Marengo County is located in west-central Alabama, within the Black Belt region and bordered by the Tombigbee River along its western edge. Established in 1818 and named for the Battle of Marengo, the county developed as part of Alabama’s historic cotton-growing belt, shaped by plantation agriculture and later by shifts toward diversified farming and forestry. Marengo County is small in population, with roughly 20,000–21,000 residents in recent estimates, and it remains predominantly rural. The landscape includes rolling Black Belt prairie soils, river lowlands, and extensive woodland, supporting agriculture, timber, and related industries alongside public-sector employment. Cultural life reflects Deep South and Black Belt traditions, with communities that retain strong local identities and longstanding historical ties. The county seat is Linden, and Demopolis is the county’s largest city and a regional center for services and commerce.

Marengo County Local Demographic Profile

Marengo County is located in west-central Alabama in the state’s Black Belt region, with major communities including Demopolis and Linden. The county is governed from Linden; for local government information and planning resources, visit the Marengo County official website.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Marengo County, Alabama, the county had an estimated population of 18,549 (2023).

Age & Gender

County-level age and sex distributions are published by the U.S. Census Bureau through the American Community Survey. For the latest standardized county profile tables, refer to:

Racial & Ethnic Composition

Race and Hispanic/Latino origin statistics are available in the county’s Census Bureau profile products. The most direct county compilation is provided in:

Household & Housing Data

Household composition and housing characteristics (such as number of households, average household size, homeownership, housing units, and occupancy) are published in the same Census Bureau county profile sources:

Email Usage

Marengo County is a largely rural county in Alabama’s Black Belt, where low population density and longer last‑mile distances can constrain fixed broadband buildout and, by extension, routine email access from home.

Direct, county-level email-usage statistics are not typically published, so broadband and device access are used as proxies for the ease of adopting and regularly using email. The U.S. Census Bureau (ACS) data portal reports household indicators such as broadband subscription and computer ownership that reflect the practical ability to use email reliably. Age structure also matters: the county’s age distribution (available through the same ACS tables) indicates the share of older adults, a group that, nationally, has lower rates of some digital communication behaviors than prime working-age adults, affecting overall adoption patterns. Gender composition is generally less predictive of email use than age and access, but county-level male/female distributions are available in ACS demographics for context.

Connectivity constraints are reflected in federal mapping and program data; the FCC National Broadband Map documents service availability and reported speeds, and the NTIA broadband programs track infrastructure investment intended to reduce coverage gaps.

Mobile Phone Usage

Marengo County is in west-central Alabama along the Tombigbee River, with the county seat in Linden and the largest city in Demopolis. It is predominantly rural with low population density and large areas of forest and agricultural land. These characteristics tend to produce wider distances between cell sites and more variable signal quality than in metropolitan Alabama, especially away from U.S. highways and town centers. Terrain in this part of Alabama is generally low-relief (no major mountains), so coverage constraints are more often driven by distance, land cover, and tower spacing than by steep topography.

Network availability (coverage) vs. adoption (use)

Network availability describes where mobile service is reported as deliverable (voice/data coverage by technology generation). Adoption describes whether households and individuals actually subscribe to mobile service, own smartphones, and use mobile data. These measures are not equivalent: areas can have reported 4G/5G availability but lower rates of smartphone ownership or mobile broadband subscription due to income, device affordability, and digital skills gaps.

Mobile penetration or access indicators (where available)

County-specific “mobile penetration” figures (for example, percent of residents with active mobile subscriptions) are not typically published at the county level in a standardized way. The most comparable, regularly updated county-level access indicators come from federal household surveys that measure device and subscription access:

  • Household telephone status (wireless-only vs. landline): Nationally standardized estimates are produced through the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), but these are generally not released at county granularity for most counties due to sample-size limitations. The main reference for wireless-only trend definitions and methodology is the CDC/NCHS program (not county-specific for Marengo). See CDC/NCHS wireless substitution (methodology and national/state context) at CDC NHIS documentation.
  • Computer and internet subscription access: The U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) provides county-level indicators such as broadband subscription, smartphone access, and device availability through “Computer and Internet Use.” These tables distinguish between types of internet subscriptions and devices but measure household access, not signal coverage. Use Census.gov ACS Computer and Internet Use as the authoritative source for county estimates and margins of error: American Community Survey (ACS) and data.census.gov.
    Limitation: ACS estimates are subject to sampling error; small-area device-type breakouts can have wide margins of error in low-population counties.

