Macoupin County

Macoupin County is located in southwestern Illinois, between the St. Louis metropolitan area to the west and the state capital region around Springfield to the northeast. Established in 1829 and named for Macoupin Creek, the county developed as part of Illinois’s early agricultural settlement zone, with later growth tied to rail connections and resource extraction in portions of the county. It is mid-sized by population for downstate Illinois, with roughly 45,000 residents, and remains predominantly rural in character. Land use is dominated by row-crop agriculture on gently rolling plains, with small towns serving as local commercial and civic centers. The local economy is anchored by farming, manufacturing, and commuting to nearby employment hubs, including the St. Louis area. Cultural and community life reflects a mix of small-town institutions, school districts, and longstanding regional ties to the Mississippi River corridor. The county seat is Carlinville.

Macoupin County is in southwestern Illinois, between the St. Louis metropolitan area and the state capital region around Springfield. The county seat is Carlinville; for local government and planning resources, visit the Macoupin County official website.

Population Size

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Macoupin County, Illinois, the county had:

• Estimated population (2023): 44,657
• Population (2020): 44,921

Age & Gender

According to the U.S. Census Bureau data portal (data.census.gov) (Decennial Census/ACS county profiles), Macoupin County’s age structure and sex composition are published as standard demographic tables for the county. Exact age-group percentages and the male/female split are available in Census county profile tables; a single consolidated age-distribution and gender-ratio figure is not presented in QuickFacts for every county table view.

Racial & Ethnic Composition

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Macoupin County, Illinois (most recent county percentages shown on the QuickFacts page), the county’s racial and ethnic composition is reported across standard Census categories, including:

• White
• Black or African American
• American Indian and Alaska Native
• Asian
• Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
• Two or more races
  QuickFacts also reports Hispanic or Latino (of any race) as a separate ethnicity measure.

Household & Housing Data

According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Macoupin County, Illinois, Macoupin County household and housing indicators are published in the same county table, including:

• Number of households
• Owner-occupied housing rate
• Median value of owner-occupied housing units
• Median gross rent
• Persons per household
• Total housing units and related housing characteristics

For authoritative county-level tables beyond QuickFacts (including detailed age brackets, sex by age, household type, and tenure), the primary source is the U.S. Census Bureau’s data.census.gov using Macoupin County, Illinois geography filters.

Macoupin County is a largely rural county in southwest Illinois, where lower population density and longer last‑mile distances can constrain fixed broadband deployment and make digital communication (including email) more dependent on available home internet and devices.

Direct, county-level email usage statistics are not generally published; email access is commonly inferred from proxy indicators such as broadband subscriptions and household computer availability reported by the U.S. Census Bureau (data.census.gov) (American Community Survey).

Digital access indicators for Macoupin County can be summarized using ACS measures for: households with a broadband internet subscription and households with a computer (desktop/laptop/tablet/smartphone). These indicators track the practical capacity to create accounts, receive messages, and use webmail or client-based email.

Age structure influences email adoption because older age groups tend to have lower rates of home broadband and device use than working-age adults in many U.S. communities; county age distributions from the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts for Macoupin County are commonly used to contextualize likely adoption.

Gender distribution is available via QuickFacts but is not a primary driver of access compared with age and connectivity.

Infrastructure limitations are reflected in fixed broadband availability and competition patterns documented in FCC National Broadband Map data.

Macoupin County is in west-central Illinois, between the St. Louis metro area (to the southwest) and the state capital region (to the northeast). The county includes small cities (e.g., Carlinville, Gillespie) and extensive rural areas with predominantly flat to gently rolling agricultural terrain. Population density is relatively low compared with Illinois’s major metro counties, which affects mobile connectivity through longer tower spacing, more variable indoor coverage, and fewer locations where dense small-cell networks are economically deployed.

