Caribou County is a rural county in southeastern Idaho, bordering Wyoming and located northeast of Pocatello within the broader Upper Snake River Plain and adjacent mountain-and-valley terrain. Created in 1919 from part of Bannock County, it takes its name from the Caribou Mountains and developed historically around agriculture, mining, and transportation corridors linking Idaho to western Wyoming. The county is small in population, with roughly 7,000 residents, and its settlement pattern is characterized by small towns and dispersed ranchland. Soda Springs, the county seat, is the largest community and a regional center for services and industry. The local economy includes farming and livestock production, along with phosphate-related and other resource-based industries that have long shaped employment in the area. Landscapes range from irrigated valleys to forested uplands, and outdoor recreation tied to rivers, reservoirs, and mountains is part of the county’s regional identity.

Caribou County Local Demographic Profile

Caribou County is located in southeastern Idaho along the Wyoming border, with its county seat in Soda Springs. The county includes a mix of small communities and large areas of public land and agriculture in the Bear River region.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Caribou County, Idaho, the county had an estimated population of 6,963 (2023).

Age & Gender

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Caribou County, Idaho (latest available county profile measures), the age and sex composition is:

  • Age distribution (percent of population)

    • Under 5 years: 6.1%
    • Under 18 years: 26.0%
    • 65 years and over: 17.9%

  • Gender (sex)

    • Female persons: 49.3%
    • Male persons: 50.7% (computed as 100% − female share)

Racial & Ethnic Composition

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Caribou County, Idaho, racial and ethnic composition (percent) includes:

  • White alone: 96.1%
  • Black or African American alone: 0.3%
  • American Indian and Alaska Native alone: 0.9%
  • Asian alone: 0.3%
  • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone: 0.1%
  • Two or more races: 2.3%
  • Hispanic or Latino (of any race): 4.4%

Household & Housing Data

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Caribou County, Idaho, household and housing indicators include:

  • Households (2018–2022): 2,458
  • Persons per household: 2.59
  • Owner-occupied housing unit rate: 78.7%
  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units: $207,900
  • Median selected monthly owner costs (with a mortgage): $1,226
  • Median selected monthly owner costs (without a mortgage): $377
  • Median gross rent: $747
  • Housing units: 3,175

For local government and planning resources, visit the Caribou County official website.

Email Usage

Caribou County, in sparsely populated southeastern Idaho with dispersed towns and rural terrain, faces higher per‑household network buildout costs, making digital communication more dependent on available fixed broadband and mobile coverage than in urban areas. Direct county-level email usage statistics are not routinely published, so broadband and device access are used as proxies for email adoption.

Digital access indicators are best sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau (American Community Survey), which reports household broadband subscriptions (by type) and computer ownership at the county level; these measures closely track the practical ability to use email reliably. Age structure from the same ACS tables is relevant because older populations typically show lower rates of adopting online services, including email, while school‑age and working‑age shares increase routine use. Gender distribution is available in ACS but is generally less predictive of email adoption than age and access.

Connectivity limitations in rural counties commonly include fewer last‑mile options, longer distances to network nodes, and coverage gaps. Infrastructure context and deployment constraints are documented in federal broadband mapping such as the FCC National Broadband Map.

Mobile Phone Usage

Caribou County is a rural county in southeastern Idaho along the Wyoming border, with major population centers including Soda Springs and Grace and extensive mountainous and high-elevation terrain (e.g., portions of the Caribou Range). Low population density, long distances between settlements, and terrain-driven line-of-sight constraints are structural factors that commonly affect mobile coverage and mobile broadband performance in the county. County-level geography and population context are available via the U.S. Census Bureau (data.census.gov) and the Census geography reference for counties.

Key distinction: network availability vs. household adoption

  • Network availability refers to where mobile operators report service as available (coverage footprints by technology such as LTE/4G or 5G).
  • Household adoption refers to whether residents actually subscribe to mobile service and/or use mobile as their primary internet connection (survey- or subscription-based measures).

County-level availability is generally obtainable from federal coverage datasets. County-level adoption is more limited and is often reported at broader geographies (state, multi-county regions) or by survey categories that do not isolate one county cleanly.