Mobile internet usage patterns (4G, 5G availability)

Reported 4G/5G availability (network-side)

County-level mobile network availability is most commonly represented through FCC coverage reporting and third-party modeled maps:

  • FCC Broadband Data Collection (BDC) provides provider-reported mobile broadband coverage by technology (including 4G LTE and 5G variants) and is the primary federal dataset for where mobile broadband is claimed to be available. The FCC map is the standard reference for availability and allows viewing by provider and technology. See the FCC National Broadband Map.
    Interpretation limitation: Mobile coverage polygons reflect reported service availability and do not guarantee consistent indoor coverage, speeds, or performance in sparsely populated areas.
  • Alabama’s statewide broadband planning and challenge processes often reference FCC BDC and complementary datasets. The state office is a key reference for statewide methodology and programs affecting rural counties. See the Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs (ADECA) (broadband initiatives and statewide context).

In practical terms for rural Alabama counties, 4G LTE is typically the baseline wide-area mobile data layer, with 5G availability more concentrated around population centers and primary corridors. Precise 5G presence and the type of 5G (low-band vs. mid-band) requires map confirmation through the FCC map and individual carrier coverage tools rather than generalized county statements.

Actual usage (adoption-side)

Mobile internet usage patterns at the county level are generally inferred from household subscription and device data rather than direct measurements of “mobile internet use”:

  • ACS subscription categories identify whether a household has cellular data plans, broadband such as cable/fiber/DSL, satellite, or other options. These data show the degree to which households rely on cellular data plans as their internet connection. County-level extraction is available via data.census.gov.
    Limitation: ACS measures subscription presence, not data consumption, network quality, or whether mobile is primary vs. supplemental beyond the categories provided.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

County-level device-type mix is best measured using ACS “Computer and Internet Use” tables, which distinguish among:

  • Smartphone
  • Tablet or other portable wireless computer
  • Desktop or laptop
  • Other devices (as categorized by ACS table structure)

These figures describe whether the household has access to those device types, not whether each resident owns one. In rural counties, smartphones frequently represent the most accessible internet-capable device because they combine the device and a subscription pathway; however, the extent of this in Marengo County specifically should be taken from ACS county estimates due to variability across rural counties. Primary sources are ACS documentation and county queries on data.census.gov.
Limitation: Device ownership within multi-person households is not fully captured; ACS records household-level access.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage

Rural settlement pattern and tower economics

  • Low density and dispersed housing increase per-user infrastructure cost, often resulting in fewer towers and more coverage gaps between towns and along less-traveled roads. This affects both availability (where a usable signal exists) and quality (signal strength/indoor penetration).
  • Land cover (forests and wetlands near river bottoms) can degrade signal at the margins, particularly for indoor service where site spacing is wider.

Income, age structure, and digital inclusion

  • Household income and poverty rates correlate with smartphone replacement cycles, the ability to maintain postpaid plans, and the likelihood of relying on prepaid or limited-data options. These are adoption-side constraints rather than network constraints.
  • Older age distribution can reduce smartphone uptake and mobile internet use intensity due to lower app adoption and digital skills on average. County-level demographic context is available through data.census.gov (ACS demographic and socioeconomic profiles). These variables help explain adoption differences even when coverage exists.

Transportation corridors and town centers

  • Mobile capacity and newer technologies are commonly densified in town centers (Demopolis, Linden) and along major roadways, while outlying areas may have fewer sites. This pattern is reflected in provider coverage layers and is evaluated most directly via the FCC National Broadband Map.
    Limitation: The FCC map provides availability claims rather than measured user experience; drive-test style county datasets are not consistently public.

