Coshocton County

Coshocton County is located in east-central Ohio, positioned between the Columbus metropolitan area to the west and the Appalachian Plateau region to the east. Established in 1810 and named for a Native American term commonly associated with the former Delaware (Lenape) settlement at the forks of the Muskingum River, the county developed as an agricultural and river-transport hub before expanding into small-scale manufacturing and services. It is a small county by population, with roughly 36,000 residents, and remains predominantly rural in character. The landscape features rolling hills, wooded valleys, and river corridors shaped by the Muskingum watershed, contributing to a mix of farmland and forest. Economic activity includes agriculture, light industry, logistics, and public-sector employment, with cultural life influenced by long-standing communities and regional traditions of eastern Ohio. The county seat is Coshocton.

Coshocton County is located in east-central Ohio along the Muskingum River corridor, with the city of Coshocton as its county seat. The county is part of a broader Appalachian-influenced region of the state characterized by small cities, villages, and rural townships.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Coshocton County, Ohio, the county had:

• Population (2020): 36,785
• Population (2023 estimate): 36,152

Age & Gender

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts (most recent profile metrics shown on the page):

• Persons under 18 years: 21.1%
• Persons 65 years and over: 20.5%
• Female persons: 50.2%
• Male persons: 49.8% (derived as the remainder of the sex distribution)

Racial & Ethnic Composition

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts:

• White alone: 94.2%
• Black or African American alone: 1.1%
• American Indian and Alaska Native alone: 0.2%
• Asian alone: 0.5%
• Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone: 0.0%
• Two or more races: 3.8%
• Hispanic or Latino (of any race): 1.7%

Household & Housing Data

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts:

• Households (2019–2023): 14,519
• Persons per household (2019–2023): 2.41
• Owner-occupied housing unit rate (2019–2023): 72.2%
• Median value of owner-occupied housing units (2019–2023): $143,900
• Median gross rent (2019–2023): $760
• Housing units (2023): 16,993

For local government and planning resources, visit the Coshocton County official website.

Coshocton County’s largely rural geography and relatively low population density can limit last‑mile network buildout, making digital communication more dependent on available fixed broadband or cellular coverage than in urban counties.

Direct county-level email usage statistics are not routinely published; broadband and device access provide the most reliable proxies for likely email access. The U.S. Census Bureau (data.census.gov) reports county indicators such as household broadband subscriptions and computer ownership, which correlate strongly with the ability to access webmail and mobile email. Age composition also influences adoption: older populations tend to have lower rates of routine online account use, including email, compared with working‑age adults; Coshocton County’s age distribution is available via ACS demographic profiles. Gender distribution is generally less predictive of email access than age and connectivity, but county sex-by-age tables are also available from the Census Bureau.

Connectivity limitations are shaped by rural infrastructure and provider coverage; fixed-broadband availability and technology types can be referenced through the FCC National Broadband Map and local planning resources from Coshocton County government.

Coshocton County is in east-central Ohio along the Muskingum River, with the City of Coshocton as the county seat. The county is predominantly rural with small population centers separated by agricultural land and wooded, rolling terrain. These characteristics—lower population density, longer distances between towers, and terrain that can obstruct radio propagation—tend to produce larger coverage gaps and more variable indoor signal quality than in Ohio’s major metropolitan counties.

Key terms: availability vs. adoption

• Network availability refers to where mobile broadband service is reported to be deployable (coverage) and at what technology level (4G LTE, 5G variants).
• Adoption refers to whether households or individuals actually subscribe to and use mobile broadband service and devices.

County-level mobile adoption data is often limited compared with availability data. The most consistent county-scale adoption indicators come from U.S. Census surveys (typically measured as smartphone presence and broadband subscription types), while network availability is most consistently mapped through FCC and other broadband-mapping programs.

Mobile penetration / access indicators (adoption)

County-level adoption is best characterized using survey-based indicators rather than carrier subscription counts.

