Lane County Local Demographic Profile
Lane County, Kansas — key demographics
Population size
- 1,535 (2020 Census)
- 2023 estimate: ~1,510 (Census Population Estimates Program), down modestly since 2020
Age
- Median age: ~46 years (ACS 2019–2023)
- Under 18: ~23%
- 18–64: ~51%
- 65 and over: ~26%
Gender
- Male: ~51%
- Female: ~49% (ACS 2019–2023)
Racial/ethnic composition (mutually exclusive; ACS 2019–2023)
- White, non-Hispanic: ~88%
- Hispanic or Latino (any race): ~9–10%
- Two or more races, non-Hispanic: ~2–3%
- Black, non-Hispanic: ~0–1%
- American Indian/Alaska Native, non-Hispanic: ~0–1%
- Asian, non-Hispanic: ~0–1%
- Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic: ~0%
Household data (ACS 2019–2023 unless noted)
- Households: ~690
- Average household size: ~2.2
- Family households: ~60–62% of all households
- Married-couple households: ~50% of all households
- Households with children under 18: ~23–25%
- One-person households: ~30–35%
- Housing units: ~850; owner-occupied rate: ~75–80%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau (2020 Decennial Census; 2019–2023 American Community Survey 5-year estimates; 2023 Population Estimates Program)
Email Usage in Lane County
Lane County, KS is very sparsely populated (2020 Census population 1,535 across ~718 sq mi; ~2.1 people/sq mi).
- Estimated email users: ~1,050 adults (about 90% of adults; ~68% of total residents). Basis: county age structure and national email adoption applied to rural connectivity.
- Age distribution of email users (share of users): 18–34 ≈ 19%, 35–64 ≈ 52%, 65+ ≈ 29% (older skew reflecting the county’s age mix; seniors’ email use lags but is substantial).
- Gender split of users: ≈51% male, 49% female, mirroring the county’s population.
- Digital access trends: Roughly four in five households subscribe to broadband, and the vast majority have a computer or smartphone; smartphone‑only internet access is a meaningful minority. Adoption has risen since 2018, with the largest gains among older adults and low‑density areas as service expands.
- Local density/connectivity facts: Classified as “frontier” rural by density, which raises last‑mile costs and slows upgrades. Residents rely on fixed broadband where available, with mobile data and community Wi‑Fi (e.g., libraries/schools) supplementing access in outlying areas.
These figures synthesize Census/ACS demographics and established national email-use rates to provide county‑level estimates.
Mobile Phone Usage in Lane County
Mobile phone usage in Lane County, Kansas — 2025 snapshot
Context
- Population: 1,535 (2020 Census) spread across 718 square miles; very low density and an older age profile than the Kansas average. County seat: Dighton.
User estimates (modeled from 2020 Census population, ACS device-subscription patterns for rural western Kansas, and 2023 rural smartphone adoption rates)
- Adult mobile phone users (any mobile): ≈1,140 residents
- Adult smartphone users: ≈1,000 residents
- Residents relying on a mobile connection as their primary internet access (hotspot/smartphone-as-home internet): ≈250–300 residents
- Business users (farms, small enterprises) actively employing mobile devices or hotspots for field connectivity: ≈200–250 workers
Demographic breakdown (directional differences vs Kansas)
- Age
- 18–34: high smartphone adoption (≈93–95%), roughly in line with state averages
- 35–64: slightly lower than state (≈85–90% vs ≈90–92% statewide), reflecting more outdoor/agricultural occupations with mixed device mixes (smartphone + basic/feature phones and rugged devices)
- 65+: notably lower than state (≈55–65% vs ≈70% statewide), driven by the county’s older age structure and conservative upgrade cycles
- Income/education
- Ownership rates are strong but there is a higher share of budget/prepaid plans and longer device replacement cycles than the Kansas average
- Household connectivity pattern
- Higher incidence of mobile-reliant households (smartphone/hotspot as primary internet) and lower fiber/cable availability than statewide norms; bundled fixed broadband + mobile adoption is lower than in metro Kansas
Digital infrastructure points
- Networks present: AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon operate countywide; coverage is strongest in and around Dighton, along US-96 and KS-23, and near other primary corridors
- 5G availability: Predominantly low-band 5G with wide geographic coverage but modest capacity; mid-band 5G capacity is sparse compared with urban Kansas, so peak speeds are typically lower and more variable
- LTE fallback: Extensive LTE footprint underpins service continuity; signal variability increases on section roads between highways and in low-lying terrain
- Capacity/backhaul: Many rural sites rely on microwave backhaul or limited-capacity fiber, constraining 5G throughput compared with Kansas metro areas; this drives heavier reliance on LTE and contributes to evening slowdowns
- Emergency/public safety: E-911 cellular location and text-to-911 coverage are supported; FirstNet coverage is available via AT&T, commonly leveraged by county public safety
- Competitive landscape for home connectivity: Scarcer wired cable/fiber options than the state average and broader availability of fixed wireless access (FWA) from mobile carriers; this raises the role of mobile networks in home internet substitution
How Lane County differs from Kansas overall
- Higher mobile-as-primary-internet reliance: A noticeably larger share of residents and small businesses depend on smartphones/hotspots or FWA for home/field connectivity than the state average
- Slightly lower smartphone penetration among older adults: The county’s older age mix reduces overall smartphone share relative to Kansas, even as younger cohorts are on par with state norms
- Network capacity constraints, not coverage gaps, are the main limitation: Geographic coverage is generally adequate, but limited mid-band 5G and constrained backhaul keep median speeds below state urban benchmarks and produce more pronounced peak-hour slowdowns
- Device and plan mix skews value-oriented: Greater prevalence of prepaid and longer upgrade cycles than statewide, reflecting rural income/price sensitivity and fewer in-market retail options
Implications
- Expect stable overall mobile ownership but slower growth in advanced 5G usage than Kansas metros until additional mid-band capacity and fiber-fed sites are added
- Mobile networks will continue to shoulder a higher share of home broadband demand, sustaining strong uptake of hotspots and FWA offerings
- Targeted improvements—mid-band 5G overlays, added sectors on existing towers, and fiber backhaul upgrades—would yield outsized benefits compared with blanket new coverage deployments
Social Media Trends in Lane County
Lane County, Kansas — social media usage snapshot (2025)
How this was built: County-aligned estimates using the 2020 Census (population 1,562; adult 18+ population ≈ 1,200–1,250) combined with recent Pew Research Center findings for U.S. adults, with rural adjustments. Figures below reflect share of Lane County adults unless noted.
