Cassia County is located in south-central Idaho along the Utah border, extending across the Snake River Plain and adjacent high desert and mountain foothills. Established in 1879, it developed as an agricultural and transportation corridor, shaped by irrigation projects and rail and highway routes linking southern Idaho with the Intermountain West. The county is small in population, with about 25,000 residents, and most communities are modest in size and widely spaced. The county seat is Burley, the principal population center and a regional service hub. Cassia County’s landscape includes irrigated farmland, rangeland, and prominent volcanic features such as portions of the City of Rocks area, reflecting a mix of working agricultural terrain and public lands. The economy is largely rural and resource-based, centered on farming, food processing, and related logistics, with local culture influenced by longstanding agricultural communities and outdoor recreation traditions.

Cassia County Local Demographic Profile

Cassia County is located in south-central Idaho along the Interstate 84 corridor, with Burley as the county seat and primary population center. The county borders the Snake River Plain to the north and is part of Idaho’s Magic Valley region.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Cassia County, Idaho, Cassia County’s population was 24,655 (2020 Census). The U.S. Census Bureau also reports an estimated population of 25,910 (2023) for Cassia County via the same QuickFacts profile.

Age & Gender

The U.S. Census Bureau’s data.census.gov provides county-level demographic tables for Cassia County (select “Cassia County, Idaho” and “ACS 5-year” tables for the most detailed breakdowns). A single consolidated age distribution and gender ratio is not available from U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts in the same level of detail as full ACS tables.

For authoritative local administration context, refer to the Cassia County official website.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Cassia County, Idaho, Cassia County’s reported composition includes standard Census race categories and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (reported separately from race). QuickFacts is the U.S. Census Bureau’s published county profile for these measures; detailed race-by-ethnicity cross-tabulations are available via data.census.gov (ACS 5-year tables).

Household & Housing Data

The U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Cassia County, Idaho provides county-level households, persons per household, owner-occupied housing rate, median value, median rent, and housing unit counts as published indicators for Cassia County. More granular breakdowns (household type, family vs. nonfamily households, occupancy/vacancy characteristics, and housing structure types) are available through data.census.gov (ACS 5-year housing and social characteristics tables).

Email Usage

Cassia County’s large rural area and widely spaced population centers around Burley and nearby towns increase the cost of last‑mile networks, so email access largely tracks household connectivity rather than local institutions.

Direct county-level email-usage statistics are not routinely published; broadband and device access serve as proxies for likely email adoption. The most current county indicators are available via the U.S. Census Bureau (ACS) data portal and the American Community Survey, including household broadband subscription and computer ownership, which are strongly associated with regular email use.

Age structure influences adoption because older age groups have lower average rates of digital account use, while working-age adults show higher rates; Cassia County’s age distribution can be referenced in ACS “Age and Sex” tables through data.census.gov. Gender composition is typically near parity in ACS and is not a primary predictor of email access compared with age and connectivity.

Connectivity constraints are shaped by terrain, distance between homes, and carrier economics; the FCC National Broadband Map documents service availability and technology types that affect reliability and speeds for routine email access.

Mobile Phone Usage

Cassia County is located in south-central Idaho along the Interstate 84 corridor, with population concentrated in Burley (the county seat) and smaller communities and agricultural areas across the Snake River Plain. The county is predominantly rural with relatively low population density outside city limits, and connectivity conditions are influenced by wide coverage areas, irrigation/agricultural land use, and the presence of dispersed housing and transportation corridors. County context and basic demographics are available via the county profile on Census.gov QuickFacts (Cassia County, Idaho).

Key distinction: network availability vs. household adoption

  • Network availability describes where mobile providers report service (coverage footprints) and the technologies available (4G LTE, 5G).
  • Household adoption describes whether residents actually subscribe to mobile service and/or use it for internet access in the home.

County-level mobile coverage can be mapped with federal broadband datasets, while adoption is typically measured through household surveys (often available at county level for “internet subscription” and “cellular data plan” indicators, but not always broken out by device type).

Network availability (coverage) in Cassia County

FCC-reported mobile broadband coverage (4G/5G)

The most widely used public source for standardized mobile coverage reporting is the Federal Communications Commission’s Broadband Data Collection (BDC) maps:

  • The FCC’s National Broadband Map provides location-based and area-based views of mobile broadband availability by provider and technology, including 4G LTE and 5G variants where reported.