Data limitations and what can be stated definitively

  • Definitive for availability: Provider-reported 4G/5G availability by location, as shown in the FCC National Broadband Map, is the standard federal reference for where mobile broadband is claimed to be offered in Marengo County.
  • Definitive for adoption/access: Household access to smartphones and cellular data plans, as well as other device types and subscription categories, is available as county estimates from the American Community Survey via data.census.gov.
  • Not consistently available at county level: Direct “mobile penetration” subscription counts, smartphone ownership per person, and granular mobile data usage (GB consumed, share of traffic on 4G vs. 5G) are not routinely published as standardized county-level public statistics for Marengo County.

Social Media Trends

Marengo County is in west-central Alabama along the Tombigbee River, with Demopolis and Linden among its notable population centers. The county’s largely rural settlement pattern, long travel distances to services, and a mix of public-sector, manufacturing, and resource-linked employment tend to align social media use with mobile-first internet access and community/news-driven sharing typical of non-metro areas in the Deep South.

User statistics (penetration / active use)

  • County-specific social media penetration is not published in standard national datasets; most reliable measures are reported at the U.S. or state/metro level rather than by county.
  • National benchmarks commonly used to approximate local patterns:
    • About 7 in 10 U.S. adults use at least one social media site (usage varies by age, education, and urbanicity) according to the Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
    • Social media use is generally higher among younger adults and somewhat lower in rural areas relative to urban/suburban areas, a pattern consistently shown across Pew’s internet and technology reporting (see Pew’s Internet & Technology research).

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

National age gradients are strong and are the most reliable basis for describing age-patterns in a county setting:

  • 18–29: Highest usage across most platforms; strong use of Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube.
  • 30–49: High overall usage; heavy Facebook and YouTube use; Instagram remains common.
  • 50–64: Moderate-to-high usage; Facebook and YouTube dominate.
  • 65+: Lowest overall usage, but meaningful Facebook and YouTube adoption. These patterns align with Pew’s platform-by-age distributions in the Pew social media fact sheet.

Gender breakdown

County-level gender splits are not reported in standard public datasets, but national survey findings show consistent tendencies:

  • Women are more likely than men to report using platforms oriented toward interpersonal connection and community sharing (notably Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest).
  • Men tend to be somewhat more represented on discussion/news and certain video/community platforms in some surveys, while YouTube is widely used across genders. For the most consistently cited, platform-by-demographic estimates, use Pew’s social media fact sheet.

Most-used platforms (percentages where available)

Reliable percentages are available nationally (adult usage) and are commonly used as reference points for counties without direct measurement:

  • YouTube and Facebook typically rank as the top two platforms by U.S. adult reach.
  • Instagram is a leading second-tier platform, especially strong among adults under 50.
  • TikTok has high reach among younger adults and parents with teens, with lower penetration among older groups.
  • Pinterest, LinkedIn, X (formerly Twitter), Snapchat, WhatsApp, and Reddit vary more sharply by age, education, and occupation. Platform-by-platform U.S. adult percentages and demographic breakdowns are summarized in the Pew Research Center social media fact sheet. For a complementary benchmark focused on marketing reach estimates (methodology differs from surveys), see DataReportal’s Digital 2024: United States.

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns / platform preferences)

Patterns most relevant to a rural Alabama county context, supported by broad U.S. research on platform behavior and news use:

  • Community and local-information use skews toward Facebook: local groups, event posts, church and school updates, and word-of-mouth sharing are commonly concentrated on Facebook in non-metro areas, reflecting Facebook’s broad adult reach (Pew: platform reach and demographics).
  • Video-first consumption is significant: YouTube’s high penetration nationally makes it a major channel for how-to content, music, news clips, and entertainment across age groups (Pew: YouTube usage).
  • Short-form video engagement is age-skewed: TikTok and Instagram Reels-style viewing is most concentrated among younger adults; older adults more often engage via Facebook feed and YouTube.
  • Messaging and sharing are mobile-centric: in rural settings, social media activity frequently tracks smartphone access and data plans, reinforcing photo/video sharing, direct messaging, and group-based coordination more than desktop-centric behaviors (general patterns discussed across Pew’s Internet & Technology publications).
  • News exposure via social platforms is common but uneven: social feeds remain a significant pathway to news for many Americans, with platform differences in how users encounter and share news (Pew’s news pathway research is indexed under News Habits & Media).

