Cooper County Local Demographic Profile
Do you prefer figures from:
- 2020 Decennial Census (official counts; best for race/ethnicity, basic age/sex), or
- ACS 2018–2022 5-year estimates (most comprehensive for age and household characteristics)?
If no preference, I’ll use ACS 2018–2022 and provide: total population, median age, age cohorts (under 18, 65+), sex split, race/ethnicity shares, number of households, average household size, family vs. nonfamily, and homeownership.
Email Usage in Cooper County
Cooper County, MO email snapshot (estimates)
- Population: ~17.5k; largely rural with ~30–35 people per square mile. Boonville (I‑70 corridor) is the main population center.
- Estimated email users: 12–14k residents use email at least occasionally.
- Age profile (share using email):
- 18–29: ~90–95%
- 30–49: ~95–98%
- 50–64: ~88–92%
- 65+: ~75–85%
- Teens (13–17): ~70–85% use email, often for school/accounts.
- Gender split: ~50/50; negligible difference in usage by gender.
- Digital access trends:
- Household broadband subscription roughly 75–85%, higher in Boonville and along I‑70; lower in outlying farms.
- Mix of cable/fiber in towns, DSL and fixed‑wireless in rural areas; satellite remains a fallback.
- 4G/5G mobile coverage is strong near highways and towns; patchier in river valleys and low‑lying areas.
- Smartphone ownership is widespread; a noticeable minority of rural households are smartphone‑only for internet.
- Ongoing fiber builds by regional providers/electric co‑ops are improving rural speeds; fixed‑wireless (including 5G) is expanding.
- Local connectivity note: Residents near Boonville typically see 100+ Mbps fixed options; many remote areas still rely on 25/3 Mbps–class service, affecting rich‑media email use and large attachments.
Mobile Phone Usage in Cooper County
Here’s a concise, county-specific picture based on 2020–2024 statewide benchmarks, rural-Missouri patterns, FCC coverage maps, and central-MO infrastructure developments. Figures are rounded estimates intended for planning; local validation is recommended.
Quick take
- Cooper County’s mobile adoption is slightly below the Missouri average, with a more rural usage profile: more Android and prepaid lines, lower cellular data per user (strong home fiber offload), and more ag/IoT lines per capita.
- Coverage is robust along I-70/Boonville, thinner in river bottoms and low-density townships.
- Proximity to Columbia and the I-70 corridor shapes investment and daytime traffic patterns.
User estimates
- Population basis: ~17–18k residents; ~13–14k adults.
- Smartphone adoption (adults): 78–84% in Cooper vs ~86–88% statewide → roughly 10–12k adult smartphone users.
- Total consumer handset lines: ~14–16k (higher if including tablets/watches); machine-to-machine/IoT (farm, telemetry) adds an estimated 1–2k lines.
- Platform mix: Android 60–65% / iOS 35–40% (state closer to ~55/45).
- Plan type: Prepaid and discount-MVNO share higher (about 35–45% of handset lines vs ~25–30% statewide).
- Mobile-only internet households: 15–20% countywide, with pockets higher where wired broadband is limited (state ~12–14%).
- Cellular data usage: Per-smartphone monthly usage tends to be lower than the state average due to strong home fiber/cable offload, except in pockets lacking wired service where usage is higher.
Demographic patterns affecting usage
- Age: Older median age than Missouri overall. Seniors show lower smartphone adoption and a small but notable feature-phone share; youth/working-age adults are near-universal smartphone users.
- Income/education: Slightly below state averages → more price-sensitive plan choices (prepaid/MVNO), slower device refresh cycles, and higher family-plan concentration.
- Race/ethnicity: Predominantly White; adoption gaps by race are smaller among younger cohorts attending/working near Columbia and Boonville.
Digital infrastructure and coverage
- Macro coverage: Strong along I-70 and around Boonville; weaker signal and capacity in sparsely populated areas north/south of the interstate and in river valleys (Missouri and Lamine).
- 5G status:
- T-Mobile: Broad low-band 5G across most of the county; mid-band capacity strongest along I-70/Boonville.
- Verizon: Solid LTE footprint; C-band 5G concentrated along I-70 and town centers.
- AT&T: Good LTE along corridors; 5G present in/near Boonville and main routes, expanding outward; FirstNet buildouts have improved public-safety coverage.
- mmWave: Not a factor outside a few dense nodes (if any).
- Backhaul and wired broadband:
- Notable fiber from regional electric co-op builds (e.g., Co-Mo Connect) and cable in Boonville reduce reliance on cellular for at-home use.
- Fixed wireless (including 5G Home) available along the interstate/near towns; traditional WISPs serve outer areas.
- Capacity and reliability:
- Investment is corridor-centric; peak load follows commuting/school/work patterns toward Columbia and along I-70.
- Terrain-driven dead zones persist away from major roads; handset selection with stronger radios and Wi-Fi calling are common mitigation strategies.
How Cooper County differs from Missouri overall
- Slightly lower adult smartphone adoption and higher feature-phone retention among seniors.
- Higher Android and prepaid/MVNO share.
- More machine-to-machine/IoT lines per capita tied to agriculture and utilities.
- Lower average cellular data per user where fiber is widespread; higher mobile-only reliance in pockets without wired broadband.