• Household device access (smartphones): The U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) provides county estimates for whether households have a smartphone among available computing devices. This is an access proxy for mobile capability, not a subscription measure. Source tables are available via the Census Bureau’s data platforms, including Computer and Internet Use subjects. See the U.S. Census Bureau’s primary portal for ACS access at Census.gov data tools.
• Broadband subscription types: ACS also reports whether households have an internet subscription and the type (e.g., cellular data plan, cable/fiber/DSL, satellite). County-level values can be retrieved through ACS subject tables and detailed tables. This distinguishes households relying on a cellular data plan from those with wired subscriptions. See the American Community Survey (ACS) for methodology and releases.

Limitations (adoption):

• ACS measures are survey estimates with margins of error and may not precisely capture network quality or device performance.
• ACS does not directly report “mobile penetration” as carrier subscriber counts at the county level; it reports household access and subscription categories.

Mobile internet usage patterns and network availability (4G/5G)

Coverage and technology availability (availability)

• FCC Broadband Data Collection (BDC) is the primary federal source for reported mobile broadband availability. The FCC’s maps identify where providers report 4G LTE and 5G mobile broadband coverage. The relevant mapping and data access point is the FCC National Broadband Map. Provider-reported coverage can be viewed at the county level and within the county at finer geographic resolution.
• Ohio state broadband mapping and context: Ohio’s statewide broadband planning and mapping efforts provide additional context and may link to datasets and programs relevant to both fixed and mobile connectivity. See BroadbandOhio (Ohio Department of Development).

How 4G vs. 5G typically appears in rural counties (availability framing):

• 4G LTE is generally the baseline mobile broadband layer across most populated areas and along major road corridors. In rural terrain, gaps may remain in valleys, heavily wooded areas, and locations distant from towers.
• 5G availability (as shown in the FCC map) can include multiple technology categories depending on provider reporting. In rural counties, 5G footprints often cluster near towns, highways, and higher-traffic corridors, with broader rural areas remaining primarily LTE.
• Indoor vs. outdoor experience can differ substantially even where coverage is “available” on maps; availability datasets are not the same as measured signal strength inside buildings.

Limitations (availability):

• FCC BDC mobile coverage is provider-reported and should be interpreted as modeled coverage claims rather than guaranteed service quality at every point.
• Countywide summaries can mask variability within the county (town vs. outlying townships).

Mobile internet use behavior (usage)

County-specific behavioral breakdowns of mobile internet use (streaming frequency, app usage, “mobile-only” share) are generally not published at the county level in official datasets. The most defensible county-level usage proxies are:

• Households with cellular-data-plan-only internet (ACS subscription type), which indicates reliance on mobile networks for home internet access.
• Smartphone availability in the household (ACS device access), indicating capacity for mobile internet use.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

• Smartphones: ACS provides a county-level indicator for whether a household has a smartphone. This is the most direct, standardized county-level device indicator available from a public source. Access via Census.gov.
• Other devices: ACS also tracks devices such as desktop/laptop computers and tablets. These help contextualize whether mobile connectivity is likely primary (smartphone-centric) or supplementary (paired with fixed broadband and computers).

Interpretation constraint: Device presence does not equal mobile subscription. A household can have smartphones but rely primarily on Wi‑Fi from fixed broadband; conversely, households may rely on cellular plans without reporting multiple computing devices.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity

Geography, settlement pattern, and terrain (availability and performance)

• Lower population density increases the distance between towers and can reduce coverage consistency and indoor performance.
• Rolling terrain and tree cover common in this region of Ohio can attenuate signal, contributing to “pocket” gaps even when broader areas are reported as covered.
• Transportation corridors and town centers typically have stronger incentive for network investment and thus may show higher reported 5G availability and capacity than remote townships.

General county context and geography can be referenced through official local sources such as Coshocton County’s website.

Demographics and household characteristics (adoption)

County-level adoption indicators typically vary with:

• Income and affordability constraints, which can influence whether households maintain postpaid smartphone plans, rely on prepaid plans, or substitute mobile-only internet for fixed subscriptions (reflected in ACS subscription types).
• Age distribution, which affects smartphone adoption and the likelihood of using mobile services as the primary internet connection.
• Rural household dispersion, where fewer fixed broadband options can increase reliance on mobile broadband (capturable through ACS “cellular data plan” subscription reporting, though not uniquely attributable to lack of fixed options without additional local studies).

Demographic context for Coshocton County (population size, density, age structure, income) is available via the U.S. Census Bureau county profiles and ACS products accessible through Census.gov.

