Auglaize County is located in west-central Ohio along the Indiana border region, situated north of Dayton and west of Lima. Established in 1848 from portions of surrounding counties, it forms part of the Miami Valley–Great Lakes transition area and has longstanding ties to agriculture and small-town manufacturing. The county is mid-sized by Ohio standards, with a population of roughly 46,000 residents. Its landscape is predominantly flat to gently rolling, shaped by glacial plains and a network of rivers and canals, including areas connected to the historic Miami and Erie Canal corridor. Land use is largely rural, with extensive row-crop farming and dispersed villages, while the city of Wapakoneta serves as the county’s primary urban center and the county seat. Cultural and community life reflects a mix of long-established Midwestern settlement patterns and regional influences from nearby interstate trade and transportation routes.

Auglaize County Local Demographic Profile

Auglaize County is located in west-central Ohio along the Interstate 75 corridor, with Wapakoneta as the county seat. The county is part of a predominantly rural-to-small-city region between the Lima and Dayton metro areas.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts profile for Auglaize County, Ohio, the county’s population was 45,944 (2020 Census).

Age & Gender

County-level age distribution and sex composition are published by the U.S. Census Bureau. The most accessible consolidated figures are provided in the county’s QuickFacts demographic tables (derived from the American Community Survey and decennial census products).
Exact age-band shares (e.g., under 18, 18–64, 65+) and the male/female split are available directly within the QuickFacts table under “Age and Sex.”

Racial & Ethnic Composition

The U.S. Census Bureau publishes county-level race and Hispanic/Latino origin statistics in the QuickFacts demographic profile for Auglaize County.
The QuickFacts table reports race categories (e.g., White, Black or African American, Asian, two or more races) and Hispanic or Latino origin (of any race) for the county.

Household & Housing Data

Household characteristics and housing stock indicators for Auglaize County are reported by the U.S. Census Bureau in the county’s QuickFacts housing and households sections. These include commonly used measures such as:

  • Number of households
  • Average household size
  • Owner-occupied housing rate
  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units
  • Median gross rent
  • Housing unit totals

For local government and planning resources, visit the Auglaize County official website.

Email Usage

Auglaize County is a largely rural county in west-central Ohio where lower population density and longer last‑mile distances can constrain fixed broadband buildout, shaping reliance on email and other online communication.

Direct county-level email usage statistics are not published; email adoption is commonly inferred from proxy indicators such as household broadband subscription, computer access, smartphone access, and age structure (see U.S. Census Bureau data.census.gov).

Digital access indicators

Auglaize County’s digital access is summarized in the American Community Survey (ACS) “Computer and Internet Use” tables, which report: (1) household broadband subscriptions (cable/fiber/DSL), (2) cellular data plans, and (3) presence of a desktop/laptop or other computing device—key prerequisites for routine email use (ACS program overview).

Age and potential influence on email adoption

ACS age distributions for the county indicate the share of older adults versus school‑age and working‑age residents; older age profiles are often associated with lower adoption of newer digital services and greater need for accessible connectivity (see ACS age tables).

Gender distribution

ACS sex distributions are available but are not a primary determinant of email access compared with device and broadband availability (ACS sex tables).

Connectivity and infrastructure limitations

Service availability and gaps can be assessed via FCC National Broadband Map coverage and provider reporting; rural areas commonly face fewer provider choices and higher deployment costs.

Mobile Phone Usage

Auglaize County is in west-central Ohio, bordering Indiana, with Wapakoneta as the county seat. The county is largely rural and agricultural with small towns rather than dense urban development. Its generally flat to gently rolling terrain is favorable for wide-area radio propagation, but lower population density can reduce the economic incentive for dense cell-site deployment. These rural characteristics tend to affect network availability (where coverage is built) more than household adoption (whether residents subscribe and use mobile service), which is also shaped by income, age, and housing patterns.

Key distinctions: network availability vs. household adoption

  • Network availability (supply-side): Where 4G/5G service is reported by carriers, and where it is likely usable outdoors/indoors. This is primarily measured through carrier-reported coverage maps and modeled datasets.
  • Household adoption (demand-side): Whether households subscribe to mobile service and use it for internet access, including “cellular data only” households. This is primarily measured through surveys (e.g., U.S. Census Bureau).

County-specific coverage information is available from federal mapping programs, while county-specific adoption indicators are more limited and often reported at broader geographies or as model-based estimates.

