Franklin County

Franklin County is located in southeastern Idaho along the Utah state line, centered on the Cache Valley and adjoining the Bear River range and surrounding foothills. Created in 1913 from Oneida County, it developed as an agricultural and small-town region tied to settlement in the broader Intermountain West. The county is small in population, with roughly 14,000 residents, and includes a network of rural communities and a few small population centers. Its landscape combines irrigated valley farmland with mountain terrain, supporting an economy based on farming, livestock, food processing, and local services, with some commuting to nearby regional hubs in Idaho and Utah. Cultural life reflects longstanding Latter-day Saint settlement patterns and a strong emphasis on community institutions typical of rural southeastern Idaho. The county seat and largest city is Preston.

Franklin County is located in southeastern Idaho along the Utah border, within the Cache Valley region. The county seat is Preston; local government information is available on the Franklin County official website.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts (Franklin County, Idaho), Franklin County had:

• Population (2020): 14,194
• Population (2023 estimate): 14,043

Age & Gender

According to the U.S. Census Bureau data portal (data.census.gov) (ACS 5-year profiles for Franklin County), county-level age and sex are reported through standard tables such as ACS DP05 (ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates). The most commonly cited summary measures include:

• Age distribution: reported by detailed age brackets (under 5 through 85+), plus summary indicators such as median age and percent under 18 / 65+ (available in DP05 for Franklin County).
• Gender ratio: reported as percent male and percent female (available in DP05 for Franklin County).

For an official, county-specific breakdown, use Franklin County geography in data.census.gov and select DP05 under “American Community Survey (ACS)” profiles.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

According to U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts (Franklin County, Idaho), the county’s race and Hispanic/Latino origin are published as shares of the total population (including categories such as White, Black or African American, American Indian and Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, Two or More Races, and Hispanic or Latino). QuickFacts presents these as percentage distributions for Franklin County based on Census and ACS updates.

Household & Housing Data

According to U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts (Franklin County, Idaho), Franklin County household and housing indicators are published at the county level, including:

• Households and persons per household
• Owner-occupied housing rate
• Median value of owner-occupied housing
• Median selected monthly owner costs (with/without mortgage)
• Median gross rent
• Building permits and housing unit totals

More detailed household composition (family vs. nonfamily households, household size distribution, and presence of children) is available through the U.S. Census Bureau’s data.census.gov tables for Franklin County (ACS 5-year), including DP02 (Selected Social Characteristics) and related detailed tables.

Franklin County, Idaho is largely rural and low-density, so longer last‑mile distances and mountainous terrain can constrain wired buildouts and make residents more reliant on available fixed wireless or mobile options for digital communication.

Direct county-level email-usage statistics are not routinely published; email access is typically inferred from household connectivity and device availability. The U.S. Census Bureau (ACS) data portal provides county indicators such as broadband subscriptions and computer ownership, which serve as proxies for the practical ability to use email at home.

Age structure influences adoption because older populations tend to have lower rates of broadband/device use and lower uptake of online services; Franklin County’s age distribution can be reviewed via ACS demographic tables. Gender differences are generally secondary for email access compared with age, income, and connectivity; county sex composition is available from the same ACS sources.

Connectivity constraints are reflected in coverage gaps and provider availability documented in the FCC National Broadband Map, which helps identify areas where infrastructure limitations may reduce consistent email access.

Franklin County is in southeastern Idaho along the Utah border, with its largest population center in the Cache Valley around Preston and extensive surrounding agricultural and mountain terrain (including portions of the Bear River Range). The county’s low population density and significant topographic variation (valleys separated by foothills and mountains) are relevant to mobile connectivity because coverage and performance typically concentrate along highways and settled valley floors while becoming more variable in higher-elevation and less-populated areas. Basic county geography and population context are available from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Franklin County QuickFacts.

Data availability and limitations (county-specific vs. modeled estimates)

County-level statistics that directly quantify “mobile penetration” (for example, the share of residents with a mobile subscription) are not consistently published for every county in a single official series. As a result, county-specific adoption indicators are most often derived from:

• Household survey tables that measure telephone service characteristics (often at the county level for “wireless-only” households in some releases, but not uniformly available for all counties every year).
• Broadband availability maps that model where service is offered (not the same as adoption).
• Program and mapping datasets focused on “broadband” rather than “mobile subscriptions,” sometimes reported at census block or location level and then summarized.

