Marquette County is located in central Wisconsin, east of the Wisconsin River and generally between the Stevens Point–Wisconsin Rapids area and the Fox Valley. Established in 1836 and organized in 1848, the county developed around agriculture, small communities, and travel routes linking central Wisconsin. It is small in population, with roughly 15,000 residents, and retains a predominantly rural character.

The landscape features a mix of farmland, forests, and abundant lakes and wetlands typical of Wisconsin’s Central Sands region, supporting outdoor recreation and seasonal lake-area settlement. The local economy is anchored by agriculture, public-sector employment, and tourism tied to natural resources. Communities are dispersed, with small towns and unincorporated areas forming much of the settlement pattern. Cultural life reflects central Wisconsin traditions, including outdoor pursuits and local civic organizations. The county seat is Montello.

Marquette County Local Demographic Profile

Marquette County is a rural county in central Wisconsin, generally aligned with the state’s Central Sands region and anchored by communities such as Montello and Westfield. County services and planning information are published by the Marquette County official website.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Marquette County, Wisconsin, the county’s population size is reported in the “Population estimates” section (latest available annual estimate) and the “Population, Census” line (decennial count).

Age & Gender

Age distribution and gender ratio (including the share of residents under 18, 18–64, and 65+, as well as the percentage female/male) are provided in the demographic characteristics tables on the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts page for Marquette County. These figures come from U.S. Census Bureau programs (decennial census and American Community Survey) as presented on QuickFacts.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

Racial composition (e.g., White, Black or African American, American Indian and Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, Two or More Races) and ethnicity (Hispanic or Latino) are reported on the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Marquette County under the race and Hispanic origin measures.

Household & Housing Data

Household and housing indicators—including total households, average household size, owner-occupied vs. renter-occupied housing, median value of owner-occupied housing units, median gross rent, and total housing units—are compiled on the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Marquette County in the “Housing” and “Families & Living Arrangements” sections.

Email Usage

Marquette County, Wisconsin is a largely rural county with low population density, so long cable runs, fewer providers, and gaps in cellular coverage can constrain everyday digital communication such as email.

Direct county-level email-usage statistics are not typically published; broadband subscription, device access, and age structure serve as proxies for likely email adoption. The U.S. Census Bureau (data.census.gov) provides American Community Survey indicators for the county on household computer ownership and broadband subscriptions, which are commonly used to gauge practical access to email (at home or via mobile tethering). Age distribution from the same source helps interpret adoption: older-skewing rural populations generally have lower rates of daily online activity and account creation than prime working-age groups, affecting email use for services, healthcare portals, and government communication. Gender distribution is available from ACS tables but is not a primary determinant of email adoption compared with age and connectivity access.

Infrastructure limitations are reflected in federal broadband-availability mapping and provider reporting; the FCC National Broadband Map and Wisconsin PSC broadband resources document service footprints and remaining coverage gaps that can limit reliable email access, especially outside population centers.

Mobile Phone Usage

Marquette County is a small, largely rural county in central Wisconsin, with a landscape shaped by glacial terrain, extensive agricultural areas, and numerous lakes and wetlands (including areas around the Fox River and associated watersheds). The county seat is Montello, and population density is low compared with Wisconsin’s metropolitan counties. Rural settlement patterns, forested or wetland terrain, and long distances between towers and fiber backhaul routes are factors that commonly affect mobile signal propagation and the economics of network buildout.

Key distinction: availability vs. adoption

  • Network availability refers to where mobile carriers report service (coverage footprints and advertised technologies such as LTE or 5G).
  • Adoption (household use) refers to whether residents subscribe to mobile service, rely on mobile for internet access, and what devices they use.

County-level adoption metrics are commonly available through Census survey tables (with margins of error), while technology-specific mobile coverage is typically available through the FCC’s reported coverage datasets.

Mobile access and penetration indicators (adoption)

Household telephone and internet access (Census-based)

County-level indicators for mobile access and mobile-only reliance are most consistently sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS), which measures:

  • Households with a telephone service and, in some tables, cellular-only vs. landline presence (availability varies by ACS release and table structure).
  • Types of internet subscriptions, including cellular data plan as an internet access type, and whether households have any internet subscription.