Mobile penetration / access indicators (adoption)

What is available at county scale

  • Mobile service subscription as a standalone county metric (e.g., “smartphone penetration”) is not consistently published for Caribou County in a single, official county-specific series.
  • The most widely used county- and tract-level adoption measure relevant to “mobile as internet” is the share of households with cellular data plans (often reported as “cellular data plan” as a type of internet subscription) from the American Community Survey (ACS), where available at tract/county tabulations.

Relevant sources:

Interpretation limits

  • ACS “cellular data plan” measures internet subscription type, not overall mobile phone ownership. A household may own mobile phones but subscribe to fixed broadband rather than using cellular for home internet.
  • Small, rural counties can have larger ACS margins of error, limiting precision for year-to-year comparisons at the county level.

Network availability (coverage) and mobile internet technologies

4G LTE availability

  • 4G LTE is generally the baseline mobile broadband technology reported across most populated areas in the United States, and coverage reporting for LTE is available through FCC datasets and mapping tools.
  • County-level LTE “availability” is best assessed via FCC mobile broadband coverage resources, which compile carrier-reported coverage submissions.

Primary sources:

5G availability

  • 5G availability in rural, mountainous counties is often uneven: it tends to be strongest near towns, highways, and flatter valleys, and weaker in remote mountainous areas. The definitive, county-relevant reference is the FCC mobile coverage display at the location level.
  • The FCC map distinguishes between types of 5G reported by providers (often shown as 5G “basic”/low-band versus faster mid-band or millimeter-wave in some areas, depending on how providers submit and the map’s current categories).

Primary sources:

Practical geography-related constraints (availability vs. performance)

  • FCC availability indicates where a provider reports service, not guaranteed in-building reception, consistent throughput, or low latency in mountainous topography.
  • In Caribou County, terrain can introduce coverage gaps and variable performance even inside reported coverage polygons due to elevation changes, forested slopes, and distance from towers.

Mobile internet usage patterns (how mobile is used)

What can be stated with defensible sources

  • Mobile as home internet (cellular data plan households) can be derived from ACS internet subscription type tables where the county estimate is published with acceptable reliability.
  • Technology use (4G vs 5G usage share) is not typically reported as a county-specific “usage pattern” statistic by official public datasets. Public data generally covers availability, not actual device attach rates or traffic shares, at the county level.

County-relevant, non-speculative framing:

  • Availability layers from the FCC identify where LTE and 5G are reported as available; ACS identifies whether households report a cellular data plan as their internet subscription type. These are complementary but do not measure the same thing.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

County-level device-type data limitations

  • Public, official datasets rarely provide county-level smartphone vs. feature phone ownership rates.
  • National or state-level surveys (not specific to Caribou County) exist for smartphone ownership, but applying those rates to a specific rural county would not be a county-level measurement.

Defensible county-adjacent indicators:

  • ACS includes measures related to computer ownership and internet subscription at local geographies, which can contextualize whether households rely on mobile-only access versus a mix of devices and fixed connections. See ACS computer and internet tables on data.census.gov.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage in Caribou County

Rural settlement pattern and population density

  • Dispersed housing outside small towns typically increases the cost per covered user for mobile infrastructure and can reduce the density of tower sites, affecting both coverage continuity and capacity.
  • County population size and density profiles are documented via U.S. Census Bureau profiles on data.census.gov.

Terrain and elevation

  • Mountainous terrain and higher elevations can limit signal propagation, create shadowed areas, and increase dependence on tower placement along valleys and transportation corridors.
  • Landform and elevation context can be corroborated via federal mapping resources (for general terrain context) such as the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).

Transportation corridors and towns as coverage anchors

  • Mobile networks in rural western counties commonly concentrate coverage near incorporated places, state highways, and U.S. routes where demand and feasible backhaul are stronger; FCC location-based checks within Caribou County show where providers report coverage around Soda Springs, Grace, and connecting corridors versus remote backcountry.

Socioeconomic factors (measured, not inferred)

  • ACS provides county-level distributions for income, age, and housing characteristics, which are commonly associated in research literature with differences in internet subscription types (fixed vs cellular), but the county-specific relationship must be supported by ACS cross-tabulations rather than inferred.
  • Relevant baseline demographic tables are accessible through data.census.gov.

