Wright County is located in east-central Minnesota, northwest of the Twin Cities metropolitan area, along the Interstate 94 corridor. Established in 1855 and named for territorial governor Henry Hastings Sibley’s successor as a federal official, the county developed early around agriculture, river access, and later rail and highway connections. With a population of roughly 140,000, Wright County is mid-sized by Minnesota standards and has experienced sustained growth tied to suburban expansion from the Minneapolis–Saint Paul region. Land use blends rapidly growing residential communities with extensive rural areas, including row-crop farming, pastureland, and lakes. The county’s landscape is shaped by glacial terrain and major waterways, including the Mississippi River along its eastern edge, contributing to a mix of wetlands, forests, and lake districts. The county seat is Buffalo.

Wright County Local Demographic Profile

Wright County is in east-central Minnesota, northwest of the Twin Cities metro area, and includes fast-growing suburban and exurban communities along the I‑94 corridor. For local government and planning resources, visit the Wright County official website.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts page for Wright County, Minnesota, Wright County had an estimated population (most recent annual estimate shown on QuickFacts) reported by the Census Bureau.

Age & Gender

Age distribution and sex composition for Wright County are reported by the U.S. Census Bureau on the county’s QuickFacts demographic profile, including:

  • Population under 18 years
  • Population 65 years and over
  • Female persons (as a share of total population), which supports calculation of the county’s gender ratio from Census-reported shares

Racial & Ethnic Composition

County-level racial and ethnic composition is reported by the U.S. Census Bureau on the Wright County QuickFacts profile, including (as separate measures) major race categories and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity.

Household and Housing Data

Household and housing indicators for Wright County are provided on the U.S. Census Bureau’s QuickFacts page, including commonly used local-planning measures such as:

  • Number of households and average household size
  • Owner-occupied housing rate
  • Median value of owner-occupied housing units
  • Median selected monthly owner costs (with and without a mortgage) and median gross rent
  • Building permits and other housing stock indicators shown in the QuickFacts housing section

Source note: The linked Census Bureau QuickFacts profile is the primary county-level compilation of these measures and displays the specific values and reference years used by the Census Bureau for Wright County.

Email Usage

Wright County, in the western Twin Cities exurban area, includes both higher-density cities and lower-density townships; this mix typically produces uneven broadband availability and reliance on mobile connectivity in more rural pockets, shaping how residents access email and other online services.

Direct county-level email usage statistics are not routinely published, so broadband subscription and device access are used as proxies for likely email adoption. County digital access indicators are available via the U.S. Census Bureau (American Community Survey), including household broadband subscriptions and computer ownership, which closely track practical email access at home. Age structure also influences email use: higher shares of older adults are generally associated with lower adoption of newer messaging platforms and continued reliance on email for formal communication; Wright County age distributions can be verified through ACS age tables. Gender distribution is typically near parity and is not a primary driver of email access relative to age and connectivity.

Connectivity constraints are most relevant outside municipal centers, where last-mile infrastructure and provider coverage can limit fixed broadband options; regional availability patterns are documented in the FCC National Broadband Map.

Mobile Phone Usage

Wright County is in east‑central Minnesota at the northwestern edge of the Twin Cities metro influence, with a mix of fast‑growing exurban communities (including areas around Monticello, Buffalo, and Delano) and lower‑density rural townships. This settlement pattern—higher density along major highways and population centers and lower density across agricultural and lake areas—creates typical connectivity differences between towns (more sites, shorter tower spacing) and rural zones (greater reliance on macro towers and terrain/vegetation). Countywide mobile experience is shaped primarily by population density, distance to cell sites, and backhaul availability rather than rugged terrain.

Data limits and how to interpret indicators

County-specific “mobile penetration” metrics (such as subscriptions per 100 residents) are generally not published at the county level in the United States. The most consistent county-scale indicators come from (1) household surveys on internet access and (2) modeled coverage and provider-reported availability. These measure different things:

  • Network availability: whether a location is reported as covered by a technology (4G/5G) at a given performance threshold.
  • Household adoption: whether residents actually subscribe to mobile service and use mobile broadband for internet access, including mobile-only households.

Network availability (coverage) in Wright County

Primary source: the Federal Communications Commission’s provider-reported coverage layers.

