Harrison County

Harrison County is located in northwestern Missouri along the Iowa border, within the state’s glaciated “prairie country” region. Established in 1845 and named for U.S. Representative Albert G. Harrison, the county developed as an agricultural area tied to small-market towns and regional trade routes across northern Missouri. It is sparsely populated and small in overall scale, with a population of roughly 8,000 residents. The landscape is characterized by rolling farmland, pasture, and stream valleys, with settlements that remain predominantly rural. Agriculture and related services form the core of the local economy, and land use is dominated by row crops and livestock production. Bethany serves as the county seat and principal population center, providing county government functions and local commercial services. Transportation access includes Interstate 35, which runs through the county and links it to larger metropolitan areas to the south and north.

Harrison County is located in northwestern Missouri along the Iowa border, within the state’s rural “Northwest Missouri” region. The county seat is Bethany; for local government and planning resources, visit the Harrison County official website.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Harrison County, Missouri, the county’s population size is reported by the Census Bureau for decennial census counts and annual estimates. Exact figures should be taken directly from QuickFacts (which displays the most recent available estimate and the most recent decennial census count for the county).

Age & Gender

The U.S. Census Bureau’s data.census.gov platform provides county-level tables for:

• Age distribution (standard age brackets and median age), typically from the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates.
• Gender composition (male/female population counts and shares), also available through ACS tables.

A consolidated, county-specific snapshot of age and sex is also accessible via the Census Bureau’s QuickFacts page for Harrison County.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

County-level race and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity shares are published by the U.S. Census Bureau through:

• The QuickFacts demographic characteristics section for Harrison County (commonly shown as percentages by race and by Hispanic or Latino origin).
• Detailed race/ethnicity tables and methodology via data.census.gov (ACS 5-year estimates and decennial census tables).

Household & Housing Data

Household and housing indicators for Harrison County are published by the U.S. Census Bureau, including (where available in the selected vintage):

• Number of households and average household size
• Owner-occupied vs. renter-occupied housing
• Housing unit counts, vacancy rates, and selected housing characteristics These are available on the Harrison County QuickFacts page and in more detail through housing and household tables on data.census.gov.

Notes on Data Availability

County-level demographic profiles are available from the U.S. Census Bureau, but the exact numeric values vary by dataset vintage (decennial census vs. annual population estimates vs. ACS 5-year). The authoritative, continuously updated county summary is the Census Bureau QuickFacts page for Harrison County, Missouri, which compiles the latest published measures for population, age/sex, race/ethnicity, households, and housing.

Harrison County, in northwestern Missouri, is largely rural with low population density, making last‑mile broadband buildout more costly and contributing to uneven digital communication access. Direct county-level email usage statistics are not routinely published; broadband and device access serve as proxies for likely email adoption.

Digital access indicators from the U.S. Census Bureau data portal (American Community Survey) report household access to a computer and broadband subscriptions, which are closely tied to routine email use for work, education, and services. County age structure from the American Community Survey also matters: higher shares of older residents generally correlate with lower adoption of some online activities, including email, while working-age shares tend to align with higher use through employment and institutions. Gender composition is available in ACS tables but is typically less predictive of email adoption than age and connectivity.

Connectivity limitations are shaped by service availability and network performance in rural areas; the FCC National Broadband Map provides location-based coverage information that can highlight gaps affecting consistent email access.

Harrison County is located in northwestern Missouri along the Iowa border, with Bethany as the county seat. The county is predominantly rural, with low population density and extensive agricultural land. These characteristics generally increase the cost per mile of building and maintaining cellular and fiber infrastructure, and they raise the likelihood of coverage gaps and weaker indoor signal in sparsely populated areas compared with Missouri’s metropolitan counties. County geography is mostly rolling plains rather than mountainous terrain, so topographic blockage is typically less significant than distance to towers and backhaul availability.

Key distinction: network availability vs. adoption

• Network availability refers to where mobile carriers report service (coverage) and what technologies are offered (4G LTE and 5G).
• Adoption refers to whether residents actually subscribe to mobile service and use mobile broadband, and whether mobile service is used as a primary internet connection in households.

