Fentress County Local Demographic Profile

Which reference do you prefer for the figures: 2020 Decennial Census counts or the latest ACS 2019–2023 5-year estimates? I can provide both, but the ACS set is best for age, gender, and household details for a small county.

Email Usage in Fentress County

Summary (Fentress County, TN)

  • Context: Rural Cumberland Plateau county (~18.6k residents; ~37 people/sq. mile across ~499 sq. miles).
  • Estimated email users: 13,000–15,000 residents. Basis: national adult email adoption ~90%+ (Pew) adjusted for Fentress’s older, rural profile and partial teen uptake.
  • Age profile of email users (approximate):
    • 18–29: 12–15%
    • 30–49: 25–30%
    • 50–64: 28–32%
    • 65+: 25–30% Rationale: very high email adoption at all ages but slightly lower among seniors; county skews older than the U.S. average.
  • Gender split: ~50/50; minimal gender gap in email adoption nationally, so usage likely near parity locally.
  • Digital access and trends:
    • About two-thirds of households likely have a home broadband subscription; remaining households often rely on smartphone-only, fixed wireless, or satellite. (Rural ACS/TN benchmarks; Fentress likely below state average.)
    • Mobile coverage strongest near Jamestown/US‑127 corridors; patchier in sparsely populated areas and hollows.
    • Ongoing state/federal rural broadband investments (e.g., BEAD and TN grants) are improving last‑mile connectivity, which should modestly raise email adoption among lower-income and older residents over the next few years.

Note: Figures are estimates derived from ACS/Pew rural and age-specific benchmarks applied to Fentress’s size and density.

Mobile Phone Usage in Fentress County

Summary: Mobile phone usage in Fentress County, Tennessee

Context snapshot

  • Rural, low-density county on the Cumberland Plateau (seat: Jamestown). Terrain is hilly/forested with significant public lands nearby, which makes cellular build-out harder than in most of Tennessee’s flatter, urban counties.
  • Population roughly 19,000; older median age and lower household incomes than the Tennessee average.

User estimates (order-of-magnitude, method-based)

  • Adult smartphone users: approximately 11,000–13,500 residents. Method: apply a lower rural/older-adult smartphone adoption rate (roughly 75–82%) to the adult population and include most teenagers.
  • Mobile-only internet: about 22–30% of households likely rely primarily on smartphones or mobile hotspots for home internet, higher than Tennessee’s statewide share. Rationale: lower wireline broadband availability/adoption and lower incomes increase smartphone-only reliance.
  • Lines per household: slightly below state average for postpaid family plans; higher-than-average share of prepaid and single-line accounts.

Demographic patterns (how usage differs from state-level)

  • Age: A larger 65+ population suppresses total smartphone penetration vs. the state, but younger cohorts are near-universal smartphone users. The result is a wider age gap in adoption than Tennessee overall.
  • Income and tenure: More lower-income and renter households depend on smartphones as their primary internet connection, at rates above the state average.
  • Device/plan mix: Greater prevalence of budget Android devices and prepaid plans than in metro Tennessee; upgrade cycles are longer. This can mean fewer devices capable of mid-band 5G and weaker indoor performance, widening the experience gap vs. cities.

Usage patterns versus Tennessee overall

  • Higher smartphone-only and hotspot use for home needs (schoolwork, telehealth, streaming), driven by limited or costly wired options.
  • More sensitivity to data caps and coverage; users are more likely to manage usage (e.g., SD streaming, offline downloads) than urban counterparts.
  • Messaging and voice remain important among older residents; app-based communications dominate among younger users but are constrained by coverage pockets.

Digital infrastructure and coverage

  • Carrier presence: AT&T and Verizon tend to offer the most consistent rural coverage; T‑Mobile coverage is improving along main corridors but remains more variable off-highway than in much of the state.
  • Where it works best: Along U.S. 127, TN‑52, and in/around Jamestown. Expect signal degradation in hollows, forested areas, and near large public lands; Big South Fork vicinity has notable dead zones.
  • 5G reality: Predominantly low-band 5G or LTE with modest capacity gains; mid-band 5G (e.g., C‑band/n41) is spotty and largely limited to population centers and highways. Millimeter-wave isn’t a factor.
  • Backhaul constraints: Fewer fiber routes to towers than in urban Tennessee; some sites still rely on microwave backhaul, limiting peak speeds and consistency during busy hours.
  • Tower density: Fewer macro sites and virtually no small-cell/DAS footprint, unlike Tennessee metros. This translates to larger cells, lower indoor signal, and more variable uplink performance.
  • Fixed wireless/home: 4G/5G home internet (from national carriers) is available to some addresses around towns and major roads, but coverage is patchy countywide. Where fiber/co-op builds expand, mobile performance typically benefits via upgraded backhaul.
  • Public safety: First responder networks (e.g., FirstNet on AT&T) have improved rural coverage in parts of Tennessee; Fentress has benefited along key corridors, but off-grid gaps remain.

