Moffat County is a rural county in the far northwestern corner of Colorado, bordering Wyoming to the north and Utah to the west. It lies largely within the Colorado Plateau and the high desert basins of the Yampa River region, with notable public lands such as the Dinosaur National Monument area and parts of the surrounding national forests and BLM-managed terrain. Established in 1911 and named for railroad official David H. Moffat, the county developed around ranching, energy extraction, and transportation links across the Intermountain West. The population is small by statewide standards, totaling roughly 13,000 residents in the 2020 U.S. Census. Craig, the county seat and largest community, functions as the primary service and employment center. Moffat County’s landscape features sagebrush steppe, river canyons, and upland forests, and its economy has historically emphasized agriculture, mining, and power generation, alongside outdoor recreation and public-land management activities.

Moffat County Local Demographic Profile

Moffat County is located in northwestern Colorado, anchored by the City of Craig and bordered by Wyoming to the north. The county is part of Colorado’s sparsely populated high-desert and Rocky Mountain region and includes large areas of public land.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Moffat County, Colorado, the county’s population was 13,283 (April 1, 2020).

Age & Gender

The U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts profile provides county-level age and sex measures, including:

  • Persons under 18 years: 21.5%
  • Persons 65 years and over: 15.2%
  • Female persons: 46.5%
    (Male persons: 53.5%, calculated as the remainder)

Racial & Ethnic Composition

County-level race and ethnicity shares are reported in the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts profile (note: Hispanic/Latino is reported as an ethnicity and can overlap with race):

  • White alone: 92.1%
  • Black or African American alone: 0.6%
  • American Indian and Alaska Native alone: 1.2%
  • Asian alone: 0.5%
  • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone: 0.0%
  • Two or more races: 5.6%
  • Hispanic or Latino (of any race): 13.1%

Household & Housing Data

The U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts profile reports household and housing indicators including:

  • Households (2019–2023): 5,543
  • Persons per household (2019–2023): 2.37
  • Owner-occupied housing unit rate (2019–2023): 72.3%
  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units (2019–2023, dollars): $268,700
  • Median selected monthly owner costs with a mortgage (2019–2023, dollars): $1,462
  • Median gross rent (2019–2023, dollars): $1,025

For local government and planning resources, visit the Moffat County official website.

Email Usage

Moffat County’s large land area, dispersed settlement pattern, and rugged terrain around Craig contribute to higher last‑mile network costs and uneven service coverage, shaping how residents access email and other online communication. Direct county-level email usage statistics are not published; broadband and device access are standard proxies for potential email adoption.

Digital access indicators show how readily residents can use webmail or app-based email. County estimates on household computer ownership and broadband subscriptions are available from the U.S. Census Bureau (ACS), and connectivity context appears in NTIA broadband programs materials and Colorado’s Colorado Broadband Office resources.

Age distribution matters because older populations tend to have lower adoption of newer digital tools and may rely more on traditional communication; detailed county age breakdowns are also provided via the ACS. Gender distribution is generally less predictive of email adoption than age, income, and education; county sex distributions are available from the same source.

Infrastructure limitations in rural areas (distance to premises, terrain, and fewer providers) can reduce broadband availability and speed, constraining reliable email access, especially for attachment-heavy or multi-factor authentication workflows.

Mobile Phone Usage

Moffat County is in far northwestern Colorado (county seat: Craig) and is characterized by large land area, predominantly rural settlement patterns, and extensive public lands and high-desert terrain. These factors—long distances between population centers, mountainous or rugged topography in places, and low population density—tend to increase the cost and complexity of building dense cellular networks and can contribute to coverage gaps away from towns and major highways.

County context relevant to mobile connectivity

  • Rurality and settlement pattern: Population is concentrated in and around Craig, with smaller communities and dispersed residences elsewhere. This concentrates stronger mobile service in and near the main town while increasing the likelihood of weaker service in remote areas.
  • Terrain and land use: Varied terrain and large areas of federally managed land can limit tower siting options and require greater tower spacing, which reduces signal strength and capacity between sites.
  • Transportation corridors: In many rural counties, the most consistent coverage tends to follow highways and populated corridors rather than the full county footprint; Moffat County’s network experience commonly reflects this rural pattern, though exact corridor-level performance varies by carrier.