These data are published with sampling error, and smaller counties can show higher margins of error. The most direct way to retrieve Marquette County estimates is through the Census Bureau table explorer:

Limitations at county level:

  • ACS does not measure signal quality or speed; it measures reported subscription types.
  • “Cellular data plan” in ACS reflects household-reported internet subscription, not whether cellular is the primary connection for all members or whether it performs reliably at the location.

Mobile internet usage patterns and network technology (availability)

4G LTE availability

In rural Wisconsin counties, 4G LTE is generally the baseline mobile broadband layer, with coverage typically extending further than mid-band 5G due to propagation characteristics and tower spacing. The authoritative national source for carrier-reported coverage is the FCC’s Broadband Data Collection (BDC), which includes mobile broadband coverage by provider and technology.

Primary sources:

Important limitation:

  • FCC mobile coverage is provider-reported modeled coverage and can overstate real-world service in areas with vegetation, terrain obstructions, indoor attenuation, and limited backhaul. It describes where service is claimed to be available, not measured performance at every point.

5G availability

5G availability in rural counties is typically uneven and may include:

  • Low-band 5G (broader coverage, often closer to LTE-like range and speeds in many deployments).
  • Mid-band 5G (higher capacity, shorter range; more likely concentrated in towns and along major travel corridors).
  • High-band/mmWave 5G (very limited range; generally concentrated in dense urban zones and specific venues; typically minimal in rural counties).

Technology-specific availability for Marquette County can be checked on the FCC map by toggling 5G technology layers and providers:

County-level limitation:

  • Public datasets do not consistently provide a countywide statistic for “percent of residents with 5G device/service.” Most public information is limited to coverage claims and device adoption proxies (such as smartphone ownership) rather than confirmed 5G usage.

Mobile as a substitute for fixed broadband

Rural households sometimes rely on mobile data plans where fixed broadband options are limited or costly. The ACS can identify households reporting cellular data plan subscriptions, but it does not directly measure:

  • Whether mobile is the only internet service used at home (beyond combinations of subscription types).
  • Actual data consumption patterns, throttling, deprioritization, or hotspot dependence.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

Smartphone prevalence (general approach, county limitations)

The most common consumer mobile device type is the smartphone, and smartphones are the primary means of accessing mobile broadband networks. However, county-level smartphone ownership is not consistently published as a standard official statistic in the way that “cellular data plan subscription” is available through ACS.

What is available at county level:

  • Household computing devices and internet subscription types in ACS (devices may be captured as desktop/laptop/tablet in some tables; smartphone ownership is not always directly isolated).
  • Cellular data plan subscription as a proxy for mobile internet use.

Best available official source for county-level device/internet subscription indicators:

Practical interpretation constraint:

  • Device mix beyond “has a cellular data plan subscription” is difficult to quantify for Marquette County using only official county-level public tables; vendor analytics and private surveys exist but are not uniformly comparable or publicly documented at county resolution.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity

Rural density and tower economics

  • Lower population density generally means fewer towers per square mile and fewer small-cell deployments, influencing both coverage gaps and capacity constraints during peak use.
  • Coverage is often better along state highways and towns and less consistent in sparsely populated areas.

Terrain, vegetation, and water features

  • Glacial landforms, tree cover, and building penetration losses can reduce signal strength, especially for higher-frequency bands used for some 5G layers.
  • Lakes and wetlands can create pockets where tower placement is constrained by land use, zoning, or lack of backhaul routes.

Seasonal population fluctuations

  • Areas with lakes and seasonal recreation can experience variable demand, which affects capacity more than nominal coverage. Public county-level datasets generally do not quantify seasonal capacity constraints.

Age distribution and income

Demographic characteristics such as age and income correlate with smartphone ownership and reliance on mobile-only internet in many studies, but county-specific quantification should rely on official demographic tables:

Connectivity-specific limitation:

  • Public, county-level cross-tabs directly linking age/income to “mobile-only internet reliance” are not always available in a single table; analysis often requires combining ACS tables and recognizing margins of error.

Where to verify county and state broadband context

Summary of what is measurable at county level

  • Adoption (household use): ACS tables on telephone/internet subscription types, including cellular data plan subscriptions, available via Census.gov. These describe reported subscription patterns, not signal quality.
  • Availability (network coverage): FCC BDC mobile coverage layers for LTE/5G by provider, available via the FCC National Broadband Map. These are modeled/provider-reported availability, not guaranteed performance.
  • Device types: Smartphones dominate mobile access generally, but public county-level smartphone ownership is not consistently available as a standard official statistic; ACS provides partial device/subscription indicators rather than a definitive “smartphone share” for Marquette County.

