Delaware County Local Demographic Profile

Which data vintage do you prefer for Delaware County, OK?

  • 2020 Decennial Census (official counts)
  • 2019–2023 ACS 5-year estimates (most current, but estimates)

I can provide both side-by-side if you’d like. Also confirm if you want household details such as total households, average household size, family vs. nonfamily share, and households with children.

Email Usage in Delaware County

Here’s a practical, data-informed snapshot for Delaware County, Oklahoma (pop. ~43k; low density ~50–60 people/sq. mi.):

  • Estimated email users: ~31k–34k residents.
  • By age (share of email users; estimates based on national adoption by age and local age mix):
    • 13–17: ~7%
    • 18–34: ~22%
    • 35–64: ~44%
    • 65+: ~27%
  • Gender split among email users: roughly mirrors population (about 51% female, 49% male).
  • Digital access and trends:
    • Household broadband subscription rate: roughly 70–75% (lower than U.S. average, reflecting rural profile).
    • Smartphone‑only internet households: ~15–20%; fixed‑wireless is common outside towns.
    • Better wired options (cable/fiber) cluster around Grove and Jay and along major corridors (e.g., US‑59/OK‑10); coverage becomes spottier in rural hollows and peninsulas around Grand Lake.
    • Ongoing state/federal broadband investments (e.g., recent fiber expansions via grant programs) are improving coverage, but some unserved/underserved pockets remain.
  • Takeaway: Email usage is widespread and skews slightly older than the U.S. average due to the county’s older age profile; connectivity constraints are primarily location-based rather than demographic.

Mobile Phone Usage in Delaware County

Below is a concise, planning-oriented snapshot. Figures are estimates based on 2020–2024 Census/ACS patterns, FCC maps, and national tech-adoption surveys applied to local context.

Overview

  • Population baseline: ~43,000 (Delaware County, OK). Older and more rural than Oklahoma overall; sizeable American Indian population (Cherokee Nation reservation area), lake tourism seasonal swings (Grove/Grand Lake).

User estimates (mobile ownership and usage)

  • Adults with a mobile phone: ~27,000–30,000 (about 80–85% of adults; slightly below statewide).
  • Smartphone users: ~24,000–26,500 (roughly 75–80% of adults; OK statewide is closer to 80–85%).
  • Mobile-only internet households (primarily/only cellular for home access): 28–35% (higher than Oklahoma’s ~22–25%), driven by patchy cable/fiber outside towns.
  • Prepaid vs. postpaid: Prepaid likely 45–55% of lines (above statewide ~35–40%), reflecting income mix and Tribal Lifeline enrollment.
  • Platform mix: Android skew (≈65–70% of smartphones vs. Oklahoma ≈58–62%), tied to price sensitivity and prepaid usage.
  • Device turnover: Longer replacement cycle (often 3–4 years vs. statewide ~2.5–3), with more refurbished/entry-tier models in circulation.

Demographic patterns that shape usage

  • Age: 65+ share is elevated (~22–24%). Seniors show lower smartphone adoption (roughly mid‑60s percent), but increasing. Feature-phone and basic LTE handset usage remains more visible than state average.
  • American Indian/Alaska Native residents: Substantially above state average (including multiracial). Adoption rates are near county average, but with:
    • Higher reliance on ACP/Lifeline (including enhanced Tribal benefits).
    • Greater use of prepaid/MVNO providers that support government-subsidized plans.
  • Hispanic population (small but growing, ~5–6%): Younger profile; higher mobile-only internet reliance and heavy messaging/app-based communication.
  • Income/education: Lower median income and longer commutes in rural tracts correlate with fewer fixed broadband options and higher smartphone-only reliance.

Digital infrastructure and coverage

  • Cellular coverage
    • AT&T and Verizon: Solid along main corridors (US‑59, OK‑10, SH‑20, around Grove/Jay), with low‑band 5G widely present; indoor coverage can fall off in hilly/wooded areas and around lake coves.
    • T‑Mobile: Strong relative presence due to mid‑band 2.5 GHz 5G covering Grove/Jay and many in‑between stretches; often the fastest option in town areas, but still rural gaps.
    • High-band/mmWave: Effectively absent; C‑band (AT&T/Verizon) is limited and mostly near population centers, not broadly countywide.
    • Notable weak spots: Eastern border hills/valleys and scattered lake peninsulas; frequent need for Wi‑Fi calling or boosters in metal buildings and marinas.
  • Backhaul and tower density
    • Fewer macro sites per square mile than state average outside towns; co‑locations on ridge lines/water towers are common.
    • Mix of fiber and microwave backhaul; some sites remain microwave-fed and congest during summer weekends.
  • Fixed broadband context (affects mobile reliance)
    • Fiber pockets from local providers/co-ops (e.g., Bolt Fiber/NOEC; Grand Telephone) and cable in Grove (e.g., Vyve) contrast with long copper/DSL runs in rural tracts.
    • This patchwork drives higher smartphone hotspot use and home LTE/5G gateways than state average.
  • Public safety and resilience
    • FirstNet (AT&T) coverage is good on main routes; volunteer departments and clinics often use in‑building boosters.
    • Storm/ice events can impact microwave-fed sites; primary towers have generators, but smaller sites may not.
  • Public Wi‑Fi anchors
    • Libraries (Grove, Jay, Kansas), Cherokee Nation clinics/community centers, and schools provide important offload points.