Primary sources for geography and population context include the U.S. Census Bureau’s county profiles via Census.gov (search “Moffat County, Colorado” for the latest population and density indicators).

Distinguishing “network availability” vs “adoption”

  • Network availability refers to whether mobile voice/data service is present in a location (coverage), and at what technology level (e.g., 4G LTE, 5G).
  • Adoption refers to whether households or individuals actually subscribe to mobile service or rely on mobile devices and mobile internet.

County-level adoption metrics are not always published specifically for mobile subscriptions; many datasets are reported at the state level or for broader geographies. The sections below separate what can be measured as availability from what is typically measured as household adoption.

Network availability in Moffat County (coverage and technology)

4G LTE availability

  • 4G LTE is generally the baseline mobile broadband layer across rural Colorado, including Moffat County, with strongest expected coverage near Craig and along primary roadways.
  • The most widely used public, location-specific reference for provider-reported coverage is the FCC’s broadband mapping program. The FCC map can be used to view mobile broadband availability by provider and technology in specific parts of the county: FCC National Broadband Map.
  • Limitation: FCC mobile coverage layers are based on provider submissions and modeled coverage; they indicate reported availability rather than guaranteed service quality indoors or in rugged terrain.

5G availability (where present, typically localized)

  • 5G availability in rural counties is often concentrated in or near population centers and may be limited outside towns. In Moffat County, the most defensible county-specific statement is that 5G availability must be verified on a location-by-location basis using carrier coverage tools or the FCC map rather than assumed countywide.
  • The FCC map provides technology indicators (including 5G) by location: FCC National Broadband Map.
  • Limitation: County-level summaries of 5G coverage quality (download/upload/latency distributions) are generally not published as definitive public statistics at the county scale.

Factors shaping availability (especially outside Craig)

  • Low density and large service area: Fewer towers cover larger areas, increasing the likelihood of weaker signals between sites and more variability in speeds.
  • Terrain: Hills, ridgelines, and canyon-like features can block or attenuate signal, affecting both 4G and 5G.
  • Backhaul constraints: Rural towers may rely on longer-distance fiber or microwave backhaul; where backhaul is limited, network capacity can be constrained even when coverage exists.

Household adoption and mobile access indicators (measured usage vs coverage)

Broadband subscription and device-based access (best-available public indicators)

  • The most common public indicator that approximates mobile-enabled internet access at local levels is the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS), which reports household internet subscription categories (including cellular data plan as a way a household accesses the internet).
  • County-level ACS tables can be accessed through data.census.gov by searching for Moffat County and “internet subscription” or “computer and internet use.”
  • Limitation: ACS internet subscription measures are household-reported and describe subscription types, not network performance. They also do not directly provide “mobile penetration” in the telecom-industry sense (active SIMs per 100 residents).

Clear separation of adoption vs availability

  • Availability: Verified through FCC coverage layers and carrier-reported maps (reported coverage presence).
  • Adoption: Reflected through ACS household subscription reporting (households reporting cellular data plans and other internet subscriptions), which indicates the extent to which residents rely on mobile data as an access method.

Mobile internet usage patterns (typical rural patterns; county-specific limits)

4G vs 5G usage

  • In rural counties, 4G LTE commonly serves as the primary mobile data technology because it is more broadly deployed geographically than 5G.
  • 5G usage tends to be higher where 5G coverage exists and where compatible devices are common; however, county-specific usage shares (percent of traffic on 5G vs 4G) are not generally available in public datasets for Moffat County.
  • The most authoritative public tool for confirming the presence of 4G/5G at a given location remains the FCC National Broadband Map, which focuses on availability rather than traffic patterns.

Home broadband substitution with mobile

  • Rural areas often show higher reliance on cellular data plans among households that lack fixed broadband options, but the extent of this substitution in Moffat County should be measured using ACS household internet subscription categories rather than inferred.
  • ACS tables on internet subscriptions (including cellular data plans) for Moffat County are accessible via data.census.gov.
  • Limitation: ACS does not indicate whether a cellular data plan is the household’s primary connection, nor does it capture data caps or service quality.