Social Media Trends

Marquette County is a small, rural county in central Wisconsin, with its county seat in Montello and local recreation assets such as Lake Puckaway and nearby public lands shaping community life and information flow. Its older age profile and lower population density than Wisconsin’s urban counties generally align with lower overall social media intensity, heavier reliance on Facebook for local news and community groups, and comparatively less use of fast‑moving, video‑first platforms than in large metro areas.

User statistics (penetration / share of residents using social media)

  • County-specific penetration: No regularly updated, statistically representative dataset publishes Marquette County–only social media penetration by platform. County-level measurement is typically derived from proprietary ad-audience tools or modeled estimates rather than public survey microdata.
  • Best public benchmarks for Marquette County context (U.S. adults):
    • About 69% of U.S. adults use social media (overall). Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
    • Wisconsin counties with older, rural populations tend to track closer to the lower end of national usage ranges because social media use declines with age and is lower in rural areas on some platforms (details below). Source: Pew Research Center.

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

Public, high-quality surveys consistently show age as the strongest predictor of platform mix:

  • Highest overall use: Ages 18–29 lead across most platforms; they are also the most likely to use multiple platforms daily. Source: Pew Research Center: Social Media Use.
  • Middle-age adults (30–49): High use overall; typically strong adoption of Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram, with rising use of short-form video. Source: Pew Research Center.
  • Older adults (50–64 and 65+): Lower overall use than younger groups, but comparatively higher reliance on Facebook and YouTube than on platforms such as Snapchat; this pattern is especially relevant for Marquette County due to its rural, older demographic profile typical of central Wisconsin counties. Source: Pew Research Center.

Gender breakdown

Pew’s platform-by-platform findings show clear gender skews that are useful as directional indicators for Marquette County:

  • Women are more likely than men to use Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest. Source: Pew Research Center: platform demographics.
  • Men are somewhat more likely than women to use YouTube in some survey waves, and usage gaps are smaller on several large platforms than on Pinterest. Source: Pew Research Center.
  • Overall, gender differences are typically platform-specific rather than reflecting a large overall “social media user vs non-user” split. Source: Pew Research Center.

Most-used platforms (public benchmark percentages)

No public source provides platform-use percentages at the Marquette County level; the most reliable comparable figures are national adult estimates:

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and platform preferences)

  • Facebook as the local community hub: Rural counties often use Facebook for community announcements, buy/sell exchanges, event promotion, and school/sports updates. Nationally, Facebook remains one of the most-used platforms among adults and is relatively strong among older adults. Source: Pew Research Center.
  • YouTube as the broadest “reach” platform: YouTube’s very high adult penetration supports use for how-to content, local interest videos, news clips, and entertainment across age groups, including older adults. Source: Pew Research Center.
  • Short-form video concentrated among younger residents: TikTok and Snapchat skew younger, so total county impact depends heavily on the size of the 18–29 and teen/young-adult segments. Source: Pew Research Center.
  • News and information use: Social media commonly functions as a news pathway; Pew reports that a substantial share of U.S. adults “sometimes” or “often” get news from social media, with variation by platform and age. Source: Pew Research Center: Social Media and News.
  • Engagement tends to be “group-centric” and event-driven in smaller communities: Compared with large metros, interactions often cluster around local institutions (schools, county fairs, outdoor recreation, town government updates), with higher visibility for posts tied to immediate community relevance rather than broad interest content; this aligns with rural network structures where fewer local pages and groups concentrate attention.

Notes on interpretation: The percentages above are national adult benchmarks from Pew Research Center and are the most widely cited, transparent measures available. They provide a reliable reference frame for Marquette County, but they are not a substitute for a county-representative survey.

Family & Associates Records

Marquette County, Wisconsin maintains family-related public records primarily through the county Register of Deeds and the Wisconsin Vital Records Office. Vital records generally include birth, death, marriage, and divorce records. Marquette County provides local issuance and record services via the Marquette County Register of Deeds. Adoption records are generally treated as confidential in Wisconsin and are not handled as routine public records; access is typically restricted and managed through state-level processes rather than general public inspection.

