Dekalb County Local Demographic Profile
Here are concise, recent (Census/ACS) snapshots for DeKalb County, Tennessee:
Population
- 20,080 (2020 Decennial Census)
Age
- Median age: about 42 years (ACS 2018–2022)
- Under 18: about 22–23%
- 65 and over: about 18–19%
Gender
- Female: about 50%
Race and Hispanic origin (2020 Census unless noted)
- White alone: about 88–90%
- Black or African American alone: about 1–2%
- Asian alone: ~0.5%
- American Indian/Alaska Native: ~0.3–0.5%
- Two or more races: about 6–9%
- Hispanic or Latino (any race): about 7–9%
Households (ACS 2018–2022)
- Total households: about 8,000
- Average household size: about 2.5
- Family households: about two-thirds of all households
- Married-couple families: roughly half of households
- Households with children under 18: roughly one-quarter to one-third
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Decennial Census; American Community Survey 2018–2022 5-year estimates.
Email Usage in Dekalb County
Dekalb County, TN snapshot (estimates)
- Users: ≈21,000 residents; ≈16,300 adults. Applying national email adoption to local internet use yields about 13,500–15,000 adult email users; total residents with email ≈14,000–16,000.
- Age distribution of email users: 18–29: 15–18%; 30–49: 32–35%; 50–64: 26–28%; 65+: 20–23%. Usage is near-universal for ages 30–64 (95%+), high for 18–29 (90–95%), and somewhat lower for 65+ (~75–85%).
- Gender split: Roughly even; about 51% female, 49% male among users (mirrors local population).
- Digital access trends: About 65–75% of households have a fixed broadband subscription; 15–20% are smartphone-only internet users (higher in rural blocks). Email is commonly checked on smartphones; work/school accounts drive daily use. Public Wi‑Fi (libraries/schools) supplements access for some households.
- Density/connectivity: Population density ≈60 people per sq. mile. Dispersed housing and hilly terrain around Center Hill Lake increase last‑mile costs and leave pockets reliant on LTE/fixed‑wireless. Wired options are strongest in town centers (e.g., Smithville, Alexandria), with more variability in outlying areas.
Notes: Figures derive from ACS/state benchmarks and national email adoption rates applied to local population; treat as directional estimates.
Mobile Phone Usage in Dekalb County
Below is a pragmatic snapshot of mobile phone usage in DeKalb County, TN, with county-level estimates, who’s using what, and the local infrastructure shaping those patterns. Emphasis is on how DeKalb differs from Tennessee overall.
User estimates (orders of magnitude, not precise counts)
- Population base: ~21,000 residents; ~16,000–17,000 adults.
- Smartphone users: ~13,000–15,000 adults (roughly 80–88% adoption, a few points below TN’s urban-heavy average).
- Any mobile phone (smartphone or basic): ~15,000–16,000 adults (mid-90% adoption, near statewide norms).
- Smartphone-dependent for home internet (mobile-only or hotspot-as-primary): meaningfully above the Tennessee average. Expect a notably higher share of households leaning on phone data/hotspots due to patchy fixed broadband in outlying areas.
- MVNO/prepaid usage: above the state average, reflecting price sensitivity and coverage-driven carrier switching.
Demographic and behavioral patterns
- Age: Older skew than the state. Adoption is near-saturation for under-50 adults, but lower among 65+ (where coverage, price, and device familiarity matter). Expect heavier use of voice/SMS and Facebook/Messenger in older cohorts; younger cohorts mirror statewide app usage.
- Income/affordability: Median household income trails the TN average. This correlates with:
- Greater reliance on prepaid/MVNOs (e.g., Straight Talk, Cricket, Metro by T-Mobile).
- Plan downgrades or carrier churn after the end of the federal ACP subsidy, with some households shifting to hotspot-based home internet.
- Language/ethnicity: Predominantly White non-Hispanic with a smaller but meaningful Hispanic/Latino community; bilingual retail and service channels exist but are thinner than in metro TN.
- Device mix: More LTE-only and budget Android devices remain in circulation than in urban TN; eSIM uptake and premium iPhone/flagship Android penetration are somewhat lower.
Digital infrastructure and coverage realities
- Carriers: AT&T and Verizon generally provide the most consistent rural coverage. T-Mobile has expanded 5G but still shows patchiness off main corridors and in hollows.
- 5G profile: Predominantly low-band (coverage-first) 5G along US-70/SR-26, SR-56, and around Smithville. Mid-band 5G is present but sparse; mmWave is effectively absent. Many users still ride LTE for capacity and reliability.
- Terrain effects: Hill-and-hollow topography and Center Hill Lake shorelines create dead zones and signal bounce. Wi‑Fi calling is common to fill gaps indoors.
- Tower density and siting: Fewer macro sites than urban counties; towers cluster along highways (US-70, SR-56) and population centers (Smithville, Alexandria, Dowelltown). Backhaul can be a limiting factor on some sites at peak times.
- Fiber and fixed alternatives: DTC Communications has built out fiber in and around population centers and continues rural build-outs, but not all outlying roads are served yet. Where fiber/cable is absent or slow, residents often rely on:
- Phone-based hotspots or LTE/5G home internet.
- Local WISPs (fixed wireless), which can be capacity-limited.
- Public safety and resilience: FirstNet (AT&T) coverage along main corridors supports first responders. Storms and power events can still induce localized outages; battery backup and generator coverage vary by site.
- Seasonal demand: Traffic surges around Center Hill Lake and short-term rentals on weekends/holidays create congestion spikes, especially on uplink and during evening hours.
How DeKalb differs from Tennessee overall
- Coverage quality spreads are wider: More pronounced dead zones and indoor coverage challenges than the state average, driving heavier reliance on Wi‑Fi calling and external antennas/boosters.
