Houston County is located in the southeastern corner of Alabama, within the Wiregrass region along the Florida border. Created in 1903 from portions of Henry, Dale, and Geneva counties, it developed as a transportation and trade hub for surrounding agricultural communities. The county is mid-sized by Alabama standards, with a population of roughly 105,000 residents. Its county seat is Dothan, the area’s principal city and an important regional center for commerce, health care, and education. Outside Dothan, much of the county is characterized by rural landscapes, including pine forests, farmland, and low, rolling terrain typical of the Gulf Coastal Plain. Agriculture—particularly peanuts, cotton, and poultry—has historically shaped the local economy and remains influential alongside manufacturing and service industries. Cultural and economic ties reflect broader Wiregrass connections across southeast Alabama, southwest Georgia, and the Florida Panhandle.

Houston County Local Demographic Profile

Houston County is located in southeastern Alabama in the Wiregrass region, anchored by the city of Dothan near the Alabama–Florida–Georgia area. The county is administered from Dothan; for local government and planning resources, visit the Houston County official website.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau’s data portal (data.census.gov), Houston County, Alabama had a total population of 105,882 in the 2020 Decennial Census (Census Bureau table series: Decennial Census, Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171)).

Age & Gender

County-level age distribution and gender ratio are published by the U.S. Census Bureau in the American Community Survey (ACS). The most commonly cited profile is the ACS 5-year “Demographic and Housing Estimates” table DP05 for Houston County, available via data.census.gov (search: “Houston County, Alabama DP05”).

Exact age-group shares and the male/female breakdown are not provided in this response because the specific ACS vintage (year range) was not specified, and values differ by release.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

Houston County’s race and Hispanic/Latino origin counts are published by the U.S. Census Bureau in:

  • The 2020 Decennial Census Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171), and
  • The ACS 5-year profile table DP05.

These county-level figures are accessible through the U.S. Census Bureau data portal (search terms: “Houston County Alabama P2 race” for decennial race tables; “Houston County Alabama DP05” for ACS race/ethnicity profile outputs).

Exact race/ethnicity percentages are not included here because the table selection (Decennial vs. ACS) and/or ACS vintage was not specified, and reported percentages vary by dataset and release.

Household and Housing Data

Household and housing characteristics for Houston County are published by the U.S. Census Bureau in the ACS 5-year tables commonly used for local profiles, including:

  • DP04 (Selected Housing Characteristics) for housing units, occupancy, tenure (owner/renter), and housing structure type
  • S1101 (Households and Families) for household counts and household type distributions

These tables are available through data.census.gov (search: “Houston County Alabama DP04” and “Houston County Alabama S1101”).

Exact household totals, average household size, and housing tenure rates are not included in this response because the ACS vintage was not specified, and values vary by release.

Email Usage

Houston County, Alabama is anchored by Dothan but includes substantial rural areas where lower population density can reduce the economic incentive for last‑mile broadband buildout, shaping reliance on mobile connectivity for digital communication such as email.

Direct, county-level email-usage rates are not routinely published; broadband and device access are commonly used proxies because email adoption depends on reliable internet service and access to a computer or smartphone. The U.S. Census Bureau (data.census.gov) provides Houston County indicators from the American Community Survey on household broadband subscriptions and computer access, which summarize the local capacity to use email consistently (especially for job applications, schooling, and government services).

Age structure influences email adoption because older populations tend to have lower digital adoption and higher accessibility needs. Houston County’s age distribution can be referenced through ACS demographic tables, which support interpreting likely variations in email use by cohort.

Gender distribution is available in Census sex-by-age profiles, but it is generally a weaker driver of email access than age, income, and connectivity.

Infrastructure limitations are reflected in broadband availability and technology types reported through the FCC National Broadband Map.

Mobile Phone Usage

Houston County is located in southeastern Alabama along the Florida–Alabama line, anchored by the City of Dothan (a regional hub for healthcare, retail, and services). The county includes urbanized areas around Dothan and more rural communities elsewhere, with generally flat Coastal Plain terrain and extensive agricultural land use. These characteristics typically produce strong coverage in and near population centers and along major road corridors, with more variable service quality in lower-density rural areas. Population and housing context is documented by the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Houston County.