County context and baseline indicators relevant to mobile connectivity

• Rural–small city settlement pattern: Macoupin County’s population is distributed across small municipalities and unincorporated areas, a geography that generally supports broad-area coverage but can limit network capacity and indoor signal strength compared with dense urban networks.
• Commuting and regional influence: Proximity to the St. Louis region can increase demand along major corridors, while more remote townships typically depend on macro-cell towers with wider coverage footprints.
• Authoritative demographic and housing context: County population, housing counts, and settlement distribution are documented in U.S. Census products such as data.census.gov and county profiles.

Key definitions: availability vs. adoption

• Network availability (supply-side): Whether a mobile operator reports service coverage (e.g., LTE/4G or 5G) in a given area.
• Household adoption and use (demand-side): Whether residents subscribe to mobile service, rely on mobile data for internet access, and the kinds of devices used (smartphone vs. other).

These measures are not interchangeable. Areas can have reported coverage but lower adoption because of affordability, device constraints, digital literacy, or preference for fixed broadband.

Mobile penetration and access indicators (adoption)

County-specific “mobile penetration” (subscriber rate) is generally not published as a standard statistic at the county level by federal agencies. The most comparable adoption indicators available at fine geographies are Census measures on device/internet subscription and the prevalence of mobile-only access.

• Household internet subscription and device measures (best public source for adoption): The U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) reports:

  • Whether a household has an internet subscription
  • Whether access is via cellular data plan, cable/fiber/DSL, satellite, or other
  • Whether the household has a smartphone, computer, or other devices
    These variables are available for counties through ACS tables (notably “Computer and Internet Use” tables) via data.census.gov.
    Limitation: ACS data reflect household-reported access and subscription type; they do not measure signal quality or differentiate 4G vs. 5G usage.

• Mobile-only reliance: ACS “cellular data plan” subscription can be used to estimate the share of households relying on mobile service for internet access, but interpretation must distinguish between households that use mobile in addition to fixed broadband and those that use mobile as their only subscription type. County-level breakdowns depend on table selection and margin-of-error constraints.

• Program and administrative indicators (not direct penetration rates): Eligibility and participation in broadband affordability programs can correlate with adoption constraints, but program statistics typically do not map cleanly to a county “penetration” metric.

Mobile internet usage patterns and network availability (4G/5G)

Reported 4G LTE and 5G availability (availability, not adoption)

• FCC Broadband Data Collection (BDC) mobile coverage maps: The FCC publishes provider-reported mobile broadband availability (including 4G LTE and 5G) and allows map-based inspection by location. This is the primary national source for reported coverage at granular geography. Use FCC National Broadband Map.
  Interpretation constraints:

  • Coverage is largely based on provider propagation models and reporting; it does not guarantee indoor performance or consistent speeds.
  • The FCC map indicates where service is reported available, not how many residents subscribe or the typical user experience.

• Illinois state broadband mapping and planning context: The state maintains broadband planning resources and may publish coverage and adoption summaries (often focused on fixed broadband, but sometimes including mobile context). See the Illinois Broadband Office.
  Limitation: State materials may not consistently provide county-specific 4G/5G adoption metrics.

Typical rural–small city pattern in counties like Macoupin (use-pattern framing without overstating)

• 4G LTE as the baseline wide-area layer: In rural counties, LTE commonly provides the most consistent wide-area mobile broadband coverage, especially outside municipal cores.
• 5G availability varies by band and location: Where 5G is reported, performance and reach depend on spectrum (low-band vs. mid-band) and tower density. Reported 5G availability in rural areas often reflects broader-coverage 5G layers with performance closer to LTE in some conditions, while higher-capacity 5G typically concentrates nearer population centers and major roads.
  Limitation: Countywide “share of users on 5G” is not typically published by public sources; usage is inferred from device capability and carrier network deployment rather than measured directly at the county level.

Common device types (smartphones vs. other devices)

• Smartphone prevalence (adoption indicator): ACS “Computer and Internet Use” tables provide county-level estimates of households with a smartphone and other device categories. These estimates can be pulled for Macoupin County through data.census.gov.
  Limitation: ACS reports device presence in the household; it does not indicate the number of devices per person, device age, or whether devices support 5G.

