Bracken County

Do you want the latest American Community Survey 5-year estimates (most current for small counties) or the 2020 Decennial Census counts? Also, which household metrics matter most to you (e.g., number of households, average household size, family vs. nonfamily share)?

Bracken County, KY snapshot (estimates)

• Scale and density: 8.3k residents across ~200 sq mi (40 people/sq mi). Population clustered in Augusta and Brooksville, with long, sparsely populated road miles.
• Email users: ~4.9k–5.3k adults use email regularly. Method: ~6.3–6.7k adults × ~85% internet adoption in rural areas × ~92% email use among online adults (Pew, 2023–2024).
• Age pattern (share using email):
  • 18–29: ~75–80% (heavy mobile-first use; email for school/work sign-ins)
  • 30–49: ~90–95% (work, commerce, parenting logistics)
  • 50–64: ~85–90%
  • 65+: ~65–75% (growing as telehealth and banking move online)
• Gender split: Approximately even (near 50/50 among users).
• Digital access trends:
  • Home broadband: ~70–75% of households (rural-typical); growing via fiber and fixed wireless builds along main corridors, slower on remote roads due to low density.
  • Smartphone ownership: ~80% in rural areas; 10–15% of adults are “smartphone-only” for internet.
  • Public Wi‑Fi at the county library, schools, and some businesses supplements access, especially for homework and telehealth.
• Connectivity context: Hilly terrain and dispersed addresses increase last‑mile costs and can leave gaps in cable/DSL and cellular coverage outside town centers, but overall access and speeds have been improving year over year.

Below is a pragmatic, estimate-based snapshot of mobile phone usage in Bracken County, Kentucky, with emphasis on how it differs from statewide patterns. Figures are derived from recent Census demographics, rural adoption research, and typical rural network build patterns; use them as planning-grade ranges, not point estimates.

Executive summary

• Population baseline: ~8,300–8,600 residents, heavily rural, older than Kentucky overall.
• Estimated mobile users: 6,200–6,800 individuals with active mobile lines; 5,000–5,500 are smartphone users. Another ~600–800 cellular-connected devices (tablets, hotspots, LTE home routers) are likely in service.
• Key differences from Kentucky overall: slightly lower smartphone adoption, higher reliance on prepaid/MVNO and mobile-only internet households, slower 5G mid-band availability, more LTE fallback and coverage gaps away from highways/river towns.

User estimates

• Adults with any mobile phone: ~5,900–6,400 (roughly 92–96% of adults).
• Adult smartphone users: ~4,700–5,200 (roughly 78–86% of adults; a few points below Kentucky’s urban/suburban counties).
• Teens (13–17) with smartphones: ~450–550 (roughly 85–95% of that age group).
• Children (5–12) with a phone/watch: ~150–250.
• Non‑phone cellular devices (hotspots, LTE home internet CPE, tablets, watches): ~600–800 lines.

Demographic factors and usage patterns

• Older age structure: A larger 65+ share than the state average depresses smartphone and app adoption. Expect 60–70% smartphone ownership among seniors (vs. higher statewide), more voice/SMS reliance, and slower upgrade cycles.
• Income and plan mix: Median household income is below the Kentucky median. This correlates with:
  • Higher prepaid and MVNO usage.
  • Greater sensitivity to data caps and promotional pricing.
  • Elevated participation in affordability programs historically; the ACP wind‑down has likely pushed some households to downgrade plans or go mobile‑only for home internet.
• Platform split: Android likely edges out iPhone (roughly 55–60% Android) due to price sensitivity; statewide urban areas skew more evenly or slightly iPhone‑leaning.
• Mobile-only households: Estimated 18–22% rely on mobile data or fixed wireless in lieu of wireline broadband, a higher share than the state average.
• Apps and services: Heavy Facebook/Messenger usage; practical adoption of telehealth and school apps exists but lags younger/urban counties due to device age, data constraints, and coverage variability.

Digital infrastructure and coverage

• Macro sites and density: Sparse rural density; expect on the order of 10–14 macro cell sites serving ~200+ square miles, with additional small cells rare. Coverage is strongest along:
  • AA Highway (KY 9/10) and other primary corridors.
  • Ohio River towns (e.g., Augusta) and the county seat (Brooksville).
• Technology mix:
  • 4G LTE: Broad outdoor coverage from AT&T, Verizon, and T‑Mobile along corridors and towns; interior hollows/ridge lines see weaker signals and indoor issues.
  • 5G: Low‑band “nationwide” 5G is present on most carriers but behaves like enhanced LTE. Mid‑band 5G (e.g., T‑Mobile n41, Verizon/AT&T C‑band) is likely limited to highway/river corridors and town centers; many areas still fall back to LTE.
• Backhaul: Combination of microwave and limited fiber; Kentucky’s statewide middle‑mile (KentuckyWired) provides nearby anchor points, with fiber to schools, libraries, and public facilities, but last‑mile fiber to homes remains spotty.
• Fixed wireless/home internet: T‑Mobile 5G Home and Verizon 5G/4G Home are viable along corridors and in towns; they are more hit‑or‑miss in interior areas. WISPs may serve pockets using unlicensed or CBRS spectrum.
• Public safety and resilience: FirstNet (AT&T) presence along main corridors; volunteer EMS/fire coverage needs create pressure for fill‑in sites. Power/ice events can isolate valleys; sites with limited fiber backhaul or backup power are more vulnerable.
• Roaming and cross‑river effects: Along the Ohio River, device performance sometimes benefits from sightlines to towers in Ohio; deeper interior depends strictly on Kentucky sites.