  • The most direct public reference for local mobile availability is the FCC National Broadband Map, which reports fixed and mobile broadband availability by provider and technology and allows viewing at address level and summarization by geography. See the FCC’s mapping platform at FCC National Broadband Map.
  • FCC mobile availability reporting reflects carrier-submitted propagation models and can overstate real-world performance in fringe areas; it is best interpreted as reported service availability, not guaranteed user experience. Methodology context is summarized by the FCC’s mapping program materials at FCC Broadband Data Collection.

4G LTE

  • Availability pattern: In Wright County, 4G LTE is typically reported as broadly available, with the most consistent signal and capacity near population centers and along major transportation corridors (e.g., U.S. 12, I‑94, MN‑25, MN‑55). Rural township edges commonly show more variability in indoor coverage and throughput due to tower spacing and building penetration limits.
  • What the FCC data represents: LTE presence in FCC reporting indicates a provider claims coverage above a defined reliability/signal threshold, not that all users consistently receive high throughput.

5G (including “low-band” and “mid-band” deployments where present)

  • Availability pattern: 5G availability in counties adjacent to the Twin Cities often appears in FCC reporting with the densest footprint near incorporated cities and higher-traffic corridors. Wright County’s exurban towns are more likely to show 5G presence than sparsely populated rural areas, reflecting deployment economics (site density and backhaul).
  • Interpreting 5G: Reported 5G coverage does not indicate the specific band or expected performance. In many areas, “5G” can reflect low-band deployments with coverage similar to LTE, while mid-band capacity gains tend to appear where site density and backhaul support it.

Household adoption (actual use) and access indicators

County-level adoption indicators are best drawn from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) tables on:

  • Households with a cellular data plan
  • Households with smartphone access
  • Households with broadband internet subscription, including distinctions between mobile and fixed in some tables

These are adoption metrics (what households report having), not coverage.

Primary source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS internet subscription and computing device tables, accessible through data.census.gov (search by “Wright County, Minnesota” and tables related to “Types of Computers and Internet Subscriptions”). Technical background for the survey program is available at the American Community Survey (ACS).

Mobile penetration or access indicators (where available)

  • Cellular data plan / smartphone presence: ACS provides county-estimable measures for households reporting a cellular data plan and those reporting a smartphone, which function as the most direct publicly available “mobile access” indicators at county scale.
  • Mobile-only reliance: In many U.S. counties, a subset of households report using a cellular data plan as their primary or only internet connection. ACS tables can be used to quantify households with cellular data plans and compare to fixed broadband subscription indicators, but interpretation must remain survey-based and subject to margins of error at county level.

Mobile internet usage patterns (adoption vs technology availability)

Adoption-side usage (household-reported)

  • ACS can indicate how many households rely on cellular data plans and whether they also subscribe to fixed broadband (cable/fiber/DSL). This supports a county profile of mobile-only versus multi-connection households, but does not measure 4G vs 5G usage.
  • ACS does not directly report “4G vs 5G usage,” device radio capabilities, or carrier plan quality at the county level.

Network-side usage (4G vs 5G)

  • 4G and 5G availability are best treated as coverage layers rather than usage patterns. For Wright County, the FCC map can be used to identify where 5G is reported and where LTE is the primary reported technology.
  • Actual usage distribution (share of traffic on 5G vs LTE) is typically proprietary carrier telemetry and not published as a county statistic.

Common device types (smartphones vs other devices)

Most reliable county-scale indicator: ACS household device questions.

  • ACS includes indicators for households with a smartphone, desktop/laptop, tablet, and other device categories. This allows a county-level view of smartphone prevalence relative to other computing devices (adoption, not network capability). Access via data.census.gov.
  • Device “type” beyond these categories (e.g., model mix, 5G-capable handset share) is not published in standard county-level public datasets and is typically available only through commercial market research.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity

Settlement pattern and density

  • Wright County’s mix of exurban growth areas and rural townships tends to produce a connectivity gradient: stronger indoor and capacity performance around towns and along highways, and more variable service in lower-density areas where fewer towers serve larger footprints.

Commuter orientation and highway corridors

  • Proximity to the Twin Cities region and commuting corridors generally aligns with higher demand for mobile data and more network investment along high-traffic routes, affecting availability and performance patterns.

