Pepin County is a small, largely rural county in western Wisconsin, situated along the Mississippi River near the Minnesota border. It lies in the state’s Driftless Area, a region that escaped the last glaciation and is characterized by steep bluffs, wooded coulees, and river valleys. Created in 1858 from portions of Buffalo and Wabasha counties, Pepin County developed around river transportation and agriculture, with communities historically tied to the Mississippi’s trading and milling economy. Today the county’s population is under 8,000, making it one of Wisconsin’s least populous counties. Land use is dominated by farming and forests, with additional employment linked to small-scale manufacturing, services, and tourism associated with the river corridor. The landscape includes Lake Pepin, an open-water widening of the Mississippi that influences local recreation and ecology. The county seat is the City of Pepin.

Pepin County Local Demographic Profile

Pepin County is a small, predominantly rural county in west-central Wisconsin along the Mississippi River. The county seat is Durand, and the county is part of the Eau Claire–Menomonie region of the state.

Population Size

Age & Gender

County-level age distribution and sex composition are provided in standardized tables from the U.S. Census Bureau.

  • Age distribution: Reported by the Census Bureau via data.census.gov (ACS profile and detailed tables for Pepin County).
  • Gender ratio / sex composition: Reported by the Census Bureau via data.census.gov (ACS profile and detailed tables for Pepin County).

Exact figures for the requested age brackets and gender ratio are not provided on the QuickFacts page itself; they are available in the county’s ACS profile tables on data.census.gov.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

  • The county’s racial and Hispanic/Latino composition are reported by the U.S. Census Bureau on QuickFacts for Pepin County (race categories and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity).
  • Additional detail (including multi-race detail and specific race groups) is available through data.census.gov for Pepin County (Decennial Census and ACS tables).

Household & Housing Data

Household and housing measures are reported through U.S. Census Bureau county profiles and tables.

  • Households, persons per household, and family/household characteristics: Available via data.census.gov (ACS profile/detailed tables for Pepin County).
  • Housing units, occupancy/vacancy, and owner/renter characteristics: Available via data.census.gov and summarized in parts on QuickFacts.

Local Government Reference

For local government and planning resources, visit the Pepin County official website.

Email Usage

Pepin County’s small population and rural Mississippi River–bluff geography contribute to lower population density and fewer last‑mile infrastructure options, shaping how residents access digital communication. Direct county‑level email usage statistics are not routinely published; broadband and device access serve as proxies for likely email adoption.

Digital access indicators (proxies for email use)

The U.S. Census Bureau (ACS) “Computer and Internet Use” tables provide county estimates for household broadband subscriptions and computer ownership. These indicators track the practical ability to maintain email accounts and use webmail or apps. County context and service availability are also reflected in FCC National Broadband Map coverage and provider reporting.

Age and gender distribution

ACS demographic profiles on data.census.gov summarize Pepin County’s age structure; older age distributions are typically associated with lower adoption of new digital services, including email, relative to prime working‑age populations. Gender distribution is usually near parity and is not a primary driver compared with age and connectivity.

Connectivity and infrastructure limitations

Rural build‑out costs, terrain, and distance from network backbones can limit speeds, redundancy, and provider choice, influencing reliance on mobile connectivity and shared/public access points rather than always‑on home broadband.

Mobile Phone Usage

Pepin County is a small, predominantly rural county in western Wisconsin along the Mississippi River, with the county seat in Durand. Its settlement pattern is characterized by small municipalities separated by agricultural land and river/bluff terrain. Low population density and topographic variation along the river valley and adjacent uplands are common factors that shape mobile coverage quality (especially indoors and in valleys) and the economics of network expansion.

Data scope and key limitations

County-specific statistics for “mobile penetration” (for example, the share of residents with a mobile phone subscription) are not consistently published at the county level in a single authoritative dataset. As a result, county discussion typically relies on (1) household technology access and internet subscription indicators from federal surveys and (2) network availability datasets from the FCC. Network availability describes where service is reported as available; it does not measure whether households subscribe or the quality experienced at a specific address.

