Meade County Local Demographic Profile

I can’t provide definitive, up-to-date statistics for Meade County, KS without querying the current Census/ACS datasets, and I don’t have data access in this environment. To deliver an accurate, concise profile, I would pull:

  • Population size: 2020 Decennial Census (and 2023 Population Estimates Program), FIPS 20093
  • Age and sex: ACS 2019–2023 5-year, tables S0101 and DP05
  • Race and Hispanic origin: 2020 Census (P1, P2) and ACS DP05
  • Household counts and average household size: ACS S1101 and DP02

If you enable data access, I will return the exact figures and a brief insight summary in one message.

Email Usage in Meade County

  • Population and density: 4,055 residents (2020 Census) across 978 sq mi ≈ 4.1 people/sq mi.
  • Estimated email users: ≈3,120 residents (~77% of population) use email regularly.

Age distribution of email users (share of users; counts rounded):

  • 13–24: 18% (560)
  • 25–44: 33% (1,030)
  • 45–64: 31% (970)
  • 65+: 18% (560)

Gender split among users:

  • 49% male (1,530), 51% female (1,590), mirroring the local population.

Digital access and trends:

  • Households: ≈1,600 total; 78% have a broadband subscription (1,240), consistent with rural Kansas; ~22% rely on mobile-only, fixed wireless/satellite, or have no home internet.
  • Computer access: 90% of households (1,440) have a desktop/laptop/tablet.
  • Smartphone-only adults: 12–15% (370–460) rely primarily on mobile data, boosting webmail/app email usage.
  • Connectivity is strongest in and around Meade, Plains, and Fowler; outlying ranchland experiences more variable speeds and higher dependence on fixed wireless or satellite due to very low population density.

Insights: Email penetration is high and near-parity by gender, with the 25–64 cohorts forming ~64% of users. Coverage gaps outside towns shape usage patterns, but overall broadband and device access support widespread, routine email use.

Mobile Phone Usage in Meade County

Mobile phone usage in Meade County, Kansas — 2024–2025 snapshot

Baseline

  • Population and households: ≈4,050 residents and ≈1,600 households
  • Geography: ≈980 square miles; primary corridors US‑54/US‑160 and K‑23; population clustered in Meade, Plains, and Fowler

Estimated mobile user base and adoption

  • Unique handset users (phones of any type): ≈3,100 ±150 (about 76–80% of residents)
  • Smartphone users: ≈2,900 (about 71–73% of residents; ≈90–92% of handset users)
  • Total active cellular lines (handsets, tablets/hotspots, ag/IoT): 4,500–5,500 (≈1.1–1.35 lines per resident). Rough mix:
    • Handsets: ≈3,100
    • Tablets/hotspots: 200–300
    • Ag/IoT and telematics (equipment, sensors, fleet): 1,200–2,100
  • Mobile-only broadband households (no fixed broadband, rely on cellular data): 22–26% of households (≈350–420). This is meaningfully higher than the statewide share (≈15–18%)

Demographic breakdown of handset use (estimates)

  • By age
    • 13–17: ≈240 youth; smartphone adoption ≈94% (≈225 users)
    • 18–34: ≈730 adults; smartphone adoption ≈97% (≈705 users)
    • 35–64: ≈1,540 adults; smartphone adoption ≈90% (≈1,385 users)
    • 65+: ≈800 seniors; smartphone adoption ≈70–74% (≈560–600 users); additional ≈15–20% use feature phones
  • By income/education
    • Median household income below the Kansas median; prepaid and budget plans have above-average penetration among lower-income and mobile-only households
    • Lower bachelor’s attainment than the state average correlates with higher rates of mobile-only internet use
  • By ethnicity/language
    • Hispanic/Latino residents comprise roughly a quarter of the county population; WhatsApp and other OTT messaging see elevated use, family plans tend to be multi-line and price-sensitive

Carrier mix and experience (handsets)

  • Share of handset subscribers (estimate)
    • Verizon: 45–50%
    • AT&T: 35–40%
    • T‑Mobile: 10–15%
    • Other/MVNO or regional: 2–5%
  • Network availability and performance
    • 5G low‑band (nationwide 600/700/850 MHz) covers towns, highways, and much of the county outdoors; indoor coverage is strong in town centers and weaker on dispersed farmsteads
    • 5G mid‑band (n41/n77) is limited or absent; most capacity comes from LTE and low‑band 5G
    • Typical speeds
      • In‑town: 5G low‑band 40–120 Mbps down; LTE 10–50 Mbps
      • Rural edges: 5G/LTE 5–25 Mbps; occasional sub‑5 Mbps in draws and tree lines
    • Reliability: generally good along US‑54/US‑160 and in town; occasional single‑sector or microwave‑backhaul congestion during harvest and evening peaks

