Boulder County Local Demographic Profile
Key demographics — Boulder County, Colorado (U.S. Census Bureau, 2023 ACS 1-year; estimates rounded)
Population
- Total population: ~331,000
Age
- Median age: ~36–37 years
- Under 18: ~18%
- 18–24: ~15%
- 25–44: ~31%
- 45–64: ~23%
- 65+: ~13%
Gender
- Female: ~49.5%
- Male: ~50.5%
Race and ethnicity (mutually exclusive; Hispanic can be any race)
- White, non-Hispanic: ~74–75%
- Hispanic/Latino: ~14–15%
- Asian, non-Hispanic: ~6–7%
- Black/African American, non-Hispanic: ~1%
- Two or more races, non-Hispanic: ~4–5%
- Other (including American Indian/Alaska Native, NHPI): ~1%
Households and housing
- Total households: ~132,000
- Average household size: ~2.3–2.4
- Family households: ~56%
- Households with children under 18: ~25%
- Housing tenure: ~58–59% owner-occupied; ~41–42% renter-occupied
Notes: Figures are ACS estimates and may not sum to 100% due to rounding.
Email Usage in Boulder County
Boulder County, CO snapshot (estimates)
- Population: ~330,000.
- Email users: ~265,000–285,000 residents (driven by near-universal adoption among adults and CU Boulder’s large student base).
- Age distribution of email users:
- 18–29: ~23–26% (usage 95–99%)
- 30–49: ~30–34% (95–99%)
- 50–64: ~24–27% (90–95%)
- 65+: ~15–20% (80–90%)
- Gender split: ~50/50 male/female; usage differences are negligible. Nonbinary users present but a small share in available surveys.
- Digital access trends:
- Broadband subscription: roughly 94–96% of households; computer access ~96–98%.
- Smartphone-only internet: ~8–12% of households.
- Gigabit fiber widely available in Longmont (municipal NextLight) and much of Boulder/Louisville/Lafayette via private ISPs; foothill and mountain communities rely more on DSL/WISPs, with slower speeds and occasional reliability issues.
- Strong 5G coverage along the US‑36 corridor; campus and coworking spaces provide dense Wi‑Fi.
- Density/connectivity facts: County population density ≈450 people/sq mi; most residents live in the Boulder–Longmont urban corridor where multiple gigabit options and 200+ Mbps median city speeds are common; coverage thins in western, mountainous areas.
Note: Figures combine ACS “Computer and Internet Use” and Pew/National email adoption benchmarks scaled to Boulder County’s demographics.
Mobile Phone Usage in Boulder County
Below is a concise, county-focused snapshot based on 2024–2025 public data patterns (Census/ACS, FCC maps, carrier announcements, and national research). Figures are reasoned estimates; exact, county-specific measurements are rarely published.
Headline estimate of users
- Population: about 330k.
- Adults (18+): roughly 270k. With high income/education and an urban/suburban footprint, adult smartphone adoption is likely 92–94% (above Colorado’s statewide average), yielding about 250k–255k adult smartphone users.
- Youth: 13–17-year-olds likely 19k–22k smartphone users; 10–12-year-olds another 4k–6k with phones.
- Total smartphone users: approximately 273k–288k countywide. Total active mobile lines (phones + wearables + hotspots) will be higher due to multi-line and device add‑ons.
Demographic patterns that shape usage
- University effect: CU Boulder’s ~tens of thousands of students make 18–29 the heaviest mobile segment, with near-universal smartphone access, high data use (video, social, messaging), and strong demand for campus/downtown capacity and small-cells.
- Affluence/education: Higher household income and education than the state average correlate with:
- Faster upgrade cycles, higher 5G device mix, and strong iOS share.
- Greater use of wearables and eSIM/dual-SIM for travel and work.
- Older adults: Above-state-average adoption among 65+ due to income/education and telehealth usage, but still the cohort most sensitive to coverage in foothills and canyons.
- Equity gaps: Pockets in Longmont/east county (larger Latino population, more service/industrial workers) show higher prepaid and family-plan use and more reliance on Wi‑Fi to manage costs as the ACP program sunset.