The distinction between network availability (service is advertised/technically available) and household adoption (people subscribe and use it) is especially important in rural counties.

Network availability (coverage) in Franklin County

Mobile broadband (4G LTE and 5G) availability

Primary official source (availability): The Federal Communications Commission publishes modeled mobile broadband coverage from provider filings. The most direct public interface is the FCC National Broadband Map, which includes layers for mobile 4G LTE and 5G (with options such as 5G NR and provider-specific views). This dataset describes where providers report coverage and does not measure real-world speeds at a specific address or actual subscription rates.

General availability patterns in a county like Franklin (based on how FCC mobile layers are structured, not on county-specific performance testing) are typically characterized by:

• Higher reported LTE/5G availability along transportation corridors and within/near Preston and other settled valley communities, where cell density is greatest.
• More variable availability in mountainous terrain and sparsely populated agricultural areas, where line-of-sight constraints and fewer towers can reduce consistency, especially off major roads.

State planning context: Idaho’s statewide broadband planning and mapping resources are published by the Idaho Broadband Office. These materials often focus on fixed broadband and location-based service but provide context on rural connectivity challenges relevant to mobile coverage as well.

Emergency and public-safety connectivity context

Local terrain and winter conditions can affect the practical reliability of mobile connectivity for travelers and residents in less-populated areas. County-level emergency management and local government context is typically published through the Franklin County, Idaho official website, though it does not function as a technical coverage map.

Household adoption (subscriptions and use): what can be measured

Household phone access indicators (wireless vs. landline)

County-level “mobile penetration” is often approximated using household telephone service characteristics such as:

• Wireless-only households (no landline; mobile phones are the only telephone service).
• Households with both wireless and landline.
• Households with no telephone service.

These indicators are commonly derived from Census Bureau survey products and related telephone-status tables when available at county geography. The most accessible starting point for county data is the Census.gov QuickFacts page for Franklin County, which links to underlying American Community Survey (ACS) profiles and tables. However, not all ACS releases present telephone-service detail at county level in a consistent way across years, and some telephone-service statistics are published through specialized series (often national/state-focused) rather than uniformly for all counties. Where county-level wireless-only estimates are not published for Franklin in a given release, the limitation is that adoption must be inferred from broader geographies (state or multi-county region), which does not uniquely describe Franklin County.

Mobile internet adoption vs. availability

• Availability is represented by FCC/provider coverage filings (where service is offered).
• Adoption (whether households subscribe to mobile data plans and rely on them) is not directly measured by the FCC availability layers and must be estimated using survey-based measures (device ownership, internet subscription type, and household connectivity status) when those are available at county geography.

For internet subscription characteristics (including cellular data plans as an access mode in some tables), the Census Bureau’s ACS is the main federal survey source; table availability at the county level varies by year and table type.

Mobile internet usage patterns in Franklin County (4G/5G context)

4G LTE

4G LTE is the baseline mobile broadband technology across most U.S. counties and is generally expected to be the most geographically extensive layer in FCC mobile availability data. For Franklin County, the FCC map is the definitive reference for provider-reported LTE availability by location: FCC mobile broadband availability layers.

5G

5G availability is typically more localized than LTE in rural counties, with:

• Strongest reported availability near population centers and major routes.
• Reduced continuity in rugged or less-served terrain.

The FCC map provides the most direct way to distinguish reported 5G availability from LTE in the county: FCC National Broadband Map (5G layers). The FCC map reflects provider filings and should not be interpreted as a guarantee of indoor coverage or consistent performance across all devices.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

What is directly measurable

Device-type prevalence (smartphones vs. basic phones, hotspots, tablets) is usually measured through:

• National and state surveys (often not county-granular).
• Market research (not typically open-data at county level).
• Indirect indicators such as broadband subscription type and household computing device ownership (where available from Census survey tables).

At the county level, there is no single official, consistently updated public dataset that enumerates smartphone share specifically for Franklin County. As a result, definitive county-level smartphone-vs-feature-phone percentages are generally not available from FCC availability data or standard county profiles.