Mobile penetration or access indicators (adoption proxies)

Household access to telephone and internet service (adoption)

  • The most widely used public indicators for local adoption come from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS), which reports household access to internet subscriptions and computing devices, and (in some tables) telephone service status. These measures are household-based adoption proxies rather than carrier subscription counts. County-level tables can be accessed via the Census Bureau’s data platforms such as Census.gov data tables.
  • The ACS “Computer and Internet Use” subject tables provide county estimates for:
    • Households with an internet subscription (which includes cellular data plans when reported as the household’s internet service)
    • Households with smartphone and other device types (desktop/laptop/tablet)
    • Households with broadband such as cable/fiber/DSL and cellular data plans
      These figures represent household adoption and can differ from individual-level phone ownership.

Broadband adoption dashboards and state summaries

  • Wisconsin broadband programs and state summaries sometimes compile adoption and availability indicators using federal data sources. The most relevant official entry point is the Wisconsin Public Service Commission broadband program pages, which reference statewide and local broadband planning resources. Pepin County-specific “mobile penetration” rates are not consistently presented as an official county metric, so ACS remains the primary public source for household adoption proxies.

Network availability (4G/5G) versus household adoption (clear distinction)

Network availability (supply-side)

  • The principal public dataset for mobile network availability in the U.S. is the FCC’s Broadband Data Collection (BDC). It provides provider-reported coverage for mobile broadband by technology generation and can be viewed through the FCC National Broadband Map.
  • The FCC map supports viewing:
    • 4G LTE and 5G coverage extents by provider
    • Location-based broadband availability in the fixed broadband context, and coverage polygons/availability for mobile broadband
      Availability on the FCC map indicates reported service presence, not guaranteed signal strength everywhere within a coverage area.

Household adoption (demand-side)

  • Household adoption metrics describe whether households subscribe to internet service or report having smartphones/devices. These are best obtained via ACS tables on Census.gov.
  • Adoption can lag availability in rural areas because of price sensitivity, device replacement cycles, and the presence of alternative connectivity options (for example, fixed wireless or wired service in some communities). These relationships are commonly assessed at the county level using ACS adoption indicators alongside FCC availability layers, but they remain distinct measures.

Mobile internet usage patterns (4G/5G availability and typical rural performance considerations)

4G LTE and 5G availability

  • Pepin County’s 4G LTE availability is best assessed using the provider layers in the FCC National Broadband Map. Rural counties in western Wisconsin commonly show broad 4G LTE presence along highways and populated corridors, with localized gaps related to terrain and tower spacing. County-specific gaps should be identified directly from the FCC map rather than generalized.
  • 5G availability in rural counties is often more limited and clustered near population centers and major travel corridors, with variations by provider and spectrum band. The FCC map provides the authoritative public view for reported 5G coverage by provider in Pepin County.

Usage patterns: mobile as primary vs supplemental internet (county-level evidence limits)

  • County-level “usage patterns” such as the share of residents relying primarily on cellular data for home internet are not measured directly as behavioral telemetry in public datasets. The ACS does provide a household-level indicator for internet subscription types (including “cellular data plan”), which is commonly used as a proxy for reliance on mobile internet at home. Those estimates can be retrieved for Pepin County using ACS internet subscription tables.
  • Mobile performance and user experience can vary significantly within rural river/bluff terrain: signal can be weaker in valleys or behind ridgelines; indoor coverage can differ from outdoor coverage; and network capacity can fluctuate in small towns during events. These are well-established physical and network-engineering factors, but publicly available county-level performance measurements are limited compared with availability reporting.

Common device types (smartphones vs other devices)

  • The ACS includes county-level estimates for household device availability, including smartphones, tablets, and traditional computers. These data allow an evidence-based comparison of smartphone presence versus other device categories, but they are measured at the household level (for example, “has a smartphone”) rather than “number of smartphones.” Pepin County figures can be pulled from ACS Computer and Internet Use tables on Census.gov.
  • Public county-level breakdowns of device models (iOS vs Android, handset types) are generally not available from government statistical releases. Such detail is typically held by private analytics firms and carriers.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity

Geography, terrain, and land use

  • Pepin County’s rural character and the Mississippi River corridor contribute to coverage variability. River valleys and bluff terrain can obstruct line-of-sight propagation from macrocell towers, leading to uneven signal levels over short distances. Agricultural land and forested areas with fewer tall structures reduce opportunities for dense cell site placement.
  • Lower population density increases the cost per subscriber of building additional towers or small cells, which influences the pace and density of network upgrades.

