Phillips County is located in north-central Kansas along the Nebraska border, part of the state’s High Plains region. Established in 1867 and named for Civil War officer William A. Phillips, the county developed around agriculture and rail-era settlement patterns typical of rural western Kansas. It is small in population, with roughly 5,000 residents, and is characterized by low-density communities and extensive farmland. The landscape consists largely of gently rolling plains, stream valleys, and cultivated fields, supporting an economy centered on crop production and livestock, along with local services tied to the regional farm economy. Communities in the county retain a strongly rural character, with civic life often organized around schools, churches, and county institutions. The county seat and largest city is Phillipsburg, which serves as the primary center for government, commerce, and health and education services in the area.

Phillips County Local Demographic Profile

Phillips County is a rural county in north-central Kansas along the Nebraska border, with the city of Phillipsburg serving as the county seat. The county is part of the state’s agricultural High Plains region and is administered locally through county government based in Phillipsburg.

For local government and planning resources, visit the Phillips County official website.

Population Size

Exact, current county-level population figures vary by Census product and reference year. The primary authoritative sources for county population are the Census Bureau’s decennial census and annual population estimates. County profile tables and the full set of population estimates are available through the U.S. Census Bureau data portal (data.census.gov) and the Census Bureau’s Decennial Census program.

Age & Gender

County-level age distribution and gender ratio are published by the U.S. Census Bureau via the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates and decennial census tabulations. Standard tables include age by sex, median age, and age cohort shares, accessible through data.census.gov (ACS 5-year, county geography).

Racial & Ethnic Composition

County-level racial composition (e.g., White, Black or African American, American Indian and Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, Some Other Race, Two or More Races) and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity are reported by the U.S. Census Bureau in decennial census and ACS products. These breakdowns are available through data.census.gov using Phillips County, Kansas as the geography.

Household & Housing Data

County-level household and housing indicators—such as number of households, average household size, owner-occupied vs. renter-occupied housing, vacancy rates, and housing unit counts—are published in the ACS 5-year estimates and decennial census housing tabulations. These measures are available through the U.S. Census Bureau data portal under Phillips County, Kansas.

Source Notes

  • The most commonly used single source for a consolidated county demographic profile is the U.S. Census Bureau’s ACS 5-year “Data Profiles” and “Detailed Tables” on data.census.gov.
  • This response does not include numeric values because the request requires exact county-level statistics, and no specific Census reference year (e.g., 2020 decennial census; 2022 or 2023 ACS 5-year) was specified.

Email Usage

Phillips County, Kansas is a sparsely populated High Plains county where long distances between communities and a large rural service area tend to increase reliance on remote communication, while also raising the per‑household cost of broadband infrastructure. Direct, county-level email usage statistics are generally not published; email adoption is commonly proxied using household internet/broadband subscription and computer availability from the U.S. Census Bureau (data.census.gov) and related programs.

Digital access indicators (proxies for email access)

County patterns are best inferred from: (1) household broadband subscription, (2) any internet subscription, and (3) computer (desktop/laptop/tablet) availability reported in Census/ACS tables on data.census.gov. Lower broadband subscription and lower computer access typically correspond to reduced routine email use, especially for job search, telehealth, and school communications.

Age and gender distribution

Older age shares—available via the county profile in the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts—are associated nationally with lower home broadband adoption and less frequent email use. Gender distribution is not a primary driver of email access compared with age and connectivity.

Connectivity and infrastructure limitations

Rural terrain and low density can limit provider competition and last‑mile coverage; service footprints can be reviewed via the FCC National Broadband Map.

Mobile Phone Usage

Phillips County is in north-central Kansas along the Nebraska border, with Phillipsburg as the county seat. The county is predominantly rural, with low population density and an economy shaped by agriculture and small towns. Terrain is generally flat to gently rolling plains. These characteristics tend to reduce the economic efficiency of dense cellular site placement compared with urban Kansas counties, which can affect coverage depth, indoor signal strength, and the pace of newer-generation deployment.

Key measurement limits and how this overview separates concepts

County-specific statistics that directly measure mobile phone “penetration” (device ownership) or mobile-only internet reliance are often reported at broader geographies (state, multi-county regions) or through subscription datasets not routinely published at the county level. This overview distinguishes:

  • Network availability (supply-side): whether 4G/5G service is reported as available in locations across the county.
  • Household adoption and usage (demand-side): whether residents subscribe to mobile service, own smartphones, and use mobile data as a primary or supplemental connection.

