Franklin County is located in northwestern Alabama along the Mississippi state line, within the Tennessee Valley region. Established in 1818 and named for Benjamin Franklin, it is one of the state’s older counties and developed historically around agriculture and small-town trade. Franklin County is small in population by Alabama standards, with roughly 32,000 residents. The county is predominantly rural, characterized by forested hills, farmland, and waterways influenced by the nearby Tennessee River system. Economic activity has traditionally centered on farming, poultry and livestock production, light manufacturing, and local services. Communities are dispersed, with cultural life shaped by North Alabama traditions, including church-centered civic activity and regional music and foodways. The county seat is Russellville, which serves as the primary administrative and commercial center.

Franklin County Local Demographic Profile

Franklin County is located in northwestern Alabama along the Mississippi state line, within the broader Tennessee Valley region of the state. Its county seat is Russellville, and the county includes smaller communities such as Red Bay and Phil Campbell.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Franklin County, Alabama, the county had:

  • Population (2020 Census): 31,704
  • Population estimate (July 1, 2023): 31,489

Age & Gender

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Franklin County, Alabama:

  • Persons under 18 years: 22.0%
  • Persons 65 years and over: 18.7%
  • Female persons: 50.8%
    (Male persons: 49.2%)

Racial & Ethnic Composition

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Franklin County, Alabama (most recent vintage shown on QuickFacts):

  • White alone: 87.1%
  • Black or African American alone: 3.7%
  • American Indian and Alaska Native alone: 0.6%
  • Asian alone: 0.6%
  • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone: 0.1%
  • Two or more races: 7.9%
  • Hispanic or Latino (of any race): 5.2%

Household & Housing Data

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Franklin County, Alabama:

  • Households (2018–2022): 12,089
  • Average household size (2018–2022): 2.55
  • Owner-occupied housing unit rate (2018–2022): 77.6%
  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units (2018–2022, in 2022 dollars): $138,100
  • Median gross rent (2018–2022, in 2022 dollars): $708
  • Housing units (2020 Census): 14,181

For local government and planning resources, visit the Franklin County official website.

Email Usage

Franklin County, Alabama is largely rural with low population density, making last‑mile internet buildout and service competition more limited than in urban areas; these factors shape how reliably residents can access email.

Direct county-level email usage statistics are not published, so email access trends are inferred from proxy indicators such as household broadband subscriptions, computer availability, and age structure reported by the U.S. Census Bureau (data.census.gov) and summarized through QuickFacts for Franklin County. Broadband subscription and computer access rates indicate the practical capacity to use webmail or app-based email at home; gaps in these measures generally correspond to lower routine email adoption and more reliance on mobile-only access.

Age distribution is relevant because older populations tend to have lower adoption of online account management and email-based services; county age profiles from the Census help contextualize expected adoption patterns. Gender distribution is typically less predictive of email usage than age and connectivity, but county sex composition is available via the same Census sources.

Connectivity limitations are commonly tied to sparse settlement patterns and infrastructure coverage, documented in federal broadband mapping such as the FCC National Broadband Map.

Mobile Phone Usage

Franklin County is located in northwestern Alabama along the Mississippi state line, with the county seat in Russellville. The county is predominantly rural, with widely spaced settlements, forested and agricultural land uses, and variable topography (including areas near the Bankhead National Forest and the Tennessee River region). These characteristics generally increase the cost and complexity of building dense mobile networks compared with more urban counties, and they influence both signal reach and the practical availability of high-capacity backhaul. Population and housing characteristics for the county are documented through Census.gov and county profiles published by the State of Alabama and local government sources.

Key distinction: network availability vs. adoption

Network availability refers to whether mobile providers report coverage (voice/LTE/5G) in a given area, typically summarized as geographic coverage. Adoption refers to whether residents actually subscribe to mobile service and use mobile broadband, and whether households rely on mobile as their primary internet connection. County-level adoption and “mobile-only household internet” rates are often available only through surveys or modeled datasets, and many public sources provide these metrics at the state level or for larger geographies rather than for a single county.