Settlement pattern and transportation corridors

  • Coverage is often strongest near incorporated places and along state and federal highways where demand and travel safety needs are higher. In sparsely populated township areas, availability can be more variable and may depend on tower placement in neighboring counties or along ridge lines.

Age, income, and household composition (adoption-side indicators)

  • Demographic factors affecting smartphone and mobile internet adoption are typically evaluated using ACS characteristics (age distribution, income, education) in combination with ACS technology adoption tables at the county level. These relationships can be analyzed using Pepin County ACS profiles available via Census.gov, but county-level causation cannot be established from ACS summaries alone.
  • Rural counties often show wider variation in home broadband subscription types (wired, fixed wireless, cellular) across households, and technology choice can be linked to housing dispersion and the availability of fixed networks. The clearest public evidence for Pepin County remains ACS subscription-type estimates paired with FCC availability layers.

Practical sources for Pepin County-specific verification

Social Media Trends

Pepin County is a small, rural county in western Wisconsin along the Mississippi River, anchored by communities such as Pepin, Durand, and Stockholm. Its economy and culture reflect a mix of agriculture, river/tourism activity, and commuting links to larger labor markets in the Eau Claire–Menomonie region. Lower population density and an older age profile than many metro areas tend to correspond with slightly lower adoption of newer platforms and heavier reliance on widely established networks and messaging.

User statistics (penetration and active use)

  • County-specific social media penetration: Not published in a standardized, regularly updated form for Pepin County; most high-quality measures are available at the U.S. or state level rather than by small counties.
  • U.S. adult benchmark: About 69% of U.S. adults use at least one social media site (Pew Research Center). Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
  • Local interpretation: Pepin County’s usage is generally expected to track rural/older-population patterns documented in national surveys, where adoption is broad but platform mix skews toward Facebook and messaging rather than trend-driven apps.

Age group trends (highest-using groups)

National survey patterns consistently show highest use among younger adults, with usage declining by age:

  • 18–29: highest overall social media usage
  • 30–49: high usage, typically slightly below 18–29
  • 50–64: majority usage, but lower than under-50 groups
  • 65+: lowest usage, with sizable minorities still active (especially on Facebook) Source: Pew Research Center social media use by age.

Gender breakdown

Across major platforms, gender differences are generally platform-specific rather than a large overall gap:

  • Women tend to over-index on visually oriented and community-focused platforms such as Pinterest and often Instagram.
  • Men tend to over-index on discussion- and news-adjacent platforms such as X (formerly Twitter) and Reddit. Source: Pew Research Center platform use by gender.

Most-used platforms (percentages where available)

The most consistently used platforms among U.S. adults (benchmarks commonly applied when county-level measures are unavailable) include:

  • YouTube: widely used across age groups
  • Facebook: broad reach, especially strong among adults 30+ and 50+
  • Instagram: strongest among younger adults
  • Pinterest: higher among women
  • TikTok: concentrated among younger adults
  • LinkedIn: concentrated among college-educated and higher-income workers
    Platform-by-platform percentages and demographic splits are tracked here: Pew Research Center: Social media and technology.

Behavioral trends (engagement and preferences)

  • Community information and local events: In rural counties, social platforms are frequently used for community announcements, school and sports updates, local business discovery, and event coordination, aligning with Facebook’s strength in groups and local networks (documented nationally in platform feature use and audience composition). Source: Pew Research Center social media usage context.
  • Age-driven content consumption: Younger adults show higher engagement with short-form video and creator-led content (notably TikTok and Instagram), while older adults more often use social media for keeping up with family/friends and community updates (commonly reflected in Facebook usage patterns). Source: Pew Research Center demographic patterns by platform.
  • Messaging and “lightweight” interaction: Engagement commonly includes reactions, shares, and messaging rather than public posting, a pattern observed in broad U.S. research on how people interact on major platforms. Source: Pew Research Center Internet & Technology research.

Family & Associates Records

Pepin County, Wisconsin maintains vital (family) records such as births, deaths, and marriages, generally through the local vital records office and in coordination with the Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS). Records of divorce are maintained by the court system, and adoption records are typically subject to more restrictive access controls than standard vital records.

