Wichita County Local Demographic Profile

Wichita County, Kansas – key demographics

Population size

  • 2,152 (2020 Census)
  • ~2,080 (2023 Census Bureau estimate, Vintage 2023)

Age

  • Median age: ~37 years (ACS 2018–2022)
  • Under 18: ~27%
  • 18–64: ~57%
  • 65 and over: ~16%

Gender

  • Male: ~51%
  • Female: ~49%

Race and ethnicity (shares; totals may round)

  • Hispanic or Latino (any race): ~31%
  • White, non-Hispanic: ~60%
  • Other, non-Hispanic (combined): ~9%
    • Two or more races: ~5%
    • American Indian/Alaska Native, Black, Asian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander: each ~1% or less

Households and housing

  • Households: ~840 (ACS 2018–2022)
  • Average household size: ~2.5
  • Family households: ~66% of households
  • Married-couple households: ~56%
  • Households with children under 18: ~38%
  • Living alone: ~25%
  • Owner-occupied housing rate: ~75% (renter-occupied ~25%)

Notes and sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2020 Decennial Census (DHC), American Community Survey 2018–2022 5-year estimates, and Vintage 2023 population estimates. Figures rounded for clarity.

Email Usage in Wichita County

Wichita County, Kansas (pop. ≈2,050; area 719 sq mi) has a very low density (~2.9 residents/sq mi), with most connectivity centered in Leoti.

Estimated email users: ≈1,560 (about 76% of residents), derived from rural U.S. adoption benchmarks scaled to local age mix.

Age distribution of email users:

  • 13–17: 6%
  • 18–29: 15%
  • 30–49: 34%
  • 50–64: 27%
  • 65+: 18%

Gender split among email users: ~51% male, 49% female, mirroring county demographics.

Digital access trends:

  • Home broadband adoption ≈72% of households, with remaining users relying on mobile-only, fixed wireless, or satellite.
  • Smartphone ownership ≈80% of adults; 12–15% are smartphone‑only internet users.
  • Fiber/coax availability is largely in and near Leoti; outside town, fixed wireless and satellite are common, with typical service tiers in the 25–100 Mbps range.
  • Low population density raises last‑mile costs and contributes to coverage gaps and lower speeds for outlying farms and ranches.
  • Seniors show lower email intensity than working‑age adults, but usage is rising as healthcare, ag services, and government move online.

Overall, email is a mainstream channel countywide, strongest among ages 30–64 and in/near Leoti’s wired footprint.

Mobile Phone Usage in Wichita County

Wichita County, KS: Mobile phone usage snapshot (2025)

Topline user estimates

  • Population and households: ~2,120 residents and ~820 households (2023 Census estimates)
  • Smartphone users: ~1,500–1,600 residents 13+ use a smartphone (central estimate ~1,530), reflecting strong adoption among working-age adults and teens, with lower uptake among seniors
  • Mobile-as-primary internet: ~20–25% of households rely primarily on cellular or fixed-wireless data for home internet (vs ~12–15% statewide), driven by rural geography and patchier wired options
  • Device mix: Android remains slightly more common than iOS (typical rural KS pattern), with a higher-than-state share of prepaid and regional-carrier lines

Demographic patterns shaping usage

  • Age: Older than the state overall (median age low-40s vs Kansas high-30s). Adoption is near-universal among 18–49, solid among 50–64, and meaningfully lower in 65+—creating a larger senior digital gap than the statewide picture
  • Ethnicity: A sizable Hispanic/Latino community (roughly a quarter to a third of residents) drives high smartphone-dependency for communication, work, and school; bilingual households show above-average use of messaging apps and data-only plans
  • Income and occupations: Agriculture and small-business employment raise demand for reliable voice/coverage over peak-speed performance, and encourage the use of regional carriers and fixed-wireless/Satellite as primary broadband in outlying areas

Digital infrastructure and coverage

  • Carriers present: AT&T (including FirstNet), Verizon, T-Mobile, and regional Nex-Tech Wireless provide service; roaming often supported
  • 5G footprint: Low-band 5G covers the main corridors and Leoti; mid-band 5G (higher capacity) is concentrated in/near town centers with LTE fallback across farmland. Expect noticeable signal fades at county edges and along low-traffic section roads
  • Backhaul and fiber: Pioneer Communications operates fiber in and around Leoti, supporting both FTTH and cellular backhaul; fiber thins outside town, where microwave backhaul and legacy copper persist
  • Fixed wireless and satellite: T-Mobile Home Internet and Verizon 5G/LTE Home are available to many in/near town; Starlink fills gaps beyond terrestrial signal reach
  • Tower layout: A small number of macro sites anchor service along K‑96 and K‑25, with broad cells serving low-density areas; in-building coverage can be variable in metal structures typical of farm and commercial buildings

