Haywood County Local Demographic Profile

Haywood County, Tennessee — key demographics

Population size

  • Total population: 17,864 (2020 Decennial Census)

Age

  • Median age: ~40 years (ACS 2018–2022)
  • Under 18: ~22%
  • 65 and over: ~19%

Gender

  • Female: ~51–52% (ACS 2018–2022)

Racial/ethnic composition

  • Black or African American (non-Hispanic): ~55%
  • White (non-Hispanic): ~38%
  • Hispanic or Latino (any race): ~6–7%
  • Other races and multiracial (non-Hispanic, combined): ~2% (Percentages from 2020 Census and ACS; Hispanic is an ethnicity and can overlap with race)

Households

  • Total households: ~6,300 (ACS 2018–2022)
  • Average household size: ~2.45–2.50
  • Family households: ~63% of households
  • Married-couple households: ~35–36%
  • Households with children under 18: ~25–27%
  • Nonfamily households: ~37%
  • Living alone: ~32% of households; ~13–14% are 65+ living alone

Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Decennial Census; American Community Survey (ACS) 2018–2022 5-year estimates; Census Bureau QuickFacts.

Email Usage in Haywood County

Haywood County, TN email usage (estimates derived from 2020 Census/ACS and national adoption benchmarks applied locally):

  • Population and density: ~17,900 residents; ~34 residents per square mile (rural).
  • Estimated email users: ~12,800 residents use email regularly.
  • Age distribution of email users:
    • 13–17: ~770 users (≈62% of ~1,250 teens)
    • 18–34: ~3,520 users (≈90% of ~3,900)
    • 35–64: ~5,890 users (≈87% of ~6,760)
    • 65+: ~2,600 users (≈73% of ~3,560)
  • Gender split: ~53% female, ~47% male, mirroring county demographics; usage rates are effectively equal by gender.
  • Digital access and trends:
    • ~75% of households maintain a home broadband subscription; an additional ~18% of adults are smartphone‑only internet users.
    • Fixed 25/3 Mbps service is available to >95% of locations; ≥100/20 Mbps to roughly ~80%, with gigabit cable/fiber concentrated in Brownsville and along main corridors.
    • Public Wi‑Fi and mobile access play an outsize role due to low population density; most email is checked on smartphones.
    • Ongoing fiber/backhaul buildouts tied to BlueOval City and regional investments are improving speeds and coverage (2023–2025), narrowing the urban‑rural gap.

Mobile Phone Usage in Haywood County

Mobile phone usage in Haywood County, TN — 2024–2025 snapshot

Key takeaways

  • Mobile dependency is higher than the Tennessee average: more households rely on smartphones and cellular data as their primary or only internet connection, largely due to sparse wireline options outside Brownsville/Stanton and recent population/employment shifts around BlueOval City.
  • 5G is present in town centers and along I‑40, but capacity and mid‑band coverage thin out quickly in rural areas, keeping LTE as the practical baseline outside the corridor.
  • Fixed wireless (5G/LTE home internet) is seeing faster uptake than the state average because it fills gaps where cable/fiber are limited.

User estimates

  • Adult smartphone users: approximately 10,500–12,500 residents. Method: applying typical rural-Tennessee smartphone adoption (roughly 80–85% of adults) to Haywood’s adult population size (county population ≈18k; adults ≈75–80%).
  • Households using cellular data as their primary home internet: about 12–18% (vs Tennessee ~10–12%). This reflects higher mobile-only reliance in rural West Tennessee and ACS-measured cellular-only subscription rates observed in similar counties.
  • Fixed wireless home internet adoption (5G/LTE from mobile carriers): meaningfully above the statewide rate in rural census tracts, driven by recent 5G capacity adds near I‑40/BlueOval City and fewer cable/fiber options outside town centers.

Demographic breakdown of mobile usage (directional, county-appropriate)

  • Age:
    • 18–34: near-universal smartphone ownership (≈95%); very high mobile data use and app-based communication.
    • 35–64: high ownership (≈85–90%); mix of mobile and home broadband, with above-average mobile-only reliance among renters and shift workers tied to the megasite.
    • 65+: lower but rising ownership (≈60–70% in rural TN); larger share uses voice/text and telehealth apps; adoption accelerates where 5G fixed wireless is marketed as an alternative to DSL.
  • Income and housing:
    • Lower-income and renter households have the highest smartphone dependence and the highest probability of mobile-only home internet, a pattern stronger than the Tennessee average due to limited affordable wireline choices in outlying areas.
  • Race/ethnicity:
    • In rural West Tennessee, Black and Hispanic residents are more likely than White residents to rely on smartphones as the primary device and to use prepaid or budget plans; this pattern is evident in Haywood and contributes to higher mobile-only rates versus the state average.

Digital infrastructure points

  • Coverage and capacity:
    • 5G from the three national carriers covers Brownsville/Stanton, major highways, and the I‑40 corridor; mid‑band (C‑band/2.5 GHz) capacity is strongest along I‑40 and around industrial sites.
    • Outside town centers, users often fall back to LTE with notable cell-edge performance on secondary roads and agricultural areas due to wider site spacing.
  • Towers and backhaul:
    • The I‑40 fiber/backhaul corridor anchors regional capacity; tower density increases near Brownsville, Stanton, and the megasite. Rural sectors remain capacity-constrained at peak times compared with Tennessee’s urban counties.
  • Wireline competition:
    • Town cores have cable and selective fiber builds; rural tracts still show legacy DSL or no wired broadband, pushing households toward mobile and fixed wireless. Regional fiber expansion is occurring in pockets, with construction tied to state/federal grants and BlueOval City-related investment.
  • Fixed wireless:
    • 5G/LTE home internet from national carriers is broadly marketed in and around Brownsville/Stanton and along I‑40, with eligibility expanding as new 5G sectors light up. This is a primary substitute where cable/fiber is absent.
  • Public safety and coverage resilience:
    • FirstNet/priority services are available to agencies; coverage benefits from I‑40 corridor investments but remains variable off-corridor.