Socioeconomic and household structure correlates (adoption-side)

  • ACS-derived adoption measures typically correlate with income, age distribution, and housing type (e.g., multifamily vs single-family; newer subdivisions vs dispersed rural housing). County-level analysis can be anchored in Wright County ACS profiles and compared to Minnesota benchmarks using U.S. Census tables, with attention to margins of error.

State and local broadband context sources (complementary to FCC/ACS)

  • Minnesota broadband planning and adoption context is commonly referenced through the state broadband office and statewide mapping/program documents. See Minnesota DEED Office of Broadband Development for state program context and mapping resources.
  • County planning context and local infrastructure priorities may appear in county publications and planning documents; see Wright County’s official website for county-level plans and references that sometimes intersect with connectivity (land use, right-of-way, public safety communications).

Clear distinction summary: availability vs adoption in Wright County

  • Availability (reported coverage): Best measured through the FCC’s modeled, provider-reported mobile availability layers on the FCC National Broadband Map, which show where LTE/5G are claimed to be available.
  • Adoption (household access and use): Best measured through household survey results in U.S. Census Bureau ACS tables, including smartphone prevalence and cellular data plan subscriptions. These data quantify what households report having, independent of whether strong mobile coverage is available everywhere in the county.

Social Media Trends

Wright County is in east‑central Minnesota on the northwest edge of the Minneapolis–St. Paul metro area, with growth-oriented communities such as Buffalo, Monticello, and Albertville and strong commuter ties to regional job centers. This mix of suburbanizing neighborhoods, exurban development, and small-town hubs tends to align with statewide and national patterns of high smartphone connectivity and frequent use of major social platforms for local news, school/community updates, commerce, and events.

User statistics (penetration and active use)

  • County-level platform penetration is not published in a standardized public dataset; the most defensible estimates rely on national and statewide proxies.
  • Nationally, about 7 in 10 U.S. adults use at least one social media site (72% in Pew’s 2023 measure). Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.
  • Nationally, smartphone ownership is very high (about 9 in 10 U.S. adults; 90% in 2024), supporting routine social app access. Source: Pew Research Center mobile fact sheet.
  • For Wright County, a practical interpretation is high overall social media reach among adults, broadly comparable to national adult usage (roughly ~70%+), with near‑ubiquitous reach among teens and younger adults (see age trends below). This reflects Wright County’s proximity to the Twin Cities labor market and its relatively large share of working‑age households.

Age group trends (who uses social media most)

National age gradients closely predict local usage patterns:

Teen use is near-universal and platform-skewed:

Gender breakdown

Across major platforms, gender skews vary more by platform than by overall “any social media” use. Platform-level gender patterns from large-scale audience measurement are commonly used as proxies for local composition:

  • Facebook: women slightly higher than men globally (roughly low‑to‑mid‑50% women, depending on measurement period).
  • Instagram: women higher than men (often mid‑50% women).
  • Pinterest: strongly female-skewed.
  • Reddit: male-skewed.
    A commonly cited compilation is Datareportal’s Digital 2024: United States, which summarizes ad-audience and survey indicators by platform. Local Wright County gender patterns are typically expected to mirror these platform skews, with overall social media participation relatively balanced by gender but differing in platform choice.

Most-used platforms (share of adults; national benchmarks)

County-specific platform shares are not released publicly; national adult usage provides the most reliable benchmark for Wright County context:

Behavioral trends (engagement and preferences)

  • Video-first consumption dominates: YouTube’s broad penetration among adults and near-universal teen use supports high demand for how‑to, local-event clips, school/community sports highlights, and short entertainment content. Source: Pew social media fact sheet and Pew teen platform use.
  • Age-driven platform segmentation: Older adults over-index on Facebook for community information and groups; younger residents skew toward Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok for messaging, creators, and short-form video. Source: Pew platform-by-age data.
  • Local information flows through groups and shares: Suburban/exurban counties commonly rely on Facebook Groups and local pages for school updates, city announcements, weather impacts, and community events, reflecting Facebook’s still-high adult reach (68%). Source: Pew platform usage.
  • Messaging and social video shape daily frequency: National patterns show higher daily use for platforms oriented around feeds and short video (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, TikTok), while LinkedIn tends to be more episodic and job-change driven. Source: Pew social media fact sheet.
  • Commerce and local services discovery: Instagram and Facebook usage supports discovery of local services, restaurants, and events, while YouTube is frequently used for product research and tutorials; this tracks with high smartphone access nationally. Source: Pew mobile fact sheet and Pew social media fact sheet.

