Morgan County is located in northeastern Colorado on the High Plains, stretching along the South Platte River corridor east of the Denver metropolitan area. Established in 1889 and named for railroad executive J. P. Morgan, the county developed around irrigated agriculture, rail transport, and regional trade serving surrounding prairie communities. Morgan County is mid-sized by Colorado county standards, with a population of roughly 30,000 residents. The landscape is characterized by broad plains, river-bottom farmland, and irrigation networks supporting crops and livestock, alongside energy-related activity and food processing. Fort Morgan, the county seat, functions as the primary population and service center, with smaller towns and unincorporated areas reflecting the county’s largely rural settlement pattern. The county’s economy and culture are closely tied to agriculture, transportation corridors, and a working landscape shaped by water management along the South Platte River.

Morgan County Local Demographic Profile

Morgan County is located in northeastern Colorado along the South Platte River corridor, with the county seat in Fort Morgan. The county is part of the state’s eastern plains region and is positioned east of the Denver metropolitan area.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Morgan County, Colorado, Morgan County had a population of 29,111 (2020). The U.S. Census Bureau provides the county’s official decennial count through the Decennial Census.

Age & Gender

Age distribution and sex composition are reported by the U.S. Census Bureau through the Morgan County QuickFacts profile (which draws from Census and American Community Survey tabulations). County-level detail for age brackets and the male/female split is available directly on that page under the age and persons sections.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

Race and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity statistics for Morgan County are published by the U.S. Census Bureau on the Morgan County QuickFacts profile. The profile reports major race categories (e.g., White, Black or African American, American Indian and Alaska Native, Asian, and Two or More Races) and separately reports Hispanic or Latino (of any race), consistent with Census Bureau standards.

Household & Housing Data

Household and housing indicators for Morgan County are available from the U.S. Census Bureau via QuickFacts (Morgan County), including measures such as:

  • Number of households
  • Average persons per household
  • Owner-occupied vs. renter-occupied housing
  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units
  • Median gross rent
  • Housing unit counts and occupancy

For local government and planning resources, visit the Morgan County official website.

Email Usage

Morgan County’s largely rural geography and low population density around Fort Morgan shape digital communication by increasing reliance on fixed broadband availability, last‑mile infrastructure, and cellular coverage for reliable email access.

Direct, county-level email usage statistics are not routinely published; email adoption is commonly proxied using household broadband subscription and computer access data. According to the U.S. Census Bureau (data.census.gov) and related American Community Survey tables, Morgan County’s digital access indicators (household broadband subscriptions and computer ownership) provide the best available signals of email reach, since email use typically depends on dependable internet access and an internet-capable device.

Age distribution influences likely email adoption because older adults tend to rely more on email for formal communication, while younger cohorts often substitute messaging platforms; Morgan County’s age profile from the Census Bureau is therefore a relevant proxy for expected usage patterns.

Gender distribution is generally not a primary constraint on email access; county sex composition is available via the Census Bureau.

Connectivity limitations in rural areas commonly include fewer provider options, longer service distances, and variable speeds; regional broadband context is tracked by the FCC National Broadband Map.

Mobile Phone Usage

Morgan County is in northeastern Colorado on the Great Plains, with a largely rural settlement pattern anchored by Fort Morgan and smaller towns and agricultural areas. The county’s relatively low population density, long travel corridors (including Interstate 76), and flat-to-gently rolling terrain generally support broad-area radio propagation, while distance from cell sites and backhaul infrastructure can still constrain coverage quality and capacity in sparsely populated areas.

Key terms: availability vs. adoption

Network availability describes whether mobile broadband service is reported/engineered to be present in an area (coverage). Adoption describes whether residents and households actually subscribe to, own, or regularly use mobile devices and mobile internet service. County-level sources commonly provide stronger information on availability than on adoption, which is often measured at state or national levels or modeled for small areas.

Mobile penetration and access indicators (adoption)

Direct, official county-level “mobile penetration” (e.g., percentage of residents with a mobile subscription) is not typically published as a single statistic for Morgan County. The most consistently available public indicators come from federal household surveys that can be tabulated to county geographies, though published county tables may be limited.