Mobile penetration or access indicators (county availability and limits)

  • County-specific mobile subscription (“penetration”) rates are not consistently published in a standardized public dataset for Franklin County. The most comparable public metrics tend to be:
    • American Community Survey (ACS) household internet subscription categories (e.g., cellular data plan, broadband such as cable/fiber/DSL) via Census.gov. ACS tables can identify households with cellular data plans and those that are cellular-only versus those that also subscribe to fixed broadband, but availability and margins of error can be limiting for smaller geographies.
    • Modeled broadband availability and adoption summaries used by state broadband programs. Alabama’s statewide planning and funded deployment tracking are coordinated through the Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs (ADECA), including broadband program materials and maps that contextualize mobile and fixed connectivity.
  • FCC availability reporting is the primary federal source for provider-reported coverage and service availability; it is not a direct measure of household subscriptions. The FCC’s data and maps are accessible through the FCC National Broadband Map and related documentation on the FCC Broadband Data Collection program.

Mobile internet usage patterns and connectivity (4G/5G availability)

Network availability (reported coverage)

  • 4G LTE: In rural Alabama counties, LTE is typically the baseline mobile broadband layer where service exists. Provider-reported LTE coverage can be examined at the address/location level and summarized geographically using the FCC National Broadband Map. Franklin County’s coverage varies by terrain, tower spacing, and proximity to highways and population centers (e.g., Russellville and major routes).
  • 5G: 5G availability in rural counties is commonly uneven, with coverage more likely in and near towns, along major road corridors, and where mid-band deployments have occurred; in more remote or rugged areas, service may remain LTE-only or rely on lower-band 5G layers with performance closer to LTE. Provider-reported 5G layers (including technology and advertised speeds where reported) are available through the FCC National Broadband Map.
  • Important limitation: FCC availability data is based on provider filings and reflects where providers claim service is available, not guaranteed indoor coverage or consistent performance at all times.

Actual usage (adoption and reliance on mobile data)

  • County-level patterns of mobile internet reliance are best approximated through ACS household subscription data (cellular plan vs fixed broadband) on Census.gov. These data indicate how many households report having:
    • a cellular data plan, and
    • other broadband subscriptions (cable, fiber, DSL, satellite), enabling identification of households that appear to rely on cellular-only internet service.
  • Limitations:
    • ACS does not measure signal strength, latency, or in-use speeds.
    • Small-area ACS estimates can carry substantial margins of error, affecting precision for a single county.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

  • Direct, county-specific device-type shares (smartphone vs basic phone vs tablet/hotspot) are not typically published in a standardized public dataset for Franklin County.
  • Practical proxy indicators:
    • The presence of a cellular data plan in ACS generally implies use of smartphones and/or dedicated mobile hotspots rather than voice-only devices, but ACS does not itemize device type.
    • National and state-level surveys (not county-specific) commonly indicate smartphones are the dominant device for mobile internet access, but applying those proportions to Franklin County would not be county-verified.
  • Documented limitations: Without a county-level device survey, statements about the exact mix of smartphones versus feature phones in Franklin County are not supported by a public, county-specific source.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity

Geography, land use, and infrastructure siting

  • Rural settlement patterns and lower population density typically reduce the economic incentive for dense tower grids, which affects:
    • indoor coverage consistency,
    • the presence of higher-capacity 5G layers, and
    • the speed at which network upgrades occur.
  • Topography and vegetation can influence propagation and shadowing, contributing to “pocket” areas with weaker service. Regional landforms and land cover can be reviewed via federal mapping resources such as the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).

Socioeconomic factors and subscription choices

  • Household income, age distribution, and housing characteristics influence whether households maintain both fixed broadband and mobile data, or rely on mobile-only service. These correlates can be examined using:
    • county demographic and housing tables at Census.gov,
    • broadband planning context and challenge statements in Alabama’s broadband program materials from ADECA.
  • Mobile-only reliance is often higher where fixed broadband options are limited or expensive, but county-specific quantification should be derived from ACS subscription tables rather than inferred.

County-level sources and how they support an evidence-based overview

  • Network availability (provider-reported): Use the FCC National Broadband Map to review 4G/5G availability by location and provider.
  • Household adoption and “cellular data plan” subscription: Use Census.gov (ACS internet subscription tables) for household-reported adoption indicators.
  • State planning context and mapped initiatives: Use Alabama broadband program resources from ADECA to understand statewide investment context that often correlates with rural coverage and adoption challenges.