County-level adoption measures are limited and are often available only through modeled estimates or survey products with geographic constraints. Network availability data is more commonly published at fine geographic resolution, though it relies on provider reporting.

Mobile penetration / access indicators (county-level availability and adoption limits)

• County-level mobile subscription (“penetration”) statistics are not consistently published as an official, directly comparable metric for a single county. Most commonly cited adoption sources (such as federal surveys) are designed for national/state estimates and are not always reliable at the county level due to sampling limitations.
• Household internet adoption (including smartphone-only households) is more commonly measured than mobile plan adoption, but county-level breakouts may be suppressed or modeled depending on the dataset. The most authoritative public source for household connectivity indicators is the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS), accessed via Census.gov data tables, which include measures such as “household has a cellular data plan” and other internet subscription types. Availability of a clean county estimate depends on the specific table/year and margin-of-error constraints.

Limitation: ACS “cellular data plan” variables reflect household subscription/adoption, not signal quality or geographic coverage, and they do not distinguish 4G vs. 5G use.

Mobile internet usage patterns and technology availability (4G / 5G)

Network availability (reported coverage)

• The most widely used official federal dataset for carrier-reported mobile broadband coverage is the FCC’s Broadband Data Collection (BDC). This can be viewed through the FCC National Broadband Map, which supports map-based inspection and provider/technology filtering.
• In rural counties such as Harrison County, 4G LTE is typically the baseline wide-area mobile broadband layer. 5G availability can be present but often appears as patchier footprints outside towns and highway corridors, depending on the carrier and spectrum band deployed.

Important measurement note: The FCC map represents where providers report they can offer service, which can differ from typical user experience indoors, at the edge of coverage, or in areas with limited tower density.

Actual usage patterns (what residents use in practice)

• Public, official datasets generally do not report county-specific shares of traffic by 4G vs. 5G. Usage behavior is shaped by handset capability (5G phone vs. LTE-only), plan features, and whether 5G signal is consistently available in the places people spend time (home, work, school, travel corridors).
• In low-density rural areas, mobile broadband is commonly used as a supplemental connection (on-the-go connectivity) and, in some locations lacking wired broadband options, as a primary home internet connection via smartphone hotspot or fixed wireless/cellular home internet products. County-level confirmation of the share of “mobile-only” households depends on ACS table availability and statistical reliability in that geography via Census.gov.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

• At the county level, public datasets rarely enumerate device type (smartphone vs. feature phone) directly. The most relevant official proxy is ACS household measures indicating a cellular data plan and the presence/absence of other subscription types (cable/fiber/DSL/satellite), available through Census.gov.
• In general U.S. usage patterns, smartphones dominate mobile internet access. For Harrison County specifically, device-type composition is best inferred indirectly through broader regional/national patterns rather than asserted as a county statistic, because authoritative county-level device inventories are not typically published in official sources.

Limitation: Without a county-representative survey reporting device ownership categories, statements about the exact smartphone/feature-phone split in Harrison County are not supportable as definitive county metrics.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity

Rural settlement patterns and infrastructure economics

• Low population density tends to reduce the number of towers per square mile that is economically justified, which can produce larger cell sizes, weaker indoor coverage in some areas, and more dead zones along secondary roads.
• Distance to fiber backhaul and middle-mile infrastructure affects network capacity and the feasibility of dense 5G deployments. Rural tower sites can rely on longer backhaul runs, sometimes constraining throughput during peak hours.

Community anchor locations and corridors

• Coverage and performance typically concentrate around county seat/towns, schools, healthcare facilities, and major road corridors, reflecting where demand is higher and sites are easier to justify. The FCC map is the most direct way to examine these spatial patterns for Harrison County via the FCC National Broadband Map.

Socioeconomic and age-related factors (adoption side)

• Household adoption of mobile broadband (and reliance on mobile as a primary connection) is often associated with income, housing stability, and age composition. County-level quantification should use ACS variables and margins of error via Census.gov, since provider coverage data does not measure affordability or subscription.