- Work/commute: Heavy hybrid/remote work increases daytime mobile data and hotspot use along the US‑36 and SH‑119 corridors; event-driven surges around CU, downtown Boulder/Pearl Street, and at recreation access points (trailheads, Eldora via Nederland).
Digital infrastructure and coverage
- 5G footprint: Strong mid‑band 5G across the flatlands (Boulder, Longmont, Louisville, Lafayette, Superior) from all three nationals. T‑Mobile’s 2.5 GHz and Verizon/AT&T C‑Band are common in town; speeds taper heading into the foothills.
- Foothills/canyons: Nederland, Lyons, and canyon roads (Boulder, Left Hand, St. Vrain) have notable dead zones and capacity constraints—coverage is highly topography‑dependent. Public safety Band 14 (FirstNet) improves resilience but does not eliminate gaps.
- Small cells and venues: Dense small-cell/DAS around CU campus, stadiums, The Hill, and parts of downtown Boulder to handle event traffic and signal penetration limits in energy‑efficient buildings.
- Backhaul/fiber: Robust metro fiber from Zayo (Boulder-based), Lumen, Comcast, and municipal networks (notably Longmont’s NextLight) supports macro, small cell, and enterprise backhaul; CDOT fiber along key corridors. This fiber depth is stronger than most Colorado counties.
- Fixed Wireless Access (FWA): Widely offered east of the foothills (T‑Mobile, Verizon), with take‑up among renters and students. Overall reliance is moderated by strong cable/fiber options, especially in Longmont.
- Power resiliency: Post‑Marshall Fire hardening improved backup power and public-safety coverage at select sites; wind/wildfire PSPS conditions remain a risk for sites near the Wildland–Urban Interface.
How Boulder County differs from Colorado overall
- Higher adoption and newer devices: Smartphone penetration, 5G device mix, and wearables/eSIM usage are all above the state average, driven by students, tech workers, and higher incomes.
- Better urban/suburban 5G: Boulder’s flatland cities have denser macro/small‑cell builds and more mid‑band 5G than many Colorado counties. The state’s rural/western areas still see LTE‑only pockets; Boulder’s gaps are more localized to canyons/foothills.
- Less “mobile-only” home internet: Thanks to cable and municipal fiber (e.g., NextLight), a smaller share of households rely solely on cellular for home broadband compared with the statewide mix, though FWA is attractive in apartments and student housing.
- Different congestion patterns: Traffic surges skew to campus events, Pearl Street, and recreation corridors (Eldora/Peak-to-Peak, trailheads) rather than the resort/tourism peaks typical of mountain counties.
- Equity picture: Digital divide exists but is smaller in scale than in lower-income Colorado counties; targeted outreach (multilingual support, prepaid affordability) is most relevant in Longmont/east county.
Implications and watch areas
- Capacity management: Continue small-cell densification around CU/downtown and along US‑36/SH‑119; add seasonal capacity near Nederland/Eldora and popular trailheads.
- Coverage resiliency: Prioritize backup power and hardening for foothills/canyon sites; expand Band 14 and mid‑band 5G where feasible.
- Inclusion: Support prepaid/low-cost plans and device financing in Longmont/east county; maintain robust public Wi‑Fi in libraries, transit hubs, and civic spaces.
- Buildings: Encourage Wi‑Fi calling and indoor systems (DAS/private 5G) in energy‑efficient or shielded structures to offset penetration losses.
Social Media Trends in Boulder County
Boulder County, CO: social media usage snapshot (short)
Context and user base
- Population: ~330k residents; large student presence (CU Boulder), highly educated, high-tech workforce. This skews usage toward Instagram/TikTok/Snapchat (younger) and LinkedIn/Reddit (educated/tech).
- Adult users: Expect a high overall social-media penetration (in line with U.S. norms), with daily use concentrated in YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat.
Most-used platforms (estimated adult reach in Boulder County) Note: County-level platform shares aren’t officially published. Ranges below apply 2024 U.S. Pew Research benchmarks, adjusted to Boulder’s younger, highly educated profile.