Common device types (smartphones vs other devices)

  • Smartphones are the dominant device type nationally for mobile access; however, county-specific device-type shares (smartphone vs basic phone vs hotspot-only devices) are not commonly published as official statistics at the county level.
  • The ACS provides local estimates on the presence of computing devices in households (desktop/laptop/tablet) and internet subscription types, but it does not provide a direct “smartphone share” for a county.
  • For county-level device/internet indicators, use data.census.gov and search for ACS tables related to “Computer and Internet Use.”
  • Limitation: Smartphone ownership is typically measured in national surveys (often not powered for reliable county-level estimates) rather than in county-specific official tabulations.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity

Geographic factors

  • Distance from towers and population centers: Households farther from Craig and other developed areas tend to experience weaker outdoor and indoor signal.
  • Topography: Signal obstruction by terrain can produce “shadowed” areas with limited service even when nearby areas have coverage.
  • Seasonal and recreation travel: Public lands and outdoor recreation can increase demand in remote areas where coverage is sparse, but public data generally reports availability rather than demand load.

Demographic factors (measured primarily through ACS and related Census products)

  • Age distribution, income, and housing characteristics can influence reliance on mobile-only internet and smartphone use, but the defensible way to describe these relationships locally is through county-specific ACS measures (e.g., age, income, poverty, housing occupancy) rather than generalization.
  • County demographic indicators are available from data.census.gov and overview profiles from Census.gov.
  • Limitation: Even where demographics are known, public datasets usually do not connect them directly to mobile technology generation (4G vs 5G) or device class at the county level.

Key public sources for Moffat County mobile connectivity

Data limitations specific to county-level mobile reporting

  • No standard county-level “mobile penetration” metric (SIMs per capita) is published as an official statistic for Moffat County in commonly used public datasets.
  • Public coverage data is modeled and provider-reported, and does not guarantee consistent indoor reception, capacity at peak times, or performance in complex terrain.
  • Device-type detail (smartphone vs basic phone vs hotspot) is not typically available as an official county statistic; household device and subscription proxies are available through ACS but do not directly measure smartphone penetration.

Social Media Trends

Moffat County is a rural county in northwest Colorado anchored by Craig (the county seat) and shaped by energy and extractive industries, outdoor recreation, and long travel distances between communities. Its lower population density and older age profile than Colorado overall are factors associated in national research with lower social media penetration and heavier reliance on mobile connectivity for day‑to‑day communication and local information sharing.

User statistics (penetration and active use)

  • County-specific social media penetration: Public, county-level estimates of “% of residents active on social platforms” are not routinely published by major survey programs; most reliable benchmarks are national/state-level surveys and demographic proxies.
  • National benchmark (adults): About 7 in 10 U.S. adults (≈69%) report using at least one social media site, according to Pew Research Center findings on U.S. social media use.
  • Implication for Moffat County: Given the county’s rural character and comparatively older age mix (both associated with lower adoption in national surveys), overall penetration is expected to track below Colorado’s metro areas and near or below the national adult average, with usage concentrated among working-age adults and younger residents.

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

National survey patterns are consistent and are commonly used to interpret rural-county use:

  • Highest use: 18–29 and 30–49 year-olds show the highest overall social media participation and the broadest multi-platform use in Pew’s 2023/2024 social media tables.
  • Middle: 50–64 year-olds participate widely but skew toward a narrower platform set (notably Facebook).
  • Lowest: 65+ adults have the lowest adoption rates and tend to concentrate on fewer platforms (again, primarily Facebook), a pattern that is especially relevant for rural places with older populations.

Gender breakdown

  • Overall pattern: Gender differences in “any social media use” are generally modest in national data, but platform choice differs by gender.
  • Platform-level differences: In Pew’s platform breakdowns, women are more likely than men to use Pinterest, while men are more likely than women to use YouTube in many survey waves; Facebook tends to be broadly used by both. See Pew Research Center’s platform-by-demographic results.

Most-used platforms (percentages where available)

Reliable platform percentages are best sourced from large national surveys:

How this typically maps to a rural county like Moffat (directionally):

  • Facebook tends to over-index as a local information utility (community pages, events, schools, public safety updates).
  • YouTube remains high due to broad entertainment and “how-to” utility across ages.
  • TikTok/Instagram skew younger; uptake is strongest among teens/young adults and households with robust mobile data access.
  • LinkedIn is usually lower in rural counties with smaller shares of office-based and large-firm employment compared with urban Colorado.