  • Household telephone service and “wireless-only” status (proxy for reliance on mobile): The U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) includes items on household telephone service and can support county estimates in some releases and tools. This is a proxy for reliance on mobile phones rather than a direct measure of individual subscriptions. See U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) and county profiles via data.census.gov (availability of specific “wireless-only” tabulations varies by table/product year).
  • Device ownership (smartphone vs. other) and mobile-internet use: The ACS does not directly report smartphone ownership at a county level in a standard published table. County-level device-type adoption is more commonly available through commercial datasets rather than official public statistical releases. This limitation means county-specific shares of smartphones vs. feature phones cannot be stated definitively from primary government statistics alone.

Limitation: Publicly accessible, official county-level statistics that directly quantify mobile subscriptions, smartphone penetration, or mobile-data plan adoption in Morgan County are limited. Household survey data can be used for related indicators (telephone service) but does not fully describe modern mobile access and usage.

Mobile internet usage patterns and network availability (4G/5G)

Availability (coverage) measures

The main public source for reported broadband coverage by technology is the FCC.

  • FCC Broadband Data Collection (BDC): The FCC publishes mobile broadband coverage by provider and technology, including 4G LTE and 5G, through the National Broadband Map. Coverage is reported by carriers as service availability polygons and can be viewed at county scale or by address/coordinate for more precision. See the FCC National Broadband Map and related methodology on the FCC Broadband Data Collection pages.

County-level interpretation:

  • 4G LTE is generally the baseline mobile broadband layer across most populated and highway-adjacent parts of rural Colorado counties; the FCC map is the authoritative public reference for Morgan County’s carrier-reported LTE footprint.
  • 5G availability in Morgan County varies by provider and is typically more concentrated near population centers and primary transport corridors than in remote agricultural areas. The FCC map distinguishes 5G availability where reported, but it does not by itself indicate typical on-the-ground performance (speed, latency) or indoor signal conditions.

Usage patterns (how people connect)

County-specific statistics on “share of users on 4G vs. 5G” or traffic by radio technology are not generally published by government sources. As a result, usage patterns are best described using what is measurable publicly:

  • Availability-based inference is not adoption: The presence of 5G coverage in the FCC map does not indicate that most residents use 5G-capable devices or 5G plans, nor does it show the proportion of mobile traffic carried on 5G.
  • Network layer vs. experience: Reported coverage does not capture congestion, deprioritization, in-building attenuation, device radio capability, or local topography/vegetation effects; these factors are more pronounced in rural areas with fewer sites and longer cell ranges.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

Public, county-specific distributions of device types are not commonly available from primary government datasets.

  • Smartphones: Nationally, smartphones are the dominant mobile device type in the United States, but a precise Morgan County smartphone share cannot be stated from a standard published county table.
  • Non-phone mobile connections: Rural areas can have meaningful shares of mobile-connected devices beyond phones (hotspots, fixed wireless substitutes, IoT/agriculture telemetry). Public county-level counts for these device categories are not typically released.

Limitation: Without a county-level device-ownership dataset, a definitive breakdown (smartphones vs. feature phones vs. hotspots/other) for Morgan County cannot be reported from public official statistics.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity

Rural settlement pattern and distance from infrastructure (availability and performance)

  • Lower density increases per-capita infrastructure cost: Sparse populations and large service areas generally mean fewer cell sites per square mile, which can reduce redundancy and capacity compared with urban counties.
  • Corridor-focused coverage: Coverage and capacity are often strongest near Fort Morgan and along major corridors such as I-76, where demand and backhaul access are concentrated.
  • Terrain: Morgan County’s plains terrain is favorable for wide-area signal propagation compared with mountainous regions, but distance to towers and limited site density remain primary constraints.

Socioeconomic and household factors (adoption)

  • Income and affordability: Adoption of mobile broadband and newer device generations is strongly associated with household income and plan affordability in national research; county-specific causal attribution requires local survey data that is not typically published.
  • Age structure and digital skills: Older age distributions are often associated with lower adoption of newer devices and app-based services, but Morgan County-specific device adoption by age is not available in standard public releases.

