Redwood County Local Demographic Profile
Redwood County, Minnesota — key demographics
Population size
- 15,425 (2020 Census); 2023 estimate ~15,250 (U.S. Census Bureau)
Age
- Median age: ~43 years
- Under 18: ~24%
- 65 and over: ~21%
- Working-age (18–64): ~55%
Gender
- Female: ~49.5%
- Male: ~50.5%
Racial/ethnic composition
- White, non-Hispanic: ~84%
- Hispanic or Latino (any race): ~6–7%
- American Indian/Alaska Native: ~2–3%
- Black or African American: ~1–2%
- Asian: ~1%
- Two or more races: ~4%
Household data
- Households: ~6,400
- Persons per household: ~2.37
- Family households: ~60% of households; married-couple families ~50%
- Households with children under 18: ~27%
- Owner-occupied housing rate: ~78%
Insights
- Small, rural county with an older-than-average age structure, high owner-occupancy, and predominantly White population with notable Native American and Hispanic communities.
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau (2020 Decennial Census; American Community Survey 2019–2023 5-year; QuickFacts, Redwood County, MN)
Email Usage in Redwood County
Redwood County, MN email landscape (estimates based on 2020 Census/2022 ACS and Pew Research norms):
- Population and density: ~15,400 residents across ~881 sq mi (≈17 per sq mi). About 6,400 households.
- Estimated email users: ~10,300 adults (≈89% of ~11,600 adults).
- Age distribution of email users:
- 18–34: ~27%
- 35–54: ~35%
- 55–64: ~16%
- 65+: ~22%
- Gender split of email users: 50% women (5,150) and 50% men (5,150); usage rates are effectively equal by gender.
- Digital access and devices:
- Home broadband subscription: ~80% of households (≈5,100).
- Computer access: ~92% of households (≈5,900).
- Smartphone-only internet access: ~10% of households (≈640), which can constrain email use for file-heavy tasks.
- Connectivity trends and local context:
- Email adoption is near-universal among working-age adults and growing among seniors as telehealth and government services digitize.
- Fiber/cable are concentrated in towns (e.g., population centers), with fixed wireless commonly serving farms and sparsely populated areas; state broadband grants continue to expand rural coverage.
- Lower density and longer last-mile runs keep rural speeds and reliability more variable than in town centers, shaping when and how residents access email.
Mobile Phone Usage in Redwood County
Redwood County, Minnesota — mobile phone usage summary (focus on how it differs from statewide patterns)
Scope and vintage
- Figures reflect 2020 Census counts, 2018–2022 ACS patterns, Pew Research mobile adoption benchmarks (2022–2024), and FCC/National Broadband Map infrastructure status through 2024. Values are best-available point estimates tailored to Redwood County’s demographics and settlement pattern.
Population baseline
- Population: ~15,300–15,400 residents; ~6,500 households; land area ~880 square miles (very low density versus state average)
Estimated mobile users
- Adult mobile phone users (any mobile): ~11,200 (≈95% of ~11,800 adults)
- Adult smartphone users: ~10,000 (≈85% of adults; below Minnesota’s metro-heavy rate near 90%)
- Teen smartphone users (13–17): ~900
- Total smartphone users (age 13+): ~11,000
- Mobile-only households (use cellular data but no wired home internet): ~900–1,050 households (≈14–16% of households), roughly double the statewide share (≈7–8%)
Demographic breakdown (usage patterns that differ from statewide)
- Age
- 18–34: ~2,650 smartphone users (≈96% adoption; near statewide)
- 35–64: ~5,000 smartphone users (≈88% adoption; slightly below statewide)
- 65+: ~2,350 smartphone users (≈70% adoption; 8–12 points below statewide), leaving a larger senior segment relying on basic phones or shared devices
- Income and access
- Lower median income than Minnesota overall yields higher reliance on mobile-only internet and prepaid plans, and a higher propensity to use Android devices
- Home broadband subscription rate is materially lower than the state (Redwood ≈76–79% vs Minnesota ≈88–90%); the gap is most visible in lower-income and outlying townships
- Race/ethnicity
- County population is predominantly White with notable Native (Lower Sioux) and Hispanic communities; mobile-only internet reliance is above average in these communities due to affordability and housing location relative to wired plant
- Work patterns
- Agriculture, manufacturing, and shift work contribute to heavier reliance on voice, text, push-to-talk, and messaging apps during the day and more intermittent high-bandwidth use, unlike metro areas where continuous streaming is common
Digital infrastructure highlights
- Coverage
- 4G LTE: near-ubiquitous in and between towns and along highways; land-area coverage drops in river valleys and low-density western and southern townships
- 5G: present mainly in and around Redwood Falls and along primary corridors (US‑71, MN‑19/67/68); largely low-band/sub‑6 GHz with modest mid-band footprints; mmWave not deployed
- Carriers
- All three national carriers operate countywide; service quality varies by micro‑geography, with the most consistent performance in population centers and along trunk roads
- Backhaul and last-mile
- Fiber backhaul exists into Redwood Falls and a handful of nearby towns; outside those areas, sites depend more on microwave or longer fiber laterals, constraining 5G bandwidth
- Fixed wireless and satellite (WISPs and Starlink) adoption is higher than the state average, filling gaps where DSL/coax/fiber are limited
- Resilience