General coverage structure in rural southern Idaho (including Cassia County)

  • 4G LTE coverage is typically the most geographically extensive layer in rural counties due to propagation advantages and established tower networks.
  • 5G availability is often more concentrated around population centers and major road corridors (notably along I‑84 and within/near Burley and other towns), with coverage varying by provider and 5G implementation type. The FCC map is the appropriate source for confirming specific footprints in Cassia County at the address or road-segment level.

Limitations

  • FCC mobile availability reflects provider-reported coverage and modeling; it is not a direct measure of real-world signal quality indoors or at the edge of coverage. The FCC provides methodology and data notes through the map interface and related documentation on FCC Broadband Data Collection.

Terrain and land use factors affecting availability

Cassia County’s rural geography affects coverage in ways typical for agricultural regions:

  • Long distances between towers can reduce signal strength in sparsely populated areas.
  • Indoor coverage can be weaker in outlying areas even where outdoor coverage is reported.
  • Transportation corridors (I‑84 and state highways) commonly receive priority for continuous coverage relative to low-density farm and rangeland areas.

Household adoption and access indicators (county-level where available)

Internet subscription and mobile-only connectivity (ACS)

County-level adoption is most commonly measured via the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS). For Cassia County, adoption indicators such as:

  • Households with an internet subscription
  • Households with cellular data plan
  • Households with smartphone (as a computing device)
  • Households with no internet access are typically available through ACS “Computer and Internet Use” tables, depending on the release year and table detail.

Primary sources:

Clear limitation

  • ACS provides adoption (subscription/device presence) but does not directly measure mobile signal quality, nor does it provide carrier-specific usage patterns. It also cannot reliably distinguish 4G vs 5G usage at the household level.

State and local broadband planning context

Idaho’s statewide broadband efforts and datasets can provide context for adoption gaps and infrastructure priorities:

  • The Idaho Broadband Office publishes planning materials, challenge processes, and state broadband context that may reference regional barriers affecting rural counties.

Mobile internet usage patterns (4G vs 5G, fixed vs mobile reliance)

Technology availability vs. technology used

  • Availability (FCC BDC) indicates where 4G/5G is offered.
  • Usage patterns (how people connect) are more commonly inferred from adoption indicators such as “cellular data plan,” “smartphone,” and “no fixed subscription,” rather than measured directly at county scale.

County-level patterns that can be assessed using public datasets:

  • Mobile as a primary internet connection is proxied by ACS measures showing households with cellular data plan and potentially lacking other subscription types (e.g., no wired broadband subscription reported in ACS internet subscription categories). This assessment requires careful interpretation of ACS tables because ACS categories describe subscription types and device availability rather than “primary connection.”

Limitations

  • Public county-level datasets generally do not report:
    • The share of residents actively using 5G vs 4G on their devices
    • Average mobile speeds or latency by neighborhood
    • Time-of-day congestion impacts
      These topics are more commonly addressed by third-party measurement firms rather than government statistics.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

Household device indicators (ACS)

The most consistent county-level device information comes from ACS “Computer and Internet Use,” which can include:

  • Smartphone presence
  • Desktop/laptop
  • Tablet These indicators describe whether households report having those devices, not whether the devices are connected via mobile networks.

Source for county estimates:

Limitations

  • ACS device categories reflect household-reported access and do not identify handset models, operating systems, or whether a phone is 4G-only vs 5G-capable.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage in Cassia County

Rural settlement patterns and service economics

  • Lower density outside Burley increases per-user infrastructure costs and commonly results in larger coverage cells and fewer redundant sites, affecting consistency of service in remote areas.
  • Households farther from town centers often face fewer fixed-line options, which can increase reliance on mobile data plans (measured indirectly through ACS subscription categories).

Age, income, and education (measured through Census/ACS)

Transportation corridors and community hubs

  • Mobile network investment often tracks roadway use and population hubs. In Cassia County, the I‑84 corridor and Burley-area growth patterns are relevant to interpreting why availability may be stronger near towns and highways than in dispersed agricultural areas. Roadway and local planning context can be referenced through Cassia County’s official website (county services, communities, and local context).