For demographic context at the county level (population, age, income, housing patterns), use data.census.gov and Morgan County’s official resources via the Morgan County, Colorado website.

Colorado and regional broadband planning context

State broadband offices often compile planning maps, challenge processes, and grant-related coverage analyses that complement FCC availability data, though they may focus more on fixed broadband than mobile.

  • See the Colorado Broadband Office for statewide planning resources and mapping references that may include mobile-relevant infrastructure considerations (middle-mile/backhaul, coverage gaps identified through planning efforts).

Summary: what can be stated definitively from public sources

  • Network availability (4G/5G): The most authoritative public, county-relevant source is the FCC National Broadband Map, which shows carrier-reported mobile broadband availability by technology in Morgan County.
  • Household adoption: Public, definitive county-level metrics for mobile subscriptions, smartphone penetration, and 4G/5G usage shares are limited. The ACS provides related household communication indicators and broader demographic context but does not publish a comprehensive county-level “mobile penetration” measure.
  • Connectivity drivers: Morgan County’s rural geography and settlement pattern are the primary structural factors shaping coverage density and user experience, with plains terrain generally supporting propagation but not replacing the need for site density and backhaul capacity.

Social Media Trends

Morgan County is in northeastern Colorado on the plains along the South Platte River corridor, with Fort Morgan as the county seat and major population center. The county’s economy has a strong agricultural and food-processing base and functions as a regional service hub along I‑76, characteristics that generally align local social media use with broader U.S. rural/small-metro patterns (high mobile use, heavy Facebook usage, and comparatively lower adoption of some newer platforms among older adults).

Overall social media usage (penetration and active use)

  • Local (county-level) social media penetration: Publicly available, methodologically consistent county-level estimates of “% of residents active on social platforms” are generally not published by major survey programs; most high-quality sources report state or national benchmarks rather than county figures.
  • Colorado context (broad benchmark): Colorado is a high-connectivity state, and Morgan County’s usage typically tracks national patterns more than large-metro Colorado Front Range patterns due to its rural/small-city profile.
  • U.S. benchmark for adults: About 69% of U.S. adults use at least one social media site (Pew Research Center). Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
  • Related benchmark (smartphone access): Social use is closely tied to mobile access; Pew reports high smartphone ownership nationally, which supports sustained social platform activity. Source: Pew Research Center mobile fact sheet.

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

Based on national survey patterns that are commonly observed in rural and small-city counties:

  • Highest usage: Ages 18–29 (the most consistently high adoption across platforms).
  • Strong usage: Ages 30–49 (broad multi-platform use; high Facebook and Instagram usage).
  • Moderate usage: Ages 50–64 (Facebook-dominant; lower adoption of fast-growth youth-skewed apps).
  • Lowest usage: Ages 65+ (still substantial on Facebook/YouTube, lower on Instagram/TikTok/Snapchat).
  • National age-by-platform detail: Pew Research Center platform use by age.

Gender breakdown

  • Overall: Nationally, gender gaps vary by platform more than for “any social media” use.
  • Platform-skew patterns (national):
    • Women tend to report higher usage on Pinterest and often slightly higher on Instagram.
    • Men tend to report higher usage on Reddit and some discussion-oriented platforms.
    • Facebook and YouTube are comparatively broad-based across genders.
  • Source for gender-by-platform patterns: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet (gender breakouts).

Most-used platforms (share of adults using each; best available benchmarks)

County-specific platform percentages are not typically published by major survey organizations, so the most reliable percentages come from national surveys. National adult usage (Pew) indicates the platforms most likely to be most-used in Morgan County as well:

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)

  • Facebook as a community utility: In rural and small-city areas, Facebook commonly functions as the primary channel for community announcements, local news sharing, school and sports updates, event promotion, buy/sell activity, and informal local services marketing. This aligns with Facebook’s broad age reach nationally and strong adoption among adults 30+.
  • YouTube as default video/search: High YouTube reach supports frequent use for “how-to” content tied to practical needs (home, auto, agriculture-related tasks), local interest content, and entertainment across age groups.
  • Short-form video concentrated among younger adults: TikTok, Instagram Reels, and Snapchat-style messaging skew younger, producing higher posting and viewing intensity among teens/young adults and lower regular use among older cohorts.
  • Messaging and group coordination: Group-based coordination (Facebook Groups/Messenger and, to a lesser extent, WhatsApp) is a common engagement mode for schools, churches, clubs, and extended families; this fits areas with dispersed households and strong community organizations.
  • Local business discovery: Facebook Pages and Instagram are common for local business updates and hours; Google/YouTube also plays a role through search and video.
  • National engagement context and platform patterns: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.