• Non-smartphone devices and mobile access: Public county-level statistics on basic/feature phone usage are limited. Household device categories in ACS focus on smartphones and computers/tablets; they do not provide a comprehensive taxonomy of feature phones or IoT devices.

Demographic and geographic factors influencing mobile usage and connectivity

• Population density and tower economics (availability and quality): Lower density increases per-user infrastructure cost, often resulting in:

  • Greater reliance on macro-cell towers
  • More variable in-building signal
  • Fewer dense-capacity upgrades outside towns
    These are structural factors affecting availability and experienced performance rather than direct measures of adoption.

• Income, age, and household composition (adoption): ACS provides county estimates for age distribution, income, poverty, disability status, and household composition via data.census.gov. These characteristics often correlate with:

  • Smartphone ownership and replacement cycles
  • Likelihood of mobile-only internet subscription
  • Affordability constraints affecting plan tiers and data usage
    Limitation: County-level public data typically show correlations through separate tables; they do not directly attribute causality to mobile adoption.

• Housing and terrain (coverage reliability): Agricultural land use and dispersed housing can reduce indoor coverage consistency. Terrain in Macoupin County is not mountainous, so topographic shadowing is generally less extreme than in hillier regions, but building materials and distance to towers still affect indoor signal.

• Transportation corridors and local centers (availability focus): Service quality and upgrade cadence often track demand along highways and within incorporated places. Reported coverage and technology layers can be inspected location-by-location through the FCC National Broadband Map.
  Limitation: Public sources typically do not provide countywide, carrier-by-carrier performance distributions (e.g., median downlink by census tract) for mobile.

Data limitations and how county-level statements can be supported

• What is generally available at county level (public):

  • Household smartphone presence and internet subscription types from the ACS via data.census.gov
  • Provider-reported 4G/5G availability by location via the FCC National Broadband Map
  • State planning context via the Illinois Broadband Office

• What is generally not available at county level (public):

  • A definitive “mobile penetration rate” (subscribers per capita) by county from a standardized public dataset
  • Countywide measured mobile performance distributions (speed/latency) with consistent methodology across carriers
  • Countywide proportions of residents actively using 4G vs. 5G (as opposed to coverage availability)

These limitations mean that a defensible county overview must explicitly separate reported network availability (FCC BDC coverage) from household adoption (ACS subscription/device measures) and avoid equating coverage with usage.

Macoupin County is in west‑central Illinois between the St. Louis metro area and the Springfield region, with population centers including Carlinville (the county seat), Gillespie, Staunton, and Virden. The county’s mix of small towns, rural areas, and commuter ties to nearby metros tends to align social media use with broader Midwestern patterns: high Facebook use for local news and community groups, steady YouTube use across ages, and more age‑segmented use of Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat.

User statistics (penetration / share active on social platforms)

• Overall adult social media use (benchmark): Nationally, about 7 in 10 U.S. adults use at least one social media site, according to the Pew Research Center social media fact sheet. This is the most commonly cited high-quality baseline for counties without robust local surveys.
• Local context affecting penetration: Macoupin County’s usage levels are generally shaped by two measurable factors that vary by place—broadband/smartphone access and age structure—both of which strongly correlate with social media participation in national datasets (Pew and U.S. Census community data are typically used for these relationships).
• Practical interpretation for Macoupin County: County-level “social media penetration” is rarely measured directly by reputable sources; local patterns are usually inferred using national survey relationships (age, education, internet access) applied to county demographics.

Age group trends (which ages use social media most)

Based on the age gradients reported in Pew’s national survey data (Pew Research Center), the typical age ranking that best fits counties with Macoupin’s rural/small‑city profile is:

• Highest usage: Ages 18–29 (highest likelihood of using multiple platforms; highest TikTok/Instagram/Snapchat concentration).
• High usage: Ages 30–49 (heavy Facebook and YouTube; strong Instagram presence; growing TikTok use).
• Moderate usage: Ages 50–64 (Facebook and YouTube dominate; lower adoption of TikTok/Snapchat).
• Lowest usage (but substantial Facebook/YouTube): Ages 65+ (lowest multi-platform use; comparatively concentrated on Facebook and YouTube).