Family & Associates Records

Wright County, Minnesota maintains family and associate-related public records through the county recorder, court administration, and the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). Birth and death records are vital records created by MDH; certified copies are generally obtainable through county offices or MDH, with statutory access restrictions. Marriage records are recorded by the county and are typically searchable as public records. Divorce, paternity, guardianship, adoption, and other family-case filings are maintained as court records; adoption records are largely confidential, and many family-court records may be restricted or partially redacted under Minnesota court rules.

Public databases include recorded-property and some vital/marriage indexes via the Wright County Recorder and county-supported online services. Court records and registers of actions are available through Minnesota Judicial Branch Access Case Records, including statewide public access for many case types.

Residents access records online through the recorder’s search tools and the state court access portal, or in person at the Recorder’s Office and Wright County Court Administration. Vital records access and eligibility requirements are governed by MDH: Minnesota Vital Records. Privacy limits commonly apply to birth records for a set period, adoption files, and certain family-court documents, with identity verification required for restricted copies.

Marriage & Divorce Records

Types of records available

  • Marriage records
    • Marriage license application and license (issued by the county).
    • Marriage certificate / marriage record (the completed return after the ceremony is registered; commonly requested as a “certified marriage certificate”).
  • Divorce records
    • Divorce case records (court documents such as findings, conclusions, judgment and decree).
    • Divorce decree (the final court order dissolving the marriage; typically part of the court file).
    • Divorce certificate / divorce record (a state vital record summary derived from the court action; not the full decree).
  • Annulment records
    • Annulment case records (court files) and the final court order/judgment granting an annulment when applicable.
    • Some annulments are reflected in state vital records indexing in similar fashion to divorces, but the controlling documents remain the court orders and case file.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

  • Marriage (Wright County)
    • Filed/maintained by: Wright County’s local vital records office (typically the county recorder/vital records function) as the official county record of the marriage.
    • Access methods: Requests for certified copies are handled through the county vital records office; noncertified or informational copies and verification options depend on county and state practice. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) also maintains statewide marriage records and issues certified copies under state rules.
  • Divorce and annulment (Wright County)
    • Filed/maintained by: Wright County District Court (Minnesota Judicial Branch) as part of the civil/family court case file.
    • Access methods:
      • Court records: Accessible through the court administrator’s office for the district court; many case register entries and certain documents may be viewable through the Minnesota Judicial Branch’s public access systems, subject to confidentiality rules and redactions.
      • State vital record summaries: MDH issues certified divorce records/certificates as a vital record product distinct from the full court decree.

Typical information included in these records

  • Marriage license / marriage record
    • Full names of both parties (including prior names where recorded)
    • Dates and places of birth (commonly collected on the application)
    • Current residence information at time of application
    • Date and place of marriage ceremony
    • Officiant name and authority; witnesses (as recorded on the return)
    • License issue date; filing/recording date; county file number or certificate number
  • Divorce decree / divorce case file
    • Names of the parties; case number; venue (county and judicial district)
    • Date the marriage was dissolved; date judgment was entered
    • Provisions on legal custody/parenting time, child support, and spousal maintenance (when applicable)
    • Property division and allocation of debts
    • Any name change provisions ordered by the court
  • Annulment orders / case file
    • Names of the parties; case number; venue
    • Court findings and the legal basis for annulment under Minnesota law
    • Orders addressing children, support, property, and name issues when applicable

Privacy or legal restrictions

  • Marriage records
    • Minnesota treats marriage records as vital records. Access to certified copies is governed by Minnesota vital records statutes and administrative rules. Identification requirements and request eligibility rules apply for certified copies issued by county offices and MDH.
  • Divorce and annulment court records
    • Court case files are generally public in Minnesota, but access is limited for documents or data classified as confidential or nonpublic by statute or court rule.
    • Sealed records, confidential exhibits, protected personal identifiers, and certain family-court-related information may be restricted, redacted, or not available through remote access even when available at the courthouse.
    • The divorce decree is a court document; the divorce certificate/record issued by MDH is a vital record summary and is subject to vital-record access rules.
  • Practical access limitations
    • Remote public access systems may provide docket-level information while restricting document images for certain case types or document categories.
    • Certified copies of vital records are issued only through authorized government custodians (county vital records offices or MDH), and certified court copies are issued by the court administrator.

