Alamosa County is located in south-central Colorado in the San Luis Valley, bordered by the Sangre de Cristo Range to the east and high desert and agricultural lands across the valley floor. Created in 1913 from parts of Conejos and Costilla counties, it developed as a regional center with the arrival of rail service and the expansion of irrigated farming. The county is small in population—about 16,000 residents—yet serves as a service and education hub for surrounding rural areas. The landscape includes broad, high-elevation plains, wetlands associated with the Rio Grande corridor, and views of nearby mountain ranges. Land use is dominated by agriculture, particularly irrigated crops and livestock, alongside government, health care, retail, and higher education. The county also has cultural ties to long-established Hispano communities of the San Luis Valley and to the region’s outdoor-oriented way of life. The county seat is Alamosa.

Alamosa County Local Demographic Profile

Alamosa County is located in south-central Colorado in the San Luis Valley, with the City of Alamosa serving as the county seat and a regional service hub. The county’s demographic profile is closely tied to the valley’s rural settlement pattern and the presence of Adams State University.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Alamosa County, Colorado, the county’s population was 16,376 (2020).

Age & Gender

County-level age distribution and sex composition are published by the U.S. Census Bureau in QuickFacts. According to U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts (latest available profile tables shown on the page):

  • Age distribution (share of total population)

    • Under 18 years: (see QuickFacts table)
    • 18 to 64 years: (see QuickFacts table)
    • 65 years and over: (see QuickFacts table)

  • Gender (sex) composition

    • Female persons (%): (see QuickFacts table)
    • Male persons (%): (computed as remainder of total; QuickFacts provides female %)

Note: The QuickFacts page presents the most current release for these indicators for the county; values are periodically updated by the Census Bureau.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

According to the county profile tables on U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts (latest available release displayed on the page), Alamosa County’s racial and ethnic composition includes:

  • Hispanic or Latino (of any race) (%): (see QuickFacts table)
  • Race (%):
    • White alone (%): (see QuickFacts table)
    • Black or African American alone (%): (see QuickFacts table)
    • American Indian and Alaska Native alone (%): (see QuickFacts table)
    • Asian alone (%): (see QuickFacts table)
    • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone (%): (see QuickFacts table)
    • Two or More Races (%): (see QuickFacts table)

Household & Housing Data

Household and housing indicators are also reported in U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts (latest available release displayed on the page), including:

  • Households: total number of households (see QuickFacts table)
  • Persons per household: average household size (see QuickFacts table)
  • Owner-occupied housing unit rate (%): (see QuickFacts table)
  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units: (see QuickFacts table)
  • Median gross rent: (see QuickFacts table)
  • Housing units: total housing units (see QuickFacts table)

For local government and planning resources, visit the Alamosa County official website.

Email Usage

Alamosa County sits in Colorado’s rural San Luis Valley, where long distances and low population density can raise the cost of last‑mile networks and shape how reliably residents can use email and other online services. Direct county-level email usage statistics are generally not published; the indicators below use proxies such as broadband subscription, computer access, and age structure.

Digital access in Alamosa County can be summarized using the U.S. Census Bureau (American Community Survey) internet and computer tables, which report household broadband subscriptions and computer availability as key prerequisites for routine email use. Age distribution, available through ACS demographic profiles, is relevant because older populations tend to have lower internet adoption nationally, which can reduce overall email uptake even when service exists. Gender composition is also available in ACS profiles; it is typically a weaker predictor of email adoption than age and access variables.

Connectivity constraints are commonly tracked through the FCC National Broadband Map, which documents provider coverage and technology types; rural areas often show more limited provider choice and variable fixed broadband availability.

Mobile Phone Usage

Alamosa County is in south-central Colorado in the San Luis Valley, with Alamosa as the primary population center and large surrounding areas of irrigated agriculture, open valley floor, and nearby mountainous terrain. The county’s low overall population density and the presence of valley-to-mountain topography affect mobile connectivity by concentrating strong service in and around Alamosa while increasing the likelihood of coverage gaps and weaker signal propagation in more remote areas and along some travel corridors.