Family & Associates Records

Morgan County family and associate-related public records include vital records and court records. Birth and death certificates are registered locally through the Morgan County Public Health Department and filed with the State of Colorado. Marriage and civil union records are typically issued by the county clerk and recorder and maintained as part of the county’s recorded documents. Adoption records are handled through the courts as confidential case files, with limited access under state law.

Public databases are available for certain record types. Recorded documents (including marriage-related recordings when applicable) can be searched through the Morgan County Clerk & Recorder online services: Morgan County Clerk & Recorder. Court case access and register-of-actions information is available through the Colorado Judicial Branch docket search system: Colorado Courts Dockets.

Access occurs both online and in person. Vital records are requested directly from the county public health office or through the state’s vital records system: Colorado Vital Records. In-person access for recorded documents is available at the clerk and recorder’s office, and court files are accessed through the courthouse clerk, subject to court rules.

Privacy restrictions apply. Colorado limits public access to birth and death certificates and generally restricts adoption records; identity verification and eligibility requirements commonly apply. Some court cases and filings may be sealed or redacted by rule or court order.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records maintained

  • Marriage licenses and certificates (Morgan County)
    • Morgan County issues marriage licenses through the Morgan County Clerk and Recorder (Recording Department). The county records the license information as part of its official records.
  • Divorce and legal separation decrees (Morgan County)
    • Divorce decrees (and related dissolution of marriage case files) are court records maintained by the Morgan County District Court (Colorado Judicial Branch).
  • Annulments (declaration of invalidity of marriage)
    • Annulments are handled as court proceedings (often titled “Declaration of Invalidity of Marriage”) and maintained by the Morgan County District Court as part of the case record.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

  • Marriage records

    • Filed/maintained by: Morgan County Clerk and Recorder (Recording Department) for county-level marriage license records; statewide indexing and certified copies are also associated with Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), Vital Records.
    • Access:
      • County clerk offices typically provide access to marriage license records and may issue certified copies of locally recorded marriage documents.
      • CDPHE Vital Records provides statewide vital record services and certified copies subject to eligibility rules.
    • References:

  • Divorce and annulment records

    • Filed/maintained by: Morgan County District Court (case filings, orders, and decrees); case indexing is managed within the Colorado Judicial Branch systems.
    • Access:
      • Public access to case information and many docket details is available through the Colorado Judicial Branch’s online case information system (coverage and display vary by case type and confidentiality rules).
      • Copies of decrees and case documents are obtained through the clerk of the Morgan County District Court, subject to access restrictions and fees.
    • References:

Typical information included in these records

  • Marriage license / recorded marriage record

    • Names of the parties
    • Date of issuance and/or date of marriage (as reflected in the recorded instrument)
    • Place of issuance (county) and officiant information (commonly included on the completed certificate portion, where applicable)
    • Signatures/attestations and recording details (book/page or instrument number), depending on format and year

  • Divorce decree (dissolution of marriage)

    • Court name and case number
    • Names of the parties
    • Date of decree and judicial findings/orders
    • Legal determinations typically addressing status of the marriage and, where applicable, orders relating to children, support, and property (details vary by case and by what documents are requested)

  • Annulment order (declaration of invalidity)

    • Court name and case number
    • Names of the parties
    • Date of order and the court’s declaration regarding invalidity
    • Any related orders entered in the case (as applicable)

Privacy and legal restrictions

  • Vital records confidentiality (marriage records handled as vital records)
    • Colorado treats many vital records, including marriage records held through the state vital records system, as subject to eligibility requirements for certified copies and identity verification. Access through CDPHE is controlled by statute and administrative rules governing vital records release.
  • Court record access limits (divorce/annulment cases)
    • Divorce and annulment case files are generally court records, but access can be limited by:
      • Sealed documents or sealed cases by court order
      • Confidential information protections (for example, protected addresses, financial account numbers, and other sensitive identifiers)
      • Restricted records involving minors or sensitive matters where Colorado court rules or statutes limit public inspection
    • Even when a case is publicly indexed, specific documents may be withheld or redacted under applicable court rules and privacy protections.