Summary of what can be stated with high confidence (and what cannot)

  • High-confidence, county-specific (public):
  • Not typically available at county level from government sources:
    • Direct measurement of 4G vs 5G usage share, average mobile speeds, indoor coverage reliability by neighborhood, and congestion patterns.

Social Media Trends

Cassia County is in south-central Idaho along the Interstate 84 corridor, with Burley as the county seat and a regional service hub. The local economy is shaped by agriculture and food processing (including dairy and crops) and by logistics tied to the Snake River Plain. These characteristics generally support practical, mobile-first communication and community information-sharing patterns typical of small-to-mid-sized rural counties in Idaho.

User statistics (penetration/active use)

  • County-specific social media penetration is not published as a standard metric by major survey organizations; most reputable measures are reported at the U.S. and state level rather than county level.
  • Using national benchmarks, about 7 in 10 U.S. adults use social media (roughly 69%), based on long-running survey tracking from the Pew Research Center’s Social Media Fact Sheet. Cassia County is generally expected to be within the same broad range as similarly rural counties, with local variation influenced by age structure, broadband availability, and occupation mix.
  • Social media use is strongly associated with smartphone adoption and internet access; Pew’s internet and technology reporting provides the most widely cited baseline context (see Pew Research Center Internet & Technology).

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

Nationally, age is the strongest predictor of use and intensity:

  • 18–29: highest social media use; Pew reports usage rates that are consistently near-universal for at least one platform (often 80–90%+ depending on the specific survey year and platform mix).
  • 30–49: high usage; typically ~70–80%+ using social media.
  • 50–64: moderate usage; typically ~50–70%.
  • 65+: lowest usage; commonly ~40–50% (trend rising over time).
    These directional patterns are consistently documented in the Pew social media fact sheet and related Pew reporting.

Gender breakdown

  • Overall, gender gaps are modest for general social media adoption in the U.S., with differences more visible by platform than by “any social media” usage.
  • Platform-specific patterns (U.S. adults) commonly documented by Pew include:
    • Pinterest: higher usage among women than men.
    • Reddit: higher usage among men than women.
    • Facebook/Instagram: often closer to parity or modest differences depending on year and measurement.
      Source baseline: Pew Research Center platform-by-demographic tables.

Most-used platforms (percentages where available)

County-level platform shares are not typically published by reputable sources; the most defensible figures are national estimates. Among U.S. adults, Pew’s latest platform estimates commonly place the following among the leading platforms (order and exact values vary by survey year):

  • YouTube (largest reach among U.S. adults)
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • TikTok
  • LinkedIn
  • X (formerly Twitter)
  • Reddit
  • Snapchat
  • WhatsApp
    For current percentages and demographic breakouts, use Pew’s continuously updated tables: Social media use in 2024 (Pew Research Center).

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns/platform preferences)

Patterns below reflect well-documented rural/small-market behaviors observed in national research and in platform usage studies:

  • Community information and local news sharing tends to concentrate on Facebook (groups, local pages) because it supports event coordination, school/community updates, buy/sell activity, and local announcements.
  • Video-first consumption is a dominant mode across age groups, with YouTube as the broadest-reach platform for how-to content, entertainment, and informational viewing (Pew identifies YouTube as the most widely used platform among U.S. adults: Pew platform reach).
  • Short-form video (notably TikTok and Instagram Reels) skews younger, with higher daily-use intensity among teens and young adults; this aligns with Pew findings showing stronger TikTok adoption among younger cohorts.
  • Messaging and “sharing via private channels” (DMs, group chats) is a common complement to public posting, with platform features increasingly oriented toward private sharing and groups rather than open feeds (general trend documented across major platform research; Pew tracks usage while other measurement firms track feature-level behavior).
  • Usage timing in rural commuting and shift-work contexts commonly concentrates around early morning, lunch breaks, and evening hours, with engagement often tied to local sports, school calendars, and community events (a recurring pattern in rural community social media studies, though not typically quantified at county level).

