Dekalb County Local Demographic Profile

Here are concise, recent (Census/ACS) snapshots for DeKalb County, Tennessee:

Population

  • 20,080 (2020 Decennial Census)

Age

  • Median age: about 42 years (ACS 2018–2022)
  • Under 18: about 22–23%
  • 65 and over: about 18–19%

Gender

  • Female: about 50%

Race and Hispanic origin (2020 Census unless noted)

  • White alone: about 88–90%
  • Black or African American alone: about 1–2%
  • Asian alone: ~0.5%
  • American Indian/Alaska Native: ~0.3–0.5%
  • Two or more races: about 6–9%
  • Hispanic or Latino (any race): about 7–9%

Households (ACS 2018–2022)

  • Total households: about 8,000
  • Average household size: about 2.5
  • Family households: about two-thirds of all households
  • Married-couple families: roughly half of households
  • Households with children under 18: roughly one-quarter to one-third

Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Decennial Census; American Community Survey 2018–2022 5-year estimates.

Email Usage in Dekalb County

Dekalb County, TN snapshot (estimates)

  • Users: ≈21,000 residents; ≈16,300 adults. Applying national email adoption to local internet use yields about 13,500–15,000 adult email users; total residents with email ≈14,000–16,000.
  • Age distribution of email users: 18–29: 15–18%; 30–49: 32–35%; 50–64: 26–28%; 65+: 20–23%. Usage is near-universal for ages 30–64 (95%+), high for 18–29 (90–95%), and somewhat lower for 65+ (~75–85%).
  • Gender split: Roughly even; about 51% female, 49% male among users (mirrors local population).
  • Digital access trends: About 65–75% of households have a fixed broadband subscription; 15–20% are smartphone-only internet users (higher in rural blocks). Email is commonly checked on smartphones; work/school accounts drive daily use. Public Wi‑Fi (libraries/schools) supplements access for some households.
  • Density/connectivity: Population density ≈60 people per sq. mile. Dispersed housing and hilly terrain around Center Hill Lake increase last‑mile costs and leave pockets reliant on LTE/fixed‑wireless. Wired options are strongest in town centers (e.g., Smithville, Alexandria), with more variability in outlying areas.

Notes: Figures derive from ACS/state benchmarks and national email adoption rates applied to local population; treat as directional estimates.

Mobile Phone Usage in Dekalb County

Below is a pragmatic snapshot of mobile phone usage in DeKalb County, TN, with county-level estimates, who’s using what, and the local infrastructure shaping those patterns. Emphasis is on how DeKalb differs from Tennessee overall.

User estimates (orders of magnitude, not precise counts)

  • Population base: ~21,000 residents; ~16,000–17,000 adults.
  • Smartphone users: ~13,000–15,000 adults (roughly 80–88% adoption, a few points below TN’s urban-heavy average).
  • Any mobile phone (smartphone or basic): ~15,000–16,000 adults (mid-90% adoption, near statewide norms).
  • Smartphone-dependent for home internet (mobile-only or hotspot-as-primary): meaningfully above the Tennessee average. Expect a notably higher share of households leaning on phone data/hotspots due to patchy fixed broadband in outlying areas.
  • MVNO/prepaid usage: above the state average, reflecting price sensitivity and coverage-driven carrier switching.

Demographic and behavioral patterns

  • Age: Older skew than the state. Adoption is near-saturation for under-50 adults, but lower among 65+ (where coverage, price, and device familiarity matter). Expect heavier use of voice/SMS and Facebook/Messenger in older cohorts; younger cohorts mirror statewide app usage.
  • Income/affordability: Median household income trails the TN average. This correlates with:
    • Greater reliance on prepaid/MVNOs (e.g., Straight Talk, Cricket, Metro by T-Mobile).
    • Plan downgrades or carrier churn after the end of the federal ACP subsidy, with some households shifting to hotspot-based home internet.
  • Language/ethnicity: Predominantly White non-Hispanic with a smaller but meaningful Hispanic/Latino community; bilingual retail and service channels exist but are thinner than in metro TN.
  • Device mix: More LTE-only and budget Android devices remain in circulation than in urban TN; eSIM uptake and premium iPhone/flagship Android penetration are somewhat lower.

Digital infrastructure and coverage realities

  • Carriers: AT&T and Verizon generally provide the most consistent rural coverage. T-Mobile has expanded 5G but still shows patchiness off main corridors and in hollows.
  • 5G profile: Predominantly low-band (coverage-first) 5G along US-70/SR-26, SR-56, and around Smithville. Mid-band 5G is present but sparse; mmWave is effectively absent. Many users still ride LTE for capacity and reliability.
  • Terrain effects: Hill-and-hollow topography and Center Hill Lake shorelines create dead zones and signal bounce. Wi‑Fi calling is common to fill gaps indoors.
  • Tower density and siting: Fewer macro sites than urban counties; towers cluster along highways (US-70, SR-56) and population centers (Smithville, Alexandria, Dowelltown). Backhaul can be a limiting factor on some sites at peak times.
  • Fiber and fixed alternatives: DTC Communications has built out fiber in and around population centers and continues rural build-outs, but not all outlying roads are served yet. Where fiber/cable is absent or slow, residents often rely on:
    • Phone-based hotspots or LTE/5G home internet.
    • Local WISPs (fixed wireless), which can be capacity-limited.
  • Public safety and resilience: FirstNet (AT&T) coverage along main corridors supports first responders. Storms and power events can still induce localized outages; battery backup and generator coverage vary by site.
  • Seasonal demand: Traffic surges around Center Hill Lake and short-term rentals on weekends/holidays create congestion spikes, especially on uplink and during evening hours.