Education, Employment and Housing

Morgan County is in northeastern Colorado on the eastern plains, anchored by Fort Morgan and serving as a regional center for agriculture, food processing, and logistics along the I‑76 corridor. The county has a largely small‑city/rural settlement pattern with a sizable Hispanic/Latino population and a workforce that includes both local employment and out‑commuting to the Denver–Aurora metro fringe. Core reference points for county demographics and baseline community indicators are available through the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts profile for Morgan County and the Census LEHD/OnTheMap commuting datasets.

Education Indicators

Public schools (counts and names)

Public K–12 education is primarily provided by:

  • Fort Morgan School District RE‑3 (Fort Morgan area)
  • Brush School District RE‑2(J) (Brush area)
  • Wiggins School District RE‑50(J) (Wiggins area; portions extend into neighboring counties)

A consolidated, school-by-school listing (names, grade spans, enrollments) is most reliably obtained from the Colorado Department of Education district/school directories; Morgan County schools can be identified by district boundaries and physical location using the Colorado SchoolView data portal. A single definitive “number of public schools in Morgan County” figure varies by how shared district boundaries and alternative programs are counted; SchoolView is the authoritative source for a current enumerated list.

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Graduation rates (district and school level) are reported annually by the state in Colorado’s graduation/Dropout reporting system and published through SchoolView. Countywide graduation rates are not always presented as a single statistic because reporting is organized by school/district; the most comparable recent measures are the district graduation rates for RE‑3, RE‑2(J), and RE‑50(J) as shown in Colorado SchoolView.
  • Student–teacher ratios are also reported at the school/district level in state datasets; ratios differ materially between elementary, middle, and high schools and across districts. SchoolView provides staffing and pupil counts used to derive these ratios.

Adult education levels

County adult educational attainment is reported by the American Community Survey and summarized in:

  • QuickFacts (Morgan County, CO) (most recent 5‑year ACS profile) Key indicators typically cited from this profile include:
  • High school diploma or higher (age 25+)
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher (age 25+)

These values update annually on a rolling basis through ACS 5‑year estimates; QuickFacts is the standard county reference for the most recent consolidated percentages.

Notable programs (STEM, CTE, AP, concurrent enrollment)

District offerings commonly documented for Morgan County schools include:

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE) pathways aligned to regional labor demand (agriculture, skilled trades, business, health, and industrial/technical fields). Colorado’s CTE program administration and district participation are documented by the Colorado Department of Education CTE office.
  • Concurrent enrollment (college coursework for high school students) is widely used across Colorado and is overseen by the Colorado Department of Higher Education; program structure and statewide requirements are summarized by Colorado Department of Higher Education concurrent enrollment.
  • Advanced Placement (AP) availability varies by high school and year; course catalogs and SchoolView academic programming indicators serve as the most direct public references.

A single countywide inventory of program availability is not published as one table; program documentation is maintained by districts and state program offices.

School safety measures and counseling resources

Colorado school safety requirements and supports that apply to districts in Morgan County include:

  • Required safety planning and preparedness frameworks and resources coordinated through the state’s school safety infrastructure (including guidance, training, and best practices) available via the CDE Safe Schools resources.
  • Student mental health and behavioral health supports, including frameworks for school-based behavioral health planning and partnerships, documented through the CDE Health & Wellness office. District-specific staffing levels (e.g., counselors, psychologists, social workers) are reported in state staffing files and reflected in SchoolView where available.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent)

The most current official unemployment rate for Morgan County is published through the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) program via the Colorado labor market information system. County time series and the latest annual averages are accessible from the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (LMI) and the BLS LAUS program.
A single “most recent year” value changes monthly; the latest annual average is the standard stable reference in LMI tables.