Mobile penetration and access indicators (adoption)

What is available at/near county level

  • The most commonly used public indicator related to mobile reliance is the share of households with cellular data plans and the share that are cellular-data-only (no fixed broadband subscription). These measures are compiled by the U.S. Census Bureau through the American Community Survey (ACS) and related tables, though availability and precision vary at the county level depending on table and year.
  • For the most authoritative public source of local internet subscription and device measures, the U.S. Census Bureau’s internet subscription and device statistics provide standardized definitions and methodology via Census.gov computer and internet use. County-level extraction is typically done through ACS table tools.

Limitations

  • ACS “internet subscription” metrics measure household subscriptions and devices, not signal quality, speed, or coverage.
  • Some device-type detail and “smartphone” measures may be more available in national or state summaries than consistently at a single-county level, depending on the table and release.

Mobile internet usage patterns and connectivity (availability)

4G LTE availability

  • Rural Ohio counties, including Auglaize, typically show widespread LTE availability in carrier-reported coverage layers, especially along towns and major corridors. The most standardized public reference for broadband and mobile availability in the U.S. is the FCC National Broadband Map, which includes mobile broadband availability as reported by providers.
  • The FCC map distinguishes providers and technologies, and can be used to identify where mobile broadband is reported as available within the county. This is a network availability indicator, not adoption.

5G availability

  • 5G availability in rural counties often concentrates near population centers and along highways, with variable depth of coverage away from towns. The FCC map provides provider-reported 5G availability layers and is the primary federal reference for mobile broadband coverage comparisons at sub-county scale: FCC National Broadband Map.
  • Carrier coverage maps also provide additional context but use differing methodologies; the FCC map is typically used for cross-provider comparison.

Observed versus reported performance

  • Coverage availability layers represent modeled or reported service areas and do not guarantee uniform indoor reception or consistent throughput. For federal broadband data collection context and methodology, FCC documentation and the map interface provide definitions and reporting rules: FCC Broadband Data Collection resources via the map.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

What can be stated from public datasets

  • The primary public source for device ownership and internet access modality (desktop/laptop, smartphone, tablet, etc.) is the Census Bureau’s computer and internet use program materials and ACS-based tables: Census device and internet subscription statistics.
  • At a county level, the most relevant distinction is generally between:
    • Households with any broadband subscription (fixed or mobile),
    • Households with cellular data plan access,
    • Households that are mobile-only for internet (cellular data with no fixed subscription),
    • Households with computing devices (which correlates with how mobile service is used as primary versus supplemental access).

Limitations

  • County-level “smartphone share” is not consistently published as a single, simple statistic across all Census products; the Census framework emphasizes household device availability and subscription types. Where device ownership is available, it is usually expressed as the presence of device types in the household rather than “percentage of individuals using smartphones.”
  • Commercial market research (device model shares, operating system shares) is not typically available as public county-level data.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity

Geography and settlement pattern (availability)

  • Lower population density and dispersed housing increase the cost per covered user for additional towers and small cells, influencing the density of LTE/5G deployment and potentially indoor signal quality in outlying areas. This is most directly reflected in availability and strength variability, not necessarily in whether households subscribe.
  • The county’s flat agricultural landscape generally supports longer-range macro-cell coverage compared with mountainous regions, but long distances between sites can still yield coverage gaps or weaker indoor reception in fringe areas.

Socioeconomic and age structure (adoption and usage)

  • Household adoption patterns for mobile-only internet access are typically associated with income, housing stability, and age distributions, as reflected in Census internet subscription measures and demographic tables. The Census Bureau provides the authoritative framework for these measures and their relationship to household characteristics via Census.gov computer and internet use.
  • Rural counties often have higher reliance on mobile service where fixed broadband options are limited or costly, but county-specific reliance levels must be taken from ACS or other measured sources rather than inferred.

State and local broadband context

  • Ohio’s statewide broadband planning and mapping efforts provide context on infrastructure initiatives and may include regional perspectives relevant to Auglaize County. The official state reference point is Ohio’s broadband office, which summarizes programs and statewide priorities.
  • Local context (major roads, towns, public facilities) can be referenced through the county’s official resources for geographic and community structure: Auglaize County’s official website.

Summary of what can be concluded with high confidence

  • Availability: County-wide mobile broadband availability can be assessed using provider-reported FCC mobile coverage layers, distinguishing 4G LTE and 5G at a granular geographic level using the FCC National Broadband Map. This reflects reported service areas, not guaranteed performance.
  • Adoption: Household adoption and mobile reliance indicators (including cellular data plans and mobile-only internet households) are best sourced from ACS/Census internet subscription datasets via Census.gov. These measure subscriptions/devices, not signal strength or speed.
  • Device types: Public county-level device metrics are generally framed as household access to device categories and subscription types, not detailed smartphone model shares.