Data sources and what they measure (recommended for Harrison County documentation)

• Network availability (coverage, technology, providers): FCC National Broadband Map (BDC) (provider-reported availability; filter for “Mobile Broadband” and technology generations where available).
• Household adoption and subscription context (including cellular data plan presence): U.S. Census Bureau ACS tables (household-reported subscriptions; includes margins of error; not a coverage measure).
• State-level broadband planning context: Missouri Office of Broadband Development (program context, mapping resources, and statewide initiatives; may not provide definitive county-specific mobile adoption statistics).

Summary (availability vs. adoption)

• Availability: Harrison County’s mobile connectivity footprint can be documented using carrier-reported FCC BDC coverage. Rural conditions typically correspond to broad 4G LTE coverage with more limited or uneven 5G footprints outside population centers and key corridors, as reflected on the FCC map.
• Adoption: Direct county-level mobile penetration and device-type splits are not consistently available as definitive public metrics. Household adoption indicators such as cellular data plan presence are best sourced from ACS on Census.gov, recognizing that these measure subscriptions and household reporting rather than service quality or geographic reach.

Harrison County is a rural county in northwestern Missouri on the Iowa border, with Bethany as the county seat and an economy oriented around agriculture and small-town services. Its older age profile and lower population density than Missouri’s metro areas tend to align with heavier Facebook use and comparatively lower adoption of newer, urban-leaning platforms.

User statistics (local availability and best proxies)

• County-specific social media penetration: No reputable, publicly available dataset regularly publishes platform penetration rates at the county level for Harrison County.
• Best-available benchmarks (U.S. adults): National survey data provides the most reliable reference for likely usage levels in a rural Missouri county. The Pew Research Center social media fact sheet reports that a large majority of U.S. adults use at least one social media site, with usage varying strongly by age and (to a lesser extent) by gender and community type.

Age group trends (strongest driver of differences)

Based on nationally representative U.S. patterns reported by Pew Research Center:

• Highest overall usage: Adults 18–29 have the highest social media adoption across most major platforms.
• Middle-high usage: Adults 30–49 remain high users, often showing a mix of Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and (increasingly) TikTok.
• Lower usage: Adults 50–64 use social media at lower rates than younger groups, concentrating more on Facebook and YouTube than trend-driven platforms.
• Lowest usage: Adults 65+ are least likely to use many social platforms, though Facebook and YouTube remain comparatively common among those who are active.

Gender breakdown (platform-specific skew)

National research indicates gender differences are generally platform-dependent rather than a large overall gap:

• Women higher: Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest (women more likely than men to use these platforms, per Pew’s platform-by-platform estimates).
• Men slightly higher: Some platforms show higher male usage in national surveys (commonly cited for Reddit and certain messaging/tech-forward communities), though rural adoption can be constrained by local demographics and interests.
• Overall: Gender gaps tend to be smaller than age-related differences for most platforms.

Most-used platforms (percentages from reputable national surveys)

The most dependable percentages come from Pew’s national estimates for U.S. adults (Pew Research Center: Social Media Use). These figures describe the U.S. baseline rather than county-specific rates:

• YouTube: ~8 in 10 U.S. adults
• Facebook: ~2 in 3 U.S. adults
• Instagram: ~1 in 2 U.S. adults
• Pinterest: ~4 in 10 U.S. adults
• TikTok: ~1 in 3 U.S. adults
• LinkedIn: ~3 in 10 U.S. adults
• X (formerly Twitter): ~1 in 5 U.S. adults
• Snapchat: ~3 in 10 U.S. adults
• WhatsApp: ~3 in 10 U.S. adults
• Reddit: ~2 in 10 U.S. adults

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and platform preferences)

Drawing from established national findings, with rural-county context consistent with those patterns:

• Facebook as a local information hub: In rural areas, Facebook commonly functions as an all-purpose channel for community news, school and church announcements, local buy/sell activity, and event promotion, reflecting its broad cross-age adoption (supported by Pew’s consistently high Facebook reach among older adults: Pew platform detail).
• YouTube for how-to and entertainment: High YouTube reach nationally aligns with practical uses relevant to rural communities (how-to content, repairs, agriculture-related topics, local/regional sports and entertainment).
• Short-form video concentrated among younger adults: TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts engagement tends to be highest among younger cohorts; this is consistent with Pew’s age-skewed adoption patterns.
• Messaging and community groups: Facebook Groups and Messenger-style communication often substitute for more formal local media channels in smaller communities, concentrating engagement around groups rather than public posting.
• Lower emphasis on professional networking: LinkedIn usage is substantial nationally but generally aligns more with metro professional sectors; in rural counties it often represents a smaller share of day-to-day social media activity even when accounts exist.