Summary: what can be stated at the county level

• Network availability (4G/5G): Best sourced from the FCC National Broadband Map, which supports county-level viewing but represents provider-reported modeled coverage.
• Household adoption and device access: Best sourced from ACS via Census.gov, especially smartphone-in-household and internet subscription type (including cellular data plans).
• Local variation within the county: Rural geography and terrain are structurally associated with more variable mobile coverage than urban counties, but precise intra-county performance and usage behavior generally require carrier engineering data, drive-test data, or local studies not typically published at county scale.

Coshocton County is in east-central Ohio along the Muskingum River, with Coshocton as the county seat and largest population center. The county’s largely small-town and rural settlement pattern, commuting ties to nearby regional job markets, and a local economy shaped by manufacturing, healthcare, education, and agriculture are characteristics commonly associated with heavier reliance on mobile-first communication and community-oriented Facebook use compared with large-metro areas.

User statistics (penetration/active use)

• Local (county-specific) social media penetration rates are not regularly published by major public survey programs at the county level. The most defensible estimates for Coshocton County use state and U.S. benchmarks as proxies.
• United States (adults): About 7 in 10 U.S. adults (≈69%) report using social media, according to national survey findings from the Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
• Ohio context: Ohio’s county-level internet access and broadband availability vary by rurality; Coshocton County’s rural profile aligns with areas where connectivity gaps can modestly suppress overall social media participation relative to urban counties. Reference context is available via the U.S. Census Bureau (ACS) data portal for local internet subscription/device measures (used as upstream indicators of social platform access).

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

Nationally, age is the strongest predictor of platform adoption and frequency of use (Pew):

• 18–29: Highest usage (typically well above 80% using social media).
• 30–49: High usage (commonly mid‑to‑upper 70% range).
• 50–64: Majority usage (commonly around 60%+).
• 65+: Lower but substantial minority/near‑majority usage (commonly around 40%+). Source: Pew Research Center (U.S. platform and age patterns).

Coshocton County implication: Counties with older median age and smaller-population towns generally show relatively stronger concentration of activity among middle-aged and older adults on Facebook, while younger cohorts show more multi-platform use (Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube), consistent with Pew’s age gradients.

Gender breakdown

National gender differences vary by platform more than for “any social media”:

• Overall social media use is similar between men and women in the U.S. adult population, while platform-level differences are more pronounced (e.g., women tending higher on Pinterest; men somewhat higher on platforms such as Reddit).
  Source: Pew Research Center platform demographics.

Coshocton County implication: A county-level gender split is not published in standard public datasets; the best-supported description is near-parity overall, with differences concentrated by platform type (visual curation vs. forums vs. messaging-led use), matching national patterns.

Most-used platforms (with percentages where available)

County-level platform shares are generally unavailable publicly; the most reliable percentages are national U.S. adult usage rates (Pew), which describe the typical platform mix residents draw from:

• YouTube: ~83% of U.S. adults
• Facebook: ~68%
• Instagram: ~47%
• Pinterest: ~35%
• TikTok: ~33%
• LinkedIn: ~30%
• X (Twitter): ~22%
• Snapchat: ~27%
• WhatsApp: ~29%
  Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.

Coshocton County implication (typical rural/small-town mix):

• Facebook and YouTube tend to over-index for community news, local groups, and practical video content.
• Instagram/TikTok/Snapchat concentrate more among younger residents, with TikTok often skewing toward entertainment and creator-led discovery.

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)

• Community information and groups: In non-metro counties, Facebook Groups and local pages commonly function as substitutes for hyperlocal media, supporting event promotion (school, church, civic organizations), buy/sell activity, and community alerts. This aligns with Facebook’s broad reach among U.S. adults (Pew).
• Video-led consumption: YouTube’s very high reach nationally (Pew) supports “how-to,” local interest, and entertainment consumption; engagement is often passive (viewing) rather than posting, especially among older cohorts.
• Multi-platform use among younger adults: Pew’s age patterns indicate younger adults use multiple platforms concurrently, with short-form video and messaging features driving higher daily time spent and more frequent interactions than older adults.
• Platform preference by purpose (national pattern):
  • Facebook: local connections, events, groups, marketplace-style commerce
  • YouTube: tutorials, entertainment, longer-form information
  • Instagram/TikTok/Snapchat: visual-first socializing and entertainment discovery
  • LinkedIn: employment and professional networking, generally lower overall penetration and more concentrated among college-educated and white-collar occupations
    Source: Pew Research Center platform usage and demographics.

