildout costs—remain key structural constraints on broadband subscription and, by extension, routine email use.

Mobile Phone Usage

Kiowa County is in southwestern Oklahoma along the Kansas border region of the Great Plains. It is predominantly rural, with small population centers (notably Hobart, the county seat) separated by large agricultural areas. The flat-to-gently rolling plains terrain generally supports wide-area radio propagation, but low population density and long distances between towers increase the cost of dense mobile infrastructure and can reduce in-building signal quality and mobile broadband performance outside towns.

Key distinction: network availability vs. adoption

Network availability refers to where mobile carriers report coverage (voice/LTE/5G) and where service can technically be used. Adoption refers to whether households and individuals actually subscribe to mobile service and use mobile internet. These measures can diverge in rural counties where coverage exists along highways and in towns but household subscription and consistent high-quality service lag.

Mobile penetration and access indicators (adoption)

County-specific “mobile penetration” figures are not typically published as a single, official metric. The most widely used adoption indicators for Kiowa County come from federal household surveys that measure whether homes have internet subscriptions and what type.

  • Household internet subscription and “cellular data plan only”: The U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) provides county-level estimates of internet subscription types, including households with cellular data plans and households with cellular data plan only (no wired subscription). These are the primary public indicators of mobile-only reliance at the county level. Source tables are available via the Census Bureau’s platforms, including data profiles and detailed tables for Kiowa County through the Census Bureau’s tools such as Census.gov data tables and the broader ACS program documentation at the American Community Survey (ACS).
  • Limitations: ACS results are estimates with margins of error and are not designed to measure carrier-level subscription counts or signal quality. They indicate household adoption and reliance on mobile data, not the technical footprint of coverage.

Mobile internet usage patterns (availability: 4G/LTE and 5G)

Public, map-based availability data for mobile broadband is primarily published through the FCC. For a county like Kiowa, availability is best summarized using FCC coverage datasets rather than anecdotal reports.

  • FCC reported mobile broadband coverage: The FCC’s Broadband Data Collection (BDC) provides carrier-reported coverage for mobile broadband and is the core federal source for availability maps. The national map can be used to examine coverage footprints within Kiowa County and distinguish between LTE and 5G where reported. See the FCC National Broadband Map.
  • 4G/LTE: LTE coverage is generally the baseline mobile broadband layer in rural Oklahoma counties. The FCC map and associated datasets are the authoritative public reference for where LTE is reported available in Kiowa County.
  • 5G: 5G availability in rural counties is often concentrated near towns, major roads, and corridors where carriers have upgraded equipment. The FCC map provides the most accessible public view of where 5G is reported available within the county. Countywide “5G presence” does not equate to uniform 5G performance, and reported availability does not guarantee indoor coverage.
  • Limitations: FCC availability reflects provider filings and modeled coverage, not measured speeds at every location. Availability does not directly measure congestion, indoor signal penetration, or consistency.

Actual household adoption versus mobile availability

Kiowa County can have substantial reported coverage while still showing lower rates of broadband subscription than urban counties, due to income distribution, age structure, and the economics of rural infrastructure.

  • Adoption metrics: ACS household subscription measures capture whether homes subscribe to internet and whether mobile data plans substitute for wired service. These measures distinguish mobile-only households from households with fixed broadband.
  • Why the distinction matters: A location can fall within an FCC-reported LTE/5G coverage area (availability) while still having lower household adoption because of affordability constraints, device limitations, limited plan data allowances, or inconsistent service quality that discourages reliance for home broadband.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

County-level device-type breakdowns (smartphone vs. feature phone, tablet-only, hotspot/router-only) are not consistently available in standard public datasets for a single rural county. Public sources provide partial proxies:

  • Smartphone prevalence (general context): National-level and state-level surveys commonly show smartphones as the dominant mobile access device, but those results are not specific enough to describe Kiowa County device composition without overstating precision.
  • County-level proxy indicators: ACS tables that identify cellular data plan subscriptions can indicate mobile broadband reliance but do not specify whether access occurs via smartphone, dedicated hotspot, or other cellular-enabled devices.
  • Limitations: Carrier subscriber counts and device mix are typically proprietary; publicly accessible county-level device-type distributions are limited.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity

Several measurable county characteristics and rural service realities affect both connectivity and adoption.