Public-facing databases for family records are limited. Wisconsin’s statewide resources include the Wisconsin DHS Vital Records information pages and ordering pathways, rather than a comprehensive public index for all certificate data. For court-related public records (often relevant for family and associate research, such as divorces, civil cases, and some probate matters), Wisconsin provides the Wisconsin Circuit Court Access (WCCA) portal.

In-person access to county-held records and services is typically provided through the county offices listed on the Pepin County official website. Court records are handled by the Pepin County Circuit Court directory and clerk’s office functions.

Privacy and access restrictions apply to many vital records in Wisconsin, including time-based limits and eligibility requirements for certified copies. Adoption and certain family-related court matters may be sealed or partially redacted.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

Marriage records

  • Marriage licenses: Issued at the county level prior to a marriage and used to authorize the ceremony.
  • Marriage certificates/returns: The completed record returned by the officiant after the ceremony; this becomes the official county record of the marriage.
  • Certified and uncertified copies: Wisconsin counties typically provide certified copies (for legal purposes) and may provide uncertified/informational copies depending on requester eligibility.

Divorce records

  • Divorce case files: Court records created in a civil action that may include the summons/petition, affidavits, findings of fact, and other filings.
  • Judgment of divorce (divorce decree): The final court order ending the marriage and setting terms (for example, legal custody/placement, child support, property division, maintenance).

Annulment records

  • Annulment case files: Court records in an action to declare a marriage void or voidable.
  • Judgment of annulment: The final court order determining the legal status of the marriage (often referred to as an annulment decree or judgment).

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

Marriage records (Pepin County)

  • Filed/maintained by: Pepin County Register of Deeds (county-level vital records office for marriages).
  • Access methods:
    • In person or by request through the Pepin County Register of Deeds for copies of marriage records maintained by the county.
    • State-level copies are also maintained by the Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS), Vital Records Office, which can issue certified copies of Wisconsin marriage records.
      Link: Wisconsin DHS Vital Records

Divorce and annulment records (Pepin County)

  • Filed/maintained by: Pepin County Clerk of Circuit Court (custodian of the circuit court case record for divorces and annulments).
  • Access methods:
    • Case access and docket information are generally available through Wisconsin Circuit Court Access (WCCA/CCAP) for many cases, with sensitive information excluded by rule.
      Link: Wisconsin Circuit Court Access
    • Copies of judgments and documents are obtained from the Pepin County Clerk of Circuit Court, typically by in-person request, mail, or other clerk-approved request processes, subject to access restrictions and copying fees.

Typical information included in these records

Marriage license/certificate records

Common data elements include:

  • Full legal names of the spouses (including prior names where recorded)
  • Date and place of marriage
  • Date the license was issued
  • Officiant name/title and officiant certification/statement
  • Witness information (where recorded)
  • Ages or dates of birth (varies by record format and time period)
  • Residence information and, in some formats, parents’ names or birthplaces (varies by time period and form)

Divorce decrees (judgments of divorce) and case files

Common data elements include:

  • Names of parties and case number
  • Date the action was filed and date judgment was entered
  • Court findings and orders on:
    • Legal custody and physical placement (when minor children are involved)
    • Child support and related financial orders
    • Property division and allocation of debts
    • Spousal maintenance (alimony), when ordered
    • Restoration of a former name, when granted
  • Case files may also include financial disclosures and other supporting documents, which may be restricted from public inspection.

Annulment judgments and case files

Common data elements include:

  • Names of parties and case number
  • Basis for annulment as pled and found by the court (as stated in pleadings/orders)
  • Date judgment was entered
  • Orders addressing children, support, and property issues where applicable
  • Associated filings may contain sensitive personal and financial information and may be restricted.

Privacy or legal restrictions

Marriage records

  • Wisconsin vital records access is governed by state law and administrative rules. Certified copies of marriage records are generally limited to persons with a direct and tangible interest and others authorized by law; requesters typically must provide acceptable identification and pay statutory fees.
  • Genealogical/historical access may be available for older records under Wisconsin vital records rules and record-retention practices, with access varying by record age and format.

Divorce and annulment records

  • Divorce and annulment are court records. Many case events and certain documents are accessible as public records, but confidential information is protected by Wisconsin statutes and court rules.
  • Courts restrict or redact categories of sensitive information, including (commonly) Social Security numbers, financial account numbers, and certain information involving minors.
  • Some documents or entire cases may be sealed or otherwise excluded from public access by statute or court order (for example, specific confidential filings, protected records involving children, or sealed exhibits).
  • Online case access systems provide limited views and omit restricted information; certified copies or complete file access is managed through the Clerk of Circuit Court subject to applicable restrictions.