Data availability limitations specific to county-level reporting

  • Public, standardized county-level metrics for mobile penetration as a single “mobile subscriber rate” are not commonly published in a way that is both county-specific and comparable across sources; subscription counts are often reported by providers or aggregated geographies.
  • County-level mobile usage intensity (hours online, app usage, video streaming share) is not generally available from public government datasets and is typically measured by private analytics firms, which do not consistently publish county-level figures.

Social Media Trends

Auglaize County is in west‑central Ohio along the Interstate 75 corridor, with Wapakoneta (the county seat) and nearby communities such as St. Marys shaping a largely small‑city and rural context. Manufacturing, logistics, agriculture, and local civic/school networks are prominent, which generally aligns with heavier use of mainstream, mobile‑first social platforms for community updates, local news sharing, and marketplace activity rather than dense, urban “creator economy” clustering.

User statistics (penetration / active use)

  • County-specific social media penetration is not published in major national datasets at the county level; the most defensible approach is to use U.S. adult benchmarks and apply them as a context frame for Auglaize County.
  • Nationally, about 7 in 10 U.S. adults use at least one social media site (a practical proxy for “social media penetration” among adults), based on long‑running survey tracking from the Pew Research Center’s social media fact sheet.
  • Because Auglaize County has a somewhat older age profile than many metro counties (common in rural/small‑city Ohio), overall penetration commonly trends slightly below statewide/urban benchmarks, while Facebook usage tends to be relatively strong in similar demographics (consistent with national age/platform patterns cited by Pew).

Age group trends

National survey data consistently shows age as the strongest differentiator in social media adoption and platform mix:

  • Highest overall social media usage: Ages 18–29, followed by 30–49 (broadly high usage across multiple platforms). This pattern is documented in Pew’s platform-by-age survey tables.
  • Ages 50–64: high usage, but more concentrated on Facebook and more selective platform adoption overall.
  • Ages 65+: lowest overall usage, with adoption still substantial for Facebook relative to other platforms, as shown in Pew’s age breakdowns.
  • Local implication for Auglaize County: a larger share of residents in older cohorts generally corresponds to greater emphasis on Facebook for community information, with Instagram/Snapchat/TikTok usage skewing younger.

Gender breakdown

Across the U.S., gender differences are platform-specific and usually smaller than age effects:

  • Pew’s platform fact sheets show women are more likely than men to use platforms such as Pinterest, and often show modest female skews on Instagram; men are more likely than women to use some discussion- or forum-adjacent platforms. See Pew’s gender-by-platform survey results.
  • Local implication for Auglaize County: gender splits typically manifest most in platform selection (e.g., Pinterest) rather than overall social media adoption.

Most-used platforms (share of U.S. adults; used as county context benchmarks)

Pew reports the following U.S. adult usage levels (percentages vary by year; the figures below should be interpreted as current national-ordering and approximate magnitude, with exact values in the cited source):

  • YouTube (widest reach among adults)
  • Facebook (widest reach among “social networking” apps; especially strong among 30+)
  • Instagram (strong among 18–49)
  • Pinterest (notable; higher among women)
  • TikTok (high among younger adults; growing overall)
  • Snapchat (strongest among younger adults)
  • X (formerly Twitter) and Reddit (smaller reach; skews younger/college‑educated and more male in many waves)

Authoritative, up-to-date percentage tables are maintained in Pew Research Center’s social media use fact sheet, which is commonly used as the national reference for platform penetration.

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)

Patterns documented in national research, which tend to map well onto small‑metro/rural counties in Ohio:

  • Facebook as a “community utility”: Local groups, school/community announcements, and peer-to-peer recommendations often concentrate on Facebook in older and mixed-age communities; this aligns with Pew’s findings that Facebook remains broadly used across age groups, especially 30+ (Pew platform trends).
  • Video-first consumption: YouTube’s broad penetration supports high passive consumption (how‑to, entertainment, local sports highlights), consistent with Pew’s high YouTube reach (YouTube usage in Pew).
  • Younger users’ split across short-form platforms: TikTok, Snapchat, and Instagram concentrate usage among younger adults, with higher posting frequency and direct messaging intensity than older cohorts (Pew age-by-platform tables: Pew Research Center).
  • Marketplace and local commerce behavior: In communities with dispersed retail and higher driving dependence, Facebook Marketplace and local buy/sell groups often see higher engagement than platforms centered on public posting.
  • News and civic information sharing: National research finds social platforms are used for news by a substantial minority of adults; the platform mix varies, with Facebook and YouTube frequently cited in surveys tracking social media and news consumption (see Pew Research Center’s social media and news fact sheet).