Family & Associates Records

Marengo County family-related public records include Alabama vital records (birth, death, marriage, and divorce) maintained at the state level by the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) Vital Records. Local recording functions for family-associated filings (such as marriage certificates and certain court-related domestic matters) are handled through county offices, including the Marengo County Circuit Clerk and the Marengo County Probate Judge. Adoption records are generally managed as confidential court records and are not treated as open public records.

Public online databases are limited for vital events; ADPH provides application-based ordering rather than an open searchable index. Some court information may be accessible through the statewide Alabama Court Information System (ACIS), which covers many Alabama courts and provides docket/case access under user terms.

Access typically occurs by requesting certified or informational copies from ADPH (mail/online ordering through ADPH’s vendor links) or by in-person requests at relevant county offices for locally recorded documents. Privacy restrictions commonly apply: birth certificates are restricted for a statutory period, adoption files are sealed, and many domestic-relations case details may be limited to parties or governed by court access rules.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

Marriage records

  • Marriage licenses: Issued by the Marengo County Probate Judge (Probate Court) as the county’s marriage-recording authority.
  • Marriage certificates (state record): Alabama maintains statewide marriage records through the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH), Center for Health Statistics. (Alabama’s marriage process changed in 2019 from licensing to recording standardized marriage certificates; older records are commonly indexed/kept as licenses and returns.)
  • Marriage record copies: County-level recorded instruments and state-issued certified copies are both used depending on the purpose.

Divorce and annulment records

  • Divorce decrees (final judgments of divorce): Entered by the Marengo County Circuit Court and filed in the circuit clerk’s office as part of the case record.
  • Annulments (judgments declaring a marriage void/voidable): Handled as a court matter and, when granted, recorded as part of the Circuit Court case file similar to other domestic-relations judgments.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

Marriages

  • Filed/recorded at the county level: Marriage records are maintained by the Marengo County Probate Judge as recorded instruments in probate records.
  • State-level vital record copy: ADPH maintains a statewide marriage record index and issues certified copies (commonly used for legal identification, benefits, and other official purposes).
  • Access methods:
    • Probate Court: Access is typically provided through in-person records search and copy requests; some counties also provide public terminals or limited online index access depending on local systems.
    • ADPH (Center for Health Statistics): Certified copies are requested through state vital records procedures and authorized request channels.

Divorces and annulments

  • Filed with the court: Divorce and annulment case records are filed with the Marengo County Circuit Clerk as part of the Circuit Court’s domestic-relations docket.
  • Access methods:
    • Circuit Clerk: Copies of final judgments/decrees are obtained through the clerk’s records unit by case number, party name, and/or date range. Older files may be archived.
    • State-level divorce verification: Alabama maintains divorce reporting through ADPH for certain periods as a verification record rather than the full decree; the court decree remains the authoritative document.

Typical information included in these records

Marriage licenses/certificates (county or state record)

Common fields include:

  • Full names of both parties (including prior/maiden names where provided)
  • Date of marriage (or date of recording, depending on record format and year)
  • Place of marriage/recording (county and state)
  • Ages or dates of birth (varies by era and form)
  • Residence addresses and/or counties of residence (varies by form and time period)
  • Officiant information and certification/acknowledgment (format varies)
  • Filing/recording references (book and page, instrument number, or similar indexing data)

Divorce decrees (final judgments)

Common components include:

  • Court name, county, case number, and filing/judgment dates
  • Names of the parties and date/place of marriage (often stated in pleadings and judgment)
  • Findings and orders dissolving the marriage
  • Orders addressing:
    • Division of marital property and debts
    • Spousal support (alimony) where applicable
    • Child custody, visitation, and child support where applicable
    • Name change orders (when granted)
  • Judge’s signature and clerk filing certification

Annulment judgments

Common components include:

  • Court, case number, party names, and judgment date
  • Findings regarding validity of the marriage and the legal basis for annulment
  • Orders concerning related issues (property, support, and children where applicable)
  • Judge’s signature and clerk filing certification

Privacy or legal restrictions

Public access and confidential content

  • Marriage records recorded by the Probate Court are generally treated as public records, subject to Alabama public records practices and local handling procedures.
  • Divorce and annulment case files are court records and are often accessible through the Circuit Clerk; however, specific documents or data elements may be restricted by:
    • Court orders sealing a case or portions of a case
    • Statutory confidentiality for protected information (for example, certain personal identifiers)
    • Confidential or protected proceedings involving minors or sensitive matters

Certified copies and identification requirements

  • State vital records copies (ADPH) are subject to state vital records rules, which typically limit issuance of certified copies to eligible requesters and require identity verification and fees. Non-certified informational copies and index access practices vary by program and time period.