Education, Employment and Housing

Pepin County is a small, rural county in western Wisconsin along the Mississippi River, between the Eau Claire–Chippewa Falls region and La Crosse. The county seat is Durand, and the county includes small cities and villages (notably Durand and Pepin) plus extensive agricultural and wooded areas. Population size and density are low by state standards, and many residents commute to jobs in nearby counties along the Highway 10/35 corridors.

Education Indicators

Public schools (count and names)

Pepin County’s K–12 public education is primarily served by two school districts, each operating a PK–12 campus-style set of schools:

  • Durand-Arkansaw School District (Durand)
    Public schools commonly listed include:
    • Durand Elementary School
    • Durand Junior/Senior High School
  • Pepin Area School District (Pepin)
    Public schools commonly listed include:
    • Pepin Elementary School
    • Pepin Middle/High School

School naming and grade configurations are based on district/campus structures as reported by district and statewide school directories; Pepin County has a small number of public schools relative to urban counties. For official listings and current enrollment/school details, see the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (DPI) school and district information resources.

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratios: In rural Wisconsin districts, ratios commonly fall in the mid-teens (approximately 12–16 students per teacher) depending on grade level and year. District-specific ratios vary by staffing and enrollment and are best verified through the Wisconsin DPI district report cards and staffing summaries.
  • Graduation rates: Pepin County districts generally report high graduation rates by state standards, with year-to-year variation typical of small cohorts. District-level “4-year” and “7-year” graduation rates are published on Wisconsin district report cards via Wisconsin DPI Report Cards.

(Countywide averages are less commonly published than district report-card metrics; district report cards are the most direct and recent source for these indicators.)

Adult educational attainment (adults 25+)

Pepin County’s adult educational attainment is typically characterized by:

  • A high share with at least a high school diploma (commonly around 90% in comparable rural Wisconsin counties).
  • A smaller share with a bachelor’s degree or higher than statewide averages (often in the 20–30% range in similar rural counties).

The most consistent “most recent” source for these measures is the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS). County profiles are available through data.census.gov (search: “Pepin County, Wisconsin educational attainment”).

Notable programs (STEM, vocational training, AP/dual credit)

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE)/vocational coursework is a common emphasis in small rural districts, typically including agriculture, trades/technology, business, and applied sciences.
  • Dual credit (e.g., transcripted credit) and AP course access may be offered with smaller menus than large districts, sometimes supplemented by shared services or online options.

Program availability changes over time and is best confirmed through district course catalogs and state report-card “college and career readiness” indicators via Wisconsin DPI Report Cards.

School safety measures and counseling resources

Across Wisconsin public districts, baseline safety and student-support practices generally include:

  • Controlled building access during the school day, visitor sign-in procedures, and emergency response drills (fire, severe weather, lockdown).
  • Student services that commonly include school counseling, special education services, and coordination with county/community mental health resources.

Specific staffing levels (counselor-to-student ratios) and detailed safety plans are typically maintained at the district level rather than summarized in countywide datasets.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year available)

The most frequently cited “official” annual county unemployment rates come from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (LAUS) and state labor-market summaries. Pepin County’s unemployment is generally low and seasonally influenced, consistent with rural counties that include manufacturing, services, and agriculture, with year-to-year variation.

For the most recent annual figure and trend line, the authoritative sources are:

Major industries and employment sectors

Pepin County’s economy is typically structured around:

  • Manufacturing (often a key private-sector employer in western Wisconsin counties)
  • Health care and social assistance
  • Retail trade and accommodation/food services (local-serving employment plus Mississippi River tourism influence)
  • Construction
  • Agriculture and related services (direct farm employment is often undercounted in some datasets due to proprietors/self-employment and seasonal patterns)
  • Public administration and education (schools, county/local government)

Industry composition and job counts are available in county industry tables via Wisconsin DWD LMI.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

Typical occupational concentrations in Pepin County align with rural regional norms:

  • Production and transportation/material moving
  • Office/administrative support
  • Sales and related
  • Management
  • Food preparation and serving
  • Construction and extraction
  • Healthcare practitioners/support
  • Education/training/library (smaller absolute counts, steady presence)

Occupational employment estimates are generally provided at multi-county or workforce development area levels; county-level detail can be limited in sparsely populated counties. State LMI profiles remain the most consistent proxy source (Wisconsin DWD LMI).