Gender breakdown

• Overall pattern: Pew routinely finds platform-specific gender skews rather than large differences in “any social media” adoption. In practice this means Macoupin County is expected to show near-parity in overall social media use, with clearer gender differences by platform.
• Common platform skews in Pew data:
  • Pinterest tends to skew more female; Reddit tends to skew more male.
  • Facebook and YouTube are typically closer to gender-balanced in adult usage.
    Source: Pew Research Center social media fact sheet.

Most-used platforms (with percentages where possible)

County-specific platform shares are not commonly published by reputable survey organizations, so the most reliable percentages come from national benchmarks that typically mirror rural Midwestern usage patterns:

• YouTube: ~83% of U.S. adults use YouTube. (Broad, cross-age reach; common for entertainment, “how-to,” and local-interest viewing.)
• Facebook: ~68% of U.S. adults use Facebook. (Common for community groups, school/sports updates, local events, buy/sell groups.)
• Instagram: ~47% of U.S. adults use Instagram. (More concentrated under 50.)
• Pinterest: ~35% of U.S. adults use Pinterest.
• TikTok: ~33% of U.S. adults use TikTok. (Strongest under 30; growing among 30–49.)
• LinkedIn: ~30% of U.S. adults use LinkedIn. (More tied to professional/white-collar labor markets.)
• X (Twitter): ~22% of U.S. adults use X.
• Snapchat: ~27% of U.S. adults use Snapchat. (Heavily concentrated among younger adults.)
  Source for platform percentages: Pew Research Center.

Behavioral trends (engagement patterns and platform preferences)

• Community information behavior (Facebook-centric): In rural and small-city counties, Facebook is commonly used for local announcements, community discussion, event coordination, and marketplace activity; engagement is often group-based rather than centered on public creators.
• Video as the cross-demographic format (YouTube dominance): YouTube’s unusually broad reach supports high engagement for instructional content, local sports highlights, home/auto repair, farming/gardening, and regional news clips, aligning with the platform’s national penetration (Pew).
• Age-segmented “short-form” use: TikTok and Snapchat engagement is typically more frequent and session-based among younger adults, while older users tend to engage less often and concentrate on fewer platforms (Pew’s age-by-platform patterns).
• Private and semi-private sharing: Across U.S. users, sharing and discussion often shift toward private messaging and closed groups rather than fully public posting; this pattern is frequently noted in social media research and is consistent with small-community communication norms.
• Local news discovery: Social platforms—especially Facebook and YouTube—commonly function as discovery channels for local news links and commentary; this is a well-documented national behavior that tends to be more pronounced in places where community groups act as information hubs (Pew social media research summaries: Pew Research Center Internet & Technology).

Macoupin County maintains family-related public records primarily through the County Clerk and the Circuit Clerk. Vital records include birth and death certificates, with many marriage and civil union records also filed and indexed by the County Clerk. Adoption and other family-law case files are maintained by the Circuit Clerk as court records rather than vital records.

Public databases are limited. Recorded documents affecting family and associates (such as marriage-related documents that may appear in land or lien filings) can be searched through the Recorder’s online index where available. Court dockets and case information for family-law matters are generally accessed through the Circuit Clerk rather than a comprehensive public online database.

Access is available online and in person depending on record type. County Clerk services and instructions for obtaining certified copies of vital records are provided via the official Macoupin County Clerk page: Macoupin County Clerk. Land and related recorded document search access is typically provided through the Recorder: Macoupin County Recorder. Family-law and adoption-related court files are handled by the Circuit Clerk: Macoupin County Circuit Clerk.

Privacy and access restrictions apply. Illinois birth records are restricted for a statutory period, and certified copies require eligibility. Adoption records are generally confidential and accessible only by authorized parties or court order. Some court records may be partially restricted to protect minors, victims, or sensitive personal information.