Rural settlement pattern and population density

  • Dispersed residences and long distances between towns raise per-user network buildout and maintenance costs, often translating into fewer tower sites and reduced redundancy. This can affect both availability granularity and the quality of mobile broadband away from population clusters.

Transportation corridors and town centers

  • Mobile upgrades and capacity are commonly prioritized along highways and within towns where usage is concentrated and backhaul is more accessible. In Kiowa County, this typically creates stronger service in and around Hobart and along major routes than in sparsely populated areas (availability patterns should be validated through FCC map layers rather than assumed at specific addresses).

Age structure, income, and affordability constraints

  • Rural counties often have older median ages and different income distributions than metropolitan areas, which can influence adoption of smartphones, data plans, and home broadband substitution patterns. The most appropriate public references for these county demographics are the Census Bureau’s profiles and tables accessed via Census.gov.

Fixed broadband alternatives and mobile substitution

  • Where fixed broadband options are limited or costly, some households rely on “cellular data plan only” for home internet. The prevalence of this substitution is measurable via ACS subscription categories (adoption), but it does not indicate whether service quality is sufficient for high-data uses.

Public data sources for Kiowa County (recommended references)

Data limitations specific to county-level mobile analysis

  • No single official “mobile penetration rate” is routinely published at the county level; household subscription measures (ACS) and provider-reported availability (FCC) are the main public proxies.
  • Device-type distributions (smartphone vs. feature phone vs. hotspot) are generally not published for a specific county in a consistent, public series.
  • Availability maps do not equal performance; they are best used to understand where service is reported to exist, not the typical user experience at every location.

Social Media Trends

Kiowa County is in southwestern Oklahoma on the Great Plains, with Hobart as the county seat and a largely rural settlement pattern. The local economy is shaped by agriculture, energy activity in the region, and public-sector services typical of small county hubs, factors that generally correlate with heavier reliance on mobile connectivity and mainstream social platforms for news, community updates, and commerce compared with locally produced media.

User statistics (penetration / active use)

  • Local (county-level) social media penetration: Publicly available, methodologically consistent social-media “active user” estimates are generally not published at the U.S. county level by major research organizations, and platform ad tools are not considered reliable for precise county measurement.
  • Best-available proxy (U.S. adult benchmarks):
  • Interpretation for Kiowa County: As a rural county, overall social media participation tends to track access constraints (broadband quality, mobile coverage) more than interest; usage often concentrates on mobile-first platforms and community-oriented networks. This aligns with national rural connectivity dynamics documented by the FCC and federal broadband programs, while direct county-specific social penetration remains undocumented in standard survey releases.

Age group trends

Based on Pew’s age-by-platform findings (U.S. adults, 2023), social media use is highest among younger adults and declines with age:

  • 18–29: highest overall usage and highest multi-platform usage.
  • 30–49: high usage, commonly balancing Facebook/Instagram with YouTube and messaging.
  • 50–64: moderate usage, with stronger tilt toward Facebook and YouTube.
  • 65+: lowest usage, typically concentrated on Facebook and YouTube. Source: Pew Research Center: Social Media Use in 2023.

Gender breakdown

  • Pew’s U.S. adult data generally shows small or platform-specific gender differences rather than a single large overall gap; differences are more pronounced by platform (e.g., women more likely to use Pinterest; men somewhat more represented on some discussion/video-centric platforms depending on the year).
  • County-specific gender-by-platform estimates are not available from standard public surveys; the most defensible summary for Kiowa County is that gender differences are expected to mirror national platform-specific patterns more than create a uniquely local profile. Source: Pew Research Center: Social Media Use in 2023.

Most-used platforms (percent using; U.S. adult benchmarks)

Pew Research Center (2023) reported the following shares of U.S. adults using each platform (usage, not necessarily “daily”):

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)

  • Community and local-information orientation: Rural counties commonly use Facebook pages/groups for school activities, churches, local government updates, and buy/sell exchanges; this matches Facebook’s continued reach among older and middle-aged adults nationally.
  • Video-led consumption: YouTube’s very high reach nationally supports heavy use for how-to content, local sports highlights, weather coverage, and entertainment; video is also a major discovery channel for services and products.
  • Short-form video growth among younger adults: TikTok and Instagram Reels usage is concentrated among younger adults; engagement tends to be higher-frequency and algorithm-driven rather than network-driven.
  • News exposure via social: Nationally, sizable shares of adults report getting news on social media, and platform choice affects what is encountered (for example, Facebook and YouTube play large roles in incidental news exposure). Source: Pew Research Center: Social Media and News fact sheet.
  • Messaging and coordination: In smaller communities, direct messaging (Facebook Messenger, Instagram DMs, SMS) often substitutes for public posting for event coordination and local commerce, while public posting concentrates around announcements, photos, and community issues.