Redaction and protected identifiers

  • Courts and record custodians commonly restrict disclosure of sensitive personal identifiers (such as full Social Security numbers) and may provide redacted copies consistent with court policy and applicable law.

Relevant authorities (official sources)

Education, Employment and Housing

Marengo County is in west‑central Alabama along the Tombigbee River, with its largest population centers in and around Demopolis and Linden. The county is predominantly rural with small-town service hubs, significant timber and agricultural land use, and a population that skews older than the U.S. average. Most current, standardized community indicators are published through the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) and federal labor statistics.

Education Indicators

Public schools (counts and names)

Marengo County is primarily served by Marengo County School District and Demopolis City Schools, with public-school listings and profiles maintained in the NCES (National Center for Education Statistics) directory. A consolidated, authoritative list of currently operating public schools and their official names is available via the NCES Public School Search (School Locator) by filtering for Marengo County, AL and district (Marengo County and Demopolis City).
Note: The exact count of operating schools can change with consolidation and grade reconfigurations; NCES provides the most recent federal directory entries.

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratios: Reported at the school and district level in NCES profiles; ratios vary by campus and grade span and are best referenced directly in the NCES school profiles for the most recent staffing year.
  • Graduation rates: Alabama publishes cohort graduation rates through the state report card system; the most comparable “on-time” graduation indicator is the four‑year cohort rate. District and high‑school graduation rates for Marengo County and Demopolis City are available through the Alabama State Department of Education Report Card.
    Proxy note: Where a single countywide graduation rate is needed, districts must be combined; the state report card remains the definitive source for each system.

Adult educational attainment (countywide)

Countywide adult education levels are most consistently available from the ACS 5‑year estimates (the standard for small-area county data). Key attainment measures (ages 25+) are published in ACS Table DP02 and related tables. The most recent estimates for Marengo County are accessible via data.census.gov (ACS 5‑year, Marengo County, AL), including:

  • High school diploma or equivalent (or higher)
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher
    Data note: ACS is the primary source for county educational attainment; single‑year ACS is typically not reliable for small counties.

Notable programs (STEM, CTE, AP)

Program availability is typically documented at the school level rather than countywide:

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE): Alabama districts commonly offer CTE pathways aligned to state career clusters; offerings for Marengo County and Demopolis schools are reflected in district/school course catalogs and in state CTE reporting. Statewide CTE framework information is maintained by the Alabama State Department of Education.
  • Advanced Placement (AP) / Dual Enrollment: AP participation and performance, where offered, are reported through the state report card at the high‑school level (and in some cases via school profiles). Dual enrollment is often coordinated with regional community colleges; availability varies by campus and year and is generally recorded in local course guides and state reporting.

School safety measures and counseling resources

Alabama school safety and student support practices are documented through district policies and state compliance frameworks (e.g., safety planning, threat assessment approaches, required reporting). School‑level staffing indicators (including counseling staff counts where reported) can be found in state report card detail pages and, for some staffing categories, in NCES staffing/characteristics fields. The most standardized, public-facing references are the Alabama Report Card school pages and district-published safety and student services information.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year available)

The most comparable official unemployment measure is the annual average Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) rate published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The latest county unemployment rates for Marengo County are available via the BLS LAUS program (county data).
Data note: The BLS publishes monthly and annual averages; annual average is typically used for community profiles.

