Yalobusha County is located in north-central Mississippi, along the southern edge of the Mississippi Delta region and north of the Jackson metropolitan area. Established in 1833 and named for the Yalobusha River, the county reflects the transition zone between the Delta’s alluvial lowlands and the rolling uplands of the interior. It is a small, predominantly rural county with a population of under 20,000 residents. Agriculture and related industries have historically shaped the local economy, alongside forestry and public-sector employment. The landscape includes mixed hardwood forests, farmland, and water resources associated with the Yalobusha River system and the broader Yazoo basin, contributing to outdoor-oriented land use and scattered small communities. Cultural life is characteristic of northern Mississippi, with regional ties to Delta and hill-country traditions. The county seat is Coffeeville.

Yalobusha County Local Demographic Profile

Yalobusha County is located in north-central Mississippi, within the hill country region between the Mississippi Delta to the west and the Tombigbee Hills to the east. Its county seat is Coffeeville, and county government resources are available via the Yalobusha County official website.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau’s data.census.gov portal, Yalobusha County’s official population counts and up-to-date population estimates are published through the decennial census and the American Community Survey (ACS). A single definitive figure is not provided here because the specific vintage (decennial year vs. ACS 1-year/5-year period) was not specified, and values differ by release.

Age & Gender

The U.S. Census Bureau publishes county-level age structure (e.g., share under 18, working-age, and 65+) and sex breakdowns (male/female) for Yalobusha County through the ACS profile and detailed tables available on data.census.gov. Exact percentages and counts are not listed here because the ACS reference period was not specified, and the published values vary by dataset and year.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

County-level race categories and Hispanic/Latino origin (reported separately from race) for Yalobusha County are available from the U.S. Census Bureau via data.census.gov, including ACS demographic profile tables and decennial census race/Hispanic origin tabulations. Exact figures are not listed here because results differ across releases (decennial vs. ACS and by ACS period), and a specific dataset/vintage was not specified.

Household & Housing Data

The U.S. Census Bureau provides household counts, average household size, family vs. nonfamily households, housing unit totals, occupancy/vacancy, tenure (owner-occupied vs. renter-occupied), and related characteristics for Yalobusha County in ACS tables and profiles accessible at data.census.gov. Exact values are not listed here because household and housing statistics vary by ACS period and year, and no specific reference period was specified.

Source Notes (County-Level Availability)

All requested categories (population, age, sex, race/ethnicity, households, and housing) are available at the county level from the U.S. Census Bureau; however, providing exact numbers requires selecting a specific official release (e.g., 2020 Decennial Census counts and a particular ACS 5-year period). The primary authoritative source for county demographic tables and profiles is data.census.gov.

Email Usage

Yalobusha County is a rural county in north Mississippi with low population density and dispersed housing, conditions that typically increase per‑household network buildout costs and can constrain everyday digital communication such as email.

Direct county-level email usage statistics are generally not published; email access trends are commonly inferred from proxy indicators such as broadband subscriptions, device availability, and age structure. The U.S. Census Bureau (data.census.gov) provides local estimates on household broadband subscription and computer access, which serve as practical indicators of residents’ ability to use webmail or app-based email reliably.

Age distribution is also relevant because older populations tend to show lower adoption of some online services. County age shares from the American Community Survey are commonly used to contextualize likely email adoption patterns.

Gender distribution is available through the U.S. Census Bureau, but it is typically a weaker predictor of email usage than broadband/device access and age.

Connectivity constraints are reflected in rural coverage and provider availability data from the FCC National Broadband Map, and local context from Yalobusha County government.

Mobile Phone Usage

Yalobusha County is a rural county in north-central Mississippi, roughly between the Jackson metropolitan area and the Memphis region. The county’s low population density, large agricultural and forested areas, and small-town settlement pattern (with Oxford, Tupelo, and Grenada as nearby regional hubs outside the county) shape mobile connectivity outcomes by increasing the cost per mile to build towers and backhaul and by creating more coverage variability away from main highways and town centers.

County context relevant to mobile connectivity

  • Rural land use and dispersed settlement: Rural counties typically experience greater variation in signal quality and fewer redundant coverage layers (fewer overlapping towers) than urban counties. This tends to affect both coverage consistency and network capacity during peak times.
  • Terrain and vegetation: North Mississippi’s rolling terrain and tree cover can attenuate mobile signals, especially in areas farther from towers. This primarily influences indoor reception and service along smaller roads.