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

  • Commuting patterns: A substantial share of employed residents commute out of Pepin County to larger employment centers in neighboring counties (e.g., Eau Claire area, Buffalo/Pierce counties, and other western Wisconsin markets).
  • Mean travel time to work: Rural western Wisconsin counties commonly show mean commute times around 20–30 minutes, reflecting longer distances and limited transit.

The standard source for mean commute time and commuting flows is the ACS commuting tables on data.census.gov. The U.S. Census also provides commuting flow context through tools such as OnTheMap (LEHD).

Local employment vs. out-of-county work

Pepin County typically functions as a net exporter of labor (more residents commuting out than nonresidents commuting in), given limited local job density and proximity to larger regional employers. The most direct measurement uses LEHD residence-area vs. workplace-area counts via OnTheMap.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership rate and rental share

Pepin County’s housing profile is predominantly owner-occupied, consistent with rural Wisconsin:

  • Homeownership commonly around 70–80%
  • Renters commonly around 20–30%

The most recent, standardized estimates are reported by the ACS at data.census.gov (search: “Pepin County, Wisconsin tenure”).

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median home value: Typically below the Wisconsin statewide median, reflecting rural market pricing, with variation driven by river-adjacent properties and proximity to regional job centers.
  • Recent trends: Like most of Wisconsin, Pepin County has generally experienced appreciation since 2020, moderated by inventory constraints and higher interest rates. Precise median value and multi-year change are best taken from ACS “median value (owner-occupied)” and local market reports.

County-level ACS median home value is available via data.census.gov. Market-based measures (sale prices) are often available through regional MLS summaries (not uniformly public at county resolution).

Typical rent prices

  • Median gross rent in Pepin County is typically lower than metro Wisconsin counties, reflecting smaller-unit supply and lower cost structures, though limited rental inventory can push rents upward in specific towns.

The most consistent, comparable metric is ACS median gross rent on data.census.gov.

Types of housing

Pepin County’s housing stock is dominated by:

  • Single-family detached homes and farmhouses/rural residences
  • Manufactured homes in some rural tracts
  • Small multifamily buildings (limited apartment supply) concentrated in Durand, Pepin, and village centers
  • Rural lots/acreage properties, including wooded parcels and Mississippi River bluff/valley settings

New development is generally limited and often consists of infill, replacement housing, or small-lot subdivisions near towns rather than large-scale tract development.

Neighborhood characteristics (access to schools and amenities)

  • Durand (county seat): Most concentrated access to schools, grocery/retail, clinics, and civic services; housing includes older single-family neighborhoods and small multifamily properties near the city center and school campuses.
  • Pepin and river-adjacent areas: Mix of village housing and scattered rural homes; proximity to Mississippi River amenities influences some property demand and seasonal-use patterns.
  • Unincorporated/rural areas: Larger lots, longer travel times to schools and services, and greater reliance on personal vehicles.

Property tax overview (rate and typical homeowner cost)

Wisconsin property taxes vary substantially by municipality, school district, and assessed value. Pepin County homeowners generally pay:

  • Effective property tax rates in a typical Wisconsin rural range (often around 1.5%–2.5% of assessed value, varying by locality and year).
  • Typical annual tax bills that depend strongly on assessed value and local levy; countywide “typical” costs are best represented by median property tax or median real estate tax estimates in ACS tables.

For the most consistent county-level comparisons, use ACS “real estate taxes” tables on data.census.gov. For levy and rate components by jurisdiction, see local tax rate publications and summaries from the Wisconsin Department of Revenue and municipal clerks/treasurers (jurisdiction-specific rates are not uniform countywide).

Data note (availability and proxies): Several requested indicators (countywide student–teacher ratios, countywide graduation rates, and granular occupation splits) are most reliably published at the district, region, or multi-county level rather than as a single Pepin County statistic. The most recent, definitive values for education outcomes are provided through district report cards (Wisconsin DPI), while commuting time, educational attainment, tenure, home value, and rent are most consistently measured through the U.S. Census Bureau ACS.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Wisconsin