Key distinction: network availability vs. household adoption

Network availability describes where mobile networks are advertised as covering an area (and at what technology generation, such as LTE or 5G). Household adoption describes whether residents actually subscribe to mobile service, rely on mobile for internet access, and the extent to which mobile substitutes for wired broadband. These measures often differ, particularly in rural counties where coverage may exist but pricing, device costs, signal quality, congestion, and limited backhaul can reduce practical usability.

Mobile penetration and access indicators (adoption)

County-specific “mobile penetration” is not typically reported as a single metric in public datasets; adoption is more commonly measured via household internet subscription categories.

  • Household internet subscription patterns (county-level): The U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) provides county estimates for internet subscription types, including cellular data plans as a distinct subscription category. These data are the primary public source for county-level indicators of reliance on mobile plans for internet access. See U.S. Census Bureau ACS S2801 (Types of Computers and Internet Subscriptions) via data.census.gov (search “S2801 Alamosa County, Colorado”).

  • Interpreting ACS mobile-plan statistics: ACS reports households with:

    • Any internet subscription
    • Cellular data plan (with or without other subscriptions)
    • Broadband such as cable/fiber/DSL (depending on table and year)
    • Computer type availability (desktop/laptop/tablet)

    These categories support a county-level view of actual adoption (subscriptions and device availability), distinct from advertised coverage.

Limitations: ACS does not directly measure signal quality, speeds, indoor coverage, or the presence of 4G/5G; it measures reported subscription types and device ownership at the household level and is subject to sampling error, especially in smaller geographies.

Mobile internet usage patterns and network availability (4G/5G)

Availability is best documented using the FCC’s Broadband Data Collection (BDC) coverage and related mapping products.

  • FCC mobile coverage data (availability): The FCC publishes location-based broadband availability and maintains a national map that includes mobile broadband coverage layers. The most widely used entry point is the FCC National Broadband Map. This is the standard public reference for where providers report 4G LTE and 5G coverage.
  • 4G LTE vs. 5G in rural counties:
    • 4G LTE coverage is generally the baseline mobile broadband layer across most populated and traveled areas, with variability in rural and mountainous margins.
    • 5G availability is typically more concentrated in denser parts of a county and along primary corridors. The FCC map provides a way to view reported 5G coverage by provider and technology category.
  • State broadband perspectives (context and cross-checking): Colorado’s statewide broadband planning and mapping resources provide additional context for rural connectivity constraints (terrain, backhaul, unserved/underserved areas). See the Colorado Broadband Office for statewide program context and mapping references that complement FCC availability data.

Limitations: FCC mobile availability layers reflect provider-reported coverage and do not directly represent experienced performance (throughput, latency, reliability) in all locations. Countywide statistics for “4G vs 5G usage share” are not typically published in official public datasets; usage is usually captured in proprietary analytics rather than county-level public reporting.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

Public, county-level device-type detail is limited. The most consistent county-level indicators are from the ACS, which reports household access to computing devices and can be used as a proxy for device mix alongside mobile-plan adoption.

  • Household device availability (county-level): ACS table S2801 includes measures such as households with a desktop or laptop, tablet, and sometimes broader “computer” availability measures (depending on year/table version). This helps distinguish places where internet access may be primarily through mobile devices versus households that also maintain traditional computers. Use data.census.gov to access these device indicators for Alamosa County.
  • Smartphone-specific ownership (county-level): County-specific smartphone ownership is not consistently available as an official statistic. Smartphone ownership is often published at national or state level (and sometimes by metro/non-metro categories) rather than by county in standard public releases.

Limitations: ACS “cellular data plan” indicates a type of internet subscription, not the exact device used (smartphone vs. dedicated hotspot vs. tablet with SIM). County-level breakdowns of smartphone vs. flip phone ownership are generally not provided in official public datasets.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage

Several structural factors influence both availability and adoption in Alamosa County:

  • Rural settlement pattern and population density: Lower density outside Alamosa increases per-user infrastructure costs and can reduce the business case for dense tower spacing, influencing coverage continuity and indoor signal strength. FCC availability layers (coverage) and ACS subscription data (adoption) together show whether residents rely on mobile plans in areas with limited wired alternatives.
  • Terrain and propagation: The San Luis Valley’s open terrain can support longer line-of-sight coverage in some directions, while surrounding mountainous areas and irregular topography can produce shadowing, dead zones, and variable performance. This affects network availability at usable signal levels beyond what advertised coverage polygons alone convey.
  • Institutional and community anchors: Alamosa hosts regional services and institutions that concentrate demand (including higher daytime population and student presence), which tends to correlate with stronger multi-provider availability in the city relative to outlying areas. County context is available via the Alamosa County government website.
  • Income and housing characteristics (adoption): ACS variables (income, poverty, housing tenure) correlate with subscription choice (mobile-only vs. fixed broadband + mobile). These relationships can be evaluated using county ACS profile tables alongside S2801 on data.census.gov, but public sources do not generally publish a single county summary that attributes causality to mobile-only adoption.

What can be stated with high confidence using public sources

  • Network availability in Alamosa County is documented through provider-reported FCC BDC coverage and can be inspected geographically using the FCC National Broadband Map.
  • Household adoption indicators for mobile internet reliance are available through ACS subscription categories, including cellular data plan measures, via Census.gov’s data portal.
  • Device availability at the household level (desktop/laptop/tablet) is also available through ACS tables, supporting an evidence-based discussion of device access, though not a direct smartphone count.

Data limitations at the county level (explicit)

  • Public datasets do not consistently provide a county-level statistic for smartphone ownership (as distinct from general computer/tablet availability).
  • Public datasets do not typically provide county-level measures of actual 4G vs. 5G usage share, median mobile speeds, or congestion by technology; these are more often measured through proprietary performance datasets or limited-scope studies.
  • Advertised coverage (FCC) and lived experience can diverge, particularly in rural and topographically complex areas, so coverage maps should be interpreted as availability reporting, not guaranteed service quality.

Social Media Trends

Alamosa County is a rural county in south-central Colorado anchored by the City of Alamosa and the San Luis Valley’s agricultural economy, with Adams State University contributing a sizable student presence and seasonal population movement. The county’s low population density and long travel distances between towns tend to elevate the importance of mobile connectivity and community-oriented channels for local news, events, and services.

User statistics (penetration / active use)

  • No county-specific, directly measured “social media penetration” dataset is consistently published at the Alamosa County level by major national survey programs. Most reliable figures are available at the U.S. adult level and are generally used as a benchmark for small-area profiles.
  • Nationally, about 7 in 10 U.S. adults use at least one social media site (Pew Research Center’s ongoing tracking, see the Pew Research Center social media fact sheet).
  • Platform-by-platform national usage is also tracked by Pew and is commonly used for local context where direct county measures are unavailable.

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

Based on Pew’s age breakdowns (U.S. adults):

  • 18–29: consistently the highest social media usage across most major platforms.
  • 30–49: high usage, generally second-highest.
  • 50–64: moderate usage; platform choice concentrates more heavily on Facebook/YouTube.
  • 65+: lower overall usage than younger groups, with Facebook and YouTube dominating among users. Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.

Gender breakdown

Pew reports notable gender skews by platform (U.S. adults), while overall “any social media” use is broadly comparable:

  • Women are more likely than men to report using Pinterest and tend to be higher on Facebook in many survey waves.
  • Men tend to be higher on some discussion- or news-forward communities and have been higher in usage on certain platforms in specific years, but the clearest persistent skew in Pew’s tracking is Pinterest (female-skewed). Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.

Most-used platforms (percentages where available)

National adult usage shares (Pew; benchmark figures used when county estimates are not published):

  • YouTube: 83%
  • Facebook: 68%
  • Instagram: 47%
  • Pinterest: 35%
  • TikTok: 33%
  • LinkedIn: 30%
  • X (formerly Twitter): 22%
  • Snapchat: 27%
  • WhatsApp: 29% Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet (platform adoption table; percentages reflect Pew’s reported U.S. adult usage in its current fact-sheet compilation).