- YouTube: 80–85% of adults
- Facebook: 60–70% (strongest among 30+; very active local groups)
- Instagram: 50–60% (over-indexes vs. U.S. average due to 18–34 share)
- TikTok: 35–40% (campus-driven; strong among 18–29)
- Snapchat: 25–35% of adults; 60%+ among 18–29
- LinkedIn: 35–45% (higher than U.S. average given education/tech)
- Pinterest: 30–35%
- Reddit: 25–30% (tech/engineering communities)
- X (Twitter): 20–25% (news, sports, policy)
- WhatsApp: 20–25% (families, immigrant communities, group coordination)
- Nextdoor: 20–30% of households (especially suburbs: Louisville, Superior, Lafayette, Longmont)
Age-group patterns (who uses what)
- Teens (13–17): TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube; minimal Facebook posting.
- 18–24 (students/early career): Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube; Reddit for campus/tech; X for sports/news.
- 25–34: Instagram and YouTube lead; Facebook for events/groups; LinkedIn high; TikTok steady.
- 35–49: Facebook (groups, school/activities), Instagram, YouTube; Nextdoor rising; Pinterest for projects.
- 50–64: Facebook, YouTube, Pinterest; Nextdoor for neighborhood updates.
- 65+: Facebook and YouTube; Nextdoor for local services/safety.
Gender skews (directional)
- Women: Slightly higher on Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest; strong engagement with local groups, events, schools, wellness.
- Men: Higher on YouTube, Reddit, X, LinkedIn; strong in tech, outdoor gear, sports.
- Facebook and WhatsApp are broadly balanced.
Behavioral trends in Boulder County
- Community-first: Heavy use of Facebook Groups and Nextdoor for hyperlocal news, school/PTA, wildfire/air-quality and weather updates, lost/found pets, and city policy.
- Outdoors and sustainability: High engagement with trails, climbing, cycling, ski/snow reports, air quality, zero-waste, EVs, climate action, and local food systems.
- Campus pulse: Spikes around move-in, housing, football and basketball, concerts, commencements; short-form video (Reels/TikTok/Shorts) dominates.
- News and issues: X and Reddit for real-time updates (storms, wildfires, road closures), civic debates (transportation, open space, housing).
- Formats: Short-form video and Stories perform best; carousels for guides/trip ideas; long-form explainer videos on YouTube for policy/science topics; AMAs on Reddit for civic Q&A.
- Timing: Evenings (7–10 pm MT) and lunch hours perform well; weather or emergency events override usual patterns.
- Neighborhood commerce: Nextdoor and Facebook Marketplace for local services, outdoor gear, and rentals; WhatsApp for family/community coordination.
- Language/culture: Facebook and WhatsApp see strong use in Spanish-speaking communities (notably in Longmont/Lafayette).
Notes on data and method
- Exact Boulder County platform shares are not publicly tracked. Percentages are estimates using 2024 Pew Research Center U.S. platform usage as a baseline, adjusted to Boulder County’s younger, highly educated demographics. Population context from U.S. Census; behavioral trends reflect Front Range patterns and local community dynamics.
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Colorado
- Adams
- Alamosa
- Arapahoe
- Archuleta
- Baca
- Bent
- Broomfield
- Chaffee
- Cheyenne
- Clear Creek
- Conejos
- Costilla
- Crowley
- Custer
- Delta
- Denver
- Dolores
- Douglas
- Eagle
- El Paso
- Elbert
- Fremont
- Garfield
- Gilpin
- Grand
- Gunnison
- Hinsdale
- Huerfano
- Jackson
- Jefferson
- Kiowa
- Kit Carson
- La Plata
- Lake
- Larimer
- Las Animas
- Lincoln
- Logan
- Mesa
- Mineral
- Moffat
- Montezuma
- Montrose
- Morgan
- Otero
- Ouray
- Park
- Phillips
- Pitkin
- Prowers
- Pueblo
- Rio Blanco
- Rio Grande
- Routt
- Saguache
- San Juan
- San Miguel
- Sedgwick
- Summit
- Teller
- Washington
- Weld
- Yuma