Types of records available

• Marriage records (licenses and certificates/returns)
  • Macoupin County maintains records created through the county marriage licensing process, typically including the marriage license application and the marriage certificate/return (the officiant’s completed portion filed after the ceremony).
• Divorce records (dissolution of marriage)
  • Divorce matters are court cases. Records commonly include the judgment for dissolution of marriage (often referred to as a divorce decree) and related filings (petitions, summons, parenting plans, property settlement agreements, support orders, and subsequent modifications).
• Annulment records (declaration of invalidity)
  • Annulments are handled as court proceedings and are generally recorded as a judgment of invalidity of marriage (sometimes described as a decree declaring the marriage invalid), with a case file similar in structure to divorce case files.

Where records are filed and how they can be accessed

• Marriage licenses and certificates
  • Filed/maintained by: Macoupin County Clerk (the county’s vital records custodian for marriages).
  • Access: Certified copies and verifications are typically obtained through the County Clerk’s office via in-person, mail, or other county-provided request methods. Some indexes may exist for internal or public reference depending on office practice and record age. Older marriage records may also be available on microfilm or through historical repositories.
• Divorce and annulment case files
  • Filed/maintained by: Macoupin County Circuit Clerk as part of the official court record for domestic relations cases in the Circuit Court.
  • Access: Many docket entries and case information are accessible through the Circuit Clerk’s public access systems or at the courthouse. Copies of judgments/orders and other filings are typically provided by the Circuit Clerk for a fee. Some documents may be restricted or redacted under Illinois Supreme Court rules and statutes.
• State-level records (context)
  • Illinois maintains statewide vital records administration through the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH), Division of Vital Records, which issues certain verifications and certified copies under state rules. County offices remain the primary custodians for county-filed marriage records, and circuit clerks remain custodians for court case files.
  • Reference: Illinois Department of Public Health – Vital Records

Typical information included in these records

• Marriage license application / license
  • Full names of the parties
  • Dates and places of birth or ages (format varies by period)
  • Current residence addresses and/or county of residence
  • Marital status (e.g., single, divorced, widowed), and sometimes number of prior marriages
  • Parents’ names and birthplaces may appear in some eras/forms
  • Date of application/issuance and license number
  • Clerk’s certification and signatures
• Marriage certificate/return
  • Date and place of marriage (venue/city)
  • Name and title/authority of officiant
  • Signatures of parties, officiant, and sometimes witnesses (varies)
  • Date the officiant returned the completed certificate to the clerk
• Divorce (dissolution) judgments and case files
  • Names of the parties and case number
  • Filing date and judgment date
  • Grounds are generally not detailed in modern no-fault dissolution practice; the judgment focuses on findings and orders
  • Orders on allocation of parental responsibilities, parenting time, child support, maintenance (alimony), division of property and debts, attorney’s fees
  • Subsequent orders modifying custody/parenting time/support, enforcement actions, and notices
• Annulment (invalidity) judgments and case files
  • Names of the parties and case number
  • Findings supporting invalidity under Illinois law and related relief (property, support, parentage-related issues as applicable)
  • Related motions, affidavits, and orders similar to other domestic relations matters

Privacy or legal restrictions

• Marriage records
  • Marriage records are generally treated as vital records. Access to certified copies is governed by Illinois vital records laws and administrative rules, and county clerks commonly require appropriate identification and/or a documented relationship or lawful purpose depending on the type of copy requested and record age.
• Divorce and annulment records
  • Court records are generally public, but specific documents or data fields may be confidential by statute or court rule. Common restrictions include:
    • Sealed cases or sealed filings by court order
    • Confidential information protected from public disclosure (e.g., Social Security numbers, certain financial account numbers, and other personal identifiers) under Illinois Supreme Court rules on privacy and redaction
    • Protected information involving minors, abuse/neglect proceedings, orders of protection, and certain mental health or sensitive evaluations when sealed or otherwise restricted
  • Public access frequently includes the docket and nonsealed orders, while access to restricted filings may be limited to the parties, attorneys of record, or persons authorized by court order.