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns / preferences)

Patterns commonly observed in U.S. research that are especially relevant to rural, university-influenced counties such as Alamosa:

  • Video-first consumption is dominant: YouTube’s reach (83% of adults) indicates that instructional content, local highlights, and short entertainment clips are central to everyday use. Source: Pew social media fact sheet.
  • Age-driven platform segmentation:
    • Younger adults concentrate more time in Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat, while older adults concentrate in Facebook and YouTube. Source: Pew.
  • Local information seeking and community updates:
    • Rural communities commonly rely on Facebook pages/groups for announcements, events, and local services, reflecting Facebook’s broad adult reach (68%). Source: Pew.
  • News and civic content distribution:
    • Social platforms function as a significant pathway to news for many adults; platform choice shapes exposure (video on YouTube, feeds/groups on Facebook, short-form on TikTok/Instagram). A related benchmark is documented in Pew Research Center’s social media and news fact sheet.
  • Messaging and lightweight sharing:
    • Use of messaging-oriented apps (e.g., WhatsApp at 29% nationally) reflects an ongoing shift toward private or semi-private sharing rather than only public posting. Source: Pew.

Family & Associates Records

Alamosa County family and associate-related records are primarily maintained through Colorado’s statewide vital records system and local courts. Birth and death certificates are created and filed as Colorado vital records; certified copies are issued by the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE) – Vital Records and by local vital records offices such as the Alamosa County public health/vital records function where available. Marriage records are recorded by the county clerk, and marriage licenses are issued by the Alamosa County Clerk & Recorder. Divorce and other family-court case files are maintained by the 12th Judicial District (Alamosa County).

Public database access for court cases is provided through the Colorado Judicial Branch’s CoCourts / Colorado Courts E-Filing and case access portal (coverage varies by case type and date). Many recorded documents can be requested through the Clerk & Recorder in person or by submitted request; some counties provide online search via linked “recording” services on the same page.

Adoption records are generally sealed under Colorado law and handled through the courts and state processes rather than open public inspection. Vital records are restricted to eligible requestors; informational (non-certified) copies and redactions may apply.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

  • Marriage licenses (and marriage certificates/returns)
    Issued by the Alamosa County Clerk and Recorder. In Colorado, the signed license is returned to the same office for recording, creating the recorded marriage record.
  • Divorce records (decrees and case files)
    Divorce actions are handled by the Colorado state court serving Alamosa County (the Alamosa County District Court, within Colorado’s 12th Judicial District). The final judgment is commonly titled a Decree of Dissolution of Marriage (or similar), with an underlying civil case file.
  • Annulments (decrees of invalidity)
    Annulments are court actions. Colorado uses the term declaration of invalidity of marriage; records are maintained as district court civil case files, with a final order/decree.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

  • Alamosa County Clerk and Recorder (marriage licensing/recording)
    Maintains original/recorded marriage license records for marriages licensed in Alamosa County. Access is typically provided through in-person requests and/or written requests according to the office’s record request procedures.
  • Alamosa County District Court (divorce and annulment case records)
    Maintains case dockets, pleadings, orders, and final decrees for dissolutions and declarations of invalidity filed in Alamosa County. Public access is generally available through the clerk of the district court, subject to sealing and confidentiality rules.
  • Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), Vital Records (state-level verification/certification)
    Maintains statewide vital records and issues certified copies/verification for eligible requestors under Colorado law and CDPHE rules. County-recorded marriage records and state vital records can differ in format and issuance authority.

Typical information included in these records

  • Marriage license / recorded marriage record
    • Full names of the parties
    • Date and place of marriage (as recorded on the return/certificate section)
    • Ages or dates of birth (as collected at licensing)
    • Residences/addresses at time of application (commonly collected)
    • Officiant name/title and signature (or notation for self-solemnization, where applicable under Colorado law)
    • License number, issue date, recording/filing information, and clerk certification
  • Divorce decree / dissolution case file
    • Court name, case number, filing and decree dates
    • Names of parties
    • Type of action (dissolution/legal separation) and findings/orders
    • Orders addressing property division, debts, maintenance (spousal support), and restoration of former name (when ordered)
    • Parenting time/decision-making responsibility and child support orders (when minor children are involved), often in separate orders or attachments
  • Annulment (declaration of invalidity) decree / case file
    • Court name, case number, filing and decree dates
    • Names of parties
    • Legal basis for invalidity and the court’s declaration
    • Associated orders (property/financial and, where applicable, matters involving children)

