Jackson County Local Demographic Profile
Key demographics for Jackson County, Arkansas (most recent ACS 2019–2023 5-year estimates unless noted):
Population
- Total population: ~16,900
- Population density: ~29 per sq. mile
Age
- Median age: ~40.7 years
- Under 18: ~21%
- 18 to 64: ~58%
- 65 and over: ~21%
Gender
- Female: ~49%
- Male: ~51%
Race and ethnicity
- White (non-Hispanic): ~72%
- Black or African American (non-Hispanic): ~20%
- Hispanic or Latino (any race): ~4–5%
- Two or more races: ~3%
- Other races (including American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander): ~1–2% combined
Households
- Total households: ~6,400
- Average household size: ~2.4
- Family households: ~62%
- Married-couple families: ~42% of households
- Households with children under 18: ~27%
- Nonfamily households: ~38% (about one-third are individuals living alone)
- Homeownership rate: ~65–67%
- Median household income: ~$45,000
- Households with broadband internet: ~80%
Notes
- Figures rounded for clarity; based on U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2019–2023 5-year estimates and the 2020 Census for baseline population composition.
Email Usage in Jackson County
Jackson County, AR email landscape (estimates, 2025):
- Estimated users: ≈12,300 adult email users. Basis: ≈17,000 residents, ≈77% adults, and ≈92% of U.S. adults use email regularly.
- Age distribution of users: 18–34 ≈27%; 35–54 ≈33%; 55–64 ≈18%; 65+ ≈22%. Usage is near‑universal among 18–49, high for 50–64, and somewhat lower but widespread for 65+.
- Gender split: ≈51% female, 49% male among email users, reflecting near‑parity usage by gender.
- Digital access and habits:
- Home broadband adoption ≈76–80% of households; ≈10–12% report no home internet.
- Smartphone‑only internet users ≈15–20%.
- Daily email checking is the norm for a large majority of users.
- Local density/connectivity facts:
- Low‑density rural county (≈27–30 people per sq. mile) with connectivity concentrated in and around Newport, Tuckerman, and Diaz.
- Fiber builds are expanding in Newport/US‑67 corridors; many outer tracts still rely on legacy DSL/copper or fixed wireless, with satellite as a fallback. These gaps keep some areas below 100/20 Mbps and contribute to lower adoption outside population centers.
Overall: robust email penetration, with rural infrastructure shaping speeds and home access.
Mobile Phone Usage in Jackson County
Mobile phone usage in Jackson County, Arkansas — 2024 snapshot
User estimates (people and households)
- Total mobile phone users (any type): approximately 12,800–13,700 residents, out of a county population just under 17,000
- Smartphone users: roughly 11,800–12,400 residents
- Smartphone-dependent/mobile-only home internet households (use a cellular plan at home and no fixed broadband): about 1,500–1,800 households (roughly 22–27% of households)
How these estimates were derived
- Counts are based on 2018–2022 ACS 5-year population and household totals for Jackson County, combined with current national/regional adoption rates by age (Pew and NHIS) and rural/rural-South adjustments. The “mobile-only” household share is inferred from ACS S2801 patterns for rural Arkansas counties with similar income and age profiles.
Demographic breakdown and patterns
- Age
- 18–34: Near-universal smartphone use (≈93–97%), driving high social/video and app-based usage.
- 35–64: High adoption (≈85–90%); heavy reliance for work comms, navigation, and messaging.
- 65+: Lower adoption (≈60–70%) but rising; many in this group use basic phones or rely on family plans. This older share is slightly larger than the state average, pulling overall county smartphone penetration a bit below Arkansas as a whole.
- Income and plan type
- Lower median incomes and higher poverty rates than the state average correlate with more prepaid and MVNO plans and a higher rate of smartphone-dependent households. Jackson County’s mobile-only share is several points higher than the Arkansas average (statewide is closer to the high teens).
- Race/ethnicity
- Consistent with state patterns, Black and Hispanic residents are more likely than White residents to be smartphone-dependent for home internet access, reflecting price sensitivity and limited fixed-broadband options in specific neighborhoods.
Digital infrastructure highlights
- Coverage and technology mix
- 4G LTE is broadly available across population centers and along US-67/US-167; signal quality drops in low-density agricultural areas and river bottoms near the White River.
- 5G low-band covers the Newport area and major corridors; mid-band 5G capacity is concentrated in and near Newport and along US-67, with rural interior zones still falling back to LTE.
- Performance expectations (typical, not peak)
- LTE: roughly 5–35 Mbps down in rural zones; higher in town centers.
- 5G mid-band (where available): often 100–300 Mbps near sites but attenuates quickly with distance/vegetation; indoor performance varies in older buildings.
- Competitive landscape
- All three national carriers serve the county. AT&T and Verizon tend to offer the most consistent rural coverage; T-Mobile’s fastest 5G is strongest in town and along highways. Fixed-wireless home internet via 4G/5G is available in and around Newport and is a key option for households without cable/fiber.
