Knox County Local Demographic Profile

Knox County, Missouri – key demographics

Population size

  • 3,744 (2020 Decennial Census)
  • 3,8xx (2018–2022 ACS 5-year estimate; small-sample county, use ACS values as estimates)

Age

  • Median age: ~45–46 years (ACS 2018–2022)
  • Under 18: ~20–21%
  • 18 to 64: ~57%
  • 65 and over: ~22–24%

Sex

  • Female: ~50%
  • Male: ~50%

Race and ethnicity (ACS 2018–2022; race alone unless noted)

  • White: ~95–96%
  • Black or African American: ~0.5–1%
  • American Indian/Alaska Native: ~0.3–0.5%
  • Asian: ~0.1–0.3%
  • Two or more races: ~3%
  • Hispanic or Latino (of any race): ~1.5–2%

Households (ACS 2018–2022)

  • Total households: ~1,600–1,700
  • Persons per household: ~2.2–2.3
  • Family households: ~65–67% of households; average family size: ~2.8
  • Owner-occupied: ~75–80%; renter-occupied: ~20–25%

Insights

  • Very small, aging, and predominantly White rural population
  • Small household sizes and high owner-occupancy consistent with rural Missouri counties

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Decennial Census and 2018–2022 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Notes: ACS values are survey estimates and may not sum perfectly due to rounding and overlapping race/ethnicity definitions.

Email Usage in Knox County

Knox County, MO snapshot (2024 est.)

  • Population ≈3,750; density ≈7.4 residents per sq. mile; ≈1,600 households.

Email usage

  • Estimated adult email users: ≈2,600 (≈87% of adults; ≈69% of total residents).
  • Gender split among users: ≈51% women, 49% men.

Age distribution of email users (share and count)

  • 18–29: ≈14% (≈360)
  • 30–49: ≈31% (≈800)
  • 50–64: ≈27% (≈700)
  • 65+: ≈28% (≈730) Participation is highest among 30–49, with steady gains among 65+.

Digital access and trends

  • Households with a computer: ≈85%.
  • Internet subscription (any): ≈78%; fixed broadband: ≈70%.
  • Smartphone‑only internet: ≈8–10% of households.
  • No home internet subscription: ≈22–25%.
  • Broadband subscription has risen ~10 percentage points since 2016 as fiber/coax expanded around population centers (e.g., Edina); outer areas rely on DSL, fixed wireless, or satellite.

Connectivity facts

  • Service quality varies: 25–100+ Mbps where cable/fiber is present; often <25 Mbps in sparsely populated townships.
  • Mobile coverage is patchy outside towns, reinforcing reliance on home broadband or public access points (library/schools).

Mobile Phone Usage in Knox County

Mobile phone usage profile for Knox County, Missouri (2024)

Context

  • Small, sparsely populated, rural county in northeast Missouri with an older-than-state-average age structure and below-state median household income. These fundamentals shape adoption, plan mix, and reliance on cellular for home internet.

Estimated user base

  • Total mobile phone users (any mobile phone): 2,600–2,900 residents
    • Method note: derived from county population in the mid-3,000s, adult share typical of rural Missouri, and nationally observed rural mobile-phone adoption rates among adults and teens.
  • Smartphone users: 2,200–2,600 residents
    • Smartphone share of mobile users is lower than Missouri’s metro-heavy average but broadly in line with rural U.S. adoption.
  • Mobile-only internet households: 18–25% of households rely primarily on cellular data for home internet, materially higher than the statewide share
  • Plan mix:
    • Postpaid: 55–65%
    • Prepaid/MVNO: 35–45% (higher than state average due to income mix, credit access, and lighter multi-line family plans)

Demographic breakdown and usage patterns

  • Age
    • 18–34: very high smartphone take-up (low-to-mid 90s percent), app-centric usage, social and video dominant
    • 35–64: high ownership (mid-to-high 80s percent), balanced use of voice, messaging, and apps; growing use of mobile banking and telehealth
    • 65+: lower smartphone penetration (roughly two-thirds), higher incidence of voice-and-text-first usage and basic/older devices; rising adoption of large-screen smartphones for telehealth and messaging
  • Income and education
    • Lower-income households are more likely to be smartphone-only for home connectivity, more price-sensitive, and over-index on prepaid and MVNO plans
    • Households with college education track closer to statewide smartphone and mobile-broadband adoption levels
  • Household composition
    • Smaller household sizes reduce the prevalence of multi-line family bundles; single-line and two-line accounts are common

Digital infrastructure and coverage

  • Networks present: AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile are the dominant underlying networks; UScellular has a footprint in rural northeast Missouri; a variety of MVNOs (e.g., Cricket, Metro, Visible, Boost, Straight Talk) operate over these networks
  • Radio access and 5G
    • Primary experience is 4G LTE across most populated corridors, with low-band 5G present along key routes and in town centers; mid-band 5G is limited; mmWave is not a factor
    • Coverage gaps occur in low-lying areas and along lightly traveled rural roads; signal boosters and Wi‑Fi calling are commonly used mitigations
  • Mobile internet speeds
    • Downlink performance is serviceable for messaging, web, and SD/HD video in towns and along highways, but uplink and indoor performance degrade faster than in Missouri’s urban counties; peak speeds lag state averages due to sparser site density and limited mid-band 5G
  • Fixed connectivity interplay
    • Fiber is limited to select locations; cable plant is minimal; legacy DSL and fixed wireless ISPs serve many rural addresses; satellite (notably Starlink) has grown
    • These gaps raise the role of cellular as a primary or fallback home connection (hotspots, 4G/5G fixed wireless access)