Source note: County-level platform penetration and demographic splits for Harrison County are not typically published in open, methodologically transparent form. The most reliable, citable percentages for usage and demographics come from national probability surveys such as the Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.

Harrison County, Missouri public records relevant to family and associates primarily include vital records and court filings. Birth and death certificates are Missouri state vital records filed locally but issued through the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS), Bureau of Vital Records; county offices generally accept applications or provide local guidance, while certified copies are issued under state rules (Missouri DHSS Vital Records). Marriage licenses are typically maintained by the county recorder; the Harrison County Recorder of Deeds provides access information and contact details (Harrison County Recorder of Deeds). Divorce, paternity, guardianship, and adoption-related filings are maintained by the Circuit Court; adoption records are generally restricted under Missouri law, and access is managed through the court system (Missouri Courts – 13th Judicial Circuit (Harrison County)).

Public databases include statewide case and docket access via Missouri Case.net for many non-confidential court cases (Missouri Case.net). Recorded document search availability varies by office; the county recorder site lists current access options.

Access occurs online through state portals (Case.net; DHSS information) and in person through the Recorder of Deeds and the Circuit Clerk for copies, certifications, and file inspection. Privacy restrictions commonly apply to adoption records, certain family court matters, and certified vital records, which may be limited to eligible requesters under state regulations.

Types of records available

• Marriage license and marriage record (certificate/return)
  Marriage records in Harrison County typically consist of the marriage license application and the marriage return/certificate completed by the officiant and returned to the recorder. Some files also include supporting paperwork (for example, consent documentation when applicable).

• Divorce records (court case file, judgment/decree)
  Divorce records are maintained as circuit court case records, usually including the Judgment and Decree of Dissolution of Marriage and related filings (petitions, motions, affidavits, settlement agreements, parenting plan, and child support forms when relevant).

• Annulment records
  Annulments are also maintained as circuit court case records and typically include a judgment/decree of nullity and associated pleadings and exhibits.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

• Marriage records (filed with the county recorder)
  Marriage licenses and returns are recorded and kept by the Harrison County Recorder of Deeds. Access is commonly provided through:

  • In-person requests at the Recorder of Deeds office (certified and non-certified copies may be available per office practice).
  • Mail requests (often requiring identifying details and payment).
  • Online index/search and copy ordering may be available through county systems or third-party vendors used by the county for recorded-document search.

• Divorce and annulment records (filed with the circuit court)
  Divorce and annulment actions are filed with the Harrison County Circuit Court (Missouri state trial court) and maintained by the Circuit Clerk as court records. Access is commonly provided through:

  • In-person review of public case records at the courthouse, subject to redactions and access controls.
  • Copy requests through the Circuit Clerk (certified copies of judgments/decrees are commonly available).
  • Online case information for Missouri courts is often available through the statewide Case.net system (docket-level details; document images may be limited and sensitive information is restricted). Link: Missouri Courts Case.net.

• Missouri Bureau of Vital Records (state-level copies)
  Missouri maintains statewide vital records for marriages and divorces, commonly used for verification and certified copies, subject to state eligibility rules. Link: Missouri Department of Health & Senior Services — Vital Records.

Typical information included in these records

• Marriage license/record

  • Full names of the parties (including maiden name where applicable)
  • Date and place (county) of issuance
  • Date and place of marriage ceremony
  • Officiant’s name and title, and officiant certification/return
  • Ages or dates of birth, residences/addresses at time of application (varies by era and form)
  • Parents’ names and birthplaces may appear on some applications (varies by era)

• Divorce decree (judgment of dissolution)

  • Names of the parties and the court case number
  • Date the dissolution was granted and the county/court
  • Findings and orders regarding:
    • Division of marital property and debts
    • Spousal maintenance (alimony), where ordered
    • Child custody, visitation, and child support, where applicable
    • Restoration of former name, where requested and granted
  • Incorporated agreements (for example, marital settlement agreement/parenting plan) may be referenced or attached in the case file

• Annulment judgment (decree of nullity)

  • Names of the parties and the court case number
  • Date of judgment and legal basis for annulment as addressed by the court
  • Orders regarding property, support, and children when applicable under Missouri law

Privacy or legal restrictions

• Marriage records

  • Marriage records recorded by a county recorder are generally treated as public records, though access practices and the format of released copies can vary.
  • Some personal identifiers (for example, Social Security numbers) are subject to redaction requirements and are not released in public copies.

