Lee County Local Demographic Profile
Lee County, Alabama – key demographics (latest Census Bureau estimates, primarily 2023 ACS 1-year and 2023 Population Estimates; values rounded)
Population size
- 2023 population estimate: ~187,000
- 2020 Census: 174,241
Age
- Median age: ~31
- Age distribution: Under 18: ~21%; 18–24: ~22%; 25–44: ~28%; 45–64: ~19%; 65+: ~11%
Gender
- Male: ~50%
- Female: ~50%
Racial/ethnic composition
- White (non-Hispanic): ~61%
- Black or African American: ~24%
- Asian: ~5%
- Two or more races: ~3%
- Hispanic or Latino (any race): ~6%
- Other (AIAN, NHPI, some other race): ~1%
Households
- Total households: ~70,000
- Average household size: ~2.4–2.5
- Family households: ~59% of households
- Married-couple households: ~45% of households
- Households with children under 18: ~26%
Insights
- Fast-growing since 2020, with a young age profile driven by Auburn University
- More racial/ethnic diversity (notably higher Asian and Hispanic shares) than the Alabama average
- Higher share of nonfamily and student-related households than typical Alabama counties
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2023 Population Estimates Program and 2023 American Community Survey (1-year) for Lee County, AL (rounded).
Email Usage in Lee County
Lee County, AL email landscape (2025):
- Estimated email users: ≈135,000 adult users (about 92% of ~147,000 adults), reflecting near-universal adoption.
- Age distribution of users: 18–24 ≈24%; 25–44 ≈33%; 45–64 ≈25%; 65+ ≈18%. Auburn University’s large student population raises the 18–24 share.
- Gender split: ≈51% female, 49% male among users (mirrors county demographics).
- Digital access trends:
- 95% of households have a computer (ACS 2018–2022).
- 89% of households have a broadband internet subscription (ACS 2018–2022), above the Alabama average.
- ~13% are smartphone‑only internet households, indicating mobile‑first access for a notable minority.
- Local density/connectivity facts:
- Connectivity is strongest in the Auburn–Opelika urban core and along the I‑85 corridor, with widespread gigabit fiber in city areas and robust 5G coverage from major carriers.
- Rural fringes show lower wireline speeds and greater reliance on fixed wireless/DSL, but coverage continues improving.
- Insights: Email usage is effectively universal among college‑age and working‑age adults and remains high among seniors due to healthcare, government, and banking communications; strong broadband and a large student/professional base drive heavy daily email engagement.
Mobile Phone Usage in Lee County
Lee County, Alabama — mobile usage snapshot (2025)
Headline user estimates (modeled from 2024–2025 national adoption benchmarks applied to ACS population and Lee County’s younger, college‑skewed demographics):
- Population base: ~180–185k residents; ~135–140k adults (18+)
- Smartphone users: ~120–128k adults (roughly 88–92% of adults), several points higher than Alabama overall due to the large student population and higher educational attainment
- Mobile‑only internet reliance (adult users who primarily use cellular as their main home connection): ~38–45k adults (about 28–33% of adults), higher than the state average; driven by renters, students, and lower‑income households in Auburn–Opelika
- 5G adoption: ~70–75% of smartphone users on 5G‑capable devices/plans, ahead of the state average because of faster device turnover in the student and professional segments
- Monthly mobile data use: county average aligns with national campus‑town norms (~24–30 GB per smartphone line per month), above Alabama’s statewide average; video streaming, gaming, and social/video creation near campus drive peaks
Demographic breakdown (how Lee County differs from Alabama overall)
- Age structure: Lee County skews younger (large 18–24 cohort anchored by Auburn University), which correlates with:
- Higher smartphone penetration and faster device replacement cycles
- Greater reliance on unlimited data plans and hotspot use
- Higher adoption of app‑centric services (mobile banking, rideshare, delivery)
- Household composition: Higher share of renters and multi‑tenant housing around Auburn–Opelika supports stronger uptake of mobile‑only internet and fixed‑wireless access (FWA) as alternatives to wired plans
- Education/income: Higher educational attainment than the state average supports:
- Higher iOS share and premium‑tier plan adoption
- Earlier uptake of 5G midband devices and bundled services
- Race/ethnicity: A more diverse user base than the Alabama average (notably a larger Asian student/academic segment) contributes to above‑average international messaging/VoIP use and demand for campus‑adjacent coverage
Digital infrastructure points (county specifics versus state patterns)
- 5G footprint:
- All three national carriers operate 5G across the Auburn–Opelika urban core, with midband capacity concentrated around campus, downtown corridors, and along I‑85/US‑280
- Countywide, 5G population coverage is high in the urban/suburban belt; rural edges still lean on low‑band 5G/LTE with occasional capacity constraints at peak times
- Capacity and backhaul:
- Dense macro‑site grid along I‑85 and major arterials; targeted small‑cell deployments near campus venues and high‑occupancy housing
- Robust fiber backhaul in the urban core, supported by university, municipal, and private fiber assets; this underpins better midband 5G performance than many Alabama counties of similar size
- Fixed wireless access (FWA):
- T‑Mobile and Verizon FWA are widely marketed in the Auburn–Opelika footprint; take‑up is above the state average among renters and student housing where flexible terms and self‑install are valued
- Coverage gaps:
- Service quality attenuates in lower‑density southern/eastern tracts of the county (terrain and tree cover), with fewer midband sectors; voice/SMS reliability remains solid, but sustained high‑throughput sessions dip during evening peaks
- Emergency capacity and events:
- Game days and events around Auburn University create predictable, localized capacity spikes; operators use temporary sectors and portable cells more frequently here than in comparable Alabama counties
What stands out versus Alabama overall
- Higher smartphone penetration and 5G device adoption, driven by a younger, more transient, and more educated user base
- Greater mobile‑only internet reliance and higher FWA adoption in the urban core, reducing dependence on traditional cable/DSL
- Better midband 5G availability and throughput around the campus/urban belt than is typical outside Alabama’s largest metros
- Data consumption per line runs higher than the statewide norm, with pronounced evening and event‑day peaks tied to student and entertainment use
Bottom line Lee County behaves like a college‑anchored metro pocket: fast device turnover, heavy mobile data use, high 5G adoption, and strong FWA uptake in multi‑tenant areas. Outside the Auburn–Opelika core, coverage is broad but more capacity‑constrained, reflecting a familiar urban‑rural split—yet overall, the county’s mobile experience is measurably ahead of Alabama’s average on adoption, speed, and flexibility.