Where Phillips County–specific adoption measures are not available in standard public tables, the limitation is stated explicitly.

Network availability (coverage and technology presence)

FCC-reported mobile broadband availability

The most consistently used public source for mobile availability is the FCC’s Broadband Data Collection (BDC). It provides location-based reporting of where providers claim service availability by technology (including mobile) and advertised speed tiers. These data are best used to describe reported availability, not actual experienced performance.

  • The FCC’s BDC platform can be used to view reported mobile broadband coverage layers and provider presence in Phillips County through the FCC’s mapping interface and downloadable datasets: FCC National Broadband Map (BDC).
  • FCC coverage reporting is subject to methodological limitations (provider-reported availability, modeling assumptions, and challenges in validating signal quality indoors or in vehicle use). The FCC documents the framework and data program under: FCC Broadband Data Collection program.

4G LTE and 5G availability patterns (county-level precision limits)

Public, county-specific summaries that quantify “percent of population covered by 4G/5G” are not consistently published as definitive metrics. Instead, availability is typically inferred from:

  • FCC BDC availability layers (mobile broadband coverage by provider/technology).
  • Provider coverage maps (not standardized and not always comparable across carriers).

In rural Kansas counties such as Phillips, reported 4G LTE availability is generally widespread along highways and population centers, while 5G availability—especially higher-bandwidth mid-band and mmWave—is more variable and often concentrated near towns and major corridors. Precise, Phillips County–only statements about the extent of 5G coverage require direct reference to the FCC BDC map layers for the county rather than generalized statewide patterns.

Household adoption and mobile access indicators (demand-side)

What is available at county level

Direct county-level “mobile phone ownership” measures are not a standard standalone U.S. Census Bureau table. However, several related adoption indicators are available at county level via the American Community Survey (ACS), which can contextualize mobile use:

  • Households with a broadband internet subscription (any type) and, in some tables, distinctions among subscription types. These measures are useful for understanding overall connectivity adoption but do not isolate mobile-only use reliably at county scale in all releases.
  • Computer and internet access indicators (device presence such as desktop/laptop/tablet) help frame reliance on mobile devices, but they do not directly count smartphones.

County tables can be accessed through the Census Bureau’s primary portals:

Limitation: ACS internet subscription tables are not a direct “mobile penetration” measure and may not fully capture smartphone-only households or mobile data plan reliance at a county level with high precision, especially in smaller rural counties where sampling error can be larger.

Kansas and regional context sources for adoption

Kansas broadband planning materials and statewide assessments sometimes discuss adoption barriers (cost, digital skills, device access) that affect rural counties, but they may not publish Phillips County–specific mobile adoption rates. For statewide and planning context:

Mobile internet usage patterns (how residents typically use mobile connectivity)

4G LTE as baseline mobile broadband

In rural counties, 4G LTE commonly functions as:

  • A primary mobile data layer for smartphones and in-vehicle connectivity.
  • A fallback connection where fixed broadband options are limited or where service quality varies by location.
  • A complement to fixed wireless, cable, or fiber where available in town centers.

County-level, public quantitative measures of “share of residents using 4G vs 5G” are not typically published. Usage pattern evidence is generally derived from carrier analytics or third-party measurement firms, which are not consistently available as public county tables.

5G usage

Where 5G is available, usage typically depends on:

  • Device ownership of 5G-capable smartphones.
  • Whether 5G coverage is present in the specific locations where people live, work, and travel.
  • Backhaul capacity and network loading, which affect realized speeds.

Limitation: Without a published Phillips County–specific dataset, the proportion of traffic carried on 5G versus LTE cannot be stated definitively.

Common device types (smartphones vs other devices)

Smartphones as the dominant mobile device class (county-level quantification limits)

Nationally and statewide, smartphones represent the primary mobile access device, but a precise Phillips County breakdown (smartphone vs basic phone vs hotspot-only) is not typically available in public county tables.

Relevant proxy indicators:

  • ACS computer device categories (desktop/laptop/tablet) inform whether households have alternatives to mobile devices, but they do not count smartphones directly.
  • Overall internet subscription rates provide context for whether mobile service is likely supplementing or substituting fixed broadband.