• Divorce and annulment court records

  • Missouri court records are generally public, but portions may be confidential or sealed by law or court order.
  • Protected information (for example, Social Security numbers, financial account numbers, and certain information involving minors) is typically redacted or restricted.
  • Some filings in family law matters (such as certain confidential information sheets) are not publicly accessible even when the case docket is viewable.

• Certified copies and identity/eligibility rules

  • Certified copies of vital records issued at the state level are subject to Missouri’s vital records eligibility and identification requirements. Access to older records may be less restricted than access to more recent records, depending on state rules and record type.

Harrison County is in northwestern Missouri along the Iowa border, with Bethany as the county seat and largest population center. The county is predominantly rural with small towns and agricultural land uses, and it is part of the Kansas City–St. Joseph regional labor shed for some commuters. Population size and basic demographics are most consistently summarized in the U.S. Census Bureau’s county profile for Harrison County, Missouri.

Education Indicators

Public schools and school names

Harrison County public K–12 education is primarily provided through local school districts. A complete, authoritative count of “public schools” (school buildings) varies by year due to consolidations and grade-center configurations; the most reliable public directory is the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) entity listings for Missouri DESE (search by county/district).

• Major districts serving the county include:
  • Bethany R‑II School District (Bethany)
  • South Harrison R‑II School District (near Ridgeway)
  • North Harrison R‑III School District (near Eagleville)
  • Portions of the county may also be served by adjacent-district boundaries depending on residence location (common in rural counties).

School names (building-level) are best taken directly from DESE’s current district/building directory because building names can change with grade reconfigurations.

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

• Student–teacher ratios: Published ratios differ by district and year; DESE’s district-level reports and the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) are the standard references for official staffing and enrollment counts. For district report cards and staffing metrics, use DESE’s Missouri Comprehensive Data System (MCDS).
• Graduation rates: Missouri reports cohort graduation rates by district and high school through DESE. In rural north Missouri districts, graduation rates commonly trend in the high 80s to 90s (%) range, but countywide aggregation is not published as a single “Harrison County rate” in most sources; the definitive values are district/high-school specific in DESE MCDS.

Adult educational attainment

Adult attainment is most consistently available from the U.S. Census Bureau (ACS 5‑year estimates) in the county profile:

• High school graduate or higher (age 25+): Reported in data.census.gov (Educational Attainment table in the profile).
• Bachelor’s degree or higher (age 25+): Reported in the same ACS county profile. These ACS estimates are the most recent “official” countywide measures and are updated annually as rolling multi‑year estimates.

Notable programs (STEM, vocational training, AP)

Program availability is typically district-specific rather than countywide. Common offerings in Missouri public high schools include:

• Career and Technical Education (CTE)/vocational pathways aligned to Missouri’s CTE standards and regional career centers (where applicable).
• Advanced Placement (AP) and/or dual credit opportunities, which vary by high school size and staffing. The definitive program lists are maintained in district course catalogs and DESE program reporting. The most consistent statewide program context is summarized through DESE program pages and district report cards via DESE MCDS.

School safety measures and counseling resources

Missouri districts commonly report:

• Emergency operations planning (drills, coordinated response procedures)
• Building access controls and visitor management (varies by facility)
• School resource officer (SRO) arrangements or local law enforcement coordination (district-specific)
• Student support services, including school counselors; some districts supplement counseling with contracted mental health providers or regional services. Formal policies and staffing levels are documented at the district level (board policies, safety plans, and DESE reporting where applicable). Countywide “one-size” safety/counseling metrics are not typically published as a single consolidated statistic.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year available)

The most authoritative local unemployment estimates come from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) program and are distributed in Missouri through the state labor market information portal. The most recent annual and monthly estimates for Harrison County are available via:

• BLS LAUS
• Missouri economic and labor market information (jobs.mo.gov/data)

(A single numeric unemployment rate is not stated here because “most recent year available” changes over time; LAUS is the definitive source for the current published figure.)