- Resilience gaps
- Single-pole power feeds and river-adjacent sites can prolong outage recovery after storms. Backup-power runtimes at rural cell sites limit connectivity during extended outages, increasing dependence on car charging and public charging points.
How Jackson County differs from Arkansas statewide
- Higher smartphone dependence for home internet: Jackson County’s mobile-only household share (≈22–27%) sits a few percentage points above the state average, reflecting fewer affordable fixed-broadband options in outlying areas.
- Slightly lower overall smartphone penetration: An older age profile and lower incomes depress countywide smartphone ownership by a couple of points versus Arkansas overall, despite near-universal adoption among younger adults.
- Greater prepaid/MVNO usage: Price sensitivity and intermittent employment lead to higher churn and more prepaid plans than the state average.
- More pronounced urban–rural performance gap: In-town 5G can be fast, but just a few miles out, users more often fall back to LTE with lower and more variable speeds than typical statewide medians.
Implications
- Mobile networks are the primary on-ramp to the internet for a substantial share of households, so capacity upgrades on corridors and additional rural sectors will deliver outsized benefits.
- Programs that pair low-cost plans/devices with digital literacy for older adults would meaningfully raise adoption.
- Fixed-wireless 5G and expanded mid-band coverage near clusters outside Newport can reduce the county’s mobile-only dependency and ease network congestion during peak hours.
Social Media Trends in Jackson County
Jackson County, Arkansas — Social Media Usage (2025 snapshot)
Scope note: There are no official, platform-reported metrics at the county level. Figures below are 2025 modeled local estimates derived from Pew Research Center’s 2023–2024 U.S. social media data, county age/education/urbanicity mix from the U.S. Census Bureau (ACS 2018–2022), and broadband availability/adoption patterns from FCC and ACS. They represent best-available point estimates for adults (18+).
Headline reach
- Adults using any social media: 69%
- Household broadband subscription: ~78%
- Adult smartphone ownership: ~82%
Most-used platforms (share of all adults, 18+)
- YouTube: 74%
- Facebook: 66%
- Instagram: 34%
- TikTok: 28%
- Snapchat: 21%
- Pinterest: 20%
- X (Twitter): 14%
- LinkedIn: 11%
- Nextdoor: 5%
Age breakdown (share of each age group using any social media)
- 18–29: 92% (heavy YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat; Facebook used but less posted to)
- 30–49: 84% (Facebook and YouTube dominant; Instagram/TikTok growing)
- 50–64: 63% (Facebook first; YouTube for how‑to, news, entertainment)
- 65+: 39% (Facebook primary; some YouTube; minimal on other platforms)
Gender breakdown (share of adults using any social media)
- Women: 72% (over-index on Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest)
- Men: 66% (over-index on YouTube, X)
Behavioral trends
- Facebook is the community backbone: local news, school and church updates, civic and sports groups, and Marketplace dominate engagement.
- Video is the growth format: short-form clips via Reels and TikTok are increasingly cross-posted into Facebook Groups; YouTube watch time is rising on connected TVs.
- Messaging > public posting: high reliance on Messenger/Instagram DMs for local business inquiries, service quotes, and event coordination.
- Younger users fragment: 18–29s split time between Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat; they consume Facebook passively, post less frequently, and prefer ephemeral or DM-first sharing.
- Older users consolidate: 50+ concentrate on Facebook; they follow local institutions and rely on group recommendations; lower adoption of new platforms.
- Commerce is local-first: Facebook Marketplace and “buy/sell/trade” groups see outsized activity relative to population, with weekend and evening peaks.
- Peak usage windows: weeknights 7–10 pm CT and weekend late mornings/early afternoons show the highest local activity and response rates.
Source and method summary
- Modeled from Pew Research Center social platform adoption (2023–2024), adjusted by Jackson County’s age/education/urbanicity mix (U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2018–2022) and regional broadband/smartphone adoption (FCC and ACS). Percentages are point estimates for adults and may vary by ±3–5 percentage points in small-population cohorts.
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Arkansas
- Arkansas
- Ashley
- Baxter
- Benton
- Boone
- Bradley
- Calhoun
- Carroll
- Chicot
- Clark
- Clay
- Cleburne
- Cleveland
- Columbia
- Conway
- Craighead
- Crawford
- Crittenden
- Cross
- Dallas
- Desha
- Drew
- Faulkner
- Franklin
- Fulton
- Garland
- Grant
- Greene
- Hempstead
- Hot Spring
- Howard
- Independence
- Izard
- Jefferson
- Johnson
- Lafayette
- Lawrence
- Lee
- Lincoln
- Little River
- Logan
- Lonoke
- Madison
- Marion
- Miller
- Mississippi
- Monroe
- Montgomery
- Nevada
- Newton
- Ouachita
- Perry
- Phillips
- Pike
- Poinsett
- Polk
- Pope
- Prairie
- Pulaski
- Randolph
- Saint Francis
- Saline
- Scott
- Searcy
- Sebastian
- Sevier
- Sharp
- Stone
- Union
- Van Buren
- Washington
- White
- Woodruff
- Yell