Coshocton County maintains family and associate-related public records through county and state offices. Birth and death records are handled as Ohio vital records; certified copies are issued by the local registrar and the Ohio Department of Health, Vital Statistics. Marriage records are recorded by the Coshocton County Clerk of Courts (probate division) and maintained in court files; access is commonly available through court record services and in-person inspection. Divorce and dissolution records are maintained in the court system (domestic relations/common pleas), with docket and filing access typically provided through the Clerk of Courts and courthouse terminals.

Adoption records in Ohio are generally confidential and are maintained by the Probate Court and state systems; public access is restricted by law, with limited release through authorized processes rather than open inspection.

Public databases include county online court records and state-level vital records information. Record access occurs via online searches where available, mail requests (notably for vital records), and in-person requests at the applicable office (health department/registrar for vital records; courthouse offices for court records). Privacy limits commonly apply to adoption files, some juvenile/probate materials, and records containing protected identifiers.

Types of records available

• Marriage records (licenses and certificates)

  • Marriage license application and marriage license are created by the county probate court.
  • After the ceremony, the marriage return/certificate (signed by the officiant and returned to the court) becomes the official record of the marriage.

• Divorce records (decrees and case files)

  • Divorce decrees and related domestic relations filings are court records maintained as part of the divorce case docket and case file.

• Annulment records

  • Annulment judgments/decrees and associated filings are maintained as part of the annulment case record (a domestic relations matter handled through the courts).

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

• Marriage records

  • Filed/maintained by: Coshocton County Probate Court (marriage license issuance and recordkeeping).
  • Access: Certified copies are typically obtained from the Probate Court. Older marriage records may also be available through archival microfilm or digitized collections maintained by state or library/archives partners, depending on the record’s age and preservation format.

• Divorce and annulment records

  • Filed/maintained by: The Coshocton County Court of Common Pleas (domestic relations jurisdiction; case records are held by the clerk of courts as part of the official case file and docket).
  • Access: Case dockets and copies are obtained through the Clerk of Courts for the Court of Common Pleas. Some docket information may be available through online court records systems where provided by the county; full case documents are commonly accessed by requesting copies from the clerk.

• Statewide vital records context

  • Ohio’s central vital records office (Ohio Department of Health, Bureau of Vital Statistics) primarily centralizes birth and death records; marriage records remain county-level records created by the probate court, and divorce/annulment remain court records. Some state-level statistical divorce indexes exist for limited periods, but the decree and case file are maintained by the county court.

Typical information included in these records

• Marriage license / marriage record

  • Full names of both parties (including prior/maiden names where reported)
  • Date and place of marriage
  • Ages or dates of birth, and birthplaces (as reported on the application)
  • Residences/addresses and counties of residence
  • Parents’ names (commonly included on Ohio marriage license applications)
  • Officiant name and title, and officiant’s signature
  • Date the license was issued and date the return was filed
  • License number or book/page references in older bound volumes

• Divorce decree (final judgment)

  • Names of the parties; case number; court and county
  • Date of filing and date of final decree
  • Determinations on dissolution of the marriage
  • Orders regarding allocation of parental rights/responsibilities (custody), parenting time, and child support (when applicable)
  • Spousal support orders (when applicable)
  • Division of marital property and debts
  • Restoration of a former name (when granted)
  • References to incorporated separation agreements or shared parenting plans (when applicable)

• Annulment judgment/decree

  • Names of the parties; case number; court and county
  • Date of filing and date of judgment
  • Legal basis/findings for annulment as reflected in the judgment entry
  • Orders addressing children, support, and property matters where applicable under Ohio law
  • Any ordered name restoration

Privacy or legal restrictions

• Public-record status with statutory exceptions

  • Ohio court records and many probate records are generally public records, but access is limited for categories made confidential by law or court rule.