Data limitations specific to Franklin County

  • Publicly accessible sources provide stronger county-level evidence for coverage availability (FCC reported coverage) and household internet subscription categories (ACS) than for mobile subscriber penetration rates and device-type distributions at the county level.
  • For Franklin County, definitive statements on:
    • exact smartphone share,
    • carrier market share,
    • precise mobile broadband adoption rates beyond ACS household subscription categories, require proprietary carrier data, specialized surveys, or local studies not consistently published in a standardized public format.

Social Media Trends

Franklin County is in northwest Alabama along the Mississippi border, with Russellville as the county seat and a largely rural settlement pattern shaped by small manufacturing, retail/service employment, and outdoor/recreation assets around the Bear Creek corridor. Lower population density and longer travel distances to services tend to increase the practical value of Facebook groups, local-news sharing, and messaging for community coordination compared with large-metro counties.

User statistics (penetration / residents active)

  • Local (county-level): Publicly comparable, county-specific social media penetration estimates are not consistently published by major survey organizations. Most reliable measures are available at the U.S. national and state/metro level rather than for individual rural counties.
  • National benchmarks used as best-available proxy for Franklin County:
    • About 69% of U.S. adults report using at least one social media site, per Pew Research Center’s Social Media Fact Sheet (latest rolling updates).
    • Social use is typically higher among younger adults and lower among older adults, which is relevant for rural counties with older age structures.

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

National survey patterns consistently show the highest use among younger adults, with strong adoption through midlife and lower rates among seniors:

  • 18–29: Highest overall social media use across major platforms (especially Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube).
  • 30–49: High use; Facebook and YouTube remain especially common, with moderate adoption of Instagram and TikTok.
  • 50–64: Majority use; Facebook and YouTube dominate.
  • 65+: Lowest use; Facebook and YouTube are the most common among users in this age group.
    Source basis: Pew Research Center platform-by-age tables.

Gender breakdown

Nationally, gender differences vary by platform more than by “any social media” use:

Most-used platforms (percentages where available)

Reliable platform shares are available as U.S. adult usage rates (not county-specific). The following are widely cited benchmarks:

  • YouTube: ~83% of U.S. adults
  • Facebook: ~68%
  • Instagram: ~47%
  • Pinterest: ~35%
  • TikTok: ~33%
  • LinkedIn: ~30%
  • X (Twitter): ~22%
  • Snapchat: ~27%
  • WhatsApp: ~29%
    Source: Pew Research Center’s Social Media Fact Sheet.
    Local interpretation for Franklin County: rural-community communication patterns commonly elevate the practical importance of Facebook (profiles + Groups) and Facebook Messenger for local announcements, buy/sell activity, school/sports updates, and community discussion, while YouTube functions as a cross-demographic entertainment and “how-to” channel.

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns / preferences)

  • Community information exchange: Rural counties typically show heavy reliance on Facebook Groups and local pages for real-time updates (events, road/weather impacts, school/sports, mutual aid). This aligns with Facebook’s broad reach among adults and strong presence in older cohorts (Pew platform-by-age data: tables and trendlines).
  • Video-first consumption: YouTube’s very high reach (Pew) supports frequent passive consumption (news clips, music, DIY, faith content) across ages; short-form video engagement is concentrated among younger adults on TikTok/Instagram Reels/Snapchat.
  • Messaging as a primary use case: Across the U.S., social platforms are frequently used for direct messaging and small-group coordination rather than public posting, particularly among adults in work-and-family stages; this maps well to dispersed communities where messaging substitutes for in-person coordination.
  • Local commerce and services discovery: In smaller markets, Facebook Marketplace and local groups commonly function as discovery channels for used goods, informal services, and community recommendations, reflecting Facebook’s broad adult penetration (Pew).
  • Platform segmentation by age: Younger residents concentrate attention on TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, while older residents more often center usage on Facebook and YouTube, creating a two-track pattern for local reach (Pew age breakdown: platform-by-age).

