York County Local Demographic Profile

York County, Nebraska — key demographics (U.S. Census Bureau: 2019–2023 ACS 5-year estimates; 2020 Decennial Census)

Population

  • Total population: ~14,000 (2020 Census: 14,125; 2019–2023 ACS estimate ~14.0k)

Age

  • Median age: ~42 years
  • Under 18: ~23–24%
  • 18 to 64: ~56%
  • 65 and over: ~20–21%

Gender

  • Female: ~50–51%
  • Male: ~49–50%

Race and ethnicity (Hispanic is of any race)

  • White, non-Hispanic: ~89–91%
  • Hispanic/Latino: ~5–7%
  • Black/African American: ~1%
  • American Indian/Alaska Native: ~0.5–0.7%
  • Asian: ~0.3–0.5%
  • Two or more races: ~2%

Households and housing

  • Households: ~5,800–6,000
  • Average household size: ~2.3–2.4
  • Family households: ~60–65% (married-couple ~50–55%)
  • Nonfamily households: ~35–40% (living alone ~30%)
  • Owner-occupied: ~70–72%; renter-occupied: ~28–30%
  • Housing units: ~6,200–6,500; vacancy rate: ~7–9%
  • Median household income: roughly mid-$60,000s
  • Poverty rate: roughly 8–10%

Insights

  • Stable, modestly aging population with about one in five residents 65+
  • Predominantly non-Hispanic White, with a small but present Hispanic community
  • Household composition leans toward family households and high homeownership typical of rural Nebraska

Email Usage in York County

York County, Nebraska snapshot (population ≈14,100):

  • Estimated email users (age 13+): ≈10,300 (about three-quarters of residents).
  • Gender split among users: ~51% female, ~49% male (no meaningful gap in usage).
  • Age distribution of email users:
    • 13–17: ~5%
    • 18–34: ~24%
    • 35–54: ~36%
    • 55–64: ~15%
    • 65+: 20% Adoption is highest among 18–54 (95%+ use email), moderate for 55–64 (90%+), and lower for 65+ (70%+), driving the above mix.

Digital access trends:

  • About 85% of households subscribe to fixed broadband; roughly 9 in 10 households have a computer/smartphone. Around 1 in 10 households are smartphone‑only for internet.
  • Daily email use is near-universal for working‑age adults; seniors use email less frequently but steadily rising with smartphone adoption.
  • Connectivity is densest in the City of York and along the I‑80 corridor, with higher‑speed tiers common there; rural townships rely more on fixed‑wireless/DSL, where speeds and reliability vary.

Local density/connectivity facts:

  • Land area ≈575 sq mi; population density ≈24 residents/sq mi, a rural profile that explains remaining last‑mile gaps despite generally strong coverage in town.

Mobile Phone Usage in York County

York County, Nebraska — mobile phone usage snapshot (2024 modeled)

Population and user estimates

  • Residents: ~14,100
  • Mobile phone users (any cellphone): ~11,500 residents
  • Smartphone users: ~10,400 residents
  • Adult smartphone penetration: ~84% of adults (vs ~88% statewide), reflecting an older age mix locally
  • Households: ~5,900 total; with a cellular data plan for internet: ~4,100 (≈70%); mobile-only internet households (primarily rely on cellular data, no fixed home broadband): ~600 (≈10%) vs ≈13% statewide

Demographic breakdown (people, 2024 modeled)

  • Age 18–29: ~1,800 residents; smartphone users ~1,740 (≈95%); any cellphone ~1,800 (≈98%)
  • Age 30–49: ~3,400 residents; smartphone users ~3,150 (≈93%); any cellphone ~3,320 (≈98%)
  • Age 50–64: ~2,500 residents; smartphone users ~2,030 (≈80%); any cellphone ~2,360 (≈93%)
  • Age 65+: ~3,000 residents; smartphone users ~2,070 (≈70%); any cellphone ~2,520 (≈85%)
  • Teens 13–17: ~1,550 residents; smartphone users ~1,400 (≈90%); any cellphone ~1,470 (≈95%)

What’s different from Nebraska statewide trends

  • Smartphone ownership slightly lower: York adults ~84% vs Nebraska ~88%, largely due to a higher share of residents 65+
  • Fewer mobile-only households: ~10% in York vs ~13% statewide; older residents are more likely to maintain fixed broadband or landline alternatives
  • Usage mix skews more toward voice/SMS among seniors and toward multi-line family plans; urban counties show heavier app- and video-centric usage
  • Daytime device density spikes above resident counts along I‑80/US‑81 due to freight and travel, a pattern less pronounced in non-corridor rural counties
  • Agricultural IoT and machine telematics lines form a larger slice of total mobile connections than in metro counties, supporting precision agriculture and remote monitoring

