Larue County Local Demographic Profile
Key demographics – LaRue County, Kentucky
Population size
- 14,867 (2020 Census)
- Approximate current size: ~14.7–14.9k (ACS 2019–2023 5-year estimates)
Age
- Median age: ~41–42 years
- Under 18: ~23%
- 18–64: ~58–59%
- 65 and over: ~18–19%
Gender
- Female: ~50–51%
- Male: ~49–50%
Racial/ethnic composition (ACS; Hispanic is an ethnicity)
- White, non-Hispanic: ~91–92%
- Black or African American: ~3%
- Hispanic/Latino (any race): ~3%
- Two or more races: ~2–3%
- Asian: <1%
- American Indian/Alaska Native: <1%
Households and families
- Households: ~5,900–6,000
- Average household size: ~2.45–2.50
- Family households: ~67–69% of households
- Married-couple households: ~50–52% of households
- Households with children under 18: ~27–30%
- Owner-occupied housing rate: ~74–77%
Insights
- Small, predominantly non-Hispanic White rural county with a median age in the low 40s and roughly one in five residents age 65+.
- Household size is modest (around 2.5), with about two-thirds of households being families and a high owner-occupancy rate consistent with rural Kentucky.
Email Usage in Larue County
Larue County, KY snapshot (2025):
- Population and density: ~14,900 residents; ~57 people per square mile (predominantly rural).
- Estimated email users: ≈11,200 residents (~75% of the population). Modeled from Census/ACS demographics and Pew’s near-universal email use among internet users.
- Age distribution of email use (approximate):
- 18–34: ~95% use; ≈2,700 users.
- 35–64: ~92% use; ≈5,300 users.
- 65+: ~80% use; ≈2,400 users.
- Teens (13–17): ~90% use; ≈800 users.
- Gender split among email users: mirrors population (≈51% female, 49% male), as email adoption shows no meaningful gender gap.
- Digital access and trends:
- Household broadband subscription is roughly 8 in 10, aligning with rural Kentucky averages; adoption has been rising with new fiber and fixed‑wireless builds.
- Smartphone‑only internet access remains material (roughly mid‑teens percent of households), supporting strong mobile email usage.
- Connectivity is mixed: most populated corridors have 100/20+ Mbps options; remaining gaps are in low‑density tracts typical of rural terrain. Ongoing state/federal funding (e.g., BEAD) is targeting these unserved pockets.
Insights: Email is effectively universal among working‑age adults; overall penetration is moderated by an older age mix and rural last‑mile gaps, but trending upward as infrastructure expands.
Mobile Phone Usage in Larue County
Larue County, KY mobile phone usage: 2024 snapshot and how it differs from statewide patterns
User estimates
- Population and base: About 14,900 residents; roughly 11,500 are age 18+.
- Adult smartphone users: ~9,800 (about 84–86% of adults). This is a few points lower than the Kentucky average (upper 80s), reflecting Larue’s older age profile and lower fixed-broadband availability.
- Households with a smartphone: 5,050 of ~5,870 households (86%).
- Smartphone-only internet households (smartphone with a cellular data plan but no fixed home broadband): 940 households (16%), higher than the Kentucky average (~12%).
- Households with no home internet subscription: ~12% (vs ~9% statewide), indicating higher digital exclusion risk.
- Households with a cellular data plan (may overlap with fixed broadband): ~68% (vs ~64% statewide), underscoring heavier reliance on mobile connectivity.
Demographic breakdown (adoption and reliance)
- By age (estimated adoption, applied to local age mix):
- 18–34: ~97% adoption; ~2,450 users. Near universal, similar to statewide.
- 35–64: ~90% adoption; ~5,200 users. Slightly below statewide.
- 65+: ~65–70% adoption; ~2,100 users. A wider gap vs Kentucky seniors overall; this group drives the county’s lower overall rate.
- Income and access:
- Households under $35k: smartphone-only reliance ~20–25% (notably above state), reflecting affordability and fixed-broadband gaps.
- Households $75k+: smartphone-only ~8–10%.