Family & Associates Records

Franklin County, Alabama maintains family and associate-related public records through county offices and the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH). Vital records—birth and death certificates—are recorded at the state level and issued by ADPH’s Center for Health Statistics; many applications are processed through local county health departments. Marriage records are filed with the Franklin County Probate Court; Alabama uses statewide marriage certificates (not marriage licenses) filed with probate courts. Divorce decrees are maintained by the Franklin County Circuit Clerk as part of court case files. Adoption records are generally sealed under Alabama law and are handled through the courts and state agencies, with limited release permitted by statute.

Public databases include recorded property and deed indexes and related filings maintained by the Probate Office, and court dockets/case information maintained by the Circuit Clerk; online availability varies by office and vendor arrangements. County contact points include the Franklin County Probate Office (marriage certificates, recording) and the Franklin County Circuit Clerk (court records). State-level vital records information is provided by ADPH Vital Records.

Access occurs in person at the relevant office during business hours; certified copies of vital records are requested through ADPH processes. Privacy restrictions commonly apply to recent birth and death records, juvenile matters, adoption files, and certain sensitive court filings; identification and fees are standard for certified copies.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

  • Marriage licenses (and related marriage records)

    • Marriage licenses are issued at the county level and form the basis of the county’s marriage record.
    • In Alabama, marriage creation is based on a marriage certificate form completed by the parties and recorded by the probate court; older records and formats may appear as license/return-style records depending on time period and local practice.

  • Divorce records (divorce decrees and case files)

    • Divorces are court actions. The final outcome is recorded as a final judgment/decree of divorce in the circuit court record.
    • Related documents (complaint, answer, settlement agreement, child support orders, custody orders, motions) may be part of the case file maintained by the circuit clerk.

  • Annulments

    • Annulments are also handled as court actions and are maintained in the circuit court in the same general manner as other domestic-relations cases, with an order/judgment and supporting filings.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

  • Marriage records

    • Filed/recorded: Franklin County Probate Court (county probate judge’s office).
    • Access: Certified copies are typically obtained through the probate office. Some statewide access for marriage certificates is also provided through the Alabama Center for Health Statistics (ADPH) (state vital records), depending on the record type and era.

  • Divorce and annulment records

    • Filed/recorded: Franklin County Circuit Court, maintained by the Circuit Clerk as part of the domestic-relations docket and case files.
    • Access: Copies of the final decree/judgment and other filings are typically requested from the circuit clerk. Alabama also maintains statewide divorce verification/indexing through ADPH Vital Records for eligible years and formats, which provides a state-level record useful for verification rather than the full case file.

  • Online/remote access

    • Availability of online images or docket detail varies by system and time period. Official certified copies are issued by the custodial office (probate for marriage recordings; circuit clerk for divorces/annulments; ADPH for state vital-record products).

Typical information included in these records

  • Marriage records (probate/vital record formats)

    • Full names of the parties
    • Date of marriage record filing/recording (and, where applicable, ceremony date and location)
    • Ages or dates of birth (varies by period/form)
    • Residences and/or counties of residence
    • Officiant information (where applicable) and recording details (book/page or instrument number)
    • Signatures/attestations and notarization elements for certificate-style filings

  • Divorce decrees / final judgments

    • Names of the parties and case number
    • Date of filing and date of final judgment
    • Court and county of jurisdiction
    • Disposition terms such as dissolution of marriage, restoration of a former name (when ordered), and references to incorporated agreements
    • Child-related provisions (custody, visitation, child support) and property/debt allocation may be summarized or incorporated by reference

  • Annulment judgments/orders

    • Names of the parties and case number
    • Date of order and legal basis reflected in the pleadings/order
    • Determinations regarding marital status and, where applicable, related orders affecting property or children

Privacy and legal restrictions

  • Public access vs. restricted information

    • Core marriage recordings and court judgments are generally treated as public records; however, access practices may limit copying of certain sensitive data.
    • Domestic-relations case files can contain sensitive information (e.g., minor children’s details, financial account numbers, medical information). Portions may be redacted or sealed by court order, and certain documents may be restricted from public inspection.

