Jefferson County Local Demographic Profile
Key demographics for Jefferson County, Tennessee (latest available):
- Population (2023 estimate): ~57,200
- Age:
- Median age: ~43
- Under 18: ~21%
- 18–64: ~60%
- 65 and over: ~19%
- Gender:
- Female: ~50.8%
- Male: ~49.2%
- Race/ethnicity (Hispanic can be of any race):
- White (non-Hispanic): ~87%
- Hispanic/Latino: ~6%
- Black/African American (non-Hispanic): ~3%
- Two or more races (non-Hispanic): ~2%
- Asian (non-Hispanic): ~1%
- American Indian/Alaska Native and other: <1%
- Households:
- Total households: ~22,000
- Average household size: ~2.5
- Family households: ~69% of households
- Housing tenure: ~76% owner-occupied, ~24% renter-occupied
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program (2023) and American Community Survey 2019–2023 5-year estimates. Figures rounded; ACS estimates include sampling error.
Email Usage in Jefferson County
Jefferson County, TN snapshot
- Population and density: ~58,500 residents; land ≈274 sq mi; ~213 people/sq mi.
- Estimated email users: ~42,000 adults (assumes ~78% of residents are 18+ and ~92% of U.S. adults use email).
- Age distribution of email users (approximate counts):
- 18–29: ~8,000 (19%)
- 30–49: ~13,900 (33%)
- 50–64: ~10,900 (26%)
- 65+: ~9,200 (22%)
- Gender split among email users: 51% female (21,400) and 49% male (20,600), mirroring the county’s population balance.
- Digital access and connectivity:
- ~81% of households subscribe to broadband; ~90% have a computer; ~12% are smartphone‑only internet households.
- Broadband is strongest in Jefferson City, Dandridge, and along the I‑40/I‑81 corridor; rural and lakeshore areas rely more on cellular/fixed‑wireless.
- Adoption continues to rise, with fiber expanding in pockets but not countywide; seniors’ adoption trails younger adults, shaping usage patterns.
Insights: Email penetration is effectively mainstream across working‑age adults, with a sizeable and growing 65+ user base. Coverage concentration along transport corridors and moderate population density support robust access, while smartphone‑only households signal ongoing reliance on mobile connectivity.
Mobile Phone Usage in Jefferson County
Jefferson County, Tennessee — mobile phone usage summary (focus on how it differs from statewide patterns)
Headline usage estimates (2023–2024, modeled from ACS S2801 5‑year county data, TN state benchmarks, and Pew adoption rates):
- Estimated adult smartphone users: ~38,000–39,000 (about 85% of ~44,500 adults), plus ~3,500 teen users (ages 13–17), yielding roughly 41,000–42,000 residents age 13+ with smartphones.
- Households with a smartphone: ~20,200 (about 90% of ~22,500 households).
- Households with a cellular data plan: ~18,200 (≈81%).
- Cellular-only internet households (rely on smartphone/hotspot; no fixed broadband): ~3,300–3,500 (≈15%).
- Households with no home internet subscription of any kind: ~4,000 (≈18%).
How Jefferson County differs from Tennessee overall
- Cellular-only reliance is higher: ~15% of households in Jefferson County vs ~12% statewide. The county leans more on mobile data as a primary home connection.
- Smartphone presence at the household level is slightly lower: ~90% vs ~92% statewide, reflecting an older age profile and more rural settlement.
- Fixed broadband take-up is a bit weaker, and mobile networks shoulder more of the everyday connectivity load than in metro/suburban Tennessee.
- Off-corridor mobile performance and reliability lag the state average due to terrain and a sparser tower grid; peak speeds on interstates are competitive, but valley/lakeshore coverage is patchier.
Demographic breakdown (usage patterns and implications)
- Age:
- 18–34: very high smartphone adoption (≈95%+), in line with state norms.
- 35–64: high adoption (≈90%), slightly below urban Tennessee.
- 65+: lower adoption (≈65–70%) than the state average for seniors, contributing to the county’s marginally lower overall smartphone saturation. Seniors who do adopt are more likely to be cellular-only for home access than seniors in metro TN.
- Income:
- Lower-income households are over-represented compared with the state average and are more likely to be cellular-only. Expect a larger share using prepaid/MVNO plans and prioritizing data-efficient apps.
- Race/ethnicity:
- The county is majority White non-Hispanic, with smaller Black and Hispanic communities than the state average. Device ownership rates across groups are broadly similar, but cellular-only reliance tends to be highest among lower-income households regardless of race/ethnicity.
- Geography within the county:
- Towns (Jefferson City, Dandridge, White Pine, New Market) show near-statewide adoption patterns.
- Outlying and lakeshore areas display higher cellular-only reliance and more coverage variability, especially indoors and in hollows.
Digital infrastructure points
- Carrier footprint:
- AT&T, Verizon, and T‑Mobile all provide LTE countywide. 5G coverage is strongest along I‑40/I‑81 and in/around Jefferson City, Dandridge, and White Pine. Verizon’s 5G coverage is more corridor-centric; AT&T and T‑Mobile show broader 5G along major roads and town centers.
- Performance:
- On-corridor outdoor speeds are typically strong and competitive with statewide medians; off-corridor rural areas commonly see lower throughputs and more variability, especially indoors. This performance gap relative to state averages is more pronounced than in suburban counties.
- Terrain effects:
- The Appalachian foothills and the shorelines of Douglas and Cherokee Lakes create signal shadowing and small dead zones, increasing network variability versus flatter Tennessee counties.
- Public safety and institutions:
- AT&T FirstNet serves public safety. Schools and libraries provide important Wi‑Fi offload; this offloading role is more critical locally because cellular-only households are more common.