How Haywood differs from Tennessee overall

  • Higher mobile-only internet reliance: County share of households relying on cellular-only service is several points above the state average (estimated 12–18% vs ~10–12%).
  • Greater fixed‑wireless uptake: Adoption outpaces the state where cable/fiber are scarce and 5G mid‑band is newly available; this is less pronounced in Tennessee’s metro counties.
  • More prepaid/budget plan usage: A larger slice of users choose prepaid or value MVNOs than the statewide mix, reflecting income profiles and intermittent wireline competition.
  • Coverage quality gap outside corridors: Mid‑band 5G capacity off the I‑40/industrial corridors lags Tennessee’s urban counties; LTE remains the de facto baseline in many rural blocks.
  • Faster near‑term investment cycle: BlueOval City has accelerated tower densification, fiber backhaul, and enterprise-grade 5G in Haywood faster than typical rural counties, narrowing (but not closing) the capacity gap with the state average.

Implications

  • Mobile devices are the primary on‑ramp to the internet for a substantial share of Haywood residents, especially younger adults, renters, and lower‑income households.
  • Fixed wireless will remain a key bridge technology until rural fiber builds reach more of the county.
  • Targeted tower infill and mid‑band upgrades off the I‑40 corridor would yield outsized improvements versus the state baseline because existing rural sectors are capacity-limited.

Sources and methods

  • Estimates synthesized from: Pew Research Center (smartphone ownership by age/rurality, 2023), ACS 5‑year S2801 (device ownership and internet subscription types for rural counties, 2019–2023), FCC National Broadband Map (provider footprints and technology types), NTIA Internet Use Survey (device dependence and smartphone-only patterns), and publicly announced carrier 5G deployments in West Tennessee through 2024. County-specific figures are modeled from these datasets using Haywood’s rural profile and known infrastructure patterns; use ACS/FCC tract-level data for precise, point-in-time values.

Social Media Trends in Haywood County

Haywood County, TN social media snapshot (best-available 2024 estimates, adult population base unless noted)

Overall user stats

  • Population: ~18,000 residents; ~13,600 adults (18+)
  • Internet access: ~82–86% of households have home internet; smartphone ownership ~80–85% of adults
  • Social media penetration: 79% of adults use at least one platform monthly (10,700 adults); ~63% use social media daily

Most-used platforms (share of adults using each platform monthly)

  • YouTube: 81%
  • Facebook: 69%
  • Instagram: 39%
  • TikTok: 31%
  • Pinterest: 24% (≈41% of women; ≈8% of men)
  • Snapchat: 22%
  • X (Twitter): 19%
  • LinkedIn: 10%
  • Nextdoor: 4–5%

Age-group usage (percent using each platform monthly within each group)

  • Teens 13–17: YouTube 93%, TikTok 76%, Snapchat 68%, Instagram 66%, Facebook 30%
  • Adults 18–29: YouTube 91%, Instagram 72%, TikTok 55%, Snapchat 57%, Facebook 62%
  • Adults 30–49: YouTube 88%, Facebook 76%, Instagram 48%, TikTok 32%, Snapchat 23%
  • Adults 50–64: YouTube 80%, Facebook 70%, Instagram 30%, TikTok 20%
  • Adults 65+: YouTube 66%, Facebook 58%, Instagram 18%, TikTok 10%

Gender breakdown (adult monthly use)

  • Women: Facebook 72%, YouTube 80%, Instagram 43%, TikTok 33%, Pinterest 41%, Snapchat 24%, X 17%, LinkedIn 9%
  • Men: YouTube 83%, Facebook 66%, Instagram 36%, TikTok 28%, Pinterest 8%, Snapchat 20%, X 21%, LinkedIn 11%
  • Social media user mix by gender: ≈54% women, 46% men (reflects slightly higher female adoption of Facebook/Pinterest)

Behavioral trends observed locally in rural West Tennessee counties (applicable to Haywood)

  • Facebook is the community hub: high engagement with church events, school athletics, local government updates, and buy/sell/trade groups. Messenger is the default for local business inquiries and peer-to-peer communication.
  • Video-first consumption: YouTube for tutorials, home/auto repair, farming and outdoor content; short-form (Reels/TikTok) drives discovery for food, retail, and services among under-40s.
  • Young audiences fragment across Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat; cross-posted short video performs better than static images for 18–34.
  • Older audiences (50+) concentrate on Facebook and YouTube; they respond to clear, text-forward creative and community-centered messaging.
  • Posting windows with highest engagement: early morning (6–8 a.m.), lunch (11:30 a.m.–1 p.m.), and evenings (7–9 p.m.); Sunday spikes tied to faith and family content.
  • Local news and alerts travel via Facebook shares from regional outlets and public-safety pages; trust is highest for known local figures (pastors, coaches, officials).
  • Commerce: Facebook Groups and Marketplace are primary for local buy/sell; short-form video and Facebook Events drive turnout for festivals, sports, and school fundraisers.
  • Platform gaps: LinkedIn usage is modest; Nextdoor penetration is low outside a few neighborhoods; WhatsApp is niche except for some family and work groups.

Notes on how to read these figures

  • County-level social metrics are modeled from 2024 Pew Research Center platform adoption by age and rural/urban status, U.S. Census/ACS demographics for Haywood County, FCC/NTIA broadband data for Tennessee, and rural-South usage patterns. Percentages refer to share of adults (18+) unless a teen bracket is specified. Figures are rounded to whole percentages for clarity.