For county-level device and internet access proxies, the most direct public source remains:

Other connected devices

In rural settings, additional device types commonly used with mobile networks include:

  • Dedicated hotspots (mobile routers)
  • Cellular-connected tablets
  • Farm and field telemetry/IoT devices (where coverage supports it)

Limitation: Public, county-level counts of these device types are generally unavailable; most detailed figures are held by carriers or industry datasets.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage in Phillips County

Rural settlement pattern and distance

  • Dispersed housing and long distances between towns reduce the density of users per square mile, influencing tower spacing and coverage depth.
  • Coverage quality can differ significantly between town centers, highways, and remote areas.

These patterns can be evaluated using county geography and settlement data from:

Income, age, and household characteristics (adoption-side influences)

  • ACS demographic profiles (age distribution, household income, disability status, and education) are commonly used to contextualize broadband adoption and device reliance.
  • Rural counties often show higher variability in adoption measures due to smaller sample sizes in survey data.

County demographic context is available through:

Transportation corridors and coverage concentration

  • Mobile network performance and reported availability often concentrate along state and federal highways and around Phillipsburg and other population clusters.
  • Reported availability should be validated against the FCC BDC map at the location level for accurate within-county differentiation.

Primary source for location-level availability:

Summary: availability vs adoption in Phillips County

  • Network availability: Best documented through FCC BDC location-level reporting, which can show where LTE/5G is reported as available and which providers report service in Phillips County. This describes supply-side presence, not guaranteed performance.
  • Household adoption: Public, county-level measures are strongest for general internet subscription and computer access via the ACS, which provides context but does not directly quantify smartphone ownership or mobile-only reliance with high precision for Phillips County.
  • Device mix and usage patterns: Smartphones are generally the dominant mobile access device, but Phillips County–specific device-type splits and LTE-versus-5G usage shares are not available as standard public county datasets; these are typically derived from carrier or proprietary measurement sources.

Social Media Trends

Phillips County is a rural county in north‑central Kansas along the Nebraska border, with Phillipsburg as the county seat and the largest population center. Agriculture and small‑town services are central to the local economy, and population density is low compared with Kansas metro counties. These characteristics typically correspond to heavier reliance on mobile connectivity, local-community Facebook groups, and school/sports updates for day‑to‑day information sharing.

User statistics (penetration and active use)

  • County-specific social media penetration figures are not published in major national datasets at the county level; most reliable measurement is available at national and state/regional levels rather than for Phillips County alone.
  • National benchmark (U.S. adults): About 69% of U.S. adults use at least one social media site, according to Pew Research Center’s Social Media Fact Sheet. This serves as the most cited baseline for community-level context when local measurement is unavailable.
  • Connectivity context (relevant to rural counties): Broadband availability and mobile-only access patterns can shape usage frequency and platform choice; national rural/urban differences are summarized in Pew Research Center’s internet and broadband fact sheet.

Age group trends

National survey patterns consistently show higher social media use among younger adults, with platform mix changing by age:

  • 18–29: Highest overall use; especially strong on Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube.
  • 30–49: High use; Facebook and YouTube remain prominent, with substantial Instagram use.
  • 50–64: Majority use; Facebook and YouTube dominate; Instagram usage lower than younger groups.
  • 65+: Lowest overall use, but Facebook remains the leading platform among users. Source for age-by-platform patterns: Pew Research Center social media usage (by age and platform).

Gender breakdown

  • Overall: Nationally, men and women report similar overall social media adoption, with platform-level differences more notable than “any social media” differences.
  • Platform tendencies (national): Women are more likely than men to report using Pinterest and, in many survey waves, Facebook; men often report relatively higher use of YouTube and some discussion-oriented platforms. Source: Pew Research Center platform-by-demographics tables.

Most-used platforms (percentages where available)

County-level platform shares are not published in reputable public datasets; the clearest reference points are national shares:

  • YouTube: 83% of U.S. adults
  • Facebook: 68%
  • Instagram: 47%
  • Pinterest: 35%
  • TikTok: 33%
  • LinkedIn: 30%
  • X (Twitter): 22%
  • Snapchat: 27%
  • WhatsApp: 29% These are the most widely cited current benchmarks reported by Pew Research Center (latest available in the fact sheet).