Summary of what can be measured reliably for Caribou County

  • Network availability (4G/5G): Best measured using the FCC National Broadband Map with mobile layers at specific points across the county; this is provider-reported availability, not adoption or performance.
  • Household adoption related to mobile internet: Best measured using ACS estimates for cellular data plan as an internet subscription type on data.census.gov, with attention to margins of error in a small rural county.
  • Smartphone vs non-smartphone device types: Not consistently available at county level from official public sources; ACS can contextualize device ecosystems through computer ownership and subscription types but does not directly report smartphone penetration in a county-specific, comprehensive way.

Social Media Trends

Caribou County is a rural county in southeastern Idaho along the Wyoming border, with Soda Springs as the county seat and a local economy shaped by phosphate mining, ranching, and outdoor recreation in and around the Caribou Range. Lower population density, longer travel distances, and reliance on regional hubs for services generally align with heavier use of mobile-first social networking and community information sharing rather than large-scale creator economies.

User statistics (penetration/usage)

  • Local (county-level) social-media penetration: No reputable, regularly updated public dataset reports social-media users specifically for Caribou County; most high-quality measurements are national or state-level.
  • National benchmarks used as a proxy for rural counties: About 7 in 10 U.S. adults use social media according to the Pew Research Center social media fact sheet. This provides the closest widely cited baseline for interpreting likely adoption in rural counties like Caribou.
  • Broad internet access context: Social media participation is constrained by connectivity and device access; Pew’s Internet/broadband fact sheet is commonly used to contextualize rural usage differences (rural adults report lower home broadband adoption than urban/suburban adults).

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

Based on Pew national findings (Pew Research Center), social media use is highest among younger adults and declines with age:

  • 18–29: Highest adoption (roughly 9 in 10 report using social media).
  • 30–49: High adoption (roughly 8 in 10).
  • 50–64: Moderate-to-high adoption (roughly 7 in 10).
  • 65+: Lower but substantial adoption (roughly 4–5 in 10). Interpretation for Caribou County: A rural county profile typically concentrates heavy social usage among working-age adults and younger residents, with older residents using fewer platforms and favoring simpler, feed-based or messaging-centered experiences.

Gender breakdown

Pew’s national patterns show small overall gender differences in whether adults use social media, while platform choice varies by gender (documented in Pew platform detail tables within the same fact sheet). Commonly observed national tendencies include:

  • Women over-indexing on visually and socially oriented platforms (e.g., Pinterest, and often Facebook/Instagram usage intensity).
  • Men tending to over-index on some discussion/news-leaning or video-centric platforms in certain measures. County-level gender splits are not published by reputable sources; rural counties generally mirror the national pattern of modest overall gender differences with clearer variation by platform.

Most-used platforms (typical mix and approximate usage)

No public, authoritative source publishes platform-by-platform usage for Caribou County specifically. National platform reach from Pew provides the most reliable comparison point (Pew Research Center):

  • YouTube: used by a large majority of U.S. adults (highest reach nationally).
  • Facebook: used by a majority of adults; remains especially important for local community updates and groups.
  • Instagram: used by a sizable minority; skews younger.
  • Pinterest: used by a sizable minority; skews more female.
  • TikTok: used by a sizable minority; strongly skews younger.
  • LinkedIn: used by a smaller share overall; skews toward college-educated and professional occupations.
  • X (formerly Twitter): used by a smaller share of adults than the largest platforms.

Behavioral trends (engagement and preferences)

Patterns below reflect well-established rural/community and national usage findings from Pew’s platform research (Pew Research Center) and widely observed platform functions:

  • Community-information utility is a dominant use case: Rural communities tend to rely heavily on Facebook Pages and Groups for school updates, local government notices, weather-related information, events, buy/sell activity, and community discussions.
  • Video is a cross-age engagement driver: YouTube typically functions as the broadest “utility” platform (how-to content, repairs, outdoor recreation, and news clips). Short-form video engagement is concentrated among younger adults on TikTok and Instagram Reels.
  • Messaging and coordination are central: Social platforms are often used for practical coordination (events, services, local recommendations), with engagement patterns emphasizing commenting, sharing, and group interactions over public broadcasting.
  • Platform “stacking” by age: Younger users commonly maintain multi-platform routines (e.g., TikTok/Instagram + YouTube), while older users more often concentrate activity on one or two platforms (frequently Facebook + YouTube).
  • Engagement tends to be episodic around local events: In rural counties, posting and sharing activity often spikes around school sports, severe weather, road conditions, community fundraisers, and seasonal outdoor activities.