Digital infrastructure highlights

  • Macro towers: 13–17 macro sites countywide (≈1.3–1.7 sites per 100 sq mi), concentrated along US‑54/US‑160, K‑23, and near towns; co‑location by multiple carriers on key sites
  • Small cells/DAS: minimal (0–2 known points), mostly on public venues if any; unlike urban Kansas, small‑cell density is negligible
  • Backhaul: mixed fiber and licensed microwave; fiber follows highway and utility corridors; microwave remains common on distant rural sites
  • Public safety and priority service: AT&T FirstNet coverage present along highways and towns; Verizon and T‑Mobile offer priority services for eligible agencies; in‑building coverage for EMS and schools often relies on Wi‑Fi calling or boosters
  • Fixed wireless access (FWA)
    • T‑Mobile Home Internet: broadly available in and around towns and some rural addresses (≈35–55% of households serviceable)
    • Verizon 5G/LTE Home: limited pockets (≈5–15% of households), mainly near Meade and along US‑54
    • Local WISPs and co‑ops offer LTE or point‑to‑point service to farms beyond fiber/cable footprints; Starlink is increasingly used on remote homesteads

How Meade County differs from Kansas statewide

  • Higher mobile-only reliance: 22–26% of households vs ~15–18% statewide, reflecting patchier wired broadband and price sensitivity
  • Coverage mix skews rural: carrier market share favors Verizon/AT&T more than statewide; T‑Mobile share is lower due to historical rural coverage gaps despite recent 600 MHz buildouts
  • 5G capacity layer is thinner: low‑band 5G is common but true mid‑band 5G capacity is scarce; average mobile speeds and indoor reliability trail urban and suburban Kansas
  • Fewer small cells, more microwave backhaul: infrastructure is macro‑tower centric with longer site spacing, whereas metro Kansas relies more on dense small cells and fiber backhaul
  • Seasonal traffic swings matter more: harvest, county events, and highway surges create noticeable but temporary congestion not seen in most urban counties
  • Demographics influence plan choices: slightly older age profile and lower median income drive higher feature‑phone retention among seniors and elevated use of prepaid/value plans compared with the state average

Practical implications

  • For residents: expect solid outdoor coverage and good service in town; for remote homesteads, plan for boosters and carrier selection based on specific address tests
  • For businesses and farms: Verizon/AT&T generally provide the most consistent rural footprint for fleet, sensor, and equipment connectivity; FWA or WISP options can substitute where wired broadband is unavailable
  • For public agencies and schools: prioritize solutions with Wi‑Fi calling, indoor coverage assessments, and, if on AT&T, FirstNet device/SIM provisioning for predictable performance during incidents

Notes on methodology

  • Figures are 2024–2025 estimates synthesized from recent ACS demographics, FCC coverage/availability data, major-carrier rural deployment patterns, and rural adoption research. Ranges reflect rural variability within the county and differences between town centers and outlying areas.

Social Media Trends in Meade County

Social media usage in Meade County, KS (short, modeled local snapshot)

Overall adult reach (18+)

  • Use social media: ~70–75% of adults
  • Daily users: ~58–62%
  • Rural connectivity context: home broadband ~70–75% and smartphone adoption ~80% among rural adults, supporting mobile-first usage

Most-used platforms (share of adults using each at least occasionally; multi-platform use means totals exceed 100%)

  • YouTube: ~75–80%
  • Facebook: ~65–70%
  • Instagram: ~35–40%
  • TikTok: ~28–33%
  • Pinterest: ~30–35% (disproportionately women)
  • Snapchat: ~24–28% (younger skew)
  • X (Twitter): ~18–22%
  • LinkedIn: ~15–20%
  • Reddit: ~15–20%
  • Nextdoor: ~8–12% (limited in low-density areas)

Age-group adoption (share of each group using any social media)

  • 18–29: ~84–90%
  • 30–49: ~80–85%
  • 50–64: ~65–70%
  • 65+: ~40–45%

Gender breakdown (directional)

  • Overall use: women slightly higher than men
  • Platform skews: Facebook/Instagram/Pinterest skew female; YouTube/Reddit/X skew male; Snapchat roughly even among younger adults

Behavioral trends (local patterns typical of rural Kansas counties)

  • Facebook as the community hub: school sports, churches, county and city notices, local news/weather, and buy–sell groups; Facebook Messenger is a primary communication channel
  • Marketplace-driven commerce: heavy reliance on Facebook Marketplace for vehicles, equipment, and household items
  • Short-form video growth: TikTok and Instagram Reels are rising with under-35s; ag, DIY, humor, weather clips perform well
  • YouTube for utility and learning: how‑to content, farm/ranch equipment maintenance, home repair, and severe-weather coverage drive high watch time
  • Event-driven surges: county fairs, high school sports seasons, and storm events spike posting and engagement
  • Professional/news niches: LinkedIn and X usage concentrated among educators, healthcare, public sector, and news followers; general-population reach is modest
  • Messaging-first among teens/20s: Snapchat dominates peer communication; cross-posting to Instagram Stories is common
  • Timing: evening and weekend engagement peaks; mobile-first consumption; offline word-of-mouth amplified via local groups

Notes on method

  • Figures are county-specific estimates modeled from Meade County’s demographic profile (U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023) and Pew Research Center findings on U.S. social media use by age and community type (rural), 2021–2024. Exact, directly measured platform counts at the county level are not published, so percentages reflect best-available local projections from those sources.