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and preferences)

  • Community information exchange skews toward Facebook in rural areas: Local news, event promotion, and school/sports updates commonly concentrate in Facebook pages and groups, reflecting Facebook’s broad age reach and group features (consistent with Facebook’s high national penetration in the Pew platform tables).
  • Video is a dominant format across ages: YouTube’s very high reach nationally (83% of adults) supports heavy use of video for how-to content, local highlights, and entertainment; this aligns with cross-age consumption patterns documented by Pew Research Center.
  • Younger adults show multi-platform behavior: Under-30 users are more likely to maintain active use across several platforms (Instagram/Snapchat/TikTok in addition to YouTube), while older adults more often concentrate activity on fewer services, especially Facebook and YouTube (documented by age splits in Pew’s demographic breakdowns).
  • Messaging and private sharing are central to engagement: National patterns show substantial use of messaging-centered apps (e.g., WhatsApp at 29% of adults) and private sharing behaviors, which often supplement public posting—particularly in smaller communities where interpersonal networks overlap (platform reach from Pew).
  • Practical utility over broadcasting: In rural counties, engagement tends to emphasize utilitarian updates (weather impacts, road conditions, community notices, buy/sell activity, and local services) rather than high-frequency influencer-style posting; this is consistent with observed uses of Facebook groups and local pages as primary information hubs (supported indirectly by Facebook’s broad demographic penetration in Pew).

Family & Associates Records

Phillips County, Kansas family-related records include vital records (birth and death certificates) and court records affecting family status. In Kansas, certified birth and death records are maintained centrally by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) Office of Vital Statistics rather than county offices; request and ordering information is provided by KDHE (Kansas Vital Records (KDHE)). Marriage licenses and some local filings may be available through the Phillips County Clerk and related county offices listed on the county site (Phillips County, Kansas (official site)).

Adoption records and other family-status matters are generally handled through the state court system, with case access governed by Kansas judicial branch policies. Phillips County court contact and local court operations are referenced through the Kansas Judicial Branch district court directory (Kansas District Courts (Kansas Judicial Branch)).

Public databases relevant to family and associates commonly include property, tax, and register of deeds records that link household members through ownership and transactions. Phillips County real estate recording functions are typically accessed via the county Register of Deeds office information on the county website (Phillips County offices and contacts).

Access occurs online through state portals (vital records) and in person or by request through county offices for land and administrative records. Privacy restrictions apply: birth certificates are restricted to eligible requestors; adoption records are generally confidential; many court and vital records have statutory access limits.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available in Phillips County, Kansas

  • Marriage licenses (and related marriage application records): Issued at the county level and recorded as part of the county’s marriage record set.
  • Divorce records: Maintained as district court case records. Commonly encountered record types include the divorce decree/journal entry of divorce, associated pleadings, and the case register/docket.
  • Annulments: Handled as district court civil case records and maintained in the same general manner as other domestic-relations cases, with final orders/judgments filed in the court record.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

Marriage records (licenses/returns)

  • Filed/recorded by: The Phillips County Clerk (marriage licenses are issued and recorded at the county clerk’s office).
  • Access:
    • County-level access is typically through the Phillips County Clerk’s records (in-person and/or by written request, depending on county procedures).
    • State-level copies: Kansas maintains marriage records through the Kansas Office of Vital Statistics (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, KDHE), which issues certified copies for eligible requesters under state rules.
      Reference: Kansas Vital Records (KDHE)

Divorce and annulment court records

  • Filed/maintained by: The Clerk of the District Court for the county where the case was filed (Phillips County District Court). These are court case files rather than vital records.
  • Access:
    • Court file access is generally through the district court clerk (in-person and/or by records request), subject to Kansas court access rules and sealing/confidentiality provisions.
    • Electronic access may be available for some case information through the Kansas Judicial Branch’s public access systems, subject to limitations for domestic cases and protected data.
      Reference: Kansas Judicial Branch

Typical information included in these records

Marriage license/record

Common data elements include:

  • Full names of spouses (including prior names, as recorded)
  • Date and place of marriage (and/or license issuance date)
  • Ages or dates of birth (varies by form/era)
  • Residences at time of application
  • Parents’ names (often included on applications; content varies by time period)
  • Officiant name and officiant credentials/title
  • Witnesses (when required by the form used)
  • License number and filing/recording details