Macoupin County is in south‑central Illinois between the St. Louis metro area and the state capital region, with a mix of small cities (e.g., Carlinville, Gillespie, Staunton) and extensive rural townships. The county’s population is roughly in the low‑to‑mid 40,000s in recent estimates, with a community context shaped by long‑running public‑sector services (schools, local government), manufacturing and transportation-linked activity along regional highways, and a substantial share of residents commuting to larger job centers outside the county.

Education Indicators

Public school landscape (counts and school names)

Macoupin County K‑12 public education is delivered through multiple districts serving Carlinville, Gillespie, Staunton, Mount Olive, and surrounding rural areas. A countywide “number of public schools” varies by how campuses are counted (elementary/middle/high, attendance centers, and district facilities); for the most consistent and current school‑by‑school listings, the authoritative roster is the Illinois State Board of Education (ISBE) “Illinois Report Card”, which lists each district’s schools and profiles: Illinois Report Card (ISBE).
Proxy note: A single consolidated “county school count” is not published as a standard county indicator in one place; ISBE school rosters by district are the most current source.

Student–teacher ratios and graduation rates

• Student–teacher ratios: Reported at the district/school level on ISBE report cards (typically aligned to staffing and enrollment for the reporting year). Countywide ratios are not published as a standard single figure; district-level values are the best proxy: ISBE district and school profiles.
• Graduation rates: Four‑year high school graduation rates are reported annually for each high school and district through ISBE. A single countywide graduation rate is not the standard reporting unit; high‑school‑level graduation rates across the county are the best available proxy via the same source: ISBE graduation rate reporting.

Adult educational attainment (county level)

The most consistent countywide adult attainment measures come from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS). Macoupin County’s profile typically reflects:

• A large majority of adults with at least a high school diploma
• A smaller share with a bachelor’s degree or higher than Illinois statewide averages
  County tables are available through: U.S. Census Bureau data.census.gov (ACS county educational attainment).
  Proxy note: ACS is the standard source for county-level adult attainment; point estimates vary by 1‑year vs 5‑year ACS releases.

Notable programs (STEM, vocational, AP)

• Career and Technical Education (CTE)/vocational training: Illinois public high schools commonly provide CTE pathways (agriculture, industrial technology, health, business/IT) and dual‑credit opportunities through regional community college partnerships; program availability is best verified by individual high school and district program pages and the ISBE report card indicators for coursework participation. ISBE publishes coursework and “college and career readiness” measures by school: ISBE college/career readiness indicators.
• Advanced Placement (AP) / dual credit: AP participation and performance, along with dual credit metrics where reported, are available through ISBE’s high school reporting.
  Data limitation note: A countywide inventory of specific STEM labs, academies, or named pathways is not maintained as a single county dataset; school-level reporting is the primary source.

School safety measures and counseling resources

Illinois districts generally document safety planning (visitor controls, drills, crisis response protocols) and student support services (counselors, social workers, psychologists) through board policies and school handbooks; staffing categories and student support indicators are also reflected in ISBE staffing and environment metrics. The most standardized cross‑school reference point is ISBE’s staffing and environment indicators at the school level: ISBE staffing and learning environment reporting.
Proxy note: Detailed security measures are typically described in local policy documents rather than in a uniform county dataset.

---

Employment and Economic Conditions

Unemployment rate (most recent year available)

County unemployment rates are published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS). The most recent annual and monthly figures for Macoupin County are available here: BLS LAUS (county unemployment).
Data note: The “most recent year” depends on the latest BLS annual average release; monthly updates provide the most current readings.

Major industries and employment sectors

Macoupin County’s employment base is typically concentrated in:

• Manufacturing
• Health care and social assistance
• Retail trade
• Educational services/public administration
• Transportation and warehousing (regional access to interstates and St. Louis-area logistics corridors)
  The most comparable county sector breakdown is available via ACS “industry by occupation/industry by employment” tables: ACS county industry tables (data.census.gov).