Public-facing databases are limited for vital events. Statewide indexes and certified-record ordering are administered by the Wisconsin Department of Health Services – Vital Records. Court-related family and associate records (for example, divorce case files, name changes, guardianships, restraining orders) are maintained by the circuit court and can be located through the Wisconsin Circuit Court Access (WCCA) portal, which provides case summary information for many matters.

Access occurs online through WCCA for eligible case information and through state vital records resources for ordering certified copies. In-person access and requests are handled at the Register of Deeds office and the Clerk of Courts for court files (subject to court rules). Privacy restrictions commonly apply to birth records for recent decades, certain sensitive court case types, and sealed or confidential filings; identification, fees, and statutory limits govern release.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

Marriage records

  • Marriage license and marriage certificate (register of deeds copy): The county-issued record of a marriage license application and the recorded proof that a marriage was performed and returned for filing.
  • State vital record (Wisconsin marriage certificate copy): A statewide vital record maintained by the Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS), based on the county filing.

Divorce-related records

  • Divorce court case record: The circuit court case file, which typically includes the Judgment of Divorce (sometimes called a divorce decree), orders, findings, and related pleadings.
  • Divorce certificate (state vital record): A statewide vital record maintained by Wisconsin DHS summarizing key facts about the divorce, separate from the full court file.

Annulment records

  • Annulment court case record: Annulments are handled through the circuit court and maintained as a civil family case file with a judgment/order that determines marital status.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

Marquette County marriage records

  • Filed/maintained at the county level: Marquette County Register of Deeds maintains local marriage records as part of county vital records responsibilities.
  • State-level copies: Wisconsin DHS maintains statewide marriage records.
  • Access methods commonly used:
    • Direct request to the Marquette County Register of Deeds for certified or uncertified copies, using county procedures (in-person, mail, or other methods as provided by the office).
    • Request through Wisconsin DHS Vital Records Office for state-issued copies.
    • Search tools/indexes: Some marriage indexes may be available through state or third-party resources; certified copies are issued only by the appropriate government office.

Marquette County divorce and annulment records

  • Filed/maintained at the county level: Divorce and annulment case records are maintained by the Clerk of Circuit Court for Marquette County as part of the county circuit court record system.
  • State-level divorce certificate: Wisconsin DHS maintains divorce certificates (vital records summary).
  • Access methods commonly used:
    • Court record access via the Clerk of Circuit Court: Copies of judgments and other filings are obtained through the clerk’s records process.
    • Online statewide case lookup (non-confidential case information): Wisconsin court case information is commonly available through the Wisconsin Circuit Court Access system (CCAP) for many cases, subject to confidentiality rules and redactions. Link: https://wcca.wicourts.gov/
    • Certified copies: Certified copies of divorce judgments are issued by the Clerk of Circuit Court; certified divorce certificates are issued by Wisconsin DHS.

Typical information included in these records

Marriage license/certificate records (county/state vital record)

Commonly include:

  • Full names of the parties (including maiden name where applicable)
  • Date and place of marriage
  • Ages or dates of birth (varies by record version and time period)
  • Residences and places of birth (often included on license applications)
  • Officiant name/title and officiant’s certification
  • Names of witnesses (often recorded)
  • Date the marriage record was filed with the Register of Deeds
  • Internal file numbers or registration identifiers

Divorce court records (circuit court case file)

Commonly include:

  • Case caption, case number, and filing date
  • Names of parties and attorneys (where applicable)
  • Judgment of Divorce date and terms
  • Orders on legal custody, physical placement/parenting time (where applicable)
  • Child support terms (where applicable)
  • Maintenance/spousal support terms (where applicable)
  • Property division and debt allocation terms
  • Name change provisions (where ordered)
  • Related motions, affidavits, financial disclosure forms, and transcripts (presence varies by case and time period)

Divorce certificate (state vital record summary)

Commonly includes:

  • Names of parties
  • Date and county of divorce
  • Case number or state registration identifiers (varies)
  • Basic event details intended for vital records purposes (not the full terms of the judgment)

Annulment court records

Commonly include:

  • Case caption and number, filing date, and jurisdictional facts
  • Judgment/order addressing the validity of the marriage and marital status
  • Associated orders addressing children, support, and property issues where applicable

Privacy or legal restrictions

Marriage records

  • Wisconsin vital records access controls: Wisconsin law limits access to certain vital records and certified copies. Eligibility rules and identification requirements apply to certified copies; non-certified copies and public indexes may be more broadly available depending on the record and the requester’s purpose.
  • Redactions and identity verification: Offices may redact limited information and typically require identity documentation for certified copies.