Note on locality: The platform percentages above are the most reliable publicly available measures and are national adult benchmarks; no equivalently rigorous, publicly released dataset provides consistent platform-usage percentages specifically for Kiowa County.

Family & Associates Records

Kiowa County, Oklahoma family and associate-related public records include vital records, court records, and recorded property instruments. Birth and death certificates for Kiowa County events are state-maintained by the Oklahoma State Department of Health (OSDH) Vital Records Service; county offices typically do not issue certified birth/death records. Marriage licenses are issued and recorded by the Kiowa County Court Clerk, and divorces, guardianships, probate, and some adoption case filings are maintained as court records through the Court Clerk (case access varies by record type and confidentiality). Real property records that can document family relationships (deeds, mortgages, releases) are recorded by the Kiowa County Clerk.

Public database access is primarily provided through the Oklahoma State Courts Network (OSCN) for many district court dockets and registers of actions: OSCN Case Search. OSDH provides ordering information for certified vital records: OSDH Birth and Death Certificates.

In-person access generally occurs at the Court Clerk (court case files and marriage records) and County Clerk (land records) during business hours at the county courthouse; online access is limited to the specific systems above. Privacy restrictions apply to adoption proceedings and many juvenile/guardianship matters (often sealed or limited-access), and certified vital records are restricted by state law to eligible requesters.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

  • Marriage records (licenses and returns/certificates)

    • Marriage license application and marriage license issued by the county court clerk.
    • Marriage return/certificate (proof the ceremony occurred), typically completed by the officiant and filed back with the court clerk.

  • Divorce records

    • Divorce case file maintained by the district court, which may include the petition, summons, proof of service, motions, orders, settlement agreements, child custody/support orders, and the final decree of divorce.
    • Divorce decree (final judgment) as a specific document within the case file.

  • Annulment records

    • Annulments are handled as district court civil cases and are maintained similarly to divorce case files, with a final order/decree of annulment where granted.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

  • Marriage records

    • Filed with: Kiowa County Court Clerk (county-level filing for marriage licenses and returns).
    • Access methods: In-person requests at the court clerk’s office are the standard method. Some counties provide limited remote access or indexes, but official certified copies are typically issued by the court clerk.

  • Divorce and annulment records

    • Filed with: Kiowa County District Court, with records maintained by the Kiowa County Court Clerk as clerk of the district court.
    • Access methods:
      • In-person inspection of case files and requests for copies through the court clerk (public access governed by court rules and privacy restrictions).
      • Statewide online docket access (OSCN): Many Oklahoma district court case dockets and some document images are available through the Oklahoma State Courts Network (OSCN), though coverage and document availability can vary by county and by case type. Link: https://oscn.net/
      • Certified copies of final decrees/orders are obtained from the court clerk.

  • State-level vital records (verification copies)

Typical information included in these records

  • Marriage license and return

    • Full names of both parties (including prior names in some applications)
    • Date and place of marriage
    • Ages and/or dates of birth (varies by form and era)
    • Residences/addresses at time of application (often included historically)
    • Names of parents or other identifying details (varies by form and period)
    • Officiant name/title and signature
    • Witness names (when required/recorded)
    • License number, issuance date, and filing date of the return

  • Divorce decree and case file

    • Names of parties and case number
    • Date of filing and date of decree
    • Grounds or legal basis for divorce (may appear in pleadings; decrees may be more limited)
    • Court findings and orders regarding:
      • Property and debt division
      • Spousal support (alimony), when ordered
      • Child custody, visitation, and child support, when applicable
      • Name restoration (when ordered)
    • Attorney information and service/notice records (in the case file)

  • Annulment order and case file

    • Names of parties and case number
    • Alleged basis for annulment and court findings
    • Final order granting or denying annulment
    • Any related orders on children, support, or property, when applicable

Privacy or legal restrictions

  • Public access baseline

    • Marriage records filed with the county court clerk are generally treated as public records, subject to lawful limits on disclosure of specific sensitive identifiers.
    • Divorce and annulment dockets and many filings are generally public court records, but access is limited for information protected by law or court rule.