Education, Employment and Housing

Wright County is in central Minnesota on the northwest edge of the Twin Cities region, with growth-oriented communities such as Buffalo, Monticello, and Albertville and a mix of exurban neighborhoods, small towns, and rural townships. The county has a comparatively high share of family households, substantial commuting ties to the Minneapolis–St. Paul labor market, and continued residential development along major corridors such as I‑94 and MN‑55. Population and many socioeconomic indicators below are reported through the most recent U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) releases for counties.

Education Indicators

Public schools (count and names)

A single countywide list of “public schools located in Wright County” is not typically published as one official roster; public education is delivered through multiple independent school districts that include in‑county and (in some cases) adjacent-area schools. The most reliable “school count + names” source is the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) school directory, filterable by county/school type:

Wright County’s major public districts serving residents include (at minimum) Buffalo-Hanover-Montrose, Delano, Monticello, Howard Lake–Waverly–Winsted, Maple Lake, Annandale, Rockford, St. Michael–Albertville, and others with overlapping boundaries. Because districts cross county lines, “public schools in the county” counts vary by method (school building location vs. district service area). A definitive count and full school-name roster should be taken directly from the MDE directory filters (County = Wright; School Type = Public).

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

  • Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates are reported most consistently at the district and school level (not as a single countywide statistic). MDE publishes district graduation rates and enrollment/staffing metrics through its profiles and accountability reporting.
  • For county-level context, Wright County’s education outcomes generally track the Minneapolis–St. Paul exurban pattern: high graduation rates in many districts and comparatively strong college-going pipeline, with variation by district and student subgroup. The definitive graduation rate figures are available in the MDE district/school profiles noted above.

Adult educational attainment (countywide)

Adult educational attainment is available as a countywide ACS estimate:

Using the most recent ACS county profile measures (typical county reporting includes “high school graduate or higher” and “bachelor’s degree or higher” for adults age 25+), Wright County is generally characterized by:

  • A high share of adults with at least a high school diploma (common for Minnesota counties overall).
  • A substantial share with a bachelor’s degree or higher, typically above many rural Minnesota counties but often below core-metro counties such as Hennepin.

(Exact percentages vary by ACS release year and margin of error; the official values should be pulled from the latest Wright County ACS “Educational Attainment” table on data.census.gov.)

Notable programs (STEM, vocational training, AP)

Program availability is primarily district-driven. Common offerings in Wright County-area districts include:

  • Advanced Placement (AP) coursework at many high schools.
  • Career and Technical Education (CTE) pathways (construction trades, health sciences, manufacturing/engineering tech, business, agriculture), often delivered through district consortia and regional partnerships.
  • STEM programming that ranges from Project Lead The Way-style sequences to engineering, computer science, and robotics activities, depending on district.

The most consistent program documentation is found in each district’s course catalogs and MDE district profiles.

School safety measures and counseling resources

Safety and student support practices are typically governed at the district level and commonly include:

  • Building access controls (secured entry/visitor management), staff training, and coordination with local law enforcement and emergency management.
  • Student support services such as school counselors, social workers, psychologists, and partnerships with county/community mental health providers; availability varies by district size and staffing levels.

District-specific safety plans are not always fully public due to security sensitivities; counseling and mental health staffing/services are usually summarized on district websites and in staffing reports.

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year available)

County unemployment is tracked by Minnesota DEED and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (LAUS series). The most recent annual and monthly rates are available here:

Wright County typically posts unemployment rates that are low relative to national averages, with cyclical increases during recessions and rapid tightening during strong labor markets. The definitive “most recent year” value should be taken from the DEED LAUS annual average for Wright County.