Major industries and employment sectors

County industry composition is best summarized using ACS “industry by occupation” tables and the County Business Patterns framework for establishment counts (where available). In Marengo County’s regional context, major employment categories typically include:

  • Education, health care, and social assistance (schools, clinics, long‑term care)
  • Retail trade and accommodation/food services (small-town service economy)
  • Manufacturing (often including wood products and related production in timber regions, where present)
  • Public administration
  • Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting (more prominent than in metropolitan counties) Industry shares for employed residents are available through ACS industry tables on data.census.gov for Marengo County.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

ACS occupation groupings provide the standard breakdown for employed residents, typically including:

  • Management, business, science, and arts
  • Service occupations
  • Sales and office
  • Natural resources, construction, and maintenance
  • Production, transportation, and material moving
    The latest occupation distribution for Marengo County is available via ACS occupation tables (Marengo County, AL).

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

ACS commuting measures summarize how residents travel to work (drive alone, carpool, work from home, etc.) and the mean travel time to work. For Marengo County, these indicators are available in ACS Table DP03 and related commuting tables on data.census.gov.
Typical pattern proxy (rural West Alabama): Driving is the dominant mode; carpooling shares tend to be higher than large metros; mean commute times generally fall below major metro averages but can be elevated for residents commuting to jobs in larger nearby hubs.

Local employment versus out-of-county work

ACS “county-to-county commuting flows” and “place of work” indicators show the share of residents who work:

  • In Marengo County
  • Outside the county (often to neighboring counties with larger employment centers)
    The most standardized commuting-flow products are accessible through Census commuting datasets and ACS place-of-work tables; summary views can be built using data.census.gov and related Census commuting flow tools.
    Proxy note: Rural counties commonly have a substantial out‑commuting share due to limited local job density outside education/healthcare, government, and small-town retail/services.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership and renting

The ACS provides the standard county housing tenure split:

  • Owner‑occupied share (homeownership rate)
  • Renter‑occupied share
    These are published in ACS Table DP04 and related housing tables for Marengo County on data.census.gov.

Median property values and recent trends

ACS reports median value of owner‑occupied housing units and can be used to compare multi‑year changes (using successive ACS 5‑year releases). Marengo County median value estimates and value distribution bands are available via ACS housing value tables (Marengo County, AL).
Trend proxy note: In many rural Alabama counties, median values have risen in nominal terms in recent years, though levels remain well below statewide metro markets; ACS 5‑year comparisons provide the most stable view.

Typical rent prices

ACS reports:

  • Median gross rent
  • Gross rent as a percentage of household income
    These are available via ACS rent tables (Marengo County, AL).
    Data note: Private listing sites can be volatile and are not consistent countywide; ACS is the standard benchmark for typical rent levels.

Types of housing stock

ACS and Census housing characteristics indicate the housing mix, commonly including:

  • Single‑family detached homes (typically the dominant rural form)
  • Manufactured housing/mobile homes (often a notable share in rural counties)
  • Small multifamily/apartment structures, concentrated near town centers (e.g., Demopolis, Linden)
  • Rural lots and scattered homes outside municipal limits
    The unit-type distribution is available in ACS housing structure tables on data.census.gov.

Neighborhood characteristics and access to amenities

Countywide datasets generally do not score “neighborhoods” directly, but typical patterns are:

  • Town-center areas (Demopolis, Linden): closer proximity to schools, clinics, municipal services, and retail; more rentals and small multifamily properties.
  • Unincorporated/rural areas: larger parcels, longer travel distances to schools and services; higher reliance on personal vehicles.
    School locations and attendance zones are best verified through district materials and NCES mapping tools (school addresses and map links in the NCES locator).

Property tax overview (rate and typical homeowner cost)

Alabama property taxes are administered at the county level with assessment rules set by state law; effective tax burden is often summarized as property taxes paid in the ACS and in state/local revenue reporting. For Marengo County:

  • Median real estate taxes paid (owner‑occupied units) is available in ACS housing cost tables on data.census.gov.
  • Millage rates and assessment practices are documented through county revenue/assessor offices and Alabama property tax guidance; a consolidated statewide overview is maintained through Alabama tax administration resources (reference via the Alabama Department of Revenue).
    Proxy note: Alabama’s effective property tax rates are generally among the lowest in the U.S.; county-specific millage and exemptions determine typical annual bills for owner‑occupied homes.

Primary data sources used for the most recent standardized county indicators: U.S. Census Bureau (ACS 5‑year), BLS LAUS unemployment, Alabama State Department of Education Report Card, and NCES school directory.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Alabama