  • Common restrictions and redactions

    • Confidential or sealed records: Courts can seal all or part of a case file by order. Sealed materials are not publicly accessible except as authorized by the court.
    • Protected personal information: Social Security numbers, full dates of birth, minor children’s identifying information, and certain financial account information are commonly restricted and may be redacted from publicly available copies under court rules and privacy practices.
    • Cases involving minors or sensitive subject matter: Adoption-related matters, guardianships, and some juvenile-related proceedings are confidential by statute; these restrictions can also affect related filings that appear in domestic cases.
    • Certified copies and identity controls: Agencies may require requestor identification and limit the form of issued copies for certain vital-record products (such as state-level verifications), even when the underlying court record is public.

  • Legal framework

    • Access to court records and confidential information in Oklahoma is governed by state statutes, court rules, and specific judicial orders in individual cases.

Education, Employment and Housing

Kiowa County is in southwestern Oklahoma along the Texas border, with Hobart as the county seat and the largest population center. It is a sparsely populated, primarily rural county with small-town service hubs and an economy historically tied to agriculture, local government, and regional trade and services. (For baseline county profiles and time-series indicators, see the U.S. Census Bureau’s data portal and the Oklahoma Office of Workforce Development (OKJobMatch/LMI) ecosystem.)

Education Indicators

Public schools (counts and names)

Kiowa County’s public K–12 education is primarily served by the county’s independent school districts. Commonly referenced public school systems serving the county include:

  • Hobart Public Schools (Hobart)
  • Mountain View–Gotebo Public Schools (serving communities including Mountain View and Gotebo)
  • Roosevelt Public Schools (Roosevelt area)

A consolidated, school-by-school list (elementary/middle/high campus names) varies by district reporting and year; the most consistent directory-level source is the Oklahoma State Department of Education (OSDE) district/school directories and profiles.

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratios: District-level student–teacher ratios in rural Oklahoma counties typically fall in the low-to-mid teens (students per teacher). For Kiowa County, the most defensible, current ratios are those published in OSDE district report cards and federal school-level files rather than county averages (countywide ratios are not always published as a single official figure).
  • Graduation rates: Oklahoma reports 4-year adjusted cohort graduation rates at the high school and district level through OSDE. Kiowa County’s high school graduation rates are best cited from the relevant district/school report cards because the state does not consistently publish a single countywide graduation rate that cleanly aggregates multiple districts.

Authoritative district/school metrics are available via OSDE report cards and accountability pages: OSDE school and district data.

Adult educational attainment

Adult educational attainment is most commonly sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates (county level). The standard indicators reported include:

  • High school diploma or higher (age 25+)
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher (age 25+)

Kiowa County generally tracks below Oklahoma and U.S. averages for bachelor’s degree attainment, consistent with many rural counties in the region. The most recent official percentages should be taken from the county table in the ACS 5-year dataset via data.census.gov (Educational Attainment table).

Notable programs (STEM, vocational training, AP)

  • Career and technical education (CTE): Kiowa County students commonly access vocational pathways through Oklahoma’s statewide technology center system, which provides programs such as health careers, skilled trades, and applied technology. Regional service is typically coordinated through a nearby technology center rather than a county-specific institution; official program maps and offerings are maintained by Oklahoma CareerTech.
  • Advanced coursework (AP/dual credit): Advanced Placement (AP) and dual-credit availability is district- and high-school-specific in rural counties and is best verified through OSDE report cards and district course catalogs rather than county summaries.

School safety measures and counseling resources

Oklahoma public schools commonly report safety and student support resources through district policy documents and OSDE reporting channels. Typical measures include:

  • Controlled building access, visitor sign-in procedures, and coordination with local law enforcement/SRO arrangements (where funded)
  • Emergency operations planning and required drills
  • Student counseling services provided through school counselors; behavioral health supports may also be delivered through regional providers and school-based referrals

The existence, staffing levels, and scope of counseling and mental health supports vary by district and are most accurately described in district staffing plans and OSDE school profiles rather than county aggregates.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year available)

Kiowa County unemployment is reported monthly and annually through the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (LAUS) and Oklahoma labor market information programs. The most current county unemployment rates are available via:

Kiowa County typically experiences unemployment rates that move with statewide cycles, with noticeable sensitivity to seasonal and regional employment patterns. (A single definitive figure should be taken directly from the latest LAUS annual average or most recent month.)