  • Certified copies and identity/eligibility rules

    • Vital-record products issued by ADPH (including marriage and divorce-related vital-record documents/verification) are governed by Alabama vital records statutes and administrative rules that restrict access to authorized requesters for certain record types and time periods.
    • Local custodians (probate and circuit clerk) issue certified copies under state law and court rules; certified copies are used for legal purposes and may require requester identification and applicable fees.

  • Sealing and confidentiality

    • Court-ordered sealing (common in cases involving minors, adoption-related matters, or sensitive allegations) restricts public access regardless of general public-record status.
    • Redaction requirements commonly apply to Social Security numbers and other personal identifiers in court filings and recorded instruments.

Education, Employment and Housing

Franklin County is in northwestern Alabama along the Mississippi state line, with its county seat in Russellville and the Shoals region (Florence–Muscle Shoals) to the east. The county is predominantly rural with small-city service centers, a relatively older age profile than fast-growing metro areas, and a housing stock dominated by single-family homes on larger lots.

Education Indicators

Public schools (counts and names)

Franklin County’s public K–12 education is primarily provided through two systems: Franklin County Schools and Russellville City Schools. School-by-school rosters change over time due to consolidations and grade reconfigurations; the most current official lists are maintained on district sites:

Public schools in the county typically include:

  • Elementary schools serving K–5 (or K–6 in some configurations)
  • Middle grades (often 6–8)
  • High schools (9–12), including a county high school and a city high school in Russellville

Note on counts and names: A precise “number of public schools” and the complete school name list is best taken directly from the district directories above because state and federal datasets often lag boundary and campus changes by 1–2 reporting cycles.

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratios: Countywide ratios are commonly reported via federal school/district profiles and state report cards. The most accessible sources for district-level ratios in Alabama are the district profiles available through the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) and Alabama’s state reporting.
  • Graduation rates: Alabama reports high school graduation using cohort rates (ACGR) at the school and district levels through state reporting. District and school graduation rate values for Franklin County’s systems are published in Alabama’s education reporting tools.

Proxy note: Without pulling the latest campus-level report card tables directly into this page, the definitive source for the most recent student–teacher ratios and ACGR values is the NCES profiles (ratios) and Alabama’s state report cards (graduation rates) for Franklin County Schools and Russellville City Schools.

Adult education levels (high school; bachelor’s and higher)

Adult educational attainment is tracked most consistently through the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) (population age 25+). The most recent ACS 5-year estimates provide:

  • Share with high school diploma or higher
  • Share with bachelor’s degree or higher

Official county profile tables:

County context (ACS pattern for rural NW Alabama): Franklin County typically reports a high school-or-higher share in line with rural Alabama counties and a bachelor’s-or-higher share below Alabama’s statewide average, reflecting the county’s rural labor market mix and commuting ties to nearby employment centers.

Notable programs (STEM, vocational, AP/dual enrollment)

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE): Alabama districts commonly offer CTE pathways aligned to regional manufacturing, construction, health science, transportation, and business support occupations. Program availability is published in district course guides and CTE pages (district sources linked above).
  • Advanced coursework: High schools in Alabama typically offer Advanced Placement (AP) and/or dual enrollment through local postsecondary partners; availability varies by campus and staffing. District academic guides and high school counseling pages provide definitive lists (district sources linked above).
  • Regional postsecondary training: For workforce development and technical training, Franklin County residents often use nearby community/technical college options in the broader region; program catalogs and adult workforce training offerings are posted by the relevant institutions.

School safety measures and counseling resources

  • Safety measures: Alabama public schools commonly employ a mix of controlled entry procedures, visitor management, campus SRO/police coordination (varying by jurisdiction), emergency drills, and behavioral threat assessment processes. District student handbooks and board policies provide the definitive description of local measures (district sources linked above).
  • Counseling resources: K–12 schools in Alabama generally provide school counseling services (academic planning, behavioral supports, crisis response coordination). Many districts also coordinate with community mental health providers for referrals and in-school services where available; details are published on school counseling pages and student support services sections of district websites.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year available)

Franklin County’s official unemployment statistics are published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (LAUS) and disseminated through the Alabama Department of Workforce. The most recent annual and monthly rates are available here:

Proxy note: County unemployment in northwestern Alabama typically tracks broader non-metro Alabama patterns, with noticeable sensitivity to manufacturing cycles and seasonal shifts in construction and services.