Key ways Fentress differs from Tennessee statewide

  • Lower overall smartphone penetration due to older demographics, but higher dependence on smartphones as a primary internet source.
  • Higher share of prepaid and single-line accounts; fewer multi-line postpaid family plans than the state average.
  • More coverage variability and dead zones; lower typical speeds and fewer mid-band 5G areas than state medians.
  • Device mix and plan constraints magnify the urban–rural performance gap (fewer mid-band-capable phones, more data management behavior).
  • Greater role for fixed wireless and community anchor connectivity (schools/libraries) to fill broadband gaps; fiber expansion pace is more determinative of future mobile capacity than in urban counties.

Implications to watch

  • Fiber build-outs (co-ops and grant-funded projects) that add tower backhaul will yield the biggest step-up in mobile reliability and 5G capacity.
  • New or upgraded macro sites along U.S. 127/TN‑52 will materially reduce dead zones; small cells remain unlikely outside town centers.
  • Adoption gains among seniors and expansion of mid-band 5G will gradually narrow the experience gap with the rest of Tennessee, but terrain and density will keep Fentress below statewide performance averages for the near term.

Social Media Trends in Fentress County

Below is a concise, best-available estimate for social media usage in Fentress County, TN. Figures are modeled from the county’s rural age structure and national/rural usage benchmarks (Pew Research, 2023–2024) and should be treated as approximations. “Users” below refers to residents age 13+; platforms overlap (people use multiple).

Headline user stats

  • Population context: ≈19,000 residents; rural, older-skewing.
  • Social media penetration (13+): roughly 70–75% ≈ 11,000–12,000 users.
  • Adult penetration (18+): roughly 60–70% ≈ 9,000–11,000 users.
  • Daily use: about 60–75% of users check at least once per day.

Age breakdown of the local user base (share of all social users)

  • 13–17: ~9%
  • 18–29: ~18%
  • 30–49: ~33% (largest cohort)
  • 50–64: ~23%
  • 65+: ~18%

Gender breakdown

  • Female: ~54–56% of social media users (heavier on Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, TikTok)
  • Male: ~44–46% (heavier on YouTube, X/Twitter, Reddit)

Most-used platforms locally (share of social media users; overlaps by design)

  • Facebook: ~70–80%
  • YouTube: ~68–76%
  • Facebook Messenger: ~55–65%
  • Instagram: ~28–36%
  • TikTok: ~25–35%
  • Snapchat: ~20–28%
  • Pinterest: ~20–30%
  • X/Twitter: ~8–12%
  • LinkedIn: ~6–10%
  • Reddit: ~6–10%
  • Nextdoor: ~2–5%

Notable behavioral trends

  • Local-first engagement: Facebook Groups and Pages are central for school updates, church events, high school sports, yard sales, lost/found pets, community alerts, and Marketplace buying/selling.
  • Video consumption rising: Short, vertical video (Reels/TikTok) sees strong passive viewing; creation is concentrated among younger adults, but cross-posted Facebook Reels reach broad audiences.
  • Messaging > phone/email: Heavy use of Messenger; under-35s also rely on Snapchat and Instagram DMs for coordination.
  • News and weather: Local sources and community admins earn more trust than national outlets; significant engagement around severe weather posts and utility updates.
  • Mobile-first, bandwidth aware: Many users are on smartphones with variable broadband; concise posts, light files, captions on video, and clear thumbnails perform best.
  • Timing: Evening (7–9 pm) is peak; midday (11:30 am–1 pm) also active. Weekend mornings see strong Marketplace and community browsing.
  • Platform skews:
    • Facebook: most universal; older users especially active; strongest for community reach and events.
    • YouTube: how-to, outdoor/sportsman content, auto/DIY, gospel/Christian music; skews male.
    • Instagram/TikTok: under-35 discovery and entertainment; local creators, small businesses, boutiques, salons.
    • Snapchat: teens/younger adults for private communication.
    • Pinterest: women 25–54 for recipes, crafts, home projects.
    • X/Twitter and Reddit: niche, news/sports/weather (X) and hobby/tech/outdoors (Reddit).
    • LinkedIn: limited due to smaller white-collar base; more useful for regional hiring than hyperlocal reach.

Notes and next steps

  • These are modeled estimates, not platform-verified counts. For sharper numbers, use platform ad tools (Facebook/Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube) with a Fentress County geo-fence and age filters, then compare reach estimates.