Practical implications for rural counties

Even without county-specific device-share statistics, rural usage patterns commonly involve:

• Smartphones as the primary personal access device for internet and communications.
• Mobile hotspots and fixed wireless as supplements where fixed wired broadband is limited in outlying areas.

These statements describe typical U.S. rural connectivity patterns; they do not constitute a quantified Franklin County device-share estimate.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage in Franklin County

Settlement pattern and commuting corridors

Franklin County’s population is concentrated in and near towns in the valley (notably Preston), with lower-density areas outside town limits. This concentration affects:

• Tower placement and capacity, which tends to prioritize higher-demand areas.
• Coverage continuity along main roads versus backroads and mountainous areas.

Population and housing distribution context is available from Census.gov county QuickFacts.

Terrain and elevation

Mountainous terrain and canyons can attenuate signals and create coverage gaps or reduced indoor reception, while valley floors typically allow broader propagation from fewer sites. This factor is structural (geographic) and influences the difference between:

• Reported availability (coverage polygons)
• Experienced connectivity (signal strength and usable throughput in specific micro-locations)

Rural broadband alternatives and substitution

In rural counties, households may substitute mobile service for fixed service (wireless-only households) or rely on mobile data when fixed broadband options are limited at the edge of provider footprints. Adoption measurement for this substitution effect depends on telephone-service and internet-subscription survey tables; where Franklin-specific tables are unavailable, only state-level substitution patterns can be cited without asserting county values.

Summary: availability vs. adoption in Franklin County

• Network availability (4G/5G): Best measured via provider-reported coverage on the FCC National Broadband Map; this indicates where mobile broadband is offered, not whether residents subscribe or what speeds they receive.
• Household adoption (mobile access/usage): County-level adoption indicators require survey tables (Census/ACS telephone and internet subscription characteristics) and are not uniformly available for Franklin County in a single, consistently published county series. The most reliable starting point for county demographic and household context is Census.gov QuickFacts, with statewide broadband context from the Idaho Broadband Office.

Franklin County is in southeastern Idaho along the Utah border, with Preston as the county seat and a largely rural, agriculture‑oriented economy. Its dispersed settlement pattern and strong ties to nearby regional hubs (including Logan, Utah) tend to support heavy reliance on mobile internet and community-based Facebook/Marketplace activity for local news, commerce, and events.

User statistics (local availability and best proxies)

• County-specific “% active on social media” measures are not routinely published in major public datasets. The most defensible approach is to use national benchmarks and apply them as context for a rural Idaho county.
• U.S. adult social media use (benchmark): About 7 in 10 U.S. adults use at least one social media site, according to Pew Research Center’s Social Media Fact Sheet.
• Rural context affecting penetration: Social media adoption is generally slightly lower in rural areas than urban/suburban areas, while smartphone ownership remains high enough to sustain broad access; these patterns are summarized in Pew’s work on internet and technology adoption (see Pew Research Center Internet & Technology research).

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

Using Pew’s national age patterns as the most reliable proxy for Franklin County:

• 18–29: Highest usage; Pew reports very high participation among this group across major platforms (especially Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok).
• 30–49: High usage, often spanning Facebook, YouTube, Instagram; typically strong participation in local/community groups.
• 50–64: Moderate-to-high usage, with Facebook and YouTube commonly leading.
• 65+: Lowest overall usage, but Facebook and YouTube remain the most common among users.
  Source: Pew Research Center social media use by age.

Gender breakdown (overall and by platform)

• Overall social media use by gender: Pew generally finds men and women are similarly likely to use social media overall, with clearer differences showing up at the platform level rather than in total use.
• Platform-skew patterns (national):
  • Women are more likely than men to use Pinterest and often Facebook.
  • Men are more likely than women to use Reddit and some discussion/community platforms.
  • Instagram and TikTok are frequently closer to parity, with variation by age.
    Source: Pew Research Center platform-by-demographic tables.