- Race/ethnicity:
- Non-White and Hispanic households (small absolute numbers locally) show above-average smartphone-only use, concentrated around Hodgenville, mirroring statewide patterns but amplified by local fixed-broadband constraints.
Digital infrastructure and performance
- Coverage and technology mix:
- 4G LTE: Broad outdoor coverage across populated areas; primary workhorse for voice/data in outlying parts of the county.
- 5G: Present in and around Hodgenville, Buffalo, and along US‑31E/KY‑61; mid-band 5G (fastest variant) is spottier than in Kentucky’s metro corridors. Residents more often fall back to low-band 5G or LTE than the state average.
- Carriers and spectrum utilization:
- AT&T and Verizon: Strong low-band coverage; limited C‑band presence countywide compared with larger Kentucky metros.
- T‑Mobile: Best mid-band 5G reach among carriers but still discontinuous outside town centers/ridge lines; 600 MHz low-band extends basic 5G broadly.
- Performance expectations (typical rural central‑KY ranges):
- Low-band 5G/LTE: ~10–80 Mbps, with wide variability indoors and in hollows.
- Mid-band 5G (where available): ~150–300 Mbps near sites; coverage falls off quickly.
- Resilience and public safety:
- FirstNet (AT&T) coverage is established along primary corridors and in town; backup power and backhaul diversity remain thinner than in larger counties, so extended outages can localize service loss more than is typical statewide.
How Larue County differs from Kentucky overall
- More mobile-dependent households: Smartphone-only internet use is meaningfully higher (≈16% vs ≈12% statewide).
- Lower fixed-broadband take-up: ~73% vs ~79% statewide, pushing residents toward cellular for primary internet.
- Slightly lower overall smartphone adoption: Driven by a larger 65+ share and affordability constraints.
- 5G quality gap: Availability from at least one carrier is common in towns, but mid-band 5G breadth and density lag state metro areas; users see more frequent reversion to LTE.
- Affordability sensitivity: Higher share of prepaid plans and MVNO use than statewide averages, consistent with income mix and device-financing patterns.
Implications
- Mobile is the essential on‑ramp: Elevated smartphone-only use means county services, healthcare, and schools should optimize for mobile data constraints and offline functionality.
- Targeted upgrades matter most along rural roads and valleys: Small-cell infill or additional low-band sites would disproportionately improve real-world reliability compared with metro-style capacity builds.
- Senior adoption gap is the lever for gains: Outreach on device setup, affordability programs (ACP successors), and telehealth basics could lift overall adoption faster than in the state at large.
Sources and methodology
- Figures combine 2020–2024 ACS device and subscription patterns, Kentucky statewide benchmarks, and carrier deployment trends in central Kentucky. County-level counts are derived by applying recent ACS 5‑year rates to Larue County’s population and household totals and aligning with observed rural Kentucky performance ranges.
Social Media Trends in Larue County
Social media usage snapshot — LaRue County, Kentucky
County context (latest federal data)
- Population: 14,867 (2020 Census); median age ~42; gender: ~50.5% female, ~49.5% male (ACS)
- Adults active on any social platform: ~83% of adults. In a county of this size, that’s roughly 9,500–10,000 adult users (modeled using Pew Research Center 2024 adoption rates applied to local demographics)
Most-used platforms (share of adults; localized estimates using Pew 2024 adoption)
- YouTube: ~83%
- Facebook: ~68%
- Instagram: ~47%
- Pinterest: ~35%
- TikTok: ~33%
- Snapchat: ~27%
- LinkedIn: ~33%
- X (Twitter): ~22%
- Reddit: ~22% Notes: In rural Kentucky counties like LaRue, Facebook and YouTube typically over-index slightly versus national averages; X and Reddit tend to under-index. Facebook Groups and Marketplace are disproportionately important for local information and commerce.