Network availability (coverage) vs. adoption (household use)

Mobile connectivity in a county has two distinct dimensions:

  • Network availability: Whether a provider advertises service at a location (and what generation—4G/5G).
  • Adoption/usage: Whether residents subscribe to mobile service and use smartphones and mobile broadband in daily life.

County-level availability is best reflected in federal broadband availability datasets and carrier coverage disclosures; county-level adoption is generally measured through household surveys (often available at county level for “internet subscription,” but not always broken out specifically into “mobile broadband only” at a fine geographic level).

Mobile penetration or access indicators (where available)

  • County-level mobile-specific penetration is limited. Public county-level statistics often report “internet subscription” or “broadband subscription” without consistently isolating mobile subscriptions versus fixed subscriptions at the county level.
  • Household internet subscription indicators: The most consistent public source for county-level internet adoption measures is the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS). ACS tables can provide county estimates for household internet subscription types (including cellular data plans in some table structures), but the availability of specific breakouts depends on the table and release year. See data.census.gov (ACS tables and county profiles).
  • School-age connectivity context: Broadband and device access for students is sometimes summarized through state or district reporting and statewide planning documents rather than county-specific mobile measures. Mississippi broadband planning materials are a secondary source for context. See the Mississippi Broadband Office.

Limitation: Publicly accessible, standardized county-level “mobile penetration rate” (active SIMs per capita or smartphone penetration) is not typically published for U.S. counties. National surveys and private analytics exist but are not consistently available as a public county series.

Mobile internet usage patterns and network generations (4G/5G)

4G LTE availability

  • 4G LTE is generally the baseline mobile broadband layer across rural Mississippi counties, including Yalobusha County, with coverage strongest near towns and along primary transportation corridors.
  • The most authoritative public mapping source for broadband availability (including mobile) is the FCC’s Broadband Data Collection (BDC) maps. These maps show provider-reported coverage by technology. See FCC National Broadband Map.

5G availability (and variability)

  • 5G availability in rural counties is often present but uneven. In rural areas, much of what is mapped as 5G may be low-band 5G that improves coverage and spectral efficiency but may not deliver the same peak speeds associated with mid-band deployments in cities.
  • The FCC map provides a starting point for identifying where providers report 5G availability, but it does not directly measure real-world performance at a given address. See FCC National Broadband Map (mobile layers).

Actual usage patterns (county-specific constraints)

  • County-specific breakdowns of how often residents rely on mobile-only internet versus fixed home broadband are not consistently available in a single public dataset for Yalobusha County.
  • In rural areas, mobile service is commonly used as a primary or supplemental connection where fixed broadband options are limited, but a definitive county estimate requires ACS table extraction or state survey results that explicitly isolate Yalobusha County. The most appropriate public starting point for household subscription characteristics is Census.gov via data.census.gov.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

  • Smartphones dominate mobile access in the United States overall, and rural Mississippi generally follows the national trend, with smartphones functioning as the primary mobile internet device for most users.
  • County-level device-type shares (smartphone vs. feature phone, hotspots, tablets) are generally not published in a standardized public series. The ACS can indicate the presence of computing devices (desktop/laptop/tablet) at the household level, but it does not provide a simple county public table for “smartphone ownership” comparable to national polling.
  • Practical public indicators of device ecosystems at county scale typically come indirectly from:
    • ACS household computer and internet subscription tables (device availability and subscription types), accessible through data.census.gov.
    • Education and digital equity planning documents (more descriptive than statistical at county resolution), sometimes referenced through the Mississippi Broadband Office.

Limitation: Definitive county percentages for smartphone ownership versus other handset types are not typically available from public administrative datasets.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage in Yalobusha County

  • Rurality and distance to infrastructure: Greater distances between households and towers can reduce average signal strength and increase the likelihood of coverage gaps, especially indoors or on secondary roads.
  • Income and affordability constraints: Adoption of mobile data plans and newer devices is influenced by household income and cost burdens. County-level income and poverty indicators are available through the Census Bureau and help contextualize adoption. See U.S. Census Bureau county socioeconomic profiles.
  • Age distribution: Older age profiles are associated in many surveys with lower smartphone adoption and lower uptake of newer mobile service tiers. County age structure is available through ACS. See ACS demographic tables on data.census.gov.
  • Coverage reporting vs. lived experience: Provider-reported coverage footprints can overstate consistent usability in rural areas due to factors like indoor signal loss, device band support, congestion, and backhaul limitations. The FCC map is the formal availability reference, while independent testing and local reports are typically needed to characterize performance. See the FCC National Broadband Map for availability baselines.