How Delaware County differs from the Oklahoma state picture

  • Adoption level: Slightly lower overall smartphone penetration but higher dependence on mobile as primary home internet.
  • Plan mix: Noticeably higher prepaid/Lifeline/ACP participation and Android share.
  • Network profile: T‑Mobile mid‑band 5G is often the top rural performer; AT&T/Verizon C‑band is less prevalent than in urban Oklahoma. More coverage shadowing from terrain and lake geography.
  • Infrastructure model: Greater role for electric/telephone co‑ops and small telcos in delivering fiber; cable footprint is limited outside Grove. This uneven fixed landscape elevates demand for cellular hotspots and fixed wireless.
  • Seasonal load: Summer lake tourism creates atypical peak congestion compared with most Oklahoma counties.

Notes and confidence

  • Figures are directional estimates for planning, not regulatory reporting. For precision (e.g., by census tract), combine latest FCC Broadband maps, carrier coverage tools, and ACS microdata, plus on-the-ground drive tests around US‑59/OK‑10 corridors and lake peninsulas.

Social Media Trends in Delaware County

Below is a concise, locality‑focused snapshot. Figures are best‑estimate ranges for Delaware County adults, extrapolated from recent Pew Research and rural/Oklahoma patterns; use them directionally.

Quick user snapshot

  • Population: roughly 42–44k residents.
  • Estimated social media users (13+): about 26k–30k (≈65–72% of residents).
  • Adult users (18+): about 24k–28k.

Most‑used platforms (share of adults using each at least monthly)

  • YouTube: 75–80%
  • Facebook: 65–72%
  • Instagram: 30–38%
  • TikTok: 25–32%
  • Snapchat: 22–28% (heavily under 30)
  • Pinterest: 25–32% (skews female)
  • X/Twitter: 15–20%
  • Reddit: 12–16%
  • Nextdoor: 5–10% (many rely on Facebook Groups instead)

Age split (share of each group using social media)

  • 13–17: 90–95% (Snapchat/TikTok/YouTube first; Instagram rising; Facebook mostly for groups/announcements)
  • 18–29: 90–95% (Instagram/TikTok/Snapchat; Facebook for events/Marketplace)
  • 30–49: 80–88% (Facebook and YouTube dominant; Instagram and TikTok growing; Pinterest common)
  • 50–64: 68–78% (Facebook/YouTube core; some Pinterest/TikTok)
  • 65+: 50–60% (Facebook/YouTube; Messenger for family)

Gender profile

  • Overall users: ~52–55% female.
  • Platform skews: Pinterest and Facebook slightly female; Instagram slightly female; YouTube, Reddit, and X slightly male.

Behavioral trends to know

  • Community-first usage: Heavy reliance on Facebook Groups for local news, school updates (Grove, Jay, Colcord, Kansas), church bulletins, lost-and-found, and county services (sheriff/emergency management).
  • Marketplace culture: Facebook Marketplace is a top local utility for vehicles, boats, farm/ranch gear, household items, lake-home rentals.
  • Weather and safety: Spikes around severe weather, lake conditions, road closures, and power updates; YouTube/Facebook live streams from local media are popular.
  • Grand Lake seasonality: More posting and short-form video in spring–summer (fishing tournaments, boating, events); quieter but still active around fall sports and holidays.
  • Short-form video growth: Reels/TikTok usage rising across 18–49; local businesses increasingly post vertical video for specials and events.
  • Messaging habits: Facebook Messenger common across ages; Snapchat the default for teens/young adults.
  • Trust patterns: People prioritize info from known locals, admins, schools, churches, and county pages; rumor correction often happens inside moderated Facebook Groups.
  • Posting vs. lurking: Majority are consumers/sharers; a smaller set of admins, coaches, pastors, and small-business owners drive most original local content.

Note: Specific county-level platform counts aren’t directly published; figures above are modeled from national/rural usage patterns and Oklahoma demographics.