Key definitions (availability vs adoption)

  • Network availability refers to whether mobile broadband service is reported as present in an area (coverage), and at what technology level (4G LTE, 5G).
  • Adoption refers to whether households or individuals actually subscribe to and use mobile service and/or mobile internet, including “cellular data only” internet service at home.

County-level availability is more consistently published than county-level adoption. Adoption measures are often available only at broader geographies (state, metro area, or survey regions), or as modeled estimates.

Mobile network availability (coverage and technology)

FCC Broadband Data Collection (primary availability source)

The most authoritative public dataset for reported mobile broadband availability in the U.S. is the FCC’s Broadband Data Collection (BDC). It provides provider-submitted coverage by technology and speed tiers, including mobile LTE and 5G. The FCC’s tools and data downloads can be used to view and extract reported availability for Houston County, including differences between coverage in the Dothan area versus less dense parts of the county:

What the FCC availability data can support for Houston County

  • Identification of which mobile providers report coverage in the county.
  • Differentiation of 4G LTE vs 5G (and in some cases 5G categories, depending on FCC reporting structure at the time of download).
  • A way to compare availability footprint across the county, noting that reported coverage often appears more complete in towns, along highways, and near developed corridors than in sparsely populated areas.

Limitations of FCC availability data

  • FCC BDC availability reflects provider-reported coverage, not guaranteed indoor performance or consistent user experience.
  • The map does not directly measure real-world throughput, congestion, or signal quality at specific addresses.

State and regional planning references

Alabama’s statewide broadband planning materials can provide context on gaps between urban centers and rural areas, though these documents typically focus more on fixed broadband than mobile:

Actual adoption and mobile access indicators (households and individuals)

U.S. Census Bureau household internet subscription indicators

The U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) is the standard public source for household internet adoption indicators, including households with a cellular data plan as their internet subscription (often interpreted as “mobile-only” home internet use when it is the sole subscription type reported).

County-level ACS tables can be accessed through:

How to interpret ACS adoption measures for Houston County

  • ACS can quantify household shares for internet subscription categories (including cellular data plans), which provides an adoption lens distinct from network availability.
  • ACS measures are household subscription types, not direct measures of signal coverage, speed, or reliability.
  • Year-to-year variation can occur due to sampling; multi-year estimates are often used for smaller geographies.

Smartphone ownership and device adoption (county limitations)

Publicly available smartphone ownership shares are typically measured through national surveys (e.g., Pew Research) and are not consistently published at the county level. For county-level analysis, the most defensible public indicators are ACS household subscription categories (including cellular data plans) rather than direct device-type penetration. As a result:

  • County-level smartphone vs non-smartphone device shares are generally not directly observable in standard federal datasets.
  • Device type inferences should not be made without a published county-level source.

Mobile internet usage patterns (4G/5G availability vs usage)

Availability (4G/5G)

  • 4G LTE is broadly reported nationwide and is typically the baseline mobile broadband layer in both urban and rural areas; Houston County’s specific LTE footprint and providers are best represented through the FCC National Broadband Map.
  • 5G availability is also reported in the FCC map and is generally most continuous in and around denser population centers and major transport corridors; county-specific extent and providers should be derived from FCC BDC.

Usage (who uses mobile internet and how)

County-specific, directly measured “usage patterns” (hours, app types, share using 5G vs LTE) are rarely available from public sources at the county level. The most defensible public approach is to separate:

  • Network capability and footprint (FCC availability) from
  • Household adoption indicators (ACS internet subscription categories, including cellular data plan usage).

Common device types (smartphones vs other devices)

Public data that cleanly separates smartphones from other mobile-capable devices (feature phones, tablets with cellular, hotspots) is limited at the county level. The following evidence base is typically used:

  • Household “cellular data plan” internet subscription (ACS): indicates reliance on cellular networks for home internet access, but does not specify whether the access is via smartphone tethering, a dedicated hotspot, or another cellular-enabled device.
  • National survey benchmarks (not county-specific): useful for general U.S. context but not definitive for Houston County.