- Near-term outlook:
- Ongoing fiber and fixed wireless builds (funded by state and federal broadband programs) are expected to reduce cellular-only reliance by mid‑decade, but mobile will remain a primary access path for a sizable minority, especially in outlying areas.
Key takeaways for planning and outreach
- Plan for a higher share of cellular-only users than the Tennessee average; optimize services for variable bandwidth and indoor coverage challenges.
- SMS and lightweight app experiences matter more here than in urban Tennessee; offline-capable features help.
- Engagement that leans on 5G-dependent experiences will perform best along the I‑40/I‑81 corridor and in town centers; provide fallbacks for rural users.
Social Media Trends in Jefferson County
Social media usage in Jefferson County, Tennessee — 2025 snapshot
Definitive local demographics (U.S. Census Bureau, 2020):
- Population: 54,683
- Gender: 51% female, 49% male
- Community profile: Largely suburban–rural with an older-than-U.S.-average age mix (skew toward 45+)
Estimated platform penetration among adults in Jefferson County (Method: Applied Pew Research Center 2024 U.S. adoption rates, adjusted for the county’s older age profile and suburban–rural setting; use as best-available local estimates.)
- Facebook: 70%
- YouTube: 80%
- Instagram: 42%
- TikTok: 28%
- Snapchat: 22%
- Pinterest: 36% (notably higher among women)
- WhatsApp: 23%
- X (Twitter): 24%
- Reddit: 18%
- Nextdoor: 14%
Age-group usage patterns (localized from national behavior)
- 13–24: High on Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat; Facebook used mainly for groups/events and family. Short-form video (Reels/TikTok) dominates.
- 25–44: Heavy on Facebook (Groups/Marketplace), YouTube (DIY, reviews), Instagram (Reels). TikTok moderate, often for entertainment and local recommendations.
- 45–64: Facebook is the hub (community groups, churches, schools, youth sports, Marketplace). YouTube strong for how-to, local news clips. Pinterest active among women.
- 65+: Facebook for community and family updates; YouTube for tutorials, faith content, and news recaps. Lower adoption of Instagram/TikTok but growing via Reels cross-posts.
Gender notes
- Women: Higher likelihood of Facebook Group engagement and Pinterest; strong participation in community/parent groups, church networks, local events.
- Men: Strong YouTube usage (DIY, automotive/outdoors), higher-than-average Reddit among tech/hobby segments; Facebook for local news and Marketplace.
Most-used platforms (ranked, estimated adult share)
- YouTube (80%)
- Facebook (70%)
- Instagram (42%)
- Pinterest (36%)
- TikTok (28%)
- X/Twitter (24%)
- WhatsApp (23%)
- Snapchat (22%)
- Reddit (18%)
- Nextdoor (14%)
Behavioral trends observed in counties like Jefferson (applies locally)
- Community-first Facebook behavior: Very high engagement in local Groups (schools, churches, youth sports, festivals, yard sales). Marketplace is a top driver of daily opens.
- Video is king: YouTube for “how-to” and product research; short-form video (Reels/TikTok) increasingly cross-posted by local businesses for reach.
- Local news and alerts: Weather, road closures, school announcements, and high-school sports drive spikes in engagement, often via Facebook shares.
- Event discovery and attendance: Fairs, seasonal festivals, and charity events are promoted and discovered via Facebook Events and group posts.
- Messaging: Facebook Messenger is the default; Snapchat dominates teen peer messaging; WhatsApp adoption is lower than national average but used within certain communities and for small-business customer comms.
- Shopping and recommendations: Marketplace plus “ISO” (in search of) posts in groups; short-form video product demos influence impulse buys. Review-seeking happens on Facebook comments and YouTube.
- Posting cadence: Evenings (7–10 p.m.) and weekends see peak local interactions; weekday mornings used for news/alerts.
Notes on sources and method
- Demographics: U.S. Census Bureau (Jefferson County, TN, 2020 Census) for population and gender.
- Platform usage: Pew Research Center Social Media Use (2024). County percentages are modeled estimates derived from national adoption rates adjusted for Jefferson County’s older age mix and suburban–rural characteristics.
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Tennessee
- Anderson
- Bedford
- Benton
- Bledsoe
- Blount
- Bradley
- Campbell
- Cannon
- Carroll
- Carter
- Cheatham
- Chester
- Claiborne
- Clay
- Cocke
- Coffee
- Crockett
- Cumberland
- Davidson
- Decatur
- Dekalb
- Dickson
- Dyer
- Fayette
- Fentress
- Franklin
- Gibson
- Giles
- Grainger
- Greene
- Grundy
- Hamblen
- Hamilton
- Hancock
- Hardeman
- Hardin
- Hawkins
- Haywood
- Henderson
- Henry
- Hickman
- Houston
- Humphreys
- Jackson
- Johnson
- Knox
- Lake
- Lauderdale
- Lawrence
- Lewis
- Lincoln
- Loudon
- Macon
- Madison
- Marion
- Marshall
- Maury
- Mcminn
- Mcnairy
- Meigs
- Monroe
- Montgomery
- Moore
- Morgan
- Obion
- Overton
- Perry
- Pickett
- Polk
- Putnam
- Rhea
- Roane
- Robertson
- Rutherford
- Scott
- Sequatchie
- Sevier
- Shelby
- Smith
- Stewart
- Sullivan
- Sumner
- Tipton
- Trousdale
- Unicoi
- Union
- Van Buren
- Warren
- Washington
- Wayne
- Weakley
- White
- Williamson
- Wilson