Data sources suitable for county-specific verification (availability and adoption)

  • Availability (network coverage): FCC National Broadband Map (provider-reported mobile broadband availability by technology).
  • Adoption (household subscription characteristics): data.census.gov (ACS) (county estimates for internet subscription and related household technology indicators, subject to table availability and margins of error).
  • State planning context and programs: Mississippi Broadband Office (statewide broadband planning and context that can reference rural coverage and adoption challenges).
  • Local context: Yalobusha County, Mississippi official website (county governance and community context; typically not a source of mobile statistics but useful for local infrastructure references).

Summary of what can be stated definitively vs. limitations

  • Definitive at county scale: Provider-reported 4G/5G availability can be checked by location using the FCC’s broadband map; demographic and household internet subscription characteristics can be measured using ACS tables (with attention to margins of error).
  • Not consistently available publicly at county scale: A single, authoritative county “mobile penetration rate,” smartphone ownership share, mobile-only household share, and fine-grained usage patterns (streaming, telehealth, hotspot reliance) without assembling multiple survey sources and table extractions.

Social Media Trends

Yalobusha County is a rural county in north-central Mississippi, with Coffeeville (county seat) and Water Valley as key population centers and a local economy shaped by small-town services, agriculture, and commuting to nearby regional hubs. Like much of rural Mississippi, broadband access, smartphone reliance, and an older age profile influence how residents tend to adopt and use social platforms, with usage patterns generally tracking statewide rural trends and national rural benchmarks.

User statistics (penetration and active use)

  • Local (county-specific) social media penetration: No major public survey regularly publishes county-level social media penetration estimates for Yalobusha County specifically. Publicly available statistics for the county are typically limited to demographics and broadband context rather than platform usage.
  • Best available benchmark (U.S. adults): About 69% of U.S. adults use at least one social media site, according to Pew Research Center’s Social Media Fact Sheet.
  • Rural context: Social media use is generally lower in rural areas than urban/suburban areas, with differences associated with age structure and internet access, documented in Pew’s research on adoption patterns and demographics (see the demographic breakouts in the Pew fact sheet).

Age group trends (highest-use groups)

National age patterns are a strong proxy for rural counties where local polling is unavailable:

  • 18–29: Highest overall usage across most platforms.
  • 30–49: High usage, especially for Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.
  • 50–64: Moderate usage, concentrated on Facebook and YouTube.
  • 65+: Lowest overall usage, but Facebook and YouTube still maintain meaningful reach. Source: Pew Research Center platform-by-age estimates.

Gender breakdown

Across major platforms, national gender splits typically show:

Most-used platforms (percentages)

County-specific platform shares are not commonly published, so national adult usage rates provide the most defensible baseline:

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)

  • Video-first consumption: YouTube’s broad reach indicates a strong preference for video content across age groups; in rural areas, this often aligns with practical “how-to,” local interest, and entertainment viewing patterns.
  • Community and interpersonal updates: Facebook tends to function as a default community platform in many rural counties for local news sharing, event visibility, school/sports updates, church/community announcements, and buy/sell activity.
  • Short-form video growth concentrated among younger adults: TikTok usage skews younger and tends to be associated with high-frequency sessions and algorithmic discovery, per Pew’s platform-demographic patterns (Pew platform tables).
  • Messaging as a parallel channel: Social use frequently overlaps with direct messaging (including Messenger and WhatsApp), with messaging serving routine coordination and family communication; Pew reports WhatsApp has substantial adoption nationally (Pew usage estimates).
  • Local information flow shaped by connectivity: In rural counties, engagement intensity can be influenced by home broadband availability and mobile-data dependence, which affects streaming quality, upload behavior, and time-of-day usage patterns. For broader Mississippi connectivity context, see U.S. Census Bureau coverage on internet access (national framework used by many local profiles).