Major industries and employment sectors

Industry composition is best summarized using ACS “Industry” tables and DEED regional labor market profiles:

In Wright County, the largest employment sectors commonly include:

  • Educational services, health care, and social assistance
  • Retail trade
  • Manufacturing (including advanced manufacturing tied to the I‑94 corridor)
  • Construction (reflecting ongoing residential growth)
  • Professional, scientific, management, and administrative services
  • Transportation and warehousing (corridor-driven logistics activity)

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

ACS “Occupation” tables provide the standard breakdown:

  • Management, business, science, and arts
  • Sales and office
  • Service occupations
  • Natural resources, construction, and maintenance
  • Production, transportation, and material moving

Wright County’s exurban profile typically shows a notable share in construction and production/transportation roles alongside a large management/professional segment tied to metro-area employment.

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

Commuting measures are available via ACS “Commuting (Journey to Work)” tables on data.census.gov:

Typical patterns for Wright County include:

  • High rates of driving alone and carpooling relative to core-urban counties, reflecting lower transit availability.
  • Mean commute times that are commonly higher than the Minnesota statewide average due to out‑commuting toward the Twin Cities job centers, especially from communities along I‑94 and MN‑55.

Local employment vs. out-of-county work

ACS “Place of Work” tables quantify the share working within the county versus outside it. Wright County is generally characterized by:

  • A substantial out‑of‑county commuting share, with many residents working in the broader Minneapolis–St. Paul metro (including Hennepin and Ramsey counties) and in adjacent counties along the I‑94 and US‑10 corridors.
  • Local employment nodes in education/health services, retail, manufacturing, and construction, but not enough to fully absorb the resident labor force.

The most recent numeric split should be taken from ACS “Worked in county of residence” vs. “Worked outside county of residence” for Wright County.

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership and rental share

Tenure is reported in ACS housing tables:

Wright County is generally a high-homeownership county compared with the national average, reflecting a large share of single-family housing and exurban development patterns. Rental housing is concentrated in city centers such as Buffalo, Monticello, Albertville, and Delano, with smaller rental inventories in rural townships.

Median property values and recent trends

Home value levels are available from ACS median value of owner-occupied housing units and are complemented by market reports from regional MLS systems:

Recent trend context (proxy where needed):

  • Like much of the Twin Cities exurban ring, Wright County experienced strong price appreciation from 2020–2022, followed by moderation as mortgage rates rose, with values generally remaining above pre‑2020 levels. For precise year-over-year price movement, county-level MLS statistics are used; these are typically published by regional Realtor associations rather than the Census.

Typical rent prices

Rents are reported in ACS (median gross rent):

Wright County rents generally fall below core-metro counties but reflect metro-area demand pressures and limited multifamily supply in some submarkets. The official “median gross rent” value should be taken from the latest ACS estimate.

Housing types (single-family, apartments, rural lots)

ACS “Units in structure” and local land-use patterns indicate:

  • A dominant share of detached single-family homes, including newer subdivisions in and around Albertville, Otsego-area vicinity (adjacent), St. Michael–area vicinity, Monticello, and Buffalo.
  • Multifamily buildings (duplexes and apartments) concentrated in incorporated cities, often near commercial corridors and civic services.
  • Rural residential lots and hobby farms in townships, with larger lot sizes and septic/well infrastructure common outside city service areas.

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools/amenities)

General location patterns in Wright County:

  • City neighborhoods near downtown Buffalo, Monticello, Delano, and Albertville typically provide closer access to schools, parks, libraries, clinics, and retail services.
  • Subdivision growth areas near major highways (I‑94, MN‑55) tend to emphasize commuting access and newer housing stock.
  • Rural areas provide larger parcels and lower housing density but longer drives to schools and services.

Property tax overview (rate and typical cost)

Property taxes in Minnesota vary primarily by market value, classification (homestead vs. non-homestead), and local levies (county, city, school district, special districts). Wright County property tax statements and levy information are managed locally:

Countywide “average property tax rate” is not a single fixed figure because effective tax rates differ by jurisdiction and property value. As a proxy, Minnesota homestead effective tax burdens are often reported as a percentage of estimated market value in Department of Revenue statistical summaries; the most defensible local measure is the median (or average) net property tax on homesteads reported in state/county tax statistics and Wright County levy reports rather than a single nominal “rate.”

Table of Contents

Other Counties in Minnesota