How Bracken differs from Kentucky overall

• Lower smartphone penetration: By roughly 5–8 percentage points versus Kentucky’s metro-heavy average, driven by age and income mix.
• More prepaid/MVNO usage: Cost sensitivity and ACP lapse effects produce a higher share of budget plans and plan churn.
• Higher mobile-only internet dependence: More households substitute mobile or fixed wireless for wired broadband than the statewide average.
• Slower 5G experience: Mid‑band 5G coverage is spottier; users more often fall back to LTE, especially indoors and away from corridors.
• Coverage gaps: Terrain (valleys, river bluffs) and low tower density create more dead zones than in many Kentucky counties closer to Louisville–Lexington–NKY urban cores.
• Device mix and upgrade cadence: Slightly older devices in circulation; Android share higher; upgrade cycles longer.
• Business and ag usage: Mobile point‑of‑sale and field-data use are growing but constrained by coverage inside metal buildings and in low‑lying areas; reliance on offline-capable apps is higher.

Planning implications and near-term outlook

• Backhaul and fiber expansion funded through state/federal programs should improve tower capacity and enable broader mid‑band 5G between 2025–2028, but carrier investment will likely prioritize corridors first.
• Targeted infill sites or repeaters in known shadow zones (schools, clinics, fairgrounds, fire stations) can yield outsized reliability gains.
• Affordability remains a gating factor; without a long‑term ACP replacement, expect continued prepaid shift and cautious data usage behaviors.
• For service rollouts, prioritize AA Highway and river-town nodes first, then extend along school bus routes and emergency response corridors to maximize benefit.

Notes on methodology

• Population and age structure based on recent ACS/Census ranges for Bracken County; adoption rates reflect rural U.S. and Kentucky-adjacent studies through 2024.
• Coverage characterizations synthesize FCC map tendencies, carrier band deployments in rural Kentucky, and standard rural tower densities; exact tower counts and 5G bands vary by site.

Social media usage in Bracken County, KY (2025 snapshot)

Note: County-level platform data isn’t directly published. Figures below are modeled from national platform adoption (Pew Research Center 2024), rural-versus-urban usage gaps, and Bracken County’s age structure (ACS), scaled to ~8.5K residents. Treat as directional ranges.

Headline user stats

• Residents 13+: ~7.3–7.6K
• Social-media users (use at least one platform monthly): ~4.8–5.8K (65–78% of 13+)
• Internet access: ~80–85% regular access; ~10–15% are smartphone‑only users

Age mix among active social users (share of social users)

• 13–17: 8–10%
• 18–29: 16–20%
• 30–49: 34–38%
• 50–64: 24–28%
• 65+: 12–16%

Gender breakdown among active social users

• Female: 52–55%
• Male: 45–48%

Most‑used platforms (monthly reach; share of residents 13+)

• YouTube: 65–75%
• Facebook: 60–70%
• Instagram: 25–35%
• TikTok: 25–32%
• Pinterest: 22–30% (skews female)
• Snapchat: 18–25% (teens/young adults)
• X (Twitter): 7–12%
• LinkedIn: 8–12%
• Reddit: 7–10%
• Nextdoor: <5%

Behavioral trends and platform notes

• Facebook: Daily habit for 30+; heaviest for local groups (schools, churches, yard sales), weather/emergency updates, Marketplace. Younger users lean on Messenger more than posting.
• YouTube: Strong across ages; how‑to, farming, hunting/fishing, auto/DIY, local sports highlights. Growing smart‑TV viewing in households.
• Instagram: 18–34 focus; Reels outperform photos; cross‑posted content from Facebook is common.
• TikTok: Fast growth with teens and 18–34; local humor, small‑business promos, event recaps; discovery via geo‑tags and local hashtags.
• Snapchat: Primary chat/story tool for teens and 18–24.
• Pinterest: Recipes, home projects, crafts, weddings; useful for local retailers and service pros with blog content.
• X (Twitter) and Reddit: Niche audiences (regional news/sports, hobbyist communities); lower local posting volume.
• LinkedIn: Small but useful for professional services and hiring specialized roles.

Engagement patterns

• Peak times: Weeknights 7–10 pm; weekend mornings; spikes during school sports seasons and severe weather.
• Content that works: Faces and local stories (kids/schools, high‑school sports), community events, deals/limited offers, weather‑related service tips, before/after visuals, short vertical video under 30–45s.
• Calls to action: “Message us” tends to outperform “Call now.”
• Trust signals: Feature local staff/customers, tag locations (Brooksville, Augusta, Germantown), and participate in active Facebook Groups.
• Ads: Tight geo‑targeting (10–15 miles), boosted posts, message/lead ads on Facebook/Instagram; keep video files small for variable rural connectivity.