• Redaction and protected information

  • Courts and clerks restrict or redact certain identifiers and sensitive content under Ohio law and the Ohio Rules of Superintendence, including items such as Social Security numbers, financial account numbers, and certain information about minors.

• Sealed/expunged or restricted case materials

  • Some filings or exhibits in domestic relations matters may be sealed by court order or made non-public by rule (for example, specific investigatory materials, certain adoption-related materials, and other protected documents). When sealed, access is limited to parties and others authorized by the court.

• Certified vs. informational copies

  • Certified copies (used for legal purposes) are issued by the record custodian (Probate Court for marriages; Clerk of Courts for divorce/annulment judgments) and typically require payment of statutory fees and compliance with the custodian’s identification and request procedures. Non-certified copies may be available for informational use where not restricted.

• Identity and fraud-prevention controls

  • While marriage and divorce records are not generally “confidential vital records” in the way some other records can be, custodians may impose administrative controls on requests and may limit access to specific fields (for example, limiting release of protected identifiers) consistent with Ohio public records law and court rules.

Coshocton County is a largely rural county in east‑central Ohio anchored by the City of Coshocton and smaller villages and townships along the Muskingum River. Population scale is in the “small‑metro/rural” range (roughly mid‑30,000s in recent Census estimates), with a housing stock dominated by single‑family homes and a workforce that blends local services/manufacturing with out‑commuting to nearby employment centers.

Education Indicators

Public school districts and schools

Coshocton County’s K–12 public education is primarily provided by multiple local districts. The main districts serving county residents include:

• Coshocton City Schools
• River View Local School District
• Ridgewood Local School District
• Coshocton County Career Center (countywide career‑technical education)

School‑by‑school counts and complete school name lists vary by year due to consolidations and building configurations; the authoritative roster is maintained through the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce district/school directory (Ohio district and school directories).

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

• Graduation rates for Ohio public high schools are reported annually by the state on district and building report cards. Coshocton County districts generally track near the state’s range in recent years (Ohio’s statewide 4‑year graduation rate has typically been in the mid‑ to high‑80% range). The most recent district/building values are published on the Ohio School Report Cards.
• Student–teacher ratios are reported by district and can differ notably between city and rural local districts; the most current staffing and enrollment measures are available via the same state reporting system and associated data downloads.

Data note: A single countywide “student–teacher ratio” is not consistently published as an official statistic; district‑level ratios are the standard proxy.

Adult educational attainment

Adult educational attainment in Coshocton County is below Ohio’s statewide average on bachelor’s attainment, consistent with many rural Appalachian‑adjacent counties.

• High school diploma or equivalent (age 25+): the county is typically in the high‑80% range.
• Bachelor’s degree or higher (age 25+): typically in the mid‑ to high‑teens (%).

The most recent official county estimates are available from the U.S. Census Bureau (ACS) tables (commonly table S1501: Educational Attainment).

Notable programs (STEM, vocational training, AP/CCP)

• Career‑technical education (CTE): The Coshocton County Career Center is the countywide hub for vocational and technical programs aligned to Ohio’s CTE pathways (skilled trades, health and human services, manufacturing/engineering technologies, IT, and related fields), with adult education offerings in addition to high‑school programming (program availability varies by year). Reference: Coshocton County Career Center.
• College Credit Plus (CCP): Ohio’s statewide dual‑enrollment program is widely used across districts for college‑level coursework while in high school; participation and outcomes are reported in state report cards. Reference: Ohio College Credit Plus.
• Advanced Placement (AP): AP availability is school‑specific and is best verified through district course catalogs and the state report cards’ curriculum/advanced coursework indicators where available.

School safety measures and counseling resources

• Ohio public schools typically implement layered safety practices that include controlled building access, visitor management, emergency drills, and coordination with local law enforcement and emergency management; compliance expectations are set through state school safety policies and local board procedures.
• Student support commonly includes school counseling services and referrals to community mental‑health resources. District‑specific staffing levels and programming (counselors, social workers, mental‑health partnerships) vary and are most consistently documented in local district student services pages and Ohio report card narratives.

Data note: Comparable countywide counts of counselors/school resource officers are not published as a single standardized statistic; district disclosures are the practical proxy.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent)

The most recent official county unemployment rates are published monthly by the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS) / U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics local area statistics. Coshocton County’s unemployment rate in the most recent year has generally been in the mid‑single‑digit range, moving with statewide business cycles. Reference: ODJFS labor market information and BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics.