Divorce and annulment records

  • Presumption of public access with exceptions: Many circuit court records are publicly accessible, but specific filings and information can be confidential by statute or court order.
  • Common confidentiality categories: Sealed records, protected information about minors, and certain sensitive financial or personal identifiers may be restricted or redacted.
  • Online access limitations: Wisconsin’s online case search generally provides docket-level information and limited document availability, and excludes or masks confidential cases and protected data.

Primary custodians (Marquette County and Wisconsin)

  • Marquette County Register of Deeds: Local marriage records (licenses/certificates) and issuance of certified copies under Wisconsin vital records rules.
  • Marquette County Clerk of Circuit Court: Divorce and annulment court case files, judgments, and certified copies of court documents.
  • Wisconsin DHS Vital Records Office: Statewide marriage and divorce vital records (certificates) subject to statutory access restrictions.

Education, Employment and Housing

Marquette County is a rural county in central Wisconsin, generally associated with the Montello–Westfield corridor and a landscape of lakes, forests, and agricultural land. The county’s population is small and dispersed across towns and unincorporated areas, with services concentrated in the City of Montello and the Villages of Westfield and Oxford.

Education Indicators

Public schools (counts and names)

Marquette County’s K–12 public education is primarily served by three school districts. Public-school naming and building configurations change periodically (consolidations, grade reconfigurations), so the most reliable “current school list” is the state directory:

  • Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (DPI) school directory for Marquette County (public schools and grade ranges) via the Wisconsin DPI School Directory.

Districts serving the county include:

  • Montello School District
  • Westfield School District
  • Oxford School District

(Exact school-building counts and names should be taken from the DPI directory above because “school” may refer to a single PK–12 building in one district and multiple buildings in another.)

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratios and other staffing metrics are reported by district and school through the Wisconsin DPI “District Profiles.” The county does not publish a single unified ratio because staffing and enrollment differ by district and building. Authoritative district-level indicators are available through Wisconsin School and District Report Cards.
  • Graduation rates (4-year cohort) are published annually in the DPI report cards at the district and high school levels. Marquette County does not have a countywide graduation rate that is methodologically preferred over the district/school rates; the DPI report cards are the standard reference.

Adult educational attainment

County-level adult educational attainment is best sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS):

  • Standard measures include the share of adults age 25+ with a high school diploma (or equivalent) or higher, and the share with a bachelor’s degree or higher.
  • The most recent ACS 5-year estimates for Marquette County are available through data.census.gov (ACS educational attainment).
    (These values vary year-to-year; ACS 5-year estimates are the primary small-county benchmark.)

Notable programs (STEM, vocational, Advanced Placement)

  • Program availability (Career and Technical Education pathways, dual credit, AP course access, agriculture/technical programs) is district-specific and typically described in district course catalogs and DPI district profiles/report cards.
  • For county-relevant vocational training and adult education, a common regional proxy is participation through Wisconsin’s technical college system. Marquette County residents are generally served by nearby technical-college options depending on residence boundaries and program location; statewide information is available from the Wisconsin Technical College System.
    (Program lists are not standardized at the county level; the best available “definitive” program inventories are district catalogs and WTCS program directories.)

School safety measures and counseling resources

  • Wisconsin public schools operate under state requirements and local policies for emergency preparedness, threat assessment, and student services (counseling/psychological services), but specific measures (e.g., school resource officers, secure entry vestibules, anonymous tip lines) vary by district and building.
  • The most consistent public references are district-level student services pages and board policies; statewide context and requirements are summarized through Wisconsin DPI resources, including Wisconsin DPI School Safety and student services resources via DPI Student Services/Prevention and Wellness.
    (Countywide, school-specific inventories of safety hardware and counseling staffing are typically not compiled in a single public dataset.)

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year available)

  • The most recent official local unemployment estimates are published through the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) program and Wisconsin’s labor market information portals. County annual averages and monthly values are available via BLS LAUS and Wisconsin labor market tools hosted by the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development (DWD) LMI.
    (A single “most recent year” value is best taken from the latest annual average series for Marquette County in LAUS/DWD.)