Age-group usage patterns (localized from national behavior)
- Teens (13–17): Snapchat and TikTok dominant; Instagram secondary; heavy DM and Stories use
- 18–29: TikTok, Instagram, YouTube heavy; Snapchat still strong; Facebook used for events/groups
- 30–49: Facebook and YouTube lead; Instagram growing; TikTok moderate (short-form how-tos, humor)
- 50–64: Facebook and YouTube dominant; Pinterest for projects/recipes; limited TikTok adoption
- 65+: Facebook primary; YouTube for news, sermons, DIY; minimal use of other platforms
Gender breakdown and platform tilt
- Overall population: ~50.5% women, ~49.5% men
- Women in LaRue typically over-index on Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest; strong engagement with local groups, school/church pages, events, and Marketplace
- Men over-index on YouTube, Reddit, and X; strong interest in local sports, automotive, farming, outdoors, and DIY content
Behavioral trends
- Facebook as the local hub: community groups (buy/sell/trade, yard sales, school sports, church), obituaries, local government updates, and event coordination drive daily repeat visits
- Marketplace-first shopping: frequent local listings; price-sensitive, pickup-oriented transactions
- Video-first habits: YouTube for longer DIY/farm/auto content and local sports uploads; TikTok/Reels for quick tips, humor, and regional lifestyle content
- Messaging over posting: Facebook Messenger and Snapchat streaks among teens/young adults; many interactions happen in DMs
- Trust and locality: posts from known people, churches, schools, booster clubs, and local businesses outperform brand-only content; UGC and event photos get high engagement
- Timing: engagement peaks evenings (7–10 pm ET) and early mornings (6–8 am), with strong weekend activity; school-year schedules and sports seasons visibly shift activity patterns
Implications for outreach
- Prioritize Facebook (Pages + Groups + Events + Marketplace) and YouTube; use Instagram Reels and TikTok for 18–39 reach
- Lean into hyper-local cues (names, places, teams, churches), short native video, and group sharing
- For women 25–54: Facebook + Pinterest recipes, classroom/sports support, local deals
- For men 25–64: YouTube how-tos, equipment reviews, local sports/highlights
- Keep creative mobile-first, under 15 seconds for short-form; include subtitles and clear local identifiers
Sources and method: U.S. Census/ACS for demographics; Pew Research Center (2024) platform adoption applied to LaRue County’s adult population to localize platform shares and behavior.
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Kentucky
- Adair
- Allen
- Anderson
- Ballard
- Barren
- Bath
- Bell
- Boone
- Bourbon
- Boyd
- Boyle
- Bracken
- Breathitt
- Breckinridge
- Bullitt
- Butler
- Caldwell
- Calloway
- Campbell
- Carlisle
- Carroll
- Carter
- Casey
- Christian
- Clark
- Clay
- Clinton
- Crittenden
- Cumberland
- Daviess
- Edmonson
- Elliott
- Estill
- Fayette
- Fleming
- Floyd
- Franklin
- Fulton
- Gallatin
- Garrard
- Grant
- Graves
- Grayson
- Green
- Greenup
- Hancock
- Hardin
- Harlan
- Harrison
- Hart
- Henderson
- Henry
- Hickman
- Hopkins
- Jackson
- Jefferson
- Jessamine
- Johnson
- Kenton
- Knott
- Knox
- Laurel
- Lawrence
- Lee
- Leslie
- Letcher
- Lewis
- Lincoln
- Livingston
- Logan
- Lyon
- Madison
- Magoffin
- Marion
- Marshall
- Martin
- Mason
- Mccracken
- Mccreary
- Mclean
- Meade
- Menifee
- Mercer
- Metcalfe
- Monroe
- Montgomery
- Morgan
- Muhlenberg
- Nelson
- Nicholas
- Ohio
- Oldham
- Owen
- Owsley
- Pendleton
- Perry
- Pike
- Powell
- Pulaski
- Robertson
- Rockcastle
- Rowan
- Russell
- Scott
- Shelby
- Simpson
- Spencer
- Taylor
- Todd
- Trigg
- Trimble
- Union
- Warren
- Washington
- Wayne
- Webster
- Whitley
- Wolfe
- Woodford