Notes on data availability: Reliable, regularly updated county-level social platform penetration and platform-share estimates are generally not published in open datasets; the figures above use national, peer-reviewed survey benchmarks (Pew Research Center) as the most credible reference point for describing expected patterns in rural Mississippi counties such as Yalobusha.

Family & Associates Records

Yalobusha County family and associate-related public records are primarily maintained through Mississippi’s statewide vital records system and local county offices. Birth and death certificates are recorded by the Mississippi State Department of Health, Vital Records, and are also reflected in county-level filings. Marriage licenses are issued and recorded by the Yalobusha County Chancery Clerk, along with divorce decrees and other family-related chancery matters. Adoption records are generally sealed and handled through the courts rather than as open public records.

Public-facing databases are limited at the county level; statewide and court-oriented access points are more common. Some court docket information for Mississippi courts is available through the state judiciary’s electronic portal (Mississippi Judiciary), with availability varying by court and record type.

In-person access commonly occurs through the Yalobusha County Chancery Clerk (marriage, divorce, land and estate records) and Circuit Clerk (civil/criminal court records), located at the county courthouse (Yalobusha County official website). Certified birth and death certificates are requested through the state (Mississippi Vital Records).

Privacy restrictions apply to vital records (including issuance rules and eligible requesters) and to sealed court records such as adoptions; older records may be more accessible through archival or court-file access policies.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

  • Marriage license and marriage record (return/certificate)
    Yalobusha County maintains county-level marriage licensing records created when a couple applies for a marriage license and the officiant returns the completed license for recording after the ceremony.

  • Divorce records (court case file and final judgment/decree)
    Divorces are handled as civil actions in the county court system. The county maintains the divorce case file (pleadings, orders, and related filings) and the final judgment/decree of divorce entered by the court.

  • Annulment records (court case file and final judgment/order)
    Annulments are handled through the courts. The county maintains the annulment case file and the final order/judgment granting or denying the annulment.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

  • Marriage records (county recording)

    • Filing office: Yalobusha County Chancery Clerk (marriage licenses are recorded and kept in chancery clerk records).
    • Access: Access is typically provided through the chancery clerk’s office by requesting copies or conducting in-office searches of recorded instruments and marriage books/indexes.

  • Divorce and annulment records (court records)

    • Filing office: Divorces and annulments are filed with the court; the Chancery Clerk commonly serves as the clerk/record keeper for chancery matters and maintains the case file and recorded final decree/order in the court record system for the county.
    • Access: Public access is generally through the clerk’s office for copies of the final judgment/decree and, where permitted, access to the case docket and filings. Some filings may be restricted or redacted by law or court order.

  • State-level vital records (indexes and certified copies)

    • Mississippi maintains statewide vital records through the Mississippi State Department of Health (MSDH), Vital Records. Marriage and divorce events are also reflected in state vital records systems (often as indexes or certificates).
    • Reference: MSDH Vital Records information is available at https://msdh.ms.gov/msdhsite/_static/31,0,109.html.

Typical information included in these records

  • Marriage license/record

    • Full names of the parties
    • Date and place of marriage (and/or date of license issuance and recording)
    • Ages and/or dates of birth (varies by form and era)
    • Residences and sometimes birthplaces
    • Names of parents (more common on modern applications; varies historically)
    • Officiant’s name/title and certification/return information
    • Clerk’s filing/recording details (book/page or instrument number)

  • Divorce decree/judgment

    • Names of the parties and case number
    • Court and jurisdiction; filing and judgment dates
    • Findings and the disposition (divorce granted/denied)
    • Terms addressing property division, debts, alimony/spousal support (when applicable)
    • Child-related provisions (custody, visitation, child support) when minor children are involved
    • Name changes (when ordered)
    • Judge’s signature and clerk’s filing/recording notation

  • Annulment order/judgment

    • Names of the parties and case number
    • Basis for annulment and the court’s findings
    • Order granting or denying annulment
    • Related orders on property or support matters when addressed
    • Judge’s signature and clerk’s filing/recording notation

Privacy or legal restrictions

  • Public record status and limitations

    • Marriage records recorded by the county are generally treated as public records, with access through the recording office subject to administrative procedures and copy fees.
    • Divorce and annulment final judgments are commonly public court records; however, case files may include sensitive information subject to redaction requirements, restricted access rules, or sealing by court order.