Major industries and employment sectors

The county’s employment base is characteristic of rural southwestern Oklahoma, with major sectors generally including:

  • Public administration and education/health services (schools, county/municipal services, clinics)
  • Retail trade and accommodation/food services (local-serving businesses in Hobart and smaller communities)
  • Agriculture and related support activities (farm operations and agribusiness services)
  • Construction and transportation/warehousing (smaller scale; often tied to regional demand)
  • Manufacturing is typically present at smaller scale in many rural counties, varying by specific local employers.

For sector employment distributions, the most consistent official sources are the ACS industry/occupation tables and state LMI products.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

Occupational patterns in Kiowa County align with a rural service-center workforce mix, commonly including:

  • Management and office/administrative support
  • Sales and related occupations
  • Transportation and material moving
  • Construction and extraction
  • Education, healthcare support, and protective service
  • Production and maintenance/repair

The authoritative occupational breakdown is published in ACS occupation tables for Kiowa County at data.census.gov.

Commuting patterns and mean commute times

  • Commuting mode: Rural counties generally show a strong reliance on driving alone and limited public transit availability.
  • Mean travel time to work: The mean commute time is typically below large-metro averages but can vary widely depending on out-of-county commuting to regional job centers. The official mean commute time for Kiowa County is reported in the ACS “Travel Time to Work” tables at data.census.gov.

Local employment vs. out-of-county work

Kiowa County commonly has a share of residents commuting to jobs outside the county, reflecting limited local employer scale and the draw of larger regional labor markets. The most direct measure comes from U.S. Census commuting/flows products; a standard reference point is the LEHD OnTheMap commuting flows tool, which shows inflow/outflow patterns for workers by home and workplace geography.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership rate and rental share

Kiowa County’s housing tenure is typical of rural Oklahoma counties, with homeownership comprising a clear majority of occupied units and a smaller rental market concentrated near the county’s main towns. Official homeownership and rental shares are reported in ACS housing tenure tables via data.census.gov.

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median home value: The county’s median owner-occupied home value is published in ACS “Value” tables. Kiowa County typically reports lower median home values than Oklahoma and U.S. medians, reflecting rural land markets, housing age profiles, and local income levels.
  • Trends: Recent years across Oklahoma have generally shown price increases from the late 2010s into the early 2020s, with rural counties often seeing more moderate growth and thinner sales volume than metros. County-specific trend lines are best supported by ACS time series and, where available, assessed value trends from the county assessor.

Typical rent prices

  • Median gross rent is available from ACS and generally trends below metro-area rents in rural southwestern Oklahoma. Rental supply is typically limited, with rents influenced by small inventory and the condition/age of units.

Types of housing

Housing stock in Kiowa County is predominantly:

  • Single-family detached homes in Hobart and other incorporated areas
  • Manufactured homes and rural homesteads/acreage properties outside town limits
  • Small multifamily properties (duplexes/small apartment buildings) present but limited compared with urban counties

These patterns are consistent with ACS housing structure type distributions.

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools or amenities)

  • In Hobart, proximity to schools, the downtown corridor, and civic services (county offices, parks, local retail) tends to define neighborhood convenience.
  • Outside Hobart, neighborhoods are more dispersed, and access to amenities is typically organized around small-town centers and highway corridors.

Because Kiowa County is geographically large relative to its population, drive times to schools and services can be a significant part of daily routines for rural households.

Property tax overview (rate and typical homeowner cost)

  • Property tax structure: Oklahoma property taxes are assessed on a percentage of market value and then taxed by local millage rates that fund schools, county services, and other local jurisdictions. Kiowa County’s effective property tax burden typically reflects Oklahoma’s generally moderate property tax levels relative to many states, but varies by school district and local levies.
  • Typical homeowner cost: The most defensible “typical” annual property tax amounts at the county level are reported as median real estate taxes paid in the ACS. County assessor and treasurer offices provide levy and billing information; statewide explanatory material is available through the Oklahoma Tax Commission and county offices.

Data availability note: Several indicators requested (student–teacher ratios and graduation rates, school safety/counseling staffing) are published most reliably at the district or school level, not as a single countywide statistic. The most current, official values are therefore best taken from OSDE district/school report cards and directories rather than county aggregates.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Oklahoma