Divorce decree / final order (district court)

Common data elements include:

  • Names of parties; case caption and case number
  • Filing date and date the divorce was granted (journal entry/decree date)
  • Findings on jurisdiction/venue and grounds (as reflected in pleadings/orders)
  • Orders on:
    • Property and debt division
    • Spousal maintenance (alimony), if ordered
    • Child custody/legal decision-making and parenting time
    • Child support and health insurance provisions
    • Name restoration (when requested and granted)
  • Any incorporated settlement agreement terms (when applicable)

Annulment orders

Common data elements include:

  • Names of parties; case caption and case number
  • Date of judgment/order
  • Legal basis for annulment as stated in the pleadings and findings
  • Orders addressing status, fees/costs, and (when applicable) custody/support/property issues

Privacy and legal restrictions

  • Marriage records: Marriage records are generally treated as vital records. Kansas restricts issuance of certified copies to eligible requesters under state vital records rules. Non-certified/informational access practices can vary by custodian and record format.
  • Divorce and annulment court files: Court records are governed by Kansas Supreme Court rules and statutes on public access and confidentiality. Domestic-relations filings can contain protected or redacted information (such as Social Security numbers, minor children’s information, and other confidential identifiers).
  • Sealed/expunged/protected records: Some documents or entire case files may be sealed or subject to restricted access by court order. When sealed, public access is not available except as authorized by the court.

Education, Employment and Housing

Phillips County is a rural county in north‑central Kansas along the Nebraska border, with Phillipsburg as the county seat and largest community. The county’s population is small and widely dispersed across farms, small towns, and unincorporated areas, with services and employment concentrated in Phillipsburg and a few smaller communities. (General context is consistent across standard federal and state profiles such as the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts profile for Phillips County.)

Education Indicators

Public schools (number and names)

  • District structure: Public K–12 education is primarily provided by USD 325 (Phillipsburg), which serves most of the county.
  • Schools: USD 325 commonly reports the following schools serving the district:
    • Phillipsburg Elementary School
    • Phillipsburg Middle School
    • Phillipsburg High School
      (School naming and campus configuration are best verified directly through the district directory: USD 325 Phillipsburg.)
  • Other public education options: Some households near county edges may attend districts in neighboring counties; a countywide, school-by-school count varies depending on enrollment boundaries (proxy note: the county is typically characterized as a single-district service area for most residents).

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratios: District-level ratios are published by state and federal education reporting systems, but a current county-specific value is not consistently available in one authoritative public table for Phillips County alone. As a proxy, rural Kansas districts commonly fall in the mid‑teens student‑to‑teacher range; this is not a Phillips County–specific measurement.
  • Graduation rate: Kansas graduation rates are reported by the Kansas State Department of Education (KSDE) by district and school year, but a Phillips County summary rate is not published as a single, countywide statistic. District-level reporting is available through KSDE resources (proxy note: Kansas statewide adjusted cohort graduation rates are typically in the high‑80% to low‑90% range, but this is not a district substitute). Reference: Kansas State Department of Education.

Adult educational attainment

  • High school diploma or higher; bachelor’s degree or higher: The most recent single-source, county-level adult attainment figures are typically drawn from the American Community Survey (ACS). Phillips County’s attainment profile can be read directly from:

Notable programs (STEM, CTE, AP)

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE): Kansas districts commonly participate in KSDE-supported CTE pathways (agriculture, health science, manufacturing, business, etc.), with offerings varying by district size and staffing. District-specific pathways and partner programs are documented through USD 325 and KSDE CTE materials.
  • Advanced Placement (AP) / dual credit: Small rural high schools in Kansas often provide limited AP course selection and/or rely more heavily on dual credit through regional community colleges or virtual course networks. Phillipsburg High School’s current catalog is best confirmed via USD 325 publications.

School safety measures and counseling resources

  • Safety: Kansas districts generally operate under required safety planning, including building safety protocols and coordination with local law enforcement. Specific measures (secure entry procedures, visitor management, drills, threat reporting protocols) are typically documented in district handbooks and board policies rather than in county datasets.
  • Student support: Counseling and mental health supports are commonly provided through school counselors and referrals to community providers; staffing levels and service models vary by district and are most reliably stated in district directories and handbooks (USD 325 is the primary reference).