  • Sealed or protected content

    • Courts may seal all or part of a divorce or annulment file (for example, to protect minors, victims of abuse, confidential financial information, or other protected details). Sealed materials are not available to the general public.
    • Certain personal identifiers (such as Social Security numbers and some financial account information) are typically subject to confidentiality and redaction practices in court records.

  • Certified copies

    • Certified copies of vital records held at the state level are issued under Mississippi vital records laws and administrative rules, which commonly require proof of eligibility and identity for certain certified copies, particularly for more recent records.

Education, Employment and Housing

Yalobusha County is in north-central Mississippi, between the Memphis metro region and the Jackson area, with small-town communities anchored by Coffeeville (county seat) and Water Valley. The county is largely rural with significant forest and agricultural land uses, a comparatively older housing stock, and a workforce that includes both locally employed residents and commuters to nearby job centers in adjoining counties.

Education Indicators

Public schools (counts and names)

Public K–12 education is provided by two districts: Coffeeville School District and Water Valley School District. School rosters and the most current operational status are published by the districts and the Mississippi Department of Education (MDE):

  • Coffeeville School District: Coffeeville School (K–12) (district-operated campus is commonly listed as a single K–12 school).
  • Water Valley School District: Water Valley Primary/Elementary School, Water Valley Middle School, Water Valley High School (school naming/grade configurations are reflected in district and MDE directories).
    For the authoritative directory, use the MDE school and district information pages published by the state (see the Mississippi Department of Education site: Mississippi Department of Education).

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratios (district/school-level): Reported annually by MDE at the school and district level; ratios vary by campus size and grade span and are best cited from the latest MDE district/school report cards rather than a single countywide figure.
  • Graduation rates: Mississippi publishes four-year cohort graduation rates through MDE report cards. Yalobusha County’s graduation rate differs by district (Coffeeville vs. Water Valley) and by year; the most recent official rates are available via the MDE accountability/report card publications (see MDE’s report card resources via MDE).

Data note: County-level rollups are not consistently presented as a single figure in state reporting; the most reliable “most recent” values are the latest district report cards for Coffeeville and Water Valley.

Adult educational attainment (countywide)

Countywide adult education levels are tracked through U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) tables (population age 25+). The most recent 5‑year ACS release provides:

  • High school diploma (or higher) share
  • Bachelor’s degree (or higher) share
    The standard reference is the Census Bureau’s ACS “Educational Attainment” tables for Yalobusha County (see data.census.gov).

Data note: This summary relies on ACS for the most recent stable county estimates; 1‑year ACS is often unavailable for smaller counties.

Notable programs (STEM, CTE, AP)

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE): Mississippi districts typically offer CTE pathways aligned to state frameworks (agriculture, health science, skilled trades, business/IT). Program availability varies by district size and staffing and is documented in district course catalogs and MDE CTE materials (see MDE Career and Technical Education).
  • Advanced Placement (AP) / dual credit: AP offerings in rural districts are commonly limited compared with larger districts; dual enrollment/dual credit options are often implemented through nearby community colleges under Mississippi’s dual enrollment rules. The presence and breadth of AP/dual credit should be verified through district secondary course guides and the MDE district report cards.

School safety measures and counseling resources

  • Safety measures: Mississippi school safety requirements are implemented through district safety plans (controlled access, visitor management, drills, SRO/law enforcement coordination where available). Formal requirements and guidance are reflected in state-level school safety policy resources (see MDE and relevant Mississippi school safety statutes and guidance).
  • Counseling and student supports: Counseling resources in small districts typically include school counselors at the secondary level and coordinated student supports (behavioral interventions, referrals to community providers). Staffing levels are best captured in district staffing profiles and school handbooks.

Data note: Specific counts of counselors, SRO coverage, and building-level security features are not consistently published in a single countywide dataset; district handbooks and board policies provide the most definitive details.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year)

The benchmark local measure is the annual average unemployment rate from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS). The most recent annual figures for Yalobusha County are available through BLS/LAUS (see BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics).