Major industries and employment sectors

Morgan County’s employment base is typically concentrated in:

  • Agriculture (crop and livestock production and related services)
  • Manufacturing and food processing (notably meat/food processing in the region)
  • Transportation and warehousing/logistics (I‑76 corridor activity)
  • Retail trade and local services
  • Health care and social assistance
  • Public administration and education (government and school district employment)

Sector composition and employment counts by NAICS are reported in county industry tables through CDLE LMI and federal datasets (QCEW/CBP); a common reference gateway is CDLE Labor Market Information.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

Occupational structure in Morgan County typically includes higher shares than statewide averages in:

  • Production occupations (manufacturing/processing)
  • Transportation and material moving
  • Farming, fishing, and forestry
  • Installation, maintenance, and repair
  • Office/administrative support, sales, and service roles supporting local trade, health care, and public services

County occupational employment and wage estimates are available through state/federal occupational employment statistics, surfaced via CDLE’s occupational data products and the BLS occupational employment statistics.

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

  • Mean travel time to work for Morgan County residents is published in the American Community Survey and summarized in QuickFacts.
  • Commuting flows (in‑county work vs. out‑of‑county work, and major origin/destination patterns) are best measured using LEHD. The most widely used public interface is Census OnTheMap, which provides:
    • Share of workers living in Morgan County who work in Morgan County
    • Share commuting to other counties (notably Weld/Adams/Denver‑area destinations in typical Front Range patterns)
    • In‑commuting from surrounding counties into Fort Morgan/Brush employment centers

Local employment versus out‑of‑county work

LEHD OnTheMap provides the definitive in‑flow/out‑flow breakdown (workers who both live and work in the county, residents working elsewhere, and nonresidents commuting in). Countywide “local employment vs. out‑of‑county work” is not consistently summarized in a single ACS table; LEHD is the standard proxy for this indicator.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership and rental share

Morgan County tenure (owner‑occupied vs. renter‑occupied housing) is reported in ACS and summarized in:

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median value of owner‑occupied housing units (ACS) is published in QuickFacts and is the most comparable countywide statistic: Morgan County median home value (ACS).
  • Recent trends are commonly tracked using market listings/sales datasets (e.g., MLS-based indices) that are not uniformly public at the county level without subscription. As a consistent public proxy, ACS median value changes over time (year-over-year updates in the ACS 5‑year series) provide directionality but lag market turning points.

Typical rent prices

ACS median gross rent is available via QuickFacts and detailed ACS tables:

Types of housing

Morgan County housing stock is characterized by:

  • Single‑family detached homes in Fort Morgan, Brush, Wiggins, and smaller towns/unincorporated clusters
  • Manufactured housing/mobile homes in some communities and rural settings
  • Apartments and small multifamily properties concentrated in municipal areas (Fort Morgan and Brush)
  • Rural residential lots and farm-related housing in unincorporated areas

ACS housing structure type tables are the standard public source for quantified shares by unit type.

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools/amenities)

  • Fort Morgan and Brush provide the most concentrated access to schools, parks, clinics, and retail, with more dispersed services in rural areas and smaller towns.
  • School proximity is typically highest in municipal cores where elementary/middle/high school campuses are located; rural areas commonly involve longer bus routes and driving distances to schools and services. Publicly maintained school address/location data in SchoolView supports mapping of proximity patterns: Colorado SchoolView.

Property tax overview (rate and typical cost)

Colorado property taxes are based on assessed value × local mill levy, with assessment rules set statewide and mill levies varying by taxing districts (county, municipalities, school districts, and special districts). For county-level property tax aggregates and typical bills:

  • The most authoritative local reference is the Morgan County Assessor and Treasurer documentation; county property tax process and assessment overview is generally summarized through the Colorado Department of Revenue property tax guidance. A single countywide “average tax rate” is not a stable metric because effective rates differ by location (school district and municipal boundaries) and property class; county aggregate effective rates are often reported in state property tax summaries rather than as a single uniform rate.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Colorado