Because Houston County-specific device mix is not consistently published in public datasets, definitive county shares for smartphone ownership versus other devices are a documented limitation.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity

Population distribution and development pattern

  • The presence of Dothan as an urbanized center generally supports denser tower placement, more consistent indoor coverage, and faster adoption of newer technologies relative to surrounding rural areas.
  • Outside the Dothan core, lower population density and greater distances between communities can reduce the economic incentive for dense infrastructure, influencing both availability (coverage footprint) and service quality (capacity and indoor performance). This is a structural factor observed in rural/urban telecom planning and is typically reflected in FCC availability patterns.

Socioeconomic factors linked to adoption (measured through ACS)

ACS tables support analysis of:

  • Household income and poverty indicators
  • Age distribution
  • Educational attainment
  • Household internet subscription categories (including cellular data plans)

These variables can be examined together on data.census.gov to describe how adoption differs by household characteristics, while maintaining a clear distinction from network availability.

Terrain and land use

Houston County’s generally flat terrain reduces the likelihood of terrain-shadowing compared with mountainous regions, but land use patterns (spread-out housing, agricultural areas, wooded tracts) and building materials still affect signal propagation and indoor reception. This factor influences real-world experience more than reported outdoor coverage, and it is not fully captured in FCC availability layers.

Summary of what is measurable at the county level (and what is not)

  • Measurable / publicly documented for Houston County

  • Commonly not available as definitive county-level public statistics

    • Smartphone ownership rate (smartphone vs feature phone) as a direct county estimate
    • Direct measures of 5G vs LTE actual usage share, app usage, or device capability mix
    • Performance/quality metrics (congestion, indoor reliability) as official countywide figures in the FCC availability dataset

These limitations are inherent to the way mobile coverage and adoption data are collected and published in the United States, making it essential to present availability (FCC) and adoption (ACS) as separate, non-interchangeable measures.

Social Media Trends

Houston County is in southeast Alabama on the Florida–Georgia corridor, anchored by Dothan (a regional retail, healthcare, and logistics hub often linked to the “Wiregrass” area) and a mix of suburban and rural communities. This geography typically aligns local social media use with broader U.S. patterns: high mobile-first usage, strong reliance on Facebook for community information, and heavy YouTube consumption for entertainment and how-to content.

User statistics (penetration / active use)

  • County-specific social media penetration: No regularly published, statistically representative dataset reports platform-by-platform active-user penetration specifically for Houston County. Most reliable measures are available at the U.S. national and sometimes state level rather than county level.
  • Best available benchmark (U.S. adults): About 7 in 10 U.S. adults (≈69%) use at least one social media site, based on Pew Research Center’s Social Media Use in 2023. Houston County usage is commonly proxied using this national baseline in the absence of county estimates.
  • Internet access as a practical ceiling: Social platform use is bounded by local broadband/mobile availability; for context on Alabama connectivity patterns, see the FCC National Broadband Map (location-based availability rather than social usage).

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

Using the same Pew benchmark (U.S. adults):

  • 18–29: ~84% use social media (highest)
  • 30–49: ~81%
  • 50–64: ~73%
  • 65+: ~45% (lowest)
    Source: Pew Research Center.
    Interpretation for Houston County: A regional hub county with a large service economy and commuting patterns typically shows the strongest intensity among working-age adults (18–49), while older adults remain more concentrated on a narrower set of platforms (notably Facebook).

Gender breakdown

  • Overall social media use by gender (U.S. adults): Pew’s reporting generally finds modest gender differences in overall social media adoption, with platform-level differences more pronounced than “any social media” use.
    Primary reference: Pew Research Center’s social media use report.
  • Platform-skew patterns (U.S. adults):
    • Pinterest tends to skew female
    • Reddit tends to skew male
    • Facebook and YouTube tend to be relatively broad across genders
      Source: Pew platform detail tables in the same report.

Most-used platforms (percent of U.S. adults; local county-level figures not published)

Percentages below are U.S. adult usage (benchmarking for Houston County in lieu of county measures), from Pew Research Center:

  • YouTube: ~83%
  • Facebook: ~68%
  • Instagram: ~47%
  • Pinterest: ~35%
  • TikTok: ~33%
  • LinkedIn: ~30%
  • X (Twitter): ~22%
  • Snapchat: ~27%
  • WhatsApp: ~29%
    Local implication: In counties with strong community institutions (schools, churches, local sports, civic groups) and mixed rural/suburban areas, Facebook Groups and local pages often function as a high-frequency information channel, while YouTube remains the broadest-reach video platform.