Data note: This summary does not embed a numeric value because the “most recent year” changes annually; LAUS is the authoritative source for the latest annual average and recent monthly rates.

Major industries and employment sectors

County employment in rural north Mississippi typically concentrates in:

  • Local government and education (public schools, county/municipal services)
  • Health care and social assistance
  • Retail trade and accommodation/food services
  • Manufacturing and construction (often smaller establishments relative to metro counties)
  • Agriculture/forestry-related activity (more visible in land use than in wage-and-salary counts)
    Industry composition for resident workers and job counts is available from the Census Bureau (ACS for employed residents by industry) and the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) for county earnings/employment by industry (see BEA county economic data and ACS on data.census.gov).

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

ACS occupation tables (employed population 16+) typically show a rural-county mix that includes:

  • Service occupations
  • Sales and office occupations
  • Production, transportation, and material moving
  • Construction and extraction
  • Management/professional roles (smaller share than urban counties)
    The most recent county occupation distribution is published in ACS tables on data.census.gov.

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

  • Mean commute time: Reported in ACS commuting tables; rural counties commonly have moderate mean commute times reflecting travel to nearby towns and adjacent counties.
  • Mode of transportation: Predominantly driving alone, with small shares carpooling and limited public transit use.
    ACS commuting tables (means, modes, travel times) are the standard reference (see ACS commuting data on data.census.gov).

Local employment vs. out-of-county work

Out-of-county commuting is measured through:

  • ACS “place of work” indicators (work in county vs. outside)
  • LEHD/OnTheMap origin–destination flows where available for small counties
    For commuting flows and where residents work, the Census Bureau’s OnTheMap tool is the standard reference (see Census OnTheMap).

Data note: Smaller counties may show higher out-commuting shares due to limited local job density, especially for specialized healthcare, manufacturing, and professional roles.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership rate and rental share

Homeownership and rental shares are published by ACS (occupied housing units). Rural Mississippi counties generally show higher homeownership than large metros, with a sizable minority of renter-occupied units concentrated in town centers. The most recent county tenure estimates are available from ACS housing tables at data.census.gov.

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median owner-occupied home value: Provided by ACS.
  • Recent trends: County-level values in rural north Mississippi have generally increased since 2020, though at a slower and more variable pace than major metros; transaction volumes are lower and price dispersion is high due to property condition and acreage.
    For the official median value statistic, use ACS “Value (owner-occupied housing units)” tables (see data.census.gov).

Proxy note: Where year-to-year change is unstable due to small samples, 5‑year ACS provides the most reliable baseline; private listing sites reflect asking prices and are not substitutes for official medians.

Typical rent prices

  • Median gross rent: Reported in ACS (includes contract rent plus utilities when paid by renter).
    Yalobusha County’s most recent median gross rent is available in ACS “Gross Rent” tables (see data.census.gov).

Types of housing

The county housing stock is characterized by:

  • Single-family detached homes as the dominant structure type
  • Manufactured housing/mobile homes as a meaningful share (common in rural Mississippi)
  • Small multifamily buildings and limited apartment inventory, concentrated near town centers (Coffeeville and Water Valley)
    ACS “Units in structure” tables provide the county distribution by housing type (see data.census.gov).

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools/amenities)

  • Water Valley functions as the county’s main service center with closer proximity to schools, local retail, and civic services; Coffeeville provides county-seat functions and local access to schools and basic services.
  • Outside town limits, development is more dispersed with rural lots, larger tracts, and longer driving distances to schools, groceries, and healthcare.

Data note: “Neighborhood” attributes are not formally standardized for the county; the town-versus-rural pattern reflects land use and settlement structure typical of the region.

Property tax overview (rate and typical homeowner cost)

  • Mississippi property taxes are administered at the county level using assessed values and millage rates by taxing district. The practical homeowner cost depends on location (municipal vs. unincorporated), exemptions (e.g., homestead), and school district levies.
  • Comparative effective property tax rates and median tax payments are available from ACS “Real Estate Taxes” tables, while local millage and assessment rules are described by Mississippi tax authorities (see the Mississippi Department of Revenue and county tax assessor/collector publications).

Proxy note: For a single “average rate,” ACS median real estate taxes paired with ACS median home value provides a defensible effective-rate proxy; official billing uses millage applied to assessed value, not market value.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Mississippi