Note on data limits: County-specific platform percentages and demographic splits are not available from major public surveys; the figures above rely on nationally representative benchmarks from Pew and are presented as the most defensible reference points for interpreting likely usage in Caribou County.

Family & Associates Records

Caribou County family and associate-related public records primarily include vital records, court records, and property filings. Idaho maintains statewide vital records (birth and death certificates), while local custody includes recording and court documentation.

Birth and death records are issued by the Idaho Bureau of Vital Records and Health Statistics (statewide). Certified copies are generally available to eligible requesters and are not fully public. County-level access is commonly limited to informational indexes where available rather than certified certificates. Adoption records are handled through the courts and state vital records systems and are generally sealed, with access restricted by statute and court order.

Publicly accessible databases relevant to family or associates include the county’s recorded land records (deeds, mortgages, liens) and county court resources. Recorded documents can be searched through the Caribou County Clerk, Auditor & Recorder office, which is the primary local custodian for recordings and several administrative records. Court case access is provided through the Idaho Supreme Court court system, including online case information via statewide tools.

In-person access is typically available at the Caribou County Clerk/Auditor/Recorder’s office for recording searches and copies, subject to fees. Privacy restrictions commonly apply to certified vital records, juvenile matters, sealed adoption files, and certain confidential court records; public access is governed by the Idaho Public Records Act.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

Marriage records

  • Marriage licenses and marriage certificates: A marriage license is issued before the ceremony by the county; the completed license is typically returned for recording after the ceremony and becomes the county’s official marriage record.
  • Marriage record copies: Certified and non-certified copies may be available depending on the requester’s eligibility under Idaho’s vital records rules.

Divorce records

  • Divorce decrees (final judgments): Issued by the court at the conclusion of a divorce case and maintained as part of the court case file.
  • Divorce case files: May include the petition/complaint, summons, affidavits, findings of fact and conclusions of law, child support/custody orders, parenting plans, property and debt distribution orders, and the final decree.

Annulment records

  • Annulment decrees (judgments declaring a marriage void/voidable): Issued by the court and maintained in the same manner as other civil case judgments, as part of the court case file.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

Marriage licenses/recorded marriages (county level)

  • Filed/recorded with: The Caribou County Clerk/Auditor (Recorder) is the local office that typically issues marriage licenses and records completed marriage documents for the county.
  • Access: Requests are commonly handled through the Recorder’s office in person or by written request. Access to certified copies is governed by Idaho vital records law and identification/eligibility requirements.

Marriage and divorce vital records (state level)

  • Filed/maintained with: The Idaho Bureau of Vital Records and Health Statistics maintains statewide marriage and divorce certificates (vital record indexes/certificates), which are separate from court decrees and full case files.
  • Access: Requests are submitted through the state vital records office and are subject to eligibility restrictions and identity verification.
    Link: Idaho Bureau of Vital Records and Health Statistics

Divorce decrees and annulment judgments (court level)

  • Filed/maintained with: The Clerk of the District Court for the judicial district serving Caribou County maintains divorce and annulment case files and final judgments.
  • Access: Court records are generally accessible through the clerk’s office, subject to confidentiality rules and any sealing orders. Some information may be viewable through Idaho’s statewide court records system, with restricted content redacted or blocked.
    Link: Idaho iCourt Portal

Typical information included in these records

Marriage license/recorded marriage record (county)

Common fields include:

  • Full legal names of both parties (and prior names where applicable)
  • Date and place of marriage (city/county/state)
  • Date the license was issued and license number
  • Officiant name/title and signature
  • Witness information (where required/recorded)
  • Parties’ ages/birth information and residence at the time of application (as reflected on the application/record)
  • Recording details (date recorded, recorder/filing reference)

Divorce decree (court)

Common elements include:

  • Court caption, case number, and filing venue
  • Names of the parties
  • Date of judgment and judge’s signature
  • Orders on dissolution of marriage
  • Orders addressing property and debt division
  • Orders addressing child custody, visitation, child support, and medical support (when applicable)
  • Spousal maintenance/alimony orders (when applicable)
  • Name changes granted (when applicable)