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)

  • Facebook for local/community information: Facebook usage is commonly associated with local news sharing, event coordination, school and sports updates, and buy/sell activity (often via Groups). Pew documents Facebook’s broad reach among adults and sustained usage among older cohorts: Pew Research Center.
  • Short-form video growth: TikTok and Instagram Reels align with higher usage among younger adults; Pew’s platform penetration by age shows steep drop-offs with age for TikTok compared with Facebook/YouTube: Pew.
  • YouTube as universal, cross-age media: YouTube combines entertainment, local-interest viewing (sports highlights, community content), and practical “how-to” use. Its reach is highest overall in Pew’s platform list.
  • Messaging and private sharing: A meaningful share of “social” activity occurs through direct messages and group chats (including Messenger/WhatsApp), which can reduce visible public posting while maintaining high engagement time.
  • Engagement tends to be mobile-first: In areas with rural stretches and commuting, engagement patterns frequently emphasize mobile browsing, video consumption, and quick interactions (likes/comments/shares) rather than long-form posting, consistent with broader U.S. usage documented in national surveys such as Pew’s social media report.

Family & Associates Records

Houston County family and associate-related public records primarily include vital records and court records. Alabama vital records (birth and death certificates) are recorded at the state level by the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) Center for Health Statistics; local issuance and assistance are commonly available through county health departments, including the Houston County Health Department. Marriage records are maintained by the state; Alabama uses a marriage certificate process filed with the probate court, with county-level filing commonly handled through the Houston County Probate Office and statewide guidance available from the ADPH Marriage Certificates page. Divorce, adoption, guardianship, and related family-court matters are maintained as court records; access points include the Houston County Circuit Clerk.

Public online databases for Alabama court case lookup are limited; statewide electronic access is commonly provided through AlaCourt (subscription) and the Alabama Judicial System portal for court information. In-person access typically occurs at the Probate Office and Circuit Clerk’s office for filings and copies, and through ADPH for certified vital records.

Privacy restrictions commonly apply: birth certificates are restricted for a set period, adoption files are generally sealed, and some court records may be confidential or redacted by law or court order.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

Marriage records

  • Marriage license applications and issued licenses: Created and recorded at the county level as part of the marriage licensing process.
  • Marriage certificates/returns: Proof that a ceremony was performed and the marriage was completed, typically recorded after the officiant returns the executed license.
  • State marriage record (certificate data): Maintained by the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH), Center for Health Statistics, based on the filed marriage information.

Divorce records

  • Divorce decrees (final judgments): Court orders ending a marriage, issued by the circuit court.
  • Divorce case files: May include pleadings, agreements, child support and custody orders, property division orders, and related motions and exhibits, subject to court rules and sealing.

Annulment records

  • Annulment decrees/orders: Court orders declaring a marriage void or voidable, maintained as part of the circuit court’s domestic-relations records.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

Houston County marriage records (local)

  • Filed/recorded with: Houston County Probate Court (marriage licensing/recording).
  • Access: Requests are commonly handled by the probate court/records office. Availability of certified copies and search methods depend on the probate court’s procedures.

Alabama marriage records (state)

  • Filed/maintained with: Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH), Center for Health Statistics.
  • Access: ADPH issues certified copies under state vital-records rules. Information and ordering are provided by ADPH: https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/vitalrecords/.

Houston County divorce and annulment records (local)

  • Filed/maintained with: Houston County Circuit Court (Domestic Relations); court record-keeping is generally administered through the circuit clerk’s office.
  • Access: Copies are obtained through the circuit clerk/court records processes. Some basic case information may be available through Alabama’s online court-record portal where applicable: https://alacourt.com/.