Digital infrastructure highlights

  • Coverage
    • 4G LTE: Near-universal outdoor coverage in populated areas from the three national carriers across the county
    • 5G: Broad low-band 5G coverage countywide; mid-band 5G capacity concentrated in and around York city, I‑80, and US‑81 corridors. Urban Nebraska (Omaha/Lincoln) has more extensive mid-band 5G depth; York’s mid-band is strong along highways but thinner in outlying sections
  • Backhaul and fiber
    • Multiple regional and national fiber routes parallel I‑80 and tie into York, improving cell-site backhaul and resilience compared with many rural counties off the interstate grid
    • Regional incumbents and rural providers operate fiber and fixed wireless that support tower backhaul and business connectivity, reinforcing overall mobile reliability
  • Sites and performance characteristics
    • Macro towers are clustered along I‑80, US‑81, and around York city; small-cell density is limited outside key nodes
    • Indoor coverage can be variable in metal agricultural structures and at greater distances from corridors; carriers commonly mitigate with mid-band buildouts and in‑building solutions where deployed
  • Emergency and public coverage
    • E911 location and Wireless Emergency Alerts supported by major carriers; coverage on primary highways is robust, supporting public safety and logistics communications

Key takeaways

  • York’s mobile ecosystem is robust for a rural county due to interstate-adjacent infrastructure, but user adoption patterns—especially among seniors—pull smartphone penetration a few points below the Nebraska average
  • The county relies less on mobile-only home internet than the state overall, reflecting demographics and the presence of viable fixed options
  • Mobility demand is amplified by through-traffic and agriculture, driving distinctive peaks and IoT usage that differ from urban counties’ app-heavy consumer traffic

Notes on methods and sources

  • Population, household counts, and age structure derived from recent U.S. Census Bureau/ACS releases; mobile adoption rates by age applied from Pew Research Center’s 2023–2024 U.S. smartphone and cellphone ownership benchmarks with rural adjustments to yield county-level estimates for 2024
  • “Cellular data plan” household share aligns with ACS S2801 definitions; “mobile-only households” estimated using Pew smartphone-only internet access shares adjusted to county demographics
  • Coverage characterizations synthesized from 2024 FCC carrier coverage filings and widely reported carrier buildout patterns in Nebraska along I‑80 and US‑81

Social Media Trends in York County

York County, NE social media snapshot (2024–2025)

Population base

  • Total residents: 14,125 (2020 Census)
  • Modeled local social-media users (13+): ≈9,000 people
    • ≈64% of total population
    • ≈75% of residents aged 13+

User mix (share of local social-media users)

  • By age
    • 13–17: 9%
    • 18–29: 18%
    • 30–49: 33%
    • 50–64: 23%
    • 65+: 17%
  • By gender
    • Female: 53%
    • Male: 47%

Most-used platforms in York County (share of local social-media users; monthly)

  • YouTube: 84% (~7,600 users)
  • Facebook: 68% (~6,100)
  • Instagram: 45% (~4,050)
  • TikTok: 37% (~3,330)
  • Pinterest: 30% (~2,700)
  • Snapchat: 29% (~2,610)
  • LinkedIn: 24% (~2,160)
  • X (Twitter): 19% (~1,710)

Behavioral trends

  • Facebook is the community hub: heavy use of local groups, Marketplace, school and county updates, high school sports, events, and fundraising. Older adults skew strongly to Facebook and Messenger.
  • Video is dominant: YouTube for DIY, farm/equipment repair, church services, and how-to content; short-form vertical video (Instagram Reels/TikTok) drives discovery for local businesses and creators.
  • Younger cohorts (13–29) favor Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat for daily communication, sports highlights, and local hangouts; stories and DMs outperform feeds.
  • Pinterest performs with women 25–54 for home, recipes, crafts, and boutique retail; it reliably drives website traffic and saved intent.
  • X (Twitter) is niche, used mainly by news/sports followers and a small professional set; LinkedIn is used for hiring in healthcare, manufacturing, and ag operations.
  • Peak engagement windows: weekday evenings (7–9 pm CT), lunch (11:30 am–1 pm), and during weather events or school announcements.
  • Commerce and calls to action: Facebook/Instagram deliver the highest local response for event RSVPs, ticketing, seasonal promotions, and service bookings. Buy/sell/trade groups and Marketplace materially influence local purchasing.
  • Trust cues matter: posts featuring recognizable local faces, schools, youth activities, or community involvement see outsized engagement; clear offers and phone-friendly CTAs work best for 50+.

Method note: Figures are modeled local estimates using the 2020 Census population for York County and 2023–2024 Pew Research platform-by-age adoption rates, weighted to the county’s age profile. Percentages are rounded and suitable for planning.