How Wichita County differs from Kansas overall

  • Higher mobile dependence for home broadband: Cellular and fixed-wireless usage as the primary household internet is meaningfully higher than the state average, reflecting fewer ubiquitous wired options outside town limits
  • Capacity vs coverage tradeoff: Coverage is prioritized over capacity. Typical speeds are more variable than in metro Kansas due to sparse mid-band 5G/LTE sectors and longer inter-site distances
  • Carrier mix: Regional carrier presence (notably Nex-Tech Wireless) and a larger prepaid share differentiate the county from urban Kansas markets dominated by Big‑3 postpaid plans
  • Upgrade cycles: Handset replacement cycles tend to be longer than the state average, slightly reducing penetration of the newest 5G features
  • Senior adoption gap: A larger 65+ share translates to a more pronounced gap in smartphone adoption and app-based service use relative to statewide norms

Actionable insights

  • Network planning: Additional mid-band 5G sectors in Leoti and along K‑96/K‑25 would materially improve peak and indoor performance, especially for fixed-wireless users
  • Public services: Targeted digital literacy and low-cost device programs for older adults would close the adoption gap more than similar efforts would in urban Kansas
  • Business strategy: Regional and prepaid offerings, bilingual support, and farm/ranch‑friendly coverage guarantees are more influential to customer acquisition than headline 5G speeds
  • Resilience: Maintaining microwave and fiber backhaul diversity and deploying enterprise-grade boosters in metal buildings can mitigate the most common coverage pain points

Notes on sources and method

  • Population and household counts derive from recent Census/ACS estimates for small counties
  • Adoption and mobile-reliance figures are county‑level estimates synthesized from rural Kansas ACS subscription patterns, Pew Research adoption rates by age, and carrier coverage disclosures for western Kansas
  • Carrier presence and infrastructure characteristics reflect published coverage maps, regional operator footprints, and typical rural network design in western Kansas

Social Media Trends in Wichita County

Social media usage in Wichita County, Kansas (2025)

At-a-glance user stats

  • Estimated social media users (age 13+): ~1,500 residents
  • Penetration (share of 13+ using at least one platform): ~80%
  • Daily users: ~68% of 13+ residents (about 85% of social users)
  • Average platforms per user: 2.5–3
  • Primary access: smartphone-first; broadband gaps push heavier use of mobile apps and short video

Most-used platforms among adults (18+)

  • YouTube: 78%
  • Facebook: 71%
  • Instagram: 38%
  • TikTok: 31%
  • Pinterest: 32%
  • Snapchat: 24%
  • WhatsApp: 16%
  • LinkedIn: 14%
  • X (Twitter): 14%
  • Reddit: 10%
  • Nextdoor: ~3%

Teens (13–17) skew

  • YouTube: ~92%
  • TikTok: ~62%
  • Snapchat: ~60%
  • Instagram: ~58%
  • Facebook: ~20%

Age-group penetration (share using any social platform)

  • 13–17: ~95%
  • 18–29: ~93%
  • 30–49: ~85%
  • 50–64: ~70%
  • 65+: ~50%

Gender breakdown

  • Users: ~51% female, ~49% male (mirrors county population)
  • Platform skews:
    • Women: higher on Facebook and Pinterest; strong participation in local buy/sell, school/booster, church, and community groups
    • Men: higher on YouTube, X, Reddit; strong consumption of ag, mechanics/DIY, weather, and sports content

Behavioral trends and local patterns

  • Facebook as the community hub: Primary channel for local news, school sports, county fair updates, church announcements, obituaries, and buy/sell/trade groups. Facebook Messenger is the default DM for residents 30+ and small businesses.
  • Video-first consumption: YouTube for how-to and repair content (farm equipment, home/auto), severe weather coverage, local sports highlights, and church service streams. Short-form video (Reels/TikTok) is growing fastest across all ages.
  • Youth attention split: Teens and 18–24s toggle between Snapchat (messaging + Stories), Instagram (Stories/Reels), and TikTok (entertainment and trends). Facebook is mainly for events and family connections in this group.
  • Hispanic/Latino connectivity: WhatsApp and Spanish-language Facebook groups support family ties, events, and local services discovery; cross-posting between WhatsApp and Facebook is common.
  • Time-of-day peaks: Morning check-ins (6–8 a.m.), lunch scrolls (12–1 p.m.), and strongest activity evenings (7–10 p.m.). During planting/harvest, usage shifts later at night; weather events drive real-time surges on Facebook and YouTube.
  • Trust and discovery: Content from known local pages (schools, county agencies, churches, boosters, radio) gets outsized engagement. Recommendations spread through comments and shares more than paid ads.
  • Local commerce: Small businesses rely on Facebook Pages/Groups and Marketplace for reach; Instagram presence is increasing for boutiques, salons, and food trucks; TikTok is emerging for quick menu/features videos.
  • Creator behavior: A small but active set of residents posts short-form video around ag life, hunting/fishing, sports, and rural humor; cross-posting to Reels/TikTok is standard to maximize reach.

Notes on the figures

  • Percentages are modeled for Wichita County using recent Pew Research Center adoption rates (adults and teens), rural usage differentials, and the county’s age mix from Census/ACS, adjusted to 2025. They reflect typical patterns in rural western Kansas communities with similar demographics and connectivity.