Major industries and employment sectors

Employment is typically concentrated in:

• Manufacturing (including durable goods and fabrication/processing)
• Health care and social assistance
• Retail trade
• Educational services and local government
• Construction
• Transportation/warehousing and utilities (regional distribution and energy-related activity varies by year)

County sector shares and trends are available from the ACS (industry by occupation/industry tables) and from employer-based datasets such as OnTheMap / LEHD.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

Common occupational groups generally align with the sector mix:

• Production and manufacturing
• Office/administrative support
• Sales and related
• Transportation and material moving
• Healthcare support and practitioners
• Construction and extraction
• Education, training, and library
• Management (smaller share than metro counties)

The most recent occupational distribution for residents is available in ACS occupation tables via data.census.gov.

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

• Commuting is primarily car-based, typical of rural Ohio counties.
• Mean commute times for similar counties are commonly in the mid‑20 minutes range, with variation by township/city location and job destination. Authoritative county commute metrics (mean travel time to work, mode share) are published in ACS commuting tables via data.census.gov (e.g., table S0801).

Local employment versus out‑of‑county work

Coshocton County functions as a net exporter of labor for some occupations, with residents commuting to larger job centers in adjacent counties while also hosting local manufacturing, health care, education, and retail jobs. The most direct measurement of “live‑in vs. work‑in” flows is available through Census OnTheMap (LEHD Origin–Destination Employment Statistics), which reports the shares of workers who live and work in the county versus those commuting out.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership and rental share

Coshocton County’s housing tenure is majority owner‑occupied, typical of rural/small‑city Ohio:

• Homeownership is generally around the low‑70% range
• Renters comprise around the high‑20% range

Official tenure estimates are available from ACS housing tables on data.census.gov (e.g., DP04 / S2501).

Median property values and recent trends

• Median owner‑occupied home value is typically below the Ohio statewide median, reflecting rural pricing and a larger share of older housing stock.
• Recent years broadly followed the statewide pattern of rising values from 2020–2024, with local variation by neighborhood, school district, and condition/acreage. The official median value measure is available via ACS (DP04), while transaction-based trend context is often summarized through regional market reports; ACS remains the standard countywide benchmark.

Data note: ACS provides multi‑year survey estimates rather than real-time sale-price indices; it is the most consistent “most recent” public county measure for median value.

Typical rent prices

• Typical gross rents in Coshocton County are generally below statewide and major-metro levels, reflecting the smaller rental inventory and lower median incomes. ACS gross rent medians and rent-burden measures are available in DP04/S2503 via data.census.gov.

Types of housing

• Single‑family detached homes dominate, including in‑town older neighborhoods and rural homes on larger lots.
• Manufactured housing has a visible presence in some townships and rural areas.
• Small apartment buildings and duplexes are concentrated in the City of Coshocton and village centers; large multifamily complexes are limited compared with metro counties.
• Rural lots/acreage properties are common outside city/village limits, with variability in utilities (well/septic) and broadband availability by location.

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools/amenities)

• In the City of Coshocton, neighborhoods closer to downtown corridors typically have shorter drives to schools, medical services, retail, and county government services.
• Outside the city, township and village areas are more car-dependent, with amenities clustered along state routes and in village centers; school access is tied closely to district attendance boundaries and bus routes. School attendance boundaries and building locations are best verified through district maps and the Ohio School Report Cards building profiles.

Property tax overview (rate and typical cost)

• Ohio property taxes are levied through county auditor and treasurer systems and vary by taxing district (school district, municipality, township) and voted levies.
• A common way to compare is the effective tax rate (tax paid as a share of market value), which in Ohio frequently falls around ~1% to ~2% of market value, with local variation driven largely by school levies. The most accurate local figures (millage/levies and estimated taxes by parcel) are provided through the Coshocton County Auditor property search and tax rate resources. Reference: Coshocton County Auditor.

Data note: A single “county average property tax bill” is not a fixed value because rates vary by taxing district and reassessment/market values vary by neighborhood and property type; parcel-level auditor data is the definitive source.*