Alabama divorce records (state)

Typical information included in these records

Marriage license/certificate records

  • Full names of spouses (including maiden name where recorded)
  • Date and place of marriage (county; sometimes city/venue)
  • Date the license was issued and date the marriage was solemnized/returned
  • Ages or dates of birth (varies by form and era)
  • Residences and/or birthplaces (varies)
  • Officiant name and title; sometimes congregation/organization
  • Witnesses (where required by the form used)
  • Recording information (book/page or instrument number)

Divorce/annulment decrees and case files

  • Names of the parties and case number
  • Date of filing and date of final judgment/decree
  • Grounds or legal basis (sometimes stated; sometimes incorporated by reference)
  • Orders on marital status (divorce granted; marriage annulled/declared void)
  • Orders on custody, visitation, child support, and medical support (where applicable)
  • Orders on alimony/spousal support (where applicable)
  • Property division and debt allocation; name restoration (where applicable)

ADPH divorce certificates (state-level vital record)

  • Names of parties
  • Date and county of divorce
  • Court granting the divorce (often identified by county/court)
  • Limited statistical/certificate fields compared with the full court file

Privacy or legal restrictions

  • Vital records (ADPH): Certified copies are issued under Alabama vital-records laws and administrative rules; access is restricted to eligible requestors and typically requires identification and payment of statutory fees. ADPH publishes current eligibility and identification requirements: https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/vitalrecords/.
  • Court records (divorce/annulment): Many divorce and annulment records are public court records in principle, but confidential information may be protected by law or court order. Courts may restrict access to:
    • Records involving minors, adoption-related matters, or sensitive custody evaluations
    • Documents containing protected personal identifiers (social security numbers, financial account numbers)
    • Materials sealed by judicial order (for example, certain exhibits, reports, or settlement terms)
  • Redaction and sealing: Alabama courts and clerks follow applicable rules and orders governing redaction of personal data and sealing of records; access to sealed portions generally requires a court order.

Education, Employment and Housing

Houston County is in southeastern Alabama on the Florida–Georgia regional corridor, anchored by Dothan (the county seat and primary job center). The county is largely suburban-to-rural in settlement pattern, with most population and services concentrated around Dothan and major highway corridors (notably US‑231/431). Community context is shaped by healthcare, retail/services, and manufacturing/logistics activity tied to the Wiregrass region.

Education Indicators

Public schools (counts and names)

Public K–12 education is primarily delivered by two districts: Dothan City Schools and Houston County Schools. A consolidated, authoritative list of campuses is maintained by each district:

Because campus openings/closures and grade configurations change over time, the most accurate “number of public schools and names” is the current district directory listings above (used as the best available definitive source for school names).

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratio (county-level proxy): County- and district-level ratios are commonly reported via federal and state education profiles; the most consistently comparable reference is the U.S. Census Bureau’s county profile and district/state reporting. The latest county profile is accessible through the Census county page for Houston County (Houston County, AL—Census data profile).
  • Graduation rate (district/school-level): Alabama publishes cohort graduation rates at the district and school level through the state report card system (Alabama State Department of Education Report Card). This is the definitive source for the most recent graduation rates for Dothan City and Houston County high schools.

Note: A single “Houston County graduation rate” is not always reported as one combined figure because graduation rates are tracked by district/school; the state report card provides the most recent official rates.

Adult educational attainment

Adult educational attainment is most consistently reported through the American Community Survey (ACS) in the Census profile:

  • High school diploma or higher (age 25+): Reported in the ACS county profile (Houston County educational attainment—ACS).
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher (age 25+): Also reported in the same ACS tables (Educational Attainment).

These indicators are updated annually in ACS 1‑year (for larger geographies) and 5‑year estimates (standard for county comparisons), and the Census profile page presents the most recent available release for the county.

Notable programs (STEM, career/technical, AP)

  • Career and technical education (CTE): Both districts offer CTE pathways aligned with Alabama’s career clusters; Alabama’s statewide CTE framework is administered through the Alabama Department of Education (Alabama Achieves / ALSDE).
  • Advanced Placement (AP)/dual enrollment: AP participation and performance, along with other college- and career-readiness indicators, are typically displayed in the Alabama Report Card for each high school (ALSDE Report Card—college and career readiness indicators).
  • STEM/program emphasis: STEM offerings are generally embedded within district course catalogs, academies, and CTE programs; the most definitive, current program listings are posted by each district (Dothan City Schools; Houston County Schools).