Common occupations and workforce breakdown

Common occupational groups in county-level ACS profiles generally include:

• Production and transportation/material moving
• Office/administrative support
• Sales
• Management and business
• Healthcare support and practitioners
• Construction and maintenance
  County occupation tables are available via: ACS county occupation tables (data.census.gov).

Commuting patterns and mean commute time

• Mean commute time: Reported by the ACS for workers age 16+; Macoupin County is typically characterized by a moderate-to-long average commute consistent with commuting to Madison County, St. Louis-area job centers, and the Springfield region. The official mean travel time to work is available in ACS commuting tables: ACS commuting (travel time to work) tables.
• Commuting mode: The county is predominantly drive-alone commuting, with smaller shares carpooling and limited public transit use (typical for rural/small-city counties). Mode shares are also reported in the same ACS commuting tables.

Local employment vs out-of-county work

A substantial share of residents work outside Macoupin County due to proximity to larger employment centers. The most direct measures come from:

• ACS “place of work”/commuting characteristics (county-of-residence perspective): ACS place-of-work/commuting tables
• LEHD/OnTheMap inflow-outflow (county-of-workplace vs county-of-residence flows): U.S. Census OnTheMap (commuting flows)
  Proxy note: OnTheMap provides the clearest split between jobs located in the county and employed residents commuting out.

---

Housing and Real Estate

Homeownership and renting

Macoupin County is generally majority owner‑occupied, reflecting its small-city and rural housing stock. The official owner/renter shares are available in ACS housing tenure tables: ACS housing tenure (owner vs renter) tables.

Median property values and recent trends

• Median home value (owner‑occupied): Available from ACS “Value” tables on data.census.gov: ACS median home value (county).
• Trend proxy: County-level home values in downstate Illinois have generally risen since the late 2010s, with slower appreciation than many major metros; year‑over‑year comparisons can be made using successive ACS 5‑year releases (more stable for small counties).
  Data limitation note: A single “recent trend” statistic is not published as a standard county series outside ACS or proprietary real estate datasets; ACS provides the consistent public benchmark.

Typical rent prices

• Median gross rent: Reported in ACS rent tables: ACS median gross rent (county).
  Proxy note: Asking rents can diverge from ACS gross rent; ACS remains the standard countywide measure.

Housing types

The county’s housing stock is predominantly:

• Single‑family detached homes in city neighborhoods and rural parcels
• Manufactured housing in some rural and small-town areas
• Small multifamily properties and apartments concentrated in the larger municipalities
  ACS “Units in Structure” tables provide the countywide distribution: ACS units-in-structure (housing type) tables.

Neighborhood characteristics (proximity to schools/amenities)

• Small-city neighborhoods (Carlinville, Gillespie, Staunton, Mount Olive) tend to have closer proximity to schools, parks, and municipal services, with older housing stock and gridded street patterns.
• Rural areas feature larger lots, farm-adjacent residences, and longer drives to schools, healthcare, and retail hubs.
  Proxy note: Countywide datasets do not publish a standardized “proximity to schools/amenities” index; municipal land use patterns and school attendance boundaries drive practical access.

Property tax overview (rate and typical cost)

Illinois property taxes are administered locally and vary by taxing district; countywide summaries are available through:

• Illinois Department of Revenue property tax statistics: Illinois Department of Revenue (property tax data)
• Macoupin County assessment/treasurer resources (billing, equalization, exemptions) via county offices: Macoupin County government
  In downstate Illinois counties, effective property tax rates are often relatively high compared with national averages, with typical homeowner tax bills driven by assessed value, local school levies, and municipal services.
  Data limitation note: A single “average effective tax rate and typical homeowner cost” requires either a specific assessment-year county abstract or a standardized dataset (e.g., IDoR tables); those figures vary materially by township, municipality, and school district boundaries within the county.