Most-used platforms (percentages from national survey data)

County-level platform shares are not reliably published; the following are U.S. adult rates commonly used as a baseline for local context:

• YouTube: ~83% of U.S. adults
• Facebook: ~68%
• Instagram: ~47%
• Pinterest: ~35%
• TikTok: ~33%
• LinkedIn: ~30%
• Snapchat: ~27%
• X (formerly Twitter): ~22%
• WhatsApp: ~29%
• Reddit: ~22%
  Source: Pew Research Center Social Media Fact Sheet (latest reported figures in the fact sheet tables).

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and local-use implications)

• Community information exchange tends to concentrate on Facebook in rural counties: local groups, church/community announcements, school/sports updates, and buy/sell activity (Marketplace) align with Facebook’s strength in place-based networks; this matches broader U.S. patterns in how Facebook is used for community and local groups.
• Video-first consumption is structurally important: With YouTube as the top-reach platform nationally (Pew), rural users often lean on video for how-to content, entertainment, and local-interest viewing, especially where fewer in-person or local media options exist.
• Age-driven platform split: Younger adults concentrate more time on TikTok/Instagram/Snapchat, while older adults skew toward Facebook/YouTube; this age gradient is one of the most consistent findings in U.S. surveys (Pew).
• Messaging and “closed” sharing: Direct messaging and private groups are prominent across platforms; Pew research on digital communication frequently notes that many interactions occur in smaller-audience settings rather than public posting (see Pew’s broader Internet & Technology coverage).

Franklin County, Idaho family-related public records primarily include vital records (birth and death certificates) administered at the state level by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Bureau of Vital Records and Health Statistics (Idaho Birth, Marriage, and Death Records). Certified copies are generally requested through the state’s ordering system; Franklin County offices may provide local guidance but do not typically serve as the official custodian for certified birth/death certificates.

Family and associate-related court records, including divorce, child custody/guardianship matters, probate, and some adoption-related case files, are filed with the local court. Access to case information is available through the Idaho Supreme Court’s statewide portal (Idaho iCourt Portal) and in person at the Franklin County Courthouse/Clerk of the District Court (Franklin County, Idaho (official site)).

Public databases commonly include court case indexes via iCourt and recorded-property instruments via the County Recorder (deeds and related filings), which can reference family/associate relationships in legal documents. Record access occurs online through the relevant state portal and in person through the courthouse and county offices.

Privacy restrictions apply to many family records. Birth certificates and adoption records are generally restricted, while many court dockets and recorded documents are public with redactions or sealed cases as required by court rule and state law.

Types of records available

Marriage records

• Marriage licenses and marriage certificates/returns: Issued by the county clerk and recorded after the officiant completes and returns the certificate portion.
• Marriage record indexes: Many county offices maintain internal indexes to recorded marriage instruments.

Divorce records

• Divorce decrees (final judgments): Part of the civil court case file maintained by the district court.
• Divorce case files: Typically include pleadings, orders, findings, and the final decree.

Annulment records

• Annulment decrees (judgments of annulment): Also handled as a district court matter and maintained in the district court case file.
• Annulment case files: Generally include the petition/complaint, orders, findings, and final judgment.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

Franklin County marriage records (local recording)

• Filed/recorded with: Franklin County Clerk (often functioning as the county recorder for recorded instruments, including marriage records).
• Access: Requests are commonly handled through the clerk’s office for certified copies and/or record searches. Recorded marriage records are generally county-level vital/recorded documents.

Idaho marriage records (state-level vital records)

• Filed with: Idaho Bureau of Vital Records and Health Statistics (state repository for vital records).
• Access: Certified copies are issued under Idaho vital records laws and administrative rules.
  Reference: Idaho Department of Health and Welfare – Vital Records

Franklin County divorce and annulment records (court records)

• Filed with: The District Court serving Franklin County (part of Idaho’s judicial district structure). Divorce and annulment are district court matters.
• Access:
  • Court clerk access: Case files and copies are requested through the district court clerk’s office for the county.
  • Online docket/case access: Idaho courts provide statewide online access to certain case information, subject to redaction and access rules.
    Reference: Idaho iCourt Portal

Typical information included in these records

Marriage licenses/certificates

Common data elements include:

• Full names of the parties
• Date and place of marriage (ceremony location)
• Date the license was issued and license number
• Officiant name/title and certification/attestation
• Names of witnesses (when recorded)
• Ages or dates of birth (varies by form/era)
• Residences and/or places of birth (varies by form/era)