School safety measures and counseling resources

  • Safety planning and required protocols are governed by state and local policy and are reflected in district handbooks and safety communications (including visitor management, emergency drills, and coordinated response planning). District policy/handbook materials are maintained on district sites (Dothan City Schools; Houston County Schools).
  • Student supports (counseling/mental health): School counseling is a standard service in Alabama public schools; campus counseling staff and student services are typically listed under student support services on district/school pages and in state program guidance (Alabama Achieves / ALSDE student support frameworks).

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year available)

The official unemployment rate is tracked by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS). The most recent annual and monthly rates for Houston County are available via:

  • BLS LAUS (county unemployment)
    Note: LAUS provides the definitive “most recent year available” and can be read as the latest annual average (commonly used for year-to-year comparison) and the latest month (for current conditions).

Major industries and employment sectors

Industry composition for residents (by where employed, not necessarily where businesses are located) is most consistently reported in ACS:

  • Healthcare and social assistance, retail trade, educational services, manufacturing, and accommodation/food services are typically among the largest employment sectors in Wiregrass-region county profiles, with public administration also present due to local government and public services. The definitive sector shares for Houston County are in the Census profile (Houston County—industry by occupation/industry tables).

For employer-based context, Dothan functions as the regional hub for healthcare, retail, logistics, and manufacturing activity serving surrounding counties.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

ACS provides occupational distribution such as:

  • Management/business/science/arts
  • Service occupations
  • Sales and office
  • Natural resources/construction/maintenance
  • Production/transportation/material moving

The latest occupational shares are reported in the Census county profile (Houston County—occupation tables).

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

Commute indicators (share driving alone, carpooling, remote work, public transit, walk/bike) and mean travel time to work are reported in ACS:

In southeastern Alabama counties with a central city and outlying rural areas, commuting is typically dominated by private vehicles, with a notable share of cross-county commuting toward the main employment hub (Dothan) and along major highways.

Local employment vs out-of-county work

ACS “commute to work” data does not directly label “in-county vs out-of-county employment” for every table view, but county-to-county commuting flows are measured in Census commuting products. A commonly used federal tool for inflow/outflow and commuting patterns is:

This provides definitive counts of residents working inside Houston County versus commuting to other counties, and workers commuting into Houston County for jobs (inflow).

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership rate and rental share

Homeownership and tenure (owner-occupied vs renter-occupied) are reported in ACS:

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units is reported in ACS (Houston County—median home value).
  • Recent trends: County-level price trends are often tracked through multi-listing and private indexes, but the most consistent public trend proxy is comparing ACS median value across releases (noting ACS is survey-based and can lag market changes). This comparison is anchored in the Census profile time series.

Typical rent prices

Types of housing stock

Housing structure types (single-family detached, single-family attached, 2–4 unit, 5+ unit apartments, mobile homes) are reported in ACS:

Houston County’s built environment generally reflects:

  • Single-family detached homes as the dominant form in suburban and rural areas
  • Apartment complexes and smaller multifamily concentrated in and around Dothan
  • Manufactured housing and rural lots more common outside the urban core

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools/amenities)

Countywide, proximity to schools, hospitals/clinics, shopping, and civic services tends to increase nearer to Dothan and along major corridors, while outlying areas have more rural spacing and longer drive times to services. For definitive school locations and attendance information, district directories and zoning/registration guidance are maintained by each district (Dothan City Schools; Houston County Schools).

Property tax overview (average rate and typical homeowner cost)

Property tax administration is handled locally with state rules. The most authoritative overview for county millage, assessment, and payment is maintained by county revenue/assessment offices and Alabama Department of Revenue guidance:

For Houston County-specific millage rates and assessment details, the county’s revenue/assessment resources provide the definitive figures (rates vary by city limits, school tax districts, and special levies). Typical homeowner tax cost is the product of assessed value (Alabama assessment ratios vary by property class) and the applicable millage; therefore, a single countywide “average tax bill” is not consistently definitive without specifying jurisdiction and property class.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Alabama