Social Media Trends in Lee County
Lee County, AL social media snapshot (2025)
Headline user stats
- Adult social media penetration: approximately 80–85% of adults use at least one platform (anchored to Pew Research Center’s 2024 U.S. adult baseline; Lee County likely at the high end because of its unusually young population).
- Teens (13–17): roughly 95% use social media (Pew, 2023).
- Context: Auburn University enrolls ~33,000 students (2024), concentrating 18–24-year-olds in the county and pushing usage toward youth-dominant apps.
Most-used platforms (adult reach, Lee County estimate)
- YouTube: ~80–85%
- Facebook: ~60–70%
- Instagram: ~50–60%
- TikTok: ~40–50%
- Snapchat: ~35–45%
- LinkedIn: ~25–30%
- X (Twitter): ~20–25%
- Reddit: ~20–25% Notes:
- These ranges are locally adjusted from Pew’s 2024 U.S. adult adoption rates (YouTube 83%, Facebook 68%, Instagram 47%, TikTok 33%, Snapchat 27%, LinkedIn ~30%, X 22%, Reddit 22%), weighted upward where Lee County’s younger skew would lift usage (Instagram/TikTok/Snapchat).
Age groups and platform tendencies
- 13–17: Heavy on YouTube, TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram (Pew 2023 shows all four dominant among teens). Minimal Facebook use except for groups/events.
- 18–29: Highest intensity users. Pew 2024 shows very high YouTube (90%+), Instagram (75–80%), Snapchat (60–65%), TikTok (60%+), with Facebook still widely used (~55–60%). This cohort sets the tone in Lee County.
- 30–49: Broad multi-platform use; Facebook, YouTube, Instagram are primary; TikTok use is growing.
- 50+: Facebook and YouTube dominate; Instagram and TikTok are present but secondary.
Gender breakdown (directional)
- Women in Lee County tend to over-index on Facebook and Instagram (and Pinterest), aligning with national patterns.
- Men over-index on YouTube, Reddit, and X.
- LinkedIn skew is mixed but strong among graduate students, faculty, and professionals.
Behavioral trends (local)
- Student-driven cadence: Posting peaks Thu–Sat evenings; strong surges around Auburn home football games, Greek life, and campus events. Reels/TikTok short-form video performs best for local reach.
- Community information: Facebook Groups (buy/sell/trade, neighborhood and parenting groups) and Nextdoor are go-to channels for local services, safety notices, and municipal updates.
- City and county comms: Government, public safety, and schools see highest engagement on Facebook; emergency/weather updates spread quickly via Facebook and X.
- Local business engagement: Restaurants, bars, boutiques, coffee shops, and realtors see the best ROI on Instagram (Reels), TikTok, and Facebook Events; user-generated content (game-day outfits, dining, tailgating) is prevalent.
- Sports culture: Auburn athletics content drives cross-platform spikes (X for real-time chatter; Instagram for highlights; YouTube for longer recaps).
- Professional/academic networking: LinkedIn usage is strong among engineering, business, and health-science students and university staff; campus organizations cross-post to Instagram for recruitment.
Sources
- Pew Research Center: Social media use among U.S. adults (2024); Teens and social media (2023).
- Auburn University enrollment reports (2024).
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (latest available) for county demographics and age structure (used to localize national adoption rates).
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Alabama
- Autauga
- Baldwin
- Barbour
- Bibb
- Blount
- Bullock
- Butler
- Calhoun
- Chambers
- Cherokee
- Chilton
- Choctaw
- Clarke
- Clay
- Cleburne
- Coffee
- Colbert
- Conecuh
- Coosa
- Covington
- Crenshaw
- Cullman
- Dale
- Dallas
- De Kalb
- Elmore
- Escambia
- Etowah
- Fayette
- Franklin
- Geneva
- Greene
- Hale
- Henry
- Houston
- Jackson
- Jefferson
- Lamar
- Lauderdale
- Lawrence
- Limestone
- Lowndes
- Macon
- Madison
- Marengo
- Marion
- Marshall
- Mobile
- Monroe
- Montgomery
- Morgan
- Perry
- Pickens
- Pike
- Randolph
- Russell
- Saint Clair
- Shelby
- Sumter
- Talladega
- Tallapoosa
- Tuscaloosa
- Walker
- Washington
- Wilcox
- Winston