Privacy or legal restrictions

  • Marriage records
    • Recorded marriage licenses are generally treated as public records at the county level, with limited redactions applied in practice for sensitive identifiers (for example, to mitigate identity theft risk).
    • Certified copies issued by state vital records agencies may be subject to eligibility and identification requirements under Colorado vital records rules.
  • Divorce and annulment court records
    • Court case records are generally public, but restricted access applies to certain categories, including:
      • Sealed cases or sealed documents by court order
      • Sensitive personal information subject to redaction rules
      • Records involving minors, including adoption-related materials and certain child-protection information (not typically part of routine dissolution, but custody-related filings may contain restricted information)
      • Domestic relations financial disclosures and other documents that may be treated as confidential or limited-access under court rule or order
    • Access to nonpublic documents requires authorization under applicable Colorado court rules and statutes.

Reference sources

Education, Employment and Housing

Alamosa County is in south-central Colorado’s San Luis Valley, with Alamosa as the county seat and primary service center. The county is largely rural outside the city, with an economy tied to education, healthcare, agriculture, and public services. Population size and demographic detail vary by source and year; the most consistently cited recent benchmark is the U.S. Census Bureau’s county profile and American Community Survey (ACS) estimates (county totals in the mid‑to‑high teens, thousands). For baseline county context, the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Alamosa County provides regularly updated ACS indicators.

Education Indicators

Public schools (count and names)

Public K–12 schools in the county are primarily operated by Alamosa School District RE‑11J and Sangre de Cristo School District RE‑22J (both serving Alamosa County). The most reliable way to confirm the current school list and names (as openings/closures and grade configurations change) is the district and state directories:

Note on availability: A single, static count of “public schools” for the county is not consistently published in one official table; the CDE directory is the authoritative source for current school rosters and names.

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratios: Ratios differ by district and school level and are reported through CDE district and school profiles rather than one countywide figure. For the most recent ratios available by school, use the “Enrollment/Staffing” and school profile sections in CDE SchoolView.
  • Graduation rates: Graduation rates are tracked annually by CDE and are best cited at the district/school level (countywide aggregation is not consistently presented as a standalone official statistic). The most recent district and high school graduation outcomes are published in CDE’s graduation and completion reporting and SchoolView profiles: CDE Graduation & Completion Data.

Adult educational attainment

ACS provides the standard county measures of adult education. For the most recent values available in the county profile tables, the most widely referenced release is the 5‑year ACS estimate set (updated annually in Census products):

Proxy note: When county-level adult attainment is compared regionally, Alamosa County’s figures are often influenced by the presence of higher education (Adams State University in Alamosa), which can raise local degree attainment relative to surrounding rural counties, while still differing from Colorado statewide levels. The definitive percentages should be taken from the current ACS tables in QuickFacts.

Notable programs (STEM, career/technical, AP)

Program offerings are primarily district- and school-specific rather than published as a single county inventory. Commonly documented program categories in Colorado public schools include:

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE)/vocational pathways: CDE CTE reporting and district program pages provide the clearest documentation: CDE Career & Technical Education.
  • Advanced Placement (AP), concurrent enrollment, and other advanced coursework: typically documented in high school course catalogs and School Performance Framework materials listed in SchoolView: CDE SchoolView.
  • STEM and applied learning initiatives: usually described in district strategic plans, school improvement plans, and course catalogs hosted on district websites.

Proxy note: Without a single published countywide program audit, district and school documents are the best available source for definitive program availability.

School safety measures and counseling resources

Colorado districts generally document safety and student support through:

  • Required safety planning and drills, visitor controls, and coordination with local law enforcement, described in district policy manuals and school handbooks (district sites) and aligned with state guidance: CDE Safe Schools Resources.
  • Student counseling, mental health, and social-work supports, typically listed under student services on district websites and reflected in staffing/support services in CDE profiles (where reported).

Availability note: Detailed staffing counts for counselors/social workers are not consistently presented as a single county statistic; district staffing reports and school profiles are the most direct sources.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year available)

County unemployment is reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS). The most recent annual average and latest monthly rates for Alamosa County are available here:

Proxy note: A single value is not reproduced here because LAUS is updated monthly; the definitive “most recent year” annual average is the latest published annual LAUS value for Alamosa County.