Divorce decrees and case files

Common data elements include:

• Names of the parties and case number
• Filing date and date of final decree
• Court findings and orders, which may address:
  • Dissolution of the marriage
  • Child custody/visitation (when applicable)
  • Child support (when applicable)
  • Spousal maintenance/alimony (when applicable)
  • Division of property and debts
  • Name change orders (when applicable)

Annulment decrees and case files

Common data elements include:

• Names of the parties and case number
• Grounds/findings supporting annulment
• Date of judgment
• Related orders (custody/support/property) when applicable

Privacy or legal restrictions

Marriage records

• Public record vs. certified copy controls: Basic marriage information is often treated as a public record at the county level, while certified copies and state-held vital records copies are issued under Idaho vital records eligibility and identification requirements.
• Identity verification and eligibility: The state vital records office limits issuance of certified copies to eligible requesters under Idaho law and rules, and requires acceptable identification.

Divorce and annulment records

• Court record access rules: Divorce and annulment files are court records, but access is governed by Idaho court rules and confidentiality statutes.
• Confidential information restrictions: Certain information is restricted or redacted, commonly including Social Security numbers, minor children’s identifying information, and protected addresses. Some filings or exhibits may be sealed by court order.
• Online access limitations: Public online portals typically display limited case information and exclude confidential documents or fields, consistent with court access policies.

References for access policies:

• Idaho iCourt Portal (statewide case access)
• Idaho Vital Records (certified vital records access)

Franklin County is in southeastern Idaho along the Utah border, anchored by the small city of Preston and surrounded by agricultural valleys and rural towns. The county’s population is small and predominantly rural, with community life organized around local schools, farming- and trade-linked employment, and regional commuting to nearby job centers in Idaho and northern Utah.

Education Indicators

• Public school system (schools and names)
  Franklin County is primarily served by Preston School District #201. A current, official list of district schools (including names and grade configurations) is maintained on the Preston School District website and its board/administration materials; school rosters can also be cross-checked via the Idaho State Department of Education’s “School Directory” resources. (School-name counts fluctuate with consolidations and program changes, so district/state directories are the most reliable “most recent” source.)
  Sources: Idaho State Department of Education (school/district directories), Preston School District #201.

• Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates (most recent available)
  County-specific student–teacher ratios and graduation rates are typically reported at the district and high-school level rather than as a county aggregate. The most consistent “most recent” reporting is published through Idaho’s statewide accountability/report card systems and district/state reporting pages.
  Proxy note: When county-level ratios are not published, district-level ratios for Preston SD 201 and high school graduation rate reporting for the district’s high school serve as the standard proxy for the county’s public school system.
  Sources: Idaho State Department of Education (reporting and accountability pages), Preston School District #201.

• Adult educational attainment (countywide)
  The most recent, standard countywide measures come from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates (county level):

  • High school diploma (or higher), age 25+: reported via ACS table series on educational attainment.
  • Bachelor’s degree (or higher), age 25+: reported via the same ACS series.
    Source: U.S. Census Bureau (data.census.gov).

• Notable programs (STEM, career/technical, AP/dual credit)
  Idaho public high schools commonly participate in Career & Technical Education (CTE) pathways (ag mechanics, business, health-related pathways, trades, and applied technology), and many districts offer dual credit via Idaho higher-education partners. Advanced Placement (AP) availability is school-specific and is most reliably confirmed through the high school course catalog and counseling office publications.
  County proxy: program availability is best represented by Preston SD 201 secondary-school course catalogs and Idaho CTE participation.
  Sources: Idaho Career & Technical Education, Preston School District #201.

• School safety measures and counseling resources
  Idaho districts generally maintain required safety plans (emergency operations procedures, visitor management, drills) and provide school counseling at the secondary level, with additional student support through multi-tiered interventions. District-level documentation (student handbooks and board policies) provides the most current local description of safety practices and student services.
  Sources (policy and safety practice context): Idaho State Department of Education, Preston School District #201.

Employment and Economic Conditions

• Unemployment rate (most recent year available)
  The most current county unemployment figures are published through the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (LAUS) and disseminated by the Idaho Department of Labor. Franklin County’s unemployment rate is typically reported as an annual average and as monthly/seasonally adjusted series.
  Source: Idaho Department of Labor (labor market information), BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics.