Major industries and employment sectors

In rural north Missouri counties like Harrison, major employment sectors typically include:

• Health care and social assistance
• Retail trade
• Educational services (public schools)
• Manufacturing (often smaller plants or regional employers)
• Agriculture and related services (direct farm employment is undercounted in standard payroll datasets due to proprietors and seasonal patterns) County sector employment levels are reported through the Census Bureau’s OnTheMap (LEHD) and through Missouri labor market/industry staffing publications on jobs.mo.gov/data.

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

Occupational structure in rural Missouri counties is commonly weighted toward:

• Office and administrative support
• Production and transportation/material moving
• Sales and related
• Healthcare support and practitioners (in smaller absolute numbers)
• Management and business occupations (often tied to small businesses and public administration) Occupation-by-residence and occupation-by-workplace detail can be summarized using OnTheMap (Workforce Characteristics).

Commuting patterns and mean commute times

• Mean travel time to work and commuting mode share (drive alone, carpool, etc.) are published in the U.S. Census Bureau ACS commuting tables and summarized in the county profile at data.census.gov.
• Rural counties commonly show high drive-alone shares and longer commutes for out-of-county workers, reflecting limited local job density outside the county seat.

Local employment versus out-of-county work

• Inflow/outflow (resident workers working in-county vs. out-of-county) is best measured using OnTheMap (Inflow/Outflow reports). This is the standard dataset used nationally to quantify commuting flows between counties.
• Harrison County typically functions as a net exporter of some labor (residents commuting to jobs in other counties) while also retaining employment in local services (schools, county government, healthcare, retail).

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership rate and rental share

• The U.S. Census Bureau ACS provides the owner-occupied vs. renter-occupied distribution for Harrison County in the housing section of data.census.gov.
• Rural Missouri counties typically have higher homeownership rates than large metros, with rentals concentrated in the county seat and near employment nodes.

Median property values and recent trends

• Median value of owner-occupied housing units is published by ACS in the county profile at data.census.gov.
• Recent trends: Many rural Missouri markets experienced value appreciation during 2020–2023 consistent with statewide and national patterns, with variation by town versus open-country properties. ACS provides annually updated rolling estimates; deed-based indices are less complete for very small markets.

Typical rent prices

• Median gross rent is published in the ACS housing tables for Harrison County and summarized at data.census.gov.
• In rural counties, rents commonly vary significantly by unit type and age (single-family rentals versus small multifamily buildings), with the most consistent benchmark being the ACS median.

Types of housing (single-family homes, apartments, rural lots)

• The county’s housing stock is typically dominated by single-family detached homes (especially outside Bethany), with:
  • Small multifamily properties (duplexes/small apartment buildings) primarily in town
  • Manufactured homes present in rural areas and small communities
  • Rural residential lots/acreages with outbuildings and agricultural adjacency Housing unit type distributions are provided in ACS (“Units in Structure”) in the county profile.

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools or amenities)

• In Harrison County, proximity-to-amenity effects are most pronounced in Bethany (access to schools, county services, retail, and healthcare) and in smaller communities tied to district campuses.
• Rural properties tend to trade on acreage, road access, and distance to town services rather than walkability. No single countywide dataset standardizes “neighborhood quality,” but location-based context can be cross-referenced using district campus locations and municipal boundaries.

Property tax overview (average rate and typical homeowner cost)

• Missouri property taxes are assessed locally and vary by overlapping taxing jurisdictions (county, school district, city, special districts).
• The most consistent publicly comparable measure is the ACS estimate of median real estate taxes paid for owner-occupied homes (and distribution brackets) in the housing cost section of data.census.gov.
• Average effective property tax rate is not published as a single official countywide rate because levy and assessed value differ by jurisdiction; the “typical homeowner cost” is best represented by the ACS median taxes paid, with school district levies often constituting a large share of the total bill in rural counties.