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)

  • Local-information use: Rural areas commonly use Facebook Groups/Pages for hyperlocal updates (weather, road conditions, school activities, community events), reinforcing frequent but short sessions rather than long-form posting.
  • Video-first consumption: High YouTube penetration supports “searchable video” behaviors (repairs, outdoor skills, news clips). Short-form video platforms (TikTok, Instagram Reels, YouTube Shorts) concentrate engagement among younger users.
  • Age-linked engagement: Older adults engage more through reading, commenting, and sharing on a small number of platforms (especially Facebook), while younger adults are more likely to maintain multiple accounts and engage with short-form video and messaging features.
  • Mobile-centered access: National research consistently shows heavy mobile access for social platforms, particularly in non-metro settings where fixed broadband availability and speeds can vary; this aligns with greater use of apps optimized for mobile video and messaging.

Sources used for quantitative platform/adoption benchmarks: Pew Research Center social media use report (2023).

Family & Associates Records

Family and associate-related records in Moffat County, Colorado, include vital records (birth and death), marriage and divorce records, and court-related family matters (such as adoption, guardianship, and protection orders). Birth and death certificates are created and maintained at the state level through the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE) and may also be processed locally through county public health services; certified copies are generally obtained via CDPHE or its approved vendor. Official state ordering information is provided through CDPHE Vital Records – How to Order a Certificate.

Marriage licenses are typically issued and recorded by the county clerk and recorder. Moffat County office contact and recording information is posted by the county at Moffat County, Colorado (official website) (navigate to Clerk & Recorder). Divorce decrees and adoption case files are maintained by the Colorado Judicial Department in the county court system; Moffat County court information and case access resources are listed at Colorado Judicial Branch – Moffat County. Statewide docket access is available through Colorado Courts – Docket Search.

Public databases for recorded documents and some court registers may be available online, while certified vital records are generally not fully public. Access commonly requires identity verification and payment of statutory fees. Adoption records and many juvenile/family case documents are restricted, and recent birth/death records are subject to state privacy rules.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

Marriage records

  • Marriage licenses and applications: Issued by the Moffat County Clerk and Recorder for marriages licensed in Moffat County.
  • Marriage certificates (certified copies): Recorded/maintained by the county after the license is returned and recorded. Certified copies are issued by the Clerk and Recorder.

Divorce and annulment records

  • Divorce decrees: Final orders issued by the Moffat County District Court in dissolution of marriage cases filed in Moffat County.
  • Annulments (decrees of invalidity): Court orders issued by the Moffat County District Court in cases seeking a declaration that a marriage is invalid under Colorado law.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

Marriage licenses and recorded marriage documents

  • Filing office: Moffat County Clerk and Recorder (Recording/Clerk functions for marriage licensing and recording).
  • Access:
    • In person: Requests for certified copies are handled through the Clerk and Recorder’s office.
    • By request (mail/other accepted methods): The Clerk and Recorder commonly provides certified copies upon completion of a request process and payment of statutory fees.
  • State-level alternative: Colorado maintains statewide vital records through the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), including verification/certified copies for eligible requesters.
    Link: Colorado Vital Records (CDPHE)

Divorce and annulment case records

  • Filing office: Moffat County District Court (Colorado Judicial Branch).
  • Access:
    • Court clerk’s office: Case files and copies of decrees are obtained through the district court clerk, subject to access rules and any sealing/restriction orders.
    • Online docket/case access: Colorado courts provide online access to case register information and some documents through state systems, with limitations for confidential or restricted records.
      Links: Colorado Judicial Branch, Court record access portals (via Colorado Judicial Branch)

Typical information included in these records

Marriage license / recorded marriage record

Common data elements include:

  • Full names of both parties
  • Dates of birth and ages (or affirmations of age)
  • Places of birth (often state/country) and current addresses (may vary by form/version)
  • Date and place of marriage
  • Officiant name/title and signature; witnesses (when required by the form used)
  • License issue date, license number, and recording information
  • Prior marital status information (often whether previously married and how ended)

Divorce decree (dissolution of marriage)

Common data elements include:

  • Caption (court, county, case number, party names)
  • Filing and decree dates; judge/magistrate signature
  • Findings regarding jurisdiction and statutory requirements
  • Orders addressing:
    • Property and debt division
    • Spousal maintenance (alimony), where applicable
    • Parenting time/decision-making and child support, where applicable
    • Name restoration (when requested)
  • Incorporation of a separation agreement or parenting plan, when applicable