Overall user stats
- Adults using at least one social platform: 65–75% (≈800–930 people)
- Daily users: ~50–60% of adults; weekly-but-not-daily: ~10–15%
- Access is overwhelmingly mobile-first (>85% of users primarily on smartphones)
Most-used platforms (share of adults)
- YouTube: 75–80%
- Facebook: 60–70%
- Instagram: 30–40%
- TikTok: 20–25%
- Snapchat: 20–25%
- Pinterest: 30–35%
- X (Twitter): 15–20%
- Reddit: 5–10%
- WhatsApp: 10–15% Notes: Facebook and YouTube dominate across ages; TikTok/Snapchat skew young; Pinterest over-indexes among women; X and Reddit over-index among men.
Age-group usage patterns
- Teens (13–17): 85–95% on Snapchat/TikTok; heavy YouTube; light Facebook (mainly for events/school updates)
- 18–29: Near-universal YouTube; 70–85% Instagram/Snapchat; 50–65% TikTok; Facebook secondary
- 30–49: 65–75% Facebook (Groups, Marketplace, Messenger); 50–60% Instagram; strong YouTube for how-to/news
- 50–64: 60–70% Facebook primary; 60–70% YouTube; 25–35% Pinterest; limited TikTok/Instagram
- 65+: 55–65% Facebook; 55–65% YouTube; minimal on other platforms
Gender breakdown (directional, among users)
- Facebook: ~55–60% women, ~40–45% men
- Instagram: ~55–60% women, ~40–45% men
- Pinterest: ~70–75% women, ~25–30% men
- YouTube: ~50–55% men, ~45–50% women
- X (Twitter): ~55–65% men, ~35–45% women
- Reddit: ~65–75% men, ~25–35% women
- TikTok/Snapchat: close to even overall; slight female tilt among adults
Behavioral trends observed in rural Great Plains communities of similar size (applies to Lane County)
- Community coordination lives on Facebook: heavy use of Groups for school sports, churches, county updates, road/weather alerts, and event organizing; Marketplace is a key local buy/sell channel (farm/ranch gear, vehicles, household goods)
- Video-first consumption: YouTube for repairs, ag/ranch content, product research, sermons/meetings; short-form video (Reels/TikTok) dominates under 35 for entertainment and local highlights
- Private-by-default messaging: Facebook Messenger and Snapchat are primary chat tools; WhatsApp is niche and used mainly for family or work chains that span outside the county
- Posting vs. lurking: Older users post less but engage via comments/shares on Facebook; younger users create in Stories/Snaps but post fewer permanent feed items
- Time-of-day peaks: early morning (6–8 a.m.), lunch (noon), and evening (7–10 p.m.); weekend spikes around high school sports, fairs, and church/community events
- Trust and reach: Local pages/groups and known individuals outperform national sources for engagement; photo/video of recognizable people/places drives the highest interaction
- Ads and outreach: Best ROI via Facebook/Instagram with tight geo-targeting (10–30 miles) and creative tailored to events, seasonal needs, and practical offers; video or image posts featuring local scenes markedly outperform stock content
Key takeaways
- Plan around Facebook + YouTube for countywide reach, add Instagram for 18–49, and TikTok/Snapchat for under-30 engagement
- Use Groups, Events, and Marketplace for organic reach; short-form video boosts discovery across all ages
- Message responsiveness matters: many interactions move quickly into Messenger/Snapchat DMs for questions and conversions
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Kansas
- Allen
- Anderson
- Atchison
- Barber
- Barton
- Bourbon
- Brown
- Butler
- Chase
- Chautauqua
- Cherokee
- Cheyenne
- Clark
- Clay
- Cloud
- Coffey
- Comanche
- Cowley
- Crawford
- Decatur
- Dickinson
- Doniphan
- Douglas
- Edwards
- Elk
- Ellis
- Ellsworth
- Finney
- Ford
- Franklin
- Geary
- Gove
- Graham
- Grant
- Gray
- Greeley
- Greenwood
- Hamilton
- Harper
- Harvey
- Haskell
- Hodgeman
- Jackson
- Jefferson
- Jewell
- Johnson
- Kearny
- Kingman
- Kiowa
- Labette
- Leavenworth
- Lincoln
- Linn
- Logan
- Lyon
- Marion
- Marshall
- Mcpherson
- Meade
- Miami
- Mitchell
- Montgomery
- Morris
- Morton
- Nemaha
- Neosho
- Ness
- Norton
- Osage
- Osborne
- Ottawa
- Pawnee
- Phillips
- Pottawatomie
- Pratt
- Rawlins
- Reno
- Republic
- Rice
- Riley
- Rooks
- Rush
- Russell
- Saline
- Scott
- Sedgwick
- Seward
- Shawnee
- Sheridan
- Sherman
- Smith
- Stafford
- Stanton
- Stevens
- Sumner
- Thomas
- Trego
- Wabaunsee
- Wallace
- Washington
- Wichita
- Wilson
- Woodson
- Wyandotte