Annulment judgment (court)

Common elements include:

  • Court caption and case number
  • Names of the parties
  • Findings and legal basis for annulment (as stated in the judgment)
  • Orders addressing property, support, custody/support (when applicable)
  • Date of judgment and judge’s signature

Privacy or legal restrictions

  • Idaho vital records restrictions: Certified copies of state-issued marriage and divorce vital records are not universally available to the public. Idaho limits who may obtain certified copies and requires identity verification; non-certified informational copies may also be restricted depending on record type and purpose.
  • Court record confidentiality: Divorce and annulment case files are generally public court records, but specific filings or data elements may be confidential by law or court rule (commonly including certain family-law records involving minors, protected addresses, financial account numbers, and other sensitive identifiers). Courts may also seal particular documents or entire case files by order.
  • Redaction requirements: Idaho courts and requesters are subject to rules limiting disclosure of sensitive personal identifiers in publicly accessible records, with redaction or restricted access applied to protected information.
  • Access may differ by record type: A divorce certificate from vital records typically provides summary data, while a divorce decree is the court’s final order and may contain more detailed provisions; access is governed by different offices and rules.

Education, Employment and Housing

Caribou County is a rural county in southeastern Idaho along the Wyoming border, with county government based in Soda Springs and additional communities including Grace and Bancroft. The population is small and dispersed across agricultural valleys and mountain terrain, with daily life centered on schools, local government, agriculture, and natural‑resource-related employment.

Education Indicators

Public schools (districts and schools)

Caribou County is primarily served by two public school districts:

  • Soda Springs Joint School District No. 150
    • Soda Springs High School
    • Soda Springs Middle School
    • Tigert Middle School (alternative middle-level program in Soda Springs)
    • Thirkill Elementary School
  • Grace Joint School District No. 148
    • Grace High School
    • Grace Jr. High School
    • Grace Elementary School

School listings are reflected in the Idaho State Department of Education’s public directory and district information pages (see the Idaho State Department of Education and the Idaho Report Card site for current rosters and reported metrics by school).

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratios: District- and school-level ratios are reported on the state report card, but values vary year to year and by school. Caribou County schools typically reflect small-district class sizes common in rural southeastern Idaho; the most defensible “most recent” ratios should be taken directly from the current year entries in the Idaho Report Card.
  • Graduation rates: Idaho publishes 4‑year cohort graduation rates by high school and district via the same source. Caribou County high schools (Soda Springs and Grace) have historically reported rates that can fluctuate due to small cohort sizes; the authoritative “most recent year” graduation rate is the latest posted on the Idaho Report Card.

Proxy note: Because Caribou County has small graduating cohorts, year-to-year graduation rate changes can be driven by a small number of students; district trends are more stable when viewed over multiple years.

Adult education levels (countywide)

The most widely used countywide measures come from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) 5‑year estimates:

  • High school diploma (or higher): Caribou County is generally high, consistent with rural Idaho counties where high school completion is the norm.
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher: Caribou County is typically below the U.S. average, reflecting a workforce weighted toward trades, agriculture, and resource-related industries.

For the most recent published county values, use the ACS “Educational Attainment” table for Caribou County on data.census.gov (ACS 5‑year is the standard “most recent” for small counties).

Notable academic programs (STEM, CTE, AP/dual credit)

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE): Idaho high schools commonly provide CTE pathways (agriculture, business, industrial/technical fields, and related certifications) aligned to statewide CTE frameworks. District program specifics are best documented through district course catalogs and state CTE reporting.
  • Dual credit / concurrent enrollment: Idaho districts frequently participate in dual-credit opportunities through Idaho higher education partners; availability depends on staffing and annual offerings.
  • Advanced Placement (AP): AP availability in small rural high schools is often limited compared with metro districts; dual credit may be more common than a large AP catalog.

Proxy note: District-specific program inventories are not consistently centralized in a single public dataset; the most verifiable proxy is the program/course listing published by each district and the Idaho report card narrative/program fields.

School safety measures and counseling resources

  • Idaho districts commonly implement secure entry practices, visitor sign‑in procedures, emergency operations planning, and coordination with local law enforcement.
  • Counseling and student support in rural districts typically includes school counselors and referral relationships for behavioral health services, with staffing levels varying by school size.