- Coverage and 5G capacity are more polarized: very strong on the I-70 spine and town centers, thinner elsewhere.
- Daytime network demand is more corridor- and commuter-driven due to proximity to Columbia.
Social Media Trends in Cooper County
Below is a concise, best-available snapshot for Cooper County, MO. Because there’s no public county-specific survey, figures are estimates extrapolated from Pew Research (2023–2024), rural Midwest patterns, and the county’s age mix. Treat percentages as directional.
Overview and user count
- Population context: ~17–18k residents; older and more rural than the U.S. average.
- Estimated social media users: ~10.5k–12.5k residents (about 60–72% of total; ~70–80% of ages 13+).
- Daily use: ~75–85% of users check at least once daily; multiple-platform use is common (2–4 platforms per user).
Age groups (share using at least one platform)
- Teens (13–17): 90–95%; heavy YouTube, TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram; low Facebook.
- 18–29: 85–90%; YouTube, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok; Facebook moderate.
- 30–49: 80–85%; Facebook and YouTube dominate; Instagram/TikTok moderate.
- 50–64: 70–75%; Facebook first, YouTube second; Pinterest notable.
- 65+: 45–55%; Facebook primary; YouTube secondary; others minimal.
Gender patterns
- Women: Over-index on Facebook and Pinterest; Instagram slight majority female; stronger participation in local groups, school/activities info, and Marketplace.
- Men: Over-index on YouTube, Reddit, and X (Twitter); more sports, news, DIY, and tech content consumption.
- Overall user base likely ~53–55% female, reflecting slightly higher engagement among women in rural FB ecosystems.
Most-used platforms (adults; approximate share who use the platform)
- YouTube: ~75–80%
- Facebook: ~70–75%
- Instagram: ~40–45% (skews under 40, women)
- Pinterest: ~30–35% (strong female skew)
- TikTok: ~25–35% (concentrated under 35)
- Snapchat: ~20–30% (teens/20s)
- LinkedIn: ~18–25% (lower in rural labor mix)
- X (Twitter): ~15–20% (male/news skew)
- Reddit: ~15–20% (male/younger skew)
- Nextdoor: ~5–10% (limited footprint outside larger metros)
Behavioral trends to know
- Facebook is the community hub: school districts, local government and emergency updates, church and civic groups, high school sports, yard/garage sales, and especially Marketplace for buy/sell/trade.
- Short-form video growth: Reels (FB/IG) and TikTok drive discovery; cross-posting is common for local businesses and events.
- Messaging is critical: Facebook Messenger is widely used for quick inquiries to small businesses and person-to-person commerce; WhatsApp presence is modest.
- Local news and weather: Heavy use of local TV/radio/newspaper pages; storm and road-condition updates see spikes.
- Commerce and services: Boosted FB posts outperform other paid channels for small businesses; word-of-mouth via group recommendations is influential.
- Timing: Evenings (7–9 pm) and weekend mornings see peak local engagement; Marketplace activity is strong on weekend mornings.
- Access constraints: Some reliance on mobile data in fringe areas; vertical, captioned, short videos perform better than long, high-bitrate uploads.
Notes for application
- To reach most adults quickly, start with Facebook + short-form video (FB/IG Reels); add YouTube for evergreen/how-to content.
- For younger audiences, prioritize TikTok/Instagram + Snapchat stories; for women 25–54, add Pinterest.
- Use local groups and Marketplace for event/community or retail promotions; keep posts visual, concise, and clearly local.
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Missouri
- Adair
- Andrew
- Atchison
- Audrain
- Barry
- Barton
- Bates
- Benton
- Bollinger
- Boone
- Buchanan
- Butler
- Caldwell
- Callaway
- Camden
- Cape Girardeau
- Carroll
- Carter
- Cass
- Cedar
- Chariton
- Christian
- Clark
- Clay
- Clinton
- Cole
- Crawford
- Dade
- Dallas
- Daviess
- Dekalb
- Dent
- Douglas
- Dunklin
- Franklin
- Gasconade
- Gentry
- Greene
- Grundy
- Harrison
- Henry
- Hickory
- Holt
- Howard
- Howell
- Iron
- Jackson
- Jasper
- Jefferson
- Johnson
- Knox
- Laclede
- Lafayette
- Lawrence
- Lewis
- Lincoln
- Linn
- Livingston
- Macon
- Madison
- Maries
- Marion
- Mcdonald
- Mercer
- Miller
- Mississippi
- Moniteau
- Monroe
- Montgomery
- Morgan
- New Madrid
- Newton
- Nodaway
- Oregon
- Osage
- Ozark
- Pemiscot
- Perry
- Pettis
- Phelps
- Pike
- Platte
- Polk
- Pulaski
- Putnam
- Ralls
- Randolph
- Ray
- Reynolds
- Ripley
- Saint Charles
- Saint Clair
- Saint Francois
- Saint Louis
- Saint Louis City
- Sainte Genevieve
- Saline
- Schuyler
- Scotland
- Scott
- Shannon
- Shelby
- Stoddard
- Stone
- Sullivan
- Taney
- Texas
- Vernon
- Warren
- Washington
- Wayne
- Webster
- Worth
- Wright