Major industries and employment sectors

Industry composition for Franklin County is most reliably measured via the ACS (industry by occupation) and the Census “County Business Patterns” (establishments by sector). Common major sectors for the county and surrounding region include:

  • Manufacturing (often a leading source of stable, full-time employment in the region)
  • Health care and social assistance
  • Retail trade
  • Educational services (including public K–12 employment)
  • Construction
  • Transportation and warehousing (regionally connected to freight corridors)
  • Public administration

Primary sources:

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

Occupational categories most often represented in rural counties of this type include:

  • Production, transportation, and material moving
  • Office and administrative support
  • Sales and related
  • Education, training, and library (including school employment)
  • Health care support and practitioners
  • Construction and extraction
  • Management and business operations (smaller share than metro areas)

Definitive occupational distributions are published in ACS occupation tables:

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

Commuting metrics are available through the ACS, including:

  • Mean travel time to work
  • Mode share (drive alone, carpool, work from home, etc.)

Typical rural patterns include high private vehicle dependence and limited transit availability, with commuting flows to nearby job centers outside the county for manufacturing, health care, and services.

Source:

Local employment versus out-of-county work

The county’s labor market includes both:

  • Residents working locally (schools, health services, retail, local government, small manufacturing)
  • Out-of-county commuters to larger employment bases in adjacent counties and the Shoals area

The most definitive measure of inflow/outflow and “where workers live vs. where they work” is the Census LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics:

Proxy note: In rural Alabama counties near larger employment nodes, it is common for a substantial share of employed residents to work outside the home county, particularly for higher-wage manufacturing, medical, and administrative roles.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership rate and rental share

Homeownership and rental shares are published in the ACS housing tenure tables:

County context (ACS pattern for rural counties): Franklin County typically shows a higher homeownership rate and a lower rental share than large Alabama metros, reflecting the prevalence of single-family housing and manufactured homes.

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units is reported in the ACS (5-year estimates), including distribution by value bands.
  • Recent trends in rural north Alabama generally reflect moderate appreciation since 2020, with variability by proximity to Russellville and highway corridors and by the condition/age of the housing stock.

Source:

Proxy note: For “recent trends” at higher frequency than ACS, commonly used proxies include Zillow/Redfin indices; these are not official and should be treated as market estimates rather than definitive statistics.

Typical rent prices

The ACS reports median gross rent and rent distribution:

County context: Rents are typically below Alabama metro averages, with a smaller apartment inventory and more single-family rentals and manufactured-home rentals than urban counties.

Types of housing

Housing stock in Franklin County is characterized by:

  • Single-family detached homes as the dominant type
  • Manufactured homes present at meaningful shares in rural areas
  • Small multifamily properties and limited apartment complexes, concentrated near Russellville and other service nodes
  • Rural lots and acreage tracts, including agricultural-adjacent properties and scattered residential development along county roads

The ACS housing structure type table is the standard reference:

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools or amenities)

  • Russellville functions as the primary hub for schools, health services, groceries, and civic amenities, resulting in more neighborhood-style subdivisions and shorter drives to services.
  • Outlying communities typically have larger lots, lower density, and longer travel times to full-service retail and health care, with schools serving as important community anchors.

Proxy note: Detailed, standardized neighborhood amenity indices are not uniformly available for rural counties; proximity patterns are most reliably described using municipal boundaries, school attendance zones (district sources), and drive-time mapping.

Property tax overview (average rate and typical homeowner cost)

Alabama property taxes are assessed at the county level under state rules, with effective tax burdens generally low relative to national averages. Definitive local rates and typical bills depend on:

  • assessed value
  • classification (owner-occupied vs. other)
  • applicable millage (county, city, school, and special districts)

Authoritative references:

Proxy note: Without parcel-level aggregation, “typical homeowner cost” is best represented by ACS median annual owner costs (with and without a mortgage), which provides a standardized, countywide measure of housing cost burden rather than a tax-only figure:

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Alabama