Major industries and employment sectors

Alamosa County’s employment base, as reflected in ACS industry categories and regional economic reporting, is typically concentrated in:

  • Educational services (notably higher education and K–12)
  • Health care and social assistance
  • Retail trade and accommodation/food services (service hub role for the valley)
  • Agriculture and related support activities in the surrounding San Luis Valley
  • Public administration and local government services

Definitive sector shares for employed residents are available in ACS “Industry by Occupation/Industry by Sex” tables and county profiles:

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

Common occupational groupings in rural service-center counties in Colorado (and typically prominent in Alamosa County ACS profiles) include:

  • Education, training, and library occupations
  • Healthcare practitioners and support occupations
  • Sales and office occupations
  • Service occupations (food service, building/grounds, personal care)
  • Transportation and material moving
  • Construction and maintenance
  • Management and business/finance (smaller share than metro counties)

Definitive occupational shares are published in ACS county occupation tables:

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

ACS provides standard commuting measures, including commute mode, mean travel time to work, and where people work. The most recent county estimates can be pulled from:

Proxy note: Rural counties with a single main town typically show shorter average commutes for in-town workers and longer commutes for workers traveling to other San Luis Valley communities; the definitive mean commute time and mode split should be taken from the latest ACS table for Alamosa County.

Local employment vs. out-of-county work

Two complementary official measures are commonly used:

  • ACS “Place of Work” and commuting flow indicators (residence-based perspective): data.census.gov
  • LEHD/OnTheMap (job counts by workplace and origin/destination flows, employer-based perspective): U.S. Census OnTheMap (LEHD)

In rural regions, a meaningful share of residents work within the county seat area (Alamosa), while another portion commutes to other valley counties; the precise in-county vs. out-of-county split is most definitively quantified using OnTheMap origin–destination flows for the latest available year.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership rate and rental share

Homeownership and renting in Alamosa County are reported through ACS (owner-occupied vs. renter-occupied housing units):

Community pattern note: The City of Alamosa typically contains a larger renter share than surrounding rural areas due to higher-density housing, workforce mobility, and student-related demand.

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median owner-occupied home value: reported via ACS in Census QuickFacts and detailed ACS tables on data.census.gov.
  • Recent trends: County-level price trends are often tracked using market datasets (e.g., MLS-based series) that are not uniform across sources. The most defensible “official” trend proxy is comparing consecutive ACS 5‑year releases (median value over time), acknowledging that ACS is survey-based and smoothed.

Typical rent prices

Proxy note: In Alamosa County, rents commonly reflect a mix of workforce housing demand and student/academic-year leasing patterns in and near Alamosa.

Types of housing

The county’s housing stock is generally characterized by:

  • Single-family detached homes (dominant in many neighborhoods and rural areas)
  • Manufactured homes and rural lots/acreage properties outside the city
  • Small multi-family buildings and apartments, more common in Alamosa and near institutional/employment centers

Definitive breakdowns by structure type (e.g., single-family vs. multi-unit vs. mobile/manufactured) are available in ACS “Units in Structure” tables:

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools or amenities)

  • Alamosa (city): more walkable access to schools, parks, retail, and major employers (education/healthcare), with a broader range of rentals and smaller lot sizes.
  • Outlying communities and rural areas: larger parcels, more reliance on driving for schools and services, and more agricultural-adjacent residential patterns.

Availability note: Countywide, standardized “neighborhood” typologies are not published as a single official dataset; the characteristics above reflect the county’s documented settlement pattern (one primary city plus rural surroundings).

Property tax overview (rate and typical homeowner cost)

Colorado property taxes depend on assessed value, assessment rate (set by state law and varying by property class), and local mill levies. The most authoritative county references are:

Proxy note: A single “average property tax rate” for the county is not consistently presented in one official county summary table because mill levies vary by taxing district. For a typical homeowner cost proxy, the most standardized measure is ACS “Median real estate taxes paid,” available in county housing cost tables on data.census.gov and often summarized in QuickFacts when included.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Colorado