Source note: The most reliable, regularly updated percentages for platform usage and demographic splits come from the Pew Research Center. Cassia County–specific penetration and platform share estimates are not standard outputs of national survey programs and are therefore not reported as definitive county figures here.

Family & Associates Records

Cassia County-related family records include vital records (birth and death certificates) maintained at the state level by the Idaho Bureau of Vital Records and Health Statistics, with local issuance support through the South Central Public Health District (serving Cassia County). Marriage licenses are typically issued and recorded by the Cassia County Clerk/Auditor, and divorces are handled and filed through the Cassia County District Court. Adoption records are generally managed through Idaho courts and vital records systems rather than county public indexes.

Public databases commonly available for family and associate research include Cassia County property and assessment records, recorded documents, and court docket information. Cassia County provides online access points through the county’s official website and clerk/auditor resources for recorded documents and administrative contacts: Cassia County, Idaho (official website) and Cassia County Clerk/Auditor. Idaho’s statewide portal for ordering birth and death certificates is maintained by Idaho Vital Records.

Access occurs online via state and county web portals and in person at the relevant office (Clerk/Auditor for marriage and recorded documents; District Court for case files; state/local health for vital certificates). Privacy restrictions commonly limit access to recent birth and death certificates and most adoption records, while many land records and basic court docket information are publicly viewable, with some documents sealed or redacted by law or court order.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

  • Marriage licenses and marriage certificates (county-level records)
    • Cassia County issues marriage licenses through the county clerk’s office. After the ceremony, the officiant returns the completed license for recording, creating the county’s recorded marriage record.
  • Divorce case records (court records)
    • Divorce decrees are issued as part of a civil case in the district court. The final judgment (decree) is filed in the divorce case file.
  • Annulment case records (court records)
    • Annulments are handled as district court civil cases. Orders and judgments granting or denying an annulment are filed in the case record.
  • State vital records copies (state-level records)
    • Idaho maintains statewide marriage and divorce vital records (separate from the court case file for divorces/annulments). These are typically used for administrative proof.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

  • Marriage records (Cassia County)
    • Filed/recorded with: Cassia County Clerk (marriage licensing and recording).
    • Access: Requests are commonly handled by the county clerk’s office for local certified copies and record searches, subject to identification and county procedures.
  • Divorce and annulment decrees and case files (Cassia County District Court)
    • Filed with: Cassia County District Court as part of the civil case docket and case file.
    • Access: Many docket details and non-restricted filings are available through the Idaho Supreme Court’s online portal, with additional documents obtainable from the courthouse clerk subject to court rules and redaction requirements.
  • State vital records (Idaho Bureau of Vital Records and Health Statistics)

Typical information included in these records

  • Marriage license / recorded marriage record
    • Full legal names of the spouses (including prior names where reported)
    • Date and place of marriage (ceremony location)
    • Date the license was issued and county of issuance
    • Officiant name/title and signature; witness information where applicable
    • Ages or dates of birth (as recorded), and residence addresses as listed on the application
    • Filing/recording details (recording date, instrument number or book/page references, depending on county format)
  • Divorce decree (final judgment)
    • Names of the parties and case number
    • Court, county, and judge
    • Date of decree and finding that the marriage is dissolved
    • Orders on legal issues addressed in the case (commonly child custody/parenting time, child support, spousal maintenance, division of property and debts, name change where granted)
  • Annulment judgment/order
    • Names of the parties and case number
    • Court and date of order/judgment
    • Determination regarding validity of the marriage (annulment granted or denied)
    • Related orders (property, support, custody) where applicable

Privacy or legal restrictions

  • Vital records restrictions (state copies)
    • Idaho restricts access to certified marriage and divorce vital records to eligible requestors under state law, generally requiring identity verification and a qualifying relationship or legal interest.
  • Court record access and confidentiality (divorce/annulment case files)
    • Divorce and annulment files are court records, but access is subject to Idaho Court Administrative Rules governing public access, confidentiality, and redaction.
    • Certain information is commonly protected or restricted (for example: Social Security numbers, financial account numbers, detailed financial affidavits in some contexts, records involving minors, adoption-related material, and documents sealed by court order).
    • Courts may seal specific filings or limit access when required by law or court order; public-facing portals may omit restricted documents even when a case is visible on the docket.