• Major industries and employment sectors
  The county’s employment base is characteristically agriculture and agriculture-adjacent manufacturing, plus education, health services, retail, and local government. In southeastern Idaho rural counties, food processing, transportation/warehousing, and construction commonly represent major employment components alongside farming/ranching.
  Source (county industry mix and wages): Idaho Department of Labor.

• Common occupations and workforce breakdown
  Occupation distributions for Franklin County are most consistently available through:

  • ACS “Occupation” tables (county resident workforce by major occupation group)
  • Idaho Department of Labor profiles (occupation demand and staffing patterns)
    In rural southeastern Idaho counties, common groups include management, office/administrative support, sales, production, transportation/material moving, construction, and farming occupations, with education and healthcare roles concentrated in schools/clinics and regional service hubs.
    Source: U.S. Census Bureau (ACS), Idaho Department of Labor.

• Commuting patterns and mean commute time
  The most recent county commuting metrics (including mean travel time to work and commuting mode share) are published in the ACS. Franklin County’s rural setting typically corresponds to high private vehicle use and limited public transit, with commuting flows to nearby employment centers across county lines.
  Source: U.S. Census Bureau (ACS commuting tables).

• Local employment vs. out-of-county work
  County-to-county commuting flows are best described using the U.S. Census Bureau’s OnTheMap/LEHD data products, which report inflow/outflow (resident workers working in-county vs. leaving the county for work). Franklin County’s position near regional hubs and the Utah border supports a measurable share of out-commuting relative to total employed residents.
  Source: U.S. Census Bureau OnTheMap (LEHD).

Housing and Real Estate

• Homeownership and rental share
  The most recent county tenure split is provided by the ACS (owner-occupied vs. renter-occupied housing units). Rural Idaho counties such as Franklin County typically show higher homeownership rates than urban counties, with rentals concentrated in town centers and near employment nodes.
  Source: U.S. Census Bureau (ACS housing tenure).

• Median property values and recent trends

  • Median owner-occupied home value (countywide) is published by the ACS.
  • Short-term price trends are often tracked via regional MLS summaries and state housing dashboards; however, the ACS median provides the most standardized county benchmark.
    Trend proxy note: Where county-specific time-series sales data are not publicly summarized in a single official series, statewide/regional housing-market reports are commonly used as context while the ACS median anchors the county level.
    Sources: U.S. Census Bureau (ACS median value).

• Typical rent prices
  The ACS reports median gross rent for Franklin County. Rural counties generally have lower median rents than metro areas, with limited multifamily inventory affecting availability and price dispersion.
  Source: U.S. Census Bureau (ACS median gross rent).

• Housing types and built environment
  Franklin County’s housing stock is dominated by single-family detached homes and manufactured homes, with small multifamily properties (duplexes/low-rise apartments) concentrated in Preston and smaller town centers. Outside incorporated areas, rural lots and farm-adjacent housing are common, with longer driveway/access patterns and reliance on personal vehicles for services.
  Source (housing structure type counts/shares): U.S. Census Bureau (ACS units in structure).

• Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools/amenities)

  • In-town neighborhoods (notably Preston) generally provide the closest proximity to schools, grocery, clinics, and civic services, with more grid-like street patterns.
  • Outlying communities and unincorporated areas provide larger lots and agricultural adjacency, with longer travel distances to schools and amenities and winter travel considerations typical of southeastern Idaho.
    Proxy note: These characteristics reflect the county’s settlement pattern; parcel-level proximity varies by town and roadway network.

• Property tax overview (rate and typical homeowner cost)
  Idaho property taxes are administered locally with state oversight; homeowner costs depend on assessed value, local levy rates, and exemptions (notably the Idaho homeowner’s exemption for eligible owner-occupied primary residences). County-level levy rates and typical bills vary by taxing district (school, city, highway, etc.). The most authoritative sources for Franklin County are the Franklin County Assessor/Treasurer publications and the Idaho State Tax Commission property tax guidance.
  Sources: Idaho State Tax Commission (property tax and homeowner’s exemption), Franklin County, Idaho (county offices).