- Weather-driven outages and coverage dips occur in the Minnesota River valley and wooded bluffs; residents maintain higher reliance on SMS and voice for emergency communications than in metro Minnesota
Key trends that differ from Minnesota statewide
- Lower overall smartphone penetration (by about 4–6 percentage points), driven by an older age profile and affordability constraints
- Roughly double the share of mobile-only households, reflecting sparser wired infrastructure and price sensitivity
- Higher uptake of fixed wireless and satellite as primary home internet, with mobile service used as a complement or fallback
- Usage skews more toward voice/SMS and task-oriented data than always‑on streaming typical of the Twin Cities and larger regional hubs
- 5G availability is present but primarily low-band; mid-band performance and capacity gains remain localized versus broader, denser statewide rollouts in metros
What this means for planners and providers
- Outreach, telehealth, and public services should assume a meaningful mobile‑only audience, particularly among seniors and lower-income households
- Optimizing for low-bandwidth, mobile-first experiences (as well as SMS fallbacks) will reach more residents than desktop‑centric designs
- Incremental gains will come from targeted mid-band 5G upgrades near town centers, added rural sectors along river valleys, and expanding affordable fixed wireless where fiber build costs are prohibitive
Social Media Trends in Redwood County
Redwood County, MN — social media snapshot (best-available 2024 estimates)
Who’s online
- Population: ~15.3–15.5k; adults (18+): ~11.8–12.1k; households: ~6.4k
- Gender: ~50% female, ~50% male (Census balance typical for the county)
Most-used platforms (share of Redwood County adults, modeled from Pew 2024 rural benchmarks; counts rounded using ~12k adults)
- YouTube: 80% (9.6k adults)
- Facebook: 69% (8.3k)
- Instagram: 40% (4.8k)
- Pinterest: 33% (4.0k)
- TikTok: 30% (3.6k)
- WhatsApp: 25% (3.0k)
- LinkedIn: 25% (3.0k)
- Snapchat: 24% (2.9k)
- X (Twitter): 22% (2.6k)
- Reddit: 20% (2.4k)
- Nextdoor: 10% (1.2k)
Age-group profile (usage patterns; percentages reflect typical rural U.S. adults in 2024 applied locally)
- Teens (13–17): Snapchat 60–70%, YouTube 90%+, TikTok 60–70%, Instagram ~70%; Facebook low. Heavy DM and Stories; school sports/activities drive spikes.
- 18–29: YouTube ~95%, Instagram ~75–80%, Snapchat ~65%, TikTok ~60–65%, Facebook ~60–65%. Short-form video and DMs dominate; local nightlife, fitness, jobs.
- 30–49: YouTube ~90%+, Facebook ~75–80%, Instagram ~50%, TikTok ~35–40%, Snapchat ~30%. Marketplace, parenting/school groups, local services.
- 50–64: Facebook ~70–75%, YouTube ~80–85%, Instagram ~25–30%, TikTok ~15–20%. News, health, DIY/how‑to; lower posting, higher comment/share.
- 65+: Facebook ~50–55%, YouTube ~60–65%, Instagram ~15%, TikTok ~5–10%. Civic info, church/community updates; primarily lurkers.
Gender patterns
- Women: Higher on Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest; strong engagement with Marketplace, local groups, school/health content.
- Men: Higher on YouTube, Reddit, X; follow sports, agriculture/DIY, tech and finance.
- Messaging: Snapchat and Instagram DMs lead for under 35; Facebook Messenger common 30+.
Behavioral trends in Redwood County (rural, small‑town context)
- Facebook is the community backbone: city/county pages, school districts, churches, sports, and Marketplace drive daily use. Group membership and event discovery are key behaviors.
- YouTube is the default “how‑to” and entertainment platform: farming/repair, hunting/fishing, home projects, and long‑form commentary.
- Short‑form video is growing but targeted: TikTok and Reels reach under‑40s; local highlights (sports clips, events, new businesses) outperform generic content.
- Trust skews local: posts from known people, schools, clinics, and businesses beat anonymous pages. Photo/video proof and practical details get higher saves/shares.
- Posting cadence: evenings (7–9 pm) and weekend mornings perform best; school-year calendars and sports seasons create engagement peaks.
- Commerce: Facebook Marketplace is the dominant buy/sell channel; local service discovery often starts in Facebook groups before Google.
- News and alerts: Weather, road closures, school announcements, and public safety updates see fast, broad reach on Facebook; reshared by group admins.
Method note
- County-level platform data aren’t directly published; figures above are modeled from Pew Research Center’s 2024 social media adoption (with rural adjustments) applied to Redwood County’s adult population from recent Census/ACS totals. Percentages represent adoption (uses the platform), not daily use.
Table of Contents
Other Counties in Minnesota
- Aitkin
- Anoka
- Becker
- Beltrami
- Benton
- Big Stone
- Blue Earth
- Brown
- Carlton
- Carver
- Cass
- Chippewa
- Chisago
- Clay
- Clearwater
- Cook
- Cottonwood
- Crow Wing
- Dakota
- Dodge
- Douglas
- Faribault
- Fillmore
- Freeborn
- Goodhue
- Grant
- Hennepin
- Houston
- Hubbard
- Isanti
- Itasca
- Jackson
- Kanabec
- Kandiyohi
- Kittson
- Koochiching
- Lac Qui Parle
- Lake
- Lake Of The Woods
- Le Sueur
- Lincoln
- Lyon
- Mahnomen
- Marshall
- Martin
- Mcleod
- Meeker
- Mille Lacs
- Morrison
- Mower
- Murray
- Nicollet
- Nobles
- Norman
- Olmsted
- Otter Tail
- Pennington
- Pine
- Pipestone
- Polk
- Pope
- Ramsey
- Red Lake
- Renville
- Rice
- Rock
- Roseau
- Saint Louis
- Scott
- Sherburne
- Sibley
- Stearns
- Steele
- Stevens
- Swift
- Todd
- Traverse
- Wabasha
- Wadena
- Waseca
- Washington
- Watonwan
- Wilkin
- Winona
- Wright
- Yellow Medicine