How DeKalb differs from Tennessee overall

  • Coverage quality spreads are wider: More pronounced dead zones and indoor coverage challenges than the state average, driving heavier reliance on Wi‑Fi calling and external antennas/boosters.
  • Slower 5G transition: A higher share of users still depend primarily on LTE; mid-band 5G capacity is less common than in metro Tennessee.
  • Higher smartphone-only/home-internet-by-hotspot use: Due to uneven fixed broadband, DeKalb has more households treating mobile service as their primary home connection compared to the statewide average.
  • Carrier mix tilted to coverage leaders: AT&T and Verizon tend to dominate where terrain is challenging; T-Mobile’s gains are real but less uniform than in cities like Nashville, Knoxville, or Chattanooga.
  • Price-sensitive plans more prevalent: Prepaid and MVNO penetration exceeds the state average, reflecting local income and the desire to switch carriers when coverage varies by road or ridge.
  • Peak-time congestion is more localized and seasonal: Lake-driven tourism produces weekend/holiday slowdowns not seen in most urban TN neighborhoods.

Implications for planners and providers

  • Prioritize additional macro sites or targeted small cells along lake perimeters and in valleys with persistent drop zones.
  • Expand mid-band 5G where fiber backhaul exists to relieve LTE congestion.
  • Continue fiber-to-the-home build-outs and coordinated mobile–fixed offerings; every rural fiber mile reduces hotspot dependency.
  • Maintain bilingual retail/support and clear Wi‑Fi-calling education, especially for senior users in marginal-signal areas.

Notes on the estimates

  • Population and demographics draw from recent Census/ACS trends; adoption rates are inferred from rural Tennessee and national Pew/industry patterns adjusted for DeKalb’s age, income, and terrain. For validation or planning-grade numbers, pair this with the FCC National Broadband Map, carrier coverage maps, DTC Communications build-out updates, and independent drive-test datasets (e.g., Ookla, RootMetrics).

Social Media Trends in Dekalb County

DeKalb County, TN social media snapshot (2025)

Quick user stats

  • Population: ~21,000 (ACS 2023). Adults 18+: ~16,000–17,000.
  • Estimated active social media users: ~11,000–14,000 adults (70–80% of adults), plus most teens.

Most-used platforms (share of local social media users; best-available estimates)

  • YouTube: 75–85%
  • Facebook: 65–70%
  • Instagram: 35–45%
  • TikTok: 25–35% overall; 60–75% among ages 18–29
  • Snapchat: 20–30% overall; 60–80% among teens/early 20s
  • Pinterest: 25–35% (skews female)
  • WhatsApp: 10–20%
  • X (Twitter): 15–20%
  • LinkedIn: 10–15%

Age-group patterns

  • Teens (13–17): Very high on YouTube, Snapchat, TikTok; light on Facebook.
  • 18–29: YouTube, Instagram, TikTok dominate; Snapchat still strong; Facebook for family/events.
  • 30–49: Facebook and YouTube are core; Instagram moderate; TikTok rising.
  • 50–64: Facebook and YouTube primary; Instagram/TikTok lower but growing.
  • 65+: Facebook first; YouTube second; others minimal.

Gender breakdown (directional)

  • Women over-index on Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, Snapchat.
    • Expect roughly: Facebook ~55–60% women; Pinterest ~75–80% women; Instagram/TikTok ~50–60% women.
  • Men over-index on YouTube, X, Reddit.
    • Expect roughly: YouTube ~55–65% men; X/Reddit ~60–70% men.

Behavioral trends to know

  • Facebook Groups act as the local bulletin board (schools, weather alerts, buy/sell/trade, youth sports). Shares/comments drive reach more than link posts.
  • Facebook Marketplace is a top driver of local transactions.
  • Short-form vertical video (Reels/TikTok) performs best; recognizable local faces/places outperform stock content.
  • Peak engagement windows: evenings 6–9 pm; weekend mid-days. Weekday mornings work for announcements.
  • Event-driven spikes: county/school calendars, severe weather, county fair, high school sports, fishing/boating season.
  • Trust signals: content from local institutions, coaches, pastors, and small businesses travels farther; tagging people/places boosts distribution.
  • Ads: tight geo (10–25 miles around Smithville/Alexandria/Liberty) with interests tied to outdoors, farming, construction, trucking, healthcare, and K‑12 tends to perform well.

Sources and method

  • Estimates derived from Pew Research Center 2024 U.S. social media adoption by platform/age/gender, adjusted for rural counties, and applied to ACS 2023 population for DeKalb County, TN. Use platform audience tools for precise counts when planning campaigns.