Major industries and employment sectors

For small rural Wisconsin counties, the dominant employment sectors commonly include:

  • Health care and social assistance
  • Retail trade
  • Education services (public schools)
  • Manufacturing (often smaller plants or regional commuting to manufacturing centers)
  • Construction
  • Public administration
  • Accommodation and food services (seasonal influence where recreation/lakes are significant)

The authoritative industry breakdown by NAICS sector is available from the Census Bureau’s County Business Patterns (employer establishments and employment by sector) and from ACS industry-of-employment tables (resident workforce by sector).

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

  • Common occupational groups in similar rural counties include office/administrative support, production, transportation/material moving, sales, health care support, construction/trades, and management (often concentrated among small-business owners, public sector, and regional employers).
  • The most defensible county-level occupation profile for residents comes from ACS occupation tables on data.census.gov. For detailed occupational employment and wages, sub-state model-based estimates are compiled in tools linked by DWD LMI.

Commuting patterns and mean commute times

  • Rural counties with limited in-county job density typically show high levels of out-commuting to larger employment centers in neighboring counties (e.g., for manufacturing, health care, regional retail, and public sector hubs).
  • Mean travel time to work and commuting mode shares (drive alone, carpool, work from home) are measured by ACS and published on data.census.gov (ACS commuting).
    (Mean commute time is the standard comparable metric; small counties can show higher variance across 5-year periods.)

Local employment vs. out-of-county work

  • The most direct measures are “inflow/outflow” commuter patterns from the Census Bureau’s LEHD program. County-to-county commuting flows and the share of workers living and working in the same county are available via LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) and summarized in tools such as OnTheMap.
    (These data typically show rural counties exporting a significant share of workers to nearby counties.)

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership rate and rental share

  • Homeownership vs. renter occupancy is measured by the ACS. Marquette County’s tenure profile is best taken from the most recent ACS 5-year estimates on data.census.gov (housing tenure).
    (As a rural county, the ownership share is typically higher than large urban counties; exact percentages should be cited from ACS tables.)

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median owner-occupied home value is available from ACS (5-year). This provides a consistent county benchmark and is published on data.census.gov (median home value).
  • For market trend proxies (sale prices, appreciation, days on market), third-party real estate indices exist but are not official statistics. The most defensible public-sector trend context is assessed values and levy information from state and county sources, plus ACS value changes across periods.

Typical rent prices

  • Median gross rent is available from ACS 5-year estimates via data.census.gov (median gross rent).
    (Rents in rural counties are typically lower than metro areas but can be constrained by limited rental supply and seasonal/second-home dynamics; the definitive benchmark remains the ACS median.)

Types of housing

Housing stock in Marquette County is characterized by:

  • Single-family detached homes in towns and village/city areas
  • Manufactured homes (more common in rural areas)
  • Seasonal/recreational housing around lakes and wooded parcels
  • A smaller base of apartments/duplexes concentrated in Montello, Westfield, and other village centers
    These distributions are quantified in ACS structure-type tables on data.census.gov (housing units by type).

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools/amenities)

  • The county’s most walkable access to schools, libraries, groceries, and clinics is generally found in Montello and Westfield village centers. Outside these nodes, residential patterns are predominantly auto-oriented, with longer travel distances to schools and services.
  • Proximity-to-amenities metrics are not routinely published as a single county dataset; locality characteristics are typically described in municipal comprehensive plans and county planning documents.

Property tax overview (average rate and typical homeowner cost)

  • Wisconsin property taxes are driven by local mill rates/levies and assessed value, varying by municipality, school district, and technical college district.
  • Countywide reference materials include the Wisconsin Department of Revenue’s annual property tax and assessment reporting. Official context and typical tax bills by municipality are best sourced from Wisconsin Department of Revenue property tax and assessment reports.
    (A single county “average rate” can be misleading because mill rates vary materially across towns and villages; the most accurate approach uses municipality-specific mill rates applied to assessed values.)

Data availability note: Several requested indicators (school-by-school student–teacher ratios, school-building lists, graduation rates by school, detailed safety/counseling staffing) are published reliably at the district/school level through Wisconsin DPI rather than as a single county aggregate. Employment commuting flows and local-vs-out-of-county work are most reliably measured using LEHD/OnTheMap rather than ACS alone.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Wisconsin