- Slower 5G transition: A higher share of users still depend primarily on LTE; mid-band 5G capacity is less common than in metro Tennessee.
- Higher smartphone-only/home-internet-by-hotspot use: Due to uneven fixed broadband, DeKalb has more households treating mobile service as their primary home connection compared to the statewide average.
- Carrier mix tilted to coverage leaders: AT&T and Verizon tend to dominate where terrain is challenging; T-Mobile’s gains are real but less uniform than in cities like Nashville, Knoxville, or Chattanooga.
- Price-sensitive plans more prevalent: Prepaid and MVNO penetration exceeds the state average, reflecting local income and the desire to switch carriers when coverage varies by road or ridge.
- Peak-time congestion is more localized and seasonal: Lake-driven tourism produces weekend/holiday slowdowns not seen in most urban TN neighborhoods.
Implications for planners and providers
- Prioritize additional macro sites or targeted small cells along lake perimeters and in valleys with persistent drop zones.
- Expand mid-band 5G where fiber backhaul exists to relieve LTE congestion.
- Continue fiber-to-the-home build-outs and coordinated mobile–fixed offerings; every rural fiber mile reduces hotspot dependency.
- Maintain bilingual retail/support and clear Wi‑Fi-calling education, especially for senior users in marginal-signal areas.
Notes on the estimates
- Population and demographics draw from recent Census/ACS trends; adoption rates are inferred from rural Tennessee and national Pew/industry patterns adjusted for DeKalb’s age, income, and terrain. For validation or planning-grade numbers, pair this with the FCC National Broadband Map, carrier coverage maps, DTC Communications build-out updates, and independent drive-test datasets (e.g., Ookla, RootMetrics).
Social Media Trends in Dekalb County
DeKalb County, TN social media snapshot (2025)
Quick user stats
- Population: ~21,000 (ACS 2023). Adults 18+: ~16,000–17,000.
- Estimated active social media users: ~11,000–14,000 adults (70–80% of adults), plus most teens.
Most-used platforms (share of local social media users; best-available estimates)
- YouTube: 75–85%
- Facebook: 65–70%
- Instagram: 35–45%
- TikTok: 25–35% overall; 60–75% among ages 18–29
- Snapchat: 20–30% overall; 60–80% among teens/early 20s
- Pinterest: 25–35% (skews female)
- WhatsApp: 10–20%
- X (Twitter): 15–20%
- LinkedIn: 10–15%
Age-group patterns
- Teens (13–17): Very high on YouTube, Snapchat, TikTok; light on Facebook.
- 18–29: YouTube, Instagram, TikTok dominate; Snapchat still strong; Facebook for family/events.
- 30–49: Facebook and YouTube are core; Instagram moderate; TikTok rising.
- 50–64: Facebook and YouTube primary; Instagram/TikTok lower but growing.
- 65+: Facebook first; YouTube second; others minimal.
Gender breakdown (directional)
- Women over-index on Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, Snapchat.
- Expect roughly: Facebook ~55–60% women; Pinterest ~75–80% women; Instagram/TikTok ~50–60% women.
- Men over-index on YouTube, X, Reddit.
- Expect roughly: YouTube ~55–65% men; X/Reddit ~60–70% men.
Behavioral trends to know
- Facebook Groups act as the local bulletin board (schools, weather alerts, buy/sell/trade, youth sports). Shares/comments drive reach more than link posts.
- Facebook Marketplace is a top driver of local transactions.
- Short-form vertical video (Reels/TikTok) performs best; recognizable local faces/places outperform stock content.
- Peak engagement windows: evenings 6–9 pm; weekend mid-days. Weekday mornings work for announcements.
- Event-driven spikes: county/school calendars, severe weather, county fair, high school sports, fishing/boating season.
- Trust signals: content from local institutions, coaches, pastors, and small businesses travels farther; tagging people/places boosts distribution.
- Ads: tight geo (10–25 miles around Smithville/Alexandria/Liberty) with interests tied to outdoors, farming, construction, trucking, healthcare, and K‑12 tends to perform well.
Sources and method
- Estimates derived from Pew Research Center 2024 U.S. social media adoption by platform/age/gender, adjusted for rural counties, and applied to ACS 2023 population for DeKalb County, TN. Use platform audience tools for precise counts when planning campaigns.
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Tennessee
- Anderson
- Bedford
- Benton
- Bledsoe
- Blount
- Bradley
- Campbell
- Cannon
- Carroll
- Carter
- Cheatham
- Chester
- Claiborne
- Clay
- Cocke
- Coffee
- Crockett
- Cumberland
- Davidson
- Decatur
- Dickson
- Dyer
- Fayette
- Fentress
- Franklin
- Gibson
- Giles
- Grainger
- Greene
- Grundy
- Hamblen
- Hamilton
- Hancock
- Hardeman
- Hardin
- Hawkins
- Haywood
- Henderson
- Henry
- Hickman
- Houston
- Humphreys
- Jackson
- Jefferson
- Johnson
- Knox
- Lake
- Lauderdale
- Lawrence
- Lewis
- Lincoln
- Loudon
- Macon
- Madison
- Marion
- Marshall
- Maury
- Mcminn
- Mcnairy
- Meigs
- Monroe
- Montgomery
- Moore
- Morgan
- Obion
- Overton
- Perry
- Pickett
- Polk
- Putnam
- Rhea
- Roane
- Robertson
- Rutherford
- Scott
- Sequatchie
- Sevier
- Shelby
- Smith
- Stewart
- Sullivan
- Sumner
- Tipton
- Trousdale
- Unicoi
- Union
- Van Buren
- Warren
- Washington
- Wayne
- Weakley
- White
- Williamson
- Wilson