Education, Employment and Housing

Cassia County is in south‑central Idaho along the I‑84 corridor, anchored by Burley (county seat) and the Declo and Oakley areas, with a large rural/agricultural footprint and smaller incorporated communities. The county’s population is mid‑20,000s (ACS-era estimates), with a comparatively young age structure and many households tied to agriculture, food processing, logistics, and local services.

Education Indicators

Public school presence (counts and names)

Public K–12 education in Cassia County is primarily provided by three districts:

  • Cassia County Joint School District #151 (Burley/Declo area)
  • Oakley Joint School District #372 (Oakley area)
  • Albion Elementary School District #061 (Albion; elementary-only)

A consolidated, authoritative, public list of every individual school campus in the county is available through the Idaho State Department of Education’s “Find a School” directory (Idaho State Department of Education) and district webpages (district sites publish current school rosters, grade spans, and contacts). Public counts can vary slightly year to year due to program reconfigurations (e.g., alternative schools, online academies, and grade-span adjustments), so the SDE directory is the most stable reference point for “number of public schools” by current year.

Student–teacher ratios and graduation

  • Student–teacher ratio: District-level student–teacher ratios are typically reported in the high teens to low 20s across rural Idaho districts; Cassia County districts generally fall within that range based on common Idaho district staffing patterns. A countywide single ratio is not consistently published as a standard metric; the most comparable public proxy is district report cards and staffing figures in state/district accountability reports.
  • Graduation rate: Idaho publishes 4‑year adjusted cohort graduation rates by district and high school. Cassia County’s graduation outcomes are best represented using district/high-school level results (rather than a single county figure) from the state’s accountability reporting (see the Idaho school report card/accountability resources via Idaho State Department of Education). Countywide aggregation is not always published as a standalone statistic.

Adult educational attainment (county-level)

County educational attainment is most consistently measured via the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) for the population age 25+:

  • High school graduate (or higher): commonly in the mid‑80% range for Cassia County in recent ACS 5‑year profiles (lower than Idaho overall).
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher: commonly in the mid‑teens (%) in recent ACS 5‑year profiles (below Idaho overall).

The most direct source for these county percentages is the ACS “Educational Attainment” tables for Cassia County on data.census.gov (ACS 5‑year provides the most stable county estimates).

Notable academic/career programs (typical offerings and local delivery)

Cassia County high schools typically offer a mix of:

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE) pathways aligned to regional labor demand (ag mechanics, welding/manufacturing, business, health-related pathways, and related vocational coursework). Idaho CTE program information and statewide pathway standards are maintained by Idaho Career & Technical Education.
  • Dual credit / early college coursework (often delivered through Idaho postsecondary partners and statewide dual-credit mechanisms).
  • Advanced coursework (often including Advanced Placement (AP) and/or honors options, varying by high school size and staffing).

Program availability is campus-specific and changes with staffing and enrollment; district course catalogs and high school counseling offices are the authoritative sources.

School safety and student support resources (typical measures)

Across Idaho districts, standard K–12 safety and support practices commonly include:

  • Controlled entry procedures, visitor check‑in requirements, and staff training for emergencies
  • School Resource Officer (SRO) arrangements or coordination with local law enforcement (more common in larger schools)
  • Threat assessment and incident reporting protocols
  • School counseling services (academic planning, social-emotional support) and referrals to community mental health resources

District board policies and school handbooks are the primary documentation for Cassia County-specific safety measures and counseling staffing; these are usually published on district websites and updated annually.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment (most recent reporting)

Cassia County unemployment is tracked monthly by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (LAUS series) and state labor-market reports. The most recent annual averages for county unemployment can be pulled from:

In recent post‑pandemic years, Cassia County unemployment has generally remained low (around the low‑to‑mid single digits on an annual-average basis), consistent with much of southern Idaho.

