Lincoln County Local Demographic Profile

Key demographics for Lincoln County, Minnesota (latest available U.S. Census Bureau data)

Population

  • 5,640 (2020 Census)
  • 5,546 (2023 Population Estimates Program)

Age

  • Median age: 46.9 years (ACS 2019–2023)
  • Under 18: 20.7%
  • 18 to 64: 57.6%
  • 65 and over: 21.7%

Sex

  • Male: 50.2%
  • Female: 49.8%

Race and ethnicity (ACS 2019–2023)

  • White alone: 94.7%
  • Black or African American alone: 0.5%
  • American Indian and Alaska Native alone: 0.3%
  • Asian alone: 0.5%
  • Two or more races: 3.8%
  • Hispanic or Latino (of any race): 2.7%

Households (ACS 2019–2023)

  • Total households: 2,420
  • Average household size: 2.25
  • Family households: 62% of households; married-couple households: 51%
  • Households with children under 18: 25%
  • Nonfamily households: 38%; living alone: 33% (65+ living alone: 15%)
  • Owner-occupied housing rate: 81%

Insights

  • Small, slowly declining population since 2010.
  • Older age profile relative to the state, with about one in five residents 65+.
  • Predominantly White, with a small but present Hispanic/Latino population.
  • Household structure skews toward married-couple and owner-occupied homes, with smaller household sizes.

Email Usage in Lincoln County

Lincoln County, MN snapshot

  • Population and density: ~5,600 residents; ~10–11 people per square mile.
  • Estimated email users: ~4,000 residents (age 13+). Adults: ~3,700 email users (≈85% of 18+ residents).
  • Age mix of adult email users: 18–34 ≈21%; 35–64 ≈49%; 65+ ≈30% (reflecting the county’s older age profile).
  • Gender split among users: ≈50% female, ≈50% male (email adoption is essentially even by gender).
  • Digital access trends:
    • ~84% of households have a broadband subscription (ACS-style “broadband of any type”).
    • ~10–15% of adults are smartphone‑only internet users.
    • Email is accessed primarily via smartphones and home broadband; older adults increasingly use webmail on tablets.
  • Connectivity and locality:
    • Most fixed broadband (≥100/20 Mbps) is concentrated in and around Tyler, Lake Benton, Hendricks, and Ivanhoe, with patchier options in outlying farm areas where fixed wireless and satellite remain common.
    • Low settlement density raises last‑mile costs, but Minnesota’s ongoing Border‑to‑Border/BEAD‑supported rural fiber buildouts in southwest MN are expanding coverage and improving reliability.

Overall: email usage is near‑universal among connected adults, with the largest user group aged 35–64 and strong parity by gender.

Mobile Phone Usage in Lincoln County

Mobile phone usage in Lincoln County, Minnesota — 2024 snapshot

Headline user estimates

  • Population and base: About 5,700 residents, roughly 4,500 adults (18+).
  • Adult smartphone users: 3,400–3,800 (about 79–86% of adults), below Minnesota’s adult average (≈88–90%).
  • Basic/feature-phone users: 300–500 adults (≈7–11%).
  • Adults without a mobile phone: 300–450 (≈7–10%).
  • Smartphone-only internet households (smartphone but no fixed home broadband): about 18–24% of households, above the statewide share (≈13–16%).

Demographic breakdown and usage patterns

  • Age:
    • 18–34: very high smartphone take-up (≈92–96%), near state levels.
    • 35–64: high adoption (≈86–91%), modestly below state.
    • 65+: markedly lower (≈60–70%), well below the state’s senior adoption, reflecting the county’s older age structure.
  • Income/education:
    • Lower-income and lower-educational-attainment households show a higher reliance on prepaid plans and smartphone-only internet access than the Minnesota average.
  • Geography within the county:
    • Town centers have adoption and app usage closer to state norms; dispersed farmsteads and lake homes show higher use of voice/text, Wi‑Fi calling, and device signal boosters.
  • Multi-line plans and devices:
    • Longer device replacement cycles than state average; Android share higher than in metro Minnesota, driven by price sensitivity and retail availability.

Digital infrastructure and coverage

  • Cellular coverage:
    • 4G LTE: near-universal along primary roads and town centers; indoor coverage is uneven in metal-roofed structures and at the fringes between towns.
    • 5G:
      • Extended-range (low-band) 5G covers much of the county outdoors, but delivers LTE-like speeds in many areas.
      • Mid-band 5G (faster) is concentrated in or near towns; countywide 5G capacity coverage is materially below state averages, particularly compared to the Twin Cities corridor.
  • Performance:
    • Typical cellular download speeds in towns: roughly 40–120 Mbps; in rural stretches: 10–40 Mbps, with occasional dead zones. Median speeds are well below Minnesota’s metro counties.
    • Uplink performance and latency are limiting factors for live video and telehealth in outlying areas.
  • Tower/small-cell footprint:
    • Macro towers spaced for highway and town coverage; very few small cells. Coverage gaps persist in low-lying terrain and around woodlots and hills.
  • Backhaul and reliability:
    • Fiber backhaul reaches town cores and some towers; several rural sites still rely on microwave backhaul, which constrains peak capacity versus state urban norms.
  • Fixed broadband context (drives mobile reliance):
    • A higher share of locations remain below 100/20 Mbps wired service than the Minnesota average, sustaining above-average smartphone-only household internet and Wi‑Fi calling use.