Annulment (decree of invalidity)

Common data elements include:

  • Caption (court, county, case number, party names)
  • Findings supporting invalidity under Colorado law
  • Orders regarding status of the parties and, where relevant, property/financial issues and matters involving children
  • Judge/magistrate signature and entry date

Privacy or legal restrictions

Marriage records

  • Public access framework: Recorded marriage documents are generally treated as public records at the county level, but access to certified copies is commonly administered by the custodian office under Colorado public records and vital records practices.
  • Identity verification: Government-issued identification and request documentation are commonly required for certified copies, particularly when the office treats the record as a vital record for issuance purposes.

Divorce and annulment records

  • Public access with exclusions: Court case files are generally accessible, but Colorado court rules and statutes restrict access to certain information.
  • Confidential/restricted content: Financial source documents, protected addresses, Social Security numbers, detailed child-related evaluations, certain domestic violence-related information, and other protected data may be redacted, restricted, or filed under seal.
  • Sealing orders: Specific cases or documents may be sealed by court order; sealed materials are not available to the public except as permitted by the court.
  • Certified copies: The court clerk issues certified copies of decrees; fees and administrative requirements apply.

Practical distinctions between record custodians

  • Marriage licensing/recording: Maintained and certified by the Moffat County Clerk and Recorder for events licensed/recorded in Moffat County.
  • Divorce/annulment adjudication: Maintained by the Moffat County District Court as part of the court case file; decrees are court orders, not vital records maintained by the county clerk.

Education, Employment and Housing

Moffat County is in northwestern Colorado on the Utah border, anchored by the City of Craig and surrounded by large areas of public land and ranching/energy country. The county is rural, population-sparse outside Craig, and its economy has historically been tied to energy extraction and related services, alongside government, healthcare, and education. (For baseline demographics and geography, see the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts profile for Moffat County.)

Education Indicators

Public schools and school names

Public K–12 education is primarily served by Moffat County School District RE-1 (Craig-area). A current district-run list of schools is maintained on the Moffat County School District RE-1 website (school names can change due to reconfiguration; the district directory is the most authoritative source).

Data note: A single-district structure is typical for the county; school counts and names are best taken directly from the district directory because state/federal datasets often lag behind local changes.

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratio (public schools): The most consistently cited, comparable countywide ratio is available via the Census QuickFacts education section (which reports a public-school pupil/teacher measure drawn from national education datasets).
  • Graduation rate: Colorado’s official graduation outcomes are reported by the state. County residents are typically served by district and school graduation reporting available through the Colorado Department of Education (CDE) (graduation and dropout metrics are published annually at district and school levels).

Data note: Graduation rates are not reliably published as a single “county graduation rate” in all sources; the state’s district/school graduation files are the standard reference.

Adult educational attainment

Adult attainment is best summarized using the American Community Survey (ACS) as presented in:

  • QuickFacts (Moffat County) for headline attainment indicators such as high school graduate or higher and bachelor’s degree or higher.
  • data.census.gov (ACS table S1501: Educational Attainment) for detailed breakdowns.

Typical rural profile context: Moffat County’s attainment pattern generally aligns with many rural, energy-influenced counties in the region: high school completion is relatively high, while bachelor’s degree attainment is lower than statewide averages. The most recent ACS 5-year release on data.census.gov is the standard “most recent available” county estimate.

Notable programs (STEM, vocational, AP)

District-level offerings in rural counties commonly include:

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE)/vocational pathways (often aligned with skilled trades, business, health, and applied technology),
  • Advanced Placement (AP) and/or concurrent enrollment options for high school students,
  • STEM coursework integrated through middle/high school science, technology, and applied learning.

The authoritative, current program list is maintained in district materials (course catalogs, CTE pages, and school counseling documents) posted on the district site.

School safety measures and counseling resources

Colorado districts typically implement layered safety practices such as controlled building access, visitor management, emergency drills, coordination with local law enforcement, and student support frameworks. The district’s current safety practices and student support/counseling staffing are documented through district policy pages and school counseling pages on the Moffat County School District RE-1 website. State-level guidance and requirements are maintained by the Colorado Department of Education.