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year available)

  • The most consistently updated official local unemployment estimates are produced by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS). Phillips County’s latest annual and monthly rates are available via:
    • BLS LAUS (Local unemployment data)
      (A single “most recent year” rate depends on the latest finalized annual average at the time of access; the BLS series is authoritative for this indicator.)

Major industries and employment sectors

  • Phillips County’s economy reflects typical rural High Plains structure with employment concentrated in:
    • Agriculture (crop and livestock) and agricultural support services
    • Public administration and education (local schools, county and city government)
    • Health care and social assistance (clinics, long‑term care, assisted living)
    • Retail trade and accommodation/food services
    • Construction and transportation/warehousing (including farm-to-market logistics)
      County and place-level industry shares are available from ACS “Industry by occupation” tables and data profiles (see: data.census.gov).

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

  • Occupational patterns in Phillips County align with:
    • Management and business/office support (small business and public sector administration)
    • Service occupations (healthcare support, food service, protective services)
    • Sales and related
    • Construction, installation/maintenance/repair
    • Production and transportation/material moving
    • Farming, fishing, and forestry (notably higher share than urban counties)
      Detailed occupation distributions are reported through ACS occupation tables on data.census.gov.

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

  • Primary mode: Personal vehicle commuting predominates; rural counties generally show high “drive alone” shares and limited public transit usage.
  • Mean commute time: The ACS publishes mean travel time to work at the county level; Phillips County’s current estimate is available in the commuting section of:

Local employment versus out‑of‑county work

  • Phillips County exhibits a common rural pattern of mixed local employment with out‑commuting for specialized jobs (regional healthcare, larger retail hubs, manufacturing, or higher‑education-related employment in nearby counties). The ACS “Place of work” and county-to-county commuting flow data provide the most direct measurement; commuting flow datasets are accessible via Census tools and related products (reference entry point: data.census.gov).
    (A precise “percent working outside the county” requires extraction from ACS commuting tables; it is not consistently summarized in a single county narrative source.)

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership rate and rental share

  • Phillips County’s owner‑occupied versus renter‑occupied split is reported through ACS housing tenure estimates, available in:

Median property values and recent trends

  • Median owner‑occupied home value: Published via ACS and displayed in QuickFacts:
  • Recent trends: County-level home values in rural Kansas have generally increased over the past decade, with variability tied to interest rates, agricultural conditions, and limited inventory in small towns. A precise Phillips County trend requires time-series ACS or market listing data; the ACS provides multi-year comparability.

Typical rent prices

  • Median gross rent: Reported in ACS and shown in:

Types of housing

  • The county’s housing stock is primarily:
    • Single‑family detached homes in Phillipsburg and smaller towns
    • Lower-density rentals (small multi‑unit buildings, duplexes, accessory units)
    • Farmhouses and rural residences on larger lots outside town limits
      ACS “Units in structure” tables quantify these shares (available via data.census.gov).

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools/amenities)

  • Phillipsburg: The most concentrated access to schools, healthcare, grocery retail, and civic amenities; typical neighborhood patterns place schools and athletic facilities within the city and within short driving distances for most residents.
  • Rural areas and small towns: Longer driving distances to schools and services are typical; day-to-day amenities are more limited, with reliance on Phillipsburg and regional hubs.

Property tax overview (rate and typical homeowner cost)

  • Tax structure: Kansas property tax bills reflect local mill levies (school district, county, city, and special districts) applied to the assessed value, with residential assessment at 11.5% of appraised value under Kansas classification rules (statewide rule).
  • Local rates and typical cost: The effective property tax rate and typical bill vary significantly by jurisdiction and levy changes. Countywide “average effective rate” is not reliably represented by a single static number on general profiles; the most authoritative references are:

Data availability note: For Phillips County, the most consistently “most recent” countywide percentages and medians for education attainment, commuting time, housing tenure, home value, and rent are published via ACS/QuickFacts, while unemployment is best sourced from BLS LAUS. District-level school metrics (student–teacher ratio, graduation rate, program lists, and safety/counseling details) are primarily maintained by USD 325 and KSDE rather than in county aggregate tables.

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Kansas