Publicly posted safety plans are often limited for security reasons; the most defensible documentation is district policy handbooks and required state reporting where available.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year)

  • The most current county unemployment figures are published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) and Idaho’s labor market portal. Caribou County’s unemployment rate is generally close to statewide levels but can be seasonally influenced by agriculture, construction, and resource-related activity.
  • The “most recent year” annual average rate is available via BLS LAUS and the Idaho Department of Labor LMI dashboards.

Major industries and employment sectors

Caribou County’s employment base is typically concentrated in:

  • Agriculture and ranching (including support services)
  • Mining, quarrying, and related natural-resource activity
  • Manufacturing and construction (often connected to regional supply chains and infrastructure)
  • Public administration and education (schools, county services)
  • Health care and social assistance and retail trade as core local services

County industry mix can be validated in ACS “Industry by Occupation/Industry” tables on data.census.gov and in state LMI profiles.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

The occupational structure commonly reflects rural county norms:

  • Management/professional roles in education, public services, and local business administration
  • Production, transportation, and material moving jobs tied to manufacturing/logistics and resource-related operations
  • Construction and extraction and installation/maintenance/repair
  • Service occupations (health care support, food service) and sales/office roles concentrated in Soda Springs/Grace service centers

For the most recent distribution by occupation category, use ACS “Occupation” tables for Caribou County on data.census.gov.

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

  • Caribou County commuting includes in‑county work in Soda Springs and Grace plus out‑commuting to adjacent counties in southeastern Idaho and across the Wyoming line for specialized jobs.
  • Mean commute times for small rural counties are typically moderate (often in the ~15–30 minute range), with longer commutes for cross‑county employment.

The most recent county mean travel time to work and mode split (drive alone, carpool, etc.) are reported in ACS commuting tables on data.census.gov.

Local employment vs. out‑of‑county work

  • Rural counties commonly show a meaningful share of residents working outside the county, particularly in specialized industry, regional health care, and larger employment centers.
  • The clearest published measure is ACS “Place of Work” and commuting flow indicators; supplemental commuting-flow detail is available through LEHD OnTheMap (U.S. Census/LEHD), which provides resident-to-workplace patterns.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership vs. renting

  • Caribou County is predominantly owner‑occupied, reflecting rural single‑family housing stock and multigenerational community patterns. The most recent homeownership rate and renter share are available from ACS housing tenure tables on data.census.gov.

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median home value (owner-occupied) for Caribou County is reported by ACS; the county generally remains below Idaho’s high-growth metro markets but has been influenced by statewide appreciation over the past several years.
  • For trend context, the most comparable “recent trend” proxy is ACS year-over-year changes and regional southeastern Idaho comparisons rather than volatile monthly price series (small counties often have limited sales volume).

Typical rent prices

  • Median gross rent is available via ACS and typically tracks below Idaho’s largest metros, with variability by unit type and proximity to Soda Springs or Grace services.
  • The most recent median gross rent for the county is published on data.census.gov (ACS housing tables).

Housing types

Housing stock is dominated by:

  • Single-family detached homes and manufactured homes on larger lots
  • A smaller supply of multifamily rentals (apartments/duplexes) concentrated near town centers (Soda Springs and Grace)
  • Rural residential properties with acreage and agricultural adjacency

This composition is consistent with ACS “Units in Structure” distributions for the county.

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools/amenities)

  • The most concentrated access to schools, clinics, grocery/retail, and civic services occurs in Soda Springs and Grace, where schools and public facilities are located within town street networks.
  • Outside town centers, housing is more dispersed, and access to amenities generally requires driving, consistent with rural county settlement patterns.

Property tax overview (rate and typical cost)

  • Idaho property taxes are primarily local (county, city, school, and other taxing districts) and vary by taxing district and assessed value; counties publish levy rates and budgets annually.
  • Typical homeowner tax cost is best represented by effective tax rate proxies (tax paid as a share of home value) and median tax amounts from ACS, supplemented by county assessor/taxing district publications.

For county-level median property tax amounts and related housing costs, use ACS “Selected Housing Characteristics” on data.census.gov. For levy rates and assessment administration, reference the Idaho State Tax Commission and local Caribou County assessor/tax information pages (published by the county).

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Idaho