Major industries and employment sectors

Cassia County’s employment base is commonly characterized by:

  • Agriculture (crop production, dairy and livestock operations)
  • Food processing and manufacturing linked to regional agricultural output
  • Transportation and warehousing (I‑84 corridor logistics)
  • Retail trade, education, and health services concentrated in Burley and surrounding communities
  • Construction tied to residential and agricultural/industrial facilities

These patterns align with industry mix reported in county profiles from the Idaho Department of Labor and ACS industry-by-occupation distributions on data.census.gov.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown (typical for the county)

Occupational concentrations commonly include:

  • Production and food-processing occupations
  • Transportation (truck driving and material moving)
  • Farming, fishing, and forestry (smaller share than total “ag-related” employment because many ag jobs appear in production/transport categories)
  • Sales and office support
  • Education and healthcare support roles (teachers, aides, nursing assistants, medical office roles)

County-level occupation shares are available through ACS occupation tables on data.census.gov.

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

  • Commute mode: The dominant mode is driving alone, with a smaller share carpooling; public transit commuting is minimal in most of rural Idaho.
  • Mean travel time to work: Cassia County’s mean commute time is generally around the low‑20‑minute range in recent ACS profiles, reflecting travel between rural areas and Burley or nearby employment centers.

Commute mode shares and mean travel time are reported in ACS commuting tables (e.g., “Means of Transportation to Work” and “Travel Time to Work”) on data.census.gov.

Local employment vs. out-of-county work

A substantial portion of workers are employed within the county (notably in Burley-area services, processing, and logistics), while another portion commutes along the I‑84 corridor to nearby counties for specialized jobs. The most direct measurement of “inflow/outflow” commuting (where workers live vs. where they work) is provided by the Census Bureau’s LEHD tools, including:

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership and rental share

Cassia County typically exhibits a high homeownership rate relative to urban areas, with owner-occupied housing generally around two‑thirds to roughly 70% of occupied units in recent ACS profiles, and renters making up the remainder. The definitive county shares are reported in ACS tenure tables on data.census.gov.

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median value of owner‑occupied housing: Recent ACS 5‑year estimates place Cassia County’s median home value below Idaho’s statewide median, reflecting a more rural market and lower density.
  • Trend: Like much of Idaho, Cassia County experienced rapid appreciation during 2020–2022 followed by slower growth and greater price sensitivity as interest rates rose (a regional proxy trend widely observed across southern Idaho markets). For transaction-based pricing (as distinct from ACS estimates), county-level housing market summaries are commonly compiled by regional MLS reports and state housing dashboards; ACS remains the most consistent public county statistic.

Median value (ACS) is available through data.census.gov.

Typical rent prices

  • Median gross rent: Recent ACS estimates generally place median gross rent in Cassia County in the lower range for Idaho, reflecting the rural/small-city market.
    ACS median gross rent and rent distributions are available via data.census.gov.

Housing types and built environment

Cassia County’s housing stock is dominated by:

  • Single‑family detached homes (Burley subdivisions and older in-town neighborhoods)
  • Manufactured homes (a meaningful share in many rural Idaho counties)
  • Smaller multifamily properties (apartments/duplexes), concentrated in Burley and near major corridors
  • Rural residential lots and farm-adjacent properties outside incorporated areas

ACS “Units in Structure” tables provide the county’s structure-type distribution on data.census.gov.

Neighborhood characteristics (amenities and proximity)

  • Burley concentrates county services (hospital/clinics, larger retail, public services), and many neighborhoods provide relatively short driving access to schools, parks, and commercial corridors.
  • Declo, Oakley, Albion, and unincorporated areas are more dispersed, with greater reliance on highway commuting for shopping, healthcare, and some school activities, and a stronger rural/agricultural setting.

Because neighborhood-level amenity proximity is not consistently published as a county dataset, these statements reflect the county’s settlement pattern and service concentration typical of rural county seats.

Property tax overview (rates and typical cost)

Idaho property taxes are administered locally and vary by taxing district (school, city, highway, fire, etc.). A county “average rate” is not a single uniform figure; effective tax rates vary by location and assessed value. In practice:

  • Typical effective property tax burden in Idaho is often cited around ~0.6%–0.8% of assessed value as a statewide-order proxy, with local variation.
  • The best authoritative sources for Cassia County-specific levies, billing, and typical homeowner tax examples are the Cassia County Assessor and Treasurer offices and annual levy disclosures.

County offices and general Idaho property tax administration references are available via Idaho State Tax Commission (state framework) and Cassia County’s own public pages (for local bills and levies).

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Idaho