How Lincoln County differs from Minnesota overall

  • Lower overall smartphone adoption, driven primarily by a higher share of seniors and more dispersed housing.
  • Higher smartphone-only household internet reliance, reflecting patchier fixed broadband and cost sensitivity.
  • Slower, less consistent 5G capacity coverage; more dependence on LTE and extended-range 5G than in metro and larger regional centers.
  • Longer device upgrade cycles and higher prepaid participation than the state average.
  • Greater use of signal boosters, Wi‑Fi calling, and offline-first apps to cope with indoor and fringe-area coverage.

Implications and actionable insights

  • Public services and healthcare should keep SMS/voice-first outreach and low-bandwidth telehealth options alongside app-based channels.
  • Retail and banking should maintain SMS authentication and mobile-web experiences optimized for lower bandwidth.
  • Network improvements with the highest impact: mid-band 5G overlays on existing towers, added fiber backhaul to rural sites, and targeted in‑building coverage solutions for clinics, schools, and ag/co‑op facilities.
  • Digital inclusion efforts that pair low-cost home broadband with device and skills support would reduce the county’s smartphone-only dependence and narrow the usage gap with the state.

Sources and methodology

  • Estimates synthesized from recent Census/ACS computer and internet subscription indicators (2019–2023), FCC mobile coverage and broadband availability data, Minnesota statewide adoption benchmarks, and rural usage patterns. Figures are rounded and presented as county-level ranges where exact point estimates are not published.

Social Media Trends in Lincoln County

Below is a concise, county-weighted snapshot of social media use in Lincoln County, Minnesota. Figures are 2025 modeled estimates for residents age 13+ (platform adoption) and 18+ (overall penetration), derived by combining Lincoln County’s age/sex profile (U.S. Census/ACS) with the latest Pew Research Center platform-by-age adoption rates and rural usage patterns.

Overall usage (18+)

  • Social media penetration: 74% of adults
  • Smartphone access among adults: 86%
  • Typical daily use: 1.3–1.8 hours; 60% check multiple times per day; ~20% of users create most local content (Pareto pattern)

Most-used platforms (share of residents, 13+, using each platform at least monthly)

  • YouTube: 76%
  • Facebook: 69%
  • Instagram: 38%
  • Pinterest: 28%
  • TikTok: 25%
  • Snapchat: 20%
  • LinkedIn: 18%
  • X (Twitter): 14%
  • WhatsApp: 12%
  • Reddit: 10%
  • Nextdoor: 8%

Age-group breakdown (share of each age group using any social platform; top platforms in order)

  • Ages 13–17: 93% use social; YouTube, TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram
  • Ages 18–29: 95% use social; YouTube, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook
  • Ages 30–49: 88% use social; YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok
  • Ages 50–64: 73% use social; Facebook, YouTube, Instagram
  • Ages 65+: 58% use social; Facebook, YouTube

Gender breakdown among social media users

  • Overall: 53% female, 47% male
  • Platform skew:
    • More female: Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest
    • More male: YouTube, Reddit, X, LinkedIn

Behavioral trends in Lincoln County

  • Community-first Facebook: High engagement with local schools, churches, volunteer groups, events, and Marketplace; group posts outperform Page posts for reach and comments.
  • Video as default: YouTube dominates how‑to, farm/DIY, hunting/outdoors, local sports highlights; short-form video (Reels/TikTok) is rising among under‑40s.
  • Messaging and ephemerals: Snapchat is the day-to-day messenger for teens/20s; Instagram Stories used more than feed posts for casual updates.
  • Marketplace-minded: Strong buy/sell activity on Facebook; local-service discovery often begins in groups and referrals rather than search.
  • Posting rhythm: Peak engagement evenings (7–9 pm) and weekend mornings; weekday lunch checks are common but lighter on comments.
  • Trust signals: Local faces, recognizable venues, and practical value (deals, school notices, road/weather updates) drive shares; overtly national or polarizing content underperforms.
  • Cross-posting: Small businesses often cross-post Facebook→Instagram; YouTube links circulated in Facebook groups for longer content.

Notes on method and sources

  • County totals are weighted from Lincoln County’s age and sex structure (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2023/2024) applied to Pew Research Center’s 2024 platform adoption by age, with rural adjustments observed in Pew’s urban–suburban–rural splits. Figures represent modeled local estimates rather than a countywide survey.