How Knox County differs from Missouri statewide

  • Higher mobile dependency
    • A notably larger share of households rely on cellular as their main or only home internet, versus Missouri’s statewide average
  • Lower 5G availability and capacity
    • 5G coverage is less extensive and more reliant on low-band spectrum; mid-band capacity is sparser than in metro counties, so peak and indoor performance lag the state average
  • Older-device mix and slower replacement
    • A higher share of residents use older handsets and hold devices longer, which tempers 5G uptake compared with statewide patterns
  • Plan economics
    • Greater reliance on prepaid/MVNO options and single-line plans; fewer premium unlimited lines per household than the statewide mix
  • Usage profile
    • Voice and SMS remain more prominent relative to statewide app/video-heavy patterns, especially among seniors; telehealth usage via mobile is elevated where home broadband is weak

Implications

  • Public services and local businesses should continue to prioritize mobile-first, low-bandwidth channels (responsive sites, SMS alerts, app-lite experiences) and support Wi‑Fi calling in public buildings
  • Emergency communications benefit from multi-carrier redundancy and signal booster placement in known dead zones
  • Mid-band 5G and additional macro/small-cell sites along rural corridors would close the biggest performance gaps, but interim gains can be realized by promoting device upgrades, VoLTE/Wi‑Fi calling configuration, and fixed wireless access where fiber is not imminent

Sources and methodology

  • Estimates synthesize county population and age structure with recent federal datasets (American Community Survey computer and internet-use indicators), national rural mobile adoption benchmarks (e.g., Pew Research), and FCC broadband/coverage filings as of 2023–2024. Figures are provided as ranges to reflect county-level variability and margins of error common in small-population geographies.

Social Media Trends in Knox County

Social media usage in Knox County, Missouri (modeled 2024–2025)

Snapshot

  • County context: Small, rural county (2020 Census population ≈3,700), skewing older than the U.S. average. Estimates below are for adults (18+) and are rounded to whole percentages. They are modeled from 2024 Pew Research platform adoption, adjusted for rural Midwest age/sex mix and connectivity patterns. Expect ±3–5 percentage points.

Most‑used platforms (share of adults using each at least occasionally)

  • YouTube: 80%
  • Facebook: 74%
  • Facebook Messenger: 68%
  • Instagram: 37%
  • Pinterest: 32%
  • TikTok: 28%
  • Snapchat: 24%
  • LinkedIn: 17%
  • Reddit: 11%
  • X (Twitter): 12%
  • WhatsApp: 11%
  • Nextdoor: 4%

Age pattern (percent of each age group using the platform)

  • 18–29: YouTube 95%; Instagram 75%; Snapchat 65%; TikTok 62%; Facebook 52%; Reddit 25%; X 15%
  • 30–49: YouTube 90%; Facebook 80%; Instagram 50%; TikTok 32%; Snapchat 30%; Pinterest 40%; LinkedIn 25%
  • 50–64: Facebook 75%; YouTube 72%; Instagram 32%; Pinterest 35%; TikTok 20%; Snapchat 12%
  • 65+: Facebook 62%; YouTube 60%; Instagram 18%; Pinterest 22%; TikTok 10%; Snapchat 6%

Gender breakdown (share of men/women using the platform)

  • Facebook: Men 70% | Women 78%
  • YouTube: Men 82% | Women 78%
  • Instagram: Men 36% | Women 38%
  • TikTok: Men 25% | Women 30%
  • Snapchat: Men 20% | Women 28%
  • Pinterest: Men 15% | Women 45%
  • Reddit: Men 16% | Women 6%
  • X (Twitter): Men 14% | Women 10%
  • LinkedIn: Men 18% | Women 16%
  • WhatsApp: Men 11% | Women 11%

Behavioral trends and local usage patterns

  • Facebook is the community hub: Local news, school and church updates, high‑school sports, buy/sell/trade and lost‑and‑found groups, fundraisers, weather alerts, obituaries, and county/municipal announcements drive engagement. Marketplace activity is strong relative to population size.
  • Video is pervasive but lean‑back: YouTube is widely used for how‑to content (farm, home repair, equipment), hunting/outdoors, and local/regional sports. Live video for school events and local meetings appears primarily on Facebook, with some cross‑posting to YouTube.
  • Younger adults cluster on visual/messaging apps: 18–29s rely on Snapchat for daily communication, Instagram for social identity, and TikTok for entertainment and trends; they still keep a Facebook account for local coordination.
  • Older adults skew to Facebook + Pinterest: 50+ residents are heavy Facebook users for community information; women 35–64 are the core of local Pinterest usage (recipes, crafts, home projects).
  • Messaging gravity: Facebook Messenger is the de facto group‑chat tool for families, churches, teams, and volunteer groups; WhatsApp use is limited and tends to appear among households with out‑of‑area ties.
  • X (Twitter) and Reddit are niche: Used mainly by a small subset of younger men, sports bettors/fans, tech/gaming enthusiasts, and public‑safety followers; little evidence of broad community conversation shifting there.
  • Posting cadence and timing: Engagement peaks evenings (7–10 pm) and weekends; severe‑weather days and school/sports milestones create sharp surges. Most local businesses post 1–3 times per week on Facebook rather than maintaining full websites.

Notes on interpretation

  • Figures are modeled, not from a Knox‑only survey, but they reflect rural Midwest patterns and the county’s age structure; they are designed to be decision‑ready for planning and outreach.