Data note: Specific counts of counselors, social workers, or psychologists are not consistently published in a single, countywide dataset; district staffing rosters and state district profile reports are the most direct sources.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year available)

The standard local measure is the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) series for Moffat County. The most recent monthly and annual averages are available via the BLS LAUS program (county-specific tables and time series).

Data note: County unemployment in rural, energy-linked areas can be volatile and is often best interpreted using annual averages or multi-year trends.

Major industries and employment sectors

The county’s largest and most characteristic sectors typically include:

  • Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction (including supporting activities),
  • Utilities and energy-related operations (regionally significant),
  • Government and public administration (including local government and public schools),
  • Healthcare and social assistance,
  • Retail trade and accommodation/food services (Craig as the service hub),
  • Construction and transportation/warehousing tied to regional supply chains.

Sector employment and earnings are most directly summarized in the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) county employment data and in ACS industry tabulations on data.census.gov.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

Occupational structure in Moffat County generally reflects a higher share of:

  • Production, transportation, and material moving occupations,
  • Construction and extraction occupations,
  • Installation, maintenance, and repair roles,
  • Alongside office/administrative support, education, healthcare support/practitioners, and sales/service roles centered in Craig.

The most comparable county estimates are from ACS occupation tables (e.g., S2401) on data.census.gov.

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

Commuting in Moffat County is typically characterized by:

  • Predominantly car/truck/van commuting, consistent with rural infrastructure and dispersed job sites,
  • A commuting pattern concentrated into Craig and to energy/industrial sites within the county and surrounding region.

Mean travel time to work and mode share are published in ACS commuting tables (e.g., S0801) on data.census.gov.

Local employment vs. out-of-county work

Rural counties with specialized industries often show notable in-county employment for residents, with some out-commuting to neighboring counties or across state lines depending on project cycles and job availability. The most direct measurement is the U.S. Census Bureau’s LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), which describes where workers live versus where they work.

Data note: LEHD/LODES is the standard source for resident-vs-workplace flow analysis; ACS provides supporting commuting characteristics but not as detailed for county-to-county flows.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership rate and rental share

Homeownership and renter shares are reported in ACS housing tables and summarized for the county via Census QuickFacts and detailed in ACS tables on data.census.gov. The county’s rural character typically corresponds to higher homeownership than dense urban counties, with rentals concentrated in Craig.

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median owner-occupied home value (ACS) is available through QuickFacts and detailed ACS tables on data.census.gov (e.g., DP04).
  • Recent trend context: County values tend to track a mix of statewide housing inflation and local employment cycles; energy-market changes can influence demand more strongly than in Colorado’s metro counties.

Data note: ACS values are medians based on survey responses and are not the same as assessed values used for taxation.

Typical rent prices

Typical rent levels are captured in ACS as median gross rent (DP04 and related tables) on data.census.gov, with a headline figure also commonly shown on QuickFacts. Rentals are most common in Craig, with more limited apartment supply in outlying areas.

Types of housing

Housing stock in Moffat County is generally composed of:

  • Single-family detached homes (dominant in Craig and rural areas),
  • Manufactured homes/mobile homes (a common rural component),
  • Small multifamily buildings and apartments (primarily in Craig),
  • Rural lots and acreage properties outside the city.

These shares are quantified through ACS housing-structure tables (DP04) on data.census.gov.

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools or amenities)

  • Craig functions as the county’s primary neighborhood and service center, with the closest proximity to schools, the hospital/clinics, grocery retail, and civic services.
  • Outlying communities and rural subdivisions typically involve longer driving distances to schools and amenities, reflecting the county’s low density and large land area.

Data note: Neighborhood-level metrics are not consistently available countywide in a single public dataset; city planning documents and school attendance boundary maps provide the most direct local detail.

Property tax overview (average rate and typical homeowner cost)

Colorado property taxes are driven by assessed value, assessment rates, and local mill levies. For county-specific levy and assessment information:

  • The most direct local reference is the Moffat County government (assessor/treasurer resources), which provides assessed value processes and tax collection details.
  • Colorado’s statewide property tax structure and assessment rates are summarized by the Colorado Department of Revenue.

Data note: A single “average property tax rate” can be misleading because mill levies vary by location and taxing district (school, fire, special districts). Typical homeowner tax cost is best approximated from county assessor summaries (median/average tax bill reports where published) rather than a single statewide rate.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Colorado