Family & Associates Records

Auglaize County family-related public records include vital records and court records. Birth and death records are maintained as Ohio vital records; certified copies are issued locally through the Auglaize County Health Department and statewide through the Ohio Department of Health, Vital Statistics. Marriage records are recorded by the Auglaize County Probate Court, which also maintains probate case files that may reference family relationships (estates, guardianships). Adoption records are generally handled through the probate court and are typically not public.

Associate-related records are commonly found in court case dockets and filings (civil, criminal, domestic relations) maintained by the Auglaize County Clerk of Courts and the probate court. Property ownership and related party names appear in recorded land documents maintained by the Auglaize County Recorder.

Public database availability varies by office; county offices publish access points and contact details via the Auglaize County government website. Records are commonly accessed online through office portals where provided, or in person during business hours. Privacy restrictions commonly apply to adoption files, some juvenile matters, and certain personal identifiers in public records; certified vital records issuance follows state eligibility and identification rules.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

Marriage records

  • Marriage licenses and marriage applications: Issued by the Auglaize County Probate Court as the legal authorization to marry.
  • Marriage certificates/returns: The executed record showing the marriage was solemnized and returned to the Probate Court for recording. Certified copies are commonly issued from the recorded marriage record.

Divorce records

  • Divorce decrees (final judgments): Issued by the Auglaize County Court of Common Pleas (Domestic Relations/Juvenile matters are handled within the Common Pleas Court structure). The decree is the final order terminating the marriage and may include related orders (parental rights and responsibilities, support, division of property).
  • Divorce case files: May include the complaint, summons/service, pleadings, motions, affidavits, temporary orders, and final judgment entries.

Annulment records

  • Annulment judgments/decrees: Issued by the Auglaize County Court of Common Pleas. Annulments are court actions declaring a marriage void or voidable under Ohio law. The case file is maintained similarly to divorce case files.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

Marriage records (county level)

  • Filed/recorded with: Auglaize County Probate Court (marriage license issuance and recorded marriage return).
  • Access:
    • Certified copies are typically obtained through the Probate Court that recorded the marriage.
    • The Probate Court maintains the official county marriage record; older records may also be available through archival microfilm or bound volumes maintained by the court.

Divorce and annulment records (county level)

  • Filed with: Auglaize County Court of Common Pleas, Clerk of Courts (civil/docket records and official filings for divorce and annulment cases).
  • Access:
    • Case dockets and filings are maintained by the Clerk of Courts and are accessed through the clerk’s public records systems and in-person records access at the clerk’s office.
    • Certified copies of decrees/judgment entries are obtained from the Clerk of Courts for the Court of Common Pleas.

State-level vital records context (Ohio)

  • Ohio maintains statewide vital records through the Ohio Department of Health, Bureau of Vital Statistics, but Ohio marriage records are primarily created and maintained by local probate courts. Divorce and annulment records are court records created and maintained by county courts rather than the state vital records office.

Typical information included in these records

Marriage licenses/records (Probate Court)

Commonly recorded fields include:

  • Full names of both parties (including maiden name where applicable)
  • Date and place of marriage license issuance
  • Date and place of marriage ceremony (as returned by the officiant)
  • Officiant’s name and authority
  • Ages and/or dates of birth (varies by period and form)
  • Residence addresses or counties of residence
  • Parents’ names (varies by time period and local form practices)
  • Signatures/attestations and recording information (book/page or instrument number)

Divorce decrees (Court of Common Pleas)

Commonly included:

  • Case caption (party names), case number, court, and judge/magistrate references
  • Date of filing and date of final judgment
  • Legal basis/grounds and findings as stated in the final entry
  • Orders on termination of marriage
  • Allocation of parental rights and responsibilities, parenting time, and child support (when applicable)
  • Spousal support orders (when applicable)
  • Division of property and allocation of debts
  • Restoration of a prior name (when ordered)
  • Court costs and other administrative orders

Annulment judgments (Court of Common Pleas)

Commonly included:

  • Case caption, case number, and court/judge information
  • Findings supporting annulment under Ohio law
  • Judgment declaring the marriage void or voidable and the legal effect of the ruling
  • Related orders addressing children, support, and property (as applicable)
  • Name restoration (when ordered)

Privacy or legal restrictions

General public access framework

  • Marriage records recorded by the Probate Court are generally treated as public records, with certified copies available through the court.
  • Divorce and annulment case dockets and final decrees are generally public court records, but access is subject to Ohio court rules and any court-ordered restrictions.

Common restrictions and redactions in Ohio court and vital records

  • Sealed records: Courts may seal all or part of a case file by order, limiting public access.
  • Confidential information: Ohio courts restrict public access to certain personal identifiers and confidential information (commonly Social Security numbers, certain financial account numbers, and other protected identifiers), and courts may require redaction in public filings.
  • Juvenile-related confidentiality: Records that are part of juvenile proceedings or contain protected juvenile information can be confidential or subject to limited access, even when related to domestic relations matters.
  • Protected addresses and safety-related confidentiality: Court rules and state programs addressing safety (such as protected address provisions for certain protected persons) can limit disclosure of specific contact information in public records.
  • Certified copies and identity verification practices: Courts may require requesters to follow specific procedures for certified copies, including payment of statutory fees and compliance with the court’s records request process.

Primary custodians (Auglaize County, Ohio)

Governing Ohio access standards (high-level)

  • Ohio public records law and Ohio court rules on public access to court records and required redactions commonly govern how marriage, divorce, and annulment records are disclosed and what information is restricted.

Education, Employment and Housing

Auglaize County is in west‑central Ohio along the I‑75 corridor (county seat: Wapakoneta), bordering Indiana. The county is part of the Lima, OH micropolitan area and is characterized by small cities and villages surrounded by a largely rural/agricultural landscape. Population is about 46,000 (U.S. Census 2020), with a relatively stable, family‑household oriented community and a strong manufacturing-and-logistics presence tied to interstate access and nearby regional employment centers.

Education Indicators

Public school districts (count and names)

Auglaize County is primarily served by 6 public school districts:

  • Wapakoneta City Schools
  • St. Marys City Schools
  • New Bremen Local Schools
  • Minster Local Schools
  • Botkins Local Schools
  • Waynesfield‑Goshen Local Schools

School counts and building names vary by district and change over time due to consolidations and grade‑band reconfigurations; the most reliable current lists are maintained on district websites and the state directory. The Ohio Department of Education & Workforce district and building directory provides official listings by year (use district search): Ohio school and district directories.

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates (most recent available)

  • Graduation rates: Auglaize County districts generally post high 4‑year graduation rates relative to state averages, commonly in the mid‑ to high‑90% range in recent report years for several local districts. Exact district-by-district rates are published in the state report cards: Ohio School Report Cards.
  • Student–teacher ratios: District ratios are typically consistent with small‑town and rural Ohio patterns (often in the mid‑teens students per teacher), but ratios differ by grade level and staffing model; district-reported staffing and enrollment are available via state accountability and federal reporting (see report cards and district profiles).

Data note: A single countywide student–teacher ratio is not consistently published as a standard statistic; district-level figures in the state report cards are the best proxy.

Adult educational attainment (countywide)

Based on the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) county estimates (most recent 5‑year release):

  • High school graduate (or higher), age 25+: approximately 90%+
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher, age 25+: approximately 15%–20%

Official county tables are available via data.census.gov (ACS educational attainment).

Notable programs and pathways

Across Auglaize County districts, commonly documented offerings include:

  • Career-technical education (CTE)/vocational pathways (delivered through district programs and regional career‑tech arrangements common in west‑central Ohio).
  • Advanced Placement (AP) and College Credit Plus (CCP) participation (CCP is Ohio’s statewide dual‑enrollment program): Ohio College Credit Plus.
  • STEM and applied learning offerings (course availability varies by district; lab sciences, agriculture/industrial tech, and business/IT pathways are typical in similar counties).

Data note: A single countywide inventory of AP/CCP/CTE program counts is not maintained as one public dataset; district course guides and the Ohio report cards provide the most direct program documentation.

School safety measures and counseling resources

Public districts in Ohio operate under statewide school safety expectations that commonly include:

  • Required safety plans, drills, visitor controls, and coordination with local law enforcement, aligned with Ohio school safety requirements and guidance.
  • Student support services, typically including school counselors and referral pathways to county mental health and family services; staffing levels and service models vary by district. High-level statewide policy context is summarized by the state education agency and associated resources; district-level specifics are commonly published in student handbooks and board policies.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year available)

The most recent official county unemployment measures are published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (LAUS) and the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services/LMI. Auglaize County’s unemployment rate is generally low relative to many Ohio counties, reflecting a strong manufacturing base and high labor force attachment; current annual averages and recent monthly values are available here:

Data note: Because LAUS is updated monthly and revised, the authoritative “most recent year” should be taken from the latest annual average table in LAUS/Ohio LMI.

Major industries and employment sectors

The county’s employment structure is typical of west‑central Ohio along I‑75, with concentration in:

  • Manufacturing (including durable goods and industrial production supply chains)
  • Transportation, warehousing, and logistics (I‑75 access supports distribution and commuting)
  • Health care and social assistance
  • Retail trade and accommodation/food services
  • Construction and skilled trades
  • Agriculture and agribusiness (more significant in land use than in employment share, but still a visible sector)

Industry mix can be verified using county industry tables from the Census Bureau (ACS) and state LMI profiles:

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

Common occupational groups in similar Ohio micropolitan/rural counties—also reflected in ACS occupation categories—include:

  • Production occupations
  • Transportation and material moving
  • Office and administrative support
  • Sales and related
  • Management and business operations (smaller share than metro counties)
  • Healthcare practitioners/support
  • Construction and extraction These distributions are available in ACS occupation tables via data.census.gov.

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

  • Commute mode: Predominantly driving alone (typical of rural and small‑city counties), with smaller shares carpooling and limited transit use.
  • Mean travel time to work: Commonly in the low‑to‑mid 20‑minute range for counties of this type in west‑central Ohio; Auglaize County’s exact mean commute time is published in ACS commuting tables on data.census.gov.

Local employment vs. out‑of‑county work

Out‑commuting is common due to proximity to regional job centers (e.g., Lima/Allen County and other I‑75 corridor employers). The most direct public measures for “worked in county vs. worked outside county” come from ACS “county of workplace” and commuting flow tables (where available) and state commuting profiles:

Data note: A single consolidated “local vs. out‑of‑county” percentage is not always presented as a headline county statistic; it is derived from ACS workplace-location tables.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership and rental share

Auglaize County is a high‑homeownership county by Ohio standards:

  • Owner‑occupied: commonly around 75%–80%
  • Renter‑occupied: commonly around 20%–25% Official tenure estimates are available from the ACS housing tenure tables on data.census.gov.

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median owner‑occupied home value: Generally below the U.S. median and often around (or somewhat above) the Ohio non‑metro median, reflecting a mix of small‑town housing stock and rural properties.
  • Trend: Values increased significantly during 2020–2024 across Ohio, including west‑central counties; Auglaize County followed this broader market pattern, with growth moderated compared with major metros. The most consistent public “median value” series is ACS; market-trend series are also available from regional MLS summaries and third‑party aggregators, but ACS is the standard reference dataset: ACS median home value (owner‑occupied).

Data note: “Recent trends” are best represented by multi‑year comparisons of ACS medians or by locally published MLS statistics; no single statewide dataset provides a unified county home-price index updated monthly.

Typical rent prices

  • Median gross rent: Typically moderate for Ohio, reflecting limited large apartment inventory and a renter market concentrated in Wapakoneta, St. Marys, and village centers. ACS provides median gross rent and rent-burden measures (share paying ≥30% of income) via ACS rent tables.

Housing types and built environment

  • Single‑family detached homes dominate the housing stock.
  • Small multifamily properties and apartments are concentrated in city/village areas (Wapakoneta, St. Marys, and larger villages).
  • Rural lots, farmsteads, and low‑density subdivisions are common outside municipal cores, with larger parcel sizes and reliance on personal vehicles for access to services.

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools/amenities)

  • Wapakoneta and St. Marys provide the most direct proximity to schools, parks, medical services, and retail nodes.
  • Village centers (e.g., New Bremen, Minster, Botkins, Waynesfield) typically have compact street grids where schools and community amenities are relatively close, while township areas are more dispersed with longer drive times to schools and services.

Property tax overview (rates and typical costs)

Ohio property taxes are levied primarily through local millage (effective rates vary by taxing district within the county). In general:

Data note: A single countywide “average tax bill” is not always published as a standardized figure; parcel-weighted averages can differ sharply by school